Literature Review: Assessment of Opioid-related Sedation and the Pasero Opioid Sedation Scale

Construction of a nursing assessment framework for patients in anaesthesia recovery period: A modified Delphi study

AIM

To construct a nursing assessment framework for patients in anaesthesia recovery period.

DESIGN

A three-round modified Delphi method was employed to capture the consensus of 22 panellists.

METHODS

The initial items in the nursing assessment framework for patients in anaesthesia recovery period were developed based on the mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX). A panel of 22 experts participated in this study. The panellists have more than 10 years of experience in either clinical anaesthesia, or post-anesthesia nursing, or operating room nursing, or surgical intensive nursing. Between March and April 2023, the panellists evaluated and recommended revisions to the initial framework.

RESULTS

This study resulted in the development of a nursing assessment framework for patients in anaesthesia recovery period. The initial version of the framework consisted of six dimensions with 27 items. Six items were modified after the first round of consultation. After the second round, five modifications and four deletions were made based on expert opinion. The third round resulted in a convergence of expert opinion. The framework, which consists of 24 items across five dimensions, was refined. The five dimensions are as follows: History-taking, Physical assessment, Clinical judgement, Organizational efficiency and Humanistic concern.

CONCLUSION

The nursing assessment framework for patients in anaesthesia recovery period was reached consensus between the 22 experts' opinions.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE

The assessment framework constructed in this study could be used for the process evaluation of post-anesthesia nursing. The framework may guide perianesthesia nurses in the timely and effective assessment of patients during this critical phase of care. It may be used for perianesthesia nursing education or to evaluate nurses' assessment skills.

REPORTING METHOD

The study is reported in accordance with the Guidance on Conducting and Reporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) recommendations.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

Brazilian version of the Pasero Opioid-Induced Sedation Scale: cross-cultural adaptation study

OBJECTIVE

Perform a cross-cultural adaptation of the Pasero Opioid-induced Sedation Scale to the Brazilian setting.

METHOD

This is a methodological study using Beaton's framework, which consists in six stages: translation, synthesis of translations, re-translation, expert committee, pre-test, and sending the adapted version of the instrument to the author of the original. The study was carried out from April to December 2021. The research was conducted in a private hospitalin the city of São Paulo, in the adult hospitalization and critical care units. It was approved by the research ethics committee.

RESULTS

After translation, translation synthesis and back-translation steps, the version was evaluated by the expert committee, requiring two rounds to obtain acceptable CVI values above 0.80. In the pre-test phase, the scale was well understood, with a CVI of 0.98.

CONCLUSION

The scale was adapted for the Brazilian context; however, further studies will be needed to analyze validity and reliability evidence.

Nurses' Ability to Recognize and Prevent Opioid-Induced Respiratory Depression: An Evidenced-Based Practice Project

Opioids are the primary therapy for acute postoperative pain, despite being associated with opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD). The purpose of this study was to improve nurses' knowledge, confidence, and ability to recognize, prevent, and treat OIRD in postoperative inpatients and evaluate the feasibility of using the Pasero Opioid-Induced Sedation Scale (POSS). Registered nurses completed three tools: (1) an Opioid Knowledge Self-Assessment, which was administered pre- and post-education; (2) a Confidence Scale, which was administered pre- and post-education; and (3) a POSS Perceptions and Usability Scale that was administered post-education. Nurses were educated on the POSS and then immediately following the training practiced by undertaking a patient assessment using the instrument. They then completed the POSS Perceptions and Usability Scale to rate their perception of the feasibility of using the POSS. Between preeducation and posteducation, participant knowledge increased in the following areas: recognizing opioid-induced side effects, dose selection, risk factors for oversedation, and information to make clinical decisions. However, there was a drop in scores when asked about knowledge of who is at risk for opioid-related side effects. These findings support our conclusion that OIRD education improves nursing confidence and knowledge. There was significant agreement between the nurse and subject matter experts POSS scores, indicating that this tool is easy to use.

Perioperative Pain Management and Opioid Stewardship: A Practical Guide

Surgical procedures are key drivers of pain development and opioid utilization globally. Various organizations have generated guidance on postoperative pain management, enhanced recovery strategies, multimodal analgesic and anesthetic techniques, and postoperative opioid prescribing. Still, comprehensive integration of these recommendations into standard practice at the institutional level remains elusive, and persistent postoperative pain and opioid use pose significant societal burdens. The multitude of guidance publications, many different healthcare providers involved in executing them, evolution of surgical technique, and complexities of perioperative care transitions all represent challenges to process improvement. This review seeks to summarize and integrate key recommendations into a "roadmap" for institutional adoption of perioperative analgesic and opioid optimization strategies. We present a brief review of applicable statistics and definitions as impetus for prioritizing both analgesia and opioid exposure in surgical quality improvement. We then review recommended modalities at each phase of perioperative care. We showcase the value of interprofessional collaboration in implementing and sustaining perioperative performance measures related to pain management and analgesic exposure, including those from the patient perspective. Surgery centers across the globe should adopt an integrated, collaborative approach to the twin goals of optimal pain management and opioid stewardship across the care continuum.