1
|
MacDonald LA, Johnson CY, Lu ML, Santiago-Colón A, Adam GP, Kimmel HJ, Napolitano PG, Saldanha IJ. Physical job demands in pregnancy and associated musculoskeletal health and employment outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024; 230:583-599.e16. [PMID: 38109950 PMCID: PMC11139607 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A decline in musculoskeletal health during pregnancy is an underappreciated adverse outcome of pregnancy that can have immediate and long-term health consequences. High physical job demands are known risk factors for nontraumatic musculoskeletal disorders in the general working population. Evidence from meta-analyses suggest that occupational lifting and prolonged standing during pregnancy may increase risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. This systematic review examined associations between occupational lifting or postural load in pregnancy and associated musculoskeletal disorders and related sequalae. DATA SOURCES Five electronic databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, NIOSHTIC-2, and Ergonomic Abstracts) were searched from 1990 to July 2022 for studies in any language. A Web of Science snowball search was performed in December 2022. Reference lists were manually reviewed. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Eligible studies reported associations between occupational lifting or postural load and musculoskeletal health or sequelae (eg, employment outcomes) among pregnant and postpartum workers. METHODS Data were extracted using a customized form to document study and sample characteristics; and details of exposures, outcomes, covariates, and analyses. Investigators independently assessed study quality for 7 risk-of-bias domains and overall utility, with discrepant ratings resolved through discussion. A narrative synthesis was conducted due to heterogeneity. RESULTS Sixteen studies (11 cohort studies, 2 nested case-control studies, and 3 cross-sectional studies) from 8 countries were included (N=142,320 pregnant and N=1744 postpartum workers). Limited but consistent evidence with variable quality ratings, ranging from critical concern to high, suggests that pregnant workers exposed to heavy lifting (usually defined as ≥22 lbs or ≥10 kg) may be at increased risk of functionally limiting pelvic girdle pain and antenatal leave. Moreover, reports of dose-response relationships suggest graded risk levels according to lifting frequency, ranging from 21% to 45% for pelvic girdle pain and 58% to 202% for antenatal leave. Limited but consistent evidence also suggests that postural load increases the risk of employment cessation. CONCLUSION Limited but consistent evidence suggests that pregnant workers exposed to heavy lifting and postural load are at increased risk of pelvic girdle pain and employment cessation. Job accommodations to reduce exposure levels may promote safe sustainable employment for pregnant workers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie A MacDonald
- Division of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Cincinnati, OH.
| | - Candice Y Johnson
- Division of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Cincinnati, OH; Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Ming-Lun Lu
- Division of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Cincinnati, OH
| | - Albeliz Santiago-Colón
- World Trade Center Health Program, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Gaelen P Adam
- Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI
| | | | - Peter G Napolitano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Ian J Saldanha
- Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI; Center for Clinical Trials and Evidence Synthesis, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vining R, Smith J, Anderson B, Almquist Z, Wong D. Developing an initial set of quality indicators for chiropractic care: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:65. [PMID: 38216977 PMCID: PMC10785553 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10561-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality indicators are standardized, evidence-based measures of health care quality. Currently, there is no basic set of quality indicators for chiropractic care published in peer-reviewed literature. The goal of this research is to develop a preliminary set of quality indicators, measurable with administrative data. METHODS We conducted a scoping review searching PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Index to Chiropractic Literature databases. Eligible articles were published after 2011, in English, developing/reporting best practices and clinical guidelines specifically developed for, or directly applicable to, chiropractic care. Eligible non-peer-reviewed sources such as quality measures published by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Royal College of Chiropractors quality standards were also included. Following a stepwise eligibility determination process, data abstraction identified specific statements from included sources that can conceivably be measured with administrative data. Once identified, statements were transformed into potential indicators by: 1) Generating a brief title and description; 2) Documenting a source; 3) Developing a metric; and 4) Assigning a Donabedian category (structure, process, outcome). Draft indicators then traversed a 5-step assessment: 1) Describes a narrowly defined structure, process, or outcome; 2) Quantitative data can conceivably be available; 3) Performance is achievable; 4) Metric is relevant; 5) Data are obtainable within reasonable time limits. Indicators meeting all criteria were included in the final set. RESULTS Literature searching revealed 2562 articles. After removing duplicates and conducting eligibility determination, 18 remained. Most were clinical guidelines (n = 10) and best practice recommendations (n = 6), with 1 consensus and 1 clinical standards development study. Data abstraction and transformation produced 204 draft quality indicators. Of those, 57 did not meet 1 or more assessment criteria. After removing duplicates, 70 distinct indicators remained. Most indicators matched the Donabedian category of process (n = 35), with 31 structure and 4 outcome indicators. No sources were identified to support indicator development from patient perspectives. CONCLUSIONS This article proposes a preliminary set of 70 quality indicators for chiropractic care, theoretically measurable with administrative data and largely obtained from electronic health records. Future research should assess feasibility, achieve stakeholder consensus, develop additional indicators including those considering patient perspectives, and study relationships with clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION Open Science Framework, https://osf.io/t7kgm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Vining
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, 1000 Brady St, Davenport, IA, USA.
| | - Jennifer Smith
- Palmer College of Chiropractic, 1000 Brady St, Davenport, IA, USA
| | - Brian Anderson
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, 1000 Brady St, Davenport, IA, USA
| | - Zachary Almquist
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, 1000 Brady St, Davenport, IA, USA
| | - Danveshka Wong
- Palmer College of Chiropractic, 1000 Brady St, Davenport, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Daniels CJ, Cupler ZA, Napuli JG, Walsh RW, Ziegler AML, Meyer KW, Knieper MJ, Walters SA, Salsbury SA, Trager RJ, Gliedt JA, Young MD, Anderson KR, Kirk EJ, Mooring SA, Battaglia PJ, Paris DJ, Brown AG, Goehl JM, Hawk C. Development of Preliminary Integrated Health Care Clinical Competencies for United States Doctor of Chiropractic Programs: A Modified Delphi Consensus Process. GLOBAL ADVANCES IN INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE AND HEALTH 2024; 13:27536130241275944. [PMID: 39157778 PMCID: PMC11329915 DOI: 10.1177/27536130241275944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2024] [Revised: 07/23/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 08/20/2024]
Abstract
Background There has been rapid growth of chiropractors pursuing career opportunities in both public and private hospitals and other integrated care settings. Chiropractors that prosper in integrated care settings deliver patient-centered care, focus on the institutional mission, understand and adhere to organizational rules, and are proficient in navigating complex systems. The Council on Chiropractic Education Accreditation Standards do not outline specific meta-competencies for integrated care clinical training. Objective The purpose of this study was to develop preliminary integrated health care competencies for DC programs to guide the advancement of clinical chiropractic education. Methods A systematic literature search was performed. Articles were screened for eligibility and extracted in duplicate. Domains and seed statements were generated from this literature, piloted at a conference workshop, and evaluated via a modified Delphi consensus process. Of 42 invited, 36 chiropractors participated as panelists. Public comment period yielded 20 comments, none resulting in substantive changes to the competencies. Results Of 1718 citations, 23 articles met eligibility criteria. After 2 modified Delphi rounds, consensus was reached on all competency statements. A total of 78 competency statements were agreed upon, which encompassed 4 domains and 11 subdomains. The 4 domains were: 1) Collaboration, (2) Clinical Excellence, (3) Communication, and (4) Systems Administration. Conclusion We identified 78 preliminary competencies appropriate for preparing DC students and early career chiropractors for clinical practice in integrated healthcare settings. Educational programs may consider these competencies for curricular design and reform to strengthen DC program graduates for integrated practice, advanced training, and employment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clinton J Daniels
- Rehabilitation Care Services, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Tacoma, WA, USA
- Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Zachary A Cupler
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Services, Butler VA Health Care, Butler PA, USA
- Institute of Clinical Research Education, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jason G Napuli
- Primary Care Services-Whole Health, VA St. Louis Health Care System, St. Louis, MO, USA
- College of Chiropractic, Logan University, Chesterfield, MO, USA
| | - Robert W Walsh
- Integrated Primary Care Service, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
- Palmer College of Chiropractic, Palmer West College of Chiropractic, San Jose, CA, USA
| | - Anna-Marie L Ziegler
- Primary Care Services-Whole Health, VA St. Louis Health Care System, St. Louis, MO, USA
- College of Chiropractic, Logan University, Chesterfield, MO, USA
| | - Kevin W Meyer
- Rehabilitation Care Services, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Tacoma, WA, USA
| | - Matthew J Knieper
- Primary Care Services-Whole Health, VA St. Louis Health Care System, St. Louis, MO, USA
- College of Chiropractic, Logan University, Chesterfield, MO, USA
| | | | - Stacie A Salsbury
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, IA, USA
| | - Robert J Trager
- Connor Whole Health, University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Family Medicine & Community Health, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jordan A Gliedt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Morgan D Young
- Washington State Department of Labor and Industries, Olympia, WA, USA
| | | | - Eric J Kirk
- Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee, WI, USA
- Southern California University of Health Sciences, Whittier, CA, USA
| | - Scott A Mooring
- Northwestern University Health Sciences, Bloomington, MN, USA
- Athletic Medicine Department, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Patrick J Battaglia
- Community-Based Clinical Education, University of Western States, Portland, OR, USA
| | - David J Paris
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, VA Northern California Health Care, Redding, CA, USA
- Mercy Medical Center Mt. Shasta, Mount Shasta, CA, USA
| | - Amanda G Brown
- Center for Integrative Medicine, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Justin M Goehl
- Family Medicine, Dartmouth Health, Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Cheryl Hawk
- Texas Chiropractic College, Pasadena, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Morham S, Reichardt A, Toth A, Olin G, Pohlman K, Passmore SR. Patient Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes Associated With Conservative Treatment for Spine Pain in Women Experiencing Socioeconomic Challenges. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2022; 45:633-640. [PMID: 37294217 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2023.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to describe patient demographics and pain changes for women over the course of care in a chiropractic program. METHODS We performed a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of a prospective quality assurance database from the Mount Carmel Clinic (MCC) in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. Pain scores were reported on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale. Baseline and discharge Numeric Rating Scale scores were compared for each spinal and extremity region through Wilcoxon signed rank tests to determine if clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences were present. RESULTS The sample population attained was 348 primarily middle-aged (mean = 43.0, SD = 14.96) women with obesity (body mass index = 31.3 kg/m2, SD = 7.89) referred to the MCC chiropractic program by their primary care physician (65.2%) for an average of 15.6 (SD = 18.49) treatments. Clinically meaningful median baseline to discharge changes in pain by spine region were observed (Cervical = -2, Thoracic = -2, Lumbar = -3, Sacroiliac = -3), each of which yielded statistical significance (P < .001). CONCLUSION This retrospective analysis found that the MCC chiropractic program serves middle-aged women with obesity experiencing socioeconomic challenges. Pain reductions were reported, regardless of the region of complaint, temporally associated with a course of chiropractic care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Morham
- Faculty of Kinesiology & Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Amber Reichardt
- Faculty of Kinesiology & Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Audrey Toth
- Chiropractic Program, Mount Carmel Clinic, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Gerald Olin
- Canadian Chiropractic Protective Association, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | | - Steven R Passmore
- Faculty of Kinesiology & Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|