A comparison of the visual acuity outcome between Clearkone and RGP lenses

Visual Acuity Examination Methodology in Keratoconus

Visual acuity is one of the most important parameters for evaluating the vision of patients with keratoconus. This study reviewed 295 articles related to keratoconus published between 2017 and 2022 in which visual acuity was one of the parameters measured. The methodology of visual acuity testing in studies on keratoconus was thoroughly analyzed. The analysis showed that the most commonly indicated chart for testing visual acuity papers on keratoconus is the Snellen chart. It was shown that in 150 out of 295 articles, the authors do not describe the methodology for testing visual acuity. What is more, it was also shown that in 68 of the 295 articles which were analyzed, a procedure for converting visual acuity tested with a Snellen chart into a logMAR scale was used. In this review, we discuss the validity and reliability of such conversions. In particular, we show that insufficient description of visual acuity testing methodology and lack of information on the conversion of visual acuity results into the logMAR scale may contribute to the misinterpretation of visual acuity test results.

Results of the Pinhole Test Correlate with Hybrid Contact Lens Visual Acuity in Patients with Visual Impairment due to Corneal Diseases

Introduction. Trial rigid lens fitting is considered the best approach to determine whether the correction of residual defocus and irregular astigmatism might improve the visual acuity in patients with corneal disorders including keratoconus. This study aimed to analyze the correlation between hybrid lenses and pinhole visual acuity (VA). Methods. Patients undergoing hybrid contact lens fitting at the Hygeia Clinic, Poland, were included. The VA of each patient was assessed as decimal Snellen fractions under the following conditions: (i) uncorrected VA, (ii) VA with spherocylindrical correction (i.e., corrected distance VA), (iii) VA with a single 1.2 mm pinhole occluder, and (iv) VA with the best-fitted hybrid contact lens. Pearson’s correlation coefficient r was used to assess correlations among variables. Results. This study involved 29 eyes of 19 patients, mainly with advanced keratoconus. The uncorrected VA was 0.11 ± 0.10. The pinhole test provided significantly improved VA over corrected distance VA (0.51 ± 0.29 vs. 0.31 ± 0.20, respectively; $p<0.0001$ ). Similarly, the fitted hybrid contact lenses provided improved VA over corrected distance VA (0.66 ± 0.26 vs. 0.31 ± 0.20, respectively; $p<0.0001$ ). The pinhole VA was strongly correlated with the hybrid contact lens VA (r = 0.8135; 95% CI: 0.61–0.92; $p<0.0001$ ). The improvement in the pinhole test over corrected distance VA was moderately correlated with the improvement with the fitted lens over corrected distance VA (r = 0.6269; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.32–0.80; $p=0.0005$ ). Conclusions. A significant improvement in VA with the pinhole test is a simple predictor of general improvement with hybrid contact lenses. The pinhole test should be used in patients with corneal diseases such as keratoconus to determine whether optical aberrations associated with the disease cause their visual impairment.

Clinical effect of rigid gas permeable (RGP) contact lens in improving vision and controlling myopia progression of unilateral high myopic children

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to explore the clinical effect of the RGP contact lens in improving vision and controlling myopia progression of the unilateral high myopic children.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis case series study, we analyzed the clinical data for 23 subjects with unilateral high myopic children under 6 years old, with the spherical equivalent refractive error of the myopic eye from -5.0 D to -12.0 D, who were enrolled from the outpatient clinic at Beijing Tongren Hospital, China. Fourteen subjects could successfully fit the RGP contact lens, and nine subjects used the spectacle lens. Complete ocular examination was performed at the first visit at the clinic and every three months during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

In the RGP group, the change of axial length (AL) of the high myopic eye was from 25.62 ± 1.31 mm to 25.69 ± 1.31 mm after 12 months. The change of spherical equivalent (SE) was from -8.73 ± 2.54 D to -8.48 ± 2.77 D. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved from 0.24 ± 0.18 to 0.78 ± 0.26. In the spectacle group, the change of AL was from 24.76 ± 0.56 mm to 24.94 ± 0.71 mm. The change of SE was from -6.16 ± 2.86 D to -9.45 ± 2.06 D. The improvement of BCVA was from 0.52 ± 0.15 to 0.72 ± 0.23.

CONCLUSIONS

Wearing RGP lens in the children with unilateral high myopia is a safe, convenient and effective method to improve the best corrected vision and controlling myopia progression.

Keratoconus: An updated review

Keratoconus is a bilateral and asymmetric disease which results in progressive thinning and steeping of the cornea leading to irregular astigmatism and decreased visual acuity. Traditionally, the condition has been described as a noninflammatory disease; however, more recently it has been associated with ocular inflammation. Keratoconus normally develops in the second and third decades of life and progresses until the fourth decade. The condition affects all ethnicities and both sexes. The prevalence and incidence rates of keratoconus have been estimated to be between 0.2 and 4,790 per 100,000 persons and 1.5 and 25 cases per 100,000 persons/year, respectively, with highest rates typically occurring in 20- to 30-year-olds and Middle Eastern and Asian ethnicities. Progressive stromal thinning, rupture of the anterior limiting membrane, and subsequent ectasia of the central/paracentral cornea are the most commonly observed histopathological findings. A family history of keratoconus, eye rubbing, eczema, asthma, and allergy are risk factors for developing keratoconus. Detecting keratoconus in its earliest stages remains a challenge. Corneal topography is the primary diagnostic tool for keratoconus detection. In incipient cases, however, the use of a single parameter to diagnose keratoconus is insufficient, and in addition to corneal topography, corneal pachymetry and higher order aberration data are now commonly used. Keratoconus severity and progression may be classified based on morphological features and disease evolution, ocular signs, and index-based systems. Keratoconus treatment varies depending on disease severity and progression. Mild cases are typically treated with spectacles, moderate cases with contact lenses, while severe cases that cannot be managed with scleral contact lenses may require corneal surgery. Mild to moderate cases of progressive keratoconus may also be treated surgically, most commonly with corneal cross-linking. This article provides an updated review on the definition, epidemiology, histopathology, aetiology and pathogenesis, clinical features, detection, classification, and management and treatment strategies for keratoconus.

CLEAR - Medical use of contact lenses

The medical use of contact lenses is a solution for many complex ocular conditions, including high refractive error, irregular astigmatism, primary and secondary corneal ectasia, disfiguring disease, and ocular surface disease. The development of highly oxygen permeable soft and rigid materials has extended the suitability of contact lenses for such applications. There is consistent evidence that bandage soft contact lenses, particularly silicone hydrogel lenses, improve epithelial healing and reduce pain in persistent epithelial defects, after trauma or surgery, and in corneal dystrophies. Drug delivery applications of contact lens hold promise for improving topical therapy. Modern scleral lens practice has achieved great success for both visual rehabilitation and therapeutic applications, including those requiring retention of a tear reservoir or protection from an adverse environment. This report offers a practical and relevant summary of the current evidence for the medical use of contact lenses for all eye care professionals including optometrists, ophthalmologists, opticians, and orthoptists. Topics covered include indications for use in both acute and chronic conditions, lens selection, patient selection, wear and care regimens, and recommended aftercare schedules. Prevention, presentation, and management of complications of medical use are reviewed.

Current perspectives in the management of keratoconus with contact lenses

Our aim is to review current and significant articles on contact lens wear in keratoconus patients. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed was performed for the following topics on contact lens wear in keratoconus patients: (1) characteristics of contact lens wearers, (2) safety and efficacy, (3) complications, (4) fitting techniques, (5) contact lens wear after procedures/surgeries, (6) patient satisfaction. A total of 104 studies were finally selected and reviewed. Gas permeable (GP) lens wear provided significantly better vision than glasses. Special cone design lenses had better patient comfort levels though there was no difference in best corrected visual acuity among the GP lenses. Soft lenses showed good efficacy for the treatment of mild-to-moderate keratoconus with newer designs improving visual performance such as customised hydrogel and novel pinhole lenses. Scleral and hybrid lenses provide good visual acuity and comfort for keratoconic patients previously intolerant to RGP lenses. RGP lens wear post-cross linking (CXL) is relatively well-tolerated. Contact lenses may still be required post intrastromal corneal ring procedures and post keratoplasty. Scheimpflug imaging and anterior segment optical coherent tomography (ASOCT) are useful in contact lens fitting. Computerized contact lens fitting techniques could reduce the chair time of lens fitting as well as improve comfort and visual performance. Contact lenses play an important role in the visual rehabilitation of keratoconus patients. New contact lens designs and materials have significantly expanded the available fitting options for keratoconus patients. Imaging technology can be utilized to guide contact lens fitting.

Evaluation of Visual Acuity Outcomes and Corneal Alterations of New Generation Hybrid Contact Lenses in Patients With Advanced Keratoconus

PURPOSE

To evaluate the visual and corneal outcomes of new generation hybrid contact lenses (HCL) in patients with advanced keratoconus.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study undertaken at a single academic center. The study cohort consisted of subjects with advanced keratoconus who had elected not to undergo keratoplasty and were fitted with HCLs. Patients were fitted either with EyeBrid (LCS, Cane, France) or Airflex (SwissLens, Prilly, Switzerland) HCLs. Primary outcome measures included contact lens (CL) drop-out rate, best corrected visual acuity, and corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) measurements at the end of a 6-month HCL wear. ECD was measured using in vivo confocal microscopy (ConfoScan4; Nidek, Tokyo, Japan). One eye per patient was included for statistical purposes. Paired t tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for comparative analyses.

RESULTS

Thirty-two keratoconic eyes of 32 patients (14M/18F) with a mean age of 25.9 ± 11.5 years were included in the study. All patients were able to continue CL wear for a duration of 6 months. There was a significant improvement in the mean best corrected visual acuity from 0.5 ± 0.2 logarithm of minimal angle of resolution to 0.1 ± 0.1 logarithm of minimal angle of resolution after daily CL wear with HCL at the 6-month follow-up visit (P < 0.001). No vision-threatening CL-related corneal adverse effects were observed. There was no significant reduction in the ECD noted at the 6-month visit [2625.8 ± 300.3 cells/mm (baseline) vs. 2566.4 ± 309.8 cells/mm (6-month); P = 0.623].

CONCLUSIONS

Hybrid contact lenses can provide improved visual function without inducing any short-term clinical or microscopic adverse effects on corneal endothelial cells in patients with advanced keratoconus.