Effect of Maternal and Pregnancy Risk Factors on Early Neonatal Death in Planned Home Births Delivering at Home

Home Birth in the United States: An Evidence-Based Ethical Analysis

AbstractThe assumption in current U.S. mainstream medicine is that birthing requires hospitalization. In fact, while the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists supports the right of every birthing person to make a medically informed decision about their delivery, they do not recommend home birth owing to data indicating greater neonatal morbidity and mortality. In this article, we examine the evidence surrounding home birth in the United States and its current limitations, as well as the ethical considerations around birth setting.

Complications of planned home births in the Czech Republic between 2016‒2017

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze the complications of planned home births treated at healthcare facilities in the Czech Republic.

METHODS

This prospective cohort observational study is based on analysis of women hospitalized with complications related to planned home deliveries in the Czech Republic between 2016 and 2017. The data were collected using an online form made accessible to the directors of all maternity hospitals in the Czech Republic. The results were statistically evaluated.

RESULTS

We identified 45 complications during planned home deliveries. Complications occurred most often among women living in largely populated cities with higher levels of education. Overall, 40% of patients did not receive routine antenatal care, and 38% of women gave birth after the 41st week of pregnancy. In 60% of cases, no professionals attended the birth. Hospital transfer frequencies were 42% after delivery, 36% at third-stage labour, 11% first-stage labour, 9% second-stage labour, and 2% before delivery. We recorded four neonatal deaths and one severe newborn morbidity. There was one maternal death unrelated to the home-birthing process and six cases of severe maternal haemorrhagic shock requiring intensive care.

CONCLUSION

Complications of planned home births occurred more frequently in women living in largely populated cities and with higher education levels. Planned home births were also observed among women who were at a higher risk of complications. Risk factors included nulliparity, postdate pregnancy, and lack of prenatal care. Hospital transfers occurred most often in the third stage of labour and postpartum.

A Public Health Ethics Analysis of the Criminalization of Direct Entry Midwifery

Multiple types of midwives practice in the United States, but regulation of midwifery practice varies by state. In some states, direct entry midwifery practice is unregulated or criminalized. Because regulations are the most burdensome of the public health interventions, they require the most stringent ethical critique. This article uses the most recent Public Health Code of Ethics to analyze the ethics of regulations that criminalize direct entry midwifery practice. The Code establishes 8 criteria for ethical actions: (1) permissibility, (2) respect, (3) reciprocity, (4) effectiveness, (5) responsible use of scarce resources, (6) proportionality, (7) accountability and transparency, and (8) public participation. Laws that criminalize direct entry midwifery practice violate all of these criteria and therefore cannot be considered an ethical approach to the state's duty to safeguard public health. The remedy for this problem is for all states to license and regulate all types of midwives that meet international standards of education and training.

Neonatal mortality in the United States is related to location of birth (hospital versus home) rather than the type of birth attendant

BACKGROUND

Planned home births have leveled off in the United States in recent years after a significant rise starting in the mid-2000s. Planned home births in the United States are associated with increased patient-risk profiles. Multiple studies concluded that, compared with hospital births, absolute and relative risks of perinatal mortality and morbidity in US planned home births are significantly increased.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the safety of birth in the United States by comparing the neonatal mortality outcomes of 2 locations, hospital birth and home birth, by 4 types of attendants: hospital midwife; certified nurse-midwife at home; direct-entry ("other") midwife at home; and attendant at home not identified, using the most recent US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention natality data on neonatal mortality for planned home births in the United States. Outcomes are presented as absolute risks (neonatal mortality per 10,000 live births) and as relative risks of neonatal mortality (hospital-certified nurse-midwife odds ratio, 1) overall, and for recognized risk factors.

STUDY DESIGN

We used the most current US Centers for Disease and Prevention Control Linked Birth and Infant Death Records for 2010-2017 to assess neonatal mortality (neonatal death days 0-27 after birth) for single, term (37+ weeks), normal-weight ( >2499 g) infants for planned home births and hospital births by birth attendants: hospital-certified nurse-midwives, home-certified nurse-midwives, home other midwives (eg, lay or direct-entry midwives), and other home birth attendant not identified.

RESULTS

The neonatal mortality for US hospital midwife-attended births was 3.27 per 10,000 live births, 13.66 per 10,000 live births for all planned home births, and 27.98 per 10,000 live births for unintended/unplanned home births. Planned home births attended by direct-entry midwives and by certified nurse-midwives had a significantly elevated absolute and relative neonatal mortality risk compared with certified nurse-midwife-attended hospital births (hospital-certified nurse-midwife: 3.27/10,000 live births odds ratio, 1; home birth direct-entry midwives: neonatal mortality 12.44/10,000 live births, odds ratio, 3.81, 95% confidence interval, 3.12-4.65, P<.0001; home birth-certified nurse-midwife: neonatal mortality 9.48/10,000 live births, odds ratio, 2.90, 95% confidence interval, 2.90; P<.0001). These differences increased further when patients were stratified for recognized risk factors.

CONCLUSION

The safety of birth in the United States varies by location and attendant. Compared with US hospital births attended by a certified nurse-midwife, planned US home births for all types of attendants are a less safe setting of birth, especially when recognized risk factors are taken into account. The type of midwife attending US planned home birth appears to have no differential effect on decreasing the absolute and relative risk of neonatal mortality of planned home birth, because the difference in outcomes of US planned home births attended by direct-entry midwives or by certified nurse-midwives is not statistically significant.

A pathway to establish a publicly funded home birth program in Australia

BACKGROUND

Home births provide women a birth choice where they may feel more comfortable and confident in their ability to give birth.

PROBLEM

Most women in Victoria do not have publicly funded access to appropriately trained health professionals if they choose to give birth at home.

METHODS

This paper describes the process of setting up a publicly funded home birth service and provide details of description of the set up and governance. We also report outcomes over 9 years with respect to parity, transfer to hospital, adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 191 women who were still booked into the home birth program at 36 weeks gestation, 148 (77.5%) women gave birth at home and 43 (22.5%) women were transferred into the hospital. The overall rate of vaginal birth was also high among the women in the home birth program, 185 (96.9%) with no added complications ascribed to home births. Such as severe perineal trauma [n=1] 0.6% PPH [n=4] 2.7%, Apgar score less than 7 at 5min [n=0] admissions post home birth to special care nursery [n=2] 1.35%.

DISCUSSION

This unique study provides a detailed road map of setting up a home birth practice to facilitate other institutions keen to build a publicly funded home birth service. The birth outcome data was found to be consistent with other Australian studies on low risk home births.

CONCLUSION

Well-designed home birth programs following best clinical practices and procedures can provide a safe birthing option for low risk women.