Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes with onconeural antibodies: A single center retrospective study

Co-existence of anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase-65 and anti-sry-like high-mobility group box receptor antibody-associated autoimmune encephalitis: A rare case report

Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) has been increasingly recognized in children. An 11-year-old Saudi boy presented with prodromal symptoms of fever and headache followed by behavioral changes, cognitive impairment, and focal seizures. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis showed pleocytosis. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery hyperintensities involving the temporal, parietal and frontal lobes. Electroencephalography revealed diffuse encephalopathy and electrographic seizures. AE was suspected; intravenous methylprednisolone and immunoglobulin were administered. Autoantibodies against glutamic acid decarboxylase-65 were detected in his serum and CSF and against Sry-like high- mobility group box 1 in his serum only. The patient was diagnosed with seropositive AE and favorably responded to intensive immunosuppressive therapy.

Optimizing the diagnostic performance of neural antibody testing for paraneoplastic and autoimmune encephalitis in clinical practice

The detection of neural antibodies in patients with paraneoplastic and autoimmune encephalitis has majorly advanced the diagnosis and management of neural antibody-associated diseases. Although testing for these antibodies has historically been restricted to specialized centers, assay commercialization has made this testing available to clinical chemistry laboratories worldwide. This improved test accessibility has led to reduced turnaround time and expedited diagnosis, which are beneficial to patient care. However, as the utilization of these assays has increased, so too has the need to evaluate how they perform in the clinical setting. In this chapter, we discuss assays for neural antibody detection that are in routine use, draw attention to their limitations and provide strategies to help clinicians and laboratorians overcome them, all with the aim of optimizing neural antibody testing for paraneoplastic and autoimmune encephalitis in clinical practice.

Clinical Impact of Pre-Existing Autoantibodies in Patients With SCLC Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study

Introduction

Although pretreatment autoantibodies have been associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment efficacy in some types of cancer, their importance has not been evaluated in patients with SCLC.

Methods

A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted on a total of 52 patients with extensive-disease SCLC who received immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy as the first-line treatment at either of the six participating centers in Japan. Pretreatment serum samples were collected and analyzed for autoantibodies (rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibodies, and antithyroid). Moreover, 12 antineuronal antibodies (AMPH, CV2, PNMA2, Ri, Yo, Hu, Recoverin, SOX1, Titin, Zic4, GAD65, and Tr) were analyzed using immunoblot assays. The primary end point was the incidence of irAEs with or without autoantibodies. The secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) on the basis of the presence or absence of autoantibodies.

Results

PFS and OS were 4.4 and 25.3 months, respectively. Autoantibodies (rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibodies, and antithyroid antibodies) were detected in 29 patients (56%). In total, irAEs were observed in 18 patients (35%); irAE incidence was 48% in the autoantibody-positive group and 17% in the autoantibody-negative group (p = 0.039). There was no difference in PFS or OS between patients with and without autoantibodies (4.4 mo versus 4.6 mo, p = 0.36; 15.3 mo versus 18.2 mo, p = 0.36). Antineuronal antibodies were detected in 16 patients (31%). However, the development of neurologic irAEs was not observed in both groups.

Conclusions

Vigilance is required against the development of irAEs in pretreatment antibody-positive patients.

Anti-titin antibodies are associated with myocarditis in patients with myasthenia gravis

BACKGROUND

Myasthenia gravis (MG) can affect cardiac muscles with variable presentations. Myocarditis is a rare but potentially serious cardiac manifestation of MG. Although thymomas and anti-titin antibodies have been suggested as risk factors for myocarditis in patients with MG, their independent influence on myocarditis has rarely been assessed.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted on 247 patients diagnosed with MG who were tested for anti-titin antibodies. Myocarditis was diagnosed on the basis of the European Society of Cardiology 2013 Task Force criteria for clinically suspected myocarditis. Patients were classified into myocarditis-positive and myocarditis-negative groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to analyze the risk factors for myocarditis.

RESULTS

Of the 247 patients, 25 (10.1%) were myocarditis-positive and 222 (89.9%) were myocarditis-negative. Anti-titin antibody positivity was higher in the myocarditis-positive group than in the myocarditis-negative group (68.0% vs. 28.4%, p < 0.001). A history of MG crisis was more frequent in the myocarditis-positive group than in the myocarditis-negative group (64.0% vs. 10.4%, p < 0.001). The presence of anti-titin antibodies (odds ratio [OR] 7.906; confidence interval [CI] 2.460-25.401) and MG crisis (OR 24.807; CI 7.476-82.311) was significantly associated with myocarditis. The Cox regression model showed that the anti-titin antibody levels (hazard ratio [HR] 3.639; 95% CI 1.557-8.505) and MG crisis (HR 6.137; 95% CI 2.639-14.272) were significant risk factors for the development of myocarditis.

CONCLUSION

The presence of anti-titin antibody was associated with myocarditis in patients with MG, whereas thymoma was not. Although rare, early suspicion of myocarditis could be required, especially in patients with MG having anti-titin antibodies.

Update in autoimmune and paraneoplastic myelopathies: Newly described antigen targets and antibody testing

Myelopathy is an increasingly recognized presentation of many antibody-mediated neuroinflammatory disorders. While specific features of certain autoimmune myelopathies such as aquaporin-4 antibody associated neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein associated disorder (MOGAD) are well-characterized, other less commonly seen antibody-associated myelopathies are not as well-defined. These include but are not limited to, Hu/ANNA1, anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), anti-CV2/collapsin response mediator protein (CRMP5), and amphiphysin. Here, we review the mentioned more common antibody mediated myelopathies as well those that as less common, followed by a review of differentials that may mimic these disorders.

Anti-neuron antibody syndrome: clinical features, cytokines/chemokines and predictors

BACKGROUND

Neuroimmunology is a rapidly expanding field, and there have been recent discoveries of new antibodies and neurological syndromes. Most of the current clinical studies have focused on disorders involving one specific antibody. We have summarized a class of antibodies that target common neuronal epitopes, and we have proposed the term "anti-neuron antibody syndrome" (ANAS). In this study, we aimed to clarify the clinical range and analyse the clinical features, cytokines/chemokines and predictors in ANAS.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study investigating patients with neurological manifestations that were positive for anti-neuron antibodies.

RESULTS

A total of 110 patients were identified, of which 43 patients were classified as having autoimmune encephalitis (AE) and the other 67 were classified as having paraneoplastic neurological syndrome (PNS). With regards to anti-neuron antibodies, 42 patients tested positive for anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antibody, 19 for anti-Hu, 14 for anti-Yo and 12 for anti-PNMA2 (Ma2). There were significant differences between the ANAS and control groups in serum B cell-activating factor (BAFF) levels and in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) C-X-C motif chemokine10 (CXCL10), CXCL13, interleukin10 (IL10), BAFF and transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ1) levels. Predictors of poor outcomes included having tumours (P = 0.0193) and having a chronic onset (P = 0.0306), and predictors of relapses included having lower levels of CSF BAFF (P = 0.0491) and having a larger ratio of serum TGFβ1/serum CXCL13 (P = 0.0182).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with ANAS had a relatively good prognosis. Having tumours and a chronic onset were both associated with poor outcomes. CSF BAFF and the ratio of serum TGFβ1/serum CXCL13 were associated with relapses.

A single center retrospective study of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes with positive onconeural antibodies

Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) are rare immune-mediated disorders, and the detection of onconeural antibodies is helpful for PNS diagnosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with PNS with positive onconeural antibodies in a single center in Hubei, China. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics of 54 patients with positive onconeural antibodies from January 2016 to September 2020. Among 780 patients with suspected PNS, 54 (6.9%) had positive onconeural antibodies. Of those 54 patients, 28 (51.8%) were diagnosed with definite PNS and 13 (24.1%) with possible PNS. Eighteen (33.3%) patients were confirmed with cancer. Ten PNS syndromes were detected among the 28 patients with definite PNS, and they had either classical (12/28, 42.8%) or non-classical syndromes (17/28, 60.7%). Peripheral neuropathy (9/28, 32.1%), subacute cerebellar degeneration (4/28, 14.3%), and limbic encephalitis (4/28, 14.3%) were the most common PNS syndromes. The anti-CV2/CRMP5-antibody was observed most frequently. Lung cancer was the most common tumor type. For patients with possible PNS, peripheral neuropathy was the most common PNS syndrome, and the anti-Tr-antibody was the most frequent onconeural antibody. Immunotherapy was effective in treating PNS. The anti-CV2/CRMP5-antibody was the most subsequently observed antibody. The manifestations of PNS are diverse and include peripheral neuropathy, subacute cerebellar degeneration, and limbic encephalitis. In patients with PNS, lung cancer was the most common tumor.

Evaluating the frequency of positive paraneoplastic antibodies and associated malignancy risk

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between malignancy and frequently positive paraneoplastic antibodies.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was carried out for all patients who received paraneoplastic antibody testing in 2013-2014 at a tertiary referral center. Available medical records on included patients were reviewed through July 2020. Patients were divided into antibody positive and negative subgroups. Focused analysis was performed on the subgroup of patients who received testing via a commonly used antibody panel.

RESULTS

A total of 1860 patients (the full cohort) received 19,323 antibody testing via panel or individual antibody testing, and were followed-up for a mean period of 36.2 months (range 0-83 months). Altogether 229 antibodies in 196 patients were positive, and 9 (3.9%) in 7 patients were against onconeuronal antigens. The remaining 220 (96.1%) were positive for mostly antibodies against cell surface or synaptic antigens. A total of 1161 patients received Mayo Clinic paraneoplastic antibody panel tests (the panel cohort), and 14.9% (173) of these patients possessed one or more positive antibodies. For the panel cohort, no difference was found between antibody positive and negative groups with respect to the prevalence of previously existing malignancy (15.6% versus 16.6%, p = 0.745) or incidence of new malignancy (4.0% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.848) during the follow-up period. No difference was observed in the incidence of new malignancy during follow-up between the antibody positive and negative groups for the 7 most frequently positive antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of frequently positive antibodies, mostly to cell surface or synaptic antigens, is not clearly associated with the development of malignancy in the subsequent three years.