Identification of interferon-beta antibodies in a reference laboratory setting: Findings for 1144 consecutive sera

Antidrug Antibodies Against Biological Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis

The development of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) is a major problem in several recombinant protein therapies used in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). The etiology of ADAs is multifaceted. The predisposition for a breakdown of immune tolerance is probably genetically determined, and many factors may contribute to the immunogenicity, including structural properties, formation of aggregates, and presence of contaminants and impurities from the industrial manufacturing process. ADAs may have a neutralizing capacity and can reduce or abrogate the bioactivity and therapeutic efficacy of the drug and cause safety issues. Interferon (IFN)-β was the first drug approved for the treatment of MS, and-although it is generally recognized that neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) appear and potentially have a negative effect on therapeutic efficacy-the use of routine measurements of NAbs and the interpretation of the presence of NAbs has been debated at length. NAbs appear after 9-18 months of therapy in up to 40% of patients treated with IFNβ, and the frequency and titers of NAbs depend on the IFNβ preparation. Although all pivotal clinical trials of approved IFNβ products in MS exhibited a detrimental effect of NAbs after prolonged therapy, some subsequent studies did not observe clinical effects from NAbs, which led to the claim that NAbs did not matter. However, it is now largely agreed that persistently high titers of NAbs indicate an abrogation of the biological response and, hence, an absence of therapeutic efficacy, and this observation should lead to a change of therapy. Low and medium titers are ambiguous, and treatment decisions should be guided by determination of in vivo messenger RNA myxovirus resistance protein A induction after IFNβ administration and clinical disease activity. During treatment with glatiramer acetate, ADAs occur frequently but do not appear to adversely affect treatment efficacy or result in adverse events. ADAs occur in approximately 5% of patients treated with natalizumab within 6 months of therapy, and persistent NAbs are associated with a lack of efficacy and acute infusion-related reactions and should instigate a change of therapy. When using the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies ocrelizumab and ofatumumab in the treatment of MS, it is not necessary to test for NAbs as these occur very infrequently. Alemtuzumab is immunogenic, but routine measurements of ADAs are not recommended as the antibodies in the pivotal 2-year trials at the population level did not influence lymphocyte depletion or repopulation, efficacy, or safety. However, in some individuals, NAbs led to poor lymphocyte depletion.

The cross-reactivity of binding antibodies with different interferon beta formulations used as disease-modifying drugs in multiple sclerosis patients

Interferon beta (IFNb) preparations are commonly used as first-line therapy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). They are, however, characterized by limited efficacy, partly due to the formation of anti-IFNb antibodies in patients.In this pilot study, we assessed with the ELISA method the presence of the binding antibodies (BAbs) against interferon beta after 2 years of therapy with subcutaneous interferon beta 1a (Rebif) in 49 RRMS patients. Antibody levels were established again within 1 year after treatment withdrawal. We used 3 interferons that are commercially available for MS therapy, namely Avonex (Biogen Idec Limited), Rebif (Merck Serono), and Betaferon (Bayer Pharma AG), as antigens.BAbs reacting with Rebif were found in 24.4% to 55% of patients, depending on the units of their expression. The levels of anti-Rebif antibodies remained high in 8 patients and in 4 patients they dropped significantly. Strong correlations were obtained in all assays (anti-Rebif-anti-Avonex, anti-Rebif-anti-Betaferon, and anti-Betaferon-anti-Avonex) and the existence of cross-reactivity in the formation of antibodies against all the tested formulations of interferon beta was confirmed. The levels of BAbs remain significant in the clinical context, and their assessment is the first choice screening; however, methods of BAbs evaluation can be crucial for further decisions. More studies are needed to confirm our results; specifically it would be of interest to evaluate methods of neutralizing antibodies identification, as we only assessed the binding antibodies. Nevertheless, our results support the concept that in interferon nonresponders, that are positive for binding antibodies, switching the therapy to alternative disease-modifying agent (for example glatiramer acetate, fingolimod, or natalizumab) is justified, whereas the switch to another interferon formulation will probably be of no benefit.

Correlation between anti-interferon-β binding and neutralizing antibodies in interferon-β-treated multiple sclerosis patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Measurements of binding antibodies (BAbs), neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) and MX1 mRNA expression are used to analyse the immunological reactions in patients with MS treated with IFN-β. The correlations between these are yet not fully understood.

METHODS

We measured BAbs and NAbs to IFN-β in 110 serum samples from 83 patients with MS treated with IFN-β, and in a subgroup, antibody titre was compared with corresponding expressions of MX1 mRNA. The methods used were capture ELISA assay, luciferase reporter gene assay and mRNA RT-PCR for MX1 gene expression.

RESULTS

There were significant correlations between binding, neutralizing and MX1 results. Cut-off values are suggested for the definition of samples of BAbs and NAbs as negative, positive and grey zones. Naturally occurring groups of low and high antibody titres were identified by the correlation between BAbs and NAbs, probably as a result of an immunological maturation process of antibodies. The low-titre group had lower correlations between BAbs and NAbs than the high-titre group.

CONCLUSIONS

High correlation is demonstrated between the results obtained by the three methods, and we suggest the possibility of using ELISA measurements of BAbs to identify patients with high titres of anti-IFN-β antibodies that block the biological response to IFN-β. Ιn patients with low titres, we suggest to supplement ELISA with measurement of MX1 mRNA to establish whether the bioavailability of IFN-β is preserved.

Neutralizing antibodies against interferon-Beta

The development of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) is a major problem in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients treated with interferon-beta (IFN-ß). Whereas binding antibodies (BAbs) can be demonstrated in the vast majority of patients, only a smaller proportion of patients develop NAbs. The principle in NAb in vitro assays is the utilization of cultured cell lines that are responsive to IFN-ß. The cytopathic effect (CPE) assay measures the capacity of NAbs to neutralize IFN- ß's protective effect on cells challenged with virus and the MxA induction assay measures the ability of NAbs to reduce the IFN-ß-induced expression of MxA, either at the mRNA or the protein level. A titer of >20 neutralizing units/ml traditionally defines NAb posi-tivity. NAbs in high titers completely abrogate the in vivo response to IFN-ß, whereas the effect of low and intermediate titers is unpredictable. As clinically important NAbs appear only after 9-18 months IFN- ß0 therapy, short-term studies of two years or less are unsuitable for evaluation of clinical NAb effects. All long-term trials of three years or more concordantly show evidence of a detrimental effect of NAbs on relapses, disease activity on MRI, or on disease progression. Persistent high titers of NAbs indicate an abrogation of the biological response and, hence, absence of therapeutic efficacy, and this observation should lead to a change of therapy. As low and medium titers are ambiguous treatment decisions in patients with low NAb titres should be guided by determination of in vivo mRNA MxA induction and clinical disease activity.

Disease biomarkers in multiple sclerosis: potential for use in therapeutic decision making

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disorder of the brain and spinal cord that predominantly affects white matter. MS has a variable clinical presentation and has no 'diagnostic' laboratory test; this often results in delays to definite diagnosis. In confronting the disease, early diagnosis and appropriate, timely therapeutic intervention are critical factors in ensuring favorable long-term outcomes. The availability of reliable biomarkers could radically alter our management of MS at critical phases of the disease spectrum. Identification of markers that could predict the development of MS in high-risk populations would allow for intervention strategies that may prevent evolution to definite disease. Work with anti-myelin antibodies and the ongoing analysis of microarray gene expression have thus far not yielded biomarkers that predict future disease development. Similarly, extensive studies with serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) have not yielded a disease-specific and sensitive diagnostic biomarker for MS. Establishment of disease diagnosis always leads to questions about long-term prognosis because in an individual patient the natural history of the disease is clinically unpredictable. Biomarkers that correlate with myelin loss, spinal cord disease, grey matter and subcortical demyelination need to be developed in order to accurately predict the disease course. The bulk of effort in biomarker development in MS has been concentrated in the area of monitoring disease activity. At present, a disease 'activation' panel of CSF biomarkers would include the following: interleukin-6 or its soluble receptor, nitric oxide and nitric oxide synthase, osteopontin, and fetuin-A. Although disease activity in MS is predominantly inflammatory, disease progression is likely to be the result of neurodegeneration. Therefore, the roles of proteins indicative of neuronal, axonal, and glial loss such as neurofilaments, tau, 14-3-3 proteins, and N-acetylaspartate are all under investigation, as are proteins affecting remyelination and regeneration, such as Nogo-A. With the increasing awareness of cognition dysfunction in MS, molecules such as apolipoprotein and proteins in the amyloid precursor protein pathway implicated in dementia are also being examined. Serum biomarkers that help monitor therapeutic efficacy such as the titer of antibody to beta-interferon, a first-line medication in MS, are established in clinical practice. Ongoing work with biomarkers that reflect drug bioavailability and factors that distinguish between medication responders and nonresponders are also under investigation. The discovery of new biomarkers relies on applying advances in proteomics along with microarray gene and antigen analysis and will hopefully result in the establishment of specific biomarkers for MS.