Interferon-beta antibodies have a higher affinity in patients with neutralizing antibodies compared to patients with non-neutralizing antibodies

Antidrug Antibodies Against Biological Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis

The development of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) is a major problem in several recombinant protein therapies used in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). The etiology of ADAs is multifaceted. The predisposition for a breakdown of immune tolerance is probably genetically determined, and many factors may contribute to the immunogenicity, including structural properties, formation of aggregates, and presence of contaminants and impurities from the industrial manufacturing process. ADAs may have a neutralizing capacity and can reduce or abrogate the bioactivity and therapeutic efficacy of the drug and cause safety issues. Interferon (IFN)-β was the first drug approved for the treatment of MS, and-although it is generally recognized that neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) appear and potentially have a negative effect on therapeutic efficacy-the use of routine measurements of NAbs and the interpretation of the presence of NAbs has been debated at length. NAbs appear after 9-18 months of therapy in up to 40% of patients treated with IFNβ, and the frequency and titers of NAbs depend on the IFNβ preparation. Although all pivotal clinical trials of approved IFNβ products in MS exhibited a detrimental effect of NAbs after prolonged therapy, some subsequent studies did not observe clinical effects from NAbs, which led to the claim that NAbs did not matter. However, it is now largely agreed that persistently high titers of NAbs indicate an abrogation of the biological response and, hence, an absence of therapeutic efficacy, and this observation should lead to a change of therapy. Low and medium titers are ambiguous, and treatment decisions should be guided by determination of in vivo messenger RNA myxovirus resistance protein A induction after IFNβ administration and clinical disease activity. During treatment with glatiramer acetate, ADAs occur frequently but do not appear to adversely affect treatment efficacy or result in adverse events. ADAs occur in approximately 5% of patients treated with natalizumab within 6 months of therapy, and persistent NAbs are associated with a lack of efficacy and acute infusion-related reactions and should instigate a change of therapy. When using the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies ocrelizumab and ofatumumab in the treatment of MS, it is not necessary to test for NAbs as these occur very infrequently. Alemtuzumab is immunogenic, but routine measurements of ADAs are not recommended as the antibodies in the pivotal 2-year trials at the population level did not influence lymphocyte depletion or repopulation, efficacy, or safety. However, in some individuals, NAbs led to poor lymphocyte depletion.

Persistency of Neutralizing Anti-Interferon-β Antibodies in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Treated with Subcutaneous Interferon-β Depends on Antibody Titers, IgG Subclasses, and Affinity Maturation

Neutralizing antibodies may affect interferon (IFN)-β treatment efficacy, but mechanisms of neutralizing anti-drug antibody (ADA) evolution are not fully elucidated. We investigated the relationship between ADA titers, IgG subclass profile, and binding affinity with the development and persistency of neutralizing ADA in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) patients treated with subcutaneous IFN-β. A total of 94 patients, who had blood sampling at months 6, 12, 24, and 36 during IFN-β therapy, were included into this retrospective study and stratified to the following: non-neutralizing, transient, and persistent neutralizing ADA status. Patients without or with transient neutralizing ADA displayed predominantly IgG₁ and IgG₃ subclasses, lower ADA titers, and antibody binding affinity compared with patients having persistent neutralizing ADA, in whom the predominant IgG subclasses were IgG₂ and IgG₄. Overall, ADA binding affinity positively correlated with IgG₄ and neutralizing ADA titers, but negatively with IgG₃ titers. Persistency of neutralizing ADA was predicted by their titers at month 24 and month 36 of treatment and by an increase of antibody affinity within the second year of IFN-β treatment. The humoral immune response to IFN-β observed in MS patients as a result of IFN-β therapy is a multifactorial process that is influenced by ADA titers, affinity maturation, and IgG subclass switching.

Standardizing terms, definitions and concepts for describing and interpreting unwanted immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals: recommendations of the Innovative Medicines Initiative ABIRISK consortium

Biopharmaceuticals (BPs) represent a rapidly growing class of approved and investigational drug therapies that is contributing significantly to advancing treatment in multiple disease areas, including inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, genetic deficiencies and cancer. Unfortunately, unwanted immunogenic responses to BPs, in particular those affecting clinical safety or efficacy, remain among the most common negative effects associated with this important class of drugs. To manage and reduce risk of unwanted immunogenicity, diverse communities of clinicians, pharmaceutical industry and academic scientists are involved in: interpretation and management of clinical and biological outcomes of BP immunogenicity, improvement of methods for describing, predicting and mitigating immunogenicity risk and elucidation of underlying causes. Collaboration and alignment of efforts across these communities is made difficult due to lack of agreement on concepts, practices and standardized terms and definitions related to immunogenicity. The Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI; http://www.imi-europe.org), ABIRISK consortium [Anti-Biopharmaceutical (BP) Immunization Prediction and Clinical Relevance to Reduce the Risk; http://www.abirisk.eu] was formed by leading clinicians, academic scientists and EFPIA (European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations) members to elucidate underlying causes, improve methods for immunogenicity prediction and mitigation and establish common definitions around terms and concepts related to immunogenicity. These efforts are expected to facilitate broader collaborations and lead to new guidelines for managing immunogenicity. To support alignment, an overview of concepts behind the set of key terms and definitions adopted to date by ABIRISK is provided herein along with a link to access and download the ABIRISK terms and definitions and provide comments (http://www.abirisk.eu/index_t_and_d.asp).

Interferon-Beta: Neutralizing Antibodies, Binding Antibodies, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, and Clinical Outcomes

Antibodies to interferon-beta (IFNb) may occur during treatment with this drug and can be measured at several levels, the totality of antibodies referred to as antidrug antibodies (ADA) or binding antibodies, and in case of interference with the drug activity referred to as neutralizing antibodies (NAB). Antibodies can also interfere with the biological activity of IFNb as measured by pharmacodynamic markers. To get a complete picture of the interference between IFNb as a drug and the ADA, all the 3 above levels need to be considered. Furthermore, the interaction of these biomarkers changes over time with a shift of antibody properties with respect to immunoglobulin subtypes, affinity, and titers of antibodies. In case of persistent NAB, the clinical benefit of IFNb in the treatment of multiple sclerosis is abolished. In this report, the current knowledge on these issues will be reviewed. The data have been presented at a meeting in Coral Gables, Florida on April 18-21, 2012.

Early detection of neutralizing antibodies to interferon-beta in multiple sclerosis patients: binding antibodies predict neutralizing antibody development

BACKGROUND

Neutralizing antibodies (NAb) affect efficacy of interferon-beta (IFN-b) treatment in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. NAbs evolve in up to 44% of treated patients, usually between 6-18 months on therapy.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether early binding antibody (BAb) titers or different IFN-b biomarkers predict NAb evolution.

METHODS

We included patients with MS or clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) receiving de novo IFN-b treatment in this prospective European multicenter study. Blood samples were collected at baseline, before and after the first IFN-b administration, and again after 3, 12 and 24 months on that therapy; for determination of NAbs, BAbs, gene expression of MxA and protein concentrations of MMP-9, TIMP-1, sTRAIL, CXCL-10 and CCL-2.

RESULTS

We found that 22 of 164 (13.4%) patients developed NAbs during a median time of 23.8 months on IFN-b treatment. Of these patients, 78.9% were BAb-positive after 3 months. BAb titers ≥ 1:2400 predicted NAb evolution with a sensitivity of 74.7% and a specificity of 98.5%. Cross-sectionally, MxA levels were significantly diminished in the BAb/NAb-positive samples; similarly, CXCL-10 and sTRAIL concentrations in BAb/NAb-positive and BAb-positive/NAb-negative samples, respectively, were also diminished compared to BAb/NAb-negative samples.

CONCLUSIONS

BAb titers reliably predict NAbs. CXCL-10 is a promising sensitive biomarker for IFN-b response and its abrogation by anti-IFN-b antibodies.

Neutralizing antibodies against interferon-Beta

The development of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) is a major problem in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients treated with interferon-beta (IFN-ß). Whereas binding antibodies (BAbs) can be demonstrated in the vast majority of patients, only a smaller proportion of patients develop NAbs. The principle in NAb in vitro assays is the utilization of cultured cell lines that are responsive to IFN-ß. The cytopathic effect (CPE) assay measures the capacity of NAbs to neutralize IFN- ß's protective effect on cells challenged with virus and the MxA induction assay measures the ability of NAbs to reduce the IFN-ß-induced expression of MxA, either at the mRNA or the protein level. A titer of >20 neutralizing units/ml traditionally defines NAb posi-tivity. NAbs in high titers completely abrogate the in vivo response to IFN-ß, whereas the effect of low and intermediate titers is unpredictable. As clinically important NAbs appear only after 9-18 months IFN- ß0 therapy, short-term studies of two years or less are unsuitable for evaluation of clinical NAb effects. All long-term trials of three years or more concordantly show evidence of a detrimental effect of NAbs on relapses, disease activity on MRI, or on disease progression. Persistent high titers of NAbs indicate an abrogation of the biological response and, hence, absence of therapeutic efficacy, and this observation should lead to a change of therapy. As low and medium titers are ambiguous treatment decisions in patients with low NAb titres should be guided by determination of in vivo mRNA MxA induction and clinical disease activity.

Persistency of neutralizing antibodies depends on titer and interferon-beta preparation

Background: Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) affect the efficacy of interferon-beta (IFNβ) treatment in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, particularly if NAbs persist. Persistency depends on NAb titers, which differ between IFNβ preparations.

Objective: This study evaluated IFNβ preparation-specific NAb cut-off titers during early treatment for prediction of NAb persistency.

Methods: Patients who had at least one NAb test between 12 and 30 months (baseline) as well as after more than 48 months (follow-up) on IFNβ treatment were included in this longitudinal study.

Results: At baseline 1064 patients had a NAb test. Of those, 203 had a follow-up test. In the follow-up group 23.2% of patients were NAb positive during baseline. NAb frequency significantly decreased by 40.7% in the IFNβ-1a and by 60% in the IFNβ-1b group at follow-up after a mean time of 75.4 months on treatment, and median NAb titers decreased significantly in both groups. During baseline, NAb titers of >258 neutralizing units (NU) had a sensitivity of 81.3% and a specificity of 90.9% in the IFNβ-1a group, whereas titers of >460 NU had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 91.7% in the IFNβ-1b group to predict persistency at follow-up. When these cut-off titers are applied, 10.2% of all treated patients developed persistent NAbs.

Conclusion: IFNβ preparation-specific NAb cut-off titers for prediction of NAb persistency, which may be useful in individual treatment decision making, are provided.

Neutralizing antibodies to interferon-beta and other immunological treatments for multiple sclerosis: prevalence and impact on outcomes

Biopharmaceuticals can induce antibodies, which interact with and neutralize the therapeutic effect of such drugs and are therefore termed neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). In the treatment of multiple sclerosis, NAbs against interferon (IFN)-beta and natalizumab have been recognized. The prevalence of NAbs against different IFNbeta preparations varies widely, mainly depending on the product but also on other factors such as amino acid sequence variations, glycosylation, formulation, route and frequency of application, dose, duration of treatment and patient characteristics (human leukocyte antigen [HLA] status). IFNbeta-1a given intramuscularly induces significantly less NAbs than any other IFNbeta formulation. The longitudinal development of NAbs also differs between IFNbeta preparations, with higher reversion rates in IFNbeta-1b-treated compared with IFNbeta-1a-treated patients. The negative effect of NAbs on various outcome measures is very consistent across many studies, specifically when observation periods are longer than 2 years. NAbs against natalizumab occur less frequently (6%) and, like NAbs against IFNbeta, they are associated with a loss of clinical and radiological efficacy of the drug.

Comparative study of four different assays for the detection of binding antibodies against interferon-beta

BACKGROUND

Binding antibodies (BAB) against interferon-beta (IFNbeta) are often determined as screening assays before performing an expensive and elaborate neutralizing antibody (NAB) test.

METHODS

In this study, we compared four BAB tests, a western blot (WB), a direct binding enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (dELISA), a capture ELISA (cELISA), and a commercial enzyme immuno-assay (EIA) in 325 multiple sclerosis patients with and without neutralizing antibodies to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity to detect NAB by receiver operating characteristics analysis.

RESULTS

The area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.907 for the dELISA, 0.925 for the cELISA, and 0.776 for the EIA (P < 0.0001 for all). At a sensitivity of 95%, the specificity was approximately 30% in the dELISA, 55% in the cELISA, and 13% in the EIA. The WB as a qualitative BAB detection method had a given sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 55%. There was a strong and significant correlation between high NAB titers (>500 neutralizing units [NU]) and titers obtained by all quantitative BAB assays. However, low to medium NAB titers (20-500 NU) did not significantly correlate with BAB titers.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the cELISA seems to be most suitable for NAB screening, but BAB titers cannot reliably predict NAB titers.

Identification of interferon-beta antibodies in a reference laboratory setting: Findings for 1144 consecutive sera

Clinical studies demonstrate differences in interferon-beta (IFNbeta) antibody detection frequencies among multiple sclerosis patients receiving different IFNbeta products. We sought to determine if these differences are also found when IFNbeta antibodies are measured in a reference laboratory, where factors normally controlled in clinical studies are unknown. Serum IFNbeta binding antibodies (BAbs) were quantitated by ELISA; BAbs-positive samples were then tested in a bioassay for neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). Consistent with clinical studies, frequencies of BAbs-positive sera and NAbs-positive sera were lower in the Avonex (IFNbeta-1a) treatment group than Rebif (IFNbeta-1a) and Betaseron (IFNbeta-1b) groups. We further identified a predictive relationship between positive BAbs levels and NAbs activity in patients treated with IFNbeta-1a products, but not those treated with IFNbeta-1b.

Using measurements of neutralizing antibodies: the challenge of IFN-? therapy

Although the occurrence of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) to interferon (IFN)-beta has been acknowledged since the pivotal trials of IFN-beta in multiple sclerosis (MS), the effect of these antibodies has for several reasons been debated. The main reason for the controversies has been insufficient knowledge of the fact that clinically relevant NAbs do not appear until 12-18 months after initiation of IFN-beta therapy which make studies of 2 years or less unsuited to assess the clinical relevance of NAbs. Further, changes in NAb affinity occur and contribute to increase NAb effects by time. The present paper reviews our current knowledge of NAbs and stresses the importance of using measurements of NAbs routinely. It is concluded that NAb titres are important for the biological response to IFN-beta. Patients with low or intermediate titres may have preserved a full or partial biological response and might still benefit from IFN-beta therapy. However, persistent high titres of NAbs indicate an abrogation of the biological response and, hence, absence of therapeutic efficacy, and this observation should lead to a change of therapy. The application of the existing information about NAbs in clinical practice would lead to improved efficacy of IFN-beta treatment for the benefit of patients with MS.

Pharmacodynamics of interferon beta in multiple sclerosis patients with or without serum neutralizing antibodies

To analyze the in vivo biological effect of anti-interferon beta (IFN-beta) neutralizing antibodies (NABs), blood concentrations of neopterin, beta2microglobulin (Beta2-MG), mRNA-dependent myxovirusresistant protein A (MxA) and dsRNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR) were measured before (predose) and 24 hours after (postdose) IFN-beta administration in 49 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) with (n = 25) and without (n = 24) NABs. The results indicated that predose levels of MxA-mRNA and PKR-mRNA were highly variable [coefficient of variation (CV) > 100%] among patients. A lower inter-individual variability was observed for pre-dose levels of Beta2-MG and neopterin (CVs of 29% and 44%, respectively). Significantly lower pre- and post-dose blood levels of IFN induced markers, except for postdose PKR-mRNA (p = 0.09), were seen in NAB+ compared with NAB-patients and between patients with high (> 200 t(1/10)) and low ( pound 200 t(1/10)) NAB titers. A significant inverse correlation between NAB titer and pre-dose levels of the above IFN-induced markers was found. In summary, our findings confirm that NABs affect absolute concentrations of IFN-beta induced markers and suggest that such an effect occurs in a titer-dependent manner.

Are ex vivo neutralising antibodies against IFN-beta always detrimental to therapeutic efficacy in multiple sclerosis?

Neutralising antibodies (NAbs) against interferon (IFN)-beta reduce the treatment effect in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, data from pivotal trials of IFN-beta in MS suggest that NAb-positive patients may have a reduced relapse rate during the first six to 12 months of therapy. We collected clinical data and plasma samples for NAb measurements prospectively, every six months, in 468 patients treated with the same IFN-beta preparation for at least 24 months. NAbs were measured blindly with a cytopathic effect (CPE) assay. During treatment months 0-6, patients who became NAb-positive had significantly fewer relapses compared to patients who maintained the NAb-negative status, whereas the opposite was observed after month 6. This is in accordance with observations in randomised studies of the three different IFN-beta preparations, showing that patients who become NAb-positive have lower relapse rates during the first six or 12 months of therapy. We hypothesise that low affinity NAbs, present early after the start of IFN-beta therapy, though neutralising in vitro in sensitive assays increase the half-life of IFN-beta in vivo and, thereby, enhance the therapeutic effect. With affinity maturation, NAbs effectively prevent IFN-beta binding to its receptors also in vivo and, hence, abolish the treatment effect.

Neutralizing antibodies to interferon beta in multiple sclerosis: Analytical evaluation for validation of a cytopathic effect assay

BACKGROUND

Recent guidelines have recommended the use of validated assays for the measurement of neutralizing antibodies (NABs) to interferon beta (IFNbeta) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). In an attempt of validation, we studied the analytical performance of a bioassay based on antiviral cytopathic effect (CPE) using WISH cells and the vesicular stomatitis virus (WISH/VSV CPE).

METHODS

NAB titres measured with the WISH/VSV CPE assay in 63 sera from IFNbeta-treated MS patients were compared to those obtained with the reference CPE method using A549 cells and the encephalomyocarditis virus. Binding antibodies (BABs) were measured using a capture ELISA as a screening test for NABs.

RESULTS

No false-negative BAB was obtained in our patients. The between-run coefficients of variation (CVs) determined with log10 titres of the NIH anti-IFNbeta (G038-501-572) yielded good results (<or=10.4%) and within-run variability was excellent (CV<or=2%). The log10 titres obtained with both CPE assays were highly correlated (r=0.969 and r=0.884 for anti-IFNbeta-1a and anti-IFNbeta-1b, respectively). The same patients were found NAB-positive with both CPE assays.

CONCLUSION

Because of its good precision, sensitivity and excellent correlation with the reference CPE method, the WISH/VSV CPE bioassay can be used in the follow-up of IFNbeta-treated MS patients.