Verification of the sensitivity of functional scores for treatment results - Substantial clinical benefit thresholds for the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ)

Calculation of the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) using different methodologies: case study and practical guide

INTRODUCTION

Establishing thresholds of change that are actually meaningful for the patient in an outcome measurement instrument is paramount. This concept is called the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). We summarize available MCID calculation methods relevant to spine surgery, and outline key considerations, followed by a step-by-step working example of how MCID can be calculated, using publicly available data, to enable the readers to follow the calculations themselves.

METHODS

Thirteen MCID calculations methods were summarized, including anchor-based methods, distribution-based methods, Reliable Change Index, 30% Reduction from Baseline, Social Comparison Approach and the Delphi method. All methods, except the latter two, were used to calculate MCID for improvement of Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) Symptom Severity of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Numeric Rating Scale for Leg Pain and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire Walking Ability domain were used as anchors.

RESULTS

The MCID for improvement of ZCQ Symptom Severity ranged from 0.8 to 5.1. On average, distribution-based methods yielded lower MCID values, than anchor-based methods. The percentage of patients who achieved the calculated MCID threshold ranged from 9.5% to 61.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

MCID calculations are encouraged in spinal research to evaluate treatment success. Anchor-based methods, relying on scales assessing patient preferences, continue to be the "gold-standard" with receiver operating characteristic curve approach being optimal. In their absence, the minimum detectable change approach is acceptable. The provided explanation and step-by-step example of MCID calculations with statistical code and publicly available data can act as guidance in planning future MCID calculation studies.

Comprehensive Assessment of Indirect Decompression Through Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire-Based Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the clinical outcomes of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) as an indirect decompression technique for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) and concomitant degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) patients. We utilized the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) to assess treatment success and its impact on patient's quality of life (QOL).

METHODS

We included 124 patients who underwent LLIF. Pre- and postoperative JOABPEQ evaluations indicated treatment success. Subgroup analysis categorized patients' perceptions of surgery as beneficial or non-beneficial.

RESULTS

89% of patients (110/124) reported satisfaction with LLIF. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion achieved successful indirect decompression, increasing canal diameter and central canal area. Significant improvements occurred across all JOABPEQ domains, notably for low back pain, lumbar function, walking ability, social life function, and mental health. Patients who perceived the surgery as beneficial experienced fewer postoperative complications, lower numeric rating scale scores for pain relief, and greater functional outcome improvements compared to non-beneficial patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight the utility of JOABPEQ as a valuable and sensitive tool for assessing treatment effectiveness and patient-reported outcomes in DS and concomitant DLSS patients. Patients undergoing LLIF. The results affirm the favorable outcomes of LLIF as a surgical option for DLSS patients and emphasize the importance of considering patient perspectives when evaluating overall treatment success. The study provides valuable insights into the impact of indirect decompression on patients' QOL, supporting the effectiveness of LLIF as a minimally invasive technique for DLSS and DS management.

Cross-cultural adaptation of The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire: A methodological systematic review

BACKGROUND

The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) is a reliable and sensitive measure of disability to determine functional status and evaluate curative effects in low back pain, it has now been cross-cultural translated into many other languages and adapted for use in different countries. We aim to evaluate the translation procedures and measurement properties of cross-cultural adaptations of the JOABPEQ.

METHODS

Studies related to cross-cultural adaptation of the JOABPEQ in a specific language/culture were searched in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, SciELO, PsycINFO, SinoMed, and Web of Science from their inception to March 2022. The Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures and the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Status Measurement Instruments guideline were used for evaluation.

RESULTS

Nine different versions of cross-cultural JOABPEQ adaptations in 8 different languages/cultures were included. The adaptation process was not strictly performed, such as standard forward translation and expert committee review were rarely reported. Content validity (8/9), floor and ceiling effects (3/9), reliability (4/9), and interpretability (6/9) were assessed in most of the adaptations, while agreement (2/9), responsiveness (2/9), and the internal consistency (2/9) were not. JOABPEQ can replace functional and quality of life score to reduce the burden of scientific research.

CONCLUSION

We recommend Persian-Iranian, simplified Chinese-Chinese Mandarin, Thai and Gunaydin G's Turkish adaptations for application. The numerical pain rating scale/visual analogue scale in low back pain and lower extremities, as well as numbness in lower extremities could not be neglected in JOABPEQ adaptations.

Protocol for treating lumbar spinal canal stenosis with a combination of ultrapurified, allogenic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and in situ-forming gel: a multicentre, prospective, double-blind randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

In patients with combined lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS), a herniated intervertebral disc (IVD) that compresses the dura mater and nerve roots is surgically treated with discectomy after laminoplasty. However, defects in the IVD after discectomy may lead to inadequate tissue healing and predispose patients to the development of IVD degeneration. Ultrapurified stem cells (rapidly expanding clones (RECs)), combined with an in situ-forming bioresorbable gel (dMD-001), have been developed to fill IVD defects and prevent IVD degeneration after discectomy. We aim to investigate the safety and efficacy of a new treatment method in which a combination of REC and dMD-001 is implanted into the IVD of patients with combined LSCS.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a multicentre, prospective, double-blind randomised controlled trial. Forty-five participants aged 20-75 years diagnosed with combined LSCS will be assessed for eligibility. After performing laminoplasty and discectomy, participants will be randomised 1:1:1 into the combination of REC and dMD-001 (REC-dMD-001) group, the dMD-001 group or the laminoplasty and discectomy alone (control) group. The primary outcomes of the trial will be the safety and effectiveness of the procedure. The effectiveness will be assessed using visual analogue scale scores of back pain and leg pain as well as MRI-based estimations of morphological and compositional quality of the IVD tissue. Secondary outcomes will include self-assessed clinical scores and other MRI-based estimations of compositional quality of the IVD tissue. All evaluations will be performed at baseline and at 1, 4, 12, 24 and 48 weeks after surgery.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the ethics committees of the institutions involved. We plan to conduct dissemination of the outcome data by presenting our data at national and international conferences, as well as through formal publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

jRCT2013210076.

Neurophysiologic evaluation of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Background

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a neurodegenerative disease caused by repetitive spinal cord damage that has resulted in significant clinical morbidity. The clinical evaluation of signs and symptoms, as well as neuroimaging and several neurophysiological tests, are used to make the diagnosis.

Objectives

To investigate changes in the cutaneous silent period (CuSP), cortical silent period (CoSP), and H-reflex in CSM patients, and to correlate these tests with the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and Nurick’s grading, as well as to determine the diagnostic value of each of them.

Methods

Twenty patients (14 males and 6 females) with CSM were clinically diagnosed and documented by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and they were paired with another 20 healthy volunteers (13 males and 7 females) as a control group. CuSP, CoSP, and H-reflex tests were performed on both groups.

Results

In CSM patients, CuSP latency and duration are substantially longer and shorter in CSM patients, respectively. The degree of changes in CuSP latency is well correlated with the severity of the disease. Further, CoSP duration is significantly shortened. The H-reflex parameters did not differ significantly between the patient and control groups.

Conclusion

The shortened CoSP’s duration and the prolonged CuSP's latency suggest malfunction of the inhibitory and excitatory circuits in the spinal cord. The CuSP is more sensitive and specific than the CoSP in the diagnosis of a patient with CSM.

Characteristics of patients who dropped out after multidisciplinary pain management in Japan: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Because regular visits to distant hospitals may be a burden to patients, both in terms of time and cost, some patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain may discontinue multidisciplinary pain treatment, unable to maintain motivation to attend.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the pre-program characteristics of patients who dropped out and patients who continued treatment, thereby clarifying the characteristics of patients at risk of dropping out.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary pain management treatment program was implemented for patients at the Pain Management Center, Hoshi General Hospital. From April 2015 to March 2018, 23 patients participated in the program. Twelve of the 23 patients lived outside the prefecture where the hospital is located. Of these 12 patients, five completed the program, while seven did not. We compared the dropout and continuation groups in terms of patient characteristics, pain severity, pain-related psychosocial factors, and quality of life.

RESULTS

We found significant differences (p< 0.05) in median age, Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire walking ability dysfunction score, and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire score.

CONCLUSIONS

The characteristics of patients who dropped out were older age, walking ability dysfunction, and low quality of life associated with low back pain.

Supervised physical therapy versus surgery for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a propensity score-matched analysis

Background

Previous studies comparing surgical with nonsurgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) reported that surgery is superior to nonsurgical treatments, but intensive and adequate volume of physical therapy were rarely performed. The purpose of this study was to compare the 1-year follow-up outcomes of patients with LSS treated with supervised physical therapy or surgery using propensity score-matched analysis.

Methods

A total of 224 patients with LSS who received supervised physical therapy (n = 38) or surgery (n = 186) were included, of which 66 were matched on baseline demographics, radiological findings, and patient-reported outcomes. The physical therapy group received supervised physical therapy twice weekly for 6 weeks. The physical therapy sessions included manual therapy, individually tailored exercises, cycling, and body-weight supported treadmill walking. The surgery group underwent decompression surgery with or without spinal fusion. A propensity score analysis was performed using a one-to-one nearest neighbor approach.

Results

The surgery group showed greater improvements in Zurich claudication questionnaire symptom severity and physical function, SF-36 physical functioning, bodily pain, and mental health, but had more severe stenosis and symptoms and mental health problems than the physical therapy group at baseline (P <  0.05). After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, and all clinical outcomes at 1 year, except for a higher percentage of responders achieving minimum clinically important difference in the role-emotional subscale of SF-36 in the surgery group (P <  0.05).

Conclusions

When baseline characteristics were considered, supervised physical therapy yielded similar effects to lumbar surgery. These results suggest that supervised physical therapy is preferred over surgery as first-choice treatment, to prevent complications and to minimize health care costs, especially in mild to moderate cases of LSS.

Exploratory clinical trial on the safety and capability of dMD-001 in lumbar disc herniation: Study protocol for a first-in-human pilot study

Herniated nucleus pulposus (NP), one of the most common diseases of the spine, is surgically treated by removing the sequestered NP. However, intervertebral disc (IVD) defects may remain after discectomy, leading to inadequate tissue healing and predisposing patients to IVD degeneration. An acellular, bioresorbable, ultra-purified alginate (UPAL) gel (dMD-001) implantation system can be used to fill any IVD defects in order to prevent IVD degeneration after discectomy. This first-in-human pilot study aims to determine the feasibility, safety, and perceived patient response to a combined treatment involving discectomy and UPAL gel implantation for herniated NP. We designed a one-arm, double-centre, open-label, pilot trial. The study started in November 2018 and will run until a sample of 40 suitable participants is established. Patients aged 20-49 years, diagnosed with isolated lumbar IVD herniation and scheduled for discectomy represent suitable candidates. All eligible participants who provide informed consent undergo standard discectomy followed by UPAL gel implantation. The primary outcomes of the trial will be the feasibility and safety of the procedure. Secondary outcomes will include self-assessed clinical scores and magnetic resonance imaging-based measures of morphological and compositional quality of the IVD tissue. Initial outcomes will be published at 24 weeks. Analysis of feasibility and safety will be performed using descriptive statistics. Both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses of treatment trends of effectiveness will be conducted.

Predictors for quality of life improvement after surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a prospective multi-center study

BACKGROUND

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) can significantly impair a patient's quality of life (QOL). In this study, we aimed to identify predictors associated with QOL improvement after surgery for DCM.

METHODS

This study included 148 patients who underwent surgery for DCM. The European QOL-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) score, the Japanese Orthopedic Association for the assessment of cervical myelopathy (C-JOA) score, and the Nurick grade were used as outcome measures. Radiographic examinations were performed at enrollment. The associations of baseline variables with changes in EQ-5D scores from preoperative to 1-year postoperative assessment were investigated using a multivariable linear regression model.

RESULTS

The EQ-5D and C-JOA scores and the Nurick grade improved after surgery (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). Univariable analysis revealed that preoperative EQ-5D and C-JOA scores were significantly associated with increased EQ-5D scores from preoperative assessment to 1 year after surgery (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.045). Multivariable regression analysis showed that the independent preoperative predictors of change in QOL were lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), and T1 pelvic angle (TPA). According to the prediction model, the increased EQ-5D score from preoperatively to 1 year after surgery = 0.308 - 0.493 × EQ-5D + 0.006 × LL - 0.008 × SS + 0.004 × TPA.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative LL, SS, and TPA significantly impacted the QOL of patients who underwent surgery for DCM. Less improvement in QOL after surgery was achieved in patients with smaller LL and TPA and larger SS values. Patients with these risk factors may therefore require additional support to experience adequate improvement in QOL.

Supervised physical therapy versus unsupervised exercise for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: 1-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the 1-year outcomes of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated with supervised physical therapy or unsupervised exercise.

DESIGN

A single-center randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessor and intention-to-treat analysis.

SETTING

Spine care center.

SUBJECTS

A total of 86 patients presenting with symptoms of neurogenic claudication caused by lumbar spinal stenosis.

INTERVENTIONS

The physical therapy group received supervised physical therapy sessions twice a week for 6 weeks and home exercise program. The home exercise group received 6-week home exercise program only.

MAIN MEASURES

The primary outcome was symptom severity on the Zurich claudication questionnaire at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included physical function, pain, health-related quality of life and the surgery rate after 1 year.

RESULTS

At 1 year, more patients in the physical therapy group than in the home exercise group achieved minimum clinically important differences in Zurich claudication questionnaire symptom severity (60.5% vs 32.6%; adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 4.3, [95% CI [1.5-12.3], P = 0.01); Zurich claudication questionnaire physical function (55.8% vs 32.6%; AOR 3.0 [1.1-8.1], P = 0.03); SF-36 bodily pain (48.8% vs 25.6%; AOR 2.8 [1.1-7.3], P = 0.03), and SF-36 general health (20.9% vs 7.0%; AOR 6.1 [1.1-33.0], P = 0.04). The surgery rate at 1 year was lower in the physical therapy than in the home exercise group (7.0% vs 23.3%; AOR 0.2 [0.04-0.9] P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Supervised physical therapy produced greater improvements in symptom severity and physical function than unsupervised exercise and was associated with lower likelihood of receiving surgery within 1 year.

Long-Term Outcomes Following Lumbar Microendoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with and without Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether preoperative presence of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DS) worsens the minimum 10-year outcome of patients undergoing microendoscopic decompression (MED) for lumbar spinal stenosis (SS).

METHODS

Eighty patients undergoing MED were classified into 2 groups: DS group (34 SS with DS patients) and SS group (46 SS without DS patients). The degrees of improvement (DOIs) by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) and intensities of improvement (IOIs) by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 120-159 (mean, 138.4) months after MED of the DS and SS groups were statistically compared. Patients with DS were classified into 2 groups based on the effectiveness by VAS or JOABPEQ: effective group (E group: IOI or DOI ≥20) and ineffective group (I group). All preoperative radiologic measurements were statistically compared between the E and I groups.

RESULTS

Significant decreases in low back pain, leg pain, and numbness, as measured by VAS, were noted at follow-up in the DS and SS groups. The effectiveness rates of pain-related disorders, lumbar spine dysfunction, and gait disturbance by JOABPEQ were almost equally high in the DS and SS groups. Statistical comparisons of the DOIs in all 5 functional scores and IOIs in low back pain, leg pain, and numbness showed no significant differences between the DS and SS groups. No significant differences were confirmed between the E and I groups concerning preoperative spondylolisthesis and instability.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicated that preoperative DS did not worsen the outcome of patients with SS undergoing MED.

Association between low back pain and quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis according to patient-reported outcomes using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ): A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate factors associated with low back pain (LBP) and effect on quality of life (QOL) using patient-reported outcome in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Overall, 414 patients with RA who answered the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) were included in this study. LBP-positive was defined a visual analog scale (VAS) of LBP (LBP VAS) of ≥ 30 mm.

RESULTS

The rate of LBP-positive group was 24.9%. Body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR]: 1.116), tender joint count (TJC) (OR: 1.598), global VAS (OR: 1.016), and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (OR: 2.392) were found as significant LBP-associated factors. When adjusted for sex and van der Heijde-modified total Sharp score, BMI (OR: 1.120), TJC (OR: 1.619), global VAS (OR: 1.016), pain VAS (OR: 1.015), and HAQ-DI (OR: 2.312) were found to be the significant factors associated with LBP. Moreover, LBP VAS had relatively high correlations in all domains of the JOABPEQ scores (correlation coefficient: LBP, -0.601; lumbar function, -0.624; walking ability, -0.548; social life function, -0.479; and mental health, -0.463).

CONCLUSIONS

This study investigated the effect of LBP in patients with RA. The results of this study indicate that LBP is associated with the physical function and QOL in patients with RA. We believe that our results will be useful for physical function and QOL assessments in patients with RA with LBP.

Therapeutic Advantages of Frequent Physical Therapy Sessions for Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study of a randomized clinical trial and a prospective study of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify the effects of the number of physical therapy (PT) sessions on clinical outcomes of patients with LSS.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Supervised PT for patients with LSS has been reported to lead to better short-term outcomes in terms of disability and leg pain than unsupervised exercise. However, no studies have investigated the relationship between the number of PT sessions and the therapeutic effects in patients with LSS.

METHODS

All patients received exercise therapy for 6 weeks. Included were 43 patients receiving supervised PT twice a week (P2 group), 38 patients receiving supervised PT once a week (P1 group), and 43 patients receiving a home exercise program alone (HE group). Clinical outcomes were measured using the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), a numerical rating scale (NRS) of back pain and leg pain, the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) at baseline and at 6 weeks.

RESULTS

At 6 weeks, the P2 group showed significant improvements in ZCQ physical function, back and leg pain on the NRS compared with the P1 group (P < 0.05). Compared with the HE group, the P2 group showed significant improvements in ZCQ symptom severity and physical function, back and leg pain on the NRS, and JOABPEQ gait disturbance (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in mean changes after 6 weeks between the P1 and HE groups.

CONCLUSION

Six weeks of supervised PT twice a week resulted in significant short-term improvements in symptom severity, physical function, back and leg pain, and gait disturbance compared with once a week and/or home exercise alone. Patients with LSS should be treated with intensive and supervised exercise programs to obtain maximum benefit of exercise therapy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Influence of Sarcopenia on the Effect of Exercise Therapy for Elderly Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain

Introduction

Sarcopenia, a condition characterized by decreased skeletal muscle mass, has increasingly been attracting attention in Japan, which has an aged society. The association between chronic low back pain (CLBP) and muscle mass is important. This study aimed to investigate the effect of exercise therapy for CLBP with or without sarcopenia.

Methods

This study was a prospective cohort study. Patients who were aged >65 years during 2017-2018 and had CLBP, with pain lasting >12 weeks and pain intensity being ≥3, were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups: sarcopenia (S) and nonsarcopenia (NS) groups. The numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain intensity, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), trunk muscle strength, a European Quality of Life instrument, and an NRS of treatment satisfaction were assessed. All patients underwent a high-intensity exercise therapy during 2 weeks of hospitalization and were followed up for 1 and 3 months.

Results

Twenty-eight patients with CLBP were included. The prevalence rate of sarcopenia was 42.9%. The NRS and RMDQ scores and gait function were clinically improved at the end points in all patients with or without sarcopenia. Moreover, high treatment satisfaction was achieved. The quality of life, treatment satisfaction, psychological disorder subscale score of the JOABPEQ, and HADS score tended to be lower in the S group than in the NS group.

Conclusions

Our short-term exercise therapy was effective for low back pain, disability, and gait disturbance in elderly patients with CLBP with or without sarcopenia. However, the prevalence of sarcopenia was high in elderly patients with CLBP. Although low back pain and disability in patients in the S group were improved by exercise therapy, their quality of life and treatment satisfaction might be lower than those of patients without sarcopenia.

Responsiveness of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire in lumbar surgery and its threshold for indicating clinically important differences

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Introduced in 2007, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) has been widely used, but its psychometric properties have not been well studied.

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to assess the responsiveness of the JOABPEQ in lumbar surgery and its threshold for indicating clinically important differences.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a prospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Two hundred three consecutive patients underwent lumbar surgeries between July 2013 and November 2015 in a single hospital. Of the 203 patients, 181 patients who completed 1 year of follow-up were included.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Before and after surgery, the patients were asked to complete the questionnaire, including JOABPEQ, the 8-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-8), and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). The participants were divided into five anchoring groups, ranging from "much better" to "much worse," according to reports from both physicians and patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The responsiveness of measures was compared among five domains of the JOABPEQ ("low back pain," "walking ability," "lumbar function," "social function," and "mental health"), two domains of the SF-8 (the physical component summary [PCS] and the mental component summary [MCS]), and the EQ-5D. The responsiveness was assessed by the paired t test, the effect size, and the standardized response mean. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were assessed using the five anchoring groups as external criteria. The clinically important differences, based on the ROC curve, were assessed.

RESULTS

Walking ability was most responsive, followed by low back pain and the PCS. The MCS was least responsive, followed by mental health and lumbar function. Social function and the EQ-5D had intermediate-level responsiveness. The substantial clinically important differences occurred at 20 points for low back pain and lumbar function, 23 points for walking ability, 14 points for social function, and 8 points for mental health.

CONCLUSIONS

The JOABPEQ domains are responsive measures in patients who undergo lumbar surgery. For physical function, the threshold for substantial clinically important differences was approximately 20 points for the JOABPEQ.

Establishment of reference scores and interquartile ranges for the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) in patients with low back pain

BACKGROUND

The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) was developed in 2007, including the five domains of Pain-related disorder, Lumbar spine dysfunction, Gait disturbance, Social life disturbance, and Psychological disorder. It is used by physicians to evaluate treatment efficacy by comparing scores before and after treatment. However, the JOABPEQ does not allow evaluation of the severity of a patient's condition compared to the general population at a single time point. Given the unavailability of a standard measurement of back pain, we sought to establish reference scores and interquartile ranges using data obtained from a multicenter, cross-sectional survey taken in Japanese primary care settings.

METHODS

The Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Diagnosis Support Tool project was conducted from 2011 to 2012 in 1657 hospitals in Japan to investigate the establishment of reference scores using JOABPEQ. Patients aged ≥ 20 years undergoing medical examinations by either non-orthopaedic primary care physicians or general orthopedists were considered for enrollment.

RESULTS

A total of 10,651 consecutive low back pain patients (5331 men, 5320 women, 18 subjects with missing sex data) who had undergone a medical examination were included. Reference scores and interquartile ranges for each of the five domains of the JOABPEQ according to age and sex were recorded. The median score and interquartile range are the same in the domain of Pain-related disorder in all ages and sexes. The reference scores for Gait disturbance, Social life disturbance and Psychological disorder declined with increasing age in both age- and sex-stratified groups, while there was some different trend in Lumbar spine dysfunction between men and women.

CONCLUSION

Reference scores and interquartile ranges for JOABPEQ were generated based on the data from the examination data. These provide a measurement standard to assess patient perceptions of low back pain at any time point during evaluation or therapy.

Revision Surgery for Short Segment Fusion Influences Postoperative Low Back Pain and Lower Extremity Pain: A Retrospective Single-Center Study of Patient-Based Evaluation

Introduction

Patients treated with revision surgery after lumbar decompression with fusion typically have persistent low back pain and lower extremity numbness compared with patients treated with only primary surgery. No well-designed study has investigated the persistence and degree of pain after revision surgery following instrumented operation. The purpose of this study is to compare residual pain among patients who underwent reoperation and those who underwent only primary surgery for lumbar degenerative disorder using patient-based evaluation.

Methods

We reviewed 350 consecutive patients (143 men, 207 women, mean age 63 years) treated with primary lumbar instrumented surgery between October 2010 and February 2014 at our institution and followed up for ≥2 years postoperatively. Patients were categorized into three groups based on number of levels fused: 1-segment, 2-segment, and ≥3-segment fusion (1F, 2F, and ≥3F groups, respectively). We used the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) and visual analog scales (VASs) for low back pain and lower extremity pain to evaluate pain intensity pre- and postoperatively.

Results

Salvage surgery for late-phase complications was required in 5 cases (2.4%), 6 cases (11.3%), and 11 cases (12.1%) in the 1F, 2F, and ≥3F groups, respectively. In the 1F and 2F groups, patients treated with revision surgery had unsatisfactory improvement in the pain domain of JOABPEQ and VASs for low back pain and lower extremity pain compared with patients with only primary short fusion surgery. The ≥3F group showed no significant differences between patients who underwent reoperation and those who underwent only primary surgery.

Conclusion

Low back pain and lower extremity pain often persist after revision surgery in patients treated with short fusion (≤2-segment) operation. We need to follow pain states in such patients.