Monitoring CD27+ memory B-cells in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders patients treated with rituximab: Results from a bicentric study

Rituximab maintenance treatment outcomes in patients with relapsing neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a monocentric retrospective analysis

Some patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) experience relapse after rituximab (RTX) treatment. In this retrospective study, we analyzed the recurrence-related clinical features, laboratory investigation results, and dosing protocol of 30 female patients with relapsing NMOSD with immunoglobulin G autoantibodies against aquaporin-4 and relapses during repeated 0.5 g RTX infusions as maintenance treatment. The median follow-up period was 6.62 years. Thirty-five episodes were observed, with myelitis being the most frequent. The median expanded disability status scale change score was 0.50. The recurrence rate decreased by 44.23%/year with RTX infusion. Approximately 85.71% of the patients showed relapse without RTX infusion within 10 months. Overall, RTX may be effective for relapsing NMOSD cases.

Monoclonal antibody therapies for aquaporin-4-immunoglobulin G-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease

Monoclonal antibody therapies mark the new era of targeted treatment for relapse prevention in aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-immunoglobulin G (IgG)-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4-IgG+NMOSD). For over a decade, rituximab, an anti-CD20 B-cell-depleting agent, had been the most effectiveness treatment for AQP4-IgG+NMOSD. Tocilizumab, an anti-interleukin-6 receptor, was also observed to be effective. In 2019, several randomized, placebo-controlled trials were completed that demonstrated the remarkable efficacy of eculizumab (anti-C5 complement inhibitor), inebilizumab (anti-CD19 B-cell-depleting agent), and satralizumab (anti-interleukin-6 receptor), leading to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of specific treatments for AQP4-IgG+NMOSD for the first time. Most recently, ravulizumab (anti-C5 complement inhibitor) was also shown to be highly efficacious in an open-label, external-controlled trial. Although only some patients with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) warrant immunotherapy, there is currently no FDA-approved treatment for relapse prevention in MOGAD. Observational studies showed that tocilizumab was associated with a decrease in relapses, whereas rituximab seemed to have less robust effectiveness in MOGAD compared to AQP4-IgG+NMOSD. Herein, we review the evidence on the efficacy and safety of each monoclonal antibody therapy used in AQP4-IgG+NMOSD and MOGAD, including special considerations in children and women of childbearing potential.

Rituximab De-escalation in Patients With Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Exit strategies such as de-escalations have not been evaluated for rituximab in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). We hypothesized that they are associated with disease reactivations and aimed to estimate this risk.

METHODS

We describe a case series of real-world de-escalations from the French NMOSD registry (NOMADMUS). All patients met the 2015 International Panel for NMO Diagnosis (IPND) diagnostic criteria for NMOSD. A computerized screening of the registry extracted patients with rituximab de-escalations and at least 12 months of subsequent follow-up. We searched for 7 de-escalation regimens: scheduled discontinuations or switches to an oral treatment after single infusion cycles, scheduled discontinuations or switches to an oral treatment after periodic infusions, de-escalations before pregnancies, de-escalations after tolerance issues, and increased infusion intervals. Rituximab discontinuations motivated by inefficacy or for unknown purposes were excluded. The primary outcome was the absolute risk of NMOSD reactivation (one or more relapses) at 12 months. AQP4+ and AQP4- serotypes were analyzed separately.

RESULTS

We identified 137 rituximab de-escalations between 2006 and 2019 that corresponded to a predefined group: 13 discontinuations after a single infusion cycle, 6 switches to an oral treatment after a single infusion cycle, 9 discontinuations after periodic infusions, 5 switches to an oral treatment after periodic infusions, 4 de-escalations before pregnancies, 9 de-escalations after tolerance issues, and 91 increased infusion intervals. No group remained relapse-free over the whole de-escalation follow-up (mean: 3.2 years; range: 0.79-9.5), except pregnancies in AQP+ patients. In all groups combined and within 12 months, reactivations occurred after 11/119 de-escalations in patients with AQP4+ NMOSD (9.2%, 95% CI [4.7-15.9]), from 0.69 to 10.0 months, and in 5/18 de-escalations in patients with AQP4- NMOSD (27.8%, 95% CI [9.7-53.5]), from 1.1 to 9.9 months.

DISCUSSION

There is a risk of NMOSD reactivation whatever the rituximab de-escalation regimen.

TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02850705.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class IV evidence that de-escalation of rituximab increases the probability of disease reactivation.

A meaningful exploration of ofatumumab in refractory NMOSD: a case report

Objective

To report the case of a patient with refractory neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), who, despite showing poor response or intolerance to multiple immunosuppressants, was successfully treated with Ofatumumab.

Case presentation

A 42-year-old female was diagnosed with NMOSD in the first episode of the disease. Despite treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone, immunoglobulin, rituximab and immunoadsorption, together with oral steroids, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus, she underwent various adverse events, such as abnormal liver function, repeated infections, fever, rashes, hemorrhagic shock, etc., and experienced five relapses over the ensuing four years. Finally, clinicians decided to initiate Ofatumumab to control the disease. The patient received 9 doses of Ofatumumab over the next 10 months at customized intervals. Her symptoms were stable and there was no recurrence or any adverse events.

Conclusion

Ofatumumab might serve as an effective and safe alternative for NMOSD patients who are resistant to other current immunotherapies.

Systematic Review of Treatment Options and Therapeutic Responses for Lesions of the Sella and Orbit: Evidence-Based Recommendations

OBJECTIVE

Inflammatory pathologies of the sella and orbit are rare but require prompt diagnosis to initiate effective treatment. Because uniform recommendations for treatment are currently lacking, we performed an evidence-based review to identify recommendations.

METHODS

We performed a literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify papers evaluating treatment of inflammatory pathologies of the sella and orbit. We used PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to define recommendations, specifically examining aggregated sample sizes, disease-specific patient follow-up, and clinical trials focused on inflammatory diseases of the sella and orbit.

RESULTS

A total of 169 studies were included and organized by disease pathology. Treatments for various pathologies were recorded. Treatment options included surgery, radiation, steroids, targeted treatments, immunomodulators, intravenous immune globulin, and plasmapheresis. Steroids were the most often employed treatment, second-line management options and timing varied. Pathological diagnosis was highly associated with treatment used. Most evidence were level 3 without available control groups, except for 13 trials in neuromyelitis optica with level 1 or 2 evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first evidence-based review to provide recommendations on specific treatments for pathologies of the orbit and sella. The reported data may be useful to help guide randomized clinical trials and provide resource for clinical management decisions based on the available evidence.

Biomarkers in autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system

The autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) represent individual heterogeneity with different disease entities. Although clinical and imaging features make it possible to characterize larger patient cohorts, they may not provide sufficient evidence to detect disease activity and response to disease modifying drugs. Biomarkers are becoming a powerful tool due to their objectivity and easy access. Biomarkers may indicate various aspects of biological processes in healthy and/or pathological states, or as a response to drug therapy. According to the clinical features described, biomarkers are usually classified into predictive, diagnostic, monitoring and safety biomarkers. Some nerve injury markers, humoral markers, cytokines and immune cells in serum or cerebrospinal fluid have potential roles in disease severity and prognosis in autoimmune diseases occurring in the CNS, which provides a promising approach for clinicians to early intervention and prevention of future disability. Therefore, this review mainly summarizes the potential biomarkers indicated in autoimmune disorders of the CNS.

Therapeutic response to rituximab in seropositive neuromyelitis optica: Experience from a tertiary care center in South India

Objectives

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is a severe central nervous system demyelinating disease caused by autoantibodies to anti-aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin-G (AQP4-IgG). Rituximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD20 cells, is effective in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) in several observational studies and small randomized controlled trials. However, this includes both AQP4-IgG antibody positive and negative cases. Whether rituximab is more effective in seropositive NMO is unknown. The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy of rituximab in seropositive NMO.

Materials and Methods

This single-center ambispective study with retrospective data collection and prospective follow-up included patients with NMOSD who were positive for AQP4-Ig-G and treated with rituximab. Efficacy outcomes assessed were annualized relapse rate (ARR), disability progression by expanded disability status scale (EDSS), very good outcome (defined as no relapse and an EDSS ≤3.5), and persistent antibody positivity. Safety was also monitored.

Results

Between June 2017 and December 2019, 15 AQP4-IgG-positive cases were identified. The mean (± SD) age was 36 ± 17.9 years and 73.3% were females. Transverse myelitis followed by optic neuritis was the most common presentations. Rituximab was initiated after a median period of 19-weeks from the disease onset. The mean number of rituximab doses received was 6.4 ± 2.3. After a mean follow-up duration of 107 ± 74.7 weeks from the first dose of rituximab, ARR significantly reduced from 0.5 ± 0.9 to 0.02 ± 0.08, difference 0.48 ± 0.86 (95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.0009-0.96; P = 0.05). The number of relapses also reduced significantly from 0.6 ± 0.8-0.07 ± 0.26 , a difference of 0.53 ± 0.91 (95% CI, 0.026-1.05; P = 0.041). EDSS also significantly reduced from 5.6 ± 2.5-3.3 ± 2.9 , a difference of 2.23 ± 2.36 (95% CI, 0.93-3.54; P = 0.003). Very good outcome was obtained in 73.3% (11 of 15); P = 0.002. AQP4-IgG remained positive in 66.7% (4 of 6) when repeated after a mean period of 149.5 ± 51.1 weeks after the first dose of rituximab. Neither pre-treatment ARR, EDSS, time to initiate rituximab, the total number of rituximab doses, or time to repeat AQP4-IgG were significantly associated with persistent antibody positivity. No serious adverse events were observed.

Conclusion

Rituximab exhibited high efficacy and good safety in seropositive NMO. Larger trials in this subgroup are warranted to confirm these findings.

B-cell proliferation characteristics and monitoring significance under the modified reduced-dose rituximab regimen for NMOSD: A real-world case series study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the B-cell proliferation characteristics and monitoring significance under the modified reduced-dose rituximab (mRTX) regimen for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD).

METHODS

NMOSD patients treated with mRTX were recruited, and the percentages of total CD19⁺ B cells and CD27⁺ memory B cells were dynamically detected by flow cytometry. The annualized relapse rate (ARR) and expanded disability status scale (EDSS) scores were compared before and after mRTX treatment, and the differences in B-cell values were compared between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients with NMOSD were ultimately enrolled. The EDSS score decreased from 2.5 (1.5, 3.0) to 1.3 (1.0, 2.0), and the ARR decreased from 1.0 (0, 2.0) to 0 (0, 0) (p < 0.001). Relapses occurred in 6 patients, with total CD19⁺ B-cell percentages of 3.25% (2.7%, 3.7%) and CD27⁺ memory B-cell percentages of 0.3% (0.2%, 0.3%) at initial relapse. Twenty-eight patients (82.4%) remained relapse-free with 84 doses of mRTX. Before 56 repeated doses, the total CD19⁺ B cells and CD27⁺ memory B cells were 4.00% (3.14%, 5.32%) and 0.26% (0.17%, 0.40%), respectively. The mean dosing interval was 9.2 months. Both total CD19⁺ B cells and CD27⁺ memory B cells proliferated over time after mRTX use, with significantly faster proliferation rates in the later stages. In 28 relapse-free patients, the mean time to reach 1% for total CD19⁺ B cells was 210 days, and the mean time to reach 3% was 240 days, with the mean interval from 1% to 3% of 65 days. Twenty-five relapse-free patients had no significant differences in maximum, minimum, and mean B-cell values compared to those of 6 patients with relapse.

CONCLUSION

The high rate of B-cell proliferation under the mRTX regimen indicates that closer dynamic B-cell monitoring is required to guide repeated mRTX dosing. Sustained depletion of total CD19⁺ B cells targeting < 3% of lymphocytes may be feasible, enabling extended dosing intervals.

The CELLO trial: Protocol of a planned phase 4 study to assess the efficacy of Ocrelizumab in patients with radiologically isolated syndrome

BACKGROUND

Patients with radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) exhibit CNS lesions suggestive of multiple sclerosis (MS) in the absence of overt neurological symptoms characteristic of the disease. They may have concurrent brain atrophy, subtle cognitive impairment, and intrathecal inflammation. At least half ultimately develop MS, cementing RIS as preclinical MS for many. However, high-quality data, including immunologic biomarkers, to guide treatment decisions in this population are lacking. Early intervention with ocrelizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody approved for relapsing and primary progressive MS that targets CD20+ B-cells, may affect disease course and improve long-term outcomes. The objective of this study is to describe the protocol for CELLO, a clinical trial assessing the effect of ocrelizumab on RIS.

METHODS

The CELLO clinical trial, a phase 4, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted as an academic-industry collaboration, aims to (1) assess the efficacy of ocrelizumab in patients with RIS and (2) identify biomarkers indicative of emerging autoimmunity as well as immune recovery after transient B-cell depletion. The study will enroll 100 participants across ≥15 sites. Participants will be aged 18 to 40 years, have RIS (defined as meeting 2017 revised McDonald criteria for dissemination in space), and have either been diagnosed with RIS within the last 5 years or have had new brain lesions identified within 5 years of study entry. A screening program of first-degree relatives of patients with MS will be used to boost recruitment. Eligible patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive 3 courses of ocrelizumab or placebo at baseline, week 24, and week 48. Patients will subsequently be followed up for ≥3 years. The primary outcome is time to development of new radiological or clinical evidence of MS. Secondary and exploratory objectives will investigate neuroimaging, serological and immunologic biomarkers, cognitive function, and patient-reported outcomes. A substudy using single-cell RNA sequencing to characterize blood and CSF immune cells will assess markers associated with conversion to clinical MS.

CONCLUSION

The CELLO study will improve the understanding of B-cell biology in early MS disease pathophysiology, characterize the emergence of CNS autoimmunity, and provide evidence to inform treatment decision-making for individuals with RIS.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV: NCT04877457.

A meta-analysis on efficacy and safety of rituximab for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

BACKGROUND

To assess the efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) in the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum diseases (NMOSDs), and give a guideline on clinical medication.

METHODS

The databases of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wan fang were systematically searched by computer, and the search period was from the establishment of the databases until January 2022. To collect the trials of RTX in the treatment of NMOSDs, two researchers completed literature screening, quality assessment, and data extraction independently. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 15.1 software.

RESULTS

There were 37 studies in the meta-analysis, including 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 32 observational studies. Meta-analysis results revealed that NMOSDs patients treated with RTX significantly reduced the annualized relapse rate (ARR) (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24-1.66, P < .01) and the Expanded disability status scale (EDSS) scores (WMD = 1.34, 95%CI: 1.25-1.44, P < .01). RTX is more effective than azathioprine (AZA) in the treatment of NMOSDs (ARR: WMD = -0.54, 95% CI: -0.75 to -0.33; EDSS: WMD = -0.65, 95% CI: -0.83 to -0.48; P < .0001).There was no difference in ARR and EDSS scores between anti-aquapor in-4-antibody seropositive NMOSD and seronegative NMOSD patients treated with RTX (ARR: WMD = -0.01, 95% CI: -0.25 to 0.24, P = .96 > 0.05; EDSS: WMD = 0, 95% CI: -0.30 to 0.31, P = .99 > 0.05). In this study, 681 patients were recorded safety data of RTX therapy, 23% (156 patients) had adverse events, and 0.7% (5 patients) of NMOSDs discontinued due to severe adverse reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

NMOSDs patients treated with RTX can significantly reduce the relapse frequency and EDSS scores, and also improve neurological dysfunction, besides the efficacy is better than azathioprine. RTX has a high incidence of adverse reactions, which are mild and with certain self limited, it should be cautious in clinical medication.

Early B cells repopulation in multiple sclerosis patients treated with rituximab is not predictive of a risk of relapse or clinical progression

BACKGROUND

It is currently unknown whether early B cell reconstitution (EBR) in MS patients under rituximab is associated with a risk of relapse or progression.

OBJECTIVES

Analyzing EBR in rituximab-treated patients and its putative association with clinical findings.

METHODS

Prospective lymphocytes immunophenotyping was performed in a monocentric cohort of MS patients treated by rituximab for 2 years. EBR was defined when B cells concentration was > 5 cells/mm3. B cell subsets were retrospectively associated with clinical data. Clinical and radiological monitoring included relapses, EDSS (Expanded Disability Status Scale), SDMT (Symbol Digit Modalities Test), and MRI.

RESULTS

182 patients were analyzed (61 remitting-relapsing and 121 progressive-active). 38.5% experienced EBR at least once, but very few (7/182) showed systematic reconstitution. Most patients remained stable upon treatment, regardless of the occurrence of EBR. Dynamics of B cell reconstitution featured increased naïve/transitional B cells, and decreased memory subsets. Homeostasis of the B cell compartment differed at baseline between patients experiencing or not EBR upon treatment. In patients with EBR, reciprocal dynamics of transitional and pro-inflammatory double-negative B cell subsets was associated with better response to rituximab treatment.

CONCLUSION

EBR is common in rituximab-treated MS patients and is not associated with clinical disease activity. EBR in the peripheral blood may reflect regulatory immunological phenomena in subgroup of patients.

Faster B-cell repletion after anti-CD20 infusion in Black patients compared to white patients with neurologic diseases

This retrospective, single-center study aimed to characterize and compare the kinetics of B-cell reemergence following anti-CD20 infusion (anti-CD20i) in African American (AA) and white patients with MS or NMOSD. In a logistic regression model that included race, time since anti-CD20i, body mass index, and diagnosis, only AA race (p=0.01) and time since anti-CD20i (p=0.0003) were significant predictors of B-cell repletion. However, B-cell subset composition was similar between AA and white patients with detectable CD19+ B-cell counts. These findings highlight the importance of including a diverse study population in future studies of anti-CD20 therapies.

Failure of alemtuzumab therapy in three patients with MOG antibody associated disease

BACKGROUND

Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) is most classically associated in both children and adults with phenotypes including bilateral and recurrent optic neuritis (ON) and transverse myelitis (TM), with the absence of brain lesions characteristic of multiple sclerosis (MS). ADEM phenotype is the most common presentation of MOGAD in children. However, the presence of clinical phenotypes including unilateral ON and short TM in some patients with MOGAD may lead to their misdiagnosis as MS. Thus, clinically and radiologically, MOGAD can mimic MS and clinical vigilance is required for accurate diagnostic workup.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present three cases initially diagnosed as MS and then treated with alemtuzumab. Unexpectedly, all three patients did quite poorly on this medication, with a decline in their clinical status with worsening of expanded disability status scale (EDSS) and an increasing lesion load on magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Subsequently, all three cases were found to have anti-MOG antibody in their serum.

CONCLUSIONS

These cases highlight that if a patient suspected to have MS does not respond to conventional treatments such as alemtuzumab, a search for alternative diagnoses such as MOG antibody disease may be warranted.

Secondary Immunodeficiency and Risk of Infection Following Immune Therapies in Neurology

Secondary immunodeficiencies (SIDs) are acquired conditions that may occur as sequelae of immune therapy. In recent years a number of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) has been approved for multiple sclerosis and related disorders such as neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, some of which are frequently also used in- or off-label to treat conditions such as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), myasthenia gravis, myositis, and encephalitis. In this review, we focus on currently available immune therapeutics in neurology to explore their specific modes of action that might contribute to SID, with particular emphasis on their potential to induce secondary antibody deficiency. Considering evidence from clinical trials as well as long-term observational studies related to the patients' immune status and risks of severe infections, we delineate long-term anti-CD20 therapy, with the greatest data availability for rituximab, as a major risk factor for the development of SID, particularly through secondary antibody deficiency. Alemtuzumab and cladribine have relevant effects on circulating B-cell counts; however, evidence for SID mediated by antibody deficiency appears limited and urgently warrants further systematic evaluation. To date, there has been no evidence suggesting that treatment with fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, or natalizumab leads to antibody deficiency. Risk factors predisposing to development of SID include duration of therapy, increasing age, and pre-existing low immunoglobulin (Ig) levels. Prevention strategies of SID comprise awareness of risk factors, individualized treatment protocols, and vaccination concepts. Immune supplementation employing Ig replacement therapy might reduce morbidity and mortality associated with SIDs in neurological conditions. In light of the broad range of existing and emerging therapies, the potential for SID warrants urgent consideration among neurologists and other healthcare professionals.

A comparison of the effects of rituximab versus other immunotherapies for MOG-IgG-associated central nervous system demyelination: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody disease (MOG-AD) is now recognised as a nosological entity with specific clinical and paraclinical features to aid early diagnosis. Rituximab (RTX) is a chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against CD20 epitope expressed on pre-B and mature B cells and is used to treat B-cell-derived lymphoid neoplasms and antibody-mediated autoimmune diseases. In this review, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate RTX efficacy and assessed the treatment efficacies based on relapse rates.

METHODS

This study was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic review and Meta-Analysis) statement. We searched for publications on the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, clinical trials up to December 2020. We compiled 5 studies, Meta-analysis forest plots was conducted for the ARR ratio change pre and post-treatment between rituximab and other disease modifying drugs. A sensitivity analysis was performed with mean difference (MD) of the efficacy of RTX versus other immunotherapies and subgroup analysis was also performed based on site of study.

RESULTS

A meta-analysis of 5 studies with 239 participants was conducted. Patients have received rituximab were recorded in 82 of 239 (34.31%). The mean difference of ARR ratio of rituximab therapy versus other immunotherapies was 0.16 (95%CI, -0.15 to 0.47). No studies found to significantly affect heterogeneity. No major differences occurred in 9.2% of China patients (95% CI: -0.20-1.86; I2=0%) and 90.8% of non- China patients (95% CI: -0.24-0.42; I2=0%). Meanwhile there was no significant subgroup difference (p = 0.18) between them.

CONCLUSION

RTX reduces the relapse frequency in most patients with MOG antibody disease, but there is no differences between rituximab and other immunotherapies in MOG antibody disease. Future a large multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial to thoroughly characterize the efficacy of rituximab for MOG antibody disease is necessary.

Efficacy of Low-Dose Rituximab on Neuromyelitis Optica-Associated Optic Neuritis

Purpose: To prospectively investigate the efficacy and tolerance of low-dose rituximab (RTX) for the treatment of neuromyelitis optica-associated optic neuritis (NMO-ON). Methods: Optic Neuritis patients with seropositive aquaporin 4-antibody (AQP4-Ab) were diagnosed with NMO-ON and recruited for treatment with low-dose RTX (100 mg * 4 infusions) and were then followed monthly for a minimum of 3 months. Reinfusion of 100 mg RTX was given when the CD19+ B lymphocyte frequency was elevated to above 1%. The serum AQP4-Ab level was tested by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results: A total of 43 NMO-ON patients (1 male/42 female, 75 involved eyes) were included in this study. CD19+ B cell clearance in the peripheral blood was induced in 97.7% of patients after induction treatment. A significant decrease in serum AQP4-Ab concentration was observed after induction treatment (P = 0.0123). The maintenance time of B cell clearance was 5.2 ± 2.25 months. The relapse-free rate was 92.3% in patients followed-up for over 12 months, and patients with non-organ-specific autoimmune antibodies tended to relapse within 6 months. A total of 96.2% of patients had stable or improved vision, and a decrease in the average expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score was found. Structural alterations revealed by optic coherence tomography were observed in both ON and unaffected eyes. The rates of infusion-related reactions and long-term adverse events (AEs) were 18.6 and 23.1%, respectively. No severe AEs was observed. Conclusions: Low-dose rituximab is efficient and well-tolerated in treating NMO-ON.

New Therapeutic Landscape in Neuromyelitis Optica

Purpose of review

This review discusses the current treatment trends and emerging therapeutic landscape for patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD).

Recent findings

Conventional immune suppressive therapies, such as B cell depletion, have been used for long-term treatment. However, the availability of recent FDA-approved and investigational drugs has made therapeutic choices for NMOSD more complex.

Summary

Recent randomized clinical trials have shown that eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab are efficacious therapies for AQP4 seropositive NMOSD. These therapies may not have the same benefit in patients with seronegative NMOSD, including MOG-associated disease, and further investigation is required in this population. Reliable biomarkers to guide therapy decisions are urgently needed. There is a plethora of promising investigational therapies currently in the pipeline with exciting and novel mechanisms of action.

Efficacy of rituximab in the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: An update systematic review and meta -analysis

BACKGROUND

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) is an autoimmune astrocyte disease that mainly affects the optic nerve and spinal cord resulting in blindness or paralysis. Rituximab (RTX) is a chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against the surface antigen of CD20 on B lymphocytes and is an emerging treatment option in NMOSD. The present review aimed to conduct an update systematic review and meta-analysis for the efficacy of RTX in the treatment of NMOSD and analyze main factors affecting the efficacy of RTX.

METHODS

The following Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) and related entry terms are used to search English literature in PubMed, MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases, respectively. MeSH include: Neuromyelitis optic and Rituximab; entry terms include: NMO Spectrum Disorder, NMO Spectrum Disorders, Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) Spectrum Disorder, Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders, Devic Neuromyelitis Optica, Neuromyelitis Optica, Devic, Devic's Disease, Devic Syndrome, Devic's Neuromyelitis Optica, Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) Spectrum Disorders, CD20 Antibody, Rituximab CD20 Antibody, Mabthera, IDEC-C2B8 Antibody, GP2013, Rituxan; (note: literature retrieval operators "AND" "OR" "NOT" are used to link MeSH with Entry Terms.) 54 studies were included in this systematic review and 29 studies were included in meta-analysis. The main efficacy indicators were the difference of the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) and annualized relapse rate (ARR) between before and after rituximab treatments.

RESULTS

In 29 studies involving 732 patients (643 women, 84 men, 5 with unknown gender), the EDSS and ARR were reduced by an average of -0.57 (95%CI, -0.69 to -0.44), -1.57 (95%CI, -1.78 to -1.35), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our systematic review and update meta-analysis provide new evidences that RTX can effectively improve disability and reduce ARR ratio.

Targeting B cells to modify MS, NMOSD, and MOGAD: Part 2

Ocrelizumab, rituximab, ofatumumab, ublituximab, inebilizumab, and evobrutinib are immunotherapies that target various B cell–related proteins. Most of these treatments have proven efficacy in relapsing and progressive forms of MS and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disease (NMOSD) or are in advanced stages of clinical development. Currently, ocrelizumab and inebilizumab are licensed for treatment of MS and NMOSD, respectively. This part of the review focuses on monoclonal antibody B cell–depleting strategies in NMOSD and the emerging related myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) immunoglobulin G–associated disease (MOGAD). Case series and phase 2/3 studies in these inflammatory disorders are assessed. The safety profile of long-term B-cell depletion in MS, NMOSD, and MOGAD will be highlighted. Finally implications of the current coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on the management of patients with these disorders and the use of B cell–depleting agents will be discussed.

Emerging Targeted Therapies for Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an autoimmune, inflammatory disorder of the central nervous system that typically presents with recurrent episodes of optic neuritis, longitudinally extensive myelitis, brainstem, diencephalic, and cerebral syndromes. Up to 80% of NMOSD patients have a circulating pathogenic autoantibody that targets the water channel aquaporin-4 (AQP4-IgG). The discovery of AQP4-IgG transformed our understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease and its possible treatment targets. Monoclonal antibodies targeting terminal complement (eculizumab), CD19 (inebilizumab), and the interleukin-6 receptor (satralizumab) have demonstrated efficacy in NMOSD attack prevention in recent phase 3 trials and have gained subsequent regulatory approval in the USA and other countries. We aim to review the evidence supporting the efficacy of these new drugs.

Role of B Cells in Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders

The success of clinical trials of selective B-cell depletion in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) and primary progressive MS has led to a conceptual shift in the understanding of MS pathogenesis, away from the classical model in which T cells were the sole central actors and toward a more complex paradigm with B cells having an essential role in both the inflammatory and neurodegenerative components of the disease process. The role of B cells in MS was selected as the topic of the 27th Annual Meeting of the European Charcot Foundation. Results of the meeting are presented in this concise review, which recaps current concepts underlying the biology and therapeutic rationale behind B-cell-directed therapeutics in MS, and proposes strategies to optimize the use of existing anti-B-cell treatments and provide future directions for research in this area. ANN NEUROL 2021;89:13-23.

Treatment of MOG-IgG-associated disorder with rituximab: An international study of 121 patients

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of anti-CD20 B-cell depletion with rituximab (RTX) on relapse rates in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disorder (MOGAD).

METHODS

Retrospective review of RTX-treated MOGAD patients from 29 centres in 13 countries. The primary outcome measure was change in relapse rate after starting rituximab (Poisson regression model).

RESULTS

Data on 121 patients were analysed, including 30 (24.8%) children. Twenty/121 (16.5%) were treated after one attack, of whom 14/20 (70.0%) remained relapse-free after median (IQR) 11.2 (6.3-14.1) months. The remainder (101/121, 83.5%) were treated after two or more attacks, of whom 53/101 (52.5%) remained relapse-free after median 12.1 (6.3-24.9) months. In this 'relapsing group', relapse rate declined by 37% (95%CI=19-52%, p<0.001) overall, 63% (95%CI=35-79%, p = 0.001) when RTX was used first line (n = 47), and 26% (95%CI=2-44%, p = 0.038) when used after other steroid-sparing immunotherapies (n = 54). Predicted 1-year and 2-year relapse-free survival was 79% and 55% for first-line RTX therapy, and 38% and 18% for second-/third-line therapy. Circulating CD19+B-cells were suppressed to <1% of total circulating lymphocyte population at the time of 45/57 (78.9%) relapses.

CONCLUSION

RTX reduced relapse rates in MOGAD. However, many patients continued to relapse despite apparent B-cell depletion. Prospective controlled studies are needed to validate these results.

Emerging drugs for the treatment of neuromyelitis optica

INTRODUCTION

Evidence-based treatment options for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) patients are beginning to enter the market. Where previously, there was only the exclusive use of empiric and off-label immunosuppressants in this rare and devastating central nervous system autoimmune disease.

AREAS COVERED

In accordance to expanding pathogenetic insights, drugs in phase II and III clinical trials are presented in the context of the current treatment situation for acute attacks and immunopreventative strategies in NMOSD. Some such drugs are the 2019-approved complement inhibitor eculizumab, other compounds in late development include its modified successor ravulizumab, IL-6 receptor antibody satralizumab, CD19 targeting antibody inebilizumab and the TACI-Fc fusion protein telitacicept.

EXPERT OPINION

Moving from broad immunosuppression to tailored treatment strategies, the prospects for efficient NMOSD therapy are positive. For the first time in this disease, class I treatment evidence is available, but long-term data will be necessary to confirm the overall promising study results of the compounds close to approval. While drug development still centers around AQP4 antibody seropositive patients, current and future research requires consideration of possible diverging treatment demands for the smaller group of seronegative patients and patients with presence of MOG antibodies.

Do modern therapies change natural history of Neuromyelitis optica?

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an uncommon antibody-mediated disease of the central nervous system. Approximately 75% of patients have antibodies against aquaporin-4, a water channel expressed on astrocytes. Untreated, approximately 50% of NMOSD patients will be wheelchair users and blind, and a third will have died within 5 years of their first attack. Unlike multiple sclerosis, a progressive clinical course is very unusual and the accrual of disability is related to relapses. Aggressive treatment of attacks and highly efficient maintenance therapies to prevent attacks are therefore crucial to prevent residual disability. In this article, we review how high dose steroids and most importantly apheresis and modern therapies implicating B cell depletion, inhibition of complement and IL-6 reception are effective to change its natural history. We will emphasize the results of three recent double blind randomized controlled studies using monoclonal antibodies allowing strong hope to modify natural history of NMOSD.

Differential Effects of MS Therapeutics on B Cells-Implications for Their Use and Failure in AQP4-Positive NMOSD Patients

B cells are considered major contributors to multiple sclerosis (MS) pathophysiology. While lately approved disease-modifying drugs like ocrelizumab deplete B cells directly, most MS medications were not primarily designed to target B cells. Here, we review the current understanding how approved MS medications affect peripheral B lymphocytes in humans. These highly contrasting effects are of substantial importance when considering these drugs as therapy for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), a frequent differential diagnosis to MS, which is considered being a primarily B cell- and antibody-driven diseases. Data indicates that MS medications, which deplete B cells or induce an anti-inflammatory phenotype of the remaining ones, were effective and safe in aquaporin-4 antibody positive NMOSD. In contrast, drugs such as natalizumab and interferon-β, which lead to activation and accumulation of B cells in the peripheral blood, lack efficacy or even induce catastrophic disease activity in NMOSD. Hence, we conclude that the differential effect of MS drugs on B cells is one potential parameter determining the therapeutic efficacy or failure in antibody-dependent diseases like seropositive NMOSD.

The ISCCA flow protocol for the monitoring of anti-CD20 therapies in autoimmune disorders

BACKGROUND

Anti-CD20 monoclonals (MoAbs) are used in a variety of autoimmune disorders. The aim is to eliminate memory B cells sustaining the tissue damage and the production of pathogenic autoantibodies, while preserving naïve cells. The disappearance of memory B cells and the repopulation by naïve cells correlate with good clinical response, while the reappearance of memory B cells and plasmablasts correlates with relapse or resistance to therapy. Anti-CD20 induce extremely low B cell levels, requiring high-resolution techniques. The immune monitoring protocol developed by ISCCA is described and validated, to provide a standardized method for the clinical decision-making process during anti-CD20 therapies in autoimmune diseases.

METHODS

A 10-marker, 8-color staining panel (CD20-V450, CD45-V500c, CD4-FITC + sIgM-FITC, CD38-PE, CD3-PerCP Cy5.5, CD19-PE-Cy7, CD27-APC, CD8-APC H7 + sIgG-APC-H7) is used to identify B cells, plasma cells/blasts, naïve and memory B cells, sIgM+ and sIgG-switched memory B cells, T and NK cells, with high-sensitivity analysis (>10⁶ CD45+ cells).

RESULTS

After an anti-CD20 dose, the B cell level is about zero in most patients. If B cells remain virtually absent (<0.1/μl), subsetting is not reliable nor meaningful. If B cells raise >0.3-0.5/μl, subsetting is possible and informative, acquiring >1.0-1.5 × 10⁶ CD45+ events. Further testings can follow the quality of B cell repopulation. If B cells become detectable (>1/μl), the prevalence of memory B cells indicates non-responsiveness or a possible relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

The ISCCA Protocol is proposed for a standardized prospective monitoring of patients with autoimmune disorders, to assist the safe and rational usage of anti-CD20 therapies.

Precision therapy for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A retrospective analysis of the use of class-switched memory B-cells for individualised rituximab dosing schedules

BACKGROUND

B-cell depleting treatments are widely used to modify the course of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Despite recent successful Phase 3 trials of several novel NMOSD therapies, limited availability and high cost constrains their clinical use, and rituximab (RTX) remains a core treatment in many centres. Since 2013, the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Neuroimmunology Clinic (NIC) has regularly measured class-switched memory B-cells (SMB-cells) in the peripheral blood of patients with NMOSD, who have been treated with RTX, in order to guide retreatment intervals.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the management and outcomes of the treated patients, and to determine the effect of SMB-cell monitoring in guiding retreatment intervals.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of hospital records, clinic letters and laboratory data was performed.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients with NMOSD received individualised rituximab dosing at NIC between 2013 and 2018. Fourteen (87.5%) were aquaporin-4 antibody (AQP4-Ab) positive; 1 (6.25%) was myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody (MOG-Ab) positive and 1 (6.25%) was seronegative. After commencement of RTX, individually dosed according to regular measurements of serum SMB-cells, there was a 77.5% reduction in annualised relapse rate over a mean follow-up time of 46.1 months in our recently active NMOSD patients. Their mean retreatment interval was 50.9 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides real-world evidence supporting individualised rituximab dosing in the treatment of NMOSD.

[Neuromyelitis optica and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders]

The review is devoted to up-to-date data on epidemiology, aspects of the pathogenesis of neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). The authors consider a role of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein immunoglobulin G (MOG-IgG) in the syndromes phenotypically similar to NMO and NMOSD. Special attention is drawn to the methods of MOG-IgG antibodies detection and indications for testing. The approaches and management for treatment and prevention of NMO relapses, risks of complications during pregnancy and immediately after delivery, as well as methods for their prevention and treatment, are described.

Pediatric NMOSD: A Review and Position Statement on Approach to Work-Up and Diagnosis

Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD) is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) primarily affecting the optic nerves and spinal cord, but also involving other regions of the CNS including the area postrema, periaqueductal gray matter, and hypothalamus. Knowledge related to pediatric manifestations of NMOSD has grown in recent years, particularly in light of newer information regarding the importance of not only antibodies to aquaporin 4 (AQP4-IgG) but also myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) in children manifesting clinically with this syndrome. In this review, we describe the current state of the knowledge related to clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and chronic therapies for children with NMOSD, with emphasis on literature that has been published in the last 5 years. Following the review, we propose recommendations for the assessment/follow up clinical care, and treatment of this population.

Comparison of the Response to Rituximab between Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein and Aquaporin-4 Antibody Diseases

OBJECTIVE

To compare response to rituximab (RTX) between adult patients positive for myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) and aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibodies.

METHODS

We prospectively studied adult patients with MOG or AQP4 antibodies who received RTX under an individualized dosing schedule adapted to the biological effect of RTX monitored by memory B-cell measurement. Memory B cells were counted monthly and when relapse occurred. The biological effect of RTX was considered significant with <0.05% memory B cells in peripheral blood lymphocytes.

RESULTS

In 16 patients with MOG antibodies and 29 with AQP4 antibodies, mean follow-up was 19 (range = 9-38) and 38 (13-79) months. Under RTX, 10 relapses occurred in 6 of 16 (37.5%) patients with MOG antibodies, and 13 occurred in 7 of 29 (24%) with AQP4 antibodies. The median time of relapse after the most recent infusion was 2.6 (0.6-5.8) and 7 (0.8-13) months, respectively (p < 0.001). Memory B cells had reemerged in 2 of 10 (20%) relapses in patients with MOG antibodies and 12 of 13 (92.5%) with AQP4 antibodies (p < 0.001).

INTERPRETATION

In AQP4 antibody-associated disorder, relapse mostly occurs when the biological effect of RTX decreases, which argues for treatment efficacy. In MOG antibody-associated disorder, the efficacy of RTX is not constant, because one-third of patients showed relapse despite an effective biological effect of RTX. In this subpopulation, memory B-cell depletion was unable to prevent relapse, which was probably caused by different immunological mechanisms. These findings should be used to improve treatment strategies for MOG antibody-associated disorder. ANN NEUROL 2020;87:256-266.

Repeated low-dose rituximab treatment based on the assessment of circulating B cells in patients with refractory myasthenia gravis

Background:

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of repeated low-dose rituximab treatment guided by monitoring circulating CD19+ B cells in patients with refractory myasthenia gravis (MG).

Methods:

Patients with refractory MG who had received rituximab treatment at two teaching hospitals between September 2013 and January 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. The treatment protocol consisted of an induction treatment with low-dose rituximab (375 mg/m² twice with a 2-week interval), followed by retreatment (375 mg/m² once). Retreatment was based on either circulating CD19+ B-cell repopulation or clinical relapse. Outcome measures included the MG Foundation of America (MGFA) clinical classification and postintervention status, prednisolone dose, CD19+ B-cell counts, clinical relapse, and adverse effects.

Results:

Of 17 patients, 11 (65%) achieved the primary endpoint, defined as the minimal manifestation or better status with prednisolone ⩽5 mg/day, after median 7.6 months (range, 2–17 months) following rituximab treatment. Over a median follow up of 24 months (range, 7–49 months), a total of 30 retreatments were undertaken due to clinical relapse without B-cell repopulation (n = 6), on the basis of B-cell repopulation alone (n = 16) and both (n = 8). B-cell recovery appeared to be in parallel with clinical relapse on the group level, although the individual-level association appeared to be modest, with B-cell repopulation observed only at 57% (8/14) of clinical relapses.

Conclusions:

The repeated low-dose rituximab treatment based on the assessment of circulating B-cell depletion could be a cost-effective therapeutic option for refractory MG. Further studies are needed to verify the potentially better cost-effectiveness of low-dose rituximab, and to identify biomarkers that help optimize treatment in MG patients.

Pharmacotherapy for Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders: Current Management and Future Options

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is an inflammatory and demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. Although the prevalence of NMO is low, the rapid and severe impairment observed in patients has led to extensive development of research in the fields of diagnostic criteria and therapy in the past 15 years. With improved understanding of the pathophysiology of NMO and the role of aquaporin-4 (AQP4) or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies, numerous therapeutic approaches have been proposed and are currently undergoing evaluation. In this review, we describe the rationale for existing therapeutics and their benefit/risk ratio. We also discuss the pharmacological and clinical interest of future approaches targeting, among others, B or T cells, the blood-central nervous system barrier, complement, polynuclear cells, AQP4-antibody linkage and AQP4 activity. The numerous agents under development are the result of a major collaborative effort all over the world. After the considerable progress on diagnosis, we are now close to class I evidence for a therapeutic effect of several drugs in NMO spectrum disorders, most notably with the anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody (satralizumab) and anti-complement-5 antibody (eculizumab).

Learning from other autoimmunities to understand targeting of B cells to control multiple sclerosis

Although many suspected autoimmune diseases are thought to be T cell-mediated, the response to therapy indicates that depletion of B cells consistently inhibits disease activity. In multiple sclerosis, it appears that disease suppression is associated with the long-term reduction of memory B cells, which serves as a biomarker for disease activity in many other CD20+ B cell depletion-sensitive, autoimmune diseases. Following B cell depletion, the rapid repopulation by transitional (immature) and naïve (mature) B cells from the bone marrow masks the marked depletion and slow repopulation of lymphoid tissue-derived, memory B cells. This can provide long-term protection from a short treatment cycle. It seems that memory B cells, possibly via T cell stimulation, drive relapsing disease. However, their sequestration in ectopic follicles and the chronic activity of B cells and plasma cells in the central nervous system may drive progressive neurodegeneration directly via antigen-specific mechanisms or indirectly via glial-dependent mechanisms. While unproven, Epstein-Barr virus may be an aetiological trigger of multiple sclerosis. This infects mature B cells, drives the production of memory B cells and possibly provides co-stimulatory signals promoting T cell-independent activation that breaks immune tolerance to generate autoreactivity. Thus, a memory B cell centric mechanism can integrate: potential aetiology, genetics, pathology and response to therapy in multiple sclerosis and other autoimmune conditions with ectopic B cell activation that are responsive to memory B cell-depleting strategies.

Placing CD20-targeted B cell depletion in multiple sclerosis therapeutic scenario: Present and future perspectives

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an acquired demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that traditionally has been considered to be mediated primarily by T cells. Increasing evidence, however, suggests the fundamental role of B cells in the pathogenesis and development of the disease. Recently, anti-CD20 B cell-based therapies have demonstrated impressive and somewhat surprising results in MS, showing profound anti-inflammatory effects with a favorable risk-benefit ratio. Moreover, for the first time in the MS therapeutic scenario, the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody ocrelizumab has been granted for the treatment of the primary progressive form of the disease. In this review, we provide a brief overview about anti-CD20 B cell-based therapies in MS, in the perspective of their influence on the future management of the disease, and of their possible positioning in a new wider therapeutic scenario.

Effectiveness of rituximab in neuromyelitis optica: a meta-analysis

Background

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is a severe inflammatory autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system and often results in paralysis or blindness. Rituximab (RTX) is a mouse–human chimeric monoclonal antibody specific for the CD20 antigen on B lymphocytes and used to treat many autoimmune diseases. Disability and relapses were measured using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and annualized relapse rate (ARR) ratio to evaluate the effectiveness of RTX. This review performed a meta-analysis of the efficacy of RTX in NMO.

Methods

We searched through the databases of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. We compiled 26 studies, in which 18 used ARR ratio, 22 used EDSS score, and 14 used both variables. Differences in the ARR ratio and EDSS score before and after RTX therapy were used as the main efficacy measures. Publication bias was evaluated after the consistency test, and a sensitivity analysis was performed with mean difference (MD) of the efficacy of RTX.

Results

A meta-analysis of 26 studies with 577 participants was conducted. Antibodies against aquaporin-4 autoantibody were recorded in 435 of 577 (75.39%) patients with NMO. RTX therapy resulted in a mean (WMD) − 1.56 (95% CI, − 1.82 to − 1.29) reduction in the mean ARR ratio and a mean (WMD) − 1.16 (95% CI, − 1.36 to − 0.96) reduction in the mean EDSS score. A total of 330 of 528 patients (62.9%) reached the relapse-free state. A total of 95 of 577 (16.46%) patients had adverse reactions.

Conclusions

RTX has acceptable tolerance, reduces the relapse frequency, and improves disability in most patients with NMO. Future studies should focus on reducing the health-care costs, improving the functional outcomes, and reducing the adverse effects associated with RTX treatment.

The Expanding Field of Secondary Antibody Deficiency: Causes, Diagnosis, and Management

Antibody deficiency or hypogammaglobulinemia can have primary or secondary etiologies. Primary antibody deficiency (PAD) is the result of intrinsic genetic defects, whereas secondary antibody deficiency may arise as a consequence of underlying conditions or medication use. On a global level, malnutrition, HIV, and malaria are major causes of secondary immunodeficiency. In this review we consider secondary antibody deficiency, for which common causes include hematological malignancies, such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia or multiple myeloma, and their treatment, protein-losing states, and side effects of a number of immunosuppressive agents and procedures involved in solid organ transplantation. Secondary antibody deficiency is not only much more common than PAD, but is also being increasingly recognized with the wider and more prolonged use of a growing list of agents targeting B cells. SAD may thus present to a broad range of specialties and is associated with an increased risk of infection. Early diagnosis and intervention is key to avoiding morbidity and mortality. Optimizing treatment requires careful clinical and laboratory assessment and may involve close monitoring of risk parameters, vaccination, antibiotic strategies, and in some patients, immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT). This review discusses the rapidly evolving list of underlying causes of secondary antibody deficiency, specifically focusing on therapies targeting B cells, alongside recent advances in screening, biomarkers of risk for the development of secondary antibody deficiency, diagnosis, monitoring, and management.

Rituximab in neurological disease: principles, evidence and practice

Rituximab is a widely used B-cell-depleting monoclonal antibody. It is unlicensed for use in neurological disorders and there are no treatment guidelines. However, as a rapidly acting, targeted therapy with growing evidence of efficacy and tolerability in several neuroinflammatory disorders, it is an attractive alternative to conventional immunomodulatory medications. This practical review aims to explain the basic principles of B-cell depletion with therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. We present the evidence for using rituximab in neurological diseases, and describe the practical aspects of prescribing, including dosing, monitoring, safety, treatment failure and its use in special circumstances such as coexisting viral hepatitis, pregnancy and lactation. We provide an administration guide, checklist and patient information leaflet, which can be adapted for local use. Finally, we review the safety data of rituximab and ocrelizumab (a newer and recently licensed B-cell-depleting therapy for multiple sclerosis) and suggest monitoring and risk reduction strategies.

Individualized B cell-targeting therapy for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an autoimmune inflammatory disease of the central nervous system characterized by severe attacks of optic neuritis (ON), longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM), and area postrema syndrome. The majority of patients with NMOSD are seropositive for autoantibodies against the astrocyte water channel aquaporin-4 (AQP4). As convergent clinical and laboratory-based investigations have indicated that B cells play a fundamental role in NMO immunopathology, B cells have become an attractive therapeutic target. Rituximab is a therapeutic monoclonal antibody against CD20 expressed on B cells and increasingly used for the treatment of NMOSD. Although there is robust evidence for the efficacy and safety of rituximab in NMOSD, considerable variability has been noted in biological and clinical responses in patients. Therefore, the focus now is on understanding the mechanisms underlying the variability in response to rituximab and optimizing the use of rituximab for NMOSD. Identification of biomarkers for prediction of clinical response, and effective dosing and timing of treatment may provide useful tools for patient-tailored treatment in NMOSD. Herein, we review current evidence on factors that affect biological and clinical responses to rituximab and highlight the importance of individualized therapies for NMOSD.