1
|
Zirone L, Bonanno E, Borzì GR, Cavalli N, D’Anna A, Galvagno R, Girlando A, Gueli AM, Pace M, Stella G, Marino C. HyperArc TM Dosimetric Validation for Multiple Targets Using Ionization Chamber and RT-100 Polymer Gel. Gels 2022; 8:481. [PMID: 36005082 PMCID: PMC9407338 DOI: 10.3390/gels8080481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple brain metastases single-isocenter stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment is increasingly employed in radiotherapy department. Before its use in clinical routine, it is recommended to perform end-to-end tests. In this work, we report the results of five HyperArcTM treatment plans obtained by both ionization chamber (IC) and polymer gel. The end-to-end tests were performed using a water equivalent Mobius Verification PhantomTM (MVP) and a 3D-printed anthropomorphic head phantom PseudoPatient® (PP) (RTsafe P.C., Athens, Greece); 2D and 3D dose distributions were evaluated on the PP phantom using polymer gel (RTsafe). Gels were read by 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Comparison between calculated and measured distributions was performed using gamma index passing rate evaluation by different criteria (5% 2 mm, 3% 2 mm, 5% 1 mm). Mean point dose differences of 1.01% [min −0.77%−max 2.89%] and 0.23% [min 0.01%−max 2.81%] were found in MVP and PP phantoms, respectively. For each target volume, the obtained results in terms of gamma index passing rate show an agreement >95% with 5% 2 mm and 3% 2 mm criteria for both 2D and 3D distributions. The obtained results confirmed that the use of a single isocenter for multiple lesions reduces the treatment time without compromising accuracy, even in the case of target volumes that are quite distant from the isocenter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Zirone
- Medical Physics Department, Humanitas Istituto Clinico Catanese, 95045 Catania, Italy; (L.Z.); (E.B.); (G.R.B.); (N.C.); (M.P.); (C.M.)
| | - Elisa Bonanno
- Medical Physics Department, Humanitas Istituto Clinico Catanese, 95045 Catania, Italy; (L.Z.); (E.B.); (G.R.B.); (N.C.); (M.P.); (C.M.)
| | - Giuseppina Rita Borzì
- Medical Physics Department, Humanitas Istituto Clinico Catanese, 95045 Catania, Italy; (L.Z.); (E.B.); (G.R.B.); (N.C.); (M.P.); (C.M.)
| | - Nina Cavalli
- Medical Physics Department, Humanitas Istituto Clinico Catanese, 95045 Catania, Italy; (L.Z.); (E.B.); (G.R.B.); (N.C.); (M.P.); (C.M.)
| | - Alessia D’Anna
- Department of Physics and Astronomy E. Majorana, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy; (A.D.); (R.G.); (A.M.G.)
| | - Rosaria Galvagno
- Department of Physics and Astronomy E. Majorana, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy; (A.D.); (R.G.); (A.M.G.)
| | - Andrea Girlando
- Radiotherapy Department, Humanitas Istituto Clinico Catanese, 95045 Catania, Italy;
| | - Anna Maria Gueli
- Department of Physics and Astronomy E. Majorana, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy; (A.D.); (R.G.); (A.M.G.)
| | - Martina Pace
- Medical Physics Department, Humanitas Istituto Clinico Catanese, 95045 Catania, Italy; (L.Z.); (E.B.); (G.R.B.); (N.C.); (M.P.); (C.M.)
| | - Giuseppe Stella
- Department of Physics and Astronomy E. Majorana, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy; (A.D.); (R.G.); (A.M.G.)
| | - Carmelo Marino
- Medical Physics Department, Humanitas Istituto Clinico Catanese, 95045 Catania, Italy; (L.Z.); (E.B.); (G.R.B.); (N.C.); (M.P.); (C.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Song AJ, Shi W, Ellenbogen RG, Venur VA, Lo SS. Commentary: Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intracranial Noncavernous Sinus Benign Meningioma: International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Practice Guideline. Neurosurgery 2020; 87:E537-E538. [PMID: 32570276 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Wenyin Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Richard G Ellenbogen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Vyshak Alva Venur
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fatima N, Meola A, Pollom EL, Soltys SG, Chang SD. Stereotactic radiosurgery versus stereotactic radiotherapy in the management of intracranial meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Focus 2019; 46:E2. [DOI: 10.3171/2019.3.focus1970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Accepted: 03/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVEStereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) have been used as a primary treatment or adjuvant to resection in the management of intracranial meningiomas (ICMs). The aim of this analysis is to compare the safety and long-term efficacy of SRS and SRT in patients with primary or recurrent ICMs.METHODSA systematic review of the literature comparing SRT and SRS in the same study was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and EMBASE from January 1980 to December 2018. Randomized controlled trials, case-control studies, and cohort studies (prospective and retrospective) analyzing SRS versus SRT for the treatment of ICMs in adult patients (age > 16 years) were included. Pooled and subgroup analyses were based on the fixed-effect model.RESULTSA total of 1736 patients from 12 retrospective studies were included. The treatment modality used was: 1) SRS (n = 306), including Gamma Knife surgery (n = 36), linear accelerator (n = 261), and CyberKnife (n = 9); or 2) SRT (n = 1430), including hypofractionated SRT (hFSRT, n = 268) and full-fractionated SRT (FSRT, n = 1162). The median age of patients at the time of treatment was 59 years. The median follow-up duration after treatment was 35.5 months. The median tumor volumes at the time of treatment with SRS, hFSRT, and FSRT were 2.84 cm3, 5.45 cm3, and 12.75 cm3, respectively. The radiographic tumor control at last follow-up was significantly worse in patients who underwent SRS than SRT (odds ratio [OR] 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27–0.82, p = 0.007) with 7% less volume of tumor shrinkage (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.61–1.40, p = 0.72). Compared to SRS, the radiographic tumor control was better achieved by FSRT (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26–0.80, p = 0.006) than by hFSRT (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.21–3.17, p = 0.76). Moreover, SRS leads to a significantly higher risk of clinical neurological worsening during follow-up (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.06–4.06, p = 0.03) and of immediate symptomatic edema (OR 4.58, 95% CI 1.67–12.56, p = 0.003) with respect to SRT. SRT could produce a better progression-free survival at 4–10 years compared to SRS, but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.29).CONCLUSIONSSRS and SRT are both safe options in the management of ICMs. However, SRT carries a better radiographic tumor control rate and a lower incidence of posttreatment symptomatic worsening and symptomatic edema, with respect to SRS. However, further prospective studies are still needed to validate these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nida Fatima
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto; and
| | - Antonio Meola
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto; and
| | - Erqi L. Pollom
- 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Scott G. Soltys
- 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Steven D. Chang
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto; and
| |
Collapse
|