Multiple pipeline embolization devices improves aneurysm occlusion without increasing morbidity: A single center experience of 140 cases

Repeat Flow Diversion for Retreatment of Incompletely Occluded Large Complex Symptomatic Cerebral Aneurysms: A Retrospective Case Series

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Data regarding radiographic occlusion rates after repeat flow diversion after initial placement of a flow diverter (FD) in large intracranial aneurysms are limited. We report clinical and angiographic outcomes on 7 patients who required retreatment with overlapping FDs after initial flow diversion for large intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of cerebrovascular procedures performed at our institution from 2017 to 2021. We identified patients who underwent retreatment with overlapping FDs for large (>10 mm) cerebral aneurysms after initial flow diversion. At last angiographic follow-up, occlusion grade was evaluated using the O'Kelly-Marotta (OKM) grading scale.

RESULTS

Seven patients (median age 57 years) with cerebral aneurysms requiring retreatment were identified. The most common aneurysm location was the ophthalmic internal carotid artery (n = 3) and basilar trunk (n = 3). There were 4 fusiform and 3 saccular aneurysms. The median aneurysm width was 18 mm; the median neck size for saccular aneurysms was 7 mm; and the median dome-to-neck ratio was 2.8. The median time to retreatment was 9 months, usually due to symptomatic mass effect. After retreatment, the median clinical follow-up was 36 months, MRI/magnetic resonance angiography follow-up was 15 months, and digital subtraction angiography follow-up was 14 months. Aneurysm occlusion at last angiographic follow-up was graded as OKM A (total filling, n = 1), B (subtotal filling, n = 2), C (early neck remnant, n = 3), and D (no filling, n = 0). All patients with symptomatic improvement were OKM C, whereas patients with worsened symptom burden were OKM A or B. Two patients required further open surgical management for definitive management of the aneurysm remnant.

CONCLUSION

Although most patients demonstrated a decrease in aneurysm remnant size, many had high-grade persistent filling (OKM grades A or B) in this subset of mostly large fusiform aneurysms. Larger studies with longer follow-up are warranted to optimize treatment strategies for atypical aneurysm remnants after repeat flow diversion.

Inflow Angle and Height-Width Ratio are Predictors of Incomplete Occlusion at One and Two Years After Flow Diverter Treatment for Small- and Medium-Sized Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the association between the inflow angle of aneurysms and their occlusion status at 1 and 2 years after flow diverter (FD) treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 42 consecutive patients from a single center with 43 untreated, unruptured internal carotid artery (ICA) proximal to communicating segment, saccular aneurysms sized <12 mm.

RESULTS

At 1 year posttreatment, the complete occlusion (CO) rate was 58.1%. On univariate analyses, the proportion of inflow angle >90° was significantly lower in the CO group than in the incomplete occlusion group (20.0% VS. 83.3%; P < 0.001). The CO incidence decreased with a height-width (H/W) ratio of <1.2 (P = 0.059). On multivariate analysis, an H/W ratio of <1.2 (odds ratio [OR], 0.076; P = 0.027) and an inflow angle of >90° (OR, 0.020; P = 0.0011) significantly influenced CO at 1 year post FD. At 2 years posttreatment, the CO rate was 76.3% (29/38 cases with available follow-up data). On univariate analyses, in the CO group compared to the incomplete occlusion group, the proportion of H/W ratio <1.2 was significantly lower (P = 0.005) and the proportion of inflow angle >90° was significantly lower (P = 0.021); aneurysm dome size tended to be larger (8.5 mm vs. 7.1 mm; P = 0.080). On multivariate analysis, an H/W ratio <1.2 (OR, 0.042; P = 0.015) and an inflow angle >90° (OR: 0.088; P = 0.031) significantly influenced CO at 2 years post FD.

CONCLUSIONS

The inflow angle of >90° and H/W ratio <1.2 may significantly influence the CO rate in small- or medium-sized internal carotid artery aneurysms 1 and 2 years post FD.

Flow diversion for compressive unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms with neuro-ophthalmological symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Data on the safety and efficacy of flow diverters (FD) for the treatment of unruptured internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms with compressive neuro-ophthalmological symptoms (NOS) are scarce and comprise mainly small case series.

METHODS

We performed a search of three databases and included series with ≥10 patients, with unruptured aneurysms of the ICA and NOS, treated with FD. Random-effects analysis of treatment results and safety was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies reporting on 594 patients were included. Pooled proportions of NOS recovery, improvement, transient and permanent worsening were: 47.4% (95% CI 35.0% to 60.1%); 74.5% (95% CI 67.9% to 80.2%); 7.1% (95% CI 3.3% to 14.7%); and 4.9% (95% CI 3.2% to 7.4%), respectively. Rates of complete recovery and improvement in patients with isolated visual symptoms were 30.6% (95% CI 12.5% to 57.7%) and 56.6% (95% CI 42.3% to 69.9%). Isolated oculomotor symptoms recovered completely in 47.8% (95% CI 29.9% to 66.3%) and improved in 78% (95% CI 69.2% to 84.9%). Morbidity occurred in 5% (95% CI 2.8% to 9%) and mortality in 3.9% (95% CI 2% to 7.5%) of patients. An increased likelihood of symptom improvement was observed when treatment was performed early (<1 month) after symptom onset (OR=11.22, 95% CI 3.9% to 32.5%).

CONCLUSION

Flow diversion promotes recovery or improvement of compressive symptoms in a large proportion of patients but is associated with significant rates of morbidity and mortality. Transient and permanent NOS worsening is not uncommon. Early treatment is of utmost importance, as it increases the likelihood of symptom improvement more than 10-fold.

Flow diversion for posterior circulation aneurysms: a multicenter retrospective study

Background

The prevalence of intracranial aneurysms is approximately 3% worldwide. Posterior circulation (PC) aneurysms have a higher risk of treatment complications than anterior circulation aneurysms. Improving the survival rate and quality of life of patients with PC aneurysms remains one of the most important issues in the field.

Objectives

Flow diverter (FD) treatment of PC aneurysms remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the effects of FD treatment and analyze differences among different application methods or aneurysm types in PC aneurysms.

Design

This is a multicenter retrospective study.

Methods

Patients with PC aneurysms treated with the pipeline embolization device (PED) or Tubridge embolization device (TED) between 2015 and 2020 in five neurovascular centers were retrospectively enrolled. The primary outcomes were major perioperative complication, clinical outcome, and aneurysm occlusion rates. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine the risk factors of each outcome.

Results

In total, 252 aneurysms were included. Major perioperative complication, favorable clinical outcome, and complete occlusion rates were 7.5%, 91.0%, and 79.1%, respectively. Compared with other types of aneurysms, dissecting aneurysms had the best clinical outcome and highest occlusion rate. Both clinical and angiographic outcomes were independently associated with the aneurysm location at the basilar artery. Aneurysm size was not associated with any outcome. TED had similar clinical and angiographic outcomes compared with PED but more perioperative major complications. Tandem treatment and coiling assistance may have poorer clinical outcomes but similar occlusion rates. Single- and multiple-stent treatments had similar outcomes.

Conclusion

FD treatment of PC aneurysms achieved favorable clinical outcomes and long-term aneurysm occlusion rates with acceptable perioperative complication rates, especially in dissecting and non-basilar artery aneurysms. There was no additional improvement in outcomes with coiling assistance, multi-stent application, or tandem treatment. Therefore, the use of PC aneurysms should be carefully considered.

Flow diversion treatment for giant intracranial serpentine aneurysms

Background

Giant serpentine aneurysms (GSAs) are among the most complex and challenging type of intracranial aneurysms. Surgical clipping, bypass, or endovascular parent artery occlusion has been the main treatment of GSAs in the past. However, studies on flow diversion (FD) are limited. Therefore, we reported our experience with patients with GSAs treated with FD.

Methods

Patients with GSAs treated with FD from 2012 to 2020 in our single center were retrospectively reviewed. Angiographic outcomes were graded according to the O’Kelly–Marotta scale as complete occlusion (D), trace filling (C), entry remnant (B), or aneurysm filling (A). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) score. We also collected the patients’ treatment details and perioperative complications.

Results

Thirteen patients with 14 aneurysms were included, including three in the anterior circulation and 11 in the posterior circulation. Grades B–D were found in 72.7% (8/11) of the GSAs. Good prognosis (mRS score, 0–2) was found in 66.7% (8/12) and 50.0% (6/12) of the patients at the 6-month and latest follow-up, respectively. Parent artery occlusion was found in three cases of GSAs. Five postoperative complications were observed, including two minor complications and three major complications.

Conclusion

Although reconstructive treatment with FD could be considered as one of the treatment strategies for patients with both anterior and posterior circulation GSAs, however, the risk of complications and parent artery occlusion should be considered.

Flow diversion for cerebral aneurysms

The treatment of cerebral aneurysms includes open microsurgical options (e.g., clipping, trapping/bypass) and evolving endovascular techniques. Following the landmark trials that propelled endovascular treatment to the forefront, flow diversion has shown high aneurysm cure rates with minimal complications. Flow diversion stents are placed in the parent vessel, redirecting blood flow from the aneurysm, promoting reendothelization across the neck, and resulting in complete occlusion of the aneurysm. As a result, flow diversion has become increasingly used as the primary treatment for unruptured aneurysms; however, its applications are being pushed to new frontiers. Here, the authors present three cases showcasing the treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diversion. The video can be found here: https://stream.cadmore.media/r10.3171/2022.7.FOCVID2253.