Frequency, location and risk factors of neonatal skin injuries from mechanical forces of pressure, friction, shear and stripping: A systematic literature review

Customized Silicone Foam Dressing Under Noninvasive Ventilation and Skincare Bundle to Reduce Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries in Neonates

In a sixty-eight-bed level-IV NICU, an increased incidence of hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) from noninvasive ventilation (NIV) devices was identified. The aim of this quality improvement project was to decrease HAPIs from NIV by 10%. A literature review and the Plan-Do-Study-Act were implemented. The intervention included a customized silicone foam dressing under NIV, an NIV skincare bundle, and multidisciplinary support. Hospital-acquired pressure injury rates were tracked over 3 years postinterventions. The incidence of HAPIs declined by 20% from 0.2 per 1,000 patient days to 0.05 per 1,000 patient days. Relative risk was 4.6 times greater prior to intervention (p = .04). Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) failure was not noted and measured by the percentage of patients on ventilators pre- and postintervention. Customized silicone foam dressings under NIV, NIV skincare bundle, and multidisciplinary team support may decrease HAPIs in neonates without CPAP failure.

The Effects of a New Wireless Non-Adhesive Cardiorespiratory Monitoring Device on the Skin Conditions of Preterm Infants

AIM

The aim of our study was to investigate skin conditions when wearing and removing a novel wireless non-adhesive cardiorespiratory monitoring device for neonates (Bambi-Belt) compared to standard adhesive electrodes.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective study including preterm neonates requiring cardiorespiratory monitoring. Besides standard electrodes, the infants wore a Bambi Belt for 10 consecutive days. Their skin conditions were assessed using Trans Epidermal Water Loss (TEWL) and the Neonatal Skin Condition Score (NSCS) after daily belt and standard electrode removal. The ∆TEWL was calculated as the difference between the TEWL at the device's location (Bambi-Belt/standard electrode) and the adjacent control skin location, with a higher ∆TEWL indicating skin damage.

RESULTS

A total of 15 infants (gestational age (GA): 24.1-35.6 wk) were analyzed. The ΔTEWL significantly increased directly after electrode removal (10.95 ± 9.98 g/m2/h) compared to belt removal (5.18 ± 6.71 g/m2/h; F: 8.73, p = 0.004) and after the washout period (3.72 ± 5.46 g/m2/h vs. 1.86 ± 3.35 g/m2/h; F: 2.84, p = 0.09), although the latter did not reach statistical significance. The TEWL was not influenced by prolonged belt wearing. No significant differences in the NSCS score were found between the belt and electrode (OR: 0.69, 95% CI [0.17, 2.88], p = 0.6).

CONCLUSION

A new wireless non-adhesive device for neonatal cardiorespiratory monitoring was well tolerated in preterm infants and may be less damaging during prolonged wearing.

A scoping review and narrative synthesis of neonatal skin injury severity scales

BACKGROUND

Mechanical force skin injuries are common for critical care patients, especially neonates. Currently, identification and severity assessments of injuries are dependent on clinical experience and/or utilization of severity tools. Compared with adults, neonates sustain skin injuries in different anatomical locations and have decreased layers of healthy tissue (from 0.9 to 1.2 mm) creating questions around direct application of adult injury severity scales reliant on visual assessment.

AIMS

The aim of this scoping review (ScR) was to investigate severity scales used to report hospital acquired skin injuries for neonates.

METHODS

This study utilized the 2015 Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews extension. PubMed, CINAHL, COCHRANE Central, Scopus, and the reference lists of included studies were searched for studies published between 2001 and 2023, that included severity scales use within neonatal population. Two authors independently identified studies for full review, data extraction, and quality assessment.

RESULTS

A systematic database search returned 1163 records. After full test review of 109 studies, 35 studies were included. A majority of studies included were cohort or action research and conducted in the United States of America. Most studies (57%, n = 20) reported skin injuries acquired throughout the body, 14 (40%) of the studies reported the nasal area alone and one study reported no anatomical location. A total of nine severity scales or combination of scales were utilized within studies (n = 31) and four studies did not report a scale. Various versions of scales from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (n = 16), European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (n = 8) or Neonatal Skin Condition Score (n = 4) were reported, compared with locally developed classifications/scales (n = 4). Scales were predominantly of ordinal grouping (74%, n = 26) or categorical assessment (14%, n = 5). Only one scale from 2004 was validated for neonates.

CONCLUSION

Neonatal skin injuries will continue to be reported subjectively until severity scales are consistently applied or other measurements are identified to support assessment. Additionally, without skin injury assessment uniformity, critical examination of effectiveness of skin care treatment practices will have subjective comparison. This review suggests there is a need for consistent skin assessment and severity scales that are valid for the neonatal population and their unique skin considerations.

Validity and reliability of the italian-Neonatal skin risk assessment scale (i-NSRAS)

BACKGROUND

The skin of infants has important anatomical and physiological differences from that of children and adults. Because of skin immaturity, reduced mobility, neurological changes, and the need for medical devices, infants are at high risk for pressure injuries. Specific, validated tools are needed to assess the risk of pressure injuries in this population.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the psychometric properties of the Italian version of Neonatal Skin Risk Assessment Scale (construct validity, internal consistency and reliability).

METHOD

A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in the neonatal units of the two Italian hospitals. 200 infants were examined 3 times by 54 nurses to assess the risk of pressure injuries. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were performed jointly to assess construct validity. Internal consistency was analyzed using McDonalds omega coefficient and Cronbach's alpha, while intra and interobserver agreement using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC).

RESULTS

Exploratory factor analysis confirmed a 2-factor model; the factor "duration and intensity of pressure" explained four subscales (mental state, mobility, activity and nutrition), while "skin immaturity" explained the subscales (general physical condition and skin moisture). Confirmatory factor analysis results indicated good model fits (X2/df = 0.84, p = 0.002, RMSEA = 0, NNFI = 1.01, NFI = 0.98 y CFI = 1 (M1 with MI). The italian-Neonatal Skin Risk Assessment Scale showed a good internal consistency, McDonalds omega coefficient and Cronbach's alpha both 0.86. An excellent intra and inter observer reliability was also observed, ICC 0.99 and 0.98 respectively.

CONCLUSION

The psychometric characteristics indicate that the italian-Neonatal Skin Risk Assessment Scale is useful, valid and reliable for measuring risk of pressure injuries in the neonatal population.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

This is the first valid and reliable newborn-specific scale that assesses the presence of medical devices. Its use could enable efficient management of preventive resources, early classification of newborns at risk and assignment of preventive interventions, facilitate the development of risk assessment protocols.

Patients' experiences with the application of medical adhesives to the skin: a qualitative systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION

Medical adhesives are adhesives used in medical devices to establish and maintain contact with the body over a period of time (usually by application to the skin) and are widely used in most care settings. Application of medical adhesives to the skin can lead to skin stripping, mild or severe allergic reactions and skin irritation that may manifest as redness, itching or rash. Adhesive-related skin injury can lead to infection, delayed wound healing and an increased risk of scarring. These injuries can cause severe discomfort and pain, and can affect the patient's quality of life. A systematic review summarising patient's experiences on this topic will contribute to informing adhesive producers and policy makers, and guiding further development and improvement of available technologies.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This systematic review protocol is based on the principles of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guideline. A systematic search will be conducted in CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO. In addition, manual searches will be performed, reviewing the reference lists of relevant reviews and articles included for quality assessment. Qualitative studies using various methods will be considered for inclusion. Screening of title, abstract and full text will be done by two reviewers. The methodological quality of studies under consideration will be critically assessed by two reviewers using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool for Qualitative Research. Data extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers using a predefined data extraction form. Meta-aggregation will be used to summarise the evidence.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No ethical approval or consent is required because no participants will be recruited. This systematic review protocol is published in an open access journal to increase transparency of the research methods used. Results will be disseminated at national and international conferences.

Hospital-acquired skin lesions in the neonatal intensive care unit: A retrospective analysis of temporal trends and quality improvement strategies

PURPOSE

Skin lesions in neonatal population are an emerging problem deserving attention from health care professionals. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively assess the incidence of hospital-acquired skin lesions during a 6-year period and to describe the characteristics of infants who developed them.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study conducted in a university-tertiary care center between 2015 and 2020. A descriptive analysis of the observed skin lesions is presented according to 2 time periods: 1) the implementation phase of a quality improvement program (2015-2019) and 2) the postimplementation phase (2020).

RESULTS

Our findings showed an apparent increase in the incidence of all reported skin lesions throughout the study period. Pressure injuries were the most frequently reported skin lesions showing an increasing incidence over time which, however, was paralleled by a reduction in their severity. Among pressure injuries, device-related injuries were the most commonly observed (56.6% and 62.5% in the two periods, respectively) with nasal continuous positive airway pressure-related injuries accounting for 71.7% and 56.0% of lesions, respectively, and mainly affecting the nose root. The occipital area was the most frequently involved site in cases of conventional pressure injuries.

CONCLUSION

Infants admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Units may be at high risk of developing skin lesions. The adoption of appropriate preventative as well as treatment interventions could be effective in reducing the severity of pressure injuries.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The implementation of quality improvement strategies may contribute to prevent skin injuries or lead to their early detection.

Global variation in skin injures and skincare practices in extremely preterm infants

BACKGROUND

Globally, are skincare practices and skin injuries in extremely preterm infants comparable? This study describes skin injuries, variation in skincare practices and investigates any association between them.

METHODS

A web-based survey was conducted between February 2019 and August 2021. Quantifying skin injuries and describing skincare practices in extremely preterm infants were the main outcomes. The association between skin injuries and skincare practices was established using binary multivariable logistic regression adjusted for regions.

RESULTS

Responses from 848 neonatal intensive care units, representing all geographic regions and income status groups were received. Diaper dermatitis (331/840, 39%) and medical adhesive-related skin injuries (319/838, 38%) were the most common injuries. Following a local skincare guideline reduced skin injuries [medical adhesive-related injuries: adjusted odds ratios (aOR) = 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.45-0.88; perineal injuries: aOR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.45-0.96; local skin infections: OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.26-0.65; chemical burns: OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.26-0.83; thermal burns: OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.27-0.96]. Performing skin assessments at least every four hours reduced skin injuries (abrasion: aOR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.33-0.67; pressure: aOR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.34-0.78; diaper dermatitis: aOR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.51-0.99; perineal: aOR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.36-0.75). Regional and resource settings-based variations in skin injuries and skincare practices were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Skin injuries were common in extremely preterm infants. Consistency in practice and improved surveillance appears to reduce the occurrence of these injuries. Better evidence regarding optimal practices is needed to reduce skin injuries and minimize practice variations.

Alteration of skin condition in newborns admitted to neonatal intensive care: a concept analysis

OBJECTIVES

to analyze the concept of alteration of skin condition in newborns admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

METHODS

this is a concept analysis operationalized by scoping review. The search was conducted in three parts: the first, in sources like Scopus and Web of Science; the second, in Google Scholar®; and the third, through a parallel list of references.

RESULTS

according to the types of skin, the most frequent alterations were erythema/redness and pressure injuries. The concept analysis was more evident in the attribute "skin lesions or alterations" than the others. The most frequent antecedents were gestational age, birth weight, and factors related to hospitalization. Among the consequences stood out infection/sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

this study allows improving the vision of health professionals regarding alterations in skin condition of neonates and, therefore, may contribute to a safe and systematized nursing practice.

Skin-Integrated Devices with Soft, Holey Architectures for Wireless Physiological Monitoring, With Applications in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Continuous monitoring of vital signs is an essential aspect of operations in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units (NICUs and PICUs), of particular importance to extremely premature and/or critically ill patients. Current approaches require multiple sensors taped to the skin and connected via hard-wired interfaces to external data acquisition electronics. The adhesives can cause iatrogenic injuries to fragile, underdeveloped skin, and the wires can complicate even the most routine tasks in patient care. Here, materials strategies and design concepts are introduced that significantly improve these platforms through the use of optimized materials, open (i.e., "holey") layouts and precurved designs. These schemes 1) reduce the stresses at the skin interface, 2) facilitate release of interfacial moisture from transepidermal water loss, 3) allow visual inspection of the skin for rashes or other forms of irritation, 4) enable triggered reduction of adhesion to reduce the probability for injuries that can result from device removal. A combination of systematic benchtop testing and computational modeling identifies the essential mechanisms and key considerations. Demonstrations on adult volunteers and on a neonate in an operating NICUs illustrate a broad range of capabilities in continuous, clinical-grade monitoring of conventional vital signs, and unconventional indicators of health status.

An E-Textile Respiration Sensing System for NICU Monitoring: Design and Validation

The world is witnessing a rising number of preterm infants who are at significant risk of medical conditions. These infants require continuous care in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU). Medical parameters are continuously monitored in premature infants in the NICU using a set of wired, sticky electrodes attached to the body. Medical adhesives used on the electrodes can be harmful to the baby, causing skin injuries, discomfort, and irritation. In addition, respiration rate (RR) monitoring in the NICU faces challenges of accuracy and clinical quality because RR is extracted from electrocardiogram (ECG). This research paper presents a design and validation of a smart textile pressure sensor system that addresses the existing challenges of medical monitoring in NICU. We designed two e-textile, piezoresistive pressure sensors made of Velostat for noninvasive RR monitoring; one was hand-stitched on a mattress topper material, and the other was embroidered on a denim fabric using an industrial embroidery machine. We developed a data acquisition system for validation experiments conducted on a high-fidelity, programmable NICU baby mannequin. We designed a signal processing pipeline to convert raw time-series signals into parameters including RR, rise and fall time, and comparison metrics. The results of the experiments showed that the relative accuracies of hand-stitched sensors were 98.68 (top sensor) and 98.07 (bottom sensor), while the accuracies of embroidered sensors were 99.37 (left sensor) and 99.39 (right sensor) for the 60 BrPM test case. The presented prototype system shows promising results and demands more research on textile design, human factors, and human experimentation.

Fresh Perspectives on Hospital-Acquired Neonatal Skin Injury Period Prevalence From a Multicenter Study: Length of Stay, Acuity, and Incomplete Course of Antenatal Steroids

The objective of this study was to explore neonatal skin injury period prevalence, classification, and risk factors. Skin injury period prevalence over 9 months and χ2, Mann-Whitney U, and independent-samples t tests compared injured and noninjured neonates, with P values less than .05 considered statistically significant. Injury prediction models were developed using Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis for the entire cohort and separately for those classified as high or low acuity. The study took place in 3 Australian and New Zealand units. Neonates enrolled (N = 501) had a mean birth gestational age of 33.48 ± 4.61 weeks and weight of 2138.81 ± 998.92 g. Of the 501 enrolled neonates, 206 sustained skin injuries (41.1%), resulting in 391 injuries to the feet (16.4%; n = 64), cheek (12.5%; n = 49), and nose (11.3%; n = 44). Medical devices were directly associated with 61.4% (n = 240) of injuries; of these medical devices, 50.0% (n = 120) were unable to be repositioned and remained in a fixed position for treatment duration. The strongest predictor of skin injury was birth gestation of 30 weeks or less, followed by length of stay of more than 12 days, and birth weight of less than 1255 g. Prediction for injury based on illness acuity identified neonates less than 30 weeks' gestation and length of stay more than 39 days were at a greater risk (high acuity), as well as neonates less than 33 weeks' gestation and length of stay of more than 9 days (low acuity). More than 40% of hospitalized neonates acquired skin injury, of which the majority skin injuries were associated with medical devices required to sustain life. Increased neonatal clinician education and improved skin injury frameworks, informed by neonatal epidemiological data, are vital for the development of effective prevention strategies.

Medical adhesive-related skin injuries in the neonatology department of a teaching hospital

BACKGROUND

Medical adhesives are used to affix components to the skin. They are part of procedures performed by medical specialties because of their participation as constituents of different products, such as tapes, dressings, and electrodes.

AIM

This study aims to assess the prevalence of, and factors associated with, the development of medical adhesive-related skin injuries (MARSIs) in patients treated with medical tapes in the neonatology department of a large teaching hospital in Brazil.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study.

METHODS

All premature newborns (gestational age from 28 to <37 weeks) admitted in the neonatal intensive care unit of a teaching hospital, from March to August 2019, were followed up. Neonate skin condition was assessed based on the Neonatal Skin Condition Scale (NSCS). Data analyses were conducted in R software.

RESULTS

In total, 46 premature newborns were included in the study; 552 evaluations were performed-mean of 11.7 per patient. Most neonates (n = 41; 89.1%) used adhesive tapes, either paper tape (n = 37; 80.4%) or transparent film dressing (n = 34; 73.9%). Newborns' face and head were the most affected body regions (n = 125; 50.2%). Eight patients had MARSIs (19.5% of patients who used tape). NSCS scores (P value <.001) and the adopted warming system (P value = .01302) were associated with the occurrence of MARSIs. Incubators seem to be a protective factor for MARSI (OR = 0.048; IC95% = 0.0008-0.75; P value = .013).

CONCLUSION

Adhesive tapes in premature newborns should be considered a risk factor for injuries. Although NSCS showed mild-to-moderate impairment and lesion severity was low, this event is relatively frequent in neonatal units.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Awareness of the risk associated with adhesive tape application and removal in newborns allow health services to better address the problem by enforcing good practices, elaborating better protocols, qualifying the health care professionals, and potentially selecting softer tapes for neonates.

Sustained Reduction of Nasal Pressure Injuries in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit With the Use of Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: A Quality Improvement Project

PURPOSE

The purpose of this interprofessional team-driven quality improvement project was to implement a Bubble continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) Skincare Protocol proactively to prevent potential device-related pressure injuries.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

The setting was a level 3, 60-bed single patient room neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) located within a Midwest urban academic medical center with more than 200 healthcare providers. Prior to the beginning of this project, the NICU had been using the CPAP apparatus that had documented 6 nasal pressure injuries over a 6-month period. Because of ease of use, the NICU moved to using Bubble CPAP (BCPAP), which is known to place patients at a higher risk of nasal pressure injuries due to the way the apparatus sits inside the nares.

APPROACH

An evidence-based practice model provided the guiding framework for the development of our BCPAP Skincare Protocol. Knowing that the unit had already documented nasal pressure injuries, the interprofessional-devised protocol was developed to decrease the risk of nasal injuries with the use of BCPAP in premature infants. The protocol was disseminated via an all-healthcare provider educational program.

OUTCOMES

During the first 3 months postprotocol implementation period, one stage 2 nasal injury was noted and immediately treated and healed without incident. During the next 24-month, postimplementation period, there were zero nasal pressure injuries reported.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The healthcare providers found that using an interprofessional team approach in developing and implementing an evidence-based BCPAP Skincare Protocol reduced the incidence of nasal pressure injuries associated with the use of BCPAP in the NICU.

VALIDATION OF NURSING INTERVENTIONS TO PREVENT SKIN LESIONS IN HOSPITALIZED NEWBORNS

ABSTRACT Objective to determine the content validity of Nursing interventions to prevent skin lesions in hospitalized newborns, with an experts committee. Method a content validation methodological research study conducted by means of an online form between April and June 2018. The participants were five nurses from different Brazilian regions, with experience in the neonatal area: two professors, two stomatherapists, and one assistance nurse. The interventions evaluated were constructed based on scientific knowledge, resorting to the literature based on the available evidence, technical manuals and books, in addition to the researchers' experience in care for the newborn. The content was validated in two rounds. First, each intervention and its set were evaluated regarding agreement, using a minimum Committee Agreement Index (CAI) of 80%. Subsequently, a minimum Content Validity Index (CVI) of 0.8 was used to validate the clarity and relevance of the interventions. Results a total of 298 interventions were evaluated in the first round, and only eight did not obtain the adequate index. 39 interventions were evaluated in the second round, all reformulated based on the suggestions of the experts committee. Of these, there were eight not validated in the first round, 20 with small changes, and 11 newly elaborated interventions. All the interventions were validated in the second round, totaling 310 validated interventions. Conclusion the Nursing interventions proposed were considered valid regarding content, and can be used in the care provided to hospitalized newborns, in order to prevent skin lesions and to contribute with the quality of the assistance provided and with the safety of the neonatal patient.

Neonatal skin assessments and injuries: Nomenclature, workplace culture and clinical opinions-Method triangulation a qualitative study

AIM AND OBJECTIVE

To explore and establish the language, clinical opinions and workplace culture around neonatal skin injury nomenclature. Specifically, what nomenclature is used to describe, define, identity and communicate neonatal skin injuries including (a) terms, (b) locations, (c) associated risks and (d) mechanical forces.

BACKGROUND

Skin injuries are affirmed or denied based on visual assessment with findings reported by language rather than measurements. However, if language or nomenclature is ambiguous, assessments could be misinterpreted effecting healthcare delivery.

DESIGN

Qualitative enquiry including applied discourse analysis and between-method triangulation, within a larger exploratory mixed-methods study.

METHODS

Data were collected over two years from four sources: literature, documents, interviews/focus groups and free text injury assessments. Data analysis included content analysis, selective coding and thematic analysis. The collective data were further explored using discourse analysis and triangulation to achieve collective conclusions about opinions, emotions, feelings, perceptions and workplace cultures. The COREQ checklist provided structure for the reporting of study methods, analysis and findings.

RESULTS

A total of 427 data points were collected from literature, documentation and two clinical data sources. Data convergence revealed that neonatal skin injuries are described by numerous terms with preferences for "injury," "trauma" or "redness." Injuries occur in over 20 anatomical locations and risks for injuries included hospitalisation, specific treatments and prematurity. Essential medical devices, clinical condition, lack of clinician experience and overactive neonates were uniquely associated risks. There was incongruency between sources. The literature and documents empathise pressure as the primary force related to skin injury, while varied forces were identified within interviews, focus groups and free text injury assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

The variety of unique terms, locations and risks for injury indicate the need for updated neonatal skin injury frameworks. If frameworks and policies continue to be created without the empirical knowledge of neonatal clinicians, misrepresentation of neonatal skin injury locations and risk will continue to dominate the literature.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The recognition and management of neonatal skin injuries are related to language used to describe assessments in the absence of diagnostic confirmation, which has implications for both the neonate and the healthcare team.

The Phenomenon of Trombley-Brennan Terminal Tissue Injury in a Neonate: A Case Study

BACKGROUND

Trombley-Brennan terminal tissue injury (TB-TTI), also known as skin failure, was first identified in 2009 among critically ill adults receiving palliative care. Identification of this skin injury can be misinterpreted as a pressure ulcer. However, this phenomenon is now accepted as an early sign of impending death among critically ill adults.

CLINICAL FINDINGS

This case study describes TB-TTI in a terminally ill infant in a neonatal intensive care unit evidenced by intact, 2-cm oval skin discoloration on the lateral side of both knees with rapid progression in size.

PRIMARY DIAGNOSIS

TB-TTI was identified on the day of death in an infant with a primary diagnosis of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy born at 32 weeks' gestation.

INTERVENTIONS

The neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) team mobilized the NICU advanced care team, institution's ethical council, and "Team Lavender" to provide infant comfort measures and emotional support to the family and care givers.

OUTCOMES

Infant death occurred 8 hours after TB-TTI was identified.

PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS

To our knowledge, this case study of TB-TTI in a terminally ill neonate in the NICU has not been previously described in the neonatal or pediatric population. Early recognition of the phenomenon can enable the healthcare team to provide timely emotional, spiritual, and psychosocial support to the family and allow time to "be present" with the infant at "end of life." Future work should explore additional signs of TB-TTI and the occurrence rate.

Skin-interfaced biosensors for advanced wireless physiological monitoring in neonatal and pediatric intensive-care units

Standard of care management in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units (NICUs and PICUs) involve continuous monitoring of vital signs with hard-wired devices that adhere to the skin and, in certain instances, include catheter-loaded pressure sensors that insert into the arteries. These protocols involve risks for complications and impediments to clinical care and skin-to-skin contact between parent and child. Here we present a wireless, non-invasive technology that not only offers measurement equivalency to these management standards but also supports a range of important additional features (without limitations or shortcomings of existing approaches), supported by data from pilot clinical studies in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and pediatric ICU (PICU). The combined capabilities of these platforms extend beyond clinical quality measurements of vital signs (heart rate, respiration rate, temperature and blood oxygenation) to include novel modalities for (1) tracking movements and changes in body orientation, (2) quantifying the physiological benefits of skin-to-skin care (e.g. Kangaroo care) for neonates, (3) capturing acoustic signatures of cardiac activity by directly measuring mechanical vibrations generated through the skin on the chest, (4) recording vocal biomarkers associated with tonality and temporal characteristics of crying impervious to confounding ambient noise, and (5) monitoring a reliable surrogate for systolic blood pressure. The results have potential to significantly enhance the quality of neonatal and pediatric critical care.

Predicting Neonatal Skin Injury: The First Step to Reducing Skin Injuries in Neonates

Background

Skin injuries remain common in neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care units. While predicting neonates at risk of skin injury may assist in reducing the incidence of injury, currently there is limited evidence on which tool may be superior.

Methods

A prospective study was completed during November-December 2016 to evaluate the predictive value of the Skin Risk Assessment and Management Tool (SRAMT). Comparisons were made between SRAMT and Neonatal/Infant Braden-Q Scale (BQS) as well as staff's capacity to predict a neonate's risk of skin injury. Data collected included gestation, weight, day of assessment, injury types, causation, medical devices in situ and risk scores.

Results

In total, 248 assessments were completed with 38% (93) recorded skin injuries. Median (interquartile range) gestation and weight at assessment were 36.7 (26.86-56.86) weeks and 2.44 (0.99-4.06) kg, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed the SRAMT had AUC (SE) of 0.94 (0.02) compared with 0.82 (0.03) for BQS (0.011, P < .001). The SRAMT and BQS had sensitivity of [(90.0 (80.5-95.9), 72.86 (60.9-82.8)] and specificity [(88.46 (81.7-93.4), 79.23 (71.2-85.8)], respectively.

Conclusion

In this study, the SRAMT's capacity to predict neonates at risk of injury was higher than the Neonatal BQS and staff. Predicting injuries remains complex and often multifactorial.