Can a Facial Injury Severity Scale Be Used to Predict the Need for Surgical Intervention and Time of Hospitalization?

Complicated Facial Lacerations: Challenges in the Repair and Management of Complications by a Facial Trauma Team

Study Design: This is a descriptive study where we present our experience in managing complicated facial wounds over a period of 1 year at a level 1 trauma centre by a dedicated facial trauma team consisting of a plastic surgeon, a trauma surgeon and a Maxillofacial surgeon. Objective: Facial deformities have profound impact on the social and psychological aspect of a person's life. Hence, management of facial wounds is very crucial. Most of the facial injuries are usually managed by emergency care physician and emergency surgeon. But certain wounds require specialised knowledge and care due to their complicated nature. The objective of this paper is to highlight those special types of wounds and the challenges they pose. It also aims to enumerate the best possible management according to each situation in a protocol-based manner, which will help in decision making by the attending emergency physician/surgeon. Methods: Facial lacerations were designated as "complicated" according to some pre-defined features and pre, intra and post operative data and photographs were collected by interviewing the concerned surgical team. The data were analysed and presented as different clinical scenarios. Results: The cases were broadly grouped under 6 scenarios according to the unique combination of difficulties faced and their specific management. The challenges faced were enumerated and the steps undertaken were also mentioned against them. Lastly, the scenarios were compared with available literature to find out the best possible management in each situation and to present them in a protocol-based manner. Conclusion: Protocol-based management of injuries to the different parts and specialised structures of the face is extremely helpful. Role of a specialised facial trauma team also should be emphasised in complicated facial injuries.

Correlating the Bony Facial Trauma Score with Clinical Outcomes

Background: In 2017, the Bony Facial Trauma Score (BFTS) was developed to quantify and describe bony trauma of the face. Objective: To compare BFTSs for the need of hospital admission, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, surgery, tracheostomy tube placement, cervical spine (c-spine) injury, and mortality. Methods: A retrospective review of patients sustaining bony facial trauma from January 1, 2017 to November 30, 2019 was done. Logistic regression modeling measured the association between BFTS and admission status, need for operative repair, tracheostomy, mortality, ICU admission, and c-spine injury. Results: Three hundred six patients were included for this analysis. Median BFTS was 3.5 (interquartile range, 5), while the average age was 45.0 years (standard deviation, 22.3). The most common mechanisms of injury were motor vehicle accident (44.8%) and ground-level fall (32.5%). BFTS was found to correlate with the following (p < 0.05): admission (odds ratio [OR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.13), mortality (OR 1.05, 1.00-1.10), tracheostomy (OR 1.11, 1.07-1.17), operative management (OR 1.16, 1.11-1.22), ICU (OR 1.07, 1.03-1.11), and c-spine injury (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.11). Conclusion: A significant correlation was found between BFTS and all the outcomes investigated.

Can an App-Based Maxillofacial Trauma Score Predict the Operative Time, ICU Need and Length of Stay?

Study Design

Retrospective chart review.

Objective

Injury and trauma scores are the mainstay of predicting outcomes of trauma patients. ZS (Zeeshan and Simon) maxillofacial trauma score is based on 4 previous facial trauma scores and is user friendly, app-based visually coded facial trauma scoring system. Our study was designed to seek the application of an app-based ZS maxillofacial trauma score to predict the operative time, intensive care unit (ICU) need and length of stay.

Methods

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who presented to a university medical college teaching hospital with maxillofacial fractures from October 2018 until October 2019. ZS maxillofacial trauma scoring app was used to calculate the ZS maxillofacial trauma severity score, which was our primary predictor variable. Our primary outcome of interest was operative time. Our secondary outcome of interest was ICU need and length of stay. Correlation analysis, linear regression and logistic regression were performed for statistical analysis. A statistical P-value of .05 was considered significant at a 95% confidence interval.

Results

There were 95 male and 5 female patients included in the study. The age ranged from 3 to 84 years with a mean of 30.76 (SD = 14.04). A statistically significant correlation between the ZS score and operative time (r = 0.67, P < .001) was observed. ZS score predicted operative time (b 1 = 7.67, P < .001) in our study sample. Increasing ZS trauma score was also significantly associated with ICU requirement (X 2 (3) = 13.682, P = .003), but the length of stay could not be predicted based on ZS score.Conclusions: ZS maxillofacial trauma score can predict the operative time, and an association was seen with the need for ICU with increasing ZS score, but could not predict the length of stay or the ICU need. It has potential for future integration with electronic health record systems.

The Comprehensive Facial Injury (CFI) Score Is an Early Predictor of the Management for Mild, Moderate and Severe Facial Trauma

Identifying groups of patients with homogeneous characteristics and comparable outcomes improves clinical activity, patients' management, and scientific research. This study aims to define mild, moderate, and severe facial trauma by validating two cut-off values of the Comprehensive Facial Injury (CFI) score and describing their foreseeable clinical needs to create a useful guide in patient management, starting from the first evaluation. The individual CFI score, overall surgical time, and length of hospitalization are calculated for a sample of 1400 facial-injured patients. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis and the corresponding Area Under the Curve (AUC) is tested, and a CFI score ≥4 is selected to discriminate patients undergoing surgical management under general anesthesia (Positive Predictive Value, PPV of 91.4%), while a CFI score ≥10 is selected to identify patients undergoing major surgical procedures (Negative Predictive Value, NPV of 91.7%). These results are enhanced by the consensual trend of Length of Stay outcome. The use of the CFI score allows us to distinguish between the "Mild facial trauma" with a low risk of hospitalization for surgical treatment, the "Moderate facial trauma" with a high probability of surgical treatment, and the "Severe facial trauma" that requires long-lasting surgery and hospital stay, with an increased incidence of Intensive Care Unit admission.

Pattern of oral and maxillofacial trauma and associated factors: An 8-year prospective study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Oral and maxillofacial trauma (OMFT) is a public health problem due to its high occurrence and demand for resources for its management and the financial and social impact of OMFT victims on the health system. The aim of this study was to conduct an 8-year prospective analysis of OMFT cases from an emergency service.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A hospital-based 8-year prospective study on OMFT and associated factors was performed on data from December 2011 to December 2019. Data regarding sociodemographic (gender, age, and skin color) and socio-economic profiles (educational level, family income, and occupation), OMFT profile (etiology, OMFT type, and treatment), associated factors [alcohol consumption and personal protective equipment (PPE) use], OMFT occurrence (injury day and hour), length of hospital stay, and cost were collected. Descriptive and inferential analyses of data were performed.

RESULTS

Most OMFT cases involved men with low schooling and family income, resulting from traffic accidents. OMFT severity was associated with longer hospital stay, higher hospital costs and nonuse of PPE, midface fractures (mainly orbital-zygomatic fractures), closed reduction, and open reduction/internal fixation. Traffic accidents were the main cause of longer hospital stays for victims aged 41-60 years with better socio-economic status compared with cases that had higher hospital costs. In general, higher hospital costs were associated with victims of violence under 40 years of age, with low schooling and farmers. Alcohol consumption and non-use of PPE also contributed to increasing the length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

Oral and maxillofacial trauma severity was associated with longer hospital stay and higher hospital costs. Associated factors such as alcohol consumption and non-use of PPE contributed to increase the length of hospital stay and OMFT severity.

Comprehensive facial injury (CFI) score as a predictor of surgical time, length of hospital stay, and head injury? Our experience at level I trauma center

Purpose:

The present study aimed to evaluate the statistical significance of comprehensive facial injury (CFI) score concerning total surgical time (ST), length of hospital stay (LHS), and head injury in maxillofacial trauma patients.

Methods:

This retrospective observational study included 288 patients having maxillofacial injuries with or without associated head injury. CFI score was calculated for each of them. One-way ANOVA and Kruskal–Wallis H-test were used to compare ST (minutes), LHS (days), and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score among the CFI score clusters. Head injury among the CFI score clusters was compared using Fisher's exact test. The level of statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results:

Of total 288 cases (males: 83.68%, females: 16.31%, mean age: 30 ± 15.92 years), road traffic accidents accounted for 76.0% of admissions. A definitive approach (open reduction and internal fixation) was used in 26.38% of cases. Statistically significant association of CFI score was obtained with ST and LHS in high-dependency unit (P < 0.001). Posttraumatic head injury was seen in 21.25% of cases. A significant association of CFI score with GCS score (P = 0.032) and with head injury (P = 0.019) was found.

Conclusion:

CFI score is a comprehensive yet simple scale to assess ST and LHS. A strong correlation established between CFI score and these variables further validate its reliability as a perfect tool for communication of the maxillofacial morbidity and in making a treatment protocol, although its predictive ability for associated head injuries needs to be studied further.

Correlation Between Sports-Related Maxillofacial Injuries and Head Injuries: A Five-Year Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

As sports have become more diverse and demanding, the number of patients with a maxillofacial injury accompanied by a cranial injury or neurological symptoms has increased. This study examined the correlation between sports-related maxillofacial injuries and head injuries.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Among the patients who visited the emergency department of Pusan National University Dental Hospital due to a maxillofacial injury from sporting activities between 2014 and 2018, those who additionally had head injuries were retrospectively examined. Sporting activities were classified according to the American Academy of Pediatrics classification, and severity of injuries was determined using the Facial Injury Severity Scale (FISS). Patients whose medical records showed neurological symptoms and who underwent brain computed tomography for concomitant head injury were selected. The association between each of these variables, including age and gender, was statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 95 patients were included in this study, most of whom were male teenagers, and cycling was the most common cause of injuries. The mean FISS score was 0.79. Brain computed tomography was conducted for 91 patients, and 28 patients reported neurological symptoms. Only 11 patients underwent advanced evaluation in the neurology or neurosurgery department. Most patients were diagnosed with contusion and concussion and were monitored without any treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher FISS values did not reflect the severity of maxillofacial and head injury. In this study, there were some patients with cranial fracture and cerebral hemorrhage with mild neurosurgical symptoms of facial trauma. Although the incidence of head trauma is not high, the necessity of wearing protective equipment cannot be overemphasized because severe trauma is permanent. Neurological signs and symptoms of patients with maxillofacial trauma should not be overlooked and require a thorough evaluation.

Classifying and standardizing panfacial trauma according to anatomic categories and Facial Injury Severity Scale: a 10-year retrospective study

Background

The purpose of this study was to identify the epidemiologic factors of panfacial fractures (PFs), and to evaluate the significance of anatomic PF categories and the Facial Injury Severity Scale (FISS) in classifying and standardizing panfacial injuries.

Methods

A retrospective review of all patients treated with PFs at our institution between June 2010 and April 2021 was performed. PF was defined as a concurrent fracture in at least 3 of 4 facial subunits (frontal, upper midface, lower midface, and mandible). Data regarding patient demographics, causes of injury, location of fractures, major concomitant injuries, and postinjury complications were collected, and the FISS score was collected from each patient. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 22.0.

Results

A total of 227 patients were enrolled. The most commonly fractured bones were the maxillary sinus wall (92.1%), mandible (82.8%), and zygomatic arch (75.3%), and the most common fracture sites in PFs were graphically presented. Four PF patterns were defined: FULM (n = 60), FUL (n = 39), ULM (n = 127), and FUM (n = 1). There was a significant association between PF patterns and sex (p = 0.018), the number of concomitant injuries (p = 0.014), and early surgical airway management (p = 0.003). Different PF patterns were significantly correlated with different types of concomitant injuries and complications. The FISS score showed a significant difference with PF patterns (p = 0.000) and sex (p = 0.007), and a FISS value of 11 or more is the appropriate cutoff for the prediction of multiple concomitant injuries and complications.

Conclusions

Both the anatomic PF categories and FISS were significantly correlated with various concomitant injuries and complications. The combination of PF categories and FISS provided a better positive and negative prediction of concomitant injuries and complications for PF patients. Patients with FULM and FISS > 11 had an obviously higher proportion of the need for multiprofessional treatment.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-021-01900-w.

Do Type of Helmet and Alcohol Use Increase Facial Trauma Severity?

PURPOSE

Facial trauma caused by motorcycle accidents has become a major issue because of its high prevalence and morbidity, causing death and esthetic and functional sequelae in many individuals. This work evaluated helmet and alcohol use and severity of facial fractures in motorcyclists treated at public hospitals in Pernambuco, Brazil.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective study was conducted from December 2016 to December 2018 and submitted to statistical and descriptive analysis. Variables such as gender, age, helmet use and type, previous accidents, and duration of hospitalization were collected. The Facial Injury Severity Scale was used to classify the facial fractures. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test was used to verify alcohol dependence.

RESULTS

The sample was composed of 455 patients. Most were male patients (90.8%) and were aged 18 to 29 years (54.5%). Of the patients, 36.5% reported no helmet use and 31.6% reported wearing an open helmet. Alcohol use was reported in 38.7% of the group. In 79.8% of the sample, alcohol use was classified as low risk. There was a greater likelihood of having severe facial trauma if patients were aged between 30 and 39 years and had harmful or at-risk alcohol use. These patients also tended to remain hospitalized for more than 10 days. No statistically significant relationship was found with the type of helmet.

CONCLUSIONS

The individuals most affected by facial trauma were young male patients (aged 18 to 29 years). Patients aged 30 to 39 years with high-risk use and dependence on alcohol were more likely to have more complex facial trauma. The type of helmet used was not effective in reducing the severity of facial fractures.

A Cross-sectional Study of the Association between Homelessness and Facial Fractures

Background:

Little is known about the risk factors for facial fractures among homeless patients. We investigated the association between homelessness, mechanism of injury, and type of facial fracture in patients treated at an urban trauma center.

Methods:

Data for 2,221 adults with facial fractures were obtained retrospectively from a standardized registry of trauma patients at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital from 2011 to 2016. Associations between homelessness and mechanism of injury, facial fracture type, and surgical repair type were evaluated with multivariate multinomial logistic regression analysis.

Results:

Among 2,221 patients with facial fractures, 12% were homeless and, compared with housed patients, more likely to be male, black, and test positive for drug and alcohol use (all P < 0.0001). They had lower injury severity scores but longer hospital stays and were more likely to be discharged to the community than to a rehabilitation facility (all P < 0.0001). After adjusting for confounding variables, homeless patients with facial fractures were nearly 3-fold more likely to have been assaulted than housed patients (OR = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.9–4.1, P < 0.0001) and twice as likely to have mandible fractures (OR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.3–3.0, P = 0.0030) and to have surgery for these fractures (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.2–3.7, P = 0.0110).

Conclusions:

Our novel results demonstrate that homeless patients with facial fractures are at much higher risk than the general population for being assaulted, suffering mandible fractures, and requiring surgery for these fractures. Further investigations could guide identification, treatment, and prevention efforts.

The use of teleradiology for triaging of maxillofacial trauma

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess and discuss our experience with a teleradiology technique applied to facial trauma patients referred to an oral and maxillofacial surgery hub center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All trauma patients with maxillofacial fractures from the hospitals of Vercelli, Biella, Borgosesia, Borgomanero, Verbania, and Domodossola who were referred between July 2014 and September 2018 to the hub maxillofacial center of Novara were reviewed. The following data were recorded for each patient: sex, age, referral hospital, etiology, etiology mechanisms, site of facial fractures, date of injury, indications for surgery according to teleradiology consultation, indications for surgery following clinical maxillofacial assessment, date of eventual surgery, timing of surgery from trauma, type of surgical intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 467 patients with a total of 605 fractures were triaged and managed by the Tempore telemedicine system. The most frequent cause of maxillofacial injury was fall. The most frequently observed fracture involved the zygoma. Following remote computed tomography assessment, surgical indications were suggested in 68 patients; 223 patients were not considered suitable candidates for surgery; and 176 patients needed a clinical assessment for the establishment of definitive eventual indications for surgery. Following clinical assessment, the absence and presence of surgical indications was confirmed in all 223 and 68 patients, respectively. Within the 176 patients with "possible" surgical indications, only 27 patients were referred for surgery.

CONCLUSION

Teleradiology may be helpful for an appropriate triaging of trauma patients from peripheral hospitals for the correct referral to a maxillofacial trauma hub center.

Understanding the relevance of comprehensive facial injury (CFI) score: Statistical analysis of overall surgical time and length of stay outcomes

Comprehensive facial injury (CFI) score is a powerful and extremely simple scale used to grade the clinical severity of all facial injuries, and is expressed in terms of the overall surgical time needed for definitive treatment. Its statistical validation was previously reported in 2019. The aim of this study was to investigate further the link with duration of surgery, applying the score to a larger sample of patients, and to evaluate the relationship between CFI score and other extremely relevant dependent variables: length of stay (LOS) in high care units (HCU) and in intensive care units (ICU). 1406 patients with diagnosis of at least one facial bone fracture, and treated by the same team in two highly specialized trauma centers, were studied. For each patient a specific CFI score is assigned and overall surgical time, length of stay, and presence of associated injuries were recorded. Data were divided into six clusters according to CFI score: (1) 0-5, (2) 6-10, (3) 11-15, (4) 16-20, (5) 21-25, and (6) >25. Regressions between CFI clusters and duration of surgery (minutes), LOS in ICU (days), and in HCU (days) were established. In addition, the presence of associated head and/or somatovisceral injuries was analyzed and related to CFI score. Statistical analysis confirmed linear regression existing between each CFI cluster and overall surgical time (p < 0.00001), with improved significance of the results using median values of surgical duration for each cluster (p = 0.0001). It also demonstrated the existence of linear regression between all CFI clusters and LOS in HCU (p = 0.0001) and between CFI clusters 3-6 and median values of LOS in ICU (p = 0.0001). Finally, associated injuries were observed to be more frequent in high CFI score clusters, occurring in around 90% of patients with a CFI score >25 (p < 0.00001). Association of head and facial injuries play a major role in high LOS in ICU values, whereas coexistence of facial, head and somatovisceral involvement increases LOS in ICU to over twice that for single association. Surgical time and length of stay are outcomes traditionally used to assess the statistical significance of many new proposed trauma score. The strong correlation demonstrated between CFI score and each of these variables confirms its value and reliability. CFI score is proven to be an ideal, simple, informative, and reproducible tool for measuring severity of facial injuries and their clinical impact. It allows correlation with associated head and somatovisceral injuries, focusing attention on the interesting field of reciprocal influences in simultaneous, multidistrectual involvement. None of the previously proposed facial injury severity scales have offered such informative and statistically significant features.