Iodine-supported titanium implants have good antimicrobial attachment effects

Antibacterial Coatings for Titanium Implants: Recent Trends and Future Perspectives

Titanium and its alloys are widely used as implant materials for biomedical devices owing to their high mechanical strength, biocompatibility, and corrosion resistance. However, there is a significant rise in implant-associated infections (IAIs) leading to revision surgeries, which are more complicated than the original replacement surgery. To reduce the risk of infections, numerous antibacterial agents, e.g., bioactive compounds, metal ions, nanoparticles, antimicrobial peptides, polymers, etc., have been incorporated on the surface of the titanium implant. Various coating methods and surface modification techniques, e.g., micro-arc oxidation (MAO), layer-by-layer (LbL) assembly, plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO), anodization, magnetron sputtering, and spin coating, are exploited in the race to create a biocompatible, antibacterial titanium implant surface that can simultaneously promote tissue integration around the implant. The nature and surface morphology of implant coatings play an important role in bacterial inhibition and drug delivery. Surface modification of titanium implants with nanostructured materials, such as titanium nanotubes, enhances bone regeneration. Antimicrobial peptides loaded with antibiotics help to achieve sustained drug release and reduce the risk of antibiotic resistance. Additive manufacturing of patient-specific porous titanium implants will have a clear future direction in the development of antimicrobial titanium implants. In this review, a brief overview of the different types of coatings that are used to prevent implant-associated infections and the applications of 3D printing in the development of antibacterial titanium implants is presented.

Drug Delivery from PCL/Chitosan Multilayer Coatings for Metallic Implants

Implant-related infections, mainly caused by Staphylococcus aureus, are a major health concern. Treatment is challenging due to multi-resistant strains and the ability of S. aureus to adhere and form biofilms on bone and implant surfaces. The present work involved the preparation and evaluation of a novel dual polymeric film coating on stainless steel. Chitosan and polycaprolactone (PCL) multilayers, loaded with poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) microspheres encapsulating vancomycin or daptomycin, produced by the dip-coating technique, allowed local antibiotic-controlled delivery for the treatment of implant-related infections. Enhanced adhesion of the film to the metal substrate surface was achieved by mechanical abrasion of its surface. Studies have shown that for both drugs the release occurs by diffusion, but the release profile depends on the type of drug (daptomycin or vancomycin), the pH of the solution, and whether the drug is freestanding (directly incorporated into the films) or encapsulated in PMMA microspheres. Daptomycin freestanding films reached 90% release after 1 day at pH 7.4 and 4 days at pH 5.5. In comparison, films with daptomycin encapsulated microspheres reached 90% release after 2 h at pH 5.5 and 2 days at pH 7.4. Vancomycin encapsulated and freestanding films showed a similar behavior reaching 90% release after 20 h of release at pH 5.5 and 2 and 3 days, respectively, at pH 7.4. Furthermore, daptomycin-loaded films showed activity (assessed by agar diffusion assays) against sensitive (ATCC 25923) and clinically isolated (MRSA) S. aureus strains.

Antibacterial Activity in Iodine-coated Implants Under Conditions of Iodine Loss: Study in a Rat Model Plus In Vitro Analysis

BACKGROUND

We developed iodine-coated titanium implants to suppress microbial activity and prevent periprosthetic joint infection (PJI); their efficacy was demonstrated in animal and in vitro models. The iodine content in iodine-coated implants naturally decreases in vivo. However, to our knowledge, the effect of reduced iodine content on the implant's antimicrobial activity has not been evaluated to date.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) How much does the iodine content on the implant surface decrease after 4 and 8 weeks in vivo in a rat model? (2) What effect does the reduced iodine content have on the antimicrobial effect of the implant against multiple bacteria in an in vitro model?

METHODS

This experiment was performed in two parts: an in vivo experiment to determine attenuation of iodine levels over time in rats, and an in vitro experiment in which we sought to assess whether the reduced iodine content observed in the in vivo experiment was still sufficient to deliver antimicrobial activity against common pathogens seen in PJI. For the in vivo experiment, three types of titanium alloy washers were implanted in rats: untreated (Ti), surface-anodized to produce an oxide film (Ti-O), and with an iodine layer on the oxidation film (Ti-I). The attenuation of iodine levels in rats was measured over time using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Herein, only the Ti-I washer was used, with five implanted in each rat that were removed after 4 or 8 weeks. For the 4- and 8-week models, two rats and 15 washers were used. For the in vitro study, to determine the antibacterial effect, three types of washers (Ti, Ti-O, and Ti-I) (nine washers in total) were implanted in each rat. Then, the washers were removed and the antibacterial effect of each washer was examined on multiple bacterial species using the spread plate method and fluorescence microscopy. For the spread plate method, six rats were used, and five rats were used for the observation using fluorescence microscopy; further, 4- and 8-week models were made for each method. Thus, a total of 22 rats and 198 washers were used. Live and dead bacteria in the biofilm were stained, and the biofilm coverage percentage for quantitative analysis was determined using fluorescence microscopy in a nonblinded manner. Ti-I was used as the experimental group, and Ti and Ti-O were used as control groups. The total number of rats and washers used throughout this study was 24 and 213, respectively.

RESULTS

Iodine content in rats implanted with Ti-I samples decreased to 72% and 65% after the in vivo period of 4 and 8 weeks, respectively (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). In the in vitro experiment, the Ti-I implants demonstrated a stronger antimicrobial activity than Ti and Ti-O implants in the 4- and 8-week models. Both the median number of bacterial colonies and the median biofilm coverage percentage with live bacteria on Ti-I were lower than those on Ti or Ti-O implants for each bacterial species in the 4- and 8-week models. There was no difference in the median biofilm coverage percentage of dead bacteria. In the 8-week model, the antibacterial activity using the spread plate method had median (interquartile range) numbers of bacteria on the Ti, Ti-O, and Ti-I implants of 112 (104 to 165) × 105, 147 (111 to 162) × 105, and 55 (37 to 67) × 105 of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (Ti-I versus Ti, p = 0.026; Ti-I versus Ti-O, p = 0.009); 71 (39 to 111) × 105, 50 (44 to 62) × 105, and 26 (9 to 31)× 105 CFU of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (Ti-I versus Ti, p = 0.026; Ti-I versus Ti-O, p = 0.034); and 77 (74 to 83) × 106, 111 (95 to 117) × 106, and 30 (21 to 45) × 106 CFU of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Ti-I versus Ti, p = 0.004; Ti-I versus Ti-O, p = 0.009). Despite the decrease in the iodine content of Ti-I after 8 weeks, it demonstrated better antibacterial activity against all tested bacteria than the Ti and Ti-O implants.

CONCLUSION

Iodine-coated implants retained their iodine content and antibacterial activity against methicillin-sensitive S. aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus, and P. aeruginosa for 8 weeks in vivo in rats. To evaluate the longer-lasting antibacterial efficacy, further research using larger infected animal PJI models with implants in the joints of both males and females is desirable.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Iodine-coated titanium implants displayed an antibacterial activity for 8 weeks in rats in vivo. Although the findings in a rat model do not guarantee efficacy in humans, they represent an important step toward clinical application.

Implications for diagnosis and treatment of peri-spinal implant infections from experiences in periprosthetic joint infections-a literature comparison and review

Both, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and peri-spinal implant infection (PSII) are serious complications occurring in arthroplasty and spine instrumentation with absolute numbers expected to rise in the next years. The currently existing literature data describing the characteristics of PSII are limited when compared to PJI studies. However, both PJI and PSII exhibit similarities concerning pathogenesis, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. This literature review aims at comparing PJI and PSII and to develop implications for diagnosis and treatment of PSII from existing studies about PJI. The review was performed on the basis of a structured PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Medline analysis and existing guidelines, with 99 references being included. The results indicate that specific terms like re-infection should be defined in the context of PSII based on existing definitions of PJI, that in vitro biofilm studies and studies analyzing different prosthesis surfaces in arthroplasty could be used for PSII, and that histopathology as an additional standard tool in PSII diagnosis might be helpful. In addition, the development of a standardized algorithm-based treatment system with antibiotic protocols, including long term suppression, for PSII similar to the ones existing for PJI is necessary.

The feasibility of iodine-supported processing for titanium with different surfaces

BACKGROUND

The reduction of microbial infections can substantially improve the success of implant surgery. The iodine-supported implants that were developed by us for infection prevention were featured at the recent International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection and were partly incorporated into the consensus guidelines. For future clinical application, we examined (1) whether iodine can be added to metals with different surface roughness, (2) differences in surface roughness before and after processing, and (3) the effect of sterilization on the iodine content.

METHODS

Four Ti-6Al-4V metals were prepared with different surface roughness values by polishing, blasting and plasma spraying. Before and after processing, the surface structure of metals was observed using a scanning electron microscope and stylus instruments. Before and after sterilization, iodine contents were measured by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy.

RESULTS

After processing, sufficient iodine contents with an antimicrobial effect were detected for each metal. These iodine contents decreased after sterilization but were higher than the lowest content of iodine observed to have an antimicrobial effect in a previous study, indicating that the antimicrobial effect persists even after sterilization. After processing, surface roughness was greater for polishing metal. With general surface processing, iodine processing was possible.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicated that surface roughness is affected by the processing method and that the iodine content should be set according to the sterilization method. Considering these factors, iodine processing can be used for clinical applications.

Antibacterial coating of implants: are we missing something?

Implant-related infection is one of the leading reasons for failure in orthopaedics and trauma, and results in high social and economic costs. Various antibacterial coating technologies have proven to be safe and effective both in preclinical and clinical studies, with post-surgical implant-related infections reduced by 90% in some cases, depending on the type of coating and experimental setup used. Economic assessment may enable the cost-to-benefit profile of any given antibacterial coating to be defined, based on the expected infection rate with and without the coating, the cost of the infection management, and the cost of the coating. After reviewing the latest evidence on the available antibacterial coatings, we quantified the impact caused by delaying their large-scale application. Considering only joint arthroplasties, our calculations indicated that for an antibacterial coating, with a final user's cost price of €600 and able to reduce post-surgical infection by 80%, each year of delay to its large-scale application would cause an estimated 35 200 new cases of post-surgical infection in Europe, equating to additional hospital costs of approximately €440 million per year. An adequate reimbursement policy for antibacterial coatings may benefit patients, healthcare systems, and related research, as could faster and more affordable regulatory pathways for the technologies still in the pipeline. This could significantly reduce the social and economic burden of implant-related infections in orthopaedics and trauma. Cite this article: C. L. Romanò, H. Tsuchiya, I. Morelli, A. G. Battaglia, L. Drago. Antibacterial coating of implants: are we missing something? Bone Joint Res 2019;8:199-206. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.85.BJR-2018-0316.