Hearing preservation after stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: A systematic review

Long-Term Hearing Outcome For Vestibular Schwannomas After Microsurgery And Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Hearing loss is a common symptom associated with vestibular schwannoma (VS), either because of the tumor's effects on the cochlear nerve or due to active treatments such as surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Treatment decisions for VS are based on factors including tumor size, hearing status, patient symptoms, and institutional preference. The study aimed to investigate long-term auditory outcomes in VS patients undergoing active treatments with a hearing preservation intent.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic literature review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, searching Scopus, Pubmed, and Web of Science databases from inception to January 2024.

REVIEW METHODS

Studies meeting inclusion criteria, including a minimum 5-year follow-up and assessment of pre- and posttreatment hearing outcomes, were included. Pooled prevalence estimates for serviceable hearing after SRS and microsurgery were calculated using MetaXL software. Risk of bias assessment was performed with the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool.

RESULTS

Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, with 356 patients included for analysis. The pooled prevalence of maintaining serviceable hearing after SRS at 10 years was 18.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7%-43.3%), with wide prediction intervals indicating variability in outcomes. Microsurgery demonstrated a higher prevalence of maintaining long-term serviceable hearing, with a pooled estimate of 74.5% (95% CI: 63.5%-84.1%).

CONCLUSION

This systematic review underscores the importance of long-term follow-up in evaluating auditory outcomes in VS treatment. Despite the biases inherent to pretreatment patients selection, hearing preservation microsurgery for sporadic VS removal demonstrated favorable and stable long-term serviceable hearing.

Clinical practice guideline on the management of vestibular schwannoma

INTRODUCTION

Vestibular schwannoma (VS) is the most common tumour of the cerebellopontine angle. The greater accessibility to radiological tests has increased its diagnosis. Taking into account the characteristics of the tumour, the symptoms and the age of the patient, three therapeutic strategies have been proposed: observation, surgery or radiotherapy. Choosing the most appropriate for each patient is a frequent source of controversy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This paper includes an exhaustive literature review of issues related to VS that can serve as a clinical guide in the management of patients with these lesions. The presentation has been oriented in the form of questions that the clinician usually asks himself and the answers have been written and/or reviewed by a panel of national and international experts consulted by the Otology Commission of the SEORL-CCC.

RESULTS

A list has been compiled containing the 13 most controversial thematic blocks on the management of VS in the form of 50 questions, and answers to all of them have been sought through a systematic literature review (articles published on PubMed and Cochrane Library between 1992 and 2023 related to each thematic area). Thirty-three experts, led by the Otology Committee of SEORL-CCC, have analyzed and discussed all the answers. In Annex 1, 14 additional questions divided into 4 thematic areas can be found.

CONCLUSIONS

This clinical practice guideline on the management of VS offers agreed answers to the most common questions that are asked about this tumour. The absence of sufficient prospective studies means that the levels of evidence on the subject are generally medium or low. This fact increases the interest of this type of clinical practice guidelines prepared by experts.

Brazilian Society of Otology task force - Vestibular Schwannoma ‒ evaluation and treatment

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature on the diagnosis and treatment of vestibular schwannoma.

METHODS

Task force members were educated on knowledge synthesis methods, including electronic database search, review and selection of relevant citations, and critical appraisal of selected studies. Articles written in English or Portuguese on vestibular schwannoma were eligible for inclusion. The American College of Physicians' guideline grading system and the American Thyroid Association's guideline criteria were used for critical appraisal of evidence and recommendations for therapeutic interventions.

RESULTS

The topics were divided into 2 parts: (1) Diagnosis - audiologic, electrophysiologic tests, and imaging; (2) Treatment - wait and scan protocols, surgery, radiosurgery/radiotherapy, and systemic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Decision making in VS treatment has become more challenging. MRI can diagnose increasingly smaller tumors, which has disastrous consequences for the patients and their families. It is important to develop an individualized approach for each case, which highly depends on the experience of each surgical team.

Presbycusis and Hearing Preservation in Observed Vestibular Schwannomas

OBJECTIVE

We reviewed a cohort of patients with untreated sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) and examined the relationship between high-frequency hearing loss (HFHL) in the non-VS ear and long-term hearing outcomes in the VS-affected ear. We hypothesized that the progression of HFHL is associated with accelerated hearing decline in sporadic VS.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary center.

PATIENTS

We studied 102 patients with sporadic VS diagnosed from 1999 to 2015 with ≥5 years of observation (median, 6.92; interquartile range, 5.85-9.29). Sixty-six patients had AAO-HNS class A/B hearing at presentation and were included in analysis.

INTERVENTIONS

Audiometry, serial magnetic resonance imaging for observation of VS.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Four-frequency pure tone average (PTA) and word recognition scores (WRS) in the VS-affected ear. Decline in high-frequency PTA (average of thresholds at 4000, 6000, and 8,000 Hz) was defined as ≥10 dB during the study period. Decline in WRS was defined as ≥10%.

RESULTS

Compared with those without, patients with progressive HFHL in the non-VS ear were more likely to experience a decline in WRS in the VS ear (80% vs. 54%, p = 0.031). However, the same group showed no difference (52% vs. 41%, p = 0.40) in decline in PTA of the VS ear.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with observed VS who experience progressive HFHL in the non-VS ear are more likely to experience significant declines in speech understanding in the VS-affected ear over time. Patients with a history of presbycusis may have an increased risk of losing serviceable hearing because of sporadic VS.

Upfront Radiosurgery vs a Wait-and-Scan Approach for Small- or Medium-Sized Vestibular Schwannoma: The V-REX Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Current guidelines for treating small- to medium-sized vestibular schwannoma recommend either upfront radiosurgery or waiting to treat until tumor growth has been detected radiographically.

Objective

To determine whether upfront radiosurgery provides superior tumor volume reduction to a wait-and-scan approach for small- to medium-sized vestibular schwannoma.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Randomized clinical trial of 100 patients with a newly diagnosed (<6 months) unilateral vestibular schwannoma and a maximal tumor diameter of less than 2 cm in the cerebellopontine angle as measured on magnetic resonance imaging. Participants were enrolled at the Norwegian National Unit for Vestibular Schwannoma from October 28, 2014, through October 3, 2017; 4-year follow-up ended on October 20, 2021.

Interventions

Participants were randomized to receive either upfront radiosurgery (n = 50) or to undergo a wait-and-scan protocol, for which treatment was given only upon radiographically documented tumor growth (n = 50). Participants underwent 5 annual study visits consisting of clinical assessment, radiological examination, audiovestibular tests, and questionnaires.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the ratio between tumor volume at the trial end at 4 years and baseline (V4:V0). There were 26 prespecified secondary outcomes, including patient-reported symptoms, clinical examinations, audiovestibular tests, and quality-of-life outcomes. Safety outcomes were the risk of salvage microsurgery and radiation-associated complications.

Results

Of the 100 randomized patients, 98 completed the trial and were included in the primary analysis (mean age, 54 years; 42% female). In the upfront radiosurgery group, 1 participant (2%) received repeated radiosurgery upon tumor growth, 2 (4%) needed salvage microsurgery, and 45 (94%) had no additional treatment. In the wait-and-scan group, 21 patients (42%) received radiosurgery upon tumor growth, 1 (2%) underwent salvage microsurgery, and 28 (56%) remained untreated. For the primary outcome of the ratio of tumor volume at the trial end to baseline, the geometric mean V4:V0 was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.66-1.15) in the upfront radiosurgery group and 1.51 (95% CI, 1.23-1.84) in the wait-and-scan group, showing a significantly greater tumor volume reduction in patients treated with upfront radiosurgery (wait-and-scan to upfront radiosurgery ratio, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.23-2.44; P = .002). Of 26 secondary outcomes, 25 showed no significant difference. No radiation-associated complications were observed.

Conclusion and relevance

Among patients with newly diagnosed small- and medium-sized vestibular schwannoma, upfront radiosurgery demonstrated a significantly greater tumor volume reduction at 4 years than a wait-and-scan approach with treatment upon tumor growth. These findings may help inform treatment decisions for patients with vestibular schwannoma, and further investigation of long-term clinical outcomes is needed.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02249572.

Factors associated with hearing outcomes after a middle fossa approach in 131 consecutive patients with vestibular schwannomas

OBJECTIVE

The middle fossa approach is an effective option for the treatment of small (Koos grade I and II) vestibular schwannomas (VSs) when the goal is hearing preservation. The authors evaluated the rates of hearing preservation and examined the factors associated with improved hearing outcomes after the middle fossa approach for VSs.

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-center cohort study evaluating the clinical outcomes after resection of small VSs using the middle fossa approach, consecutive adult patients (> 18 years) who underwent surgery between January 2000 and December 2021 were included. Clinical and imaging characteristics were analyzed, including baseline hearing status, duration of surgery, anesthetic parameters, and imaging characteristics of the surgically treated tumors.

RESULTS

Among the 131 included patients, 102 had valid and discoverable pre- and postoperative audiology assessments. The mean follow-up was 26 months (range 1-180 months). There were 85 patients with serviceable hearing preoperatively, defined as American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) class A or B, of whom 78% retained class A or B hearing at the last follow-up. Binary logistic regression demonstrated that preoperative hearing AAO-HNS class (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.77; p = 0.02), overlap between fundus and cochlea (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11-0.96; p = 0.04), and duration of anesthesia (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99; p = 0.03) were independent predictors of hearing outcomes. Additionally, 75% of patients with high diffusion-weighted imaging signal in the tumor (p = 0.009) and 67% of patients with the tumor originating at the modiolus of the cochlea (p = 0.004) had poor hearing outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The hearing preservation rates after microsurgical resection of small VSs using the middle fossa approach are high, with 78% of patients maintaining AAO-HNS class A or B hearing. Poor hearing status at baseline, longer duration of anesthesia, and large overlap between the fundus of the internal auditory canal and the cochlea were independently associated with unfavorable hearing outcomes. Imaging characteristics can be used to stratify patients' risk of hearing loss.

Long-Term Hearing Outcome After Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is one of the main treatment options in the management of small to medium size vestibular schwannomas (VSs), because of high tumor control rate and low cranial nerves morbidity. Series reporting long-term hearing outcome (>3 years) are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis, with the aim of focusing on long-term hearing preservation after SRS.

METHODS

Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we reviewed articles published between January 1990 and October 2020 and referenced in PubMed or Embase. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed clinical study or case series of VSs treated with SRS (single dose), reporting hearing outcome after SRS with a median or mean audiometric follow-up of at least 5 years. Hearing preservation, cranial nerves outcomes, and tumor control were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies were included. Hearing preservation was found in 59.4% of cases (median follow-up 6.7 years, 1409 patients). Main favorable prognostic factors were young age, good hearing status, early treatment after diagnosis, small tumor volume, low marginal irradiation dose, and maximal dose to the cochlea. Tumor control was achieved in 96.1%. Facial nerve deficit and trigeminal neuropathy were found in 1.3% and 3.2% of patients, respectively, both significantly higher in Linear Accelerator series than Gamma Knife series ( P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Long-term hearing preservation remains one of the main issues after SRS, with a major impact on health-related quality of life. Our meta-analysis suggests that hearing preservation can be achieved in almost 60% of patients after a median follow-up of 6.7 years, irrespective of the technique.

The 100 Most Highly Cited Publications on Hearing Preservation for Vestibular Schwannomas

OBJECTIVE

Vestibular schwannomas are benign, slow-growing tumors that often reduce patient quality of life by compressing nearby nerves. Neurological function preservation is one of the indicators of treatment success, with hearing preservation being the most difficult to obtain. This paper provides a bibliometric analysis of hearing preservation in treating acoustic neuromas and a greater understanding of the most highly cited articles, which have enhanced our understanding of this topic.

METHODS

Key terms of "acoustic neuroma," "vestibular schwannoma," and "hearing preservation" were queried through Web of Science. Articles were sorted by citation frequency, and the top 100 articles were recorded for title, name of first author, journal title, year of publication, total number of citations (and associated rank), average number of citations per year, country of the first author's associated institution, and type of study.

RESULTS

The top 100 cited articles were published from 1980 to 2014. The United States had the highest involvement as a country (55%), the University of Pittsburgh as an institution (13%), and The Journal of Neurosurgery as a publishing source (27%). Fourteen were reviews, and 86 were clinical papers. Of the 86, 73 were retrospective studies.

CONCLUSION

Bibliometric analyses summarize and assess potential areas of strength and knowledge gaps within the literature. Studies on hearing preservation in vestibular schwannomas mostly consist of retrospective reviews that assess postoperative outcomes of microsurgery and radiosurgery. Prospective studies and novel treatment options for hearing preservation in vestibular schwannomas are needed to increase current literature diversity.

Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Large Vestibular Schwannoma More Than 10 cm3: A Single-Center Indian Study

Introduction Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is an effective treatment for benign vestibular schwannomas (VSs). The established cutoffs have recently been challenged, as recent literature expanded the horizon of GKRS to larger tumors. Even though microsurgery remains the primary option for large VS, GKRS can provide reasonable tumor control and is more likely to avoid cranial neuropathies associated with open surgery.

Methods We analyzed patients with VS with volume exceeding 10 cm3 who underwent GKRS at our center from January 2006 to December 2016. Clinicoradiological and radiosurgical data were collected from medical records for statistical analysis. Follow-up was performed every 6 months with a clinical assessment along with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and audiometric evaluation in patients with serviceable hearing.

Results The study included 34 patients (18 males and 16 females) with an average age of 45.5 years. The mean tumor volume was 10.9 cm3 (standard deviation [SD], ± 0.83), with a median tumor dose of 12 Gy (interquartile range, 11.5–12) and a mean follow-up of 34.7 months (SD, ± 23.8). Tumor response was graded as regression in 50%, stable in 44.1%, and increase or GKRS failure in 2 cases (5.8%). Treatment failure was noted in five cases (14.7%), requiring microsurgical excision and a ventriculoperitoneal shunt post-GKRS. The tumor control rate for the cohort is 85.3%, with a facial preservation rate of 96% (24/25) and hearing loss in all (5/5), while three patients developed new-onset hypoesthesia. We noted that gait ataxia and involvement of cranial nerve V or VII at initial presentation were associated with GKRS failure in univariate analysis.

Conclusion Microsurgery should remain the first-choice treatment option for large VSs. GKRS is a viable alternative with good tumor control and improved or stabilized cranial neuropathies with a low complication rate.

Assessing the long-term safety and efficacy of gamma knife and linear accelerator radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Differences in long-term outcomes of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) between gamma knife (GK) and linear accelerator (LINAC) systems for vestibular schwannoma (VS) management remain unclear. To investigate differences in safety and efficacy between modalities, we conducted a meta-analysis of studies over the past decade.

Methods

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were queried for studies with the following inclusion criteria: English language, published between January 2010 and April 2020, cohort size ≥30, and mean/median follow-up ≥5 years. Odds ratios (OR) compared rates of tumor control, hearing preservation, and cranial nerve toxicities before and after SRS.

Results

Thirty-nine studies were included (29 GK, 10 LINAC) with 6516 total patients. Tumor control rates were 93% (95% CI 91-94%) and 94% (95% CI 91-97%) for GK and LINAC, respectively. Both GK (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.13) and LINAC (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.29-0.76) reduced odds of serviceable hearing. Neither GK (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.41-1.22) nor LINAC (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.64-2.00) impacted facial nerve function. GK decreased odds of trigeminal nerve (TN) impairment (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32-0.94) while LINAC did not impact TN function (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.81-2.61). Lastly, LINAC offered decreased odds of tinnitus (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.87) not observed with GK (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.48-1.01).

Conclusions

VS tumor control and hearing preservation rates are comparable between GK and LINAC SRS. GK may better preserve TN function, while LINAC decreases tinnitus rates. Future studies are warranted to investigate the efficacy of GK and LINAC SRS more directly.

Time-based Assessment of Hearing Preservation Rates After Microsurgical Resection of Vestibular Schwannomas: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To determine short- and intermediate-term hearing preservation rates after microsurgical resection of vestibular schwannoma (VS).

DATA SOURCES

Systematic review of the Ovid, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases.

STUDY SELECTION

This study was restricted to full-text English-language articles detailing VS resection via the middle cranial fossa or retrosigmoid approaches. Documentation of pre- and posttreatment hearing outcomes with American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Gardner-Robertson, or word recognition score scales, as well as time to follow-up were required. Duplicate data sets, studies with >10% of patients with neurofibromatosis two, previous or nonsurgical VS treatment, case reports with <five patients, or studies detailing decompressive surgery were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors independently performed full-text reviews to determine study eligibility. Discrepancies were settled by consensus. "Class A/B, I/II" hearing was defined as AAO-HNS Class A or B, Gardner-Robertson Class 1 or 2, or PTA ≤ 50 dB with word recognition score ≥ 50% on audiogram.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Pooled estimates of preserved Class A/B, I/II hearing at last postoperative follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Of 1323 reports, 14 were utilized in analyses yielding data from 2,977 patients. Mean follow-up was 52.5 months (SD = 19.9). Class A/B, 1/2 hearing was preserved at last follow-up in 57% of patients. Meta-regression revealed that resection through the middle cranial fossa was associated with preservation of serviceable hearing. Moreover, when preserved in the immediate postoperative period, it seems to be stable over time.

The Effect of Prescription Isodose Variation on Tumor Control and Toxicities in Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma: Propensity Score-Matched Case–Control Study

Objective Vestibular schwannoma (VS) treated with Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was typically performed at 50% isodose line (IDL50); however, the impact of IDL variation on outcomes is poorly understood. This study aimed to compare tumor control (TC) and toxicities between treatment at 40% (IDL40) and 50% (IDL50).

Methods Sporadic/unilateral VS patients treated with SRS dose 12 to 14 Gy and prescription isodose volume ≤10cm3 were included. Propensity score matching was applied to IDL40 cohort to generate an IDL50 companion cohort, adjusting for age and prescription isodose volume. After exclusion of patients with follow-up <24 months, there were 30 and 28 patients in IDL40 and IDL50 cohorts, respectively.

Results Median follow-up time was 96 months (24–225 months). Actuarial and radiographic TC rates were 91.8% and clinical TC was 96.2% both at 5 and 10 years. TC was higher in IDL40 cohort but not significant (96.4 vs. 86.7%; p = 0.243). Hearing preservation (HP) rates were 71.9 and 39.2% at 5- and 10-year intervals, with significantly higher rates of HP noted in IDL40 cohort (83.3 vs. 57.1% at 5-year interval; 62.5 vs. 11.4% at 10-year interval; p = 0.017). Permanent facial neuropathy occurred in two patients, both from the IDL50 cohort (3.5%). Rates of post-SRS steroid treatment or shunt placement for hydrocephalus were slightly higher in IDL50 patients (6.9 vs. 17.9%; p = 0.208 and 3.3 vs. 7.1%; p = 0.532).

Conclusion For treatment of VS with SRS, dose prescription at IDL40 or IDL50 provides excellent long-term TC and toxicity profiles. IDL40 may be associated with improved long-term HP.

Impact of Treatment on Vestibular Schwannoma-Associated Symptoms: A Prospective Study Comparing Treatment Modalities

OBJECTIVE

The degree to which various treatment modalities modify vestibular schwannoma (VS)-associated symptoms has received limited attention. The purpose of this study was to determine how different treatment modalities affect subjective symptoms in those presenting with VS.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective survey.

SETTING

Tertiary neurotology referral center.

METHODS

Patients with sporadic VS who received treatment at our institution were prospectively surveyed with a VS symptom questionnaire. Those who completed a baseline survey prior to treatment and at least 1 posttreatment survey were included. The prospective survey evaluated the severity of self-reported symptoms (Likert scale, 1-10), including tinnitus, dizziness or imbalance, headaches, and hearing loss.

RESULTS

A total of 244 patients were included (mean age, 57 years). The mean duration of follow-up was 2.1 years, and the median number of surveys completed was 2 (interquartile range, 1-3). Seventy-eight (32%) cases were managed with observation, 118 (48%) with microsurgery, and 48 (20%) with radiosurgery. Multivariable analyses revealed no statistically significant difference in the change in tinnitus (P = .15), dizziness or imbalance (P = 0.66), or headaches (P = .24) among treatment groups. Evaluation of clinically important differences demonstrated that microsurgery leads to significant bidirectional changes in headaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited prospective data exist regarding the progression or resolution of subjective symptoms in those presenting with VS. This study suggests that tinnitus, dizziness or imbalance, and headaches are unlikely to be significantly modified by treatment modality and generally should not be used to direct treatment choice.

Vestibular Schwannoma: What We Know and Where We are Heading

Vestibular schwannoma (VS) is a Schwann cell-derived tumour arising from the vestibulocochlear nerve. Although benign, it represents a threat to intracranial structures due to mass effect and carries a small risk of malignant transformation. VS therefore represents an important healthcare burden. We review the literature regarding pathogenesis, risk factors, and diagnosis of VS. The current and future potential management strategies are also discussed. A narrative review of all relevant papers known to the authors was conducted. The majority of VS remain clinically stable and do not require interventional procedures. Nevertheless, various surgical techniques exist for removing VS, the most common of which are translabyrinthine and retrosigmoid approaches. Due to surgical risks such as hearing loss, facial nerve dysfunction, post-operative headache, and cerebrospinal fluid leakage, a "watch and rescan" approach is adopted for most patients. Radiotherapy is a useful alternative and has been shown to have a similar response for growth restriction. Due to the heterogeneous nature of VS, there is a lack of consensus regarding management of tumours that are too large for conservative management but too small to indicate surgery. Emerging biologic therapies, such as Bevacizumab, Everolimus, and Lapatinib, as well as anti-inflammatories like aspirin are promising potential treatments; however, long-term evidence of their efficacy is required. The knowledge base regarding VS continues to improve. With increased understanding of the pathogenesis of these tumors, we believe future work should focus on pharmacologic intervention. Biologic therapies aimed toward improved patient outcomes are particularly promising.

The emerging role of hearing loss rehabilitation in patients with vestibular schwannoma treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery: literature review

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is currently the most common treatment for small- to medium-size vestibular schwannoma (VS). Despite favorable outcome, hearing deterioration still remains an underestimated problem, and the role of hearing rehabilitation is an underinvestigated topic. Among available technologies, cochlear implant (CI) should represent a valid alternative in sporadic VS with single-sided deafness and in neurofibromatosis (NF2) with bilateral profound hearing loss. A literature review of the current clinical data was performed searching scientific literature databases. From all of the articles found, 16 papers were selected. Forty-four subjects treated with radiosurgery (18 male, 19 female, and in 7 cases, sex were not specified; 43 NF2 and 1 sporadic VS) were included in the analysis. Epidemiological, clinical, tumor, treatment, and audiological data were collected. Clinical outcome at last follow-up showed an audiological improvement in 25 of the 44 patients. The audiological outcome was unchanged in 16 cases. Audiological deterioration was recorded in 3 cases. Severity of NF2 phenotype, long history of ipsilateral profound deafness before implantation, progressive tumor growth, and high radiation dose (20 and 40 Gy) were found in patients with a worst audiological outcome. Hearing rehabilitation can improve audiological results for VS patients following SRS in selected cases. Hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implant (CI) in SSD leads to partial restoration of binaural hearing with an improvement in speech comprehension in noise and in sound localization, and partial suppression of subjective incapacitating tinnitus. SRS followed by CI may represent in selected cases a potential emerging option in the management of these patients, aimed at improving their quality of life. Possible implications for the follow-up of these patients are still present, although partially resolved.

Effect of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery on Vestibular Schwannoma with Serviceable Hearing: A Single-Center Indian Study

OBJECTIVE

Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is an established treatment modality for vestibular schwannomas (VSs). The tumor control and hearing preservation rates suggest that GKRS is a good alternative treatment for small- and medium-size VS. Data are lacking from India regarding GKRS for VSs. Our aim was to find the hearing preservation and tumor control rates and the factors contributing to these.

METHODS

In a retrospective 9-year study period, 87 patients had undergone GKRS for unilateral VS with Gardner-Robertson (GR) class I or II serviceable hearing. All 87 had been evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging and audiometry before GKRS and during follow-up to assess for the factors influencing tumor control and hearing preservation.

RESULTS

Of the 87 patients, 77 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years and magnetic resonance imaging and audiometry evaluations available were included in the present study. The median follow-up period was 30 months. The tumor control rate and hearing preservation rate was 96.1% and 79.2%, respectively. Hearing preservation was not affected by the tumor volume. However, age >40 years, pre-GKRS pure tone average <30 decibels, speech discrimination score >85%, pre-GKRS Gardner-Robertson grade I hearing, mean cochlear dose <4 Gy, and pre-GKRS Ohata class of laterality C, D, E were significant on univariate analysis. The multivariate analysis revealed that age >40 years (P = 0.017), pre-GKRS pure tone average <30 decibels (P = 0.002), and Gardner-Robertson class I (P = 0.001) were significant factors. No patient developed cranial nerve dysfunction, hydrocephalus, or malignant degeneration.

CONCLUSION

For most patients with small VSs, GKRS will be an effective alternative treatment to microsurgery with retained serviceable hearing and good tumor control.

Effects of CyberKnife therapy for vestibular schwannoma on hearing: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of CyberKnife stereotactic radiotherapy for the treatment of vestibular schwannoma on hearing, as evaluated by audiological tests.

METHODS

Patients with vestibular schwannoma were evaluated before and after CyberKnife radiosurgery. Evaluation included pure tone thresholds, speech discrimination scores, auditory brainstem responses and radiological signs.

RESULTS

The study comprised 26 patients diagnosed with vestibular schwannoma and subsequently treated with CyberKnife radiosurgery. The mean follow-up time was 16.4 months. The mean post-treatment hearing preservation rate was 69.23 per cent. There was no significant relationship between hearing loss after treatment and patient age, radiation dosage during treatment, or size of tumour. With regard to auditory brainstem responses, patients with hearing loss following treatment had a significantly higher inter-peak latency between waves I-III than patients with preserved hearing.

CONCLUSION

Stereotactic CyberKnife radiosurgery is an excellent alternative treatment modality for patients with vestibular schwannoma, and results in acceptable preservation of hearing. Residual hearing following CyberKnife therapy is not significantly affected by factors such as age, size of tumour or dosage of treatment.

Comparing Outcomes Following Salvage Microsurgery in Vestibular Schwannoma Patients Failing Gamma-knife Radiosurgery or Microsurgery

OBJECTIVE

The increasing use of primary gamma-knife radiosurgery (GKS) for the treatment of vestibular schwannoma (VS) has led to a concomitant increase in the number of patients requiring salvage surgery for GKS failure. When patients underwent GKS as the primary treatment, it is known that dissecting tumor from adjacent nerves during salvage surgery is more difficult. In this report, we share our clinical experience with such patients and analyze the clinical findings of patients with tumor regrowth/recurrence.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary center.

PATIENTS

Nine patients who underwent salvage surgery for VS regrowth/recurrence after GKS or microsurgery were enrolled.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Symptom progression, radiological changes, intraoperative findings, and surgical outcomes were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

Six patients with previous GKS and three with previous microsurgery underwent salvage microsurgery. The most obvious symptom of tumor regrowth was aggravation of hearing loss. Salvage surgery in all patients was limited to subtotal or near-total resection via a translabyrinthine/transotic approach. Severe adhesion, thickening, and fibrosis were more prominent findings in the GKS than in the previous microsurgery group. Dissection of the tumor from the facial nerve was more difficult in the GKS than in the microsurgery patients. Despite anatomical preservation of the facial nerve in all the six patients, three in the GKS group, but none in the revision microsurgery group, had worsening of facial nerve function.

CONCLUSION

Salvage microsurgery of VS after failed GKS is more difficult than revision microsurgery, and the facial nerve outcomes are relatively poor. Therefore, the primary method of VS treatment should be carefully chosen. Additional imaging studies are recommended in patients with a sudden change in hearing loss who underwent GKS.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Cystic Vestibular Schwannomas

BACKGROUND

The optimum treatment for cystic vestibular schwannoma (VS) remains controversial. Anecdotally, many treating physicians feel that cystic VSs do not respond to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as well as noncystic tumors.

OBJECTIVE

To present outcomes after treatment of predominantly cystic VS with SRS.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained clinical database of patients undergoing Gamma Knife (Elekta Instruments, Stockholm, Sweden) radiosurgery (GKRS) for VS at a single tertiary academic referral center was retrospectively reviewed. Patients diagnosed with cystic VS who were treated with GKRS between 1997 and 2014 were analyzed. Size-matched solid tumors treated with GKRS during this period were selected as controls.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (12 women; median age at treatment, 56 years; range, 36-85 years) with cystic VS met inclusion criteria. The median radiologic follow-up within the cystic group was 63 months (range, 17-201 months), and the median change in tumor size was -4.9 mm (range, -10.4 to 9.3 mm). Sixteen tumors (80%) shrank, 2 (10%) remained stable, and 2 (10%) enlarged, accounting for a tumor control rate of 90%. The median radiologic follow-up in the noncystic control group was 67 months (range, 6-141 months), and the median change in size was -2.0 mm (range, -10.4 to 2.5 mm). Tumor control in the solid group was 90%. Comparing only those tumors that decreased in size showed that there was a trend toward a greater reduction within the cystic group ( P = .05).

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates that tumor control after SRS for cystic VS may not differ from that of noncystic VS in selected cases.

Quality of life in patients with unilateral vestibular schwannoma on wait and see - strategy

OBJECTIVE

A 'wait and see' strategy is an option when managing patients with small vestibular schwannomas (VS). A risk of growth and worsening of hearing may influence a patient's daily quality of life (QOL). Therefore, the present study focused on QOL parameters in patients who are on a 'wait and see' strategy following magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based diagnosis of small unilateral VS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-five patients (mean age 64.4 years; male:female, 32:33) who suffered from a small unilateral VS (9.34 mm, range 1.5-23 mm) between 2013 and 2016 were included in a prospective single center study. During follow-up, in addition to clinical and neurological examinations and MRI imaging, all patients answered the Short Form 36 questionnaire once to characterize QOL. Additionally, the severity of tinnitus was determined by the Mini-TQ-12 from Hiller and Goebel.

RESULTS

It was found during follow-up that there was no lowering of QOL in patients with small VS who were on 'wait and see' strategy compared with Germany's general population and no tumor growth was detected in 53 patients (81.5%). Patients with a tumor diameter larger than 10 mm did not suffer from stronger tinnitus, vertigo or unsteadiness than the group with an average tumor size, which is smaller than 10 mm. Sixty-two patients (95.4%) showed ipsilateral hearing loss and three of these reported deafness (4.6%). Severe vertigo or tinnitus is connected with lower levels of mental component scale and physical component scale. These findings reduced the QOL (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In our series, QOL is not influenced in patients with unilateral untreated small VS in comparison to Germany's general population. This is helpful information when advising patients during follow-up and finding out the optimal timing of individual treatment.

Predictors of hearing outcomes following low-dose stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with vestibular schwannomas: A retrospective cohort review

OBJECTIVES

Hearing deterioration is a major concern for hearing-preserved patients with vestibular schwannomas who are treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Thus, determining which patients are more likely to have worse hearing outcomes following SRS may facilitate clinicians in deciding whether conservative policy should be applied in the interest of hearing preservation. This study aimed to define the predictors of hearing outcomes following SRS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 100 patients who underwent low-dose SRS (12- to 13-Gy marginal dose) for vestibular schwannomas between January 2004 and January 2014. Clinical factors and hearing outcomes following radiosurgery were reviewed.

RESULTS

All patients had serviceable hearing at diagnosis and prior to SRS. The median follow-up period was 6.5years (range, 3-10years). The hearing preservation rate in the first, third, and fifth year after radiosurgery was 89%, 68%, and 63%, respectively. A mean cochlear dose lower than 4Gy was a favorable predictor of hearing outcome. Maximal cochlear dose, patient age, pre-treatment pure-tone average, and imaging characteristics were not associated with post-treatment hearing preservation. Our study showed an accelerated rate of deterioration of serial pure-tone average in the first 3years, followed by a more gradual decline after radiosurgery.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that cochlear dose constraint is the most crucial factor for hearing preservation. This study provides insight into the rate of hearing preservation and the pattern of hearing deterioration following radiosurgery and can help clinicians advise patients of hearing outcomes following SRS.

Predictive Factors of Unfavorable Events After Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS) for the treatment of vestibular schwannoma (VS) introduces risks to the facial nerve and auditory perception and may involve post-treatment complications such as pseudoprogression, hydrocephalus, and other cranial neuropathies. This study of patients with VS who underwent GKS investigated radiosurgical results, focusing on post-treatment complications and identifying the factors that predict such complications.

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective review of all VS patients treated with the Perfexion Leksell Gamma Knife between November 2007 and October 2010 at our institution. Patients who underwent at least 12 months of clinical and radiologic assessments before and after GKS were included.

RESULTS

All 235 patients were included in the analyses reported here. The 5-year serviceable hearing and facial nerve preservation values were 73.9% and 94.3%, respectively. Following GKS, 43 patients (18.30%) showed pseudoprogression, 15 (6.38%) exhibited hydrocephalus, 22 (9.36%) showed trigeminal neuropathy, 14 (5.96%) showed vertigo, and 25 (10.64%) showed facial myokymia. According to multivariate analysis, solid tumor nature was significantly associated with pseudoprogression and patient age was significantly associated with hydrocephalus. Patients receiving margin doses ≥13 Gy had a significantly higher probability of loss of serviceable hearing. Patients with smaller tumors had a trigeminal nerve preservation rate comparable with patients harboring larger tumors. Patients receiving margin doses <13 Gy or older patients had a significantly higher probability of vestibular nerve dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Further prospective studies should be designed to provide further insight into the exact relationship between the predictive factors we investigated and post-treatment complications.

Preserving normal facial nerve function and improving hearing outcome in large vestibular schwannomas with a combined approach: planned subtotal resection followed by gamma knife radiosurgery

Objective

To perform planned subtotal resection followed by gamma knife surgery (GKRS) in a series of patients with large vestibular schwannoma (VS), aiming at an optimal functional outcome for facial and cochlear nerves.

Methods

Patient characteristics, surgical and dosimetric features, and outcome were collected prospectively at the time of treatment and during the follow-up.

Results

A consecutive series of 32 patients was treated between July 2010 and June 2016. Mean follow-up after surgery was 29 months (median 24, range 4–78). Mean presurgical tumor volume was 12.5 cm³ (range 1.47–34.9). Postoperative status showed normal facial nerve function (House–Brackmann I) in all patients. In a subgroup of 17 patients with serviceable hearing before surgery and in which cochlear nerve preservation was attempted at surgery, 16 (94.1%) retained serviceable hearing. Among them, 13 had normal hearing (Gardner–Robertson class 1) before surgery, and 10 (76.9%) retained normal hearing after surgery. Mean duration between surgery and GKRS was 6.3 months (range 3.8–13.9). Mean tumor volume at GKRS was 3.5 cm³ (range 0.5–12.8), corresponding to mean residual volume of 29.4% (range 6–46.7) of the preoperative volume. Mean marginal dose was 12 Gy (range 11–12). Mean follow-up after GKRS was 24 months (range 3–60). Following GKRS, there were no new neurological deficits, with facial and hearing functions remaining identical to those after surgery in all patients. Three patients presented with continuous growth after GKRS, were considered failures, and benefited from the same combined approach a second time.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that large VS management, with planned subtotal resection followed by GKRS, might yield an excellent clinical outcome, allowing the normal facial nerve and a high level of cochlear nerve functions to be retained. Our functional results with this approach in large VS are comparable with those obtained with GKRS alone in small- and medium-sized VS. Longer term follow-up is necessary to fully evaluate this approach, especially regarding tumor control.

Low-Dose Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas: Tumor Control and Cranial Nerve Function Preservation After 11 Gy

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to report tumor control rates and cranial nerve function after low dose (11.0 Gy) Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) in patients with vestibular schwannomas.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on 30 consecutive patients with vestibular schwannomas treated from March 2004 to August 2010 with GKRS at the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University. The marginal dose for all patients was 11.0 Gy prescribed to the 50% isodose line. Median follow-up time was 42 months. The median treatment volume was 0.53 cm3. Hearing data were obtained from audiometry reports before and after radiosurgery.

RESULTS

The actuarial progression free survival (PFS) based on freedom from surgery was 100% at 5 years. PFS based on freedom from persistent growth was 91% at 5 years. One patient experienced tumor progression requiring resection at 87 months. Serviceable hearing, defined as Gardner-Robertson score of I-II, was preserved in 50% of patients. On univariate and multivariate analyses, only higher mean and maximum dose to the cochlea significantly decreased the proportion of patients with serviceable hearing.

CONCLUSION

Vestibular schwannomas can be treated with low doses (11.0 Gy) of GKRS with good tumor control and cranial nerve preservation.

A matched cohort comparison of clinical outcomes following microsurgical resection or stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with small- and medium-sized vestibular schwannomas

OBJECTIVE

A randomized trial that compares clinical outcomes following microsurgery (MS) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for patients with small- and medium-sized vestibular schwannomas (VSs) is impractical, but would have important implications for clinical decision making. A matched cohort analysis was conducted to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients treated with MS or SRS.

METHODS

The records of 399 VS patients who were cared for by 2 neurosurgeons and 1 neurotologist between 2001 and 2014 were evaluated. From this data set, 3 retrospective matched cohorts were created to compare hearing preservation (21 matched pairs), facial nerve preservation (83 matched pairs), intervention-free survival, and complication rates (85 matched pairs) between cases managed with SRS and patients managed with MS. Cases were matched for age at surgery (± 10 years) and lesion size (± 0.1 cm). To compare hearing outcomes, cases were additionally matched for preoperative Class A hearing according to the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery guidelines. To compare facial nerve (i.e., cranial nerve [CN] VII) outcomes, cases were additionally matched for preoperative House-Brackmann (HB) score. Investigators who were not involved with patient care reviewed the clinical and imaging records. The reported outcomes were as assessed at the time of the last follow-up, unless otherwise stated.

RESULTS

The preservation of preoperative Class A hearing status was achieved in 14.3% of MS cases compared with 42.9% of SRS cases (OR 4.5; p < 0.05) after an average follow-up interval of 43.7 months and 30.3 months, respectively. Serviceable hearing was preserved in 42.8% of MS cases compared with 85.7% of SRS cases (OR 8.0; p < 0.01). The rates of postoperative CN VII dysfunction were low for both groups, although significantly higher in the MS group (HB III–IV 11% vs 0% for SRS; OR 21.3; p < 0.01) at a median follow-up interval of 35.7 and 19.0 months for MS and SRS, respectively. There was no difference in the need for subsequent intervention (2 MS patients and 2 SRS patients).

CONCLUSIONS

At this high-volume center, VS resection or radiosurgery for tumors ≤ 2.8 cm in diameter was associated with low overall morbidity. The need for subsequent intervention was the same in both groups. SRS was associated with improved hearing and facial preservation rates and reduced morbidity, but with a shorter average follow-up period. Facial function was excellent in both groups. Since patients were not randomly selected for surgery, different clinical outcomes may be of different value to individual patients. Both anticipated medical outcomes and patient goals remain the drivers of treatment decisions.

Optimal outcomes for hearing preservation in the management of small vestibular schwannomas

Objective:

To undertake a systematic review of the role of microsurgery, in relation to observation and stereotactic radiation, in the management of small vestibular schwannomas with serviceable hearing.

Methods:

The Medline database was searched for publications that included the terms ‘vestibular schwannoma’ and/or ‘acoustic neuroma’, occurring in conjunction with ‘hearing’. Articles were manually screened to identify those concerning vestibular schwannomas under 1.5 cm in greatest dimension. Thereafter, only publications discussing both pre-operative and post-operative hearing were considered.

Results:

Twenty-six papers were identified. Observation is an acceptable strategy for small tumours with slow growth where hearing preservation is not a consideration. In contrast, microsurgery, including the middle fossa approach, may provide excellent hearing outcomes, particularly when a small tumour has begun to cause hearing loss. Immediate post-operative hearing usually predicts long-term hearing. Recent data on stereotactic radiation suggest long-term deterioration of hearing following definitive therapy.

Conclusion:

In patients under the age of 65 years with small vestibular schwannomas, microsurgery via the middle fossa approach offers durable preservation of hearing.

Hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma management

OBJECTIVE

To compare hearing preservation between stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and conservative treatment of patients with unilateral vestibular schwannoma.

DATA SOURCES

Retrospective case series comparing hearing outcomes of patients with a unilateral vestibular schwannoma managed conservatively or with stereotactic radiotherapy in a tertiary care academic centre.

REVIEW METHODS

PATIENTS

Tumor database patients with American Academy of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Class A or B hearing at the onset of study. Stereotactic radiotherapy patients were predominantly those who failed conservative management.

INTERVENTIONS

Audiometric pure tone averages and speech discrimination scores as well as patient demographics, tumor location, size and growth were extracted.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Hearing outcome measures were: 1) Hearing Preservation, i.e. no drop from Class A/B to Class C/D hearing, 2) Hearing Survival of Class A/B hearing in months, 3) Audiometric Pure Tone Averages, Difference between post-treatment and pre-treatment, and 4) Speech Discrimination Score Difference (pre-treatment-post treatment). Survival analysis and non-parametric tests were used for hearing outcome measures, with multiple covariates tested.

RESULTS

Overall, serviceable hearing preservation among the 123 patients was 51%. The median hearing survival time was 46 months (mean 59 months). The Pure Tone averages and Speech Discrimination score differences were 16 dB and 82% respectively over a median follow-up time of 43 months. No significant difference was found between the conservative and SRT groups in any hearing outcome. Class A patients showed far better hearing survival than Class B patients.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference was demonstrated as to measures of hearing outcomes between stereotactic radiotherapy and conservative management. Excellent existing hearing appears to be the best predictor of long term hearing survival in the cohort studied.

Linear accelerator radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas: Results of medium-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

To examine tumour control, via volume changes, and the complications of linear accelerator (LINAC)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment of vestibular schwannomas (VSs) on medium-term follow-up.

METHODS

Between September 2003 and November 2009 fifty consecutive patients with VSs treated with SRS using a marginal dose of 12.5 Gy utilizing a LINAC equipped with a micro-multileaf collimator were identified. Evaluation included serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and neurological and hearing examinations.

RESULTS

The median tumour volume at treatment was 2.4 (range: 0.24-10.59) cm3. The intracranial diameter of the tumours ranged between 7.7 and 28.7 (median: 15.8) mm. Follow-up MRI was available for analysis on 49 patients. The median radiological follow-up period was 5.8 (range: 1.4-9.2) years. The median tumour volume at last follow-up was 1.1 (range: 0.03-5.3) cm3. VS decreased in size in 45 (90%) patients, with a median reduction in tumour volume of 1.46 (range: 0.06-9.29) cm3 or a median tumour size reduction of 59% of the baseline (range: 6-90%) in these patients. VS remained stable in 2 patients and increased in size in 2 patients. Only 1 patient (2%) required additional intervention (surgery). 15 patients had useful hearing pre-treatment; 10 post-treatment pure-tone audiograms of these patients were available. 5 (50%) patients still had useful hearing post treatment. Non-auditory adverse radiation effects included new (House-Brackmann grade II) or worsened facial nerve palsy (House-Brackmann grade II to grade V) in 2 (4%) patients and trigeminal sensory disturbance in 2 (4%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

At medium term, the vast majority of VSs treated with LINAC-based SRS exhibit tumour shrinkage. The slightly higher rate of facial nerve palsy compared with Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) results may be related to the learning curve. Other complications were similar to reported GKS results for VSs of comparable sizes.

Meta-analysis on the clinical outcomes in patients with intralabyrinthine schwannomas: conservative management vs. microsurgery

The objective of this review is to compare the symptomatological evolution following conservative management (CM) or microsurgery (MS) in patients with intralabyrinthine schwannomas (ILS). A thorough systematic review of the English and French literature from 1948 to February 2014 was performed using Ovid Medline. An ancestor search was also completed. The major inclusion criterion consisted of a diagnosis of ILS with magnetic resonance imaging. Patients with a classic vestibular schwannoma, cases of incidentaloma during surgery or an autopsy were the main exclusion criteria. Thirty-one studies met our selective criteria. Descriptive data were collected from the articles. Clinical outcomes regarding the hearing loss, tinnitus, vertigo, dizziness and aural fullness were stated as improved, unchanged or worse at the last follow-up. All data were then separated into two different groups according to the management option: CM and MS. The data were analyzed using a Pearson χ (2) test and Fisher's exact test. This meta-analysis suggests that MS has a statistically significant favorable outcome regarding symptom relief compared to CM in patients with ILS suffering from tinnitus, vertigo and dizziness. Hearing level was not compared between treatment groups, as MS leads to anacusis. An indicative bias was the main limitation of this study, as patients suffering from intractable vertigo with moderate-to-severe hearing loss were referred to MS. Therefore, in the presence of a serviceable hearing, we suggest that CM should be the treatment of choice.

Gamma Knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: clinical results at long-term follow-up in a series of 379 patients

Object

Since the 1990s, Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has become the first-line treatment option for small- to medium-size vestibular schwannomas (VSs), especially in patients without mass effect–related symptoms and with functional hearing. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of GKRS, in terms of tumor control, hearing preservation, and complications, in a series of 379 consecutive patients treated for VS.

Methods

Of 523 patients treated at the authors' institution for VS between 2001 and 2010, the authors included 379 who underwent GKRS as the primary treatment. These patients were not affected by Type 2 neurofibromatosis and had clinical follow-up of at least 36 months. Clinical follow-up (mean and median 75.7 and 69.5 months, respectively) was performed for all patients, whereas audiometric and quantitative radiological follow-up examinations were obtained for only 153 and 219 patients, respectively. The patients' ages ranged from 23 to 85 years (mean 59 years). The mean tumor volume was 1.94 ± 2.2 cm3 (median 1.2 cm3, range 0.013–14.3 cm3), and the median margin dose was 13 Gy (range 11–15 Gy). Parameters considered as determinants of the clinical outcome were long-term tumor control, hearing preservation, and complications. A statistical analysis was performed to correlate clinical outcomes with the radiological features of the tumor, dose-planning parameters, and patient characteristics.

Results

Control of the tumor with GKRS was achieved in 97.1% of the patients. In 82.7% of the patients, the tumor volume had decreased at the last follow-up, with a mean relative reduction of 34.1%. The rate of complications was very low, with most consisting of a transient worsening of preexisting symptoms. Patients who had vertigo, balance disorders, or facial or trigeminal impairment usually experienced a complete or at least significant symptom relief after treatment. However, no significant improvement was observed in patients previously reporting tinnitus. The overall rate of preservation of functional hearing at the long-term follow-up was 49%; in patients with hearing classified as Gardner-Robertson (GR) Class I, this value was 71% and reached 93% among cases of GR Class I hearing in patients younger than 55 years.

Conclusions

Gamma Knife radiosurgery is a safe and effective treatment for VS, achieving tumor control in 97.1% of cases and resulting in a very low morbidity rate. Younger GR Class I patients had a significantly higher probability of retaining functional hearing even at the 10-year follow-up; for this reason, the time between symptom onset, diagnosis, and treatment should be shortened to achieve better outcomes in functional hearing preservation.

Towards a hypermodern theory of meningioma surgery

In spite of significant improvements in patient outcomes, meningioma surgery continues to be associated with appreciable morbidity and variability in management schemes, suggesting an opportunity for improvement. In this article, we attempt to cross-pollinate our discipline with theoretical concepts and analytic frameworks from the field of cultural studies over the past several decades. We provide an overview of modernist, postmodernist, and hypermodernist thinking, the last of which emphasizes rapid progress, repeated recreation of dogmas, and data-driven decision-making. We subsequently demonstrate how the evolution of these schools of thought can be used to improve the analytic approach to comparative outcomes research in neurosurgery, with meningioma research as a principal example. We contend that with the renaissance of microsurgery and advent of improved technologies in meningioma management over recent years, modernist analytic methods are no longer adequate. Instead, we advocate for a new hypermodern paradigm that provides evidence-based answers to unresolved questions, minimizes unwarranted variability in clinical practice patterns, and provides a system for continuous assessment and reassessment of outcomes in the rapidly evolving environment of contemporary skull base neurosurgery. In particular, we discuss the relevance of historical case series from leading neurosurgeons for clinical decision-making, the value of seeking new data for longstanding clinical questions, the merits of radiosurgery versus open surgery, and the importance of recognizing tumor heterogeneity rather than simply stratifying them based on general characteristics such as tumor location. In turn, we lay a conceptual foundation for improving outcomes research in meningioma surgery.

Incidentalomas to glioblastoma multiforme

In April 1999, a 25-year-old male underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a control subject for a multiple sclerosis study. The scan serendipitously revealed two lesions (‘incidentalomas’) in the right frontal lobe. Initially, he was asymptomatic and was monitored with interval MRI scans. After years of monitoring, contact was accidentally lost. He later presented following a witnessed generalized seizure. He was commenced on phenytoin, which was changed to carbamazepine due to side effects. MRI revealed three gliomas and an open brain biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of low-grade astrocytoma. The location and multifocal nature of the gliomas ruled out complete neurosurgical debulking. However, his seizures increased in frequency and in February 2007, the biopsy confirmed malignant transformation to multifocal glioblastoma multiforme. He successfully underwent partial debulking, radiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy. Currently, he is 6 years post-treatment and asymptomatic.

Changing times and early debates

The machine was soon being called the Gamma Knife. Its spread led to increasing numbers of papers from different centers but particularly Pittsburgh. As mentioned in the preface, the introduction of new methods in medicine is seldom without problems. There were a number of squabbles about the treatment of various indications. It was suggested that for AVMs, the GKS was unnecessary. For meningiomas, there was marked skepticism within the milieu itself in the early days. Metastases were not treated in Stockholm because of Leksell's opposition to the treatment of malignant disease, and indeed, these tumors became generally popular indications rather later. There was a thought that pituitary adenomas could be better treated with GKS but it proved too unreliable, and for these tumors, GKS remains an ancillary treatment method. The most marked disagreements were with respect of the vestibular schwannomas. This discussion continues to the present.

Fractionated radiation therapy for vestibular schwannoma

Vestibular schwannomas are the most common tumors of the cerebellopontine angle. Multiple management paradigms exist for patients with these benign tumors, including observation, microsurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, and fractionated radiation therapy, or some combination of these. While the proper course of management is controversial, the goals of therapy are to achieve excellent local tumor control and optimize functional outcomes with as little treatment-related morbidity as possible. Decision-making is tailored to patient-specific factors such as tumor size, clinical presentation, patient age, and goals of hearing preservation. We review the literature in order to summarize the application of fractionated radiation therapy to this tumor entity, where it is used as a primary treatment or, more commonly, as an adjunct therapy. We also provide an overview of the use of fractionated radiation therapy for the preservation of hearing and facial function, and dosing and other technical considerations, in light of the indolent natural history of vestibular schwannomas. We also discuss potential risks associated with this treatment modality, including its effects on temporal bone structures and cranial nerves among other possible complications. Lastly, we outline future directions in this rapidly evolving segment of vestibular schwannoma therapy, which has benefited from the advent of intensity-modulated radiation therapy coupled with stereotactic localization.

Clinical evaluation of CyberKnife in the treatment of vestibular schwannomas

Objective. This study assessed the posttreatment tumor control and auditory function of vestibular schwannoma (VS) patients after CyberKnife (CK) and analyzed the possible prognostic factors of hearing loss. Methods. We retrospectively studied 117 VS patients, with Gardner-Robertson (GR) classification grades I to IV, who underwent CK between 2006 and 2012. Data including radiosurgery treatment parameters, pre- and postoperative tumor size, and auditory function were collected and examined. Results. With CK, 117 patients had excellent tumor control rates (99.1%), with a mean imaging followup of 61.1 months. Excluding 52 patients (GR III-IV pretreatment), 53 (81.5%) of the remaining 65 patients (initial GR I-II) maintained GR I or II hearing after CK, with a mean audiometric followup of 64.5 months. Twelve patients experienced hearing degradation (91.6% were GR II pretreatment); they appeared to have significantly larger tumor sizes, significantly smaller cochlear sizes, and higher prescribed cochlear doses, compared to the patients with preserved hearing. Conclusion. Our data showed that CK treatment provided an excellent tumor control rate and a comparable hearing preservation rate in VS patients. Patients with pretreatment GR II hearing levels, larger tumor volumes, smaller cochlear sizes, and higher prescribed cochlear doses may have poor hearing prognoses.

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for acoustic neuromas: long-term outcomes

AIMS

Acoustic neuromas are rare, benign intracranial tumours. There are a variety of treatment options, with no clear optimal management strategy and wide variation in treated outcomes. We report the outcomes from a 15 year cohort of patients treated at our centre using fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (52.5 Gy in 25 fractions).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analysed a retrospective case series. Patients were identified from patient records and a retrospective review of case notes and imaging reports was undertaken. We assessed tumour response using RECIST criteria and recorded toxicity. Progression-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The study was conducted according to the STROBE guidelines.

RESULTS

In total, 93 patients were identified; 83 patients had follow-up data, with a median follow-up period of 5.7 years. The overall control rate using RECIST criteria was 92%. Data on complications were available for 90 patients, with six (7%) experiencing a reduction in hearing, one (1%) developing trigeminal nerve dysfunction and one (1%) a deterioration in facial nerve function. Other toxicities included four (4%) patients who developed hydrocephalus, requiring the placement of a shunt and one (1%) patient who developed radiation brainstem necrosis. After further evaluation this patient was deemed to have been treated within acceptable dose constraints.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that a good control rate of acoustic neuromas is achievable using fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy to a dose of 52.5 Gy in 25 fractions. Toxicity is considered acceptable but the episode of radiation brainstem necrosis remains of concern and is the subject of further work.

Salvage surgery of vestibular schwannoma after failed radiotherapy: the Gruppo Otologico experience and review of the literature

OBJECTIVES

The use of radiation therapy has largely widespread and becomes in many centers the preference modality of treatment for symptomatic patients who are old, medically unfit for surgical therapy, those who refuse surgery and in some recurrent or residual growing tumors. The risk of radiotherapy failure in the treatment of vestibular schwannoma might be underestimated in the literature. The purpose of this study is to show the Gruppo Otologico experience with salvage surgery to better understand the surgical outcomes and difficulties in treating vestibular schwannoma after failed radiotherapy.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review of patients who required salvage surgery of vestibular schwannoma after failed radiotherapy.

SETTINGS

Quaternary referral otology and skull base center.

RESULTS

Between 1987 and 2010, 2500 cases of VS underwent surgical treatment at the Gruppo Otologico. Nineteen patients had received stereotactic radiation therapy before the surgical treatment. The interval time between radiotherapy and surgical salvage ranged from 1 to 10 years. In all the cases decision of surgery was taken following an increase in tumor size with or without new onset of symptoms. Complete tumor removal was achieved in 86.6% of the cases through a transotic, transcochlear or enlarged translabyrinthine approach with trans-apical extension. Difficult dissection of the tumor was encountered in 93.3% the cases. The facial nerve was anatomically preserved in 93.3% but its function was worsened in 73.3% of patients after at least 6 months of follow up. Malignant transformation of the vestibular schwannoma was encountered in one patient.

CONCLUSION

Complete surgical resection of VS is more difficult after radiotherapy with relatively poor facial nerve outcomes and nearly impossible hearing preservation. Patients who receive radiation therapy for the treatment of vestibular schwannoma should be made aware of its potential complications and risk of failure, especially in young patients and NF2 cases.

An update on unilateral sporadic small vestibular schwannoma

Advances in neuroimaging have increased the detection rate of small vestibular schwannomas (VSs, maximum diameter < 25 mm). Current management modalities include observation with serial imaging, stereotactic radiosurgery, and microsurgical resection. Selecting one approach over another invites speculation, and no standard management consensus has been established. Moreover, there is a distinct clinical heterogeneity among patients harboring small VSs, making standardization of management difficult. The aim of this article is to guide treating physicians toward the most plausible therapeutic option based on etiopathogenesis and the highest level of existing evidence specific to the different cohorts of hypothetical case scenarios. Hypothetical cases were created to represent 5 commonly encountered scenarios involving patients with sporadic unilateral small VSs, and the literature was reviewed with a focus on small VS. The authors extrapolated from the data to the hypothetical case scenarios, and based on the level of evidence, they discuss the most suitable patient-specific treatment strategies. They conclude that observation and imaging, stereotactic radiosurgery, and microsurgery are all important components of the management strategy. Each has unique advantages and disadvantages best suited to certain clinical scenarios. The treatment of small VS should always be tailored to the clinical, personal, and social requirements of an individual patient, and a rigid treatment protocol is not practical.

Current strategies in management of intracanalicular vestibular schwannoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The current practitioner is more often managing intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas than in the past, as improved imaging and heightened awareness leads to earlier diagnosis of these tumors. The role of observation, microsurgery, and radiation treatment in the management of intracanalicular tumors continues to evolve. The goal of this article is to evaluate and summarize recent literature pertaining to the management of intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas.

RECENT FINDINGS

Watchful waiting is an important management option for patients with minimal symptoms. The literature on the natural history of small vestibular schwannomas continues to expand, with particular emphasis on the expected hearing outcomes. Microsurgical techniques also focus on hearing preservation. Presence of fundal fluid and good or normal hearing preoperatively are positive predictors of hearing preservation after surgery. Long-term follow-up after radiation therapy for vestibular schwannomas continues to demonstrate excellent tumor control rates, although hearing preservation rates are modest.

SUMMARY

Multiple factors, including status of hearing, presence of vestibular symptoms, patient age, medical comorbidities, institutional outcomes, and patient preferences, help determine the management strategy for patients with an intracanalicular vestibular schwannoma.

Radiation therapy and radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas: indications, techniques, and results

This article describes in detail the uses of and distinctions between stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for vestibular schwannoma (VS). The authors discuss devices and techniques used in SRS and SRT and, additionally, present readers the approach used by surgeons at Mayo Clinic. They discuss indications and results for both approaches in patients with vestibular schwannoma. Treatment of small and large tumors is discussed, along with cystic tumors and NF2-associated VS. Repeating SRS for vestibular schwannoma is also mentioned.