1
|
Magalhães M, Domínguez-Martín EM, Jorge J, Gonçalves AC, Massenzio F, Spigarelli R, Ribeiro-Rodrigues T, Catarino S, Girão H, Monti B, Spisni E, Ferreira L, Oliveira PJ, Efferth T, Rijo P, Cabral C. Unveiling the antitumor mechanism of 7α-acetoxy-6β-hydroxyroyleanone from Plectranthus hadiensis in glioblastoma. JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY 2024; 335:118689. [PMID: 39128799 DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2024.118689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2024] [Revised: 07/30/2024] [Accepted: 08/09/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE Glioblastoma (GB) is the most aggressive and prevalent glioma within the central nervous system. Despite considerable efforts, GB continues to exhibit a dismal 5-year survival rate (∼6%). This is largely attributed to unfavorable prognosis and lack of viable treatment options. Therefore, novel therapies centered around plant-derived compounds emerge as a compelling avenue to enhance patient survival and well-being. The South African species, Plectranthus hadiensis Schweinf. (P. hadiensis), a member of the Lamiaceae family, has a history of use in traditional medicine for treating a range of diseases, including respiratory, digestive, and liver disorders. This species exhibits diverse biological activities, such as anti-inflammatory and antitumoral properties, likely attributed to its rich composition of naturally occurring diterpenes, like the abietane diterpene, 7α-acetoxy-6β-hydroxyroyleanone (Roy). Roy has demonstrated promising antitumor effects in various cancer cell lines, making it a compelling candidate for further investigation into its mechanisms against GB. AIM OF THE STUDY This study aims to investigate the antitumor activity and potential mechanism of Roy, a natural lead compound, in GB cells. MATERIAL AND METHODS Roy was isolated from the acetonic extract of P. hadiensis and its antitumor mechanism was assessed in a panel of human GB cell lines (U87, A172, H4, U373, and U118) to mimic tumor heterogeneity. Briefly, the impact of Roy treatment on the metabolic activity of cells was evaluated by Alamar Blue® assay, while cell death, cell cycle regulation, mitochondrial membrane potential, and activated caspase-3 activity were evaluated by flow cytometry. Measurement of mRNA levels of target genes was performed by qPCR, while protein expression was assessed by Western blotting. Cell uptake and impact on mitochondrial morphology were evaluated by confocal microscopy. RESULTS Roy induced G2/M cell cycle arrest, mitochondrial fragmentation, and apoptosis by inhibiting the expression of anti-apoptotic proteins and increasing the levels of activated caspase-3. The concentrations of Roy needed to achieve significant inhibitory outcomes were notably lower (6-9 fold) than those of temozolomide (TMZ), the standard first-line treatment, for achieving comparable effects. In addition, at low concentrations (16 μM), Roy affected the metabolic activity of tumor cells while having no significant impact on non-tumoral cells (microglia and astrocytes). CONCLUSION Overall, Roy demonstrated a robust antitumor activity against GB cells offering a promising avenue for the development of novel chemotherapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Magalhães
- University of Coimbra, Institute for Interdisciplinary Research, Doctoral Programme in Experimental Biology and Biomedicine (PDBEB), Portugal; University of Coimbra, CNC-Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Coimbra, Portugal; University of Coimbra, Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), Clinic Academic Center of Coimbra (CACC), Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal; University of Coimbra, Center for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology (CIBB), Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Eva María Domínguez-Martín
- CBIOS-Universidade Lusófona's Research Center for Biosciences & Health Technologies, Lisbon, Portugal; Departamento de Ciencias Biomédicas, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joana Jorge
- University of Coimbra, Laboratory of Oncobiology and Hematology, University Clinic of Hematology and Applied Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal; University of Coimbra, ICBR, Group of Environment Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO)-Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Ana Cristina Gonçalves
- University of Coimbra, Laboratory of Oncobiology and Hematology, University Clinic of Hematology and Applied Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal; University of Coimbra, ICBR, Group of Environment Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO)-Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Francesca Massenzio
- Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Renato Spigarelli
- Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Teresa Ribeiro-Rodrigues
- University of Coimbra, CNC-Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Coimbra, Portugal; University of Coimbra, Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), Clinic Academic Center of Coimbra (CACC), Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal; University of Coimbra, Center for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology (CIBB), Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Steve Catarino
- University of Coimbra, Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), Clinic Academic Center of Coimbra (CACC), Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal; University of Coimbra, Center for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology (CIBB), Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Henrique Girão
- University of Coimbra, Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), Clinic Academic Center of Coimbra (CACC), Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal; University of Coimbra, Center for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology (CIBB), Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Barbara Monti
- Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Enzo Spisni
- Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Lino Ferreira
- University of Coimbra, CNC-Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Coimbra, Portugal; University of Coimbra, Center for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology (CIBB), Coimbra, Portugal; University of Coimbra, Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Paulo J Oliveira
- University of Coimbra, CNC-Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Coimbra, Portugal; University of Coimbra, Center for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology (CIBB), Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Thomas Efferth
- Department of Pharmaceutical Biology, Institute of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Patrícia Rijo
- CBIOS-Universidade Lusófona's Research Center for Biosciences & Health Technologies, Lisbon, Portugal; Faculty of Pharmacy, Instituto de Investigação Do Medicamento (iMed.ULisboa), University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Célia Cabral
- University of Coimbra, Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), Clinic Academic Center of Coimbra (CACC), Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal; University of Coimbra, Center for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology (CIBB), Coimbra, Portugal; University of Coimbra, Centre for Functional Ecology, Department of Life Sciences, Coimbra, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hainfellner A, Borkovec M, Seebrecht L, Neuhauser M, Roetzer-Pejrimovsky T, Greutter L, Surböck B, Hager-Seifert A, Gorka-Vom Hof D, Urbanic-Purkart T, Stultschnig M, Cijan C, Würtz F, Calabek-Wohinz B, Pichler J, Höllmüller I, Leibetseder A, Weis S, Kleindienst W, Seiberl M, Bieler L, Hecker C, Schwartz C, Iglseder S, Heugenhauser J, Nowosielski M, Thomé C, Moser P, Hoffermann M, Loibnegger K, Dieckmann K, Tomschik M, Widhalm G, Rössler K, Marosi C, Wöhrer A, Hainfellner JA, Oberndorfer S. Glioblastoma in the real-world setting: patterns of care and outcome in the Austrian population. J Neurooncol 2024; 170:407-418. [PMID: 39192069 PMCID: PMC11538164 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04808-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2024] [Accepted: 08/14/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We present results of a retrospective population-based investigation of patterns of care and outcome of glioblastoma patients in Austria. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this nation-wide cooperative project, all Austrian glioblastoma patients newly diagnosed between 2014 and 2018 and registered in the ABTR-SANOnet database were included. Histological typing used criteria of the WHO classification of CNS tumors, 4th edition 2016. Patterns of care were assessed, and all patients were followed until the end of 2019. RESULTS 1,420 adult glioblastoma cases were identified. 813 (57.3%) patients were male and 607 (42.7%) female. Median age at diagnosis was 64 years (range: 18-88). Median overall survival (OS) was 11.6 months in the total cohort and 10.9 months in patients with proven IDH-wildtype. Median OS in the patient group ≤ 65 years receiving postoperative standard of care therapy was 16.1 months. In the patient group > 65 years with postoperative therapy, median OS was 11.2 months. Follow-up ≥ 5 years identified 13/264 (4.9%) long-term survivors. Brain tumor surgery frequently was assisted by 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) fluorescence (up to 55%). Postoperative treatment was initiated around one month after surgery (median: 31 days) following standardized protocols in 1,041/1,420 (73.3%) cases. In 830 patients (58.5%), concomitant radiochemotherapy was started according to the established standard of care. Treatment in case of progressive disease was considerably variable. 170/1,420 patients (12.0%) underwent a second surgical procedure, 467 (33.0%) received systemic treatment after progression, and 173 (12.2%) were re-irradiated. CONCLUSION Our data illustrate and confirm nation-wide translation of effective standard of care to Austrian glioblastoma patients in the recent past. In the case of progressive disease, highly variable therapeutic approaches were used, most frequently accompanied by anti-angiogenic therapy. Long-term survival was observed in a minor proportion of mostly younger patients who typically had gross total tumor resection, a favorable postoperative ECOG score, and standard of care therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Hainfellner
- Division of Neuropathology and Neurochemistry, Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Medical University Campus AKH 4J, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
- Division of Anatomy, Center for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Martin Borkovec
- Division of Neuropathology and Neurochemistry, Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Medical University Campus AKH 4J, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lukas Seebrecht
- Division of Neuropathology and Neurochemistry, Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Medical University Campus AKH 4J, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Magdalena Neuhauser
- Division of Neuropathology and Neurochemistry, Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Medical University Campus AKH 4J, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Roetzer-Pejrimovsky
- Division of Neuropathology and Neurochemistry, Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Medical University Campus AKH 4J, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lisa Greutter
- Division of Neuropathology and Neurochemistry, Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Medical University Campus AKH 4J, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Birgit Surböck
- Department of Neurology, Clinic Favoriten, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | - Clemens Cijan
- Department of Neurology, State Hospital Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria
| | - Franz Würtz
- Department of Pathology, State Hospital Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria
| | | | - Josef Pichler
- Department of Internal Medicine and Neuro-Oncology, Neuromed Campus, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University of Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Isolde Höllmüller
- Department of Internal Medicine and Neuro-Oncology, Neuromed Campus, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University of Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Annette Leibetseder
- Department of Neurology, Neuromed Campus, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University of Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Serge Weis
- Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Neuromed Campus, Kepler University Hospital, and Clinical Research Institute for Neurosciences, Johannes Kepler University of Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Waltraud Kleindienst
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Michael Seiberl
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Lara Bieler
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Constantin Hecker
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Christoph Schwartz
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Sarah Iglseder
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Martha Nowosielski
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Claudius Thomé
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Patrizia Moser
- Laboratory of Neuropathology, Tirol Kliniken GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Markus Hoffermann
- Department of Neurosurgery, State Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria
| | - Karin Loibnegger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria
| | - Karin Dieckmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthias Tomschik
- Department of Neurosurgery, Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Georg Widhalm
- Department of Neurosurgery, Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Karl Rössler
- Department of Neurosurgery, Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christine Marosi
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Internal Medicine I, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine I, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Adelheid Wöhrer
- Division of Neuropathology and Neurochemistry, Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Medical University Campus AKH 4J, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Johannes A Hainfellner
- Division of Neuropathology and Neurochemistry, Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Medical University Campus AKH 4J, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stefan Oberndorfer
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital St. Pölten, Dunant-Platz 1, 3100, St. Pölten, Austria.
- Karl Landsteiner Institute for Clinical Neurology and Neuropsychology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital St. Pölten, St. Pölten, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wu Y, Qiu S, Groot ML, Zhang Z. Self-Supervised Image Denoising of Third Harmonic Generation Microscopic Images of Human Glioma Tissue by Transformer-Based Blind Spot (TBS) Network. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2024; 28:4688-4700. [PMID: 38801682 DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2024.3405562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
Third harmonic generation (THG) microscopy shows great potential for instant pathology of brain tumor tissue during surgery. However, due to the maximal permitted exposure of laser intensity and inherent noise of the imaging system, the noise level of THG images is relatively high, which affects subsequent feature extraction analysis. Denoising THG images is challenging for modern deep-learning based methods because of the rich morphologies contained and the difficulty in obtaining the noise-free counterparts. To address this, in this work, we propose an unsupervised deep-learning network for denoising of THG images which combines a self-supervised blind spot method and a U-shape Transformer using a dynamic sparse attention mechanism. The experimental results on THG images of human glioma tissue show that our approach exhibits superior denoising performance qualitatively and quantitatively compared with previous methods. Our model achieves an improvement of 2.47-9.50 dB in SNR and 0.37-7.40 dB in CNR, compared to six recent state-of-the-art unsupervised learning models including Neighbor2Neighbor, Blind2Unblind, Self2Self+, ZS-N2N, Noise2Info and SDAP. To achieve an objective evaluation of our model, we also validate our model on public datasets including natural and microscopic images, and our model shows a better denoising performance than several recent unsupervised models such as Neighbor2Neighbor, Blind2Unblind and ZS-N2N. In addition, our model is nearly instant in denoising a THG image, which has the potential for real-time applications of THG microscopy.
Collapse
|
4
|
Ngai CH, Teo C, Foo JY, Lim S, Koh JQS, Chan HM, Loh NHW, Teo K. Application of a Standardized Treatment Paradigm as a Strategy to Achieve Optimal Onco-Functional Balance in Glioma Surgery. Brain Tumor Res Treat 2024; 12:100-108. [PMID: 38742258 PMCID: PMC11096634 DOI: 10.14791/btrt.2024.0011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gliomas, characterized by their invasive persistence and tendency to affect critical brain regions, pose a challenge in surgical resection due to the risk of neurological deficits. This study focuses on a personalized approach to achieving an optimal onco-functional balance in glioma resections, emphasizing maximal tumor removal while preserving the quality of life. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 57 awake surgical resections of gliomas at the National University Hospital, Singapore, was conducted. The inclusion criteria were based on diagnosis, functional boundaries determined by direct electrical stimulation, preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status score, and absence of multifocal disease on MRI. The treatment approach included comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation, determination of suitability for awake surgery, and standard asleep-awake-asleep anesthesia protocol. Tumor resection techniques and postoperative care were systematically followed. RESULTS The study included 53 patients (55.5% male, average age 39 years), predominantly right-handed. Over half reported seizures as their chief complaint. Tumors were mostly low-grade gliomas. Positive mapping of the primary motor cortex was conducted in all cases, with awake surgery completed in 77.2% of cases. New neurological deficits were observed in 26.3% of patients at 1 month after operation; most showed significant improvement at 6 months. CONCLUSION The standardized treatment paradigm effectively achieved an optimal onco-functional balance in glioma patients. While some patients experienced neurological deficits postoperatively, the majority recovered to their preoperative baseline within 3 months. The approach prioritizes patient empowerment and customized utilization of functional mapping techniques, considering the challenge of preserving diverse languages in a multilingual patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chin Hong Ngai
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore.
| | - Colin Teo
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Jen Yinn Foo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sheng Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jia Qian Sophie Koh
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Hui-Minn Chan
- Department of Psychological Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Ne-Hooi Will Loh
- Department of Anaesthesia, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Kejia Teo
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kudruk S, Forsyth CM, Dion MZ, Hedlund Orbeck JK, Luo J, Klein RS, Kim AH, Heimberger AB, Mirkin CA, Stegh AH, Artzi N. Multimodal neuro-nanotechnology: Challenging the existing paradigm in glioblastoma therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024; 121:e2306973121. [PMID: 38346200 PMCID: PMC10895370 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2306973121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Integrating multimodal neuro- and nanotechnology-enabled precision immunotherapies with extant systemic immunotherapies may finally provide a significant breakthrough for combatting glioblastoma (GBM). The potency of this approach lies in its ability to train the immune system to efficiently identify and eradicate cancer cells, thereby creating anti-tumor immune memory while minimizing multi-mechanistic immune suppression. A critical aspect of these therapies is the controlled, spatiotemporal delivery of structurally defined nanotherapeutics into the GBM tumor microenvironment (TME). Architectures such as spherical nucleic acids or poly(beta-amino ester)/dendrimer-based nanoparticles have shown promising results in preclinical models due to their multivalency and abilities to activate antigen-presenting cells and prime antigen-specific T cells. These nanostructures also permit systematic variation to optimize their distribution, TME accumulation, cellular uptake, and overall immunostimulatory effects. Delving deeper into the relationships between nanotherapeutic structures and their performance will accelerate nano-drug development and pave the way for the rapid clinical translation of advanced nanomedicines. In addition, the efficacy of nanotechnology-based immunotherapies may be enhanced when integrated with emerging precision surgical techniques, such as laser interstitial thermal therapy, and when combined with systemic immunotherapies, particularly inhibitors of immune-mediated checkpoints and immunosuppressive adenosine signaling. In this perspective, we highlight the potential of emerging treatment modalities, combining advances in biomedical engineering and neurotechnology development with existing immunotherapies to overcome treatment resistance and transform the management of GBM. We conclude with a call to action for researchers to leverage these technologies and accelerate their translation into the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergej Kudruk
- Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL60208
- International Institute for Nanotechnology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL60208
| | - Connor M. Forsyth
- Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL60208
- International Institute for Nanotechnology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL60208
| | - Michelle Z. Dion
- Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA02115
- Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA02139
| | - Jenny K. Hedlund Orbeck
- Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL60208
- International Institute for Nanotechnology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL60208
| | - Jingqin Luo
- The Brain Tumor Center, Alvin J. Siteman Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO63110
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO63110
| | - Robyn S. Klein
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO63110
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO63110
- Center for Neuroimmunology and Neuroinfectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO63110
| | - Albert H. Kim
- The Brain Tumor Center, Alvin J. Siteman Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO63110
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO63110
| | - Amy B. Heimberger
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Malnati Brain Tumor Institute of the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL60611
| | - Chad A. Mirkin
- Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL60208
- International Institute for Nanotechnology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL60208
| | - Alexander H. Stegh
- The Brain Tumor Center, Alvin J. Siteman Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO63110
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO63110
| | - Natalie Artzi
- Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA02139
- Department of Medicine, Engineering in Medicine Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA02115
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kokkinos V, Chatzisotiriou A, Seimenis I. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Diffusion Tensor Imaging-Tractography in Resective Brain Surgery: Lesion Coverage Strategies and Patient Outcomes. Brain Sci 2023; 13:1574. [PMID: 38002534 PMCID: PMC10670090 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13111574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-tractography and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have dynamically entered the presurgical evaluation context of brain surgery during the past decades, providing novel perspectives in surgical planning and lesion access approaches. However, their application in the presurgical setting requires significant time and effort and increased costs, thereby raising questions regarding efficiency and best use. In this work, we set out to evaluate DTI-tractography and combined fMRI/DTI-tractography during intra-operative neuronavigation in resective brain surgery using lesion-related preoperative neurological deficit (PND) outcomes as metrics. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 252 consecutive patients admitted for brain surgery. Standard anatomical neuroimaging protocols were performed in 127 patients, 69 patients had additional DTI-tractography, and 56 had combined DTI-tractography/fMRI. fMRI procedures involved language, motor, somatic sensory, sensorimotor and visual mapping. DTI-tractography involved fiber tracking of the motor, sensory, language and visual pathways. At 1 month postoperatively, DTI-tractography patients were more likely to present either improvement or preservation of PNDs (p = 0.004 and p = 0.007, respectively). At 6 months, combined DTI-tractography/fMRI patients were more likely to experience complete PND resolution (p < 0.001). Low-grade lesion patients (N = 102) with combined DTI-tractography/fMRI were more likely to experience complete resolution of PNDs at 1 and 6 months (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). High-grade lesion patients (N = 140) with combined DTI-tractography/fMRI were more likely to have PNDs resolved at 6 months (p = 0.005). Patients with motor symptoms (N = 80) were more likely to experience complete remission of PNDs at 6 months with DTI-tractography or combined DTI-tractography/fMRI (p = 0.008 and p = 0.004, respectively), without significant difference between the two imaging protocols (p = 1). Patients with sensory symptoms (N = 44) were more likely to experience complete PND remission at 6 months with combined DTI-tractography/fMRI (p = 0.004). The intraoperative neuroimaging modality did not have a significant effect in patients with preoperative seizures (N = 47). Lack of PND worsening was observed at 6 month follow-up in patients with combined DTI-tractography/fMRI. Our results strongly support the combined use of DTI-tractography and fMRI in patients undergoing resective brain surgery for improving their postoperative clinical profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasileios Kokkinos
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | | | - Ioannis Seimenis
- Department of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Democritus University of Thrace, 387479 Alexandroupolis, Greece;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kiesel B, Wadiura LI, Mischkulnig M, Makolli J, Sperl V, Borkovec M, Freund J, Lang A, Millesi M, Berghoff AS, Furtner J, Woehrer A, Widhalm G. Efficacy, Outcome, and Safety of Elderly Patients with Glioblastoma in the 5-ALA Era: Single Center Experience of More Than 10 Years. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13236119. [PMID: 34885227 PMCID: PMC8657316 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13236119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary In the next decades, the incidence of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) will markedly increase due to the growth of the elderly population. Despite the increasing incidence of GBM, elderly patients are frequently excluded from clinical studies and thus, only few data are available specifically focusing on the elderly population. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy, outcome, and safety of surgically-treated GBM including resections and biopsies in the 5-ALA era in a large elderly cohort of altogether 272 patients. Our data of this large elderly cohort demonstrate for the first time the clinical utility and safety of 5-ALA fluorescence in GBM for improved tumor visualization in both resections as well as biopsies. Therefore, we recommend the use of 5-ALA not only in resections, but also in open/stereotactic biopsies to optimize the neurosurgical management of elderly GBM patients. Abstract Background: In the next decades, the incidence of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) will increase due to the growth of the elderly population. Fluorescence-guided resection using 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) is widely applied to achieve maximal safe resection of GBM and is identified as a novel intraoperative marker for diagnostic tissue during biopsies. However, detailed analyses of the use of 5-ALA in resections as well as biopsies in a large elderly cohort are still missing. The aim of this study was thus to investigate the efficacy, outcome, and safety of surgically- treated GBM in the 5-ALA era in a large elderly cohort. Methods: All GBM patients aged 65 years or older who underwent neurosurgical intervention between 2007 and 2019 were included. Data on 5-ALA application, intraoperative fluorescence status, and 5-ALA-related side effects were derived from our databank. In the case of resection, the tumor resectability and the extent of resection were determined. Potential prognostic parameters relevant for overall survival were analyzed. Results: 272 GBM patients with a median age of 71 years were included. Intraoperative 5-ALA fluorescence was applied in most neurosurgical procedures (n = 255/272, 88%) and visible fluorescence was detected in most cases (n = 252/255, 99%). In biopsies, 5-ALA was capable of visualizing tumor tissue by visible fluorescence in all but one case (n = 91/92, 99%). 5-ALA administration did not result in any severe side effects. Regarding patient outcome, smaller preoperative tumor volume (<22.75 cm3), gross total resection, single lesions, improved postoperative neurological status, and concomitant radio-chemotherapy showed a significantly longer overall survival. Conclusions: Our data of this large elderly cohort demonstrate the clinical utility and safety of 5-ALA fluorescence in GBM for improved tumor visualization in both resections as well as biopsies. Therefore, we recommend the use of 5-ALA not only in resections, but also in open/stereotactic biopsies to optimize the neurosurgical management of elderly GBM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Kiesel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (B.K.); (L.I.W.); (M.M.); (J.M.); (V.S.); (M.B.); (J.F.); (A.L.); (M.M.)
| | - Lisa I. Wadiura
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (B.K.); (L.I.W.); (M.M.); (J.M.); (V.S.); (M.B.); (J.F.); (A.L.); (M.M.)
| | - Mario Mischkulnig
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (B.K.); (L.I.W.); (M.M.); (J.M.); (V.S.); (M.B.); (J.F.); (A.L.); (M.M.)
| | - Jessica Makolli
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (B.K.); (L.I.W.); (M.M.); (J.M.); (V.S.); (M.B.); (J.F.); (A.L.); (M.M.)
| | - Veronika Sperl
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (B.K.); (L.I.W.); (M.M.); (J.M.); (V.S.); (M.B.); (J.F.); (A.L.); (M.M.)
| | - Martin Borkovec
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (B.K.); (L.I.W.); (M.M.); (J.M.); (V.S.); (M.B.); (J.F.); (A.L.); (M.M.)
| | - Julia Freund
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (B.K.); (L.I.W.); (M.M.); (J.M.); (V.S.); (M.B.); (J.F.); (A.L.); (M.M.)
| | - Alexandra Lang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (B.K.); (L.I.W.); (M.M.); (J.M.); (V.S.); (M.B.); (J.F.); (A.L.); (M.M.)
| | - Matthias Millesi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (B.K.); (L.I.W.); (M.M.); (J.M.); (V.S.); (M.B.); (J.F.); (A.L.); (M.M.)
| | - Anna S. Berghoff
- Department of Medicine I, Clinical Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Julia Furtner
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Adelheid Woehrer
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Neuropathology and Neurochemistry, Medical University Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Georg Widhalm
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (B.K.); (L.I.W.); (M.M.); (J.M.); (V.S.); (M.B.); (J.F.); (A.L.); (M.M.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|