Genetic basis of Guillain-Barre syndrome

Explore genetic susceptibility association between viral infections and Guillain-Barré syndrome risk using two-sample Mendelian randomization

BACKGROUND

Numerous observational studies have indicated that patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) frequently had infections with various pathogens before the onset of the disease, particularly several viral infections. Some of these infections are linked to specific clinical and immunological subgroups of GBS, suggesting a potential correlation between viral infections and the development of GBS. However, observational studies have several limitations, including the presence of confounding factors.

METHOD

We explored the potential correlation between HIV, SARS-CoV-2, varicella-zoster virus, herpes simplex virus, Epstein-Barr virus, hepatitis B virus, and influenza virus with GBS using a two-sample Mendelian randomization approach. The data was derived from published summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). After removing linkage disequilibrium, selecting strong instrumental variables and addressing confounding factors, we would conduct a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis along with sensitivity testing and the MR-Steiger directional test.

RESULT

HIV may have a causal association with GBS (IVW: p = 0.010, OR [95% CI] 1.240 [1.052-1.463]), while no such relationship exists with COVID-19 (IVW: p = 0.275, OR [95% CI] 0.831[0.596-1.159]), varicella (IVW: p = 0.543, OR [95% CI] 0.919 [0.701-1.206]), herpes zoster (IVW: p = 0.563, OR [95% CI] 0.941 [0.766-1.156]), HSV (IVW: p = 0.280, OR [95% CI] 1.244 [0.837-1.851]), EBV (IVW: p = 0.218, OR [95% CI] 0.883 [0.724-1.076]), HBV (IVW: p = 0.179, OR [95% CI] 1.072 [0.969-1.187]), or influenza virus (IVW: p = 0.917, OR [95% CI] 0.971 [0.553-1.703]). We did not find any abnormal SNPs, pleiotropy, or heterogeneity, nor is there any reverse causation.

CONCLUSION

Our study results indicate a causal relationship between HIV and GBS, providing new research directions for the etiology of GBS.

Evaluating Nanoparticulate Vaccine Formulations for Effective Antigen Presentation and T-Cell Proliferation Using an In Vitro Overlay Assay

Inducing T lymphocyte (T-cell) activation and proliferation with specificity against a pathogen is crucial in vaccine formulation. Assessing vaccine candidates' ability to induce T-cell proliferation helps optimize formulation for its safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy. Our in-house vaccine candidates use microparticles (MPs) and nanoparticles (NPs) to enhance antigen stability and target delivery to antigen-presenting cells (APCs), providing improved immunogenicity. Typically, vaccine formulations are screened for safety and immunostimulatory effects using in vitro methods, but extensive animal testing is often required to assess immunogenic responses. We identified the need for a rapid, intermediate screening process to select promising candidates before advancing to expensive and time-consuming in vivo evaluations. In this study, an in vitro overlay assay system was demonstrated as an effective high-throughput preclinical testing method to evaluate the immunogenic properties of early-stage vaccine formulations. The overlay assay's effectiveness in testing particulate vaccine candidates for immunogenic responses has been evaluated by optimizing the carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) T-cell proliferation assay. DCs were overlaid with T-cells, allowing vaccine-stimulated DCs to present antigens to CFSE-stained T-cells. T-cell proliferation was quantified using flow cytometry on days 0, 1, 2, 4, and 6 upon successful antigen presentation. The assay was tested with nanoparticulate vaccine formulations targeting Neisseria gonorrhoeae (CDC F62, FA19, FA1090), measles, H1N1 flu prototype, canine coronavirus, and Zika, with adjuvants including Alhydrogel® (Alum) and AddaVax™. The assay revealed robust T-cell proliferation in the vaccine treatment groups, with variations between bacterial and viral vaccine candidates. A dose-dependent study indicated immune stimulation varied with antigen dose. These findings highlight the assay's potential to differentiate and quantify effective antigen presentation, providing valuable insights for developing and optimizing vaccine formulations.

Incidence and management of the main serious adverse events reported after COVID-19 vaccination

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2n first appeared in Wuhan, China in 2019. Soon after, it was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The health crisis imposed by a new virus and its rapid spread worldwide prompted the fast development of vaccines. For the first time in human history, two vaccines based on recombinant genetic material technology were approved for human use. These mRNA vaccines were applied in massive immunization programs around the world, followed by other vaccines based on more traditional approaches. Even though all vaccines were tested in clinical trials prior to their general administration, serious adverse events, usually of very low incidence, were mostly identified after application of millions of doses. Establishing a direct correlation (the cause-effect paradigm) between vaccination and the appearance of adverse effects has proven challenging. This review focuses on the main adverse effects observed after vaccination, including anaphylaxis, myocarditis, vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and transverse myelitis reported in the context of COVID-19 vaccination. We highlight the symptoms, laboratory tests required for an adequate diagnosis, and briefly outline the recommended treatments for these adverse effects. The aim of this work is to increase awareness among healthcare personnel about the serious adverse events that may arise post-vaccination. Regardless of the ongoing discussion about the safety of COVID-19 vaccination, these adverse effects must be identified promptly and treated effectively to reduce the risk of complications.

Biological analysis of the potential pathogenic mechanisms of Infectious COVID-19 and Guillain-Barré syndrome

Background

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a medical condition characterized by the immune system of the body attacking the peripheral nerves, including those in the spinal nerve roots, peripheral nerves, and cranial nerves. It can cause limb weakness, abnormal sensations, and facial nerve paralysis. Some studies have reported clinical cases associated with the severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and GBS, but how COVID-19 affects GBS is unclear.

Methods

We utilized bioinformatics techniques to explore the potential genetic connection between COVID-19 and GBS. Differential expression of genes (DEGs) related to COVID-19 and GBS was collected from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. By taking the intersection, we obtained shared DEGs for COVID-19 and GBS. Subsequently, we utilized bioinformatics analysis tools to analyze common DEGs, conducting functional enrichment analysis and constructing Protein-protein interaction networks (PPI), Transcription factors (TF) -gene networks, and TF-miRNA networks. Finally, we validated our findings by constructing the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results

This study utilizes bioinformatics tools for the first time to investigate the close genetic relationship between COVID-19 and GBS. CAMP, LTF, DEFA1B, SAMD9, GBP1, DDX60, DEFA4, and OAS3 are identified as the most significant interacting genes between COVID-19 and GBS. In addition, the signaling pathway of NOD-like receptors is believed to be essential in the link between COVID-19 and GBS.

COVID-19 as a trigger of Guillain-Barré syndrome: A review of the molecular mechanism

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused a pandemic with serious complications. After coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), several post-acute COVID-19 syndromes (PACSs) and long-COVID sequels were reported. PACSs involve many organs, including the nervous, gustatory, and immune systems. One of the PACSs after SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination is Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). The incidence rate of GBS after SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination is low. However, the high prevalence of COVID-19 and severe complications of GBS, for example, autonomic dysfunction and respiratory failure, highlight the importance of post-COVID-19 GBS. It is while patients with simultaneous COVID-19 and GBS seem to have higher admission rates to the intensive care unit, and demyelination is more aggressive in post-COVID-19 GBS patients. SARS-CoV-2 can trigger GBS via several pathways like direct neurotropism and neurovirulence, microvascular dysfunction and oxidative stress, immune system disruption, molecular mimicry, and autoantibody production. Although there are few molecular studies on the molecular and cellular mechanisms of GBS occurrence after SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination, we aimed to discuss the possible pathomechanism of post-COVID-19 GBS by gathering the most recent molecular evidence.

Guillain-Barré syndrome and COVID-19 vaccines: focus on adenoviral vectors

COVID-19 vaccination is a life-saving intervention. However, it does not come up without a risk of rare adverse events, which frequency varies between vaccines developed using different technological platforms. The increased risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) has been reported for selected adenoviral vector vaccines but not for other vaccine types, including more widely used mRNA preparations. Therefore, it is unlikely that GBS results from the cross-reactivity of antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein generated after the COVID-19 vaccination. This paper outlines two hypotheses according to which increased risk of GBS following adenoviral vaccination is due to (1) generation of anti-vector antibodies that may cross-react with proteins involved in biological processes related to myelin and axons, or (2) neuroinvasion of selected adenovirus vectors to the peripheral nervous system, infection of neurons and subsequent inflammation and neuropathies. The rationale behind these hypotheses is outlined, advocating further epidemiological and experimental research to verify them. This is particularly important given the ongoing interest in using adenoviruses in developing vaccines against various infectious diseases and cancer immunotherapeutics.

Case Series of Acute Peripheral Neuropathies in Individuals Who Received COVID-19 Vaccination

Background and Objectives: Vaccination has been critical to managing the COVID-19 pandemic. Autoimmunity of the nervous system, especially among a select set of high-risk groups, can be triggered or enhanced by the contents of vaccines. Here, we report a case series of acute peripheral neuropathies following vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We report on 11 patients (range: 30–90 years old) who presented at our center between January 2021 and February 2022. Methods: We obtained the patients’ history and performed clinical neurological examination and electromyoneurography on all subjects. If necessary, magnetic resonance imaging and laboratory testing, including cerebrospinal fluid analysis and specific antibody testing, were performed. Results: Patients presented with peripheral neuropathies of acute onset between 1 and 40 days after vaccination with different types of COVID-19 vaccines. Most cases (9/11) resolved with a rapid, complete or partial recovery. Conclusions: We found acute peripheral neuropathies in a set of individuals after they received vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Albeit our observation shows that during extensive vaccination programs, negative side effects on the peripheral nervous system might occur, most of them showed benign clinical evolution. Thus, potential side effects should not hinder the prescription of vaccines. More extensive studies are needed to elucidate populations at risk of developing peripheral neuropathies and mechanisms of autoimmune response in the nervous system.

[Pathophysiological and diagnostic aspects of Guillain-Barré syndrome]

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is the most common cause of acute neuropathy. It usually onset with a rapidly progressive ascending bilateral weakness with sensory disturbances, and patients may require intensive treatment and close monitoring as about 30% have a respiratory muscle weakness and about 10% have autonomic dysfunction. The diagnosis of GBS is based on clinical history and examination. Complementary examinations are performed to rule out a differential diagnosis and to secondarily confirm the diagnosis. GBS is usually preceded by an infectious event in ≈ 2/3 of cases. Infection leads to an immune response directed against carbohydrate antigens located on the infectious agent and the formation of anti-ganglioside antibodies. By molecular mimicry, these antibodies can target structurally similar carbohydrates found on host's nerves. Their binding results in nerve conduction failure or/and demyelination which can lead to axonal loss. Some anti-ganglioside antibodies are associated with particular variants of GBS: the Miller-Fisher syndrome, facial diplegia and paresthesias, the pharyngo-cervico-brachial variant, the paraparetic variant, and the Bickerstaff brainstem encephalitis. Their semiological differences might be explained by a distinct expression of gangliosides among nerves. The aim of this review is to present pathophysiological aspects and the diagnostic approach of GBS and its variants.

Case Report: Guillain-Barré Syndrome as Primary Presentation of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE-GBS) in a Teenage Girl

Peripheral nervous system involvement accounts for fewer than 10% of SLE cases with neuropsychiatric manifestations. Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) as the presenting, major manifestation of pediatric SLE is extremely rare, and the best treatment approach is unknown. A 14-year-old, previously healthy female teenager developed classic features of GBS with ascending bilateral muscle weakness leading to respiratory insufficiency, associated with protein-cell dissociation in cerebro-spinal fluid, nerve root enhancement by MRI and reduction in compound muscle action potential amplitude. SLE was diagnosed serologically and histologically (lupus nephritis WHO class II). Despite immediate treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), methylprednisolone pulses and subsequently, rituximab, the patient required prolonged mechanical ventilation. She achieved full recovery following 14 PLEX treatments and two more rituximab infusions. Anti-dsDNA, C3, C4 and urinalysis normalized while anti-Smith and Sjögren antibodies persisted 15 months after disease onset, with no other lupus manifestations. Review of the literature revealed two pediatric cases of GBS at the onset of SLE and a third case with GBS 6 years after the diagnosis of SLE. Conventional GBS therapy may not be adequate to treat SLE-GBS. SLE should be included in the differential diagnosis of GBS. Importantly, treatment experiences and outcomes of such cases need be reported to inform future treatment recommendations.