The role of AV and VV optimization for CRT

Feasibility of a Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Protocol for "off-on" Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a standard treatment for patients with heart failure and electrical dyssynchrony. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold standard for assessing left ventricular (LV) function. However, the feasibility of using CMR with active CRT is still uncertain.

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility of a CRT "off-on" protocol during CMR and measure the acute effects of CRT interruption on LV function.

METHODS

Patients underwent CMR before (pre-CRT) and 6 months after (post-CRT) an MR-conditional CRT defibrillator implantation. The post-CRT scan included two complete sets of cine images, one with inactive (post-CRTOFF) and one with active CRT (post-CRTON), maintaining a continuous connection between device and programmer.

RESULTS

Out of 29 enrolled patients, 8 (28%) had complete and analyzable post-CRT data. Unsuccessful procedures were attributed to connection problems between the CRT device and the programmer (n = 10), poor image quality (n = 7), and lack of patient cooperation (n = 4). LV ejection fraction significantly increased between pre-CRT scan (28.1%) and both post-CRTOFF (37.9%; p = 0.046) and post-CRTON CMR (35.0%; p = 0.037), with a nonstatistically significant trend toward decreased LV volumes. No adverse events or significant changes in device electrical parameters (including battery level) were detected during the post-CMR scan period.

CONCLUSION

A CRT "off-on" protocol during CMR studies can be safely executed in patients with an MR-conditional CRT defibrillator. However, technical improvements are needed to facilitate high-quality scans during active CRT. Favorable changes in LV function induced by CRT remodeling were not acutely reversed with the interruption of electrical therapy.

Factors that Determined a Positive Response to Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Cardiac Dyssynchrony. One Center Experience

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) associated with cardiac dyssynchrony and to identify the factors that influence the CRT efficacy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 155 patients after implantation of CRT devices. The CRT devices with a built-in cardioverter-defibrillator (CRT-D) and without it (CRT-P) were implanted in 139 (89.7%) and 16 (10.3%) patients, respectively. The follow-up period was 52.37±35.94 months. Based on the study results, two groups of patients were formed depending on the presence of a clinical response to CRT, responders and non-responders. The factors that influenced the clinical response to CRT were studied. The effect of the baseline state of patients on the effect of therapy was assessed. The need for CRT optimization and a possibility of using electrocardiographic criteria for that purpose were studied. Modern devices and leads for CRT, their functional capabilities and their influence on the CRT efficacy were characterized. Statistical analysis was performed with an IBM SPSS Statistics 21.0 (Chicago, USA) package.

RESULTS

CRT implantation with the left ventricular lead placement according to the traditional technique, through the coronary sinus, was successful in 130 (87.9%) patients. Difficulties with the left ventricular lead placement were noted in 13 (8.3%) patients when other techniques were used. After 6 months, a hemodynamic and clinical response was observed in 112 (72.2%) patients, and no positive response in 43 (27.8%). The increase in left ventricular ejection fraction in the responder group was more than 21.8±3.7%, which was associated with an improvement of the 6-minute walk test results. Th clinical response was significantly influenced by the possibility of stimulation from the basal parts of the heart; the use of more modern devices for CRT and quadripolar left ventricular leads; timely CRT optimization; and persistent dyssynchrony in non-responders. During the follow-up period, 34 (21.9%) patients died. The death rate in the non-responder group was significantly higher than in the responder group, 18 (41.3%) vs. 16 (14.3%), p=0.001. The main cause of death in the group of non-responders was CHF. Heart transplantation was performed in 3 (1.9%) patients.

CONCLUSION

CRT increases the life span and improves the quality of life in patients with CHF and cardiac dyssynchrony. There was a group of patients with no benefit from CRT in this study. Modern devices allow increasing the number of patients who benefit from CRT. Periodic optimization of CRT is necessary. When optimizing CRT, it is possible to use electrocardiographic criteria of effectiveness: duration of the QRS complex and changes in the position of the electrical axis of the heart.

Pilot study to evaluate left-to-right ventricular offset in biventricular pacing-comparison of electrocardiographic imaging and ECG

INTRODUCTION

Biventricular pacing (BiVp) improves outcomes in systolic heart failure patients with electrical dyssynchrony. BiVp is delivered from epicardial left ventricular (LV) and endocardial right ventricular (RV) electrodes. Acute electrical activation changes with different LV-RV stimulation offsets can help guide individually optimized BiVp programming. We sought to study the BiVp ventricular activation with different LV-RV offsets and compare with 12-lead ECG.

METHODS

In five patients with BiVp (63 ± 17-year-old, 80% male, LV ejection fraction 27 ± 6%), we evaluated acute ventricular epicardial activation, varying LV-RV offsets in 20 ms increments from -40 to 80 ms, using electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) to obtain absolute ventricular electrical uncoupling (VEUabs, absolute difference in average LV and average RV activation time) and total activation time (TAT). For each patient, we calculated the correlation between ECGI and corresponding ECG (3D-QRS-area and QRS duration) with different LV-RV offsets.

RESULTS

The LV-RV offset to attain minimum VEUabs in individual patients ranged 20-60 ms. In all patients, a larger LV-RV offset was required to achieve minimum VEUabs (36 ± 17 ms) or 3D-QRS-area (40 ± 14 ms) than that for minimum TAT (-4 ± 9 ms) or QRS duration (-8 ± 11 ms). In individual patients, 3D-QRS-area correlated with VEUabs (r 0.65 ± 0.24) and QRS duration correlated with TAT (r 0.95 ± 0.02). Minimum VEUabs and minimum 3D-QRS-area were obtained by LV-RV offset within 20 ms of each other in all five patients.

CONCLUSIONS

LV-RV electrical uncoupling, as assessed by ECGI, can be minimized by optimizing LV-RV stimulation offset. 3D-QRS-area is a surrogate to identify LV-RV offset that minimizes LV-RV uncoupling.

Variation in optimal hemodynamic atrio-ventricular delay of biventricular pacing with different endocardial left ventricular lead locations using precision hemodynamics

INTRODUCTION

It is not known whether the optimal atrioventricular (AVopt ) delay varies between left ventricular (LV) pacing site during endocardial biventricular pacing (BiVP) and may therefore needs consideration.

METHODS

We assessed the hemodynamic AVopt in patients with chronic heart failure undergoing endocardial LV lead implantation. AVopt was assessed during atrio-BiVP with a "roving LV lead." Up to four locations were studied: mid-lateral wall, mid-septum (or a close alternative), site of greatest hemodynamic improvement, and LV lead implant site. The AVopt was compared to a fixed AV delay of 180 ms.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were included (12 male, aged 66.5 ± 12.8 years, ejection fraction 26 ± 7%, 16 left bundle branch block or high percentage of right ventricular pacing [RVP], QRS duration 167 ± 27 ms). In most locations (62/63), AVopt increased systolic blood pressure during BiVP compared with RVP (relative improvement 6 mmHg, interquartile range [IQR] 4-9 mmHg). Compared to a fixed AV delay, the hemodynamic improvement at AVopt was higher (1 mmHg, IQR 0.2-2.6 mmHg, p < .001). Within most patients (16/17), we observed a difference in AVopt between pacing sites (median paced AVopt 209 ms, IQR 117-250). Within this range, the hemodynamic impact of these differences was small (median loss 0.6 mmHg, IQR 0.1-2.6 mmHg).

CONCLUSION

Within a patient, different endocardial LV lead locations have slightly different hemodynamic AVopt which are superior to a fixed AV delay. The hemodynamic consequence of applying an optimum from a different lead location is small.

Pacing interventions in non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy

Non-responders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) represent a high-risk, and difficult to treat population of heart failure patients. Studies have shown that these patients have a lower quality of life and reduced life expectancy compared to those who respond to CRT. Whilst the first-line treatment for dyssynchronous heart failure is "conventional" biventricular epicardial CRT, a range of novel pacing interventions have emerged as potential alternatives. This has raised the question whether these new treatments may be useful as a second-line pacing intervention for treating non-responders, or indeed, whether some patients may benefit from these as a first-line option. In this review, we will examine the current evidence for four pacing interventions in the context of treatment of conventional CRT non-responders: CRT optimization; multisite left ventricular pacing; left ventricular endocardial pacing and conduction system pacing.

The Interplay of PR Interval and AV Pacing Delays Used for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure Patients: Association with Clinical Response in a Retrospective Analysis of a Large Observational Study

Background. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a treatment for heart failure (HF) patients with prolonged QRS and impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function. We aim to evaluate how the baseline PR interval is associated with outcomes (all-cause death or HF hospitalizations) and LV reverse remodeling (>15% relative reduction in LV end-systolic volume). Methods. Among 2224 patients with CRT defibrillators, 1718 (77.2%) had a device programmed at out-of-the-box settings (sensed AV delay: 100 ms and paced AV delay: 130 ms). Results. In this cohort of 1718 patients (78.7% men, mean age 66 years, 71.6% in NYHA class III/IV, LVEF = 27 ± 6%), echocardiographic assessment at 6-month follow-up showed that LV reverse remodeling was not constant as a function of the PR interval; in detail, it occurred in 56.4% of all patients but was more frequent (76.6%) in patients with a PR interval of 160 ms. In a median follow-up of 20 months, the endpoint of death or HF hospitalizations occurred in 304/1718 (17.7%) patients; in the multivariable regression analysis it was significantly less frequent when the PR interval was between 150 and 170 ms (hazard ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.63−0.99, p = 0.046). The same PR range was associated with higher probability of CRT response (odds ratio = 2.51, 95% CI: 1.41−4.47, p = 0.002). Conclusions. In a large population of CRT patients, with fixed AV pacing delays, specific PR intervals are associated with significant benefits in terms of LV reverse remodeling and lower morbidity. These observational data suggest the importance of optimizing pacing programming as a function of the PR interval to maximize CRT response and patient outcome.

Computational electrophysiology of the coronary sinus branches based on electro-anatomical mapping for the prediction of the latest activated region

This work dealt with the assessment of a computational tool to estimate the electrical activation in the left ventricle focusing on the latest electrically activated segment (LEAS) in patients with left bundle branch block and possible myocardial fibrosis. We considered the Eikonal-diffusion equation and to recover the electrical activation maps in the myocardium. The model was calibrated by using activation times acquired in the coronary sinus (CS) branches or in the CS solely with an electroanatomic mapping system (EAMS) during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We applied our computational tool to ten patients founding an excellent accordance with EAMS measures; in particular, the error for LEAS location was less than 4 mm. We also calibrated our model using only information in the CS, still obtaining an excellent agreement with the measured LEAS. The proposed tool was able to accurately reproduce the electrical activation maps and in particular LEAS location in the CS branches, with an almost real-time computational effort, regardless of the presence of myocardial fibrosis, even when information only at CS was used to calibrate the model. This could be useful in the clinical practice since LEAS is often used as a target site for the left lead placement during CRT.

Meshless Electrophysiological Modeling of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy—Benchmark Analysis with Finite-Element Methods in Experimental Data

Computational models of cardiac electrophysiology are promising tools for reducing the rates of non-response patients suitable for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) by optimizing electrode placement. The majority of computational models in the literature are mesh-based, primarily using the finite element method (FEM). The generation of patient-specific cardiac meshes has traditionally been a tedious task requiring manual intervention and hindering the modeling of a large number of cases. Meshless models can be a valid alternative due to their mesh quality independence. The organization of challenges such as the CRT-EPiggy19, providing unique experimental data as open access, enables benchmarking analysis of different cardiac computational modeling solutions with quantitative metrics. We present a benchmark analysis of a meshless-based method with finite-element methods for the prediction of cardiac electrical patterns in CRT, based on a subset of the CRT-EPiggy19 dataset. A data assimilation strategy was designed to personalize the most relevant parameters of the electrophysiological simulations and identify the optimal CRT lead configuration. The simulation results obtained with the meshless model were equivalent to FEM, with the most relevant aspect for accurate CRT predictions being the parameter personalization strategy (e.g., regional conduction velocity distribution, including the Purkinje system and CRT lead distribution).

ECG optimisation for CRT systems in the era of automatic algorithms: a comprehensive review

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) may fail in up to one third of patients, mainly due to anatomical and procedural issues. In the daily practice, ECG optimisation is largely used to address CRT delivery. Ineffective CRT can be related to non-optimal pacing timing as well as inadequate pacing-capture. A rate-competitive atrial fibrillation (AF) or a high daily burden of premature ventricular contractions (PVC) may also affect CRT by means of fusion or pseudo-fusion captures. Growing observations suggest that in a subset of patients with typical left bundle branch block (LBBB), selected LV pacing may be more effective, producing a complete fusion between the left pacing and the intrinsic right bundle activation. The His-ventricular (HV) interval is an invasive measurement (derived from electrophysiological study), which mainly reflects the RV activation (and its contribution to QRS timing) and has been proposed by some authors when addressing LV-paced–RV-sensed fusion. In sinus rhythm CRT patients, with baseline typical LBBB criteria and preserved AV conduction, the “dromotropic” management to achieve RV intrinsic activation with LV fusion is also “AV delay dependent”. In this regard, the RV intrinsic activation (detected by RV sensing) and the A (paced/sensed)-RV (sensed) interval are also influenced by the RV lead position within the RV. The current families of CRT devices have implemented automatic algorithms to optimise AV and VV timing intervals. The proof of principle is again the evidence that fusion of an LV-paced beat with intrinsic rhythm may be more beneficial than standard biventricular pacing, provided a preserved AV conduction. In the present review, all the above issues are discussed.

Paced or sensed conduction time to determine programming with cardiac resynchronization therapy: The PASED-CRT Trial

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a well-established treatment for patients with drug refractory heart failure.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare the longest RV_sense to LV_sense activation time (sLAT) versus the longest RV_pace to LV_sense activation time (pLAT) as the programmed site for left ventricular (LV) pacing in CRT patients with quadripolar LV leads at 3 months.

METHODS

This single site, double-blinded, prospective trial, randomized patients 1:1 into the sLAT or pLAT group to determine response. LV pacing was programmed at implant and maintained through 3 months of follow-up. The 6-minute hall walk (6MHW) test, NYHA, Minnesota living with heart failure, and clinical composite score (CCS) at the 3 months was compared.

RESULTS

N = 92 patients (73M:19F age 66 ± 11.3 years) were randomized implanted and programmed per protocol. Baseline characteristics were comparable. N = 39 sLAT and N = 34 pLAT completed the 3-month visit for final analysis. Significant improvement from baseline to 3 months was seen in the sLAT group from 253.9 (+/-11.5) to 323.1 (+/-11.9) P = .001. Similarly, the pLAT group improved from 274.9 (+/-16.15) to 343.9 (+/-15.9) P = .003. The difference between these groups, however, did not reach significance (P = .86). The pLAT group demonstrated a higher responder rate of (71%) versus the sLAT group (64%) based on the CCS although not reaching significance (P = .56).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of both the pLAT and sLAT method of programming demonstrated significant improvement in 6MHW distance at 3 months with pLAT demonstrating a slightly higher responder rate based on CCS (P = .56). pLAT should be considered at minimum as equivalent in patients with no intrinsic conduction.

Electrical Reverse Remodeling of the Native Cardiac Conduction System after Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Background: Little is known about electrical remodeling of the native conduction systems, particularly how the PR interval changes, after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We investigated the effects of CRT on the intrinsic PR interval (i-PRi) and QRS duration (i-QRSd). Methods and results: In 100 consecutive CRT recipients with sinus rhythm and long-term follow-up (>1 year), the i-PRi and i-QRSd were measured at baseline and at the last echocardiographic follow-up (33.4 ± 17.9 months) with biventricular pacing temporarily withdrawn. The relative decrease in the left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) was measured to define CRT-responders (≥15%) and super-responders (≥30%). Following CRT, the left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction increased significantly (p < 0.001). In CRT-responders (n = 71), the LVESV and i-QRSd decreased markedly (170 ± 39 to 159 ± 24 ms, p = 0.012). However, the i-PRi was not shortened with CRT response and was actually likely to increase, even in the super-responder group (n = 33). Moreover, lengthening of the i-PRi was observed consistently irrespective of the CRT response status, beta-blocker use, or amiodarone use. CRT non-responders were associated with a remarkable PR prolongation (p = 0.005) and QRS widening (p = 0.001), along with positive ventricular remodeling. Conclusion: LV volume and i-QRSd decreased markedly with CRT response. However, the i-PRi was not shortened, but rather increased regardless of the degree of CRT response. CRT non-response was associated with a considerable increase in the i-PRi and i-QRSd, along with positive ventricular remodeling. CRT-induced electrical reverse remodeling might occur preferentially in the intraventricular, but not the atrioventricular, conduction system.

Cardiac resynchronization and implantable defibrillators in adults with congenital heart disease

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are well-established therapies for adult patients with heart failure that have been shown to improve morbidity and mortality. However, the benefits and indications for use in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) are less defined with no significant large prospective studies in this population. There are, however, multiple retrospective studies that demonstrate the efficacy of these devices in the ACHD population. These indicate a role for both CRT and ICDs in select patients with ACHD. The clinician and patient must balance the risks and benefits, summarized in complex evidence that reflects the heterogeneity of the ACHD patient group, and apply them in a patient-specific manner to optimize the utility of CRT and ICDs.

Long-term performance of an atrial lead capable of accelerometer based detection of cardiac contractility in patients receiving cardiac resynchronisation therapy

Objectives

To evaluate the long-term performance of the SonRtip atrial lead.

Background

To optimize atrioventricular and interventricular timing and thereby potentially improving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) responder rates, a lead integrated technology and a cardioverter/defibrillator-based algorithm measuring peak endocardial acceleration have been introduced. Long-term performance of the atrial lead (SonRtip PS55D, Sorin/MicroPort CRM, Italy) embedded with such a sensor has not been reported so far.

Methods

Between 2012 and 2018, 143 patients underwent implantation of the SonRtip atrial lead in four Austrian medical centers. Conventional bipolar atrial leads implanted during the same period in 526 patients receiving CRT were used as control cohort.

Results

Among 669 patients included in the study, 10 (1.5%) showed increased atrial pacing thresholds and/or decreased atrial sensing amplitudes and/or sudden increase in atrial lead impedance (above 3000 Ω) after an uneventful early postoperative period. Seven (70%) of the malfunctioning leads were SonRtip leads (p <0.001). Lead replacement was needed in 4.2% of SonRtip leads (six out of 143) and in 0.38% of all other conventional atrial leads (two out of 526) (p <0.001). Because of unaltered atrial sensing properties, a wait and see strategy was chosen in two patients–one of them with a SonRtip lead. The implanted atrial lead in the latter person experienced a sudden increase in pacing threshold (4V/0.35ms).

Conclusions

While short-term safety and stable technical performance of the SonRtip atrial lead could be confirmed, our study found an unexpectedly high malfunction rate over a longer follow-up period.

Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Automated Dynamic Optimization and Left Ventricular-only Pacing

BACKGROUND

Although device-based optimization has been developed to overcome the limitations of conventional optimization methods in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), few real-world data supports the results of clinical trials that showed the efficacy of automatic optimization algorithms. We investigated whether CRT using the adaptive CRT algorithm is comparable to non-adaptive biventricular (BiV) pacing optimized with electrocardiogram or echocardiography-based methods.

METHODS

Consecutive 155 CRT patients were categorized into 3 groups according to the optimization methods: non-adaptive BiV (n = 129), adaptive BiV (n = 11), and adaptive left ventricular (LV) pacing (n = 15) groups. Additionally, a subgroup of patients (n = 59) with normal PR interval and left bundle branch block (LBBB) was selected from the non-adaptive BiV group. The primary outcomes included cardiac death, heart transplantation, LV assist device implantation, and heart failure admission. Secondary outcomes were electromechanical reverse remodeling and responder rates at 6 months after CRT.

RESULTS

During a median 27.5-month follow-up, there was no significant difference in primary outcomes among the 3 groups. However, there was a trend toward better outcomes in the adaptive LV group compared to the other groups. In a more rigorous comparisons among the patients with normal PR interval and LBBB, similar patterns were still observed.

CONCLUSION

In our first Asian-Pacific real-world data, automated dynamic CRT optimization showed comparable efficacy to conventional methods regarding clinical outcomes and electromechanical remodeling.

Non-response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment option for therapy-refractory mild to severe heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction and left ventricular (LV) conduction delay. Multiple clinical trials have shown that CRT improves cardiac function and overall quality of life, as well as reduces HF hospitalizations, health care costs, and mortality.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite its effectiveness, the "non-response" rate to CRT is around 30%, remaining a major challenge that faces electrophysiologists and researchers. It has been recently suggested that the etiology of CRT non-response is multifactorial, and it requires a multifaceted approach to address it. In this focused review, we will summarize the definitions of CRT non-response, identify key factors for CRT non-response, and offer a simplified framework to address CRT non-response with the main goal of improving CRT outcomes.

Electrocardiographic optimization techniques in resynchronization therapy

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a cornerstone of therapy for patients with heart failure, reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, and a wide QRS complex. However, not all patients respond to CRT: 30% of CRT implanted patients are currently considered clinical non-responders and up to 40% do not achieve LV reverse remodelling. In order to achieve the best CRT response, appropriate patient selection, device implantation, and programming are important factors. Optimization of CRT pacing intervals may improve results, increasing the number of responders, and the magnitude of the response. Echocardiography is considered the reference method for atrioventricular and interventricular (VV) intervals optimization but it is time-consuming, complex and it has a large interobserver and intraobserver variability. Previous studies have linked QRS shortening to clinical response, echocardiographic improvement and favourable prognosis. In this review, we describe the electrocardiographic optimization methods available: 12-lead electrocardiogram; fusion-optimized intervals (FOI); intracardiac electrogram-based algorithms; and electrocardiographic imaging. Fusion-optimized intervals is an electrocardiographic method of optimizing CRT based on QRS duration that combines fusion with intrinsic conduction. The FOI method is feasible and fast, further reduces QRS duration, can be performed during implant, improves acute haemodynamic response, and achieves greater LV remodelling compared with nominal programming of CRT.

Optimization of CRT programming using non-invasive electrocardiographic imaging to assess the acute electrical effects of multipoint pacing

AIM

Quadripolar lead technology and multi-point pacing (MPP) are important clinical adjuncts in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) pacing aimed at reducing the rate of non-response to therapy. Mixed results have been achieved using MPP and it is critical to identify which patients require this approach and how to configure their MPP stimulation, in order to achieve optimal electrical resynchronization.

METHODS & RESULTS

We sought to investigate whether electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi), using the CARDIOINSIGHT ™ inverse ECG mapping system, could identify alterations in electrical resynchronization during different methods of device optimization. In no patient did a single form of programming optimization provide the best electrical response. The effects of utilizing MPP were idiosyncratic and highly patient specific. ECGi activation maps were clearly able to discern changes in bulk LV activation during differing MPP programming. In two of the five subjects, MPP resulted in more rapid activation of the left ventricle compared to standard CRT; however, in the remaining three patients, the use of MPP did not appear to acutely improve electrical resynchronization. Crucially, this cohort showed evidence of extensive LV scarring which was well visualized using both CMR and ECGi voltage mapping.

CONCLUSIONS

Our work suggests a potential role for ECGi in the optimization of non-responders to CRT, as it allows the fusion of activation maps and scar analysis above and beyond interrogation of the 12 lead ECG.

Comparison of Echocardiographic and Electrocardiographic Mapping for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Optimisation

Study hypothesis

We sought to investigate the association between echocardiographic optimisation and ventricular activation time in cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) patients, obtained through the use of electrocardiographic mapping (ECM). We hypothesised that echocardiographic optimisation of the pacing delay between the atrial and ventricular leads-atrioventricular delay (AVD)-and the delay between ventricular leads-interventricular pacing interval (VVD)-would correlate with reductions in ventricular activation time.

Background

Optimisation of AVD and VVD may improve CRT patient outcome. Optimal delays are currently set based on echocardiographic indices; however, acute studies have found that reductions in bulk ventricular activation time correlate with improvements in acute haemodynamic performance.

Materials and methods

Twenty-one patients with established CRT criteria were recruited. After implantation, patients underwent echo-guided optimisation of the AVD and VVD. During this procedure, the participants also underwent noninvasive ECM. ECM maps were constructed for each AVD and VVD. ECM maps were analysed offline. Total ventricular activation time (TVaT) and a ventricular activation time index (VaT_10-90) were calculated to identify the optimal AVD and VVD timings that gave the minimal TVaT and VaT_10-90 values. We correlated cardiac output with these electrical timings.

Results

Echocardiographic programming optimisation was not associated with the greatest reductions in biventricular activation time (VaT_10-90 and TVaT). Instead, bulk activation times were reduced by a further 20% when optimised with ECM. A significant inverse correlation was identified between reductions in bulk ventricular activation time and improvements in LVOT VTI (p < 0.001), suggesting that improved ventricular haemodynamics are a sequelae of more rapid ventricular activation.

Conclusions

EAM-guided programming optimisation may achieve superior fusion of activation wave fronts leading to improvements in CRT response.

Understanding non-response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy: common problems and potential solutions

Heart failure is a complex clinical syndrome associated with a significant morbidity and mortality burden. Reductions in left ventricular (LV) function trigger adaptive mechanisms, leading to structural changes within the LV and the potential development of dyssynchronous ventricular activation. This is the substrate targeted during cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT); however, around 30-50% of patients do not experience benefit from this treatment. Non-response occurs as a result of pre-implant, peri-implant and post implant factors but the technical constraints of traditional, transvenous epicardial CRT mean they can be challenging to overcome. In an effort to improve response, novel alternative methods of CRT delivery have been developed and of these endocardial pacing, where the LV is stimulated from inside the LV cavity, appears the most promising.

Variation in activation time during bipolar vs extended bipolar left ventricular pacing

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is typically delivered via quadripolar leads that allow stimulation using either true bipolar pacing, where stimulation occurs between two electrodes (BP) on the quadripolar lead, or extended bipole (EBP) left ventricular (LV) pacing, with the quadripolar electrodes and right ventricular coil acting as the cathode and anode, respectively. True bipolar pacing is associated with reductions in mortality and it has been postulated that these differences are the result of enhanced electrical activation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing a CRT underwent an electrocardiographic imaging study where electrical activation data were recorded while different LV pacing vectors were temporarily programmed.

RESULTS

There were no differences in the total electrical activation times or dispersion of electrical activation between biventricular pacing with bipolar or corresponding EBP LV vector configurations (left ventricular total activation time [LVtat] BP 74.70 ± 18.07 vs EBP 72.4 ± 22.64; P = 0.45). When dichotomized according to etiology, no difference was observed in the activation time with either BP or EBP pacing (LVtat BP ischemic cardiomyopathy 72.2 ± 17.4 vs BP dilated cardiomyopathy 79.9 ± 18.9; P = 0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

Bipolar pacing alters the mechanical activation sequence of the LV and is associated with reductions in all-cause mortality. It has been postulated these benefits derive from improvements in electromechanical activation of the LV. Our study would suggest that true bipolar pacing does not necessarily result in more favorable activation of the LV or improved electrical resynchronization and other mechanisms should be explored.

Adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy for dilated cardiomyopathy with functional mitral regurgitation

We report the case of a man in his 60s who had dilated cardiomyopathy with severe functional mitral regurgitation. Four years after a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator was implanted, this device was replaced with an adaptive CRT device because of battery consumption. Seven months after replacement of this device, the left ventricular pacing to right ventricular activation and the atrioventricular delay from automatic adjustments contributed to less functional mitral regurgitation. The findings from our case suggest that optimal CRT, by measuring intracardiac conduction parameters, is effective for functional mitral regurgitation.

Echocardiographic, Electrocardiographic Changes and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Who Respond to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy after One Year

Background

Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is commonly assessed after 6 or 12 months. We evaluated subsequent echocardiographic changes, serial QRS duration, and clinical outcomes in patients showing delayed responses to CRT after 12 months.

Methods

Among all patients who received CRT in Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, 36 one-year survivors were enrolled. Indicators of a positive CRT response were ≥ 15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) or ≥ 10% increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on any follow up echocardiogram. We defined the early responders as patients responding before one year, the late responders as patients responding after one year, and the non-responders as patients who did not respond on any follow-up echocardiogram.

Results

We identified 17 early responders, 10 late responders, and 9 non-responders. The late responders showed modest improvement in LVESV and LVEF at two years after CRT. QRS duration was shortened the day after CRT in all three groups. Narrowed QRS was maintained for two years in early and late responders, whereas it was continuously prolonged over time in non-responders. Incidence of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization was comparable between early and late responders, while non-responders showed worst prognosis.

Conclusion

Patients responding to CRT after one year show modest echocardiographic improvement but clinical outcome is similar to early responders. Shorter baseline QRS duration and long-term maintenance of QRS duration shortening are important features of the late responders to CRT.

Automatic Mode Switch (AMS) Causes Less Synchronization

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac resynchronization devices are part of modern heart failure management. After implantation, we analyze and program devices in an attempt to ensure their success. Biventricular pacing should be 98% or more for the lowest mortality and best symptom improvement.

CASE PRESENTATION

In this case series, we present a combination of far field sensing and automatic mode switching (AMS) in six patients. It is found that this combination causes ventricular sensing (VS) episodes with wide QRS and no synchronization. We turn off the AMS and alleviate the problem.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching AMS off may increase biventricular pacing in some patients.