Pain control after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A contemporary literature review

Pharmacotherapy in SAH: Clinical Trial Lessons

Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (SAH) is a medical emergency with potentially devastating outcomes. It is without doubt that over the past decades, there has been a radical change in the approach towards patients with SAH, both in terms of the surgical as well as of the pharmacological treatments offered. The present review aims to outline the principal data regarding the best practice in the pharmacotherapy of SAH, as well as to sum up the emerging evidence from the latest clinical trials. To date, nimodipine is the only evidence-based treatment of vasospasm. However, extensive research is currently underway to identify novel substances with magnesium sulphate, cilostazol, clazosentan and fasudil, demonstrating promising results. Antifibrinolytic therapy could help reduce mortality, and anticoagulants, in spite of their associated hazards, could actually reduce the incidence of delayed cerebral ischemia. The effectiveness of triple-H therapy has been challenged, yet evidence on the optimal regimen is still pending. Statins may benefit some patients by reducing the incidence of vasospasm and delayed ischemic events. As several clinical trials are underway, it is expected that in the years to come, more therapeutic options will be added to the attending physician's armamentarium.

Evaluating analgesic medications utilized in the treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and association with delayed cerebral ischemia

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) recovery may be hampered by delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). Herein, we sought to identify whether frequently administered medications in the intensive care unit (ICU) are associated with DCI.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients admitted to a tertiary care center neuro-ICU between 2012 and 2019 with aSAH who could verbalize pain intensity scores were included. Medication dosages and clinical characteristics were abstracted from the medical record. Both paired and unpaired analyses were utilized to measure individual DCI risk for a given patient in relation to drug dosages.

RESULTS

119 patients were included; average age was 61.7 ± 15.2 (SD) years, 89 (74.7%) were female, and 32 (26.9%) experienced DCI during admission. Patients with DCI had longer length of stay (19.3 ± 7.4 vs 12.7 ± 5.3 days, p < 0.0001). The combination medication of acetaminophen 325 mg/butalbital 50 mg/caffeine 40 mg (A/B/C) was associated with decreased DCI on paired (2.3 ± 2.0 vs 3.1 ± 1.9 tabs, p = 0.034) and unpaired analysis (1.84 ± 2.4 vs 2.6 ± 2.4 tabs, p < 0.001). No associations were found between DCI and opioids, dexamethasone, levetiracetam, or acetaminophen. Max and mean daily headache pain was not associated with DCI occurrence.

CONCLUSION

We identified an association between a commonly administered analgesic and DCI. A/B/C is associated with decreased DCI in this study, while other medications are not associated with DCI risk.

Steroids Provide Temporary Improvement of Refractory Pain Following Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Introduction

Evidence for optimal analgesia following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is limited. Steroid therapy for pain refractory to standard regimens is common despite lack of evidence for its efficacy. We sought to determine if steroids reduced pain or utilization of other analgesics when given for refractory headache following SAH.

Methods

We performed a retrospective within-subjects cohort study of SAH patients who received steroids for refractory headache. We compared daily pain scores, total daily opioid, and acetaminophen doses before, during, and after steroids. Repeated measures were analyzed with a multivariable general linear model and generalized estimating equations.

Results

Included 52 patients treated with dexamethasone following SAH, of whom 11 received a second course, increasing total to 63 treatment epochs. Mean pain score on the first day of therapy was 7.92 (standard error of the mean [SEM] .37) and decreased to 6.68 (SEM .36) on the second day before quickly returning to baseline levels, 7.36 (SEM .33), following completion of treatment. Total daily analgesics mirrored this trend. Mean total opioid and acetaminophen doses on days one and two and two days after treatment were 47.83mg (SEM 6.22) and 1848mg (SEM 170.66), 34.24mg (SEM 5.12) and 1809mg (SEM 150.28), and 46.38mg (SEM 11.64) and 1833mg (SEM 174.23), respectively. Response to therapy was associated with older age, decreasing acetaminophen dosing, and longer duration of steroids. Hyperglycemia and sleep disturbance/delirium effected 28.6% and 55.6% of cases, respectively.

Conclusion

Steroid therapy for refractory pain in SAH patients may have modest, transient effects in select patients.

The endogenous neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide after spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage–A potential psychoactive prognostic serum biomarker of pain-associated neuropsychological symptoms

Background

The pronociceptive neuromediator calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is associated with pain transmission and modulation. After spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (sSAH), the vasodilatory CGRP is excessively released into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum and modulates psycho-behavioral function. In CSF, the hypersecretion of CGRP subacutely after good-grade sSAH was significantly correlated with an impaired health-related quality of life (hrQoL). Now, we prospectively analyzed the treatment-specific differences in the secretion of endogenous CGRP into serum after good-grade sSAH and its impact on hrQoL.

Methods

Twenty-six consecutive patients (f:m = 13:8; mean age 50.6 years) with good-grade sSAH were enrolled (drop out n = 5): n = 9 underwent endovascular aneurysm occlusion, n = 6 microsurgery, and n = 6 patients with perimesencephalic SAH received standardized intensive medical care. Plasma was drawn daily from day 1 to 10, at 3 weeks, and at the 6-month follow-up (FU). CGRP levels were determined with competitive enzyme immunoassay in duplicate serum samples. All patients underwent neuropsychological self-report assessment after the onset of sSAH (t₁: day 11–35) and at the FU (t₂).

Results

During the first 10 days, the mean CGRP levels in serum (0.470 ± 0.10 ng/ml) were significantly lower than the previously analyzed mean CGRP values in CSF (0.662 ± 0.173; p = 0.0001). The mean serum CGRP levels within the first 10 days did not differ significantly from the values at 3 weeks (p = 0.304). At 6 months, the mean serum CGRP value (0.429 ± 0.121 ng/ml) was significantly lower compared to 3 weeks (p = 0.010) and compared to the first 10 days (p = 0.026). Higher mean serum CGRP levels at 3 weeks (p = 0.001) and at 6 months (p = 0.005) correlated with a significantly poorer performance in the item pain, and, at 3 weeks, with a higher symptom burden regarding somatoform syndrome (p = 0.001) at t₂.

Conclusion

Our study reveals the first insight into the serum levels of endogenous CGRP in good-grade sSAH patients with regard to hrQoL. In serum, upregulated CGRP levels at 3 weeks and 6 months seem to be associated with a poorer mid-term hrQoL in terms of pain. In migraineurs, CGRP receptor antagonists have proven clinical efficacy. Our findings corroborate the potential capacity of CGRP in pain processing.

Managing Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Precipitated by Anesthesia-assisted Rapid Opioid Detoxification: A Case Report

INTRODUCTION

Anesthesia-assisted rapid opioid detoxification (AAROD) is a controversial method of treating opioid dependence that involves sedating patients during a period of provoked withdrawal. Reported adverse outcomes of the procedure demonstrate the importance of recognizing the potential complications of AAROD.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a case of a 41-year-old male presenting with a subarachnoid hemorrhage following an AAROD procedure.

CONCLUSION

This case report and discussion reviews the pathophysiology of opioid withdrawal syndrome, potential complications following AAROD, and important management considerations.

Ultra-Early Induction of General Anesthesia for Reducing Rebleeding Rates in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

Rebleeding of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is one of the significant risk factors for poor clinical outcome. The rebleeding risk is the highest during the acute phase with an approximate rebleeding rate of 9-17% within the first 24 h. Theoretically, general anesthesia can stabilize a patient's vital signs; however, its effectiveness as initial management for preventing post-aSAH rebleeding remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and safety of ultra-early general anesthesia induction for reducing the rebleeding rates among patients with aSAH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients with aSAH who were admitted to our department between January 2013 and December 2019. All the patients underwent ultra-early general anesthesia induction as initial management regardless of their severity. We evaluated the rebleeding rate before definitive treatment, factors influencing rebleeding, and general anesthesia complications.

RESULTS

We included 191 patients with two-third of them having a poor clinical grade (World Federation of Neurological Society [WFNS] grade IV or V). The median duration from admission to general anesthesia induction was 22 min. Rebleeding before definitive treatment occurred in nine patients (4.7%). There were significant differences in the Glasgow Coma Scale score (p = 0.047), WFNS grade (p = 0.02), and dissecting aneurysm (p <0.001) between the rebleeding and non-rebleeding patients. There were no cases of unsuccessful tracheal intubation or rebleeding during general anesthesia induction.

CONCLUSION

Ultra-early general anesthesia induction could be performed safely in patients with aSAH, regardless of the WFNS grade; moreover, it resulted in lower rebleeding rate than that reported in previous epidemiological reports.

A Qualitative Study of Nurses' Perceptions of Narcotic Administration after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Nearly every patient admitted to a neuroscience intensive care unit (ICU) will experience pain and nurses are tasked with analgesic administration. Within the setting of the ongoing opioid epidemic it is not well understood how nurses meet the need to alleviate pain while individualizing analgesic administration.

AIMS

This qualitative study used a phenomenological approach to determine nurses' perceptions in pain management of patientswith subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).

DESIGN

Prospective qualitative inquiry using phenomenology SETTING: The study was conducted in a neuroscience intensive care unit at a university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Nine neuroscience intensive care unit nurses were enrolled using snowball sampling.

METHODS

Saturation was reached after nine individual nurse interviews. Hermeneutic cycling analysis was used throughout interviews and codes and themes were developed throughout the interview process. Rigor was established using triangulation, rich and thick descriptions, and member checks.

RESULTS

Emerging themes included discernment and hesitation. Discernment is supported by codes such as: "nursing judgement" and "follow the orders." Hesitation is supported by codes such as "clouded exam" and "over sedation." Eight nurses made references to hesitation of administering opioids due to the perception that it would cause a poorer neurological exam. All nurses described a reliance on education, experience, or intuition to guide their decision to administer opioids along with using approved pain scales. Themes were confirmed by member checks, which prompted slight modifications to coding.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this study support that nurses do express apprehension in administering opioids to patients with (SAH). This apprehension leads to hesitation to administer the medication and a thought out discernment process.

Effectiveness of Low-Dose Intravenous Fentanyl for Postoperative Headache Management After Neck Clipping of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

After subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), headache management is often difficult owing to the need to use multiple analgesic drugs. Fentanyl is an opioid we can use after surgery, and it can decrease pain post SAH. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of fentanyl for management of headache after SAH.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients who underwent surgical clipping for ruptured intracranial aneurysms and complained of severe headache after the surgery were enrolled. Among them, 9 patients were given fentanyl combined with other analgesic drugs. The numeric rating scale score and dietary intake were measured in the acute phase after the SAH.

RESULTS

The numeric rating scale scores were significantly lower in the fentanyl (+) group. The maximum numeric rating scale decreased to <5 points within 16.5 ± 2.9 days in the fentanyl (-) group and within 12.0 ± 2.6 days in the fentanyl (+) group. The median numeric rating scale decreased to <5 points over 14.0 ± 4.2 days in the fentanyl (-) group and >7.7 ± 3.8 days in the fentanyl (+) group. At day 14, the fentanyl (+) group showed significantly better dietary intake than that of the fentanyl (-) group.

CONCLUSIONS

Using fentanyl after surgical clipping for ruptured intracranial aneurysms might decrease headache and produce few adverse effects. Adequate headache control showed improved dietary intake after SAH.