Nerve conduction studies in Guillain-Barré syndrome: Influence of timing and value of repeated measurements

Utilizing nerve conduction studies to identify very early Guillain-Barré syndrome and distinguish it from mimics in emergency settings

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Accurately diagnosing Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) in its early stages and distinguishing it from mimics poses challenges. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of an existing electrodiagnostic criterion in very early GBS (VEGBS) for discerning mimics. Additionally, we explored specific electrophysiological abnormalities in VEGBS to design a new diagnostic criterion for more accurate VEGBS diagnosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified all patients with flaccid quadriparesis initially suspected of GBS who underwent nerve conduction studies (NCS) ≤4 days from symptom onset. We then retrieved their NCS data and applied an existing electrodiagnostic criterion for sensitivity and specificity analyses based on the final discharge diagnosis. Furthermore, we designed a new criterion based on the observed electrophysiological abnormalities that have maximum specificity and at least 50% sensitivity.

RESULTS

Among 70 patients suspected of VEGBS, 44 (63%) received a final diagnosis of GBS, while in 26 (37%), the GBS diagnosis was later refuted. Umapathi's definite criterion exhibited a sensitivity of 61.36% and a specificity of 92.31%. The probable and possible groups showed very high sensitivity (90.91% and 100%, respectively); however, specificity was low (57.69% and 30.77%, respectively) in the very early stage. Our proposed criterion demonstrated a sensitivity of 88.64% (CI: 75.44%-96.21%) and a specificity of 96.15% (CI: 80.36%-99.90%).

DISCUSSION

The criterion based on presumed electrophysiological correlates of specific early GBS pathophysiology proved more effective than the existing electrodiagnostic criterion in differentiating VEGBS from mimics.

Serial electrodiagnostic testing: Utility and indications in adult neurological disorders

Although existing guidelines address electrodiagnostic (EDX) testing in identifying neuromuscular conditions, guidance regarding the uses and limitations of serial (or repeat) EDX testing is limited. By assessing neurophysiological change longitudinally across time, serial electrodiagnosis can clarify a diagnosis and potentially provide valuable prognostic information. This monograph presents four broad indications for serial electrodiagnosis in adult peripheral neurological disorders. First, where clinical change has raised suspicion for a new or ongoing lesion, EDX reassessment for spatial spread of abnormality, involvement of previously normal muscle or nerve, and/or evolving pathophysiology can clarify a diagnosis. Second, where diagnosis of a progressive neuromuscular condition is uncertain, electrophysiological data from a second time point can confirm or refute suspicion. Third, to establish prognosis after a static nerve injury, a repeat study can assess the presence and extent of reinnervation. Finally, faced with a limited initial study (as when complicated by patient or environmental factors), a repeat EDX study can supplement missing or limited data to provide needed clarity. Repeat EDX studies carry certain limitations, however, such as with prognostication in the setting of remote or chronic lesions, sensory predominant fascicular injury, or mild axonal injury. Nevertheless, serial electrodiagnosis remains a valuable and underused tool in the diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of neuromuscular conditions.

Serial Nerve Conduction Studies in Guillain-Barré Syndrome: Its Usefulness and Precise Timing

PURPOSE

Nerve conduction study (NCS) is essential for subclassifying Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). It is well known that the GBS subclassification can change through serial NCSs. However, the usefulness of serial NCSs is debatable, especially in patients with early stage GBS.

METHODS

Follow-up NCS data within 3 weeks (early followed NCS, EFN) and within 3 to 10 weeks (late-followed NCS, LFN) were collected from 60 patients with GBS who underwent their first NCS (FN) within 10 days after symptom onset. Each NCS was classified into five subtypes (normal, demyelinating, axonal, inexcitable, and equivocal), according to Hadden's and Rajabally's criteria. We analyzed the frequency of significant changes in classification (SCCs) comprising electrodiagnostic aggravation and subtype shifts between demyelinating and axonal types according to follow-up timing.

RESULTS

Between FN and EFN, 33.3% of patients with Hadden's criteria and 18.3% with Rajabally's criteria showed SCCs. Between FN and LFN, 23.3% of patients with Hadden's criteria and 21.7% with Rajabally's criteria showed SCCs, of which 71.4% (Hadden's criteria) and 46.2% (Rajabally's criteria) already showed SCCs from the EFN. The conditions of delayed SCCs between EFN and LFN were very early FN, mild symptoms at the FN, or persistent electrophysiological deterioration 3 weeks after symptom onset.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial proportion of patients with GBS showed significant changes in neurophysiological classification at the early stage. Serial NCS may be helpful for precise neurophysiological classification. This study suggests that follow-up NCSs should be performed within 3 weeks of symptom onset in patients with GBS in whom FN was performed within 10 days of symptom onset.

European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline on diagnosis and treatment of Guillain-Barré syndrome

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute polyradiculoneuropathy. Symptoms may vary greatly in presentation and severity. Besides weakness and sensory disturbances, patients may have cranial nerve involvement, respiratory insufficiency, autonomic dysfunction and pain. To develop an evidence-based guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of GBS, using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology a Task Force (TF) of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) and the Peripheral Nerve Society (PNS) constructed 14 Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome questions (PICOs) covering diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of GBS, which guided the literature search. Data were extracted and summarised in GRADE Summaries of Findings (for treatment PICOs) or Evidence Tables (for diagnostic and prognostic PICOs). Statements were prepared according to GRADE Evidence-to-Decision (EtD) frameworks. For the six intervention PICOs, evidence-based recommendations are made. For other PICOs, good practice points (GPPs) are formulated. For diagnosis, the principal GPPs are: GBS is more likely if there is a history of recent diarrhoea or respiratory infection; CSF examination is valuable, particularly when the diagnosis is less certain; electrodiagnostic testing is advised to support the diagnosis; testing for anti-ganglioside antibodies is of limited clinical value in most patients with typical motor-sensory GBS, but anti-GQ1b antibody testing should be considered when Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS) is suspected; nodal-paranodal antibodies should be tested when autoimmune nodopathy is suspected; MRI or ultrasound imaging should be considered in atypical cases; and changing the diagnosis to acute-onset chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (A-CIDP) should be considered if progression continues after 8 weeks from onset, which occurs in around 5% of patients initially diagnosed with GBS. For treatment, the TF recommends intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) 0.4 g/kg for 5 days, in patients within 2 weeks (GPP also within 2-4 weeks) after onset of weakness if unable to walk unaided, or a course of plasma exchange (PE) 12-15 L in four to five exchanges over 1-2 weeks, in patients within 4 weeks after onset of weakness if unable to walk unaided. The TF recommends against a second IVIg course in GBS patients with a poor prognosis; recommends against using oral corticosteroids, and weakly recommends against using IV corticosteroids; does not recommend PE followed immediately by IVIg; weakly recommends gabapentinoids, tricyclic antidepressants or carbamazepine for treatment of pain; does not recommend a specific treatment for fatigue. To estimate the prognosis of individual patients, the TF advises using the modified Erasmus GBS outcome score (mEGOS) to assess outcome, and the modified Erasmus GBS Respiratory Insufficiency Score (mEGRIS) to assess the risk of requiring artificial ventilation. Based on the PICOs, available literature and additional discussions, we provide flow charts to assist making clinical decisions on diagnosis, treatment and the need for intensive care unit admission.

European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline on diagnosis and treatment of Guillain-Barré syndrome

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute polyradiculoneuropathy. Symptoms may vary greatly in presentation and severity. Besides weakness and sensory disturbances, patients may have cranial nerve involvement, respiratory insufficiency, autonomic dysfunction and pain. To develop an evidence-based guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of GBS, using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology, a Task Force (TF) of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) and the Peripheral Nerve Society (PNS) constructed 14 Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome questions (PICOs) covering diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of GBS, which guided the literature search. Data were extracted and summarised in GRADE Summaries of Findings (for treatment PICOs) or Evidence Tables (for diagnostic and prognostic PICOs). Statements were prepared according to GRADE Evidence-to-Decision (EtD) frameworks. For the six intervention PICOs, evidence-based recommendations are made. For other PICOs, good practice points (GPPs) are formulated. For diagnosis, the principal GPPs are: GBS is more likely if there is a history of recent diarrhoea or respiratory infection; CSF examination is valuable, particularly when the diagnosis is less certain; electrodiagnostic testing is advised to support the diagnosis; testing for anti-ganglioside antibodies is of limited clinical value in most patients with typical motor-sensory GBS, but anti-GQ1b antibody testing should be considered when Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS) is suspected; nodal-paranodal antibodies should be tested when autoimmune nodopathy is suspected; MRI or ultrasound imaging should be considered in atypical cases; and changing the diagnosis to acute-onset chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (A-CIDP) should be considered if progression continues after 8 weeks from onset, which occurs in around 5% of patients initially diagnosed with GBS. For treatment, the TF recommends intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) 0.4 g/kg for 5 days, in patients within 2 weeks (GPP also within 2-4 weeks) after onset of weakness if unable to walk unaided, or a course of plasma exchange (PE) 12-15 L in four to five exchanges over 1-2 weeks, in patients within 4 weeks after onset of weakness if unable to walk unaided. The TF recommends against a second IVIg course in GBS patients with a poor prognosis; recommends against using oral corticosteroids, and weakly recommends against using IV corticosteroids; does not recommend PE followed immediately by IVIg; weakly recommends gabapentinoids, tricyclic antidepressants or carbamazepine for treatment of pain; does not recommend a specific treatment for fatigue. To estimate the prognosis of individual patients, the TF advises using the modified Erasmus GBS outcome score (mEGOS) to assess outcome, and the modified Erasmus GBS Respiratory Insufficiency Score (mEGRIS) to assess the risk of requiring artificial ventilation. Based on the PICOs, available literature and additional discussions, we provide flow charts to assist making clinical decisions on diagnosis, treatment and the need for intensive care unit admission.

Dose-Effect Relationship of Motor Nerve Inexcitability on Outcome in Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Prospective Cohort Study

Objective

One or more inexcitable motor (IM) nerves are common during electrodiagnostic (EDx) study in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). This study assessed the dose-effect relationship of IM nerves on outcome in patients with acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP) and acute motor and/or sensory axonal neuropathy (AMAN and AMSAN).

Materials and Methods

Eighty-eight GBS patients admitted during May 2018-June 2023 underwent detailed clinical evaluation and EDx study. Admission and follow-up disability were assessed on a 0-10 Clinical Grading Scale (CGS). Outcome was recovery at 6 months, defined as good (CGS <3) and poor (CGS ≥3). Binary multivariate logistic regression with backward elimination was used to calculate independent predictors of outcome.

Results

Proportion of patients with complete recovery decreased significantly with increasing numbers of IM nerves (P < 0.01). Seventy-six patients were followed for 6 months. Among patients with IM nerves (n = 28), complete recovery was similar between AIDP and axonal GBS (70% vs. 50%, respectively; P = 0.40). However, in patients with recordable compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) in all the motor nerves (n = 26), axonal GBS had significantly poor recovery compared to AIDP (75% vs. 9.1%; P = 0.01). Among patients receiving intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg; n = 42), poor recovery was seen in 53.6% with IM nerves compared to 35.7% without (P = 0.28), while it was 37.5% versus 5.6% (P = 0.04), respectively, in those who did not receive IVIg (n = 34). However, only admission disability (odds ratio [OR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81-0.97; P = 0.007) was found to be an independent predictor of outcome.

Conclusion

Although increasing numbers of IM nerves were associated with poor outcome on univariate analysis, they did not predict 6 months' outcome independently. Outcome did not differ between axonal GBS and AIDP among those with IM nerves. IVIg improved outcome in patients with IM nerves.

Emerging biomarkers to predict clinical outcomes in Guillain-Barré syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an immune-mediated poly(radiculo)neuropathy with a variable clinical outcome. Identifying patients who are at risk of suffering from long-term disabilities is a great challenge. Biomarkers are useful to confirm diagnosis, monitor disease progression, and predict outcome.

AREAS COVERED

The authors provide an overview of the diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for GBS, which are useful for establishing early treatment strategies and follow-up care plans.

EXPERT OPINION

Detecting patients at risk of developing a severe outcome may improve management of disease progression and limit potential complications. Several clinical factors are associated with poor prognosis: higher age, presence of diarrhea within 4 weeks of symptom onset, rapid and severe weakness progression, dysautonomia, decreased vital capacity and facial, bulbar, and neck weakness. Biological, neurophysiological and imaging measures of unfavorable outcome include multiple anti-ganglioside antibodies elevation, increased serum and CSF neurofilaments light (NfL) and heavy chain, decreased NfL CSF/serum ratio, hypoalbuminemia, nerve conduction study with early signs of demyelination or axonal loss and enlargement of nerve cross-sectional area on ultrasound. Depicting prognostic biomarkers aims at predicting short-term mortality and need for cardio-pulmonary support, long-term patient functional outcome, guiding treatment decisions and monitoring therapeutic responses in future clinical trials.

Sympathetic skin response (SSR) in pediatric Guillain-Barré syndrome

Introduction

In the present study, sympathetic skin response (SSR) characteristics were explored in children with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and the value of early diagnosis and prognostic evaluation in GBS complicated by autonomic dysfunction (AD) was evaluated.

Methods

A total of 25 children with GBS and 30 healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled in this prospective study. SSR findings for the two groups were compared. SSR and nerve conduction study (NCS) results were compared among patients with GBS, and differences in clinical characteristics between the groups with abnormal and normal SSR were analyzed.

Results

Within the GBS group, six patients (24%) required mechanical ventilation, 17 patients (66.7%) had AD, 18 patients (72%) had an abnormal SSR, and 13 patients (52%) had AD combined with SSR abnormalities. There was a statistically significant difference in SSR latency in the lower limbs between the GBS group and HCs (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between SSR and NCS results in the acute phase of GBS (P > 0.05), and there was no significant difference in the rate of AD or in Hughes functional grade at nadir between the groups with abnormal and normal SSR (P>0.05). However, there was a statistically significant difference between the results of SSR and NCS tests during the recovery phase (P = 0.003). Abnormal SSR mainly occurred in cases of the acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (AIDP) subtype. In addition, SSR was abnormal in all pediatric GBS patients with poor prognosis 1 month after onset of symptoms.

Conclusion

Two-thirds of the children with GBS have AD. SSR could be used for early diagnosis and follow-up of GBS and may also be helpful in evaluating disease severity and short-term prognosis.

Clinical features of Guillain-Barré syndrome and factors associated with mortality during the 2019 outbreak in Peru

INTRODUCTION

Peru has suffered an increase of Guillain Barre Syndrome incidence since 2015, being the biggest outbreak during 2019. We aimed to describe the clinical features, outcomes, and factors associated with mortality among cases reported in the 2019 outbreak.

METHODS

Cross-sectional analysis of data from the National Surveillance of Guillain Barre Syndrome of the National Center for Control Disease and Prevention of Peru. We included all cases that met the Brighton criteria, level 1 to level 3. We used multivariable logistic regression to determinate factors associated with mortality.

RESULTS

Overall, 772 cases were analyzed (58.7% male; mean age, 41.7 ± 20.3). 86.0% of cases aged over 30 years. 71.4% had a respiratory or gastrointestinal infection in the last 4 weeks. Case fatality rate was 4.3% and 32.2% of survivors reported sequelae. Axonal subtypes were identified in 75.6% of cases with an available nerve conduction study (38.7%). Age and impaired function of cranial nerves were independently associated with mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2019 outbreak of Guillain Barre syndrome in Peru was an unprecedented event that affected several regions of the country. Axonal damage was more frequent than demyelinating involvement, which is compatible with findings pointing to Campylobacter jejuni as the triggering agent. The case fatality rate was similar to that reported previously in Peru and other countries, but the high frequency of sequelae is striking.

Atypical Guillain-Barre syndrome with T6 sensory level

Guillain-Barré syndrome is an acute immune-mediated demyelinating disease. Typical features include progressive ascending lower extremity weakness and areflexia. Several variants have been described that can make the diagnosis challenging. Here, we report a case of GBS presenting with progressive lower limb weakness and T6 sensory level.

Cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light chain predicts short-term prognosis in pediatric Guillain-Barré syndrome

Introduction

To study cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light chain (CSF-NfL) levels as a prognostic biomarker in pediatric Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS).

Methods

Prospective study enrolling 26 pediatric GBS patients and 48 healthy controls (HCs) from neurology units between 2017 to 2021. The CSF-NfL levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The children's disability levels were evaluated using Hughes Functional Score (HFS) at nadir, 1 month, and 6 months after onset. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve derived from logistic regression (with age as a covariate) was used to assess the prognostic value of CSF-NfL on the possibility of walking aided at 1 month after symptom onset.

Results

The mean CSF-NfL levels were significantly increased in GBS patients (111.76 pg/mL) as compared to that in HCs (76.82 pg/mL) (t = 6.754, p &lt; 0.001). At follow- up, the mean CSF-NfL levels after treatment (65.69 pg/mL) declined significantly (t = 6.693, p &lt; 0.001). CSF-NfL levels upon admission were significantly associated with the HFS at nadir (rs = 0.461, p = 0.018). Moreover, the mean CSF-NfL levels in GBS patients with poor prognosis (130.47pg/mL) were significantly higher than that in patients with good prognosis (104.87pg/mL) (t = 2.399, p = 0.025). ROC curve analysis of the predictive value of CSF-NfL levels with respect to the inability to walk unaided within 1 month showed a significant difference (area under the curve: 0.857,95% confidence interval 0.702-1.000; p = 0.006).

Conclusion

CSF-NfL levels were increased in pediatric GBS patients. High CSF-NfL level predicted worse motor function, and was strongly associated with poor short-term prognosis of pediatric GBS. We propose a biomarker for early prediction of outcome in pediatric GBS, which would be applicable for clinical practice and efficacy of treatment in the future.

Pragmatic guide to peripheral nerve disease and the role of clinical biomarkers

In clinical neurology practice, there are few sensitive, specific and responsive serological biomarkers reflecting pathological processes affecting the peripheral nervous system. Instead, we rely on surrogate multimodality biomarkers for diagnosis and management. Correct use and interpretation of the available tests is essential to ensure that appropriate treatments are used and adjusted in a timely fashion. The incorrect application or interpretation of biomarkers can result in misdiagnosis and delays in appropriate treatment. Here, we discuss the uses and limitations of such biomarkers and discuss possible future developments.

Association Between A-Waves and Outcome in Pediatric Guillain-Barré Syndrome

Introduction

To examine the importance of abundant A-waves in electrophysiological classification and prognosis of pediatric Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS).

Methods

A single-center and retrospective study enrolling 65 children-patients, aged 16 years and younger, with clinically diagnosed GBS between 2013 to 2020. Hughes grade was used to assess functional disability at nadir, 1 month, and 6 months after symptom onset. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence of abundant A-waves. Clinical features and prognosis between the 2 groups were compared.

Results

The distal motor latency of the median nerve in patients with GBS with A-waves (9.18 ms) was more prolonged than that of patients with GBS without A-waves (4.1 ms). An electrophysiological variant of these two groups was also statistically different (p = 0.006). The short-term prognosis of patients with AIDP with A-waves was worse than patients with AIDP without A-waves (χ² = 5.022, p = 0.025), and univariable logistic regression analysis showed statistically significant (OR: 5.844, 95% CI 1.118–30.553; p = 0.036).

Conclusion

A-waves were strongly associated with demyelination and poor short-term prognosis of AIDP in children. We proposed an electrophysiological marker for early prediction of outcome in the AIDP subtype of GBS, applicable for clinical practice and future treatment administration.