Osteoarthritis and the rule of halves

Variation in appropriate diabetes care and treatment targets in urban and rural areas in England: an observational study of the 'rule of halves'

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the 'rule of halves' for diabetes care for urban and rural areas in England using several data sources covering the period 2015-2017; and to examine the extent to which any differences in urban and rural settings are explained by population characteristics and the workforce supply of primary care providers (general practices).

DESIGN

A retrospective observational study.

SETTING

Populations resident in predominantly urban and rural areas in England (2015-2017).

PARTICIPANTS

N=33 336 respondents to the UK Household Longitudinal Survey in urban and rural settings in England; N=4913 general practices in England reporting to the National Diabetes Audit and providing workforce data to NHS Digital.

OUTCOMES

Diabetes prevalence; administrative records of diagnoses of diabetes; provision of (all eight) recommended diabetes care processes; diabetes treatment targets.

RESULTS

Diabetes prevalence was higher in urban areas in England (7.80% (95% CI 7.30% to 8.31%)) relative to rural areas (7.24% (95% CI 6.32% to 8.16%)). For practices in urban areas, relatively fewer cases of diabetes were recorded in administrative medical records (69.55% vs 71.86%), and a smaller percentage of those registered received the appropriate care (45.85% vs 49.32%). Among estimated prevalent cases of diabetes, urban areas have a 24.84% achieving these targets compared with 25.16% in rural areas. However, adjusted analyses showed that the performance of practices in urban areas in providing appropriate care quality was not significantly different from practices in rural areas.

CONCLUSIONS

The 'rule of halves' is not an accurate description of the actual pattern across the diabetes care pathway in England. More than half of the estimated urban and rural diabetes population are registered with clinical practices and have access to treatment. However, less than half of those registered for treatment have achieved treatment targets. Appropriate care quality was associated with a greater proportion of patients with diabetes achieving treatment targets.

The effects on pain and quality of life of traditional Chinese manual therapy for knee osteoarthritis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a common disease with the high occurrence in the world. The symptoms of pain and dysfunction decrease quality of life in KOA patients. Several studies reported traditional Chinese manual therapy showed beneficial effects in improving pain and dysfunction of patient with KOA, but most previous reviews did not focus on the effects on quality life of traditional Chinese manual therapy for KOA. However, better quality of life is important for patients suffering KOA. Therefore, the current review and meta-analysis will be conducted to assess the effects on clinical symptoms and quality of life of traditional Chinese manual therapy for KOA.

METHODS

Eight electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, and Chinese Scientific Journal Database will be searched from the beginning to December 2021. Two reviewers will independently select included studies and extract data. Heterogeneity will be evaluated by I2 statistic before the data synthesis. Subgroup analysis will be performed by duration of KOA, different types of traditional Chinese manual therapy, different outcomes, and different intervention time. The primary outcome is quality of life in KOA patients, and the secondary outcomes include pain and dysfunction due to KOA. Rev Man 5.3 software will be used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The results of this review will be reported in a peer-reviewed journal.

CONCLUSION

The results of this review will provide reliable evidence for the effects on quality of life and clinical symptoms of traditional Chinese manual therapy for KOA.

INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER

INPLASY2021120043.

Massage Therapy and Quality of Life in Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Qualitative Study

Objective

We hypothesized that participants receiving Swedish massage would experience benefits such as stress reduction and enhanced quality of life, in addition to the osteoarthritis-specific effects assessed in a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Design

Qualitative methods were used to explore a deeper contextual understanding of participants' experiences with massage and osteoarthritis, in addition to the quantitative data collected from primary and secondary outcome measures of the dose-finding study.

Setting

Two community hospitals affiliated with academic health centers in Connecticut and New Jersey.

Subjects

Eighteen adults who previously participated in a dose-finding clinical trial of massage therapy for osteoarthritis of the knee.

Methods

Face-to-face and telephone interviews using a standardized interview guide. Triangulation of qualitative and quantitative data allowed for a more thorough understanding of the effects of massage therapy.

Results

Three salient themes emerged from our analysis. Participants discussed 1) relaxation effects, 2) improved quality of life associated with receiving massage therapy, and 3) the accessibility of massage therapy in treating osteoarthritis.

Conclusions

Participant responses noted empowerment with an improved ability to perform activities of daily living after experiencing massage therapy. The majority of statements were consistent with their quantitative changes on standard osteoarthritis measures. Future research in pain conditions should include health-related quality of life assessments as well as outcomes related to perceived well-being, along with greater exploration of the concept of salutogenic side effects of an intervention in the context of complementary and integrative therapies.

Self-management of musculoskeletal hand pain and hand problems in community-dwelling adults aged 50 years and older: results from a cross-sectional study in a UK population

BACKGROUND

Musculoskeletal pain is common in adults, with the hand being frequently affected. Healthcare services have the potential to be of benefit to adults with hand pain and problems, through promotion and facilitation of self-management.

METHODS

This paper explores existing self-management in a UK population of community-dwelling adults aged 50 years and over using data from surveys and a nested clinical cohort study. Self-management of hand problems was considered in three ways: self-directed treatment approaches used, adaptation behaviours adopted and choice to consult with a healthcare professional.

RESULTS

The treatment approaches most commonly used were 'exercise/movement' (n = 151, 69 %) and 'resting' the hands (n = 139, 69 %). The use of adaptation behaviour was widespread: 217 (99 %) people reported using one or more adaptation behaviours. Under half of survey respondents who reported hand pain (n = 783, 43 %) had consulted a healthcare professional about their problem during the last year: the lowest rate of consultation was for occupational therapy (n = 60, 3 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Self-directed treatment and adaptation behaviours were widespread in adults aged 50 years and over with hand problems, but consultation with a healthcare professional was low.

The relative importance of perceived doctor's attitude on the decision to consult for symptomatic osteoarthritis: a choice-based conjoint analysis study

OBJECTIVES

Some patients spend years with painful osteoarthritis without consulting for it, including times when they are experiencing persistent severe pain and disability. Beliefs about osteoarthritis and what primary care has to offer may influence the decision to consult but their relative importance has seldom been quantified. We sought to investigate the relative importance of perceived service-related and clinical need attributes in the decision to consult a primary care physician for painful osteoarthritis.

DESIGN

Partial-profile choice-based conjoint analysis study, using a self-complete questionnaire containing 10 choice tasks, each presenting two scenarios based on a combination of three out of six selected attributes.

SETTING

General population.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults aged 50 years and over with hip, knee or hand pain registered with four UK general practices.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Relative importance of pain characteristics, level of disruption to everyday life, extent of comorbidity, assessment, management, perceived general practitioner (GP) attitude.

RESULTS

863 (74%) people responded (55% female; mean age 70 years, range: 58-93). The most important determinants of the patient's decision to consult the GP for joint pain were the extent to which pain disrupted everyday life ('most' vs 'none': relative importance 31%) and perceived GP attitude ('legitimate problem, requires treatment' vs 'part of the normal ageing process that one just has to accept': 24%). Thoroughness of assessment (14%), management options offered (13%), comorbidity (13%) and pain characteristics (5%) were less strongly associated with the decision to consult.

CONCLUSIONS

Anticipating that the GP will regard joint pain as 'part of the normal ageing process that one just has to accept' is a strong disincentive to seeking help, potentially outweighing other aspects of quality of care. Alongside the recognition and management of disrupted function, an important goal of each primary care consultation for osteoarthritis should be to avoid imparting or reinforcing this perception.