The Use of Telemedicine in Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology

Telemedicine for Adolescent and Young Adult Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Post-insertion Visits: Outcomes over 1 Year

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Telemedicine for long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) care is understudied given the rapid implementation of these services in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We compared outcomes over 1 year of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) attending a LARC post-insertion visit via telemedicine vs in person.

DESIGN

Longitudinal cohort study.

SETTING

Four academic adolescent medicine clinics in the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

AYAs (ages 13-26 years) who received LARC between 4/1/20 and 3/1/21 and attended a post-insertion visit within 12 weeks.

INTERVENTIONS

none.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcomes over 1 year were compared between AYAs who completed this visit via telemedicine vs in person. We analyzed the data using descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, and regression models.

RESULTS

Of 194 AYAs (ages 13.9-25.7 years) attending a post-insertion visit, 40.2% utilized telemedicine. Menstrual management (odds ratio (OR) = 1.02; confidence interval (CI): 0.40-2.60), acne management (P = .28), number of visits attended (relative risk (RR) = 1.08; CI: 0.99-1.19), and LARC removal (P = .95) were similar between groups. AYAs attending via telemedicine were less likely than those attending in person to have STI testing (P = .001). Intrauterine device expulsion or malposition and arm symptoms with implant in situ were rare outcomes in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Roughly 40% of AYAs attended a post-insertion visit via telemedicine during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic and had similar 1-year outcomes as those attending in person. The decreased likelihood of STI testing for those using telemedicine highlights the need to provide alternative options, when indicated, such as asynchronous or home testing. Our results support the use of telemedicine for AYA LARC post-insertion care and identify potential gaps in telemedicine care which can help improve clinic protocols.

Patient and provider perspectives on telemedicine use in an outpatient gynecologic clinic serving a diverse, low-income population

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate patient and provider experiences using telemedicine for gynecologic visits among a diverse, low-income population.

METHODS

Patients attending telemedicine visits at a resident-run gynecology clinic completed a modified Telemedicine Usability Questionnaire and providers completed a survey addressing satisfaction and barriers for each visit. The Telemedicine Usability Questionnaire included six subscales to assess telemedicine usability with 1-5 Likert-scale responses. Statistical analyses included Chi-square, Fisher's exact, Wilcoxon rank sum, Wilcoxon signed-rank, and two-sample t-test.

RESULTS

Of 192 patients enrolled, 157 (82%) completed the surveys (87% video visits, 13% telephone visits). Most patients were ethnic minorities (non-Hispanic White-16%, Hispanic-32%, Black-28%, Asian-10%), median age was 40 years (range 18-69), and 63% reported income under $40,000. The total mean Telemedicine Usability Questionnaire score was 4.3/5. The reliability subscale score (3.72/5) was lower compared to all other subscales (p < 0.001). Older respondents were more likely to find telemedicine unreliable (mean age >44 vs <39, p = 0.02). Without telemedicine, 54% would have traveled ≥1 h to appointments, with 46% spending over $35 on travel, and 27% missing ≥ 1 workday. Patients preferred telemedicine for follow-up rather than initial visits (81% vs 33%, p < 0.01). Among providers, residents felt less adequately trained in telemedicine compared to nurse practitioners and fellows (54% vs 46%, p = 0.039).

CONCLUSION

Low-income women utilizing telemedicine for outpatient gynecologic care report positive experiences with improved access to healthcare, cost, and time savings compared to in-person visits. Provider experiences were also positive; however, teaching hospitals must evaluate whether trainee providers feel adequately trained to deliver telemedicine visits.

Telemedicine for Adolescent and Young Adult Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Follow-Up Care amidst a Global Pandemic

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To describe adolescent and young adult (AYA) long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) follow-up care via telemedicine in the year following the COVID-19 pandemic onset DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study SETTING: Three academic adolescent medicine clinics in the United States PARTICIPANTS: AYAs using LARC INTERVENTIONS: None MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were patient characteristics, visit information (frequency, timing, and modality), patient-reported symptoms, and outcomes for those presenting for LARC follow-up care between April 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the sample. χ² tests and t tests were used to compare groups. Adjusted logistic regression models using general estimating equations were applied to assess factors associated with telemedicine visits and to examine visit outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 319 AYAs (ages 13.6-25.7 years), 40.1% attended at least one LARC telemedicine visit. Patients attending any telemedicine encounter vs only in-person visits had similar demographic and clinical characteristics. Of the 426 follow-up visits, 270 (63.4%) were conducted in person and 156 (36.6%) were performed via telemedicine. Most visits (62.7%) occurred within 12 months of device insertion. Reports of bothersome uterine bleeding beyond patient expectations (OR = 1.26; 95% CI, 0.80-1.96), any symptom (OR = 1.40; 95% CI, 0.94-2.10), or 2 or more symptoms (OR = 1.22; 95% CI, 0.67-2.22) at follow-up was not associated, positively or negatively, with mode of follow-up. Management of bleeding (OR = 1.27; 95% CI, 0.56-2.89), management of acne (P = .46), and need for rapid follow-up (P = .33) were similar between follow-up modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient demographic/clinical characteristics and visit outcomes were similar between telemedicine and in-person LARC follow-up. Telemedicine could play an important role in AYA LARC care.

Telehealth Care in a Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology Clinic During the COVID-19 Pandemic

BACKGROUND

Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, health care systems have increased their telehealth services to meet the changing public health needs. Before the pandemic, telehealth was used primarily in surgical specialties for postoperative visits and rural medicine. However, out of necessity, nearly all medical and surgical subspecialties incorporated this virtual technology to improve patient health care access in a short time. Few studies have addressed telehealth in pediatric and adolescent gynecology (PAG) to date.

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To describe the large-scale utilization of telehealth visits, assess patient experience, and improve access to care in a large academic ambulatory gynecology PAG clinic METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional quality improvement study was performed by administering patient surveys and compiling aggregate data from the EPIC electronic health record in the Division of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology clinics at a single children's hospital between March 2020 and March 2021. Patient demographic characteristics, payer characteristics, visit type and purpose, and patient experience were reviewed.

INTERVENTIONS

Wider expansion of telehealth in PAG clinics at a single institution RESULTS: A total of 6159 telehealth appointments were performed, involving 6 clinic sites and 9 providers. Telehealth visits constituted 50% of the total ambulatory volume (12,527). Most patients were located within the institution's state (99.5%), and the remaining called into their telehealth visits from a neighboring state. Most patients were 18 years of age or younger (73%). Video visits lasted 15-30 minutes and included routine follow-up (66.3%), new/consult visits (28.4%), postoperative visits (1.6%), and urgent follow-up (0.2%). The patient population was ethnically diverse by self-identification: 61.4% White, 38.4% Hispanic, 16% Black, 4.4% Asian, and 0.4% Native Hawaiian/American Indian/Alaska Native. Payer mix included self-pay (45.5%), private payer (32.2%), and Medicaid/CHIP (22.3%). Conditions seen ranged from menstrual management (71%) and routine preventive or acute gynecologic concerns (21%) to surgical evaluation for congenital anomalies, endometriosis, fertility preservation, and genital concerns or pelvic masses (8%). Telehealth visits met patient expectations for 87.3% of respondents. Patient-reported opportunities for improvement included improving set-up instructions and more consistent audio/video connections. Challenges identified by providers included difficulty utilizing interpreters, technology limitations, and privacy constraints during HEADSS examination.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates how a large, diverse volume of patients with PAG needs received appropriate care through a telehealth format during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients were satisfied with the services, but opportunities for improvement were elicited to allow for continued refining of this health care delivery tool in the future.