The Comprehensive Comparison of Bacterial Artificial Chromosomes (BACs)-on-Beads Assay and Copy Number Variation Sequencing in Prenatal Diagnosis of Southern Chinese Women

Prenatal diagnosis of developmental and epileptic encephalopathy 9 with a 10.05-Mb microdeletion at Xq21.31q22.1 inherited from mother: A case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy 9 (DEE9) is characterized by early infantile seizures and mild-to-severe neuropsychiatric symptoms. Despite being an X-linked dominant disorder, DEE9 mainly affects heterozygous females or mosaic males, while hemizygous males are less affected. PCDH19 gene has been documented as the causative gene.

METHODS

Karyotyping analysis and copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) were performed on a pregnant woman with epilepsy, together with her husband, son, and fetus.

RESULTS

A disease-causing microdeletion, seq[GRCh37] del(X)(q21.31q22.1) (90310001-100360000), was identified in the pregnant woman and her female fetus. The microdeletion includes the entire PCDH19 gene and is classified as "pathogenic" according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines.

CONCLUSION

In this case study, we have not only identified the epilepsy type of the woman as DEE9 but have also made an unfavorable prognosis for her fetus. Our findings from this prenatal case provide valuable clinical resources for prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling, while also implying the potential of CNV-seq as a viable method for uncovering PCDH19-related epilepsy.

Comparison of the combined use of CNV-seq and karyotyping or QF-PCR in prenatal diagnosis: a retrospective study

To elevate the accuracy of diagnostic results, CNV-seq is usually performed simultaneously with karyotyping or QF-PCR. Although several studies have investigated the performance of the combined use of CNV-seq with karyotyping or QF-PCR, there have been no reports focusing on the comparison of these 2 diagnostic strategies. In our study, 2507 pregnant women were included to investigate these 2 strategies. The detection rates of foetal genetic abnormalities and turnaround time were compared between these 2 groups. Moreover, the detection rates of foetal genetic abnormalities in different indications were analyzed. Our results unveiled that the detection rates of numerical chromosomal abnormalities were nearly the same in these 2 groups. In addition to numerical chromosomal abnormalities, 39 balanced karyotypic changes and chromosome polymorphisms were detected via the combined use of karyotyping and CNV-seq. Further investigation revealed that the vast majority of these karyotypic changes were inherited from parents. Compared with the karyotyping group, the combination of QF-PCR and CNV-seq reduced the reporting time from 31.593 ± 4.944 days to 11.460 ± 4.894 days. Meanwhile, NIPT, maternal serum screening and ultrasound scan significantly improved the detection of foetal genetic abnormalities. In conclusion, our results revealed that parental karyotyping is a useful supplementary method for CNV-seq and systematic prenatal examinations improved the detection of foetal genetic defects.

Clinical Utility of the Prenatal BACs-on-Beads™ Assay in Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis

Background: The prenatal BACs-on-Beads™ (PNBoBs™) assay has been applied worldwide for prenatal diagnosis. However, there are neither guidelines nor consensus on choosing patients, sample types, or clinical pathways for using this technique. Moreover, different perspectives have emerged regarding its clinical value. This study aimed to evaluate its clinical utility in the context of clinical practice located in a prenatal diagnostic center in Xiamen, a city in southeast China. Methods: We tested 2,368 prenatal samples with multiple referral indications using both conventional karyotyping and PNBoBs™. Positive results from PNBoBs™ were verified using current gold-standard approaches. Results: The overall rates for the detection of pathogenic copy number variation (pCNV) by karyotyping and PNBoBs™ were 1.9% (46/2,368) and 2.0% (48/2,368), respectively. The overall detection rate of karyotyping combined with PNBoBs™ for pCNV was 2.3% (54/2,368). A total of 13 cases of copy number variation (CNV)with a normal karyotype were detected by PNBoBs™. Another case with a normal karyotype that was detected as a CNV of sex chromosomes by PNBoBs™ was validated to be maternal cell contamination by short tandem repeat analysis. Conclusion: Karyotyping combined with PNBoBs™ can improve both the yield and efficiency of prenatal diagnosis and is appropriate in the second trimester in all patients without fetal ultrasound anomalies who undergo invasive prenatal diagnosis.

BACs-on-Beads Assay for the Prenatal Diagnosis of Microdeletion and Microduplication Syndromes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical value of BACs-on-Beads (BoBs) assay in detection of microdeletion and microduplication syndromes.

METHODS

A total of 6,814 cases of amniotic fluid cells collected from January 2015 to July 2020 in our hospital were analyzed by chromosomal karyotyping and BoBs assay. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) provided further validation for the cases of microdeletion and microduplication.

RESULTS

Thirty microdeletion and microduplication syndromes were identified by BoBs with an incidence of ~1/227, including 22q11.2 microduplication (0.044%, 3/6814), DiGeorge I syndrome (0.044%, 3/6814), 17p11.2 microduplication (0.015%, 1/6814), Smith-Magenis syndrome (0.015%, 1/6814), 17p11.2p11.3 microduplication (0.015%, 1/6814), Williams-Beuren syndrome (0.088%, 6/6814), 7q11.2 microduplication (0.029%, 2/6814), DiGeorge II syndrome (0.015%, 1/6814), 18p11.32p11.21 microduplication (0.015%, 1/6814), Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (0.029%, 2/6814), 4p16.3 microduplication (0.015%, 1/6814), Langer-Giedion syndrome (0.015%, 1/6814), Miller-Dieker syndrome (0.015%, 1/6814), Cri du Chat syndrome (0.015%, 1/6814), Xp22.31 microdeletion (0.059%, 4/6814), Prader-Willi syndrome (0.015%, 1/6814). High concordance was obtained between BoBs and FISH or CMA. However, only four cases were detected by chromosomal karyotyping.

CONCLUSION

BoBs assay can rapidly detect microdeletion and microduplication syndromes, which compensates the shortcomings of conventional chromosomal karyotyping and greatly improves the efficiency and accuracy of prenatal diagnosis.