Zirconia abutments for single-tooth implants--rationale and clinical guidelines

Monolithic hybrid abutment crowns (screw-retained) versus monolithic hybrid abutments with adhesively cemented monolithic crowns

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to compare monolithic hybrid abutment crowns (screw-retained) versus monolithic hybrid abutments with adhesively cemented monolithic single-tooth crowns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty subjects in need of an implant-borne restoration were randomly assigned to receive either a cement-retained (CRR) or a screw-retained (SRR) implant-supported monolithic lithium disilicate (LS₂ ) reconstruction. Each patient received a titanium implant with in internal conic connection. After osseointegration and second-stage surgery, healing abutments were placed for about 10 days. The type of restoration (CRR vs. SRR) was randomly assigned, and the restorations were manufactured of monolithic LS₂ . Both types of restorations, CRR and SRR, were based on a titanium component (Ti-base) that was bonded to the abutment (CRR) or the crown (SRR). The follow-up period for all restoration was 36 months. Clinical outcome was evaluated according to Functional Implant Prosthetic Score (FIPS). Quality of live (OHIP) and patient's satisfaction were assessed using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Primary endpoint was loss of restoration for any reason. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed and log-rank testing was performed (p < .05).

RESULTS

One restoration of group CRR failed after 6 months due to loss of adhesion between Ti-base and individual abutment. No further biological or technical failures occurred. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference between both treatment options (p = .317). There was no statistically significant difference between both types of restoration, neither for FIPS, OHIP, treatment time nor patient satisfaction (p > .05).

CONCLUSION

Monolithic hybrid abutment crowns (screw-retained) and monolithic hybrid abutment with adhesively cemented monolithic crowns using lithium disilicate showed no statistically significant difference for implant-based reconstructions in this pilot RCT setting.

Abutment margin levels and residual cement occurrence in cement-retained implant restorations: An observational study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the association between different vertical levels of the abutment margin and residual cement prevalence in cement-retained implant restorations with customized abutments.

METHODS

One hundred and nine single-unit cement-retained implant restorations with a screw-access channel were included. The crowns were intraorally cemented on the abutments, and excess cement was removed. The abutment-crown complex was unscrewed, and the abutment-crown complex and peri-implant tissue were photographed. Residual cement presence was recorded by dividing the abutment-crown complex and peri-implant tissue into four quadrants: mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual. The prevalence of residual cement was compared according to the height of the custom abutment margin of the corresponding quadrant. A multilevel model was used for statistical analysis (α = .05).

RESULTS

Cement remnants were discovered on 72.48% of the dental implants. When the restoration quadrants were compared, cement remnants were present on 51.38%, 39.45%, 20.18%, and 17.43% of the mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual surfaces, respectively (p < .01). Regarding the abutment margin level, cement residues were found in 60.22% and 61.4% of the 0.5 mm subgingival and ≥1 mm subgingival margin groups, respectively, which were significantly more than those in the supragingival (23.65%) and equigingival (26.59%) margin groups (p < .01). After adjustment for confounding factors, the adjusted odds ratio (with 95% confidence interval) for residual cement in the subgingival margin groups was 3.664 (1.71, 7.852) when compared to the supragingival and equigingival margin groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of residual cement occurrence was 3.66-fold higher with a subgingival abutment margin than with supragingival and equigingival abutment margins.

Biocompatibility of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconium Oxide Ceramics with Different Surface Topographies for Dental Implant Abutments

Gingivafibroblasts were cultured on lithium disilicate, on zirconia dioxide, and on titanium with two different surface roughnesses (0.2 µm and 0.07 µm); Proliferation (MTT), Living/Dead staining, cytotoxicity (LDH), proliferation (FGF2), and inflammation (TNFα) were analyzed after 1 day and 21 days. Furthermore, alteration in cell morphology (SEM) was analyzed. The statistical analysis was performed by a Kruskal-Wallis test. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. There were no distinct differences in cellular behavior between the tested roughness. There were slight differences between tested materials. Cells grown on zirconia dioxide showed higher cytotoxic effects. Cells grown on lithium disilicate showed less expression of TNFα compared to those grown on zirconia dioxide or titanium. These effects persisted only during the first time span. The results indicate that the two tested high-strength ceramics and surface properties are biologically suitable for transmucosal implant components. The findings may help clinicians to choose the most appropriate biomaterial as well as the most appropriate surface treatment to use in accordance with specific clinical dental applications.

Time-dependent reactive oxygen species inhibit Streptococcus mutans growth on zirconia after a helium cold atmospheric plasma treatment

As an efficient strategy for the modification of material surfaces, cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) has been used in dentistry to improve hard and soft tissue integration of dental implant materials. We previously found the Streptococcus mutans growth was inhibited on the surface of zirconia implant abutment after a 60-second helium cold atmospheric plasma treatment. However, the mechanism of bacterial growth inhibition on CAP-treated zirconia has not been fully understood. The duration of bacterial inhibition effectiveness on CAP-treated zirconia has also been insufficiently examined. In this work, we assume that reactive oxygen species (ROS) are the primary cause of bacterial inhibition on CAP-treated zirconia. The ROS staining and an ROS scavenger were utilized to evaluate the bacterial intracellular ROS level, and to determine the role of ROS in bacterial growth inhibition when seeded on CAP-treated zirconia. The time-dependent effectiveness of CAP treatment was determined by changes in surface characteristics and antibacterial efficacy of zirconia with different storage times after CAP treatment. This study confirmed that the presence of reactive oxygen species on the zirconia surface after CAP treatment inhibits the growth of Streptococcus mutans on the material surface. Although the antibacterial efficacy of the 60-second CAP-treated zirconia decreased over time, there were fewer bacteria on the treated surface than those on the untreated surface after 14 days.

Exploring the use of pulsed erbium lasers to retrieve a zirconia crown from a zirconia implant abutment

Background

Removal of cement-retained implant fixed restorations when needed, can be challenging. Conventional methods of crown removal are time consuming and costly for patients and practitioners. This research explored the use of two different types of pulsed erbium lasers as a non-invasive tool to retrieve cemented zirconia crowns from zirconia implant abutments.

Materials and methods

Twenty identical zirconia crowns were cemented onto 20 identical zirconia prefabricated abutments using self-adhesive resin cement. The specimens were divided into two groups for laser assisted crown removal; G1 for erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser (Er:YAG), and G2 for erbium, chromium-doped yttrium, scandium, gallium and garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG). For the G1, after the first crown removal, the specimens were re-cemented and removed again using the Er:YAG laser. Times needed to remove the crowns were recorded and analyzed using ANOVA (α = 0.05). The surfaces of the crown and the abutment were further examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analyses.

Results

The average times of zirconia crown removal from zirconia abutments were 5 min 20 sec and 5 min 15 sec for the Er:YAG laser of first and second experiments (G1), and 5 min 55 sec for the Er,Cr:YSGG laser experiment (G2). No statistical differences were observed among the groups. SEM and EDS examinations of the materials showed no visual surface damaging or material alteration from the two pulsed erbium lasers.

Conclusions

Both types of pulsed erbium lasers can be viable alternatives for retrieving a zirconia crown from a zirconia implant abutment. Despite operating at different wavelengths, the Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG lasers, perform similarly in removing a zirconia crown from a zirconia implant abutment with similar parameters. There are no visual and elemental composition damages as a result of irradiation with pulsed erbium lasers.

Influence of anodized titanium abutments on the esthetics of the peri-implant soft tissue: A clinical study

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The grayish appearance of a titanium abutment discolors the peri-implant soft tissue, especially if the gingiva is thin. Whether an anodized titanium abutment can prevent the discoloration is unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this clinical study was to investigate the color change of peri-implant soft tissue surrounding a titanium abutment that had been colored by anodic oxidation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Commercially available titanium abutments were anodized to form a gold and pink titanium abutment and formed the experimental groups. Unanodized titanium and zirconia abutment were used as the control groups. Four types of abutments were fabricated for each participant who received dental implants in the anterior maxilla. The abutments and corresponding definitive crowns were inserted, and the color of the peri-implant soft tissue and contralateral gingiva were measured with a spectrophotometer. The thickness of the peri-implant soft tissue was recorded after probing with an endodontic file.

RESULTS

Eleven participants were included in this study. The color differences caused by all tested abutments were higher than the critical threshold of ΔE=3.7. The mean color difference (ΔE), from low to high, was the zirconia, pink-anodized titanium, gold-anodized titanium, and unanodized titanium abutment; their values of (ΔE) were 6.81, 7.63, 7.90, and 8.74, respectively. The mean thickness of the peri-implant soft tissue was 2.41 ±0.52 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitation of the small sample size in this study, the gold-anodized and pink-anodized titanium abutment achieved better esthetics for peri-implant soft tissue than the unanodized titanium abutment. Zirconia was the optimal abutment material for the esthetic region.

Fracture of Zirconia Abutments in Implant Treatments: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to identify and summarize clinical studies related to the fracture of zirconia abutments in implant treatments.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library searches were performed and complemented by manual searches from database inception to February 11, 2018, for title and abstract analysis.

RESULTS

Initially, 645 articles were obtained through database searches. Fifty-three articles were selected for full-text analysis, and 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. The selected studies were analyzed regarding fracture rate, abutment-implant connection, time point of fracture, location of critical crack, causes, managements, and preventive measures with respect to zirconia abutment fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower fracture rates were reported for internal connection with metal component (2-piece) zirconia abutments compared with external and internal full-zirconia connection (one-piece) zirconia abutments. Overpreparation and overload should be avoided in case of zirconia abutments.

Changes in the esthetic, physical, and biological properties of a titanium alloy abutment treated by anodic oxidation

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The grayish appearance of titanium abutments adversely affects peri-implant esthetics in patients with thin mucosa, impacting patient satisfaction with implant-supported restorations in esthetic regions.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to change the color of titanium alloys with anodic oxidation and to evaluate alterations in the esthetic, physical, and biological properties of the anodized titanium alloys.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Pink and yellow titanium alloys produced by anodization were the experimental groups, and the untreated titanium alloy and zirconia were used as the control groups. Pig gingiva was placed on the tested specimens to evaluate the esthetic effect by recording the color change in the gingiva. Physical properties including morphology, chemical composition, roughness, and contact angle were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, and a contact angle analysis system. Biological properties were evaluated by observing the cell behaviors of human gingival fibroblasts, using scanning electron microscopy, fluorescence microscopy, a live/dead viability assay, and a cell counting assay.

RESULTS

A variety of colors can be produced on the surfaces of titanium alloys by anodization at different voltages. Titanium alloys anodized at 60 and 65 V exhibited yellow and pink appearances, respectively. Color differences of gingiva caused by anodized titanium alloys were lower than those of the untreated titanium alloy, but they were higher than those of zirconia. Compared with the untreated titanium alloy, the anodized titanium alloys exhibited grain formation, a lower contact angle, and higher roughness. Cell morphology, proliferation, and viability on surfaces of anodized titanium alloys were similar to those of the untreated titanium alloy but lower than those of zirconia.

CONCLUSIONS

Anodization could change the color of titanium alloys to pink or yellow at different voltages. Grain formation, roughness, and hydrophilicity were increased after treatment. The esthetics and biocompatibility of anodized titanium alloys were not as good as that of zirconia, but the pink and yellow titanium alloys treated by anodization achieved better gingival esthetics than the untreated titanium alloy.

Impact of abutment material on peri-implant soft tissue color. An in vitro study

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the present study is to determine the differences in peri-implant soft tissue color with the utilization of titanium, titanium gold-plated, white zirconia, Vita Classical (VC) A4-shaded zirconia, and fluorescent white zirconia abutments and to establish the influence of gingival thickness on the resulting color.

METHODS

Four implants were contralaterally inserted in 19 fresh pig mandibles, and the color of the peri-implant mucosa with the different abutments was spectrophotometrically measured at 1-, 2-, and 3-mm height from the margin.

RESULTS

At 1-mm height, titanium significantly differed from all zirconia abutments in lightness (L*), chroma along red axis (a*), and chroma along yellow-blue axis (b*) parameters. At 2 mm, all zirconia abutments differed from titanium in b* but only fluorescent zirconia in a*. At 3 mm, titanium differed from VC A4-shaded and fluorescent zirconia abutments in b*. At soft tissue thicknesses <1 and 1-2 mm, titanium differed from fluorescent zirconia in a* and b* and from VC A4-shaded zirconia in b*; at thickness >2 mm, no differences were found among abutments. All abutments differed from natural teeth in a* and b* at all heights and thicknesses except for fluorescent zirconia at thickness >2 mm. The Euclidean distance (ΔΕ) differed between titanium abutments and gold, VC A4, and fluorescent zirconia at <1- and 1-2-mm thicknesses.

CONCLUSION

The natural gingival color was not reproduced with any abutment at gingival thicknesses <2 mm. The worst color match was with titanium abutments and the best with fluorescent zirconia, followed by VC A4-shaded zirconia. At gingival thicknesses >2 mm, no differences were detected among abutments.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study demonstrates that the type of abutment and the gingival thickness affect the resulting peri-implant gingival color.

Effects of different polishing protocols on the surface roughness of Y-TZP surfaces used for custom-made implant abutments: a controlled morphologic SEM and profilometric pilot study

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Limited information is available on how to treat the surface of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM)-derived implant abutments made of yttria tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP).

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess and compare 4 different standardized polishing protocols of dental zirconia with a standard handpiece and abrasives and to identify a standardized protocol to obtain a surface roughness of Ra=0.2 μm on dental Y-TZP.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty specimens of Y-TZP were produced and finished with 4 different polishing protocols with standard dental abrasives. Protocol Co used a coarse rubber abrasive, protocol Me used the rubber abrasive of protocol Co plus a medium rubber abrasive, protocol Fi used the polishing sequences of protocol Me plus a fine rubber abrasive, and protocol UF used protocol Me plus ultrafine high-gloss polishing. Ten machined titanium disks served as control (C). Roughness measurement and scanning electron microscopy was performed for each specimen and tested for differences with ANOVA with Bonferroni correction and the Student t test (α=.05).

RESULTS

In the zirconia groups, Co (Ra 0.29 ±0.38 μm) showed significantly higher Ra values than Me (Ra 0.22 ±0.38 μm; P=.003), Fi (Ra 0.17 ±0.37 μm; P<.001), and UF (Ra 0.07 ±0.06 μm; P<.001). UF showed the significantly lowest Ra values of all zirconia groups (Co and Me: P<.001, Fi: P=.002). Differences between Me and Fi were not significant (P=.116). Comparison of the 4 zirconia surfaces to the control group (C; Ra=0.17 ±0.03) revealed significant differences for Co (P<.001) and UF (P=.006) but not Me (P=1.000) and Fi (P=.055). In comparison with the literature-based optimal roughness of Ra=0.2 μm, significant differences were found for Co, Fi, and UF (P<.05), but not for Me (P=.117). However, the machined titanium surface (C) also showed significantly smoother Ra values than 0.2 μm (P<.05, Student t test).

CONCLUSIONS

A roughness of Ra=0.2 μm on zirconia can be achieved by following protocol Me, whereas a roughness comparable to machined titanium is present after protocol Fi.

Eleven-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective Study of Zirconia Implant Abutments Supporting Single All-Ceramic Crowns in Anterior and Premolar Regions

BACKGROUND

Clinical studies on zirconia abutments report very good survival rates and biological and technical results, but few have an observation period of more than 5 years.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the long-term performance of customized zirconia implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven patients receiving 54 single implants were included (25 incisors, 14 canines, 15 premolars in both jaws). Yttria-stabilized zirconia abutments were screwed to the implants with a defined torque. All-ceramic crowns were adhesively cemented onto the abutments. The implants, abutments, and crowns were clinically and radiographically examined after 11 years of use. Modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria were used to assess technical outcomes: fracture of abutment/crown framework/veneering ceramic, loosening of abutment screw/crown, marginal adaptation, anatomical form, occlusal wear, and abutment fit. The biological parameters were pocket probing depth, plaque control record, bleeding on probing, papilla index, and gingival/mucosal recession at implants and neighboring natural teeth. The cumulative success rate of abutments and crowns was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The results of the USPHS criteria were analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients with 31 zirconia abutments were examined at 11.3 (±0.9) years after implantation. No abutment or crown was lost. The cumulative success rate was 96.3% for abutments and 90.7% for crowns. Two abutment screws loosened, and three crowns exhibited minor chipping. There were no biological complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Customized zirconia single implant abutments exhibited excellent long-term outcomes in anterior and premolar regions.

Evaluation of removal forces of implant-supported zirconia copings depending on abutment geometry, luting agent and cleaning method during re-cementation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of different abutment geometries in combination with varying luting agents and the effectiveness of different cleaning methods (prior to re-cementation) regarding the retentiveness of zirconia copings on implants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Implants were embedded in resin blocks. Three groups of titanium abutments (pre-fabricated, height: 7.5 mm, taper: 5.7°; customized-long, height: 6.79 mm, taper: 4.8°; customized-short, height: 4.31 mm, taper: 4.8°) were used for luting of CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia copings with a semi-permanent (Telio CS) and a provisional cement (TempBond NE). Retention forces were evaluated using a universal testing machine. Furthermore, the influence of cleaning methods (manually, manually in combination with ultrasonic bath or sandblasting) prior to re-cementation with a provisional cement (TempBond NE) was investigated with the pre-fabricated titanium abutments (height: 7.5 mm, taper: 5.7°) and SEM-analysis of inner surfaces of the copings was performed. Significant differences were determined via two-way ANOVA.

RESULTS

Significant interactions between abutment geometry and luting agent were observed. TempBond NE showed the highest level of retentiveness on customized-long abutments, but was negatively affected by other abutment geometries. In contrast, luting with Telio CS demonstrated consistent results irrespective of the varying abutment geometries. Manual cleaning in combination with an ultrasonic bath was the only cleaning method tested prior to re-cementation that revealed retentiveness levels not inferior to primary cementation.

CONCLUSION

No superiority for one of the two cements could be demonstrated because their influences on retentive strength are also depending on abutment geometry. Only manual cleaning in combination with an ultrasonic bath offers retentiveness levels after re-cementation comparable to those of primary luting.

In vitro adherence of periodontopathic bacteria to zirconia and titanium surfaces

Tetragonal zirconia polycrystals (TZP) has drawn attention as a potential alternative to titanium (Ti) in dental implant treatment, as it minimizes both allergic reactions and esthetic problems. It is also important for dental implants to maintain plaque-free surfaces to prevent peri-implantitis. The purpose of this study was to investigate in vitro adherence of periodontopathic bacteria to TZP comparing with Ti.Periodontopathic bacteria were cultured on polished discs of two kinds of TZP, and Ti as a control. After incubation, the numbers of adherent bacteria were estimated. No significant differences among specimens were observed in the initial attachment, although a decrease was observed in initial attachment to saliva-coated specimens. In the bacterial colonization, no significant differences were recognized among specimens. The adherence of the periodontopathic bacteria on TZP was similar to that on Ti. These results suggest that a strategy is required for inhibition of the bacterial adherence to TZP.

Prosthodontic considerations in the implant-supported all-ceramic restoration of congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisor: a clinical report

The congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisor is the most common agenesis in the anterior region. There are several treatment options for this anomaly, which causes severe deficiencies: orthodontic space closure, tooth-supported restoration, or single-tooth implant. Each of these solutions has a high degree of success if used in the correct situation. An implant-supported restoration with an interdisciplinary approach provides a predictable outcome. This article describes the treatment of a patient with agenesis of the maxillary left lateral incisor. After orthodontic space management, it was decided to restore the tooth with an all-ceramic crown cemented on a zirconia custom abutment, which fractured after only 6 weeks of service. Fractographic analysis revealed that the failure was due to over-reduction of the buccal wall to correct the labial emergence of the implant. Zirconia abutments should be designed with even wall thicknesses of at least 0.8 mm to avoid areas that may compromise functional success.

Influence of zirconia abutment preparation on the fracture strength of single implant lithium disilicate crowns after chewing simulation

OBJECTIVE

The use of all-ceramic crowns over zirconia abutments is a well-established esthetic treatment option in implant dentistry; however, the effect of the mechanical processing due to abutment preparation has not been investigated under functional loading. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the influence of the zirconia abutment preparation depth and preparation mode on the fracture strength and fracture mode of lithium disilicate crowns after chewing simulation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy single implant-supported lithium disilicate glass-ceramic crowns (IPS e.max Press, Ivoclar Vivadent) were adhesively cemented (Multilink Automix, Ivoclar Vivadent) onto zirconia abutments (ZirDesign, Astra Tech) using implants with a diameter of 4.5 mm and a length of 15.0 mm (Osseospeed, Astra Tech). Study design concerned the replacement of a maxillary central incisor (11.0 mm in height and 8.0 mm in width). Subgroups (n = 7) were subjected to dynamic loading (C) up to 1.2 × 10(6) loading cycles at 135° with 98N in a thermomechanical chewing simulator (Kausimulator, Willytech); followed by quasi-static loading at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min until fracture in a universal testing machine (Z010/TN2S, Zwick). Additional subgroups were also subjected to quasi-static loading (S) at 135°. Lithium disilicate implant crowns were divided into five study groups (n = 14) according to the abutment preparation depth [A (control): 0.5 mm, B: 0.7 mm, C: 0.9 mm, and preparation mode [(No label): milling by the manufacturer, (P): copy-milling by the Celay System (Mikrona)].

RESULTS

All specimens survived dynamic loading and mean fracture strengths (N) after quasi-static loading were as follows: Group SA: 384 ± 84; Group CA: 403 ± 67; Group SB: 294 ± 95; Group CB: 374 ± 75; Group SC: 332 ± 52; Group CC: 373 ± 105; Group SPB: 332 ± 80; Group CPB: 499 ± 91; Group SPC: 380 ± 101; and Group CPC: 358 ± 54.

CONCLUSIONS

Statistical analysis using multiple linear regression showed that both the preparation depth and mode had no influence on the fracture strength of the implant crowns (P > 0.05); however, fracture strength increased statistically significantly after 5 years chewing simulation (P = 0.01).

Spectrophotometric assessment of peri-implant mucosa after restoration with zirconia abutments veneered with fluorescent ceramic: a controlled, retrospective clinical study

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the optical appearance of the soft tissue labial to dental implants restored with fluorescent ceramic-veneered zircona abutments. It was hypothesized that the tested abutment design leads to an increased brightness in the marginal peri-implant tissue, which does not differ from that of natural teeth. Moreover, a reduction of the color difference that has been reported from other abutment materials was expected.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 12 patients with single titanium implants in the maxillary anterior region were recruited. All implants (N = 12) were restored with zirconia abutments veneered with fluorescent ceramic and full-ceramic crowns. Color measurements of the peri-implant mucosa at the test sites were made of the facial aspect of the teeth using a Spectroshade-spectrophotometer. The gingiva of a contralateral or adjacent natural tooth served as a control. Color data (CIE-L*a*b* color coordinates) were obtained in five incremental areas of 1 × 2 mm in both test and control sites. ∆E-values were calculated from the ΔL*, Δa* and Δb* values for each patient.

RESULTS

Data acquisition from the test site demonstrated lower mean values of L*, a* and b* than the control site. Statistical significance between the test site and control site was reached in the L* values only in the second of the five incremental areas (P < 0.05, Wilcoxon test). However, discrepancies in a*- and b*-values reached a statistically significant difference in the incremental areas 1, 2 and 4, and in b* in area 5 (P < 0.05, Wilcoxon test). Medians of the ∆E-values in all five increments were found to be higher than the clinical perceptual threshold of 3.7. However, considering the original data, five individual patients did not reach the threshold in increment 1 and 2, two in increment 3 and three in increment 4. None of the patients showed lower ∆E-values than the perceptual threshold of 3.7 in increment 5, which had the largest distance from the gingival margin.

CONCLUSION

The tested abutment design leads to a peri-implant soft tissue color that, in the critical marginal area, in five of 12 patients did not statistically differ from the tissue of the gingiva of natural teeth. Particularly, the brightness of the peri-implant soft-tissue seemed to be more adapted to the natural situation using a fluorescent abutment design.

A Method for Obtaining Peri-Implant Soft-Tissue Contours by Using Screw-Retained Provisional Restorations as Impression Copings: A Clinical Report

In the esthetic zone, remodeling of the peri-implant soft-tissue contours through the use of provisional restorations is one of the imperative key factors for optimizing outcomes. Several methods have been described to produce the desired peri-implant soft-tissue contours using customized impression copings or cement-retained provisional crowns. The aim of this article is to present an alternative method for obtaining the desired peri-implant soft-tissue contours by using screw-retained provisional restorations as impression copings, which facilitates the definitive prosthesis fabrication.