1
|
Cooper K, Alexander L, Brandie D, Brown VT, Greig L, Harrison I, MacLean C, Mitchell L, Morrissey D, Moss RA, Parkinson E, Pavlova AV, Shim J, Swinton PA. Exercise therapy for tendinopathy: a mixed-methods evidence synthesis exploring feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness. Health Technol Assess 2023; 27:1-389. [PMID: 37929629 PMCID: PMC10641714 DOI: 10.3310/tfws2748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Tendinopathy is a common, painful and functionally limiting condition, primarily managed conservatively using exercise therapy. Review questions (i) What exercise interventions have been reported in the literature for which tendinopathies? (ii) What outcomes have been reported in studies investigating exercise interventions for tendinopathy? (iii) Which exercise interventions are most effective across all tendinopathies? (iv) Does type/location of tendinopathy or other specific covariates affect which are the most effective exercise therapies? (v) How feasible and acceptable are exercise interventions for tendinopathies? Methods A scoping review mapped exercise interventions for tendinopathies and outcomes reported to date (questions i and ii). Thereafter, two contingent systematic review workstreams were conducted. The first investigated a large number of studies and was split into three efficacy reviews that quantified and compared efficacy across different interventions (question iii), and investigated the influence of a range of potential moderators (question iv). The second was a convergent segregated mixed-method review (question v). Searches for studies published from 1998 were conducted in library databases (n = 9), trial registries (n = 6), grey literature databases (n = 5) and Google Scholar. Scoping review searches were completed on 28 April 2020 with efficacy and mixed-method search updates conducted on 19 January 2021 and 29 March 2021. Results Scoping review - 555 included studies identified a range of exercise interventions and outcomes across a range of tendinopathies, most commonly Achilles, patellar, lateral elbow and rotator cuff-related shoulder pain. Strengthening exercise was most common, with flexibility exercise used primarily in the upper limb. Disability was the most common outcome measured in Achilles, patellar and rotator cuff-related shoulder pain; physical function capacity was most common in lateral elbow tendinopathy. Efficacy reviews - 204 studies provided evidence that exercise therapy is safe and beneficial, and that patients are generally satisfied with treatment outcome and perceive the improvement to be substantial. In the context of generally low and very low-quality evidence, results identified that: (1) the shoulder may benefit more from flexibility (effect sizeResistance:Flexibility = 0.18 [95% CrI 0.07 to 0.29]) and proprioception (effect sizeResistance:Proprioception = 0.16 [95% CrI -1.8 to 0.32]); (2) when performing strengthening exercise it may be most beneficial to combine concentric and eccentric modes (effect sizeEccentricOnly:Concentric+Eccentric = 0.48 [95% CrI -0.13 to 1.1]; and (3) exercise may be most beneficial when combined with another conservative modality (e.g. injection or electro-therapy increasing effect size by ≈0.1 to 0.3). Mixed-method review - 94 studies (11 qualitative) provided evidence that exercise interventions for tendinopathy can largely be considered feasible and acceptable, and that several important factors should be considered when prescribing exercise for tendinopathy, including an awareness of potential barriers to and facilitators of engaging with exercise, patients' and providers' prior experience and beliefs, and the importance of patient education, self-management and the patient-healthcare professional relationship. Limitations Despite a large body of literature on exercise for tendinopathy, there are methodological and reporting limitations that influenced the recommendations that could be made. Conclusion The findings provide some support for the use of exercise combined with another conservative modality; flexibility and proprioception exercise for the shoulder; and a combination of eccentric and concentric strengthening exercise across tendinopathies. However, the findings must be interpreted within the context of the quality of the available evidence. Future work There is an urgent need for high-quality efficacy, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and qualitative research that is adequately reported, using common terminology, definitions and outcomes. Study registration This project is registered as DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00175 (scoping review); PROSPERO CRD 42020168187 (efficacy reviews); https://osf.io/preprints/sportrxiv/y7sk6/ (efficacy review 1); https://osf.io/preprints/sportrxiv/eyxgk/ (efficacy review 2); https://osf.io/preprints/sportrxiv/mx5pv/ (efficacy review 3); PROSPERO CRD42020164641 (mixed-method review). Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) HTA programme and will be published in full in HTA Journal; Vol. 27, No. 24. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kay Cooper
- School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Lyndsay Alexander
- School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen, UK
| | - David Brandie
- Sportscotland Institute of Sport, Airthrey Road, Stirling, UK
| | | | - Leon Greig
- School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Isabelle Harrison
- School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Colin MacLean
- Library Services, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Laura Mitchell
- NHS Grampian, Physiotherapy Department, Ellon Health Centre, Schoolhill, Ellon, Aberdeenshire, UK
| | - Dylan Morrissey
- William Harvey Research Institute, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Hospital, Bancroft Road, London, UK
| | - Rachel Ann Moss
- School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Eva Parkinson
- School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Joanna Shim
- School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Paul Alan Swinton
- School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Catapano M, Ahmed M, Breslow RG, Borg-Stein J. The aging athlete. PM R 2022; 14:643-651. [PMID: 35441493 DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.12814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Aging athletes, those 60 years and older, are a growing population of mature, active individuals who value sports and exercise participation throughout their lifespan. Although recommendations for younger and masters athletes have been extrapolated to this population, there remains a paucity of specific guidelines, treatment algorithms, and considerations for aging athletes. The benefits of living an active lifestyle must be weighed against the risks for unique cardiovascular, metabolic, and musculoskeletal injuries requiring diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. In this article, we review the unique cardiovascular and muscular physiology of aging athletes and how it influences the risk of specific medical conditions. We also discuss general prevention and treatment strategies. Finally, we identify areas of future research priorities and emerging treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Catapano
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of Sports Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marwa Ahmed
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of Sports Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Joanne Borg-Stein
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of Sports Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Leggit JC, Wu H, Janvrin M, Korona-Bailey J, Koehlmoos TP, Schneider EB. Non-Operative Shoulder Dysfunction in the United States Military. Mil Med 2021; 188:e1003-e1009. [PMID: 34865115 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usab468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Revised: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recent epidemiological evidence shows that shoulder and upper-arm complaints impose a substantial burden on the armed forces of the United States and create significant challenges for all components of the physical fitness domain of total force fitness. Clinicians, epidemiologists, and health-services researchers interested in shoulder and upper-arm injuries and their functional limitations rarely have objective, validated criteria for rigorously evaluating diagnostic practices, prescribed treatments, or the outcomes of alternative approaches. We sought to establish and quantify patient volume, types of care, and costs within the Military Health System (MHS) in assessing and managing active duty members with nonoperative shoulder and upper-arm dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the MHS Data Repository and MHS MART (M2) from fiscal year 2014 to identify active duty individuals with a diagnosis of shoulder and upper-arm injury or impairment defined by one of the International Classification of Disease Ninth Edition diagnosis codes that were selected to reflect nonoperative conditions such as fractures or infections. Statistical analyses include descriptive statistics on patient demographics and clinical visits, such as the range and frequency of diagnoses, number and types of appointments, and clinical procedure information following the diagnosis. We also examined treatment costs related to shoulder dysfunction and calculated the total cost to include medications, radiological, procedural, and laboratory test costs for all shoulder dysfunction visits in 2014 and the average cost for each visit. We further examined the category of each medication prescribed. RESULTS A total of 55,643 individuals met study criteria and accrued 193,455 shoulder-dysfunction-related clinical visits in fiscal year 2014. This cohort represents approximately 4.8% of the 1,155,183 active duty service members assigned to the United States and its territories during FY 2014. Most patients were male (85.32%), younger (85.25% were under 40 years old), and Caucasian/White (71.12%). The most common diagnosis code was 719.41 (pain in joint, shoulder region; 42.48%). The majority of the patients 42,750 (76.8%) had four or fewer medical visits during the study period and 12,893 (23.2%) had more than four visits. A total of 4,733 patients (8.5%) underwent arthrocentesis aspiration or injection. The total cost for all visits was $65,066,767.89. The average and median cost for each visit were $336.34 (standard deviation was $1,493.87) and $163.11 (range was from 0 to $84,183.88), respectively. Three out of four patients (75.3%) underwent radiological examinations, and 74.2% of these individuals had more than one radiological examination. Medications were prescribed to 50,610 (91.0%) patients with the three most common being IBUPROFEN (12.21%), NAPROXEN (8.51%), and OXYCODONE-ACETAMINOPHEN (5.04%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Nearly 1 in 20 active duty military service members presented for nonoperative care of shoulder and/or upper-arm dysfunction during FY2014. Further examinations of the etiology and potential impact of shoulder/upper-arm dysfunction on force readiness are clearly warranted, as are additional studies directed at identifying best practices for preventing injury-related dysfunction and determining best practices for the treatment of shoulder dysfunction to optimize service member fitness and force readiness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey C Leggit
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Hongyan Wu
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Miranda Janvrin
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.,Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Jessica Korona-Bailey
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.,Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yu H, Côté P, Wong JJ, Shearer HM, Mior S, Cancelliere C, Randhawa K, Ameis A, Carroll LJ, Nordin M, Varatharajan S, Sutton D, Southerst D, Jacobs C, Stupar M, Taylor-Vaisey A, Gross DP, Brison RJ, Paulden M, Ammendolia C, Cassidy JD, Marshall S, Bohay RN, Stapleton J, Lacerte M. Noninvasive management of soft tissue disorders of the shoulder: A clinical practice guideline from the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) collaboration. Eur J Pain 2021; 25:1644-1667. [PMID: 33942459 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Revised: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Objective of this study is to develop an evidence-based guideline for the noninvasive management of soft tissue disorders of the shoulder (shoulder pain), excluding major pathology. METHODS This guideline is based on high-quality evidence from seven systematic reviews. Multidisciplinary experts considered the evidence of effectiveness, safety, cost-effectiveness, societal and ethical values, and patient experiences when formulating recommendations. Target audience is clinicians; target population is adults with shoulder pain. RESULTS When managing patients with shoulder pain, clinicians should (a) rule out major structural or other pathologies as the cause of shoulder pain and reassure patients about the benign and self-limited nature of most soft tissue shoulder pain; (b) develop a care plan in partnership with the patient; (c) for shoulder pain of any duration, consider low-level laser therapy; multimodal care (heat/cold, joint mobilization, and range of motion exercise); cervicothoracic spine manipulation and mobilization for shoulder pain when associated pain or restricted movement of the cervicothoracic spine; or thoracic spine manipulation; (d) for shoulder pain >3-month duration, consider stretching and/or strengthening exercises; laser acupuncture; or general physician care (information, advice, and pharmacological pain management if necessary); (e) for shoulder pain with calcific tendinitis on imaging, consider shock-wave therapy; (f) for shoulder pain of any duration, do not offer ultrasound; taping; interferential current therapy; diacutaneous fibrolysis; soft tissue massage; or cervicothoracic spine manipulation and mobilization as an adjunct to exercise (i.e., range of motion, strengthening and stretching exercise) for pain between the neck and the elbow at rest or during movement of the arm; (g) for shoulder pain >3-month duration, do not offer shock-wave therapy; and (h) should reassess the patient's status at each visit for worsening of symptoms or new physical, mental, or psychological symptoms, or satisfactory recovery. CONCLUSIONS Our evidence-based guideline provides recommendations for non-invasive management of shoulder pain. The impact of the guideline in clinical practice requires further evaluation. SIGNIFICANCE Shoulder pain of any duration can be effectively treated with laser therapy, multimodal care (i.e., heat/cold, joint mobilization, range of motion exercise), or cervicothoracic manipulation and mobilization. Shoulder pain (>3 months) can be effectively treated with exercises, laser acupuncture, or general physician care (information, advice, and pharmacological pain management if necessary).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hainan Yu
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.,Undergraduate Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pierre Côté
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.,Canada Research Chair in Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.,Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jessica J Wong
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.,Graduate Education and Research Programs, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Heather M Shearer
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.,Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Silvano Mior
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.,Graduate Education and Research Programs, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carol Cancelliere
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Arthur Ameis
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Linda J Carroll
- School of Public Health and Injury Prevention Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Margareta Nordin
- Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Environmental Medicine, Occupational and Industrial Orthopedic Center, NYU School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sharanya Varatharajan
- Undergraduate Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Graduate Education and Research Programs, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Deborah Sutton
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danielle Southerst
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Craig Jacobs
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Clinical Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maja Stupar
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anne Taylor-Vaisey
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Douglas P Gross
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.,Rehabilitation Research Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Robert J Brison
- Clinical Research, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mike Paulden
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Carlo Ammendolia
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute for Work and Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - J David Cassidy
- Divison of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Richard N Bohay
- Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,College of Dentistry, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | | | - Michel Lacerte
- Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brindisino F, Ristori D, Lorusso M, Miele S, Pellicciari L, Rossettini G, Bonetti F, Heick JD, Testa M. Subacromial impingement syndrome: a survey of Italian physiotherapists and orthopaedics on diagnostic strategies and management modalities. Arch Physiother 2020; 10:16. [PMID: 32905154 PMCID: PMC7465722 DOI: 10.1186/s40945-020-00087-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM The subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) represents a common cause of disability in approximately 74% of patients with Shoulder Pain (SP). Even if contemporary research suggests that this mechanism is not (always) the dominant driver in SP, SIS is still a source of debate among scholars and clinicians. From a clinical point of view, evidence has suggested that clinicians can use both medical and physiotherapy approaches as effective methods to treat SIS.This survey aims to investigate models of management of patients with SIS in a sample of Italian physiotherapist specialists (Orthopaedic Manipulative Physical Therapists, -OMPTs-) and orthopaedic surgeons. MATERIALS AND METHODS An online survey with 29-item questionnaire was administered to assess the knowledge of OMPTs and orthopaedic surgeons about: a) strategies of clinical examination; b) the role of imaging in the diagnostic process; c) the physiotherapy management; and d) the pharmacological and surgical management in patients with SIS. RESULTS Six-hundred and twenty-nine respondents completed the survey (511 OMPTs (79.97%) and 128 orthopaedic surgeons (20.03%)). Ninety-two percent (n = 470) of the OMPTs and 80.5% (n = 103) of orthopaedic surgeons stated that in patients with SIS, a combination of diagnostic tests produced better accuracy (p = < 0.001). Twenty point seven % of OMPTs (n = 106) and 4.7% of orthopaedic surgeon (n = 6) stated that the Lift off was the most specific test (p = < 0.001). Four-hundred-and-twenty-four OMPTs (83%) and 40 orthopaedic surgeons (31.3%) answered that the gold standard for diagnosis of a patient with SIS are history and clinical examination (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION OMPTs and orthopaedic surgeons approach patients with SIS differently during both the assessment and the treatment. OMPTs appear to be appropriate in planning and managing clinical examination and therapeutic strategies to use with patients with SIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Brindisino
- Department of Medicine and Health Science “Vincenzo Tiberio”, University of Molise C/da Tappino c/o Cardarelli Hospital, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Diego Ristori
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophtalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health – University of Genova – Campus of Savona, Savona, Italy
| | - Mariangela Lorusso
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Simone Miele
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophtalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health – University of Genova – Campus of Savona, Savona, Italy
| | | | - Giacomo Rossettini
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophtalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health – University of Genova – Campus of Savona, Savona, Italy
| | - Francesca Bonetti
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - John Duane Heick
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, Flagstaff, AZ USA
| | - Marco Testa
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophtalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health – University of Genova – Campus of Savona, Savona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nazari G, MacDermid JC, Bobos P. Conservative versus Surgical Interventions for Shoulder Impingement: An Overview of Systematic Reviews of Randomized Controlled Trials. Physiother Can 2020; 72:282-297. [PMID: 35110797 DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2018-0111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: Numerous systematic reviews (SRs) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have emerged that investigate the effectiveness of conservative (supervised exercises) versus surgical (arthroscopic subacromial decompression) interventions for patients with shoulder impingement; however, there are disparities in the quality of the evidence synthesized. The purpose of this study was to conduct an overview of SRs of RCTs to critically appraise the evidence and establish the current state of effectiveness of conservative versus surgical interventions on clinical outcomes among patients with shoulder impingement. Method: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PubMed electronic databases were searched for January 2008 to September 2018, and we found SRs of RCTs of patients with shoulder impingement, subacromial pain syndrome, or subacromial impingement syndrome who had received conservative versus surgical interventions to improve outcomes. Two authors extracted the data, and two independent review authors assessed the risk of bias and quality. Results: A total of 15 SRs were identified. One was rated as high quality, 7 as moderate quality, 5 as low quality, and 2 as critically low quality. The results were in line with one another, indicating that no differences in outcomes existed between conservative and surgical interventions among patients with shoulder impingement. Conclusion: There were no clinically important or statistically significant differences in outcomes between conservative versus surgical interventions among patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. To enhance clinical outcomes in this patient population, shoulder-specific exercises that aim to improve muscle strength and flexibility must be considered as the first line of conservative treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Goris Nazari
- School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences.,Collaborative Program in Musculoskeletal Health Research, Bone and Joint Institute, Western University
| | - Joy C MacDermid
- School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences.,Collaborative Program in Musculoskeletal Health Research, Bone and Joint Institute, Western University.,Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Hospital, London, Ont
| | - Pavlos Bobos
- School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences.,Collaborative Program in Musculoskeletal Health Research, Bone and Joint Institute, Western University
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
An Update of Systematic Reviews Examining the Effectiveness of Conservative Physical Therapy Interventions for Subacromial Shoulder Pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2020; 50:131-141. [PMID: 31726927 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2020.8498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To update a systematic review published in 2013 that focused on evaluating the effectiveness of interventions within the scope of physical therapy, including exercise, manual therapy, electrotherapy, and combined or multimodal approaches to managing shoulder pain. DESIGN Umbrella review. LITERATURE SEARCH An electronic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and CINAHL was undertaken. Methodological quality was assessed using the AMSTAR (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews) checklist for systematic reviews. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA Nonsurgical treatments for subacromial shoulder pain. DATA SYNTHESIS Sixteen systematic reviews were retrieved. Results were summarized qualitatively. RESULTS A strong recommendation can be made for exercise therapy as the first-line treatment to improve pain, mobility, and function in patients with subacromial shoulder pain. Manual therapy may be integrated, with a strong recommendation, as additional therapy. There was moderate evidence of no effect for other commonly prescribed interventions, such as laser therapy, extracorporeal shockwave therapy, pulsed electromagnetic energy, and ultrasound. CONCLUSION There is a growing body of evidence to support exercise therapy as an intervention for subacromial shoulder pain. Ongoing research is required to provide guidance on exercise type, dose, duration, and expected outcomes. A strong recommendation may be made regarding the inclusion of manual therapy in the initial treatment phase. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2020;50(3):131-141. Epub 15 Nov 2019. doi:10.2519/jospt.2020.8498.
Collapse
|
8
|
Ager AL, Roy JS, Gamache F, Hébert LJ. The Effectiveness of an Upper Extremity Neuromuscular Training Program on the Shoulder Function of Military Members With a Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Mil Med 2020; 184:e385-e393. [PMID: 30423137 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usy294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2018] [Revised: 09/26/2018] [Accepted: 10/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Shoulder pain, a leading reason to consult a physician or physiotherapist, continues to be a challenge to rehabilitate, particularly with a military population. A rotator cuff (RC) tendinopathy, the most important source of shoulder pain, is one of the leading reasons for sick leave or a discharge from active military service. Research encourages the use of exercise prescription for the management of a RC tendinopathy, however the ideal method of delivery (group setting versus one-on-one) remains uncertain. The purpose of this single-blind (evaluator) pilot randomized clinical trial was to compare two 6-week rehabilitation programs, a newly developed group-supervised neuromuscular training program and usual one-on-one physiotherapy care, on the pain and symptoms of Canadian soldiers affected by a RC tendinopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-one soldiers with the Canadian Armed Forces were randomly assigned to (1) a group-supervised neuromuscular training program (UPEx-NTP) or; (2) one-on-one usual physiotherapy care (UPC). The primary outcome was the Disability of Arm, Hand and Shoulder (DASH) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Index, pain levels at rest, and maximum isometric voluntary contractions (MIVC) of the abductors and external (lateral) rotators of the affected shoulder. Both were assessed at baseline (T0), 6 (T6) and 12 (T12) weeks. Analysis included two-way repeated measures of variance for intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol analyses. RESULTS Eighty military members with a RC tendinopathy were contacted, resulting in 31 participants who were randomized for their active intervention, in the UPEx-NTP or UPC, respectively. No significant group (p ≥ 0.16) or group × time interactions (p ≥ 0.11) were found for either ITT or per-protocol analyses. A statistically significant time effect (p < 0.001) was established for the DASH and WORC, showing that both groups improved over time. CONCLUSIONS Our preliminary data demonstrates that both rehabilitation approaches, grounded in active exercises, were not statistically different from each other, and derived similar benefits over time for a military population. This suggests that a group intervention for a RC tendinopathy has potential to be just as effective as a one-on-one approach for a military population, an interesting avenue for an active working population. Larger sample sizes and further investigation are warranted regarding the cost and clinical resource benefits of a supervised group approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda L Ager
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Rehabilitation Institute, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jean-Sébastien Roy
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Rehabilitation Institute, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Canada
| | - France Gamache
- Physiotherapy Department, Valcartier Garrison, Canadian Armed Forces, Quebec, Canada
| | - Luc J Hébert
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Rehabilitation Institute, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Radiology/Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Canada.,1 Canadian Field Hospital, Detachment Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rodriguez-Santiago B, Castillo B, Baerga-Varela L, Micheo WF. Rehabilitation Management of Rotator Cuff Injuries in the Master Athlete. Curr Sports Med Rep 2019; 18:330-337. [PMID: 31503045 DOI: 10.1249/jsr.0000000000000628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Rotator cuff (RTC) injuries are common in master athletes, especially overhead athletes. Risk factors include aging and degeneration as nonmodifiable and volume of activity, muscle weakness, and loss of motion as modifiable. The clinical presentation involves limited range of motion (ROM), pain at rest and at night. Injury classification into traumatic versus nontraumatic and tendinopathy, partial or full-thickness tears helps to establish a treatment plan. RTC injury rehabilitation protocols are criteria-based, multimodal, and divided into four phases. The acute phase addresses pain, inflammation, ROM, and RTC protection. The recovery phase addresses kinetic chain abnormalities, flexibility, and strength, and the functional phase involves exercises directed toward specific sport activities. Return to sports is based on clinical recovery, kinetic chain principles, and adequate sports technique. Nonsurgical management is recommended in most cases, and surgical management is considered if symptoms progress, especially for full-thickness tears.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belmarie Rodriguez-Santiago
- Department of Physical Medicine, Rehabilitation, and Sports Medicine, University of Puerto Rico, School of Medicine, San Juan, PUERTO RICO
| | - Brenda Castillo
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department-MossRehab, Elkins Park, PA
| | - Luis Baerga-Varela
- Department of Physical Medicine, Rehabilitation, and Sports Medicine, University of Puerto Rico, School of Medicine, San Juan, PUERTO RICO
| | - William F Micheo
- Department of Physical Medicine, Rehabilitation, and Sports Medicine, University of Puerto Rico, School of Medicine, San Juan, PUERTO RICO
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cook JA, Merritt N, Rees JL, Crocker JC, Hopewell S, Dritsaki M, Beard DJ, Rangan A, Cooper C, Kottam L, Farrar-Hockley D, Thomas M, Earle R, Carr AJ. Patch-augmented rotator cuff surgery (PARCS) study-protocol for a feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2018; 4:188. [PMID: 30598834 PMCID: PMC6302398 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-018-0380-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2018] [Accepted: 12/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A rotator cuff tear is a common disabling shoulder problem. Symptoms include pain, weakness, lack of shoulder mobility and sleep disturbance. Many patients require surgery to repair the tear; however, there is a high failure rate. There is a pressing need to improve the outcome of rotator cuff surgery and the use of patch augmentation to provide support to the healing process and improve patient outcomes holds new promise. Patches have been made using different materials (e.g. human/animal skin or intestine tissue, and completely synthetic materials) and processes (e.g. woven or a mesh). However, clinical evidence on their use is limited. The aim of the patch-augmented rotator cuff surgery (PARCS) feasibility study is to determine, using a mixed method approach, the design of a definitive randomised trial assessing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a patch to augment surgical repair of the rotator cuff that is both acceptable to stakeholders and feasible. METHODS The objectives of this six-stage mixed methods feasibility study are to determine current practice, evidence and views about patch use; achieve consensus on the design of a randomised trial to evaluate patch-augmented rotator cuff surgery; and assess the acceptability and feasibility of the proposed design. The six stages will involve a systematic review of clinical evidence, two surveys of surgeons, focus groups and interviews with stakeholders, a Delphi study and a consensus meeting. The various stakeholders (including patients, surgeons, and representatives from industry, the NHS and regulatory bodies) will be involved across the six stages. DISCUSSION The PARCS feasibility study will inform the feasibility and acceptability of a randomised trial of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a patch-augmented rotator cuff surgery. Consensus opinion on the basic design of a randomised trial will be sought. TRIAL REGISTRATION Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan A Cook
- 1Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- 2NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Naomi Merritt
- 2NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jonathan L Rees
- 2NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Joanna C Crocker
- 3Health Experiences Research Group, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- 4NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sally Hopewell
- 1Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Melina Dritsaki
- 1Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David J Beard
- 2NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Amar Rangan
- 2NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- 5The James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Cushla Cooper
- 2NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Lucksy Kottam
- 5The James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Dair Farrar-Hockley
- 2NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Michael Thomas
- 6Frimley Park Hospital, Frimley Park Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, UK
| | - Robert Earle
- 2NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew J Carr
- 2NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gomes CAFDP, Dibai-Filho AV, Politti F, Gonzalez TDO, Biasotto-Gonzalez DA. Combined Use of Diadynamic Currents and Manual Therapy on Myofascial Trigger Points in Patients With Shoulder Impingement Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2018; 41:475-482. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2017] [Revised: 10/26/2017] [Accepted: 10/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
12
|
Koca TT, Arslan A, Özdemir F, Acet G. Clinical features of patients diagnosed with degenerative rotator cuff tendon disease: a 6-month prospective-definitive clinical study from turkey. J Phys Ther Sci 2017; 29:1433-1437. [PMID: 28878478 PMCID: PMC5574353 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.29.1433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2017] [Accepted: 05/26/2017] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
[Purpose] In rotator cuff tendon disease (RCTD), anamnesis is as important as clinical
findings and anatomic/radio diagnostic examination. This study aimed to investigate the
clinical features of patients diagnosed with RCTD using clinical and radiological methods
between March 2015 and August 2015 at Malatya Research and Training Hospital Physical
Medicine and Rehabilitation department. [Subjects and Methods] The study included 178
patients who were diagnosed with RCTD (128 females and 50 males). A questionnaire
comprising 33 questions was given to each patient. [Results] Eighty-eight of the patients
(49.9%) had an involvement on their right side, eighty-four (47.1%) had an involvement on
their left side, and 6 had bilateral involvement. Mean visual analog scale (VAS) score was
found to be statistically significant in favor of female patients. A statistically
significant correlation was found between educational status and VAS. The body mass index
(BMI) of the female patients was found to be higher than that of the male patients.
Statistically significant correlation between doing risky work and gender showed that
males were at a higher risk. [Conclusion] RCDT is more seen in people who have high BMI
and are at their 50s. Pain complaint and BMI were found higher in female patients. DM,
thyroid and cardiac diseases were seen more in the patients who are diagnosed with RCTD
relative to the healthy population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuba Tülay Koca
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic, Research and Training Hospital, Turkey
| | - Aydın Arslan
- Orthopedics and Traumatology Clinic, Research and Training Hospital, Turkey
| | - Filiz Özdemir
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Inonu University, Turkey
| | - Günseli Acet
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic, Research and Training Hospital, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hawk C, Minkalis AL, Khorsan R, Daniels CJ, Homack D, Gliedt JA, Hartman JA, Bhalerao S. Systematic Review of Nondrug, Nonsurgical Treatment of Shoulder Conditions. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2017; 40:293-319. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2017] [Revised: 04/03/2017] [Accepted: 04/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
14
|
Wright AA, Hegedus EJ, Tarara DT, Ray SC, Dischiavi SL. Exercise prescription for overhead athletes with shoulder pathology: a systematic review with best evidence synthesis. Br J Sports Med 2017; 52:231-237. [PMID: 28404557 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/17/2017] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To produce a best evidence synthesis of exercise prescription used when treating shoulder pathology in the overhead athlete. DESIGN A systematic review of exercises used in overhead athletes including case studies and clinical commentaries. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, PubMed, SPORTDiscus and CINAHL from database inception through July 8, 2016. METHODS We examined data from randomised controlled trials and prospective cohort (level I-IV evidence) studies that addressed exercise intervention in the rehabilitation of the overhead athlete with shoulder pathology. Case studies and clinical commentaries (level V evidence) were examined to account for expert opinion-based research. Data were combined using best evidence synthesis and graded (A-F) recommendations (Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine). RESULTS There were 33 unique exercises in six level I-IV studies that met our inclusion criteria. Most exercises were single-plane, upper extremity exercises performed below 90o of elevation. There were 102 unique exercises in 33 level V studies that met our inclusion criteria. These exercises emphasised plyometrics, kinetic chain and sport-specific training. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Overall, evidence for exercise interventions in overhead athletes with shoulder pathology is dominated by expert opinion (grade D). There is great variability between exercise approaches suggested by experts and those investigated in research studies and the overall level of evidence is low. The strongest available evidence (level B) supports the use of single-plane, open chain upper extremity exercises performed below 90° of elevation and closed chain upper extremity exercises. Clinical expert pieces support a more advanced, global treatment approach consistent with the complex, multidimensional nature of sport.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis A Wright
- Department of Physical Therapy, High Point University, High Point, North Carolina, USA
| | - Eric J Hegedus
- Department of Physical Therapy, High Point University, High Point, North Carolina, USA
| | - Daniel T Tarara
- Department of Exercise Science, High Point University, High Point, North Carolina, USA
| | - Samantha C Ray
- Department of Physical Therapy, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Steven L Dischiavi
- Department of Physical Therapy, High Point University, High Point, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|