Mechanical thrombectomy for recurrent large vessel occlusion

Reocclusion after successful endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Endovascular treatment (EVT) is the standard of care for selected patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO).

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the available data on: (1) incidence, predictors, and outcomes of patients with reocclusion after successful EVT for AIS and, (2) the characteristics, complications, and outcomes of patients with reocclusion treated with repeated EVT (rEVT) within 30 days of the first procedure.

METHODS

PubMed was searched (between January 2012 and April 2021) to identify studies reporting reocclusion following successful EVT (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction ≥2b) in patients with AIS due to LVO. Pooled incidence of reocclusion per 100 patients with successful recanalization following EVT was calculated using a random-effects model with Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. Extracted incidences of reocclusion according to etiology and use of intravenous thrombolysis were pooled using random-effects meta-analytic models.

RESULTS

A total of 840 studies was identified and seven studies qualified for the quantitative analysis, which described 91 same-vessel reocclusions occurring within the first 7 days after treatment among 2067 patients (4.9%; 95% CI 3% to 7%, I2=70.2%). Large vessel atherosclerosis was associated with an increased risk of reocclusion (OR=3.44, 95% CI 1.12 to 10.61, I2=50%). We identified 90 patients treated with rEVT for recurrent LVO, described in five studies. The rates of procedural complications, mortality, and unfavorable functional outcome at 3 months were 18.0%, 18.9%, and 60.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In cohorts of patients with AIS due to LVO, 5% of patients experienced reocclusion within 7 days after successful EVT. Repeated EVT can be a safe and effective treatment for selected patients with reocclusion.

Laterality of previous stoke affects endovascular thrombectomy outcomes

BACKGROUND

Investigations into the effect of previous stroke on thrombectomy outcomes have yielded conflicting results, and are limited by small sample sizes. We present the results of a large single center retrospective study aimed at investigating the effect of chronic stroke laterality on thrombectomy outcomes.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database was queried for all thrombectomy cases conducted between December 2014 and January 2020, and patient imaging was prospectively reviewed for evidence of prior supratentorial infarction. Procedural, clinical, and demographic characteristics were recorded, and good clinical outcome was defined as a 90 day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of <2 or mRS score unchanged if baseline was >2.

RESULTS

The final analysis cohort included 555 patients, 79 of whom were found to have radiographic evidence of prior chronic infarcts. On univariate analysis, patients with any chronic supratentorial infarct achieved a lower rate of good clinical outcome than patients with no chronic infarct (22.8% vs 41.0%, p=0.0021). With regard to subgroups, this difference remained only in patients with ipsilateral (14.3%, p=0.0018) and bilateral (11.8%, p=0.015) lesions. Patients with chronic contralateral supratentorial infarcts were no less likely to achieve good outcomes (40.7%, p=0.98). After multivariate regression controlling for age, sex, and baseline mRS, chronic ipsilateral infarcts (OR 0.22, CI 0.07 to 0.67) and chronic bilateral infarcts (OR 0.19, CI 0.04 to 0.85) were the only independent predictors of poor outcome in endovascular thrombectomy patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In this single center retrospective study of thrombectomy patients with chronic supratentorial infarcts, the laterality of the previous stroke significantly affected the likelihood of good clinical outcomes.

Repeated mechanical thrombectomy for recurrent large vessel occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the standard treatment for acute large vessel occlusion (LVO). Recurrent LVO can still occur in patients who already underwent MT for the first LVO. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of repeating MT for recurrent LVO.

METHODS

This meta-analysis of the available literature was conducted to summarize the current evidence regarding repeated MT outcomes in patients with recurrent LVO. All studies with ≥ 1 outcomes of interest were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used for risk of bias assessment.

RESULTS

Twenty studies, 10 observational (n = 21,251 patients) and 10 case reports (n = 10 patients), were included. 266 patients (62.78% females) with recurrent LVO were identified, with an overall prevalence of 1.6% and a mean age of 65.67 ± 16.23 years. Cardio-embolism was the most common mechanism in both times, with a median of 15 days between the first and second LVOs. Compared with pre-intervention, the first and second MTs significantly reduced the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, (mean difference (MD) = -8.91) and (MD = -5.97) respectively, with a significant difference (p = 0.001). The rate of favorable outcome (modified Rankin scale (mRS) score 0-3) was 82.6% and 59.2% after the first and second MTs respectively, with a significant difference (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In properly selected recurrent LVO patients, repeated MT is efficacious and safe. A prior MT procedure should not discourage aggressive treatment as many patients may achieve favorable outcomes.

Repeated reperfusion treatment in recurrent ischemic stroke: A retrospective single-center case series

Data regarding repeated reperfusion therapy (rRT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), including intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular treatment (EVT), are quite poor. To date, there are only few case reports and five larger studies on repeated EVT. We aimed to report our single-center experience and describe different clinical scenarios of recurrent AIS with emergent large vessel occlusion (LVO), for which the decision-making process could be challenging in the emergency setting. We retrospectively reviewed 765 consecutive AIS patients with LVO, who underwent reperfusion procedures at our comprehensive stroke center, from 2014 to 2020, and identified rRT patients. We identified and reviewed the medical records of eight patients (1.05%), who repeated reperfusive treatment for recurrent stroke within 30 days (early arterial reocclusion, EAR) and after 30 days (late arterial reocclusion, LAR). We assigned collected data to three clinical scenarios, each divided into EAR and LAR cases. All patients had recurrent emergent LVO in the same vessel territory previously affected, both in EAR and LAR patients. A good clinical outcome has been achieved in EAR patients (modified Rankin Score ≤ 2). Artery-to-artery embolic mechanism was more common in the EAR group, while LAR was more frequently associated with cardioembolic source. RRT appears to be an effective treatment option for recurrent LVO, and it should not be withheld in carefully selected patients. EVT should be considered, including aspiration-only and stenting procedures in patients with AIS and recurrent LVO after previous reperfusive treatments, even after a very short time.

Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Analysis of the STRATIS Registry, Systematic Review, and Meta-Analysis

Background: The indications for mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke continue to broaden, leading neurointerventionalists to treat vessel occlusions at increasingly distal locations farther in time from stroke onset. Accessing these smaller vessels raises the concern of iatrogenic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) owing to increasing complexity in device navigation and retrieval. This study aims to determine the prevalence of SAH following mechanical thrombectomy, associated predictors, and resulting functional outcomes using a multicenter registry and compare this with a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Methods: Data from STRATIS (The Systematic Evaluation of Patients Treated with Neurothrombectomy Devices for Acute Ischemic Stroke) registry were analyzed dichotomized by the presence or absence of SAH after thrombectomy. Only patients with 24-h post-procedural neuroimaging were included (n = 841). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify significant predictors of SAH. A systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis was also conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) protocol. Results: The prevalence of post-thrombectomy SAH was 5.23% in STRATIS with 15.9% (1.84% overall) experiencing neurological decline. Distal location of vessel occlusion (OR 3.41 [95% CI: 1.75-6.63], p < 0.001) and more than 3 device passes (OR 1.34 [95% CI: 1.09-1.64], p = 0.01) were associated with a higher probability of SAH in contrast to a reduction with administration of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) (OR 0.48 [95% CI: 0.26-0.89], p = 0.02). There was a trend toward a higher discharge NIHSS (8.3 ± 8.7 vs. 5.3 ± 6.6, p = 0.07) with a significantly reduced proportion achieving functional independence at 90 days (modified Rankin Score 0-2: 32.5% vs. 57.8%, p = 0.002) in SAH patients. Pooled analysis of 10,126 patients from 6 randomized controlled trials and 64 observational studies demonstrated a prevalence of 5.85% [95% CI: 4.51-7.34%, I ²: 85.2%]. Only location of vessel occlusion was significant for increased odds of SAH at distal sites (OR 2.89 [95% CI: 1.14, 7.35]). Conclusions: Iatrogenic SAH related to mechanical thrombectomy is more common with treatment of distally-situated occlusions and multiple device passes. While low in overall prevalence, its effect is not benign with fewer patients reaching post-procedural functional independence, particularly if symptomatic.

A Case of Successful Intravenous Thrombolysis Bridged with Repeated Endovascular Treatment in Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion

Acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is a neurological emergency that has a high rate of mortality and poor functional outcome. Endovascular therapy (ET) is the gold standard therapy for large vessel occlusion stroke of the anterior circulation. Whether ET can also be effectively and safely performed in early recurrent large vessel occlusion, especially in BAO, is unclear. We describe a case of successful recanalization and independent functional outcome of a BAO patient treated with intravenous thrombolysis combined with repeated ET. The patients was a 32-year-old man with a history of heavy smoking and drinking who presented to the Emergency Department with dizziness and hypertension, and progressed over the next 13 h to left hemiparesis and mild dysarthria with an NIHSS score of 7. CT angiography demonstrated occlusion of the proximal basilar artery (BA). Intravenous alteplase was given followed by ET. The first intervention failed and over the next 8 h, the patient's NIHSS score increased to 12. A second attempt with balloon angioplasty managed to reconstitute arterial blood flow with a severe residual stenosis of the proximal BA. Subsequently, the patient progressed into deep coma with reocclusion of the BA demonstrated on transcranial Doppler. A third intervention with emergent stenting resulted in complete recanalization of the BA and excellent neurological recovery. This patient received three endovascular treatments within 24 h due to reocclusion of the BA and achieved good outcomes. In conclusion, repeated ET for early recurrent BAO is feasible in carefully selected patients.

Repeated Endovascular Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke in a Single Center

BACKGROUND

Patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy may be treated with repeat endovascular thrombectomy (rEVT) in case of recurrent large vessel occlusion (LVO). The purpose of this study is to report the frequency, timing, and outcomes of rEVT in a single center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our databases for anterior or posterior circulation rEVT cases. Patient characteristics, procedural data, and functional outcomes (modified Rankin scale at 90 days) were analyzed. Early and late recurrence of stroke was divided at 30 days.

RESULTS

Of 1025 patients treated between January 2011 and January 2020, 23 (2.2%) underwent rEVT. The median time between the first and second procedure was 185 days; 7 (30.4%) patients were re-treated within 30 days. Eleven patients (47.8%) had different occlusion sites between the two procedures. Good clinical outcome of patients with late ipsilateral recurrence was significantly higher than that of patients with late contralateral recurrence (83.3% vs. 16.7, p = 0.027). Overall good functional outcome after the second procedure was 43.5% (10/23). Overall good functional outcome of early and late recurrence groups were similar (57.1% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.650). One patient died due to an underlying cardiac problem.

CONCLUSION

rEVT can be performed in patients with recurrent stroke of LVO. Ipsilateral recurrence of stroke was associated with good clinical outcome after rEVT.

Repeated mechanical thrombectomy in short-term large vessel occlusion recurrence: multicenter study and systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Data on the frequency and outcome of repeated mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with short-term re-occlusion of intracranial vessels is limited. Addressing this subject, we report our multicenter experience with a systematic review of the literature.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of consecutive acute stroke patients treated with MT repeatedly within 30 days at 10 tertiary care centers between January 2007 and January 2020. Baseline demographics, etiology of stroke, angiographic outcome and clinical outcome evaluated by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days were noted. Additionally, a systematic review of reports with repeated MT due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) recurrence was performed.

RESULTS

We identified 30 out of 7844 (0.4%) patients who received two thrombectomy procedures within 30 days due to recurrent LVO. Through systematic review, three publications of 28 participants met the criteria for inclusion. Combined, a total of 58 participants were analyzed: cardioembolic events were the most common etiology for the first (65.5%) and second LVO (60.3%), respectively. Median baseline NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) was 13 (IQR 8-16) before the first MT and 15 (IQR 11-19) before the second MT (p=0.031). Successful reperfusion was achieved in 91.4% after the first MT and in 86.2% patients after the second MT (p=0.377). The rate of functional independence (mRS 0-2) was 46% at 90 days after the second procedure.

CONCLUSION

Repeated MT in short-term recurrent LVO is a rarity but appears to be safe and effective. The second thrombectomy should be pursued with the same extensive effort as the first procedure as these patients may achieve similar good outcomes.

Endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke in patients with recurrent intracranial large vessel occlusion

BACKGROUND

Data on the treatment with recurrent mechanical thrombectomy of patients with acute ischemic stroke with recurrent large vessel occlusion are limited. We report our experience with recurrent mechanical thrombectomy for recurrent large vessel occlusion.

METHODS

During the period between May 2013 and August 2018, data on patients with recurrent large vessel occlusion were collected. Baseline clinical characteristics, recanalization technique, recanalization rates and clinical outcomes of patients with recurrent large vessel occlusion treated with mechanical thrombectomy were analyzed. Patients with recurrent large vessel occlusion treated with mechanical thrombectomy were compared with patients who underwent single mechanical thrombectomy.

RESULTS

During the study period, 7 of 474 patients (1.5%) were treated with mechanical thrombectomy for recurrent large vessel occlusion. The mean age of these patients was 64.4 (±7.9) years, and the mean time interval between thrombectomies was 47 (±48) h. The median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was 12 (range 5-24) before the first and 20 (range 3-34) before the second procedure; the mean NIHSS at discharge was 5 (range 2-25). Good clinical outcome after repeated mechanical thrombectomy defined as modified Rankin scale of 0-2 was achieved in 29% of patients at three months of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat mechanical thrombectomy is a rare procedure, but appears to be a feasible, safe and effective treatment option in patients with acute ischemic stroke and early recurrent large vessel occlusion.

Repeated Endovascular Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

Background and Purpose—

Patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy may be treated with repeat endovascular thrombectomy (rEVT) in case of recurrent large vessel occlusion. Data on safety and efficacy of these interventions is scarce. Our aim is to report on frequency, timing, and outcome of rEVT in a large nation-wide multicenter registry.

Methods—

In the Netherlands, all patients with endovascular thrombectomy have been registered since 2002 (MR CLEAN Pretrial registry, MR CLEAN Trial [Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands], and MR CLEAN Registry). We retrospectively reviewed these databases for anterior circulation rEVT cases. Patient characteristics, procedural data, and functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale at 90 days) were analyzed.

Results—

Of 3928 patients treated between 2002 and 2017, 27 (0.7%) underwent rEVT. Median time between first and second procedure was 78 (1–1122) days; 11/27 patients were re-treated within 30 days. Cardioembolism was the most common etiology (18 patients [67%]). In 19 patients (70%), recurrent occlusion occurred ipsilateral to previous occlusion. At 90 days after rEVT procedure, 44% of the patients had achieved functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2), and 33% had died. Adverse events were 2/27 (7.4%) intracranial hemorrhage, 1/27 (3.7%) stroke progression, and 1/27 (3.7%) pneumonia.

Conclusions—

In this large nationwide cohort of patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy, rEVT was rare. Stroke cause was mainly cardio-embolic, and most recurrent large vessel occlusions in which rEVT was performed occurred ipsilateral. Although there probably is a selection bias on repeated treatment in case of recurrent large vessel occlusion, rEVT appears safe, with similar outcome as in single-treated cases.

Etiology of recurrent large vessel occlusions treated with repeated thrombectomy

BACKGROUND

Repeated mechanical thrombectomy for acute stroke treatment in individual patients has been proven feasible. However, less is known about the etiology of recurrent vessel occlusions after prior thrombectomy. We aimed to understand if the etiology of such recurrent events differs from the first stroke.

METHODS

Retrospectively, we identified all patients at our center who received a repeated mechanical thrombectomy between 2007 and 2019. Clinical data were retrieved from medical records. Etiology of stroke was evaluated retrospectively, and angiographic studies were revisited.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients (1.5%) were identified. Median age was 68 years (IQR 56-77). Median NIHSS at first admission was 11 points (IQR 5-15). In nine cases (39.1%), the recurrent vessel occlusion was located exactly at the same position as the prior occlusion. Overall, five (21.7%) patients had a remarkable extracranial pathology as likely cause of stroke recurrence. In 16 patients (69.6%), the etiology of the first stroke and its recurrence was considered as likely being the same, mostly of cardioembolic or unknown origin. In the seven remaining patients (30.4%), the cause of stroke possibly differed from the first event, with five patients (21.7%) having a postinterventional intracranial intimal lesion as possible cause of stroke.

CONCLUSION

Incidence of repeated thrombectomy was low. However, the high number of patients with known origin of stroke etiology raises the question how their monitoring may be optimized. The number of patients with remarkable extracranial pathologies or intracranial endothelial lesions supports current clinical practice to pay attention to final angiographic series.