The Relationship Between Pacing and Avoidance in Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

[Psychocorporal approach to functional somatic disorders]

Functional somatic disorders (FSD) are common conditions that result in a significant deterioration of the quality of life. Their origin is multifactorial and poorly understood, and their management is often inadequately defined. Medications typically show limited effectiveness, while mind-body approaches play a central role, guided by three key principles: establishing an empathetic, respectful, and sincere doctor-patient relationship; promoting regular and gradual physical activity; and implementing cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Special attention must be devoted to establishing a trustworthy relationship between the physician and the patient. Recognizing the reality and severity of symptoms and providing a positive diagnosis as well as an explanatory model to account for them rationally are fundamental aspects of patient management. Cognitive and behavioral maintenance factors should be investigated and constitute therapeutic targets. Cognitive factors include focused attention on body functioning and catastrophizing. Patients frequently display avoidance behaviors, particularly in relation to physical exertion, and it is crucial to motivate them to reintroduce gradual physical activity customized to their abilities. This approach has demonstrated efficacy in improving fatigue, pain, and the physical and mental quality of life for patients with FSD. Among psychotherapeutic approaches, the benefit of CBT is well-established. The combination of gradual physical activity and CBT appears to be complementary. Other mind-body approaches such as mindfulness meditation might help although their level of evidence is weaker. Given the prevalence of FSD in the general population, it seems necessary for all physicians to be trained in managing this condition.

The Activity Management Inventory for Pain (AMI-P): Initial Development and Validation of a Questionnaire Based on Operant Learning and Energy Conservation Models of Activity Management

OBJECTIVES

Activity management is an important treatment component in chronic pain programs. However, there are shortcomings in measures of this construct, leading to inconsistencies in research findings. Here, we describe the development of the Activity Management Inventory for Pain (AMI-P).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The AMI-P was developed by a group of international researchers with extensive expertise in both chronic pain and activity management. The initial evaluation of the AMI-P items included 2 studies that were both conducted in Canadian tertiary pain care centers.

RESULTS

The resulting 20-item measure has 3 behavior scales (Rest, Alternating Activity, and Planned Activity), and 4 goal scales (Feel Less Pain, Get More Done, Complete the Task, and Save Energy). The behavior scales evidenced marginal to good internal consistency and test-retest reliability, and a moderate positive association with an existing pacing measure. The Rest and Alternating Activity scales were associated with greater pain interference, the Alternating Activity and Planned Activity scales were associated with less satisfaction with social roles, and the Planned Activity scale was associated with fewer depressive symptoms. The Alternating Activity scale increased significantly from pretreatment to posttreatment. All goal scales were positively associated with all behavior scales. The Feel Less Pain goal scale was positively associated with measures of avoidance and pain interference, while the Get More Done goal scale was negatively associated with measures of depressive symptoms and overdoing.

DISCUSSION

The findings support the reliability and validity of the AMI-P scales, while also highlighting the complexity and multidimensional aspects of activity management.

Task-based measures of sensitivity to physical activity predict daily life pain and mood among people living with back pain

BACKGROUND

Clinical interventions aim to improve the daily life experiences of patients. However, past research has highlighted important discrepancies between commonly used assessments (e.g. retrospective questionnaires) and patients' daily life experiences of pain. These gaps may contribute to flawed clinical decision-making and ineffective care. Recent work suggests that real-time, task-based clinical assessments may help reduce these discrepancies by adding predictive value in explaining daily life pain experiences. This study aimed to investigate these relationships by evaluating whether task-based measures of sensitivity to physical activity (SPA) predict daily life pain and mood, beyond traditional pain-related questionnaires.

METHODS

Adults with back pain (<6-month onset) answered pain-related questionnaires and completed a standardized lifting task. SPA-Pain, SPA-Sensory and SPA-Mood were, respectively, assessed as task-evoked changes in pain intensity, pressure pain threshold (back, hands), situational catastrophizing. Over the next 9 days, daily life pain and mood were assessed using smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA-Pain and EMA-Mood, respectively) with stratified random sampling. Data analyses estimated fixed effects (b) using multilevel linear modelling with random intercepts.

RESULTS

Median EMA completion per participant was 66.67% (n = 67 participants). After controlling for covariates, SPA-Pain was associated with EMA-Pain (b = 0.235, p = 0.002) and SPA-Psych approached significance with EMA-Mood (b = -0.159, p = 0.052).

CONCLUSIONS

Task-based assessment of SPA helps explain daily life pain and mood among adults with back pain, beyond traditional questionnaires. Adding task-based assessment of SPA may achieve a more complete picture of pain and mood in daily life, offering clinicians better guidance when prescribing activity-based interventions that are designed to modify daily life behaviour, such as graded activity.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study found that, among people with back pain, task-based measures of sensitivity to physical activity contribute additional predictive value for daily life pain and mood beyond self-report questionnaires. Findings suggest that real-time, task-based measures may help mitigate some of the shortcomings that are commonly associated with retrospective questionnaires.

Validation of the Japanese version of the patterns of activity measure-pain in individuals with chronic pain

Background

The Patterns of Activity Measure-Pain (POAM-P) is a self-report questionnaire that measures avoidance, overdoing, and pacing in individuals with chronic pain. We aimed to develop and confirm the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the POAM-P(POAM-P-J) in Japanese individuals with chronic pain.

Methods

We recruited 147 Japanese individuals with chronic pain (106 women; mean age 64.89 ± 12.13 years). The individuals completed the POAM-P-J, the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The following psychometric properties of the POAM-P-J were confirmed: structural validity, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and concurrent validity.

Results

We tested factor structure via confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). We chose the 3-factor model with six covariances. The POAM-P-J’s internal consistency and test–retest reliability were acceptable to good (α = 0.79–0.86; ICC = 0.72–0.87). The avoidance and overdoing subscales were positively associated with pain severity, pain interference, and anxiety measures (all p < 0.05), but the pacing subscale was not significantly associated with these pain-related measures.

Conclusions

Although the structural validity of the POAM-P-J remains questionable, its internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and concurrent validity were confirmed. The POAM-P-J is useful in both research and clinical practice for evaluating the activity patterns of Japanese patients with chronic pain.

The Activity Patterns Scale: An Analysis of its Construct Validity in Women With Fibromyalgia

OBJECTIVES

Avoidance, persistence, and pacing are activity patterns that have different adaptive effects in chronic pain patients. Some inconsistent findings have been explained from a contextual perspective that underlines the purpose of the activity. In this way, avoidance, persistence, and pacing are multidimensional constructs, nuanced by their goals. This multidimensionality has been supported with a new instrument, the Activity Patterns Scale, in heterogeneous chronic pain samples. Owing to the clinical implications of this conceptualization, the complexity of the activity patterns and their relationships with health outcomes in fibromyalgia (FM), our aim was to explore the construct validity of this scale in this pain problem, testing its internal structure and the relationships with other constructs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The sample included 702 women with diagnosis of FM from tertiary (53.3%) and community settings (46.7%). Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to test different factor structures of the activity patterns and Pearson correlation to explore the relationships with health outcomes and psychosocial variables.

RESULTS

A 6-factor structure showed acceptable fit indices (standardized root mean square residual=0.062; root mean-square error of approximation=0.066; comparative fit index=0.908). The highest significant relationships for health outcomes was between activity avoidance and FM impact (r=0.36) and excessive persistence and negative affect (r=0.41).

DISCUSSION

Avoidance and persistence activity patterns are shown as multidimensional constructs but not pacing. The ongoing pain in these women may make it difficult to regulate their activity taking into account other goals not contingent on pain fluctuations.

Development and Initial Evaluation of the Patterns of Activity Measure-Pain Short Form

OBJECTIVES

There has been growing interest in examining pain-related activity patterns and their relationships to psychosocial functioning. The Patterns of Activity Measure-Pain (POAM-P) is frequently used to measure 3 pain-related activity patterns: avoidance, overdoing, and pacing. Although the POAM-P possesses excellent psychometric properties, its length may limit its utility where multiple measures of functioning are required or the time available for assessment is limited. The present studies describe the development and evaluation of a short-form version of this measure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In Study 1, 775 individuals with ongoing pain completed the original POAM-P at the start of a treatment program. Item analyses were conducted to construct a short-form of the POAM-P. In Study 2, a separate sample of 171 individuals completed the original and short-form of the POAM-P, and measures of psychosocial functioning. Correlations between the short-form and original, and between the short-form and measures of psychosocial functioning were examined to evaluate the reliability and validity of the short-form.

RESULTS

The 3 scales of the short-form were found to have excellent internal consistency and correlated well with corresponding scales on the original POAM-P. Correlations between scales on the short-form and measures of psychosocial functioning supported the construct validity of the measure.

DISCUSSION

The short-form of the POAM-P possesses good psychometric properties and correlates well with the long-form of the measure. It appears to be a promising addition to existing measures of pain-related activity. It may be useful as an addition to questionnaire batteries that comprehensively assess the psychosocial functioning of individuals with ongoing pain.

Theoretical Grounds of Pain Tracker Self Manager: An Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Digital Intervention for Patients with Chronic Pain

OBJECTIVE

To report the theoretical basis and design of a novel digital Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) intervention for people with chronic pain, the Pain Tracker Self Manager (PTSM), which had promising efficacy in a recent pilot trial.

METHODS

Content development by a multidisciplinary panel of experts in psychiatry, clinical psychology, nursing and social work, with feedback from a group of patients with chronic pain and their providers. Materials included paper-based sketching of a story character, visual metaphors, and a series of stories designed to deliver the theory-based components of our behavioral intervention.

RESULTS

This development and design process resulted in 4 digitally delivered clinical modules that combine visual and verbal cues. In addition, it generated a series of novel ACT metaphors specifically tailored to patients with chronic pain: Pain: Injury vs. Threat, Life Navigation System, The Fog of Pain, and Get Rhythm. Consistent with ACT theory and the contextual behavioral science framework, PTSM utilized: perspective-taking, values clarification, acceptance strategies, and nursing and psychological care recommendations.

DISCUSSION

Reports of the design and theoretical basis of digital health interventions are highly needed to increase the rigor of their development process and more progressively advance our body of knowledge. This pilot study developed and tested a series of ACT metaphors that can be readily used by ACT clinicians working with this population.

CONCLUSION

PTSM is a novel digital ACT intervention for patients with chronic pain with features directly linked to ACT processes and theory.

Survey of activity pacing across healthcare professionals informs a new activity pacing framework for chronic pain/fatigue

INTRODUCTION

Activity pacing is considered a key component of rehabilitation programmes for chronic pain/fatigue. However, there are no widely used guidelines to standardize how pacing is delivered. This study aimed to undertake the first stage in developing a comprehensive evidence-based activity pacing framework.

METHODS

An online survey across pain/fatigue services in English National Health Service trusts explored healthcare professionals' opinions on the types/uses of pacing, aims, facets and perceived effects. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics for closed-ended questions and thematic analysis for open-ended questions. Purposeful recruitment with a snowball effect engaged 92 healthcare professionals (physiotherapists, occupational therapists, nurses, doctors and psychologists) to the study.

RESULTS

Pacing was highly utilized, with perceived long-term benefits for patients (n = 83, 90.2% healthcare professionals instructed pacing). The most endorsed aim of pacing was "achievement of meaningful activities" (24.5% of ranked votes). The least endorsed aim was "to conserve energy" (0.1% of ranked votes). The most frequently supported facet of pacing was "breaking down tasks" (n = 91, 98.9%). The least supported facet was "stopping activities when symptoms increase" (n = 6, 6.5%). Thematic analysis showed recurring themes that pacing involved flexibility and sense of choice.

CONCLUSIONS

Pacing is a multidimensional coping strategy and complex behaviour. The message is clear that pacing should enable increases in meaningful activities, as opposed to attempting to avoid symptoms. The survey findings have informed the development of an activity pacing framework to guide healthcare professionals on the multiple components of pacing. This will help to standardize and optimize treatments for chronic pain/fatigue and enable future investigations.

Patterns of pain-related activity: replicability, treatment-related changes, and relationship to functioning

Changes in activity patterns frequently accompany the experience of chronic pain. Two activity patterns, avoidance and overdoing, are hypothesized to contribute to the development of ongoing pain and pain-related disability, while activity pacing is frequently introduced to enhance pain management and functioning. Two studies were conducted to assess whether reliable subgroups with differing activity patterns could be identified in different pain populations and to evaluate changes in these subgroups after a group format, pain management program. In study 1, individuals with ongoing pain being assessed for treatment at 2 different tertiary care pain centres completed a measure of pain-related activity. Separate cluster analyses of these samples produced highly similar cluster solutions. For each sample, a 2-cluster solution was obtained with clusters corresponding to the activity patterns described by the avoidance-endurance model of pain. In study 2, a subset of individuals completing a 12-session, group format, pain management program completed measures of pain-related activity, pain intensity, and physical and psychological functioning at the beginning and end of the program. At the conclusion of the program, 4 clusters of pain-related activity were identified. Individuals who used high levels of activity pacing and low levels of avoidance consistently reported significantly better functioning relative to all other individuals. Observed changes in activity patterns from pre-treatment to post-treatment suggested that decreasing the association between activity pacing and avoidance was associated with better functioning. These results have implications for both the assessment of activity pacing and for its use as an intervention in the management of ongoing pain.

Avoidance, pacing, or persistence in multidisciplinary functional rehabilitation for chronic musculoskeletal pain: An observational study with cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses

Background

Three main activity patterns have been distinguished in describing chronic pain (avoidance, pacing and persistence). However, their influence on patient outcomes remains a question of debate. This observational study aimed to measure the associations between the avoidance, pacing, and persistence (labelled overdoing) scales of the Patterns of Activity Measure–Pain (POAM-P), self-reported outcomes (pain-interference, depression, functional ability), and observational outcomes (walking, lifting test, physical fitness).

Methods

We conducted an observational study with cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. The data were collected prospectively before and after treatment, which was a 5-week functional rehabilitation including vocational aspects. In addition to self-reported and observational outcomes, patients were asked if they thought they would be able to return to work at 6 months. Analyses were conducted with treatment effect sizes, correlations, and multiple regression models.

Results

In this sample (891 patients), we found on average small to moderate improvements for pain-interference and observational outcomes (Cohen’s d: 0.37 to 0.64). According to the multivariable models, overdoing was associated with most of the beneficial psychosocial and observational outcomes (β -0.13 to 0.17; all p<0.01). Avoidance was related to negative psychosocial outcomes before treatment (β -0.09 to 0.17; all p<0.015). Pacing, which had moderate correlation with avoidance (r = 0.46), was not associated with most of the outcomes. The feeling that the goal of returning to work was attainable was associated with lower avoidance scores (adjusted OR 0.97; p = 0.024).

Conclusions

The overdoing POAM-P scale probably measures a task-contingent persistence, which appears appropriate in the setting of this study. Persistent behavior was indeed related to small or moderate positive biopsychosocial outcomes, before and after treatment. Moreover feeling able to return to work was related to lower avoidance. Further studies should test the efficacy of motivational strategies that may promote functional task-contingent persistence and reduce avoidance of painful tasks.

Current Evidence-Based Interdisciplinary Treatment Options for Pediatric Musculoskeletal Pain

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We review the prevalence of pediatric chronic musculoskeletal pain, the clinical need, the evidence for pharmacological, psychological, physical and, complementary approaches to pain management, and the possible future development of interdisciplinary and distance care.

RECENT FINDINGS

We summarize the Cochrane Systematic Reviews on pharmacological interventions, which show a lack of evidence to support or refute the use of all classes of medication for the management of pain. The trials for NSAIDs did not show any superiority over comparators, nor did those of anti-depressants, and there are no trials for paracetamol, or of opioid medications. There are studies of psychological interventions which show promise and increasing support for physical therapy. The optimal approach remains an intensive interdisciplinary programmatic treatment, although this service is not available to most.

SUMMARY

1. Given the absence of evidence, a program of trials is now urgently required to establish the evidence base for analgesics that are widely prescribed for children and adolescents with chronic musculoskeletal pain. 2. Until that evidence becomes available, medicine review is an essential task in this population. 3. We need more examples and efficacy evaluations of intensive interdisciplinary interventions for chronic pain management, described in detail so that researchers and clinicians can unpack possible active treatment components. 4. Online treatments are likely to be critical in the future. We need to determine which aspects of treatment for which children and adolescents can be effectively delivered in this way, which will help reduce the burden of the large number of patients needing support from a small number of experts.