Recommendations for Cell-Free DNA Assay Validations: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology and College of American Pathologists

Evaluation of silica spin‑column and magnetic bead formats for rapid DNA methylation analysis in clinical and point‑of‑care settings

Late-stage cancers lack effective treatment, underscoring the need for early diagnosis to improve prognosis and decrease mortality rates. Molecular markers, such as DNA methylation, offer promise in early cancer detection. The present study compared commercial kits for analyzing DNA from cervical liquid cytology samples in cancer screening. Rapid bisulfite conversion kits using silica spin-columns and magnetic beads were assessed against standard DNA extraction and bisulfite conversion methods for profiling DNA methylation using quantitative methylation-specific PCR. β-actin amplification indicated the suitability of small sample volumes for methylation studies using either the pellet or supernatant (cell-free DNA) parts. Comparison of Bisulfite Conversion Kit-Whole Cell (Abcam), Methylamp Bisulfite Modification (Epigentek), EpiTect Fast LyseAll Bisulfite Kit (Qiagen GmbH) and EZ DNA Methylation-Direct Kit (Zymo Research Corp.) showed no significant differences in β-actin cycle threshold values. EZ-96 DNA Methylation-Lightning MagPrep (Zymo Research Corp.), a hybrid kit in a 96-well plate format, exhibited swift turnaround time and similar amplification efficiency. Automation with magnetic bead kits increased throughput without compromising amplification efficiency in open PCR systems. Cost analysis favored direct kits over the gold standard manual protocol. This comparison aids in selecting cost-effective DNA methylation diagnostic tests. The present study confirmed comparable kit performance in methylation-based analysis, highlighting the adequacy of cytology samples and the potential of bodily fluids as alternatives for liquid biopsy.

Liquid biopsy for the management of NSCLC patients under osimertinib treatment

Therapeutic management of NSCLC patients is quite challenging as they are mainly diagnosed at a late stage of disease, and they present a high heterogeneous molecular profile. Osimertinib changed the paradigm shift in treatment of EGFR mutant NSCLC patients achieving significantly better clinical outcomes. To date, osimertinib is successfully administered not only as first- or second-line treatment, but also as adjuvant treatment while its efficacy is currently investigated during neoadjuvant treatment or in stage III, unresectable EGFR mutant NSCLC patients. However, resistance to osimertinib may occur due to clonal evolution, under the pressure of the targeted therapy. The utilization of liquid biopsy as a minimally invasive tool provides insight into molecular heterogeneity of tumor clonal evolution and potent resistance mechanisms which may help to develop more suitable therapeutic approaches. Longitudinal monitoring of NSCLC patients through ctDNA or CTC analysis could reveal valuable information about clinical outcomes during osimertinib treatment. Therefore, several guidelines suggest that liquid biopsy in addition to tissue biopsy should be considered as a standard of care in the advanced NSCLC setting. This practice could significantly increase the number of NSCLC patients that will eventually benefit from targeted therapies, such as EGFR TKIs.

Clinical applications of next-generation sequencing-based ctDNA analyses in breast cancer: defining treatment targets and dynamic changes during disease progression

The advancements in the detection and characterization of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) have revolutionized precision medicine and are likely to transform standard clinical practice. The non-invasive nature of this approach allows for molecular profiling of the entire tumor entity, while also enabling real-time monitoring of the effectiveness of cancer therapies as well as the identification of resistance mechanisms to guide targeted therapy. Although the field of ctDNA studies offers a wide range of applications, including in early disease, in this review we mainly focus on the role of ctDNA in the dynamic molecular characterization of unresectable locally advanced and metastatic BC (mBC). Here, we provide clinical practice guidance for the rapidly evolving field of molecular profiling of mBC, outlining the current landscape of liquid biopsy applications and how to choose the right ctDNA assay. Additionally, we underline the importance of exploring the clinical relevance of novel molecular alterations that potentially represent therapeutic targets in mBC, along with mutations where targeted therapy is already approved. Finally, we present a potential roadmap for integrating ctDNA analysis into clinical practice.

Current Challenges of Methylation-Based Liquid Biopsies in Cancer Diagnostics

In current clinical practice, effective cancer testing and screening paradigms are limited to specific types of cancer, exhibiting varying efficiency, acceptance, and adherence. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation profiling holds promise in providing information about the presence of malignity regardless of its type and location while leveraging blood-based liquid biopsies as a method to obtain analytical samples. However, technical difficulties, costs and challenges resulting from biological variations, tumor heterogeneity, and exogenous factors persist. This method exploits the mechanisms behind cfDNA release but faces issues like fragmentation, low concentrations, and high background noise. This review explores cfDNA methylation's origins, means of detection, and profiling for cancer diagnostics. The critical evaluation of currently available multi-cancer early detection methods (MCEDs) as well as tests targeting single genes, emphasizing their potential and limits to refine strategies for early cancer detection, are explained. The current methodology limitations, workflows, comparisons of clinically approved liquid biopsy-based methylation tests for cancer, their utilization in companion diagnostics as well as the biological limitations of the epigenetics approach are discussed, aiming to help healthcare providers as well as researchers to orient themselves in this increasingly complex and evolving field of diagnostics.

Analytical validation of a novel comprehensive genomic profiling informed circulating tumor DNA monitoring assay for solid tumors

Emerging technologies focused on the detection and quantification of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in blood show extensive potential for managing patient treatment decisions, informing risk of recurrence, and predicting response to therapy. Currently available tissue-informed approaches are often limited by the need for additional sequencing of normal tissue or peripheral mononuclear cells to identify non-tumor-derived alterations while tissue-naïve approaches are often limited in sensitivity. Here we present the analytical validation for a novel ctDNA monitoring assay, FoundationOne®Tracker. The assay utilizes somatic alterations from comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of tumor tissue. A novel algorithm identifies monitorable alterations with a high probability of being somatic and computationally filters non-tumor-derived alterations such as germline or clonal hematopoiesis variants without the need for sequencing of additional samples. Monitorable alterations identified from tissue CGP are then quantified in blood using a multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay based on the validated SignateraTM assay. The analytical specificity of the plasma workflow is shown to be 99.6% at the sample level. Analytical sensitivity is shown to be >97.3% at ≥5 mean tumor molecules per mL of plasma (MTM/mL) when tested with the most conservative configuration using only two monitorable alterations. The assay also demonstrates high analytical accuracy when compared to liquid biopsy-based CGP as well as high qualitative (measured 100% PPA) and quantitative precision (<11.2% coefficient of variation).

Cell-free DNA methylation in the clinical management of lung cancer

The clinical use of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation in managing lung cancer depends on its ability to differentiate between malignant and healthy cells, assign methylation changes to specific tissue sources, and elucidate opportunities for targeted therapy. From a technical standpoint, cfDNA methylation analysis is primed as a potential clinical tool for lung cancer screening, early diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment, pending the outcome of elaborate validation studies. Here, we discuss the current state of the art in cfDNA methylation analysis, examine the unique features and limitations of these new methods in a clinical context, propose two models for applying cfDNA methylation data for lung cancer screening, and discuss future research directions.

Technical Advances in Circulating Cell-Free DNA Detection and Analysis for Personalized Medicine in Patients' Care

Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) refers to small fragments of DNA molecules released after programmed cell death and necrosis in several body fluids such as blood, saliva, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid. The discovery of cfDNA has revolutionized the field of non-invasive diagnostics in the oncologic field, in prenatal testing, and in organ transplantation. Despite the potential of cfDNA and the solid results published in the recent literature, several challenges remain, represented by a low abundance, a need for highly sensitive assays, and analytical issues. In this review, the main technical advances in cfDNA analysis are presented and discussed, with a comprehensive examination of the current available methodologies applied in each field. Considering the potential advantages of cfDNA, this biomarker is increasing its consensus among clinicians, as it allows us to monitor patients' conditions in an easy and non-invasive way, offering a more personalized care. Nevertheless, cfDNA analysis is still considered a diagnostic marker to be further validated, and very few centers are implementing its analysis in routine diagnostics. As technical improvements are enhancing the performances of cfDNA analysis, its application will transversally improve patients' quality of life.

Leveraging archival cerebrospinal fluid samples for genetic insights from cell-free DNA

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples are often a rich source of tumor‐derived cell‐free DNA (cfDNA), a high degree of success in detecting tumor mutations can even be achieved with archival CSF samples.

Extraction of Cell-Free DNA: Evaluation of Efficiency, Quantity, and Quality

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) serves as a valuable biomarker for early disease detection and monitoring. However, the use of cfDNA for analysis faces challenges owing to general low but variable abundance and fragmentation. Preanalytical factors, including cfDNA extraction, impact cfDNA quality and quantity. Efficient and robust cfDNA extraction is essential for reliable results in downstream applications, and various commercial extraction methods exist, each with trade-offs. To aid researchers and clinicians in choosing the proper cfDNA extraction method, manual, semiautomated, and automated methods were evaluated, including the QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit (manual and QIAcube), QIAamp MinElute ccfDNA Kit (QIAcube), and QIAsymphony DSP Circulating DNA Kit (QIAsymphony). For each extraction method, cfDNA was extracted on two separate days, using samples obtained from 18 healthy donors. This study assessed extraction efficiency, quantity, and quality using droplet digital PCR and TapeStation. The QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit, both manual and semiautomated, outperformed the QIAamp MinElute ccfDNA Kit (QIAcube) and QIAsymphony DSP Circulating DNA Kit (QIAsymphony), showing higher recovery rates and cfDNA quantity. All methods were reproducible, with no day-to-day variability and no contamination by high-molecular-weight DNA. The QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit offers high yield without compromising quality. Implementation of the method should consider specific study and clinical needs, taking into account each method's advantages and limitations for optimal outcomes.

Toward Informed Selection and Interpretation of Clinical Genomic Tests in Prostate Cancer

Clinical genomic testing of patient germline, tumor tissue, or plasma cell-free DNA can enable a personalized approach to cancer management and treatment. In prostate cancer (PCa), broad genotyping tests are now widely used to identify germline and/or somatic alterations in BRCA2 and other DNA damage repair genes. Alterations in these genes can confer cancer sensitivity to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, are linked with poor prognosis, and can have potential hereditary cancer implications for family members. However, there is huge variability in genomic tests and reporting standards, meaning that for successful implementation of testing in clinical practice, end users must carefully select the most appropriate test for a given patient and critically interpret the results. In this white paper, we outline key pre- and post-test considerations for choosing a genomic test and evaluating reported variants, specifically for patients with advanced PCa. Test choice must be based on clinical context and disease state, availability and suitability of tumor tissue, and the genes and regions that are covered by the test. We describe strategies to recognize false positives or negatives in test results, including frameworks to assess low tumor fraction, subclonal alterations, clonal hematopoiesis, and pathogenic versus nonpathogenic variants. We assume that improved understanding among health care professionals and researchers of the nuances associated with genomic testing will ultimately lead to optimal patient care and clinical decision making.

PIK3CA testing in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: real-world data from Italian molecular pathology laboratories

Introduction: PIK3CA gene mutations occur in approximately 40% of hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancers (MBCs), electing them to targeted therapy. Testing PIK3CA status is complex due to selection of biological specimen and testing method. Materials & methods: This work investigates real-life experience on PIK3CA testing in HR+/HER2- MBC. Clinical, technical and molecular data on PIK3CA testing were collected from two referral laboratories. Additionally, the results of a nationwide PIK3CA survey involving 116 institutions were assessed. Results: Overall, n = 35 MBCs were PIK3CA-mutated, with mutations mostly occurring in exons 9 (n = 19; 51.4%) and 20 (n = 15; 40.5%). The nationwide survey revealed significant variability across laboratories in terms of sampling methodology, technical assessment and clinical report signing healthcare figures for PIK3CA molecular testing in diagnostic routine practice. Conclusion: This study provides insights into the real-world routine of PIK3CA testing in HR+/HER2- MBC and highlights the need for standardization and networking in predictive pathology.