Utility of Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Disorders of Sex Development Who Undergo Prophylactic Gonadectomy

Undetectable anti-Mullerian hormone and inhibin B do not preclude the presence of germ cell tumours in 45,X/46,XY or 46,XY gonadal dysgenesis

OBJECTIVE

Individuals with 45,X/46,XY or 46,XY gonadal dysgenesis are at increased risk of germ cell malignancies. Therefore, prophylactic bilateral gonadectomy is advised in girls and considered in boys with atypical genitalia for undescended, macroscopically abnormal gonads. However, severely dysgenetic gonads may not contain germ cells rendering gonadectomy unnecessary. Therefore, we investigate if undetectable preoperative serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and inhibin B can predict the absence of germ cells, (pre)malignant or otherwise.

DESIGN, PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS

Individuals who had undergone bilateral gonadal biopsy and/or gonadectomy because of suspected gonadal dysgenesis in 1999-2019 were included in this retrospective study if preoperative AMH and/or inhibin B were available. Histological material was reviewed by an experienced pathologist. Haematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemical stainings for SOX9, OCT4, TSPY and SCF (KITL) were used.

RESULTS

Thirteen males and 16 females were included, 20 with 46,XY and 9 with 45,X/46,XY DSD. Three females had dysgerminoma alongside gonadoblastoma; two gonadoblastoma, one germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS) and three males had pre-GCNIS and/or pre-gonadoblastoma. Gonadoblastoma and/or dysgerminoma were present in 3/11 individuals with undetectable AMH and inhibin B, one of whom also had non-(pre)malignant germ cells. Of the other 18, in whom AMH and/or inhibin B were detectable, only one had no germ cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Undetectable serum AMH and inhibin B cannot reliably predict the absence of germ cells and germ cell tumours in individuals with 45,X/46,XY or 46,XY gonadal dysgenesis. This information should help in counselling about prophylactic gonadectomy, taking into account both the germ cell cancer risk and potential for gonadal function.

A Case of Swyer Syndrome Complicated with Left-sided Gonadoblastoma and Asexual Cell Tumor

Introduction: 46,XY pure gonadal dysgenesis (PGD) is also known as Swyer syndrome. The chromosome analysis indicates a 46,XY karyotype. As different degrees of gonadal hypoplasia or degeneration occur in the process of embryonic development due to several factors, gonadal dysplasia or gonadal tumors are probable. Case Presentation: The patient was a 22-year-old female with no menstruation during puberty. Her chest was funnel-shaped, the breast development was classified as Tanner III grade, the vulva was normal, the pubic hair was classified as Tanner II grade, and the vaginal long was 6 cm. The endocrine examination indicated a follicle-stimulating hormone level of 95.0 mIU/mL and an estradiol level of 34.0 pg/mL. Tumor markers, including alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), were normal. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry revealed that the bone mineral density was lower than the normal range at this age. Ultrasonography showed a hypoechoic mass in the left adnexal area, considering gonadal tissue with calcification. Pelvic MRI indicated a gonadal malignancy, and the gonadal tissue of the right adnexal area was cord-shaped. The chromosome analysis indicated a 46,XY karyotype. Accordingly, a clinical diagnosis of PGD was established. Moreover, laparoscopic gonadectomy and pathological examination were performed, and a final diagnosis of Swyer syndrome, complicated with a left-sided gonadoblastoma and asexual cell tumor, was made. Conclusion: PGD is associated with a high risk of gonadal tumors. Considering the rarity of this disease, a detailed evaluation of gonadal size and timely preventive gonadectomy are recommended for patients with gonadal dysplasia. Overall, imaging examinations can provide important information for the diagnosis of gonadal dysplasia. MRI can clearly indicate the size and shape of the gonads and the tumor, as well as the relationship between the tumor and the surrounding tissue.

Society for Endocrinology UK Guidance on the initial evaluation of a suspected difference or disorder of sex development (Revised 2021)

It is paramount that any child or adolescent with a suspected difference or disorder of sex development (DSD) is assessed by an experienced clinician with adequate knowledge about the range of conditions associated with DSD and is discussed with the regional DSD service. In most cases, the paediatric endocrinologist within this service acts as the first point of contact but involvement of the regional multidisciplinary service will also ensure prompt access to specialist psychology and nursing care. The underlying pathophysiology of DSD and the process of delineating this should be discussed with the parents and affected young person with all diagnostic tests undertaken in a timely fashion. Finally, for rare conditions such as these, it is imperative that clinical experience is shared through national and international clinical and research collaborations.

Participant- and Clinician-Reported Long-Term Outcomes After Surgery in Individuals with Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcomes of genital surgery through participant's and observer's satisfaction with the anatomical and functional result.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Multicenter cross-sectional study in 14 clinics in 6 European countries in 2014-2015.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy-one individuals with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (≥16 years old).

INTERVENTIONS

Data from clinical report files, an optional gynecological examination, patient-reported outcomes on received surgical interventions, satisfaction with appearance and function after surgery, and effect of the surgical procedure on life.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcomes were calculated per different surgical treatments. Linear regression models were used for associations with vaginal satisfaction.

RESULTS

Sixty-three participants had received surgery: 62 gonadectomies, 12 vaginal surgeries with or without vaginal dilations, 9 vaginal dilations only, and 2 breast enlargements. More than half of the participants took part in the gynecological examination. Vaginal length was similar in those without (60 mm) and with (67 mm) vaginoplasty and/or vaginal dilations. Participant- and observer-reported appearance of the genitals were generally satisfactory to good. Sexual complaints (pain or bleeding during/after intercourse) were common. Vaginal satisfaction was strongly associated with satisfaction with sex life in general, whereas vaginal interventions and number of surgeries were not. Many participants reported a negative effect of gonadectomy on their life.

CONCLUSION

Despite good genital appearance, functional problems are commonly reported, across the different nonsurgical and surgical regimens. Patient-reported outcomes should be evaluated before and after surgical procedures. Because of the negative effect on life and the low risk of malignancy, gonadectomy should be deferred to adulthood with regular follow-up.

45,X/46,XY Mosaicism in an 18-year-old Girl with Primary Amenorrhea : A Case Report

45,X/46,XY mosaicism is a rare disorder with a wide heterogeneity in its manifestations. An 18-year-old girl was referred to the endocrine clinic for investigation of her primary amenorrhea. Clinical examination was unremarkable. Hormonal profile was consistent with primary ovarian insufficiency and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) stimulation did not show evidence of active testicular tissue. Karyotyping studies by G-banding revealed a 45,X/46,XY karyotype. She was diagnosed with mosaic Turner syndrome with Y chromosomal material and investigation was performed to identify the presence of male gonads due to the risk of gonadal malignancy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis did not show evidence of gonads. Laparoscopic exploration was proposed but the patient and parents refused opting for conservative management. This case highlights the challenges in the management of this rare condition.

Role of Transperineal Ultrasound (TPUS) in Children with Ambiguous Genitalia

Objectives  Accurate delineation of anatomy in children with ambiguous genitalia early in life is important. This commonly involves conventional fluoroscopic genitogram (traumatic to the child) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination (involves sedation). In this study, our objectives were twofold: (1) to describe the findings on transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) in normal children and (2) to describe the findings on TPUS in children with ambiguous genitalia and correlate them with conventional genitogram. Materials and Methods  TPUS was prospectively performed in 10 children without genital ambiguity (5 girls and 5 boys). Subsequently, 15 consecutive children having disorders of sex differentiation (DSDs) with genital ambiguity underwent TPUS. The presence or absence of müllerian structures was documented. Of these patients, 14 also underwent conventional genitogram as a part of routine evaluation. The gold standard was established either by comparison with surgical findings (in patients who underwent surgery) or by comparison with a combination of findings on genitogram and transabdominal ultrasound in patients who did not undergo surgery. Results  In all normal children, lower urogenital tracts could be clearly delineated on TPUS. Out of the 15 children with ambiguous genitalia, TPUS could establish the presence/absence of müllerian structures in 14. This was concordant with findings on conventional genitogram/surgery. In one patient, müllerian structure was missed on TPUS but demonstrated on genitogram. In two children, TPUS showed the müllerian structure, which was not seen on genitogram. When both the controls and the cases were combined, TPUS had an accuracy of 95% and specificity of 100% in the detection of müllerian structures. Conclusion  TPUS is feasible and accurate in demonstration of lower urogenital tract anatomy in children with DSDs having ambiguous genitalia. It can be performed without sedation, and is suitable for use as a screening modality in children with ambiguous genitalia.

Diagnosis and treatment of the intra-abdominal gonad in the pediatric population: Testes, ovaries, dysgenetic gonads, streaks, and ovotestes

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Pediatric surgical specialists are often confronted with the difficult task of identifying, diagnosing and managing intra-abdominal gonads in children. Ranging from the intra-abdominal cryptorchid testis to normal or pathologic ovaries and gonads in disorders of sexual development, all intra-abdominal gonads in the pediatric population pose different diagnosis and management challenges. Understanding the hormonal and fertility potential of the gonad and knowing its potential cancer risk is essential when deciding how to manage these patients. In addition, the ideal surgical management for each one of these patients is often debated.

METHODS

Descriptive literature review.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Herein, we reviewed gonadal formation, common etiologies, diagnosis and management of intra-abdominal testes, pathologic ovaries and gonads in disorders of sexual development. Fertility potential and cancer risk for each were also reviewed and how both affect surgical management of the gonad.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Review Article, Level V.

Gonadal malignancy in patients with differences of sex development

Differences of sexual development (DSD) are known to be associated with an elevated risk of malignant and pre-malignant tumors. However, given the rarity of DSD and tumors in patients with DSD, more robust, large scale, prospective literature is required to truly determine the extent of this association, long-term outcomes and the nuances associated with the wide variety of DSD diagnoses. In addition, the spectrum of diagnoses and nomenclature has been ever-changing, limiting assessment of long-term patient outcomes. This review aims to provide an overview of the pathogenesis of DSD conditions, potential malignancies associated with the diagnoses, the available screening for malignancy, and the most recent data on stratification for each DSD diagnosis and association with malignancy.

Clinical management in mixed gonadal dysgenesis with chromosomal mosaicism: Considerations in newborns and adolescents

Individuals born on the spectrum of genetic abnormalities known as mixed gonadal dysgenesis (MGD) have a wide range of anatomical findings and management can be challenging in the newborn and adolescent. Historically, many individuals with MGD have undergone gonadectomy to avert the risk of gonadal malignancy. However, gonadectomy deprives patients of the benefits of their endogenous hormones, potential fertility, and in the case with MGD, has historically been done prior to addressing gender identity. Some patient advocates have proposed a delayed approach to surgical reconstructions and/or gonadectomy in other differences/disorders of sex development (DSD), particularly in patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia and androgen insensitivity syndrome. In many areas of the world, there continues to be a shift toward delayed reconstructions and hesitancy regarding irreversible gonadectomy. To date, no clinical management protocol addressing these issues from a patient-centered approach has been described. We review what is known about malignancy risk and propose a management protocol for those with MGD that involves shared decision making regarding the gonads and addresses the long-term challenges with regard to gender and anatomy.

Evaluation of ambiguous genitalia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide a framework for the evaluation of ambiguous genitalia.

RECENT FINDINGS

The most pressing evaluation of ambiguous genitalia is assessment for life-threatening causes such as salt-wasting congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) or syndromes with underlying anomalies such as neurologic or cardiac malformations. A multidisciplinary team, including specialists in Gynecology, Endocrinology, Urology, Genetics, Clinical Psychology/Psychiatry, Radiology, Nursing, Neonatology, and Pediatric Surgery, should be involved. Each patient should be approached in an individualized manner to assign sex of rearing in the most expeditious yet thoughtful means possible.As knowledge on the natural history of sex preference and fertility of individuals with ambiguous genitalia increases, controversy regarding the indication for and timing of genital surgery continues. Considerations include gender identity, future fertility, malignancy risk, infection prevention, and functional anatomy for sexual activity.

SUMMARY

The evaluation of ambiguous genitalia should involve a multidisciplinary team. A combination of history taking, physical examination, laboratory evaluation, and radiologic assessment can assist with the diagnosis. Care should be taken to emphasize karyotypic sex is not equivalent to gender and to use caution with regards to irreversible medical and surgical therapies which may impact fertility and sexual function and nonconform with future sex identity.

Variations of sex development: The first German interdisciplinary consensus paper

INTRODUCTION

The term variations of sex development subsumes a large number of congenital conditions including chromosomal mosaics and variations of chromosomal, gonadal, and phenotypic sex. A situation of this nature may cause severe distress to both, parents and affected persons. One of the reasons for this is the binary form of gender classification in the society. In the past, because of a fear of possible stigmatization and an inability to cope with complex situations, it has been medical policy and practice for newborns to undergo early, mostly 'feminizing' elective surgery with the aim of achieving an outer genital appearance that is unambiguously male or female. Protests by advocacy groups for the most part as well as the results of outcome studies have shown that the development of affected persons may be very different to what has been expected and often does not result in the intended clear female or male gender identity as had been intended. It, therefore, seemed a matter of urgency to implement this new awareness as well as the ethical and personal human rights perspectives in the recommendations for the medical and psychosocial management of diverse sex development (DSD) in the future.

STUDY DESIGN

In 2012, an interdisciplinary group of German academics engaged in the field of DSD decided to work on a consensus paper for this topic. It involved the participation of all faculties and non-scientific groups dealing with DSD, in particular advocacy and service-user groups. In a structured consensus, process recommendations were developed based on scientific literature as well as personal experiences of clinicians and affected individuals.

RESULTS

Finally, 37 recommendations were agreed on. The strength of consensus is reflected in the degree of agreement as expressed in percentages.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of the consensus paper reflects on the emerging paradigm shift and the necessity for a more open view of gender within society. The paper is intended to aid the performance of appropriate diagnostics in DSD-affected newborns and especially to help parents and affected persons cope with the biological and social consequences of DSD. With regard to medical or surgical therapy, it gives information about the most recent treatment trends.

[Atypical genital development and tumor risk]

Atypical genital development (AGD), also called disorders of sex development are a set of miscellaneous pathologies who have in common a morphological and/or functional abnormality of the internal and/or external genital organs. The Chicago classification identifies 3 major groups based on karyotype, hormone balance and genetic studies. Some AGD predispose to the occurrence of tumors, mainly malignant germ cell tumors. The tumor risk depends on many factors: the type of AGD, the position of the gonad, the age of the patient, the phenotype, the function of the gonad and the presence of germ cells in the gonad. AGD with the highest tumor risk are those with gonadal dysgenesis, implying an incomplete differentiation of the bipotential gonad (dysplasia). Monitoring of patients with AGD and indication of prophylactic gonadectomies should be individualized according to tumor risk.

Gonadal dysgenesis is associated with worse outcomes in patients with ovarian nondysgerminomatous tumors: A report of the Children's Oncology Group AGCT 0132 study

PURPOSE

In this report, we characterize the timing and behavior of malignant ovarian germ cell tumors (GCTs) in pediatric patients with dysgenetic gonads compared to those with normal gonadal development.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients from the Children's Oncology Group AGCT0132 with malignant ovarian GCTs were included. Within this population, we sought to identify patients with gonadoblastoma, streak ovaries, or other evidence of gonadal dysgenesis (GD). Patients with malignant GCTs containing one or more of the following histologies-yolk sac tumor, embryonal carcinoma, or choriocarcinoma-were included. Patients were compared with respect to event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Nine patients with GD, including seven with gonadoblastoma (mean age, 9.3 years), were compared to 100 non-GD patients (mean age, 12.1 years). The estimated 3-year EFS for patients with GD was 66.7% (95% CI 28.2-87.8%) and for non-GD patients was 88.8% (95% CI 80.2-93.8%). The estimated 3-year OS for patients with GD was 87.5% (95% CI 38.7-98.1%) and for non-GD patients was 97.6% (95% CI of 90.6-99.4%).

CONCLUSION

Patients presenting with nongerminomatous malignant ovarian GCTs in the context of GD have a higher rate of events and death than counterparts with normal gonads. These findings emphasize the importance of noting a contralateral streak ovary or gonadoblastoma at histology for any ovarian GCT and support the recommendation for early bilateral gonadectomy in patients known to have GD with Y chromosome material. In contrast to those with pure dysgerminoma, these patients may represent a high-risk group that requires a more aggressive chemotherapy regimen.

Normal pelvic ultrasound or MRI does not rule out neoplasm in patients with gonadal dysgenesis and Y chromosome material

INTRODUCTION

Patients with gonadal dysgenesis (GD) with a Y chromosome have an increased risk of gonadal neoplasm. Few data exist on the ability of imaging to detect malignancy in intra-abdominal gonads in these patients.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine the correlation between preoperative imaging findings and gonadal pathology in GD patients with Y chromosome material.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of patients with XY or XO/XY GD who underwent gonadectomy at our institution from 2003 to 2017. Patients were assessed preoperatively with ultrasonography; some additionally underwent MRI.

RESULTS

The series consisted of 10 patients, all with female gender and non-palpable gonads. Median age was 13.1 years (range 2.4-18.3 years). Overall, four of the ten patients (40%) had a tumor (gonadoblastoma or dysgerminoma) on final pathology. Four patients had a gonad or gonads that were definitively seen on ultrasonography. All visualized gonads were described as "normal" or "small" with the exception of one patient, who had a normal MRI. Three of the four patients in this group had a tumor on final pathology. The remaining six patients had a gonad or gonads that were not definitively visualized on ultrasound; one patient in this group had a tumor on final pathology. Overall, five of seven gonads (71%) definitively visualized on ultrasound had tumor on final pathology, and two of thirteen gonads (15%) not visualized on ultrasound had tumor on final pathology; this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.012). Three patients were imaged with MRI. Of the gonads that could be visualized on MRI, no definitive abnormalities were seen. All patients imaged with MRI had tumors on final pathology.

DISCUSSION

Both ultrasound and MRI are relatively poor at identifying and characterizing intra-abdominal gonads in GD patients. The majority of patients who had a neoplasm had normal imaging findings. Gonads that were definitively visualized on ultrasound were more likely to contain neoplasms that could not be visualized, which perhaps because of tumor growth. No other consistent imaging findings of malignancy were found. Our study included ultrasound evaluations that were completed over 10 years ago and not performed by pediatric ultrasonographers, which may have biased the results. However, results suggest that when discussing gonadectomy with GD patients, one should not be reassured by "normal" imaging findings. Neither ultrasound nor MRI should be relied on for surveillance in GD patients who decide against gonadectomy.

CONCLUSION

A normal ultrasound or MRI does not rule out neoplasm in GD patients with intra-abdominal gonads.

A practical guide for evaluating gonadal germ cell tumor predisposition in differences of sex development

Differences of Sex Development (DSD) includes a wide spectrum of etiologies and phenotypes. A subset of individuals with DSDs are predisposed to gonadal germ cell tumor (GCT). In this setting, GCT risk varies widely, depending on the DSD molecular etiology and penetrance. Prognostication based on molecular diagnosis remains challenging, as natural history data specific to recently identified molecular causes of DSD is lacking. In this review, we provide a framework for the clinical geneticist to consider GCT tumor risk in the patient with DSD. We discuss germ cell development and etiology of GCT growth, along with parameters to consider when recommending prophylactic gonadectomy including fertility, hormonal output, and malignant GTC treatment outcomes. Shortly after the 2006 reorganization of DSD nomenclature, literature reviews of natural history publications stratified GCT risk by a chromosomal, pathological, and hormonal taxonomy. Our 2017 literature review reveals a larger body of publications. However, the broad DSD GCT risk stratification within the 2006 taxonomy remains stable. We discuss precise GCT risk assessment for specific diagnoses, including androgen insensitivity, Smith-Lemli-Opitz, and 46,XY with MAP3K1 mutations and gonadal dysgenesis, as examples. We also examine the GCT risk in non-DSD syndromes, in addition to the cancer risks in DSD patients with dimorphic gonads and genitalia. This review is intended to provide a nuanced assessment of relative germ cell tumor risk in the DSD patient, including modern precise molecular diagnosis, for use by the clinical geneticist.

Gonadal dysgenesis in disorders of sex development: Diagnosis and surgical management

Recent studies on gonadal histology have improved the understanding of germ cell malignancy risk in patients with disorders of sex development (DSD), and evidence-based gonadal management strategies are gradually emerging. Especially in 46,XY DSD and 45,X/46,XY DSD, which are characterized by gonadal dysgenesis, the risk of germ cell malignancy is significantly increased. This paper summarized the progress over the past 10 years in malignancy risk assessment in patients with DSD, and its implications for optimal surgical handling of the involved gonads.