Endodontic Specialists’ Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic One Year After the Initial Outbreak

Incidence of Middle Mesial Canals in Mandibular Molars during Root Canal Treatment and Nonsurgical Retreatment

INTRODUCTION

Large-scale clinical studies on the incidence of middle mesial canals (MMCs) in nonsurgical root canal treatment (RCT) and retreatment of mandibular molars are lacking. The primary aim of this observational study was to determine the incidence of MMCs in mandibular first and second molars that received RCT or nonsurgical retreatment (NSRetx). The secondary aim was to determine factors associated with incidence of MMCs.

METHODS

Included were 3018 mandibular molars that received RCT (n = 1624) or NSRetx (n = 1394) by 3 endodontists in a private practice. Demographic and procedural data were collected. Bivariate and multivariable (Poisson regression model) analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Incidence of MMCs was 8.8% (n = 267). Although the bivariate analysis showed that NSRetx was significantly associated with incidence of MMCs, this association did not reach the threshold for statistical significance after controlling for all covariates (P = .07). Multivariable analysis on the entire cohort showed that incidence of MMCs was significantly associated with younger age (risk ratio [RR] = 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-2.06), male gender (RR = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.18-1.85), preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) (RR = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.17-1.89), and first molar (RR = 2.30; 95% CI:1.74-3.05). Subgroup multivariable analyses revealed that incidence of MMCs was associated with male gender only in the RCT group (RR = 2.26; 95% CI, 1.55-3.30) but not in the NSRetx group (RR = 1.11; 95% CI, 0.82, 1.50); and with preoperative CBCT only in the NSRetx group (RR = 1.78; 95% CI, 1.28, 2.50) but not in the RCT group (RR = 1.10; 95% CI, 0.71, 1.69). Associations with younger age and first molar remained unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall incidence of MMCs was 8.8%. Incidence of MMCs was significantly higher in younger patients and in mandibular first molars but was not associated with the type of treatment.

Cracked Teeth and Vertical Root Fractures in Pandemic Crisis - Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Dental fatigue fractures are the result of occlusal overloads occurring because of increased intensity of occlusal forces or decreased resistance of dental hard tissues to habitual occlusal forces. In the COVID-19 pandemic, occlusal stress has increased significantly, and so has the number of dental fractures. The study has the aim to determine if the number of cases of dental fatigue fractures during the pandemic crisis was higher than in the immediately preceding period.

METHODOLOGY

The retrospective study was carried out in a private dental clinic, selecting from the case series presented during March 2019-March 2021 the cases of dental fatigue fractures presented for diagnosis and treatment. The data collected from the patients included the reason for the presentation, the dental and medical history, and results from dental examination and radiological data. The statistical analysis was carried out with Microsoft Excel and SPSS software.

RESULTS

The study included 644 patients, 430 women and 214 men, with ages between 25 and 85 years (61±7.4 years). From a total of 2581 visits, 1534 visits were made to 383 patients between March 2019 and March 2020, and 1047 visits were made to 261 patients between March 2020 and March 2021, the number of visits decreasing by 31.75% during the pandemic. During the pandemic, the number of fractured teeth tripled, increasing from 0.53% to 1.53% (p=0.009). The most affected teeth were the maxillary premolars and the permanent first molar, both mandibular and maxillary. In most cases, the indication for treatment was extraction.

CONCLUSIONS

The Sars-Cov2 virus pandemic crisis has significantly increased the number of teeth with dental fatigue fractures presented to the dental office for diagnosis and treatment.

Validity and reliability of artificial intelligence chatbots as public sources of information on endodontics

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the validity and reliability of responses provided by GPT-3.5, Google Bard, and Bing to frequently asked questions (FAQs) in the field of endodontics.

METHODOLOGY

FAQs were formulated by expert endodontists (n = 10) and collected through GPT-3.5 queries (n = 10), with every question posed to each chatbot three times. Responses (N = 180) were independently evaluated by two board-certified endodontists using a modified Global Quality Score (GQS) on a 5-point Likert scale (5: strongly agree; 4: agree; 3: neutral; 2: disagree; 1: strongly disagree). Disagreements on scoring were resolved through evidence-based discussions. The validity of responses was analysed by categorizing scores into valid or invalid at two thresholds: The low threshold was set at score ≥4 for all three responses whilst the high threshold was set at score 5 for all three responses. Fisher's exact test was conducted to compare the validity of responses between chatbots. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess the reliability by assessing the consistency of repeated responses for each chatbot.

RESULTS

All three chatbots provided answers to all questions. Using the low-threshold validity test (GPT-3.5: 95%; Google Bard: 85%; Bing: 75%), there was no significant difference between the platforms (p > .05). When using the high-threshold validity test, the chatbot scores were substantially lower (GPT-3.5: 60%; Google Bard: 15%; Bing: 15%). The validity of GPT-3.5 responses was significantly higher than Google Bard and Bing (p = .008). All three chatbots achieved an acceptable level of reliability (Cronbach's alpha >0.7).

CONCLUSIONS

GPT-3.5 provided more credible information on topics related to endodontics compared to Google Bard and Bing.

Outcomes and predictive factors of vital pulp therapy in a large-scale retrospective cohort study over 10 years

This cohort study evaluated the long-term success/survival of vital pulp therapies (VPTs) after carious pulp exposure in adult teeth. Additionally, factors influencing long-term success were identified. Teeth treated during 2011-2022 in a private clinic were studied with clinical/radiographic follow-ups. Data included patient demographics, tooth specifics, and treatment details. Outcomes were classified as success/failure based on clinical/radiographic findings, with tooth functionality determining the survival rate. Encompassing 1149 patients and 1257 VPT-treated teeth, the average monitoring period was 42.2 months. Overall VPTs' survival and success rates were 99.1% and 91.6%, respectively. Success rates for 768 direct pulp cappings, 217 miniature pulpotomies, and 272 full pulpotomies were 91.9%, 92.6%, and 90.1%, respectively (P > 0.05). Influencing factors included symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (SIP; HR 1.974, 95% CI 1.242-3.137; P = 0.004), radiographic signs of apical periodontitis (AP; HR 2.983, 95% CI 1.961-4.540; P < 0.001), restoration type (HR 2.263, 95%CI 1.423-3.600; P = 0.001), and restoration surfaces (HR 1.401, 95%CI 1.034-1.899; P = 0.030). This study concludes that VPT techniques consistently exhibit high long-term success/survival rates in treating carious pulp exposures. Critical predictors include initial clinical signs of SIP/AP, caries extent, and use of composite restorations.

Flare-ups After Nonsurgical Retreatments: Incidence, Associated Factors, and Prediction

INTRODUCTION

The aims of this study were to determine the incidence, associated factors, and predictability of flare-ups after nonsurgical retreatments (NSRetx).

METHODS

All patients (n = 3,666) who received NSRetx by 3 endodontists in 2 endodontic offices during a period of 6 years (2016-2022) were included. Demographic, diagnostic, and procedural data were collected. A flare-up was defined as moderate-severe pain with/without swelling that took place within 14 days of initiation of NSRetx and resulted in an unscheduled appointment. Bivariate analyses on the entire cohort and multivariable analyses on cases with complete dataset (n = 2,846) were performed to identify significant associations. A Random Forest algorithm was used to make a prediction model.

RESULTS

Incidence of flare-ups was 3.95% (n = 145). Increased risk of flare-ups was associated with diabetes (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-3.97), mandibular teeth (AOR = 1.67; 95% CI, 1.11-2.52), moderate-severe preoperative pain on percussion (AOR = 2.13; 95% CI, 1.31-3.50), and pain on palpation (AOR = 1.63; 95% CI, 1.01-2.64). Lower risk of flare-up was associated with high blood pressure (AOR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21-0.82) (P < .05). The prediction model was not able to predict flare-ups with sufficient confidence (precision = 0.13).

CONCLUSIONS

Incidence of flare-ups following NSRetx was low (∼4%) and had a weak but significant association with the history of diabetes. Moderate-severe pain on percussion, pain on palpation (any intensity), and mandibular teeth had a significant association with flare-ups. The history of high blood pressure was associated with lower risk of flare-ups. Flare-ups were difficult to predict in this clinical setting.

Was the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Associated with an Increased Rate of Cracked Teeth?

INTRODUCTION

There is lack of data on whether the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was associated with changes in the etiology of pathosis in endodontic patients. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of cracks and other etiologic factors during the period of March 16th to May 31st in 2020 (COVID-19 initial outbreak) and 2021 (COVID-19 ongoing pandemic) compared with figures from the same period in 2019 (pre-COVID era) in 2 endodontists' practices.

METHODS

The etiologies of patients' chief complaints were determined from records of 2440 teeth (740 in 2019, 651 in 2020, and 1049 in 2021). Changes in the proportion of etiologic factors among all 3 periods were analyzed. The association between the rate of cracked teeth and patients' age and sex was determined using a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

The rates of all etiologies collectively during the studied periods showed a significant change (P < .0001). The rate of cracks significantly increased in 2020 (11.8%) (P = .0001) and 2021 (8%) (P = .0018) compared with 2019 (4.3%). The rate of persistent infections decreased in 2020 (22.3%) (P = .0013) and then increased in 2021 (27.5%) (P = .0153) compared with 2019 (30%). Cracked teeth were associated with the age group of 40-60 years (odds ratio [OR] = 1.882; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.063-3.330) in 2020 and with age ranges of 40-60 years (OR = 2.051; 95% CI, 1.120-3.759) and >60 years (OR = 2.038; 95% CI, 1.050-3.956) and male sex (OR = 1.599; 95% CI, 1.019-2.510) in 2021.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of cracked teeth increased during the initial outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic and 1 year later. This study provided evidence on the association between the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in the rate and presentation of endodontic etiologic factors.