1
|
Byvaltsev VA, Kalinin AA, Aliyev MA, Pestryakov YY, Riew KD. Long-term results and surgical strategy development for degenerative disease treatment in athletes: a retrospective single-center study. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2024:10.1007/s00586-024-08283-w. [PMID: 38874639 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08283-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze of the results of spine surgical treatment of athletes with lumbar degenerative disease and development of a surgical strategy based on the preoperative symptoms and radiological changes in the lumbar spine. METHODS For 114 athletes with lumbar degenerative disease were included in the present study. Four independent groups were studied: (1) microsurgical/endoscopic discectomy (n = 35); (2) PRP therapy in facet joints (n = 41); (3) total disc replacement (n = 11); (4) lumbar interbody fusion (n = 27). We evaluated postoperative clinical outcomes and preoperative radiological results. The average postoperative follow-up was 5 (3;6), 3.5 (3;5), 3 (2;4) and 4 (3;5) years, respectively. The analysis included an assessment of clinical outcomes (initial clinical symptoms, chronic pain syndrome level according to the VAS, quality of life according to the SF-36 questionnaire, degree of tolerance to physical activity according to the subjective Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale) and radiological data (Dynamic Slip, Dynamic Segmental Angle, degenerative changes in the facet joint according to the Fujiwara classification and disc according to the Pfirrmann classification; changes in the diffusion coefficient using diffusion-weighted MRI). RESULTS The median and 25-75% quartiles timing of return to sports were 12.6 (10.2;14.1), 2.8 (2.4;3.7), 9 (6;12), and 14 (9;17) weeks, respectively. We examined the type of surgical treatment utilized, as well as the preoperative clinical symptoms, severity of degenerative changes in the intervertebral disc and facet joint, the timing of return to sports, the level of pain syndrome, the quality of life according to SF-36, and the degree of tolerance to physical activity. We then developed a surgical strategy based on individual preoperative neurological function and lumbar morphological changes. CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective study, we report clinical results of four treatment options of lumbar spine degenerative disease in athletes. The use of developed patient selection criteria for the analyzed surgical techniques is aimed at minimizing return-to-play times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vadim A Byvaltsev
- Department of Neurosurgery, Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russia.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Railway Clinical Hospital, Irkutsk, Russia.
- Department of Traumatology, Orthopedic and Neurosurgery, Irkutsk State Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Irkutsk, Russia.
| | - Andrei A Kalinin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Railway Clinical Hospital, Irkutsk, Russia
| | - Marat A Aliyev
- Department of Neurosurgery, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | - Yurii Ya Pestryakov
- Department of Neurosurgery, Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russia
| | - K Daniel Riew
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University, New York, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical School, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Avila L, da Silva MD, Neves ML, Abreu AR, Fiuza CR, Fukusawa L, de Sá Ferreira A, Meziat-Filho N. Effectiveness of Cognitive Functional Therapy Versus Core Exercises and Manual Therapy in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain After Spinal Surgery: Randomized Controlled Trial. Phys Ther 2024; 104:pzad105. [PMID: 37548608 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzad105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our aim was to investigate whether cognitive functional therapy (CFT) was more effective than core exercises and manual therapy (CORE-MT) in improving pain and function for patients with chronic low back pain after spinal surgery. METHODS This study was a randomized controlled superiority trial in a university hospital and a private physical therapist clinic in Santa Catarina, Brazil. Eighty participants who were 18 to 75 years old and had chronic low back pain after spinal surgery received 4 to 12 treatment sessions of CFT or CORE-MT once per week for a maximum period of 12 weeks. Primary outcomes were pain intensity (numeric pain rating scale, scored from 0 to 10) and function (Patient-Specific Functional Scale, scored from 0 to 10) after intervention. RESULTS We obtained primary outcome data for 75 participants (93.7%). CFT was more effective, with a large effect size, than CORE-MT in reducing pain intensity (mean difference [MD] = 2.42; 95% CI = 1.69-3.14; effect size [d] = 0.85) and improving function (MD = -2.47; 95% CI = -3.08 to -1.87; effect size = 0.95) after intervention (mean = 10.4 weeks [standard deviation = 2.17] after the beginning of treatment). The differences were maintained at 22 weeks for pain intensity (MD = 1.64; 95% CI = 0.98-2.3; effect size = 0.68) and function (MD = -2.01; 95% CI = -2.6 to -1.41; effect size = 0.81). CONCLUSION CFT was more effective than CORE-MT, with large effect sizes, and may be an option for patients with chronic low back pain after spinal surgery. IMPACT CFT reduces pain and improves function, with large effect sizes, compared with CORE-MT. The difference between CFT and CORE-MT was sustained at the midterm follow-up. Treatment with CFT may be an option for patients with chronic low back pain after spinal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo Avila
- Postgraduate Program in Neuroscience, Center of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
- Laboratory of Neurobiology of Pain and Inflammation, Department of Physiological Sciences, Center of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
| | - Morgana Duarte da Silva
- Postgraduate Program in Neuroscience, Center of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
- Laboratory of Neurobiology of Pain and Inflammation, Department of Physiological Sciences, Center of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
| | - Marcos Lisboa Neves
- Postgraduate Program in Neuroscience, Center of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
- Laboratory of Neurobiology of Pain and Inflammation, Department of Physiological Sciences, Center of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
| | - Andre Rogerio Abreu
- Postgraduate Program in Neuroscience, Center of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
- Laboratory of Neurobiology of Pain and Inflammation, Department of Physiological Sciences, Center of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
| | - Cibelle Ramos Fiuza
- Laboratory of Neurobiology of Pain and Inflammation, Department of Physiological Sciences, Center of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
- Multicenter Postgraduate Program in Physiological Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
| | - Leandro Fukusawa
- Masters and Doctoral Programs in Medical Sciences, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Arthur de Sá Ferreira
- Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Centro Universitário Augusto Motta (UNISUAM), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Ney Meziat-Filho
- Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Centro Universitário Augusto Motta (UNISUAM), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen Z, Zhang L, Dong J, Xie P, Liu B, Chen R, Li S, Liu Z, Yang B, Feng F, He L, Yang Y, Pang M, Rong L. Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy Versus Microendoscopic Discectomy for Lumbar Disk Herniation: Five-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2023; 48:79-88. [PMID: 36083850 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A prospective randomized controlled study. OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and safety between percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) and microendoscopic discectomy (MED). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Two kinds of minimally invasive discectomy, PTED and MED, are now widely used for treating lumbar disk herniation (LDH). The long-term comparative results of these two techniques still remained uncertain. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial, patients were included if they had persistent signs and symptoms of radiculopathy with corresponding imaging-confirmed LDH and were randomly allocated to PTED or MED groups. The primary outcome was the score of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the secondary outcomes included the score of Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey bodily pain (SF36-BP) and physical function (SF36-PF), European Quality of Life-Five Dimensions (EQ-5D), Visual Analog Scales for back pain (VAS-back) and leg pain (VAS-leg). RESULTS A total of 241 patients were accepted to enroll in our randomized controlled trial, of which 119 were randomly assigned to the PTED group, and the rest 122 were assigned to the MED group. A total of 194 out of 241 patients (80.5%) completed the five-year follow-up. PTED group was associated with shorter postoperative in-bed time and length of hospital stay. Both primary and secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups at each follow-up time point. During the five-year follow-up, seven recurrent cases occurred in PTED and MED groups, respectively. CONCLUSION Over the five-year follow-up period, PTED and MED were both efficacious in the treatment of LDH. The long-term clinical outcomes and recurrent rates were comparable between the treatment groups. PTED represents a more minimally invasive technique with the advantages of rapid recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zihao Chen
- Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liangming Zhang
- Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianwen Dong
- Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Peigen Xie
- Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bin Liu
- Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ruiqiang Chen
- Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shangfu Li
- Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhongyu Liu
- Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bu Yang
- Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Feng Feng
- Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lei He
- Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yang Yang
- Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mao Pang
- Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Limin Rong
- Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Guo T, Zhang X, Hu Y, Lin M, Zhang R, Chen X, Yu D, Yao X, Wang P, Zhou H. New Hope for Treating Intervertebral Disc Degeneration: Microsphere-Based Delivery System. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022; 10:933901. [PMID: 35928951 PMCID: PMC9343804 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.933901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration (IVDD) has been considered the dominant factor in low back pain (LBP), and its etiological mechanisms are complex and not yet fully elucidated. To date, the treatment of IVDD has mainly focused on relieving clinical symptoms and cannot fundamentally solve the problem. Recently, a novel microsphere-based therapeutic strategy has held promise for IVD regeneration and has yielded encouraging results with in vitro experiments and animal models. With excellent injectability, biocompatibility, and biodegradability, this microsphere carrier allows for targeted delivery and controlled release of drugs, gene regulatory sequences, and other bioactive substances and supports cell implantation and directed differentiation, aiming to improve the disease state of IVD at the source. This review discusses the possible mechanisms of IVDD and the limitations of current therapies, focusing on the application of microsphere delivery systems in IVDD, including targeted delivery of active substances and drugs, cellular therapy, and gene therapy, and attempts to provide a new understanding for the treatment of IVDD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taowen Guo
- Department of Orthopedics, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Bone and Joint Disease Research of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xiaobo Zhang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
- *Correspondence: Haiyu Zhou, ; Xiaobo Zhang,
| | - Yicun Hu
- Department of Orthopedics, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Bone and Joint Disease Research of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Maoqiang Lin
- Department of Orthopedics, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Bone and Joint Disease Research of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Ruihao Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Bone and Joint Disease Research of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xiangyi Chen
- Department of Orthopedics, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Bone and Joint Disease Research of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Dechen Yu
- Department of Orthopedics, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Bone and Joint Disease Research of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xin Yao
- Department of Orthopedics, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Bone and Joint Disease Research of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Peng Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Bone and Joint Disease Research of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Haiyu Zhou
- Department of Orthopedics, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Bone and Joint Disease Research of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
- Xigu District People’s Hospital, Lanzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Haiyu Zhou, ; Xiaobo Zhang,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Early Reoperation Rates and Its Risk Factors after Instrumented Spinal Fusion Surgery for Degenerative Spinal Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Study of 65,355 Patients. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11123338. [PMID: 35743419 PMCID: PMC9225055 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11123338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Reoperation is a major concern in spinal fusion surgery for degenerative spinal disease. Earlier reported reoperation rates were confined to a specific spinal region without comprehensive analysis, and their prediction models for reoperation were not statistically validated. Our study aimed to present reasonable base rates for reoperation according to all possible risk factors and build a validated prediction model for early reoperation. In our nationwide population-based cohort study, data between 2014 and 2016 were obtained from the Korean National Health Insurance claims database. Patients older than 19 years who underwent instrumented spinal fusion surgery for degenerative spinal diseases were included. The patients were divided into cases (patients who underwent reoperation) and controls (patients who did not undergo reoperation), and risk factors for reoperation were determined by multivariable analysis. The estimates of all statistical models were internally validated using bootstrap samples, and sensitivity analyses were additionally performed to validate the estimates by comparing the two prediction models (models for 1st-year and 3rd-year reoperation). The study included 65,355 patients: 2939 (4.5%) who underwent reoperation within 3 years after the index surgery and 62,146 controls. Reoperation rates were significantly different according to the type of surgical approach and the spinal region. The third-year reoperation rates were 5.3% in the combined lumbar approach, 5.2% in the posterior lumbar approach, 5.0% in the anterior lumbar approach, 3.0% in the posterior thoracic approach, 2.8% in the posterior cervical approach, 2.6% in the anterior cervical approach, and 1.6% in the combined cervical approach. Multivariable analysis identified older age, male sex, hospital type, comorbidities, allogeneic transfusion, longer use of steroids, cages, and types of surgical approaches as risk factors for reoperation. Clinicians can conduct comprehensive risk assessment of early reoperation in patients who will undergo instrumented spinal fusion surgery for degenerative spinal disease using this model.
Collapse
|
6
|
[Comparative study of microscope assisted minimally invasive anterior fusion and mobile microendoscopic discectomy assisted fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases]. ZHONGGUO XIU FU CHONG JIAN WAI KE ZA ZHI = ZHONGGUO XIUFU CHONGJIAN WAIKE ZAZHI = CHINESE JOURNAL OF REPARATIVE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY 2022; 36:672-680. [PMID: 35712923 PMCID: PMC9240834 DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202202039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the effectiveness of microscope assisted anterior lumbar discectomy and fusion (ALDF) and mobile microendoscopic discectomy assisted lumbar interbody fusion (MMED-LIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases. METHODS A clinical data of 163 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases who met the criteria between January 2018 and December 2020 was retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-three cases were treated with microscope assisted ALDF (ALDF group) and 110 cases with MMED-LIF (MMED-LIF group). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, age, disease type, surgical segments, preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of low back pain and leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), intervertebral space height, lordosis angle, and spondylolisthesis rate of the patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospital stay of the two groups were recorded. The effectiveness was evaluated by VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain and ODI. Postoperative lumbar X-ray films were taken to observe the position of Cage and measure the intervertebral space height, lordosis angle, and spondylolisthesis rate of the patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis. RESULTS The operations were successfully completed in both groups. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospital stay in ALDF group were less than those in MMED-LIF group ( P<0.05). The patients in both groups were followed up 12-36 months, with an average of 24 months. The VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain and ODI after operation were lower than those before operation in the two groups, and showed a continuous downward trend, with significant differences between different time points ( P<0.05). There were significant differences between two groups in VAS score of low back pain and ODI ( P<0.05) and no significant difference in VAS score of leg pain ( P>0.05) at each time point. The improvement rates of VAS score of low back pain and ODI in ALDF group were significantly higher than those in MMED-LIF group ( t=7.187, P=0.000; t=2.716, P=0.007), but there was no significant difference in the improvement rate of VAS score of leg pain ( t=0.556, P=0.579). The postoperative lumbar X-ray films showed the significant recovery of the intervertebral space height, lordosis angle, and spondylolisthesis rate at 2 days after operation when compared with preoperation ( P<0.05), and the improvements were maintained until last follow-up ( P>0.05). The improvement rates of intervertebral space height and lordosis angle in ALDF group were significantly higher than those in MMED-LIF group ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the reduction rate of spondylolisthesis between the two groups ( t=1.396, P=0.167). During follow-up, there was no loosening or breakage of the implant and no displacement or sinking of the Cage. CONCLUSION Under appropriate indications, microscope assisted ALDF and MMED-LIF both can achieve good results for lumbar degenerative diseases. Microscope assisted ALDF was superior to MMED-LIF in the improvement of low back pain and function and the recovery of intervertebral space height and lordosis angle.
Collapse
|