Noninvasive Fetal RhD Blood Group Genotyping: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations

Antenatal RHD screening to guide antenatal anti-D immunoprophylaxis in non-immunized D- pregnant women

In pregnancy, D- pregnant women may be at risk of becoming immunized against D when carrying a D+ fetus, which may eventually lead to hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Administrating antenatal and postnatal anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis decreases the risk of immunization substantially. Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping, based on testing cell-free DNA extracted from maternal plasma, offers a reliable tool to predict the fetal RhD phenotype during pregnancy. Used as a screening program, antenatal RHD screening can guide the administration of antenatal prophylaxis in non-immunized D- pregnant women so that unnecessary prophylaxis is avoided in those women who carry a D- fetus. In Europe, antenatal RHD screening programs have been running since 2009, demonstrating high test accuracies and program feasibility. In this review, an overview is provided of current state-of-the-art antenatal RHD screening, which includes discussions on the rationale for its implementation, methodology, detection strategies, and test performance. The performance of antenatal RHD screening in a routine setting is characterized by high accuracy, with a high diagnostic sensitivity of ≥99.9 percent. The result of using antenatal RHD screening is that 97-99 percent of the women who carry a D- fetus avoid unnecessary prophylaxis. As such, this activity contributes to avoiding unnecessary treatment and saves valuable anti-D immunoglobulin, which has a shortage worldwide. The main challenges for a reliable noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping assay are low cell-free DNA levels, the genetics of the Rh blood group system, and choosing an appropriate detection strategy for an admixed population. In many parts of the world, however, the main challenge is to improve the basic care for D- pregnant women.

Noninvasive screening of fetal RHD genotype in Chinese pregnant women with serologic RhD-negative phenotype

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping has been provided to nonimmunized RhD-negative pregnant women to guide anti-D prophylaxis. Among the Chinese, more than 30% of the RhD-negative phenotype is associated with variant RHD alleles, which would limit the accuracy of fetal RHD status prediction; thus, more targeting and proper programs need to be developed.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction PCR (qPCR) or Sanger sequencing on all RHD exons was used to detect maternal RHD genotypes. For pregnant women with RHD*01N.01 or RHD*01N.03 alleles, the presence of RHD exons 5 and 10 in cell-free DNA was determined by qPCR. For pregnant women with the RHD(1227G>A) allele, high-throughput sequencing on exon 9 of the RHD gene and RHCE gene was used to predict fetal RhD phenotype.

RESULTS

Among 65 cases of Chinese pregnant women with the serologic RhD-negative phenotype, three major genotypes were identified: RHD*01N.01/RHD*01N.01 (61.5%), RHD*01N.01/RHD(1227G>A) or RHD*01N.03/RHD(1227G>A) (20%), and RHD*01N.01/RHD*01N.03 (13.8%), along with three cases of minor genotypes (4.6%). For 43 pregnant women with the RHD*01N.01 or RHD*01N.03 alleles, qPCR on maternal cell-free DNA yielded a 98.5% (42/43) accuracy rate and 100% successful prediction rate. High-throughput sequencing was successfully used to predict fetal RhD phenotypes for 13 pregnant women with RHD(1227G>A).

CONCLUSION

On the basis of maternal RHD genotyping, fetal genotyping through qPCR or high-throughput sequencing can improve the accuracy and success rate of prenatal fetal RhD phenotype prediction among Chinese pregnant women. It plays a potential role in guiding anti-D prophylaxis and pregnancy management in Chinese pregnant women.

Cost-effectiveness of noninvasive fetal RhD blood group genotyping in nonalloimmunized and alloimmunized pregnancies

BACKGROUND

We sought to determine the cost-effectiveness of noninvasive fetal RhD blood group genotyping in nonalloimmunized and alloimmunized pregnancies in Canada.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We developed two probabilistic state-transition (Markov) microsimulation models to compare fetal genotyping followed by targeted management versus usual care (i.e., universal Rh immunoglobulin [RhIG] prophylaxis in nonalloimmunized RhD-negative pregnancies, or universal intensive monitoring in alloimmunized pregnancies). The reference case considered a healthcare payer perspective and a 10-year time horizon. Sensitivity analysis examined assumptions related to test cost, paternal screening, subsequent pregnancies, other alloantibodies (e.g., K, Rh c/C/E), societal perspective, and lifetime horizon.

RESULTS

Fetal genotyping in nonalloimmunized pregnancies (at per-sample test cost of C$247/US$311) was associated with a slightly higher probability of maternal alloimmunization (22 vs. 21 per 10,000) and a reduced number of RhIG injections (1.427 vs. 1.795) than usual care. It was more expensive (C$154/US$194, 95% Credible Interval [CrI]: C$139/US$175-C$169/US$213) and had little impact on QALYs (0.0007, 95%CrI: -0.01-0.01). These results were sensitive to the test cost (threshold achieved at C$88/US$111), and inclusion of paternal screening. Fetal genotyping in alloimmunized pregnancies (at test cost of C$328/US$413) was less expensive (-C$6280/US$7903, 95% CrI: -C$6325/US$7959 to -C$6229/US$7838) and more effective (0.19 QALYs, 95% CrI 0.17-0.20) than usual care. These cost savings remained robust in sensitivity analyses.

DISCUSSION

Noninvasive fetal RhD genotyping saves resources and represents good value for the management of alloimmunized pregnancies. If the cost of genotyping is substantially decreased, the targeted intervention can become a viable option for nonalloimmunized pregnancies.