Functional neuronal anisotropy assessed with neuronavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation

Closed-loop optimization of transcranial magnetic stimulation with electroencephalography feedback

Background

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is widely used in brain research and treatment of various brain dysfunctions. However, the optimal way to target stimulation and administer TMS therapies, for example, where and in which electric field direction the stimuli should be given, is yet to be determined.

Objective

To develop an automated closed-loop system for adjusting TMS parameters (in this work, the stimulus orientation) online based on TMS-evoked brain activity measured with electroencephalography (EEG).

Methods

We developed an automated closed-loop TMS–EEG set-up. In this set-up, the stimulus parameters are electronically adjusted with multi-locus TMS. As a proof of concept, we developed an algorithm that automatically optimizes the stimulation orientation based on single-trial EEG responses. We applied the algorithm to determine the electric field orientation that maximizes the amplitude of the TMS–EEG responses. The validation of the algorithm was performed with six healthy volunteers, repeating the search twenty times for each subject.

Results

The validation demonstrated that the closed-loop control worked as desired despite the large variation in the single-trial EEG responses. We were often able to get close to the orientation that maximizes the EEG amplitude with only a few tens of pulses.

Conclusion

Optimizing stimulation with EEG feedback in a closed-loop manner is feasible and enables effective coupling to brain activity.

•

Closed-loop set-up for guiding TMS with brain activity feedback.

•

Automatic stimulus orientation optimization based on TMS-evoked EEG responses.

•

Adjusting TMS parameters electronically allows fast and effortless procedures.

•

TMS-evoked EEG responses depend on the stimulus orientation.

Causal decoding of individual cortical excitability states

Brain responsiveness to stimulation fluctuates with rapidly shifting cortical excitability state, as reflected by oscillations in the electroencephalogram (EEG). For example, the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of motor cortex changes from trial to trial. To date, individual estimation of the cortical processes leading to this excitability fluctuation has not been possible. Here, we propose a data-driven method to derive individually optimized EEG classifiers in healthy humans using a supervised learning approach that relates pre-TMS EEG activity dynamics to MEP amplitude. Our approach enables considering multiple brain regions and frequency bands, without defining them a priori, whose compound phase-pattern information determines the excitability. The individualized classifier leads to an increased classification accuracy of cortical excitability states from 57% to 67% when compared to μ-oscillation phase extracted by standard fixed spatial filters. Results show that, for the used TMS protocol, excitability fluctuates predominantly in the μ-oscillation range, and relevant cortical areas cluster around the stimulated motor cortex, but between subjects there is variability in relevant power spectra, phases, and cortical regions. This novel decoding method allows causal investigation of the cortical excitability state, which is critical also for individualizing therapeutic brain stimulation.

Mapping of Motor Function with Neuronavigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Review on Clinical Application in Brain Tumors and Methods for Ensuring Feasible Accuracy

Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) has developed into a reliable non-invasive clinical and scientific tool over the past decade. Specifically, it has undergone several validating clinical trials that demonstrated high agreement with intraoperative direct electrical stimulation (DES), which paved the way for increasing application for the purpose of motor mapping in patients harboring motor-eloquent intracranial neoplasms. Based on this clinical use case of the technique, in this article we review the evidence for the feasibility of motor mapping and derived models (risk stratification and prediction, nTMS-based fiber tracking, improvement of clinical outcome, and assessment of functional plasticity), and provide collected sets of evidence for the applicability of quantitative mapping with nTMS. In addition, we provide evidence-based demonstrations on factors that ensure methodological feasibility and accuracy of the motor mapping procedure. We demonstrate that selection of the stimulation intensity (SI) for nTMS and spatial density of stimuli are crucial factors for applying motor mapping accurately, while also demonstrating the effect on the motor maps. We conclude that while the application of nTMS motor mapping has been impressively spread over the past decade, there are still variations in the applied protocols and parameters, which could be optimized for the purpose of reliable quantitative mapping.

The effect of coil placement and orientation on the assessment of focal excitability in motor mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation

BACKGROUND

Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is used for mapping muscle representations in the primary motor cortex. We used sulcus-aligned mapping and electric field (E-field) modeling to investigate the excitability of the motor hand area for further understanding the methodological limitations of nTMS.

NEW METHOD

We studied 10 healthy volunteers to locate the cortical target eliciting the largest responses (the hotspot) in the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. Six additional targets were placed along the central sulcus at 5-mm distances. Resting motor thresholds (rMTs) and optimal coil orientations were determined at all targets, and a conventional motor mapping was conducted. The cortical E-fields, induced by stimulating the targets with rMT intensities and optimal coil orientations, were modeled in a realistic head geometry to estimate the activated cortical sites.

RESULTS

The rMTs increased with increasing distance from the hotspot (p < 0.001). The greatest motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes occurred with the coil perpendicular to the sulcus and with the coil pointing towards the hotspot or the center of gravity of the motor map. The E-field strengths at the hotspot (99±26 V/m) remained above previously estimated thresholds for activation.

COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS

Depending on the target location, optimal coil orientations may deviate significantly from the conventional perpendicular-to-sulcus angle, which is often assumed optimal. These orientations seem to maintain the E-field stable in the hand knob, regardless of the sulcal shape near the stimulated target.

CONCLUSIONS

The coil orientation is crucial for the accuracy of motor mapping, and the apparent motor map may extend due to remote hotspot activation.

Functional and structural cortical characteristics after restricted focal motor cortical infarction evaluated at chronic stage - Indications from a preliminary study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the inter-hemispheric differences in neuronal function and structure of the motor cortex in a small group of chronic stroke patients having suffered a restricted ischemic lesion affecting hand motor representation. GABAergic intracortical inhibition, known to be affected by stroke lesion, was also investigated.

METHODS

Eight patients exhibiting little or no motor impairment were studied using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) >15months from diagnosis. Resting motor threshold (MT) for 50μV and 2mV motor evoked potentials, and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) were measured from hand muscles. Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were analyzed from the DWI for the primary motor cortex (M1), the supplementary motor area (SMA) and thalamus for reflecting changes in neuronal organization.

RESULTS

The MTs did not differ between the affected (AH) and unaffected hemisphere (UH) in 50μV responses, while the MTs for 2mV responses were higher (p=0.018) in AH. SICI was weakened in AH (p=0.008). ADCs were higher in the affected M1 compared to the unaffected M1 (p=0.018) while there were no inter-hemispheric differences in SMA or thalamus.

CONCLUSIONS

Inter-hemispheric asymmetry and neuronal organization demonstrated abnormalities in the M1. However, no confident inference can be made whether the observed alterations in neurophysiological and imaging measures have causal role for motor rehabilitation in these patients.

SIGNIFICANCE

Neurophysiological changes persist and are detectable using TMS years after stroke even though clinical symptoms have normalized.