Risk Factors of Patients With and Without Postoperative Nausea (PON)

Factors associated with knowledge towards postoperative nausea and vomiting management among health professionals in referral Hospitals of Northwest Ethiopia. A multi-center cross-sectional study

Background

Knowledge of health care professionals on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and antiemetic prescription trends affects patient's outcome after surgery and anesthesia and also patient and family satisfaction. Hence, knowing the knowledge status of health professionals towards PONV management is vital for the optimal care of surgical patients. Therefore, the study aimed to assess the knowledge and factors associated with PONV management among health professionals in referral hospitals of Northwest Ethiopia.

Methods

An institutional based cross-sectional study was conducted on 407 health care professionals from March 1 to 30, 2019. A Simple random sampling technique was used to select the study participants. Both bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to identify factors associated with the knowledge level of health professionals on PONV management. In the multivariable analysis, variables with a p-value <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

In this study, about 52.8% (95% CI: 47.9, 57.2) of the participants had good knowledge of PONV management. Being male (AOR = 1.95; 95% CI: 1.20, 3.17), Physician (AOR = 5.36; 95% CI: 2.20, 13.5), Anesthetist (AOR = 3.88; 95% CI: 1.66, 9.08), and taking training on PONV management (AOR = 5.32; 95%CI: 1.58, 17.89) were positively associated with good knowledgeable of health professionals about PONV management.

Conclusion

and recommendation: More than half of health care professionals who are working in the perioperative sites of the referral hospitals had good knowledge about the PONV management. Being male, Physician, Anesthetist and taking in-service training on PONV management were significantly affecting the knowledge level of health professionals on PONV management. Thus, providing regular in-service training on PONV management, especially for physician and anesthetist is highly recommended.

Antiemetic Prophylaxis Practice and its Associated Factors Among Health Professionals in Referral Hospitals of North West Ethiopia: Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study

Background:

The practice of antiemetic prophylaxis within the prevention and management of postoperative nausea and vomiting is important for optimal care of surgical patients. The poor practice of antiemetic prophylaxis on postoperative nausea and vomiting prevention come up with complications, reduce patient satisfaction, and increase overall costs. This study aims to assess practice and associated factors of antiemetic prophylaxis among health professionals in referral hospitals of Northwest Ethiopia.

Method and materials:

Institutional based cross-sectional study was conducted on 407 health professionals from February 27 to March 30, 2019, in referral Hospitals of Northwest Ethiopia. A stratified random sampling technique was used to select the study participants. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the antiemetic prophylaxis practice level of health professionals on postoperative nausea and vomiting prevention and management. The p-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results:

In this study 153 (37.6%) of health professionals were practicing antiemetic prophylaxis. The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that anesthetists were (AOR: 8.11; 95% CI: 3.27, 20.08) and physicians (AOR: 4.78; 95% CI: 2.46, 9.30) were more likely to give anti-emetic prophylaxis as compared with midwives. Learning in academic classes (AOR: 3.83; 95% CI: 1.46, 10.09), took training (AOR: 6.97; 95% CI: 2.208, 22.021), professionals who said that there are enough anti-emetic drugs available (AOR: 3.10; 95% CI: 1.67, 5.77), professionals, who respond that patients can afford to buy antiemetic’s (AOR: 3.56; 95% CI: 1.23, 10.32) were more likely to give anti-emetic prophylaxis as compared to their counterparts.

Conclusions:

Less than fifty percent (37.6%) of health Professionals practice antiemetic prophylaxis. Type of Profession, learning, training, availability, and cost of antiemetic drugs were factors significantly affecting the practice of antiemetic prophylaxis.

Highlights:

A Quality Improvement Project to Determine the Effect of Aromatherapy on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in a Short-Stay Surgical Population

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a major concern for short-stay surgical patients because it can delay discharge and cause preventable postoperative complications, which in turn can increase hospital costs. Evidence suggests that aromatherapy effectively reduces PONV, either as a monotherapy or in conjunction with pharmacologic antiemetics. This quality improvement project investigated the effectiveness of aromatherapy in reducing PONV in a short-stay surgical population. The outcome of this project supported the hypothesis that the administration of blended aromatherapy would result in a significant decrease in patients' self-reported ratings of nausea. This finding suggests that aromatherapy is an appropriate adjunct therapy for decreasing patient nausea and vomiting in this short-stay surgical unit and may help prevent discharge delays in this population.

Factors Affecting Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Surgical Patients

PURPOSE

This study was to identify factors affecting postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and to investigate the incidence of PONV for the first 24 hours after operation.

DESIGN

The prospective research was performed in an 1,100-bed university hospital, from April to December, 2011. The sample consisted of 609 patients with elective surgery.

METHODS

Factors affecting PONV were identified by multiple logistic regression.

FINDINGS

Incidence of PONV was 27.1% for the first postoperative 24 hours. Insertion of nasogastric tube (OR, 4.54, P = .002), history of PONV (OR, 3.24, P < .001), general anesthesia (OR, 2.76, P = .002), history of motion sickness (OR, 2.33, P < .001), and female sex (OR, 2.05, P = .004) were high risk factors of PONV. The nonadministration of antiemetics during operation (OR, 1.70, P = .014) and nonuse of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (OR, 1.54, P = .038) increased PONV during the first postoperative 24 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients of female gender, history of motion sickness and PONV, general anesthesia, and nasogastric insertion are more likely to experience PONV.

Clinical utility of an undersized nurse-operated recovery room in the postoperative course: results from an Italian community setting

PURPOSE

In Europe, standardized criteria for recovery room (RR) requirements have not been established. The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical utility of an undersized nurse-operated RR in an Italian community hospital.

DESIGN

Single-center observational study.

METHODS

A total of 1,945 consecutive surgical patients admitted to the RR at the study institution between September 31, 2009, and August 31, 2011, were included in the study. A control group of surgical patients not admitted to the RR, matched for age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and type of surgery were also considered. The prevalence of early adverse events occurring within 3 hours of the end of surgery was compared between the two groups.

FINDINGS

Patients admitted to the RR (mean age, 73.6 ± 14.2 years; 42.2% male; and 76.3% having major surgery) showed lower prevalences of hypotension (P < .0001), hypertensive response (P < .0001), new arrhythmias requiring intervention (P = .0036), and oxygen desaturation (P < .0001) in comparison with the control group. No differences in the proportions of patients experiencing postoperative nausea and vomiting, shivering, bleeding, and respiratory events were found. The Numeric Rating Scale for pain was also significantly lower at 2 hours in the study group as compared to the control group (1 [0 to 5] vs 3 [1 to 7]; P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

In this Italian community setting, an undersized nurse-operated RR contributed to a reduced prevalence of adverse postoperative events.

[Reduction mammaplasty in ambulatory: A prospective study of feasibility]

OBJECTIVE

The French Ministry of Health and its regional agencies decided on December 27th, 2010 to develop the ambulatory surgery in the purpose to eliminate 48,000 beds of surgery in France. This evolution, which results from Anglo-Saxon countries, is inevitable in front of the financial deficit of our health insurance. Like the Canadian plastic surgeons, who were forced to it for 7 years, we wanted to study the feasibility of an ambulatory care of the reduction mammaplasties in a hospitalo-university department.

METHODS

Between January and June, 2012, 25 patients, of less than 65 years old, were operated for a reduction mammaplasty scheduled in ambulatory. None presented particular anesthetic risk. All lived unless 1h of the hospital, went out accompanied, were revised the day after the intervention, then in a usual way. Our criterias of evaluation were the following ones: global satisfaction of the care in ambulatory, weight of glandular resection, postoperative complications, rate of readmission.

RESULTS

The average age of the patients was 32 years (19-56 years). The average weight of resection was 400g by breast (140-1000g). Twenty patients went out on evening (80%). Among them, 19 (95%) expressed their satisfaction and would accept again this intervention in ambulatory. No major complication arose in this series. Five other patients saw their release repelled by the anaesthetists for the following motives: score of Aldrete lower than 9, pain not relieved by the analgesic (I or II), nausea and uncontrollable vomitings.

CONCLUSION

This first clinical study realized in France, confirms that when certain conditions are filled, the reduction mammaplasty can be realized in ambulatory with complete safety. The rate of satisfaction shows a very strong support of the patients for the ambulatory care.