1
|
Ofori S, Rayner D, Mikhail D, Borges FK, Marcucci MM, Conen D, Mbuagbaw L, Devereaux PJ. Barriers and facilitators to perioperative smoking cessation: A scoping review. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0298233. [PMID: 38861527 PMCID: PMC11166293 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Smoking cessation interventions are underutilized in the surgical setting. We aimed to systematically identify the barriers and facilitators to smoking cessation in the surgical setting. METHODS Following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) framework for scoping reviews, we searched 5 databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL, and PsycINFO) for quantitative or qualitative studies published in English (since 2000) evaluating barriers and facilitators to perioperative smoking cessation interventions. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis and mapped to the theoretical domains framework (TDF). RESULTS From 31 studies, we identified 23 unique barriers and 13 facilitators mapped to 11 of the 14 TDF domains. The barriers were within the domains of knowledge (e.g., inadequate knowledge of smoking cessation interventions) in 23 (74.2%) studies; environmental context and resources (e.g., lack of time to deliver smoking cessation interventions) in 19 (61.3%) studies; beliefs about capabilities (e.g., belief that patients are nervous about surgery/diagnosis) in 14 (45.2%) studies; and social/professional role and identity (e.g., surgeons do not believe it is their role to provide smoking cessation interventions) in 8 (25.8%) studies. Facilitators were mainly within the domains of environmental context and resources (e.g., provision of quit smoking advice as routine surgical care) in 15 (48.4%) studies, reinforcement (e.g., surgery itself as a motivator to kickstart quit attempts) in 8 (25.8%) studies, and skills (e.g., smoking cessation training and awareness of guidelines) in 5 (16.2%) studies. CONCLUSION The identified barriers and facilitators are actionable targets for future studies aimed at translating evidence informed smoking cessation interventions into practice in perioperative settings. More research is needed to evaluate how targeting these barriers and facilitators will impact smoking outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Ofori
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University Canada, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Daniel Rayner
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University Canada, Hamilton, Canada
| | - David Mikhail
- Department of Health Sciences, McMaster University Canada, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Flavia K. Borges
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University Canada, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Maura M. Marcucci
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University Canada, Hamilton, Canada
| | - David Conen
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University Canada, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Lawrence Mbuagbaw
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - P. J. Devereaux
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University Canada, Hamilton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mestdag M, Degey S, Deflandre E. [Perioperative smoking cessation (conventional smoking and e-cigarettes) in 2023. A narrative review of the literature]. Rev Mal Respir 2024; 41:237-247. [PMID: 38429192 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmr.2024.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Tobacco addiction is the leading cause of preventable death. During the perioperative period, patients who smoke are at increased risk of systemic as well as surgical site complications. STATE OF THE ART Surgery is an ideal time for change of lifestyle habits. It is vital to seize this opportunity to improve the patient's health in the long- as well as the short-term. Smoking cessation should be encouraged in all surgical patients. Initiating smoking cessation combines pharmacological treatment and a behavioral approach. In this field, significant advances have been recorded over the last decade. This review proposes a practical approach that every practitioner will be able to apply. PERSPECTIVES In this review, we will also examine ongoing research, particularly as regards vaccination and the place of biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS Smoking represents a major source of health-related complications. Smoking cessation must therefore remain a priority in the management of medical and surgical patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Mestdag
- Anesthésie-réanimation, université de Liège, Liège, Belgique
| | - S Degey
- Cabinet médical ASTES, Jambes, Belgique
| | - E Deflandre
- Anesthésie-réanimation, clinique Saint-Luc de Bouge, Namur, Belgique; Université de Liège, Liège, Belgique.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schaaf D. Smoking Cessation Counseling in the PreAnesthesia Testing Clinic: A Quality Improvement Initiative. J Perianesth Nurs 2022; 37:607-612. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2021.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/07/2021] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
4
|
Ugalde A, White V, Rankin NM, Paul C, Segan C, Aranda S, Wong Shee A, Hutchinson AM, Livingston PM. How can hospitals change practice to better implement smoking cessation interventions? A systematic review. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72:266-286. [PMID: 34797562 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Smoking cessation reduces the risk of death, improves recovery, and reduces the risk of hospital readmission. Evidence and policy support hospital admission as an ideal time to deliver smoking-cessation interventions. However, this is not well implemented in practice. In this systematic review, the authors summarize the literature on smoking-cessation implementation strategies and evaluate their success to guide the implementation of best-practice smoking interventions into hospital settings. The CINAHL Complete, Embase, MEDLINE Complete, and PsycInfo databases were searched using terms associated with the following topics: smoking cessation, hospitals, and implementation. In total, 14,287 original records were identified and screened, resulting in 63 eligible articles from 56 studies. Data were extracted on the study characteristics, implementation strategies, and implementation outcomes. Implementation outcomes were guided by Proctor and colleagues' framework and included acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, cost, feasibility, fidelity, penetration, and sustainability. The findings demonstrate that studies predominantly focused on the training of staff to achieve implementation. Brief implementation approaches using a small number of implementation strategies were less successful and poorly sustained compared with well resourced and multicomponent approaches. Although brief implementation approaches may be viewed as advantageous because they are less resource-intensive, their capacity to change practice in a sustained way lacks evidence. Attempts to change clinician behavior or introduce new models of care are challenging in a short time frame, and implementation efforts should be designed for long-term success. There is a need to embrace strategic, well planned implementation approaches to embed smoking-cessation interventions into hospitals and to reap and sustain the benefits for people who smoke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Ugalde
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Center for Quality and Patient Safety Research and Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Victoria White
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nicole M Rankin
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Christine Paul
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Catherine Segan
- Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Center for Health Policy, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sanchia Aranda
- Department of Nursing, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anna Wong Shee
- Ballarat Health Services, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alison M Hutchinson
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Center for Quality and Patient Safety Research and Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
- Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Patricia M Livingston
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Center for Quality and Patient Safety Research and Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|