Prospective randomized placebo-controlled double-blind clinical study of adjuvant dexamethasone with surgery for chronic subdural haematoma with post-operative subdural drainage: Interim analysis

The efficacy and safety of the internal medication therapy of the triple drugs for chronic subdural hematoma: Retrospective analysis

The recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) after surgical treatment is a severe problem with no effective prevention method. This retrospective study aimed to investigate factors associated with CSDH recurrence after burr hole surgery and hematoma changes on computed tomography before surgery to examine prevention methods for recurrence. A total of 166 hematomas were enrolled in this study, with 139 patients undergoing burr hole surgery for CSDH. Among these patients, 17 (12 %) had recurrence. Propensity score matching was performed based on postoperative drug therapy, including goreisan, carbazochrome sodium sulfonate hydrate, and tranexamic aid, resulting in 39 matched cases in 0-2 and 3 drug therapy groups. The recurrence rates were 18 % for the 0-2-drug therapy group and 3 % for the 3-drug therapy group. Univariate analysis revealed that the use of 0-2 drugs was associated with a higher risk of CSDH recurrence (odds ratio [OR], 8.31; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.97-71.17; p = 0.05) compared to the use of 3 drugs. Multivariate regression analysis further confirmed that 0-2 drug therapy after surgery was associated with an increased risk of CSDH recurrence (OR, 11.06; 95 % CI, 1.16-105.4; p = 0.037). Additionally, 36 hematomas were evaluated before surgery, with hematoma changes such as lower density and new trabecular formation detected in 14 CSDHs (39 %). Multivariate regression analysis showed that 3-drug therapy was associated with more cases of hematoma change than 0-2-drug therapy (OR, 13.9; 95 % CI, 1.09-177.65; p = 0.043). The 3-drug therapy was effective in reducing the recurrence of hematoma after burr hole surgery and promoted hematoma thrombosis.

Randomized Clinical Trials in Cerebrovascular Neurosurgery From 2018 to 2022

There has been an exponential increase in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on cerebrovascular disease within neurosurgery. The goal of this study was to review, outline the scope, and summarize all phase 2b and phase 3 RCTs impacting cerebrovascular neurosurgery practice since 2018. We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases for relevant RCTs published between January 1, 2018, and July 1, 2022. We searched for studies related to eight major cerebrovascular disorders relevant to neurosurgery, including acute ischemic stroke, cerebral aneurysms and subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, subdural hematomas, cerebral venous thrombosis, arteriovenous malformations, Moyamoya disease and extracranial-intracranial bypass, and carotid and intracranial atherosclerosis. We limited our search to phase 2b or 3 RCTs related to cerebrovascular disorders published during the study period. The titles and abstracts of all relevant studies meeting our search criteria were included. Pediatric studies, stroke studies related to rehabilitation or cardiovascular disease, study protocols without published results, prospective cohort studies, registry studies, cluster randomized trials, and nonrandomized pivotal trials were excluded.  From an initial total of 2,797 records retrieved from the database searches, 1,641 records were screened after duplicates and studies outside of our time period were removed. After screening, 511 available reports within our time period of interest were assessed for eligibility. Pediatric studies, stroke studies related to rehabilitation or cardiovascular disease, study protocols without published results, prospective cohort studies, registry studies, cluster randomized trials, and nonrandomized pivotal trials were excluded. We found 80 unique phase 2b or 3 RCTs that fit our criteria, with 165 topic-relevant articles published within the study period.  Numerous RCTs in cerebrovascular neurosurgery have been published since 2018. Ischemic stroke, including mechanical thrombectomy and thrombolysis, accounted for a majority of publications, but there were large trials in intracerebral hemorrhage, subdural hemorrhage, aneurysms, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and cerebral venous thrombosis, among others. This review helps define the scope of the large RCTs published in the last four years to guide future research and clinical care.

Efficacy and safety of steroids for chronic subdural hematoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a condition characterized by the accumulation of fluid, blood, and blood breakdown products between the brain's arachnoid and dura mater coverings. While steroids have been explored as a potential treatment option, their efficacy and safety remain uncertain. This meta-analysis and systematic review aimed to assess the impact of steroids on CSDH management, including mortality, recurrence, complications, and functional outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive literature search in major electronic databases up to June 2023, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews and Interventions. Inclusion criteria encompassed adult patients with CSDH, the use of steroids as monotherapy or adjuvant therapy, and clearly defined outcomes. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies meeting these criteria were included in the study.

Results

The initial search yielded 4315 articles, with 12 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Our findings indicate a non-significant trend toward reduced mortality with steroids in combination with standard care (Odds ratios [OR] = 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-2.18). However, substantial heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 70%). Sensitivity analysis, excluding influential studies, suggested a potential increased mortality risk associated with steroids (OR = 1.47, 95% CI 0.87-2.48). Steroids showed a possible benefit in reducing the recurrence of CSDH (OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.20-1.67), but with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 89%). No clear advantage of steroids was observed in terms of functional outcomes at three months (modified Rankin scale scores). Furthermore, steroids were associated with a significantly higher incidence of adverse effects and complications (OR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.48-3.17).

Conclusion

Steroids may have a potential role in reducing CSDH recurrence but do not appear to confer significant advantages in terms of mortality or functional outcomes. However, their use is associated with a higher risk of adverse effects and complications. Given the limitations of existing studies, further research is needed to refine the role of steroids in CSDH management, considering patient-specific factors and treatment protocols.

How does research activity align with research need in chronic subdural haematoma: a gap analysis of systematic reviews with end-user selected knowledge gaps

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is increasingly common. Although treatment is triaged and provided by neurosurgery, the role of non-operative care, alongside observed peri-operative morbidity and patient complexity, suggests that optimum care requires a multi-disciplinary approach. A UK consortium (Improving Care in Elderly Neurosurgery Initiative [ICENI]) has been formed to develop the first comprehensive clinical practice guideline. This starts by identifying critical questions to ask of the literature. The aim of this review was to consider whether existing systematic reviews had suitably addressed these questions.

METHODS

Critical research questions to inform CSDH care were identified using multi-stakeholder workshops, including patient and public representation. A CSDH umbrella review of full-text systematic reviews and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement (CRD42022328562). Four databases were searched from inception up to 30 April 2022. Review quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2 criteria, mapped to critical research questions.

RESULTS

Forty-four critical research questions were identified, across 12 themes. Seventy-three articles were included in the umbrella review, comprising 206,369 patients. Most reviews (86.3%, n=63) assessed complications and recurrence after surgery. ICENI themes were not addressed in current literature, and duplication of reviews was common (54.8%, n=40). AMSTAR-2 confidence rating was high in 7 (9.6%) reviews, moderate in 8 (11.0%), low in 10 (13.7%) and critically low in 48 (65.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

The ICENI themes have yet to be examined in existing secondary CSDH literature, and a series of new reviews is now required to address these questions for a clinical practice guideline. There is a need to broaden and redirect research efforts to meet the organisation of services and clinical needs of individual patients.

Effect of postoperative tranexamic acid on recurrence rate and complications in chronic subdural hematomas patients: preliminary results of a randomized controlled clinical trial

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a frequent neurosurgical disease which mainly affects elderly patients. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been hypothesized as an oral agent to avoid CSDH progression and/or recurrence. We performed an evaluation to determine whether the postoperative use of TXA reduces recurrence rate. A prospective, randomized, and controlled trial. Patients with unilateral or bilateral chronic subdural hematoma undergoing surgical treatment by burr-hole were randomized as to whether or not to use TXA in the postoperative period. We evaluated image and clinical recurrence of CSDH at follow up of 6 months and potential clinical and/or surgical complications impact of TXA. Twenty-six patients were randomized to the control group (52%) and twenty-four patients to the TXA group (48%). Follow-up ranged from 3 to 16 months. There were no significant difference between baseline data in groups regarding to age, gender, use of antiplatelet or anticoagulants, smoking, alcoholism, systemic arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hematoma laterality, hematoma thickness, and drain use. Clinical and radiological recurrence occurred in three patients (6%), being two cases in TXA group (8.3%) and 1 in control group (3.8%). Postoperative complications occurred in two patients during follow-up (4%), being both cases in TXA group (8.3%), and none in the control group. Although TXA group had a higher recurrence rate (8.3%), there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Moreover, TXA group had two complications while control group had no complications. Although limited by experimental nature of study and small sample, our current data suggest that TXA should not be used as a potential agent to avoid recurrences of CSDH and might increase complication odds.

Anti-Inflammatory Drug Therapy in Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Randomized, Double-Blind and Placebo-Controlled Trials

Althoughanti-inflammatory drug therapy has been identified as potentially beneficial for patients suffering from chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH), contemporary literature presents contradictory results. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to investigate the impact of anti-inflammatory drug therapy on mortality and outcome. We searched for eligible randomized, placebo-controlled prospective trials (RTCs) on PubMed, Embase and Medline until July 2022. From 97 initially identified articles, five RTCs met the criteria and were included in our meta-analysis. Our results illustrate significantly lower rates of recurrent cSDH (OR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.21-0.58, p = 0.0001) in patients undergoing anti-inflammatory therapy. In the subgroup of patients undergoing primary conservative treatment, anti-inflammatory therapy was associated with lower rates of "switch to surgery" cases (OR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.14-0.63, p = 0.002). Despite these findings, anti-inflammatory drugs seemed to be associated with higher mortality rates in patients undergoing surgery (OR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.03-3.01, p = 0.04), although in the case of primary conservative treatment, no effect on mortality has been observed (OR: 2.45; 95% CI: 0.35-17.15, p = 0.37). Further multicentric prospective randomized trials are needed to evaluate anti-inflammatory drugs as potentially suitable therapy for asymptomatic patients with cSDH to avoid the necessity of surgical hematoma evacuation on what are predominantly elderly, vulnerable, patients.

Effectiveness Comparisons of Drug Therapy on Chronic Subdural Hematoma Recurrence: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Objectives: We aim to compare the effectiveness of different drug treatments in improving recurrence in patients with chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH).

Methods: Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective trials were searched in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase, from database inception to December 2021. After the available studies following inclusion and exclusion criteria were screened, the main outcome measures were strictly extracted. Taking the random-effects model, dichotomous data were determined and extracted by odds ratio (OR) with 95% credible interval (CrI), and a surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was generated to calculate the ranking probability of comparative effectiveness among each drug intervention. Moreover, we used the node-splitting model to evaluate inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons of our network meta-analysis (NMA). Funnel plots were used to evaluate publication bias.

Results: From the 318 articles found during initial citation screening, 11 RCTs and 3 prospective trials (n = 3,456 participants) were ultimately included in our study. Our NMA results illustrated that atorvastatin + dexamethasone (ATO+DXM) (OR = 0.06, 95% CrI 0.01, 0.89) was the most effective intervention to improve recurrence in patients with CSDH (SUCRA = 89.40%, 95% CrI 0.29, 1.00). Four drug interventions [ATO+DXM (OR = 0.06, 95% CrI 0.01, 0.89), DXM (OR = 0.18, 95% CrI 0.07, 0.41), tranexamic acid (TXA) (OR = 0.26, 95% CrI 0.07, 0.41), and ATO (OR = 0.41, 95% CrI 0.12, 0.90)] achieved statistical significance in improving recurrence in CSDH patients compared with the placebo (PLB) or standard neurosurgical treatment (SNT) group.

Conclusion: Our NMA showed that ATO+DXM, DXM, ATO, and TXA had definite efficacy in improving recurrence in CSDH patients. Among them, ATO+DXM is the best intervention for improving recurrence in patients with CSDH in this particular population. Multicenter rigorous designed prospective randomized trials are still needed to evaluate the role of various drug interventions in improving neurological function or outcome.

Systematic Review Registration: (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=299491), identifier (CRD 42022299491).

The Efficacy of Adjuvant Corticosteroids in Surgical Management of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy of adjuvant corticosteroids in managing patients with chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) undergoing surgical intervention.

Methods: We searched for eligible studies electronically on the databases of PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. The last date of the search was 15th Jun 2021. Outcomes were pooled to calculate risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: Eleven studies were included. Four of them were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Six studies reported data on good neurological outcomes but with variable definitions. Combining all studies, we noted no statistically significant difference in good neurological outcome with the use of adjuvant corticosteroids (RR: 0.91 95% CI: 0.74, 1.12 I² = 92% p = 0.39). Similar results were obtained on subgroup analysis based on definition and study type. However, the use of adjuvant corticosteroids was associated with a significantly reduced risk of recurrence (RR: 0.51 95% CI: 0.40, 0.64 I² = 0% p < 0.0001). The meta-analysis also demonstrated no statistically significant difference in mortality rates with the use of adjuvant corticosteroids (RR: 1.01 95% CI: 0.47, 2.21 I² = 76% p = 0.97). The results did not differ between RCTs and non-RCTs. Limited studies reported data on complications, and pooled analysis indicated no significant increase in infectious, gastrointestinal, and neurological complications with the use of adjuvant corticosteroids.

Conclusion: The use of corticosteroids with surgery for CSDH might be associated with a reduction in recurrence rate. However, corticosteroids do not improve functional outcomes or mortality rates. Future studies should assess the impact of different corticosteroid regimens on patient outcomes, and should use standardized reporting of neurological outcomes with uniform follow-up duration.

Factors correlated with the postoperative recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma: An umbrella study of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common neurological disease, and the surgical evacuation of subdural collection remains the primary treatment approach for symptomatic patients. Postoperative recurrence is a serious complication, and several factors are correlated with postoperative recurrence.

METHODS

We searched Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane Library from their establishment to September 2020. Reports on randomized, prospective, retrospective, and overall observational studies on the management of surgical patients with CSDH were searched, and an independent reviewer performed research quality assessment. Factors that affect the postoperative recurrence of CSDH were extracted: social demographics, drugs (as the main or auxiliary treatment), surgical management, imaging, and other risk factors. We evaluated the recurrence rate of each risk factor. A random effect model was used to perform a meta-analysis, and each risk factor affecting the postoperative recurrence of CSDH was then evaluated and graded.

FINDINGS

In total, 402 studies were included in this analysis and 32 potential risk factors were evaluated. Among these, 21 were significantly associated with the postoperative recurrence of CSDH. Three risk factors (male, bilateral hematoma, and no drainage) had convincing evidence. The classification of evidence can help clinicians identify significant risk factors for the postoperative recurrence of CSDH.

INTERPRETATION

Only few associations were supported by high-quality evidence. Factors with high-quality evidence may be important for treating and preventing CSDH recurrence. Our results can be used as a basis for improving clinical treatment strategies and designing preventive methods.

FUNDING

No funding was received.

Adjuvant Corticosteroids With Surgery for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The use of adjuvant corticosteroids with surgery for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) has received considerable attention in recent years. However, there is no conclusive evidence regarding its effectiveness and safety for CSDH. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis and systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of corticosteroids as an adjuvant treatment for the treatment of CSDH. We comprehensively searched electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) to identify relevant trials that investigated the efficacy and safety of adjuvant corticosteroids with surgery for CSDH, published from inception until May 2021. Outcome measures included recurrence rate, all-cause mortality, good functional outcome, length of hospitalization, and adverse events. We used the Cochrane risk of bias method to evaluate the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale to evaluate the quality of observational studies. We included nine studies, consisting of three RCTs and six observational studies, that compared corticosteroids as an adjuvant treatment to surgery with surgery alone. Pooled results revealed that the risk of recurrence was significantly reduced in patients who received adjuvant corticosteroids with surgery compared to those who underwent surgery alone (relative risk [RR] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.39–0.69, p < 0.00001). However, no statistically significant difference was observed between these groups in all-cause mortality (RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.37–2.23, p = 0.83), good functional outcome (RR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.96–1.10, p = 0.47), length of hospitalization (MD = 0.35, 95% CI = –2.23 to 1.67, p = 0.83), and infection rates (RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.64–1.53, p = 0.95). Adjuvant corticosteroids with surgery reduce the risk of recurrence of CDSH, but do not improve the all-cause mortality or functional outcome, as compared to surgery alone. These findings support the use of adjuvant corticosteroids with surgery for CSDH patients. Further high-quality RCTs are required to confirm the efficacy and safety of adjuvant corticosteroids in the treatment of CSDH patients.

Adjunctive postoperative course of dexamethasone in chronic subdural hematoma: Effect on surgical outcome

Objectives:

To compare the effect of burrhole craniostomy with and without a postoperative course of dexamethasone on recurrence rate of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH).

Methods:

The study was conducted at the Department of Neurosurgery, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, from September 2017 till May 2018. Adult patients diagnosed with CSDH and advised burrhole craniostomy were enrolled in this prospective randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomized into Group-1 (receiving two weeks dexamethasone), and Group-2 (no dexamethasone). Clinical assessment and Brain CT were done preoperatively, second postoperative day, sixth and twelfth postoperative week, with outcome assessed at twelfth postoperative week. Complications of treatment and recurrence rate were recorded.

Results:

Ninety-two (n=92, 46 in each group) patients were enrolled. Improvement in neurological (95.7% vs 93.5%; P=0.646) and radiological outcome (95.7% vs 93.5%; P=0.646) was similar in both groups. Complication rate was higher in Group-1 but not significantly different (58.7% vs 43.5%; P=0.535). Most frequent complication was pneumocephalus, with mortality rate equal (n=one). Recurrence was observed in 2.2% (n=1/46) patients in Group-1 and 4.3% (n=2/46) in Group-2 (P=0.557), which was not statistically significant.

Conclusions:

Neurological and radiological outcome, and mortality rates were similar in both groups. The recurrence rate was lower and complications slightly higher in Group-1 but these were not statistically significant.

Efficacy and Safety of Glucocorticoids Versus Placebo as an Adjuvant Treatment to Surgery in Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common neurosurgical disease with a high recurrence rate, especially among the elderly. Glucocorticoids have been tested for the treatment of CSDH in observational studies and randomized clinical trials.

METHODS

We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database for randomized trials from the earliest date available to May 23, 2021 that had compared glucocorticoids and placebo as a postoperative treatment of CSDH. Trials were included if the study participants were aged ≥18 years and had had CSDH after surgery. The relative risk (RR) was used to evaluate the clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

We included 5 eligible randomized controlled trials with a total of 1251 patients. The findings showed that the use of adjuvant glucocorticoid therapy can effectively reduce the recurrence risk of CSDH compared with placebo (RR, 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.58; P < 0.001). No significant differences were found between the glucocorticoid and placebo groups regarding favorable neurological outcomes (RR, 1; 95% CI, 0.93-1.08; P = 0.92). We found that the use of adjuvant glucocorticoids resulted in a significant increase in psychiatric symptoms (RR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.83-5.64; P < 0.001). No significant differences were found for infection between the 2 groups (RR, 1.86; 95% CI, 0.56-6.14; P = 0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Glucocorticoid therapy can effectively reduce the recurrence risk of CSDH after surgery without an increase in the postoperative infection rate. However, significantly increased psychiatric symptoms were reported in the glucocorticoid group.

To drill or not to drill, that is the question: nonsurgical treatment of chronic subdural hematoma in the elderly. A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical pathologies, typically affecting the elderly. Its incidence is expected to grow along with the aging population. Surgical drainage represents the treatment of choice; however, postoperative complications and the rate of recurrence are not negligible. For this reason, nonsurgical alternatives (such as middle meningeal artery embolization, steroids, or tranexamic acid administration) are gaining popularity worldwide and need to be carefully evaluated, especially in the elderly population.

METHODS

The authors performed a systematic review according to PRISMA criteria of the studies analyzing the nonsurgical strategies for CSDHs. They collected all papers in the English language published between 1990 and 2019 by searching different medical databases. The chosen keywords were "chronic subdural hematoma," "conservative treatment/management," "pharmacological treatment," "non-surgical," "tranexamic acid," "dexamethasone," "corticosteroid," "glucocorticoid," "middle meningeal artery," "endovascular treatment," and "embolization."

RESULTS

The authors ultimately collected 15 articles regarding the pharmacological management of CSDHs matching the criteria, and 14 papers included the endovascular treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed that surgery still represents the mainstay in cases of symptomatic patients with large CSDHs; however, adjuvant and alternative therapies can be effective and safe in a carefully selected population. Their inclusion in new guidelines is advisable.

Hematoma subdural crónico: Una patología común de manejo complejo

Antecedentes:

El hematoma subdural crónico (HSDC) es una patología ampliamente estudiada, muy frecuente, sobre todo en adultos mayores; su cuadro clínico tiene una apariencia benigna y suele ir acompañado de múltiples comorbilidades asociadas a la edad, lo que resulta en un aumento de las complicaciones e incluso la muerte. Con el incremento de la expectativa de vida a nivel mundial, el uso de medicamentos antitrombóticos es cada vez más frecuente. El papel de estos fármacos en la evolución de la enfermedad como en la recurrencia, sigue siendo motivo de discusión.

Métodos:

Los autores revisaron la fisiopatología y características clínicas del HSDC. El presente artículo discute acerca de las terapéuticas actuales y las nuevas opciones de tratamiento que podrían mejorar los resultados. Este manuscrito es susceptible de cambios en el tiempo, con el desarrollo científico y tecnológico.

Resultados:

El HSDC puede ser abordado por vía quirúrgica y farmacológica; no obstante, un manejo individualizado requiere la consideracion cuidadosa de diversos factores. A pesar de los avances en el campo de la neurocirugía, la clásica trepanación craneal sigue siendo el Gold estándar en el HSDC y sobre todo en pacientes con síntomas graves. Se debe resaltar que aún hay aspectos de este procedimiento (como la localización del dren, número de drenajes, el efecto de la irrigación, la temperatura de la solución con que se irriga, etc.) que siguen siendo materia de estudio.

Conclusiones:

Entender el mecanismo de la enfermedad ha permitido explicar su historia natural y a su vez proponer nuevas alternativas de tratamiento. El manejo médico (atorvastatina, corticoides) ha generado gran interés por sus alentadores resultados preliminares. Recientemente, se ha reportado la terapia endovascular como una alternativa segura y existe gran expectativa por confirmar su efecto en estudios más grandes.

Relevance of comorbidities and antithrombotic medication as risk factors for reoperation in patients with chronic subdural hematoma

In an aging Western society, the incidence of chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH) is continuously increasing. In this study, we reviewed our clinical management of cSDH patients and identified predictive factors for the need of reoperation due to residual or recurrent hematomas with a focus on the use of antithrombotic drugs. In total, 623 patients who were treated for cSDH with surgical evacuation between 2006 and 2016 at our department were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical and radiological characteristics and laboratory parameters were investigated as possible predictors of reoperation with univariate and multivariate analyses. Additionally, clinical outcome measures were compared between patients on anticoagulants, on antiplatelets, and without antithrombotic medication. In univariate analyses, patients on anticoagulants and antiplatelets presented significantly more often with comorbidities, were significantly older, and their risk for perioperative complications was significantly increased. Nevertheless, their clinical outcome was comparable to that of patients without antithrombotics. In multivariate analysis, only the presence of comorbidities, but not antithrombotics, was an independent predictor for the need for reoperations. Patients on antithrombotics do not seem to necessarily have a significantly increased risk for residual hematomas or rebleeding requiring reoperation after cSDH evacuation. More precisely, the presence of predisposing comorbidities might be a key independent risk factor for reoperation. Importantly, the clinical outcomes after surgical evacuation of cSDH are comparable between patients on anticoagulants, antiplatelets, and without antithrombotics.

Awake surgery in sitting position for chronic subdural hematoma

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common pathology in neurosurgery, especially in the elderly patients, and its incidence is likely to double in the next decade. Considering various features of CSDH and the procedure itself, a sitting position may retain the best characteristics of classic positioning, while offering additional comfort for both the patient and the surgeon. The aim of this study was to describe the technical aspects of this procedure in the sitting position, to evaluate safety and discuss the benefits and shortcomings of this modification.

METHOD

This study included a series of 55 patients surgically treated for CSDH in a sitting position at our department between December 2017 and September 2019, representing all the patients operated on during the study period by a single surgeon. Bilateral hematomas were present in 19 patients. Outcomes, during the 6-month follow-up period, were defined as good (CSDH and symptoms resolved) or poor (lethal outcome or reoccurrence). All complications were noted, with emphasis on pneumocephalus, and complications related to the sitting position: tension pneumocephalus, venous air embolism, and compression nerve injury.

RESULTS

Complications previously associated with the sitting position were not noted. The Glasgow Coma Scale and Markwalder Grading Scale scores improved significantly after the surgery (p < 0.001 and p = 0.018). Complications were noted in 17 patients (30.9%), and included 5 cerebrospinal fluid drainages, 3 hematoma reoccurrences, 2 wound infections, and 9 more single-occurring complications. The in-hospital mortality was 5.4% (3 out of 55 patients), while the overall mortality was 16.4% within the 6-month follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

In our series, even the severely ill patients tolerated the position well. No complications associated with the sitting position were noted. Future studies should confirm the safety of this position and evaluate the potential advantages for both the patient and the surgeon.

Pharmacological Treatment in the Management of Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Background: Several pharmacological treatments have been used to treat patients with chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH), although little is known about the comparative effectiveness of different classes of medication. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to compare and rank the efficacy and safety of five drug regimens to determine the best treatment for this group of patients. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Medline, clinicaltrials.gov, the Cochrane database, and Embase to identify relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing drug treatments in adult patients with CSDH. A network meta-analysis was conducted using a Bayesian framework. Random- and fixed-effects models were used to pool the network results, and the preferred model was selected by comparing the deviance information criteria (DIC). Efficacy outcomes included recurrence requiring surgery, changes in hematoma volume, and a good recovery. The safety outcomes were treatment-related adverse events and all-cause mortality. Results: In this Bayesian network meta-analysis, available data were obtained from 12 eligible trials, including 2,098 patients and 5 techniques. Compared to placebo, atorvastatin (RR: 0.45, 95% CrI: 0.24-0.81) and dexamethasone (RR: 0.38, 95% CrI: 0.22-0.63) were similarly effective in reducing recurrence requiring surgery by 55% and 62%, respectively. Dexamethasone (RR: 0.46, 95% CrI: 0.23-0.91) was more effective in reducing recurrence requiring surgery than goreisan. Additionally, atorvastatin reduced the hematoma volume to a greater extent than placebo (MD: -7.44, 95% CrI: -9.49 to -5.43) or goreisan (MD: -14.09, 95% CrI: -23.35 to -4.82). Moreover, tranexamic acid (MD: -12.07, 95% CrI: -21.68 to -2.29) reduced the hematoma volume to a greater extent than goreisan. No significant differences were detected between drugs and placebo with regard to a good recovery. In terms of safety, dexamethasone (RR: 1.96, 95% CrI: 1.20-3.28) increased the risk of mortality compared to placebo. Conclusion: These findings suggest that dexamethasone is the best treatment to reduce recurrence and atorvastatin is the best treatment to reduce hematoma volume in patients with CSDH. However, clinicians should pay close attention to the elevated risk of all-cause mortality and potential adverse events caused by dexamethasone. Future well-designed RCTs with more participants are needed to verify these findings. Clinical Trial Registration: http://osf.io/u9hqp.

Effect of Steroids as an Adjunct to Surgical Treatment in Patients with Chronic Subdural Hematoma

The role of steroids as an adjunct to surgery for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) remains unclear. We evaluated the effect of steroids as an adjunct to surgery on recurrence rates, complications, and mortality. We retrospectively collected data of 525 patients operated on for cSDH between January 2010 and April 2015 at the Amsterdam University Medical Centers and Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam. Data from patients with and without steroid use as an adjunct to surgery were obtained from medical records and compared using the chi-square test, independent-samples t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test, where applicable. Associations between adjuvant steroid use and complications were analyzed with univariable (penalized likelihood) logistic regression analysis. Multi-variate logistic regression was performed to analyze the influence of adjuvant steroid use on recurrence. Propensity-score matching was used to assemble a cohort of patients with similar baseline characteristics. Two hundred seventy-eight of the 525 patients (53%) were treated with adjuvant steroids. Surgery for recurrences occurred less in patients of the steroid group (9% vs. 14%; odds ratio [OR] 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.99), but the effect was not significant after correction for confounders (adjusted aOR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.33-1.05). In the steroid group, delirium (10% vs. 3%; OR, 3.99; 95% CI, 1.72-9.29) and dysregulated glucose levels occurred more frequently (2% vs. 0%; OR, 11.81; 95% CI, 1.38-1542.79), but multi-variate analysis was not possible. After propensity-score matching, McNemar's chi-square test showed that adjuvant steroid use was not significantly associated with recurrence rate (p = 0.10). Steroids as an adjunct to surgery in patients with cSDH did not have a favorable effect on the recurrence rate in our data after controlling for confounders.

How to remove those bloody collections: Nonsurgical treatment options for chronic subdural hematoma

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most prevalent neurosurgical disorders. Patients with CSDH commonly present with altered mental status, focal neurological deficit, and/or headache. The first-line treatment for CSDH is surgical evacuation. Although the surgical procedures for CSDH have been considered relatively “straightforward,” they are not without any risk. The elderly are especially prone to show poor surgical outcomes. To make matters worse, many elderly patients are on anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents, increasing the risk of re-bleeding before and after surgery. These complications have led clinicians to search for nonsurgical alternatives. Dexamethasone should be used with caution for selected patients given its side effects. Tranexamic acid may be utilized as an adjunct therapy to surgery, but more randomized clinical trials are needed to evaluate its definitive efficacy. Interesting results of middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) have been reported from case studies. However, the risks associated with MMAE, including intracerebral hemorrhage, stroke, and vasospasm, have not been properly studied yet. The clinical benefits of atorvastatin and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are uncertain for CSDH. In conclusion, surgical intervention continues to be the first-line treatment while nonsurgical treatment options may be considered an adjunct therapy especially for recurrent hematoma or to reduce the volume of a hematoma.

A Prospective Randomized Study on the Preventive Effect of Japanese Herbal Kampo Medicine Goreisan for Recurrence of Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Although the recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) after surgical treatment significantly affects the patients' quality of life, the recurrence rate has not improved in decades. Goreisan, a Japanese herbal Kampo medicine, promotes the hydragogue effect and has been empirically used in the treatment of CSDH in Japan. We conducted a prospective randomized study to investigate whether Goreisan treatment decreases the recurrence rate of CSDH. Between March 2013 and December 2018, a total of 224 patients who underwent initial burr hole surgery for CSDH were randomly assigned to receive Goreisan for 3 months (Group G) or no medication (Group N). The primary endpoint was symptomatic recurrence within 3 months postoperatively, and the secondary endpoint was complications, including the adverse effects of Goreisan. Of 224 randomized patients, 208 were included in the final analysis (104 in Group G and 104 in Group N). The overall recurrence rate was 9.1% (19/208). The recurrence rate of Group G was lower than that of Group N (5.8% vs 12.5%, P = 0.09), but the difference was not statistically significant. However, a significant preventive effect of Goreisan was found in 145 patients with high-risk computed tomography (CT) features, namely, homogeneous and separated types (5.6% vs 17.6%, P = 0.04). Although the present study did not prove the beneficial effect of Goreisan treatment, it suggested the importance of selecting patients with an increased risk of recurrence. A subset of patients whose hematoma showed homogeneous and separated patterns on CT image might benefit from Goreisan treatment.

External validation and modification of the Oslo grading system for prediction of postoperative recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma

Recently, Oslo grading system (OGS) for prediction of recurrence in chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) was introduced. The aim of the study was to validate and if applicable to modify the grading system. Data of all patients admitted to the Goethe University Hospital between 2016 and 2018 with chronic subdural hematoma were prospectively entered into a database. Dataset of patients with uni- (n = 272) and bilateral cSDH (n = 177) were used for the validation of OGS via logistic regression analysis. Additional predictors were identified and integrated to build a modified OGS (mOGS). Internal validation of the modified OGS was performed using same dataset of patients. The OGS showed a significant good predictive value with correlating increase of recurrence rate depending on the level of score in unilateral cSDH (p = 0.002). Regarding bilateral cSDH, there was no significant predictive value found (p = 0.921). By performing uni- and multivariate analysis, additional predictors for recurrence in uni- and bilateral cSDH were identified and integrated into the score system. Accordingly, the mOGS for unilateral cSDH inherited 4 components: previous OGS with 3 components (OR1.6) and seizure (OR2.5) (0 point, 0% recurrence rate; 1-2 points, 17.4%; 3-4 points, 30.6%; ≥ 5 points, 80%). Regarding bilateral cSDH, the mOGS consisted of 4 components as well: hypodense/gradation subtypes (OR3.3), postoperative unilateral volume > 80 mL (OR7.4), postoperative unilateral air trapping > 80 mL (OR15.3), and seizure (OR5.5) (0 point, 3.6% recurrence rate; 1 point, 30.6%; 2 points, 53.5%; 3 points, 58.3%; ≥ 4 points, 100%). Furthermore, the mOGS was internally verified showing high significant predictive power for recurrent hematoma in uni- (p = 0.004) and bilateral cSDH (p < 0.001). External validation of OGS showed accurate risk stratification of recurrence in unilateral cSDH; however, the validation failed for bilateral cSDH. Thus, mOGS was developed to strengthen its clinical utility and applicability.