1
|
Bell A, Toh WL, Allen P, Cella M, Jardri R, Larøi F, Moseley P, Rossell SL. Examining the relationships between cognition and auditory hallucinations: A systematic review. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2024; 58:467-497. [PMID: 38470085 PMCID: PMC11128145 DOI: 10.1177/00048674241235849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Auditory hallucinations (hearing voices) have been associated with a range of altered cognitive functions, pertaining to signal detection, source-monitoring, memory, inhibition and language processes. Yet, empirical results are inconsistent. Despite this, several theoretical models of auditory hallucinations persist, alongside increasing emphasis on the utility of a multidimensional framework. Thus, clarification of current evidence across the broad scope of proposed mechanisms is warranted. METHOD A systematic search of the Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus databases was conducted. Records were screened to confirm the use of an objective behavioural cognitive task, and valid measurement of hallucinations specific to the auditory modality. RESULTS Auditory hallucinations were primarily associated with difficulties in perceptual decision-making (i.e. reduced sensitivity/accuracy for signal-noise discrimination; liberal responding to ambiguity), source-monitoring (i.e. self-other and temporal context confusion), working memory and language function (i.e. reduced verbal fluency). Mixed or limited support was observed for perceptual feature discrimination, imagery vividness/illusion susceptibility, source-monitoring for stimulus form and spatial context, recognition and recall memory, executive functions (e.g. attention, inhibition), emotion processing and language comprehension/hemispheric organisation. CONCLUSIONS Findings were considered within predictive coding and self-monitoring frameworks. Of concern was the portion of studies which - despite offering auditory-hallucination-specific aims and inferences - employed modality-general measures, and/or diagnostic-based contrasts with psychologically healthy individuals. This review highlights disparities within the literature between theoretical conceptualisations of auditory hallucinations and the body of rigorous empirical evidence supporting such inferences. Future cognitive investigations, beyond the schizophrenia-spectrum, which explicitly define and measure the timeframe and sensory modality of hallucinations, are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrienne Bell
- Centre for Mental Health and Brain Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Wei Lin Toh
- Centre for Mental Health and Brain Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Psychiatry, St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Psychology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Paul Allen
- Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Matteo Cella
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Maudsley Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Renaud Jardri
- University of Lille, INSERM U-1172, Plasticity and Subjectivity Team, Lille Neuroscience and Cognition Research Centre, Fontan Hospital, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | - Frank Larøi
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Psychology and Neuroscience of Cognition Research Unit, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | - Peter Moseley
- Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Susan L Rossell
- Centre for Mental Health and Brain Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Psychiatry, St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cai B, Zhu Y, Liu D, Li Y, Bueber M, Yang X, Luo G, Su Y, Grivel MM, Yang LH, Qian M, Stone WS, Phillips MR. Use of the Chinese version of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery to assess cognitive functioning in individuals with high risk for psychosis, first-episode schizophrenia and chronic schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. WESTERN PACIFIC 2024; 45:101016. [PMID: 38699289 PMCID: PMC11064724 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
More than one hundred studies have used the mainland Chinese version of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) to assess cognition in schizophrenia, but the results of these studies, the quality of the reports, and the strength of the evidence provided in the reports have not been systematically assessed. We identified 114 studies from English-language and Chinese-language databases that used the Chinese MCCB to assess cognition in combined samples of 7394 healthy controls (HC), 392 individuals with clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P), 4922 with first-episode schizophrenia (FES), 1549 with chronic schizophrenia (CS), and 2925 with schizophrenia of unspecified duration. The mean difference (MD) of the composite MCCB T-score (-13.72) and T-scores of each of the seven cognitive domains assessed by MCCB (-14.27 to -7.92) were significantly lower in individuals with schizophrenia than in controls. Meta-analysis identified significantly greater cognitive impairment in FES and CS than in CHR-P in six of the seven domains and significantly greater impairment in CS than FES in the reasoning and problem-solving domain (i.e., executive functioning). The only significant covariate of overall cognitive functioning in individuals with schizophrenia was a negative association with the severity of psychotic symptoms. These results confirm the construct validity of the mainland Chinese version of MCCB. However, there were significant limitations in the strength of the evidence provided about CHR-P (small pooled sample sizes) and the social cognition domain (inconsistency of results across studies), and the quality of many reports (particularly those published in Chinese) was rated 'poor' due to failure to report sample size calculations, matching procedures or methods of handling missing data. Moreover, almost all studies were cross-sectional studies limited to persons under 60 with at least nine years of education, so longitudinal studies of under-educated, older individuals with schizophrenia are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bing Cai
- Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yikang Zhu
- Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Dongyang Liu
- School of Public Health of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Yaxi Li
- Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Marlys Bueber
- Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xuezhi Yang
- The Fifth People's Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Guoshuai Luo
- Mental Health Center of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Anding Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Ying Su
- Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Margaux M. Grivel
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lawrence H. Yang
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Min Qian
- Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - William S. Stone
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael R. Phillips
- Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xie Y, Guan M, Wang Z, Ma Z, Wang H, Fang P, Yin H. rTMS Induces Brain Functional and Structural Alternations in Schizophrenia Patient With Auditory Verbal Hallucination. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:722894. [PMID: 34539338 PMCID: PMC8441019 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.722894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the left temporoparietal cortex reduces the auditory verbal hallucination (AVH) in schizophrenia. However, the underlying neural basis of the rTMS treatment effect for schizophrenia remains not well understood. This study investigates the rTMS induced brain functional and structural alternations and their associations with clinical as well as neurocognitive profiles in schizophrenia patients with AVH. METHODS Thirty schizophrenia patients with AVH and thirty-three matched healthy controls were enrolled. The patients were administered by 15 days of 1 Hz rTMS delivering to the left temporoparietal junction (TPJ) area. Clinical symptoms and neurocognitive measurements were assessed at pre- and post-rTMS treatment. The functional (amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation, ALFF) and structural (gray matter volume, GMV) alternations were compared, and they were then used to related to the clinical and neurocognitive measurements after rTMS treatment. RESULTS The results showed that the positive symptoms, including AVH, were relieved, and certain neurocognitive measurements, including visual learning (VisLearn) and verbal learning (VerbLearn), were improved after the rTMS treatment in the patient group. Furthermore, the rTMS treatment induced brain functional and structural alternations in patients, such as enhanced ALFF in the left superior frontal gyrus and larger GMV in the right inferior temporal cortex. The baseline ALFF and GMV values in certain brain areas (e.g., the inferior parietal lobule and superior temporal gyrus) could be associated with the clinical symptoms (e.g., positive symptoms) and neurocognitive performances (e.g., VerbLearn and VisLearn) after rTMS treatment in patients. CONCLUSION The low-frequency rTMS over the left TPJ area is an efficacious treatment for schizophrenia patients with AVH and could selectively modulate the neural basis underlying psychiatric symptoms and neurocognitive domains in schizophrenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanjun Xie
- Department of Radiology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Muzhen Guan
- Department of Mental Health, Xi’an Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Zhongheng Wang
- Department of Psychiatry, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Zhujing Ma
- Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Medical Psychology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Huaning Wang
- Department of Psychiatry, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Peng Fang
- Department of Military Medical Psychology, School of Medical Psychology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China,*Correspondence: Peng Fang,
| | - Hong Yin
- Department of Radiology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China,Hong Yin,
| |
Collapse
|