1
|
Riley SR, Voisin C, Stevens EE, Bose-Brill S, Moss KO. Tools for tomorrow: a scoping review of patient-facing tools for advance care planning. Palliat Care Soc Pract 2024; 18:26323524241263108. [PMID: 39045292 PMCID: PMC11265253 DOI: 10.1177/26323524241263108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Advance care planning (ACP) supports individuals in aligning their medical care with personal values and preferences in the face of serious illness. The variety of ACP tools available reflects diverse strategies intended to facilitate these critical conversations, yet evaluations of their effectiveness often show mixed results. Following the Arskey and O'Malley framework, this scoping review aims to synthesize the range of ACP tools targeted at patients and families, highlighting their characteristics and delivery methods to better understand their impact and development over time. Studies included focused on patient-facing ACP tools across all settings and mediums. Exclusions were applied to studies solely targeting healthcare providers or those only aiming at completion of advance directives without broader ACP discussions. Searches were conducted across PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Data were extracted using a predesigned spreadsheet, capturing study population, setting, intervention modality, and intervention theme. Tools were categorized by delivery method and further analyzed through a year-wise distribution to track trends and developments. We identified 99 unique patient-facing tools, with those focusing on counseling (31) and video technologies (21) being the most prevalent while others incorporated online platforms, print materials, games, or some combination of different delivery methods. Over half the tools were designed for specific patient groups, especially for various diseases and racial or ethnic communities. Recent years showed a surge in tool variety and innovation, including integrated patient portals and psychological techniques. The review demonstrates a broad array of innovative ACP tools that facilitate personalized and effective ACP. Our findings contribute to an enhanced understanding of their utilization and potential impacts, offering valuable insights for future tool development and policy making in ACP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean R. Riley
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, 2050 Kenny Road, Columbus, OH 43215, USA
- Center for Health Outcomes in Medicine Scholarship and Service, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
- Division of Health Services Management and Policy, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Christiane Voisin
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
- Center for Health Outcomes in Medicine Scholarship and Service, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Erin E. Stevens
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
- The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Seuli Bose-Brill
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
- Center for Health Outcomes in Medicine Scholarship and Service, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Karen O. Moss
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
- Center for Health Outcomes in Medicine Scholarship and Service, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
- Center for Healthy Aging, Self-Management, and Complex Care, The Ohio State University College of Nursing, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Haimovich AD, Burke RC, Nathanson LA, Rubins D, Taylor RA, Kross EK, Ouchi K, Shapiro NI, Schonberg MA. Geriatric End-of-Life Screening Tool Prediction of 6-Month Mortality in Older Patients. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2414213. [PMID: 38819823 PMCID: PMC11143461 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.14213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Emergency department (ED) visits by older adults with life-limiting illnesses are a critical opportunity to establish patient care end-of-life preferences, but little is known about the optimal screening criteria for resource-constrained EDs. Objectives To externally validate the Geriatric End-of-Life Screening Tool (GEST) in an independent population and compare it with commonly used serious illness diagnostic criteria. Design, Setting, and Participants This prognostic study assessed a cohort of patients aged 65 years and older who were treated in a tertiary care ED in Boston, Massachusetts, from 2017 to 2021. Patients arriving in cardiac arrest or who died within 1 day of ED arrival were excluded. Data analysis was performed from August 1, 2023, to March 27, 2024. Exposure GEST, a logistic regression algorithm that uses commonly available electronic health record (EHR) datapoints and was developed and validated across 9 EDs, was compared with serious illness diagnoses as documented in the EHR. Serious illnesses included stroke/transient ischemic attack, liver disease, cancer, lung disease, and age greater than 80 years, among others. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was 6-month mortality following an ED encounter. Statistical analyses included area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration analyses, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and decision curves. Results This external validation included 82 371 ED encounters by 40 505 unique individuals (mean [SD] age, 76.8 [8.4] years; 54.3% women, 13.8% 6-month mortality rate). GEST had an external validation area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.78-0.79) that was stable across years and demographic subgroups. Of included encounters, 53.4% had a serious illness, with a sensitivity of 77.4% (95% CI, 76.6%-78.2%) and specificity of 50.5% (95% CI, 50.1%-50.8%). Varying GEST cutoffs from 5% to 30% increased specificity (5%: 49.1% [95% CI, 48.7%-49.5%]; 30%: 92.2% [95% CI, 92.0%-92.4%]) at the cost of sensitivity (5%: 89.3% [95% CI, 88.8-89.9]; 30%: 36.2% [95% CI, 35.3-37.1]). In a decision curve analysis, GEST outperformed serious illness criteria across all tested thresholds. When comparing patients referred to intervention by GEST with serious illness criteria, GEST reclassified 45.1% of patients with serious illness as having low risk of mortality with an observed mortality rate 8.1% and 2.6% of patients without serious illness as having high mortality risk with an observed mortality rate of 34.3% for a total reclassification rate of 25.3%. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this study suggest that both serious illness criteria and GEST identified older ED patients at risk for 6-month mortality, but GEST offered more useful screening characteristics. Future trials of serious illness interventions for high mortality risk in older adults may consider transitioning from diagnosis code criteria to GEST, an automatable EHR-based algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian D. Haimovich
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ryan C. Burke
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Larry A. Nathanson
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David Rubins
- Department of Internal Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - R. Andrew Taylor
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Erin K. Kross
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Kei Ouchi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nathan I. Shapiro
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mara A. Schonberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Evans SK, Ober AJ, Korn AR, Peltz A, Friedmann PD, Page K, Murray-Krezan C, Huerta S, Ryzewicz SJ, Tarhuni L, Nuckols TK, E Watkins K, Danovitch I. Contextual barriers and enablers to establishing an addiction-focused consultation team for hospitalized adults with opioid use disorder. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2024; 19:31. [PMID: 38671482 PMCID: PMC11046820 DOI: 10.1186/s13722-024-00461-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospitalization presents an opportunity to begin people with opioid use disorder (OUD) on medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and link them to care after discharge; regrettably, people admitted to the hospital with an underlying OUD typically do not receive MOUD and are not connected with subsequent treatment for their condition. To address this gap, we launched a multi-site randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a hospital-based addiction consultation team (the Substance Use Treatment and Recovery Team (START)) consisting of an addiction medicine specialist and care manager team that provide collaborative care and a specified intervention to people with OUD during the inpatient stay. Successful implementation of new practices can be impacted by organizational context, though no previous studies have examined context prior to implementation of addiction consultation services (ACS). This study assessed pre-implementation context for implementing a specialized ACS and tailoring it accordingly. METHODS We conducted semi-structured interviews with hospital administrators, physicians, physician assistants, nurses, and social workers at the three study sites between April and August 2021 before the launch of the pragmatic trial. Using an analytical framework based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we completed a thematic analysis of interview data to understand potential barriers or enablers and perceptions about acceptability and feasibility. RESULTS We interviewed 28 participants across three sites. The following themes emerged across sites: (1) START is an urgently needed model for people with OUD; (2) Intervention adaptations are recommended to meet local and cultural needs; (3) Linking people with OUD to community clinicians is a highly needed component of START; (4) It is important to engage stakeholders across departments and roles throughout implementation. Across sites, participants generally saw a need for change from usual care to support people with OUD, and thought the START was acceptable and feasible to implement. Differences among sites included tailoring the START to support the needs of varying patient populations and different perceptions of the prevalence of OUD. CONCLUSIONS Hospitals planning to implement an ACS in the inpatient setting may wish to engage in a systematic pre-implementation contextual assessment using a similar framework to understand and address potential barriers and contextual factors that may impact implementation. Pre-implementation work can help ensure the ACS and other new practices fit within each unique hospital context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra K Evans
- RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, 90407‑2138, Santa Monica, CA, P.O. Box 2138, USA.
| | - Allison J Ober
- RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, 90407‑2138, Santa Monica, CA, P.O. Box 2138, USA
| | - Ariella R Korn
- RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, 90407‑2138, Santa Monica, CA, P.O. Box 2138, USA
| | - Alex Peltz
- RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, 90407‑2138, Santa Monica, CA, P.O. Box 2138, USA
| | - Peter D Friedmann
- Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School-Baystate and Baystate Health, 3601 Main Street, 3rd Floor, 01107, Springfield, MA, USA
| | - Kimberly Page
- University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, 1 University, MSC10 5550, 87133, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Cristina Murray-Krezan
- Departement of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 200 Meyran Ave, Suite 300, 15213, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sergio Huerta
- University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, 1 University, MSC10 5550, 87133, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Stephen J Ryzewicz
- Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School-Baystate and Baystate Health, 3601 Main Street, 3rd Floor, 01107, Springfield, MA, USA
| | - Lina Tarhuni
- University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, 1 University, MSC10 5550, 87133, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Teryl K Nuckols
- RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, 90407‑2138, Santa Monica, CA, P.O. Box 2138, USA
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, 90048, West Hollywood, CA, USA
| | - Katherine E Watkins
- RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, 90407‑2138, Santa Monica, CA, P.O. Box 2138, USA
| | - Itai Danovitch
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, 90048, West Hollywood, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ouchi K, Joshi C, Kaithamattam J, Gale SA, Marshall GA, Pietras A, Wang W, Boyer EW, Tulsky JA, Block SD, Rentz D, Schonberg MA. Refinement of an Emergency Department-Based, Advance Care Planning Intervention for Patients With Cognitive Impairment and Their Caregivers. THE GERONTOLOGIST 2024; 64:gnad020. [PMID: 36848220 PMCID: PMC10733123 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnad020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2022] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Advance care planning (ACP) conversations are important to provide goal-concordant care (i.e., the care that matches the patient's previously stated goals) near end of life. While 31% of older adults presenting to the emergency department (ED) have dementia, only 39% have previously had ACP conversations. We refined and piloted an ED-based, motivational interview designed to stimulate ACP conversations (ED GOAL) for patients living with cognitive impairment and their caregivers. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We systematically refined ED GOAL and then conducted an acceptability study in an urban, academic medical center. We prospectively enrolled adults aged 50+ with cognitive impairment and their caregivers. Trained clinicians conducted the intervention. We measured acceptability after the intervention and participants' ACP engagement at baseline and 1-month follow-up. RESULTS Specific statements to address both the patient and caregiver were added to the ED GOAL script. Of 60 eligible patient/caregiver dyads approached, 26 participated, and 20 (77%) completed follow-up assessments. Patient mean age was 79 years (SD 8.5); 65% were female, 92.3% were White, 96.2% were non-Hispanic, and 69% had moderate dementia. Most patients/caregivers reported feeling completely heard and understood by the study clinician about their future medical care preferences (58%, 15/26). They also reported that the study clinician was very respectful (96%, 25/26) when eliciting those preferences. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS Patients living with cognitive impairment and their caregivers found our refined ED GOAL acceptable and respectful. Future studies need to examine the effect of ED GOAL on ACP engagement among these dyads in the ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kei Ouchi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Christopher Joshi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- School of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Jenson Kaithamattam
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Seth A Gale
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gad A Marshall
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alison Pietras
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Wei Wang
- Division of Circadian and Sleep Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Edward W Boyer
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - James A Tulsky
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Susan D Block
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dorene Rentz
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mara A Schonberg
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang T, Ho MH, Xu X, Choi HR, Lin CC. Motivational interviews to enhance advance care plans in older adults: systematic review. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2023:spcare-2023-004424. [PMID: 37709366 DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Tongyao Wang
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Mu-Hsing Ho
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Xinyi Xu
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Hye Ri Choi
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Chia-Chin Lin
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Haimovich AD, Xu W, Wei A, Schonberg MA, Hwang U, Taylor RA. Automatable end-of-life screening for older adults in the emergency department using electronic health records. J Am Geriatr Soc 2023; 71:1829-1839. [PMID: 36744550 PMCID: PMC10258151 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emergency department (ED) visits are common at the end-of-life, but the identification of patients with life-limiting illness remains a key challenge in providing timely and resource-sensitive advance care planning (ACP) and palliative care services. To date, there are no validated, automatable instruments for ED end-of-life screening. Here, we developed a novel electronic health record (EHR) prognostic model to screen older ED patients at high risk for 6-month mortality and compare its performance to validated comorbidity indices. METHODS This was a retrospective, observational cohort study of ED visits from adults aged ≥65 years who visited any of 9 EDs across a large regional health system between 2014 and 2019. Multivariable logistic regression that included clinical and demographic variables, vital signs, and laboratory data was used to develop a 6-month mortality predictive model-the Geriatric End-of-life Screening Tool (GEST) using five-fold cross-validation on data from 8 EDs. Performance was compared to the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices using area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC), calibration, and decision curve analyses. Reproducibility was tested against data from the remaining independent ED within the health system. We then used GEST to investigate rates of ACP documentation availability and code status orders in the EHR across risk strata. RESULTS A total of 431,179 encounters by 123,128 adults were included in this study with a 6-month mortality rate of 12.2%. Charlson (AUROC (95% CI): 0.65 (0.64-0.69)) and Elixhauser indices (0.69 (0.68-0.70)) were outperformed by GEST (0.82 (0.82-0.83)). GEST displayed robust performance across demographic subgroups and in our independent validation site. Among patients with a greater than 30% mortality risk using GEST, only 5.0% had ACP documentation; 79.0% had a code status previously ordered, of which 70.7% were full code. In decision curve analysis, GEST provided greater net benefit than the Charlson and Elixhauser scores. CONCLUSIONS Prognostic models using EHR data robustly identify high mortality risk older adults in the ED for whom code status, ACP, or palliative care interventions may be of benefit. Although all tested methods identified patients approaching the end-of-life, GEST was most performant. These tools may enable resource-sensitive end-of-life screening in the ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian D Haimovich
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Wenxin Xu
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Andrew Wei
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Mara A Schonberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ula Hwang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, James J. Peters VAMC, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - R Andrew Taylor
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ouchi K, Lee RS, Block SD, Aaronson EL, Hasdianda MA, Wang W, Rossmassler S, Lopez RP, Berry D, Sudore R, Schonberg MA, Tulsky JA. An emergency department nurse led intervention to facilitate serious illness conversations among seriously ill older adults: A feasibility study. Palliat Med 2023; 37:730-739. [PMID: 36380515 PMCID: PMC10183478 DOI: 10.1177/02692163221136641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Serious illness conversations may lead to care consistent with patients' goals near the end of life. The emergency department could serve as an important time and location for these conversations. AIM To determine the feasibility of an emergency department-based, brief motivational interview to stimulate serious illness conversations among seriously ill older adults by trained nurses. DESIGN A pre-/post-intervention study. SETTINGS/PARTICIPANTS In an urban, tertiary care, academic medical center and a community hospital from January 2021 to January 2022, we prospectively enrolled adults ⩾50 years of age with serious illness and an expected prognosis <1 year. We measured feasibility outcomes using the standardized framework for feasibility studies. In addition, we also collected the validated 4-item Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey (a 5-point Likert scale) at baseline and 4-week follow-up and reviewing the electronic medical record for documentation related to newly completed serious illness conversations. RESULTS Among 116 eligible patients who were willing and able to participate, 76 enrolled (65% recruitment rate), and 68 completed the follow-up (91% retention rate). Mean patient age was 64.4 years (SD 8.4), 49% were female, and 58% had metastatic cancer. In all, 16 nurses conducted the intervention, and all participants completed the intervention with a median duration of 27 min. Self-reported Advance Care Planning Engagement increased from 2.78 pre to 3.31 post intervention (readiness to "talk to doctors about end-of-life wishes," p < 0.008). Documentation of health care proxy forms increased (62-70%) as did Medical Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (1-11%) during the 6 months after the emergency department visit. CONCLUSION A novel, emergency department-based, nurse-led brief motivational interview to stimulate serious illness conversations is feasible and may improve advance care planning engagement and documentation in seriously ill older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kei Ouchi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Serious Illness Care Program, Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rachel S. Lee
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Susan D. Block
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emily L. Aaronson
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mohammad A. Hasdianda
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Wei Wang
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Circadian and Sleep Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah Rossmassler
- Department of Nursing, MGH Institute on Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Care, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA, USA
| | - Ruth Palan Lopez
- Department of Nursing, MGH Institute on Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Donna Berry
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Rebecca Sudore
- Division of Geriatrics Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mara A. Schonberg
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - James A. Tulsky
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Impact of Geriatric Admissions on Workload in the Emergency Department. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11040593. [PMID: 36833127 PMCID: PMC9957037 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11040593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2023] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Due to the increase in life expectancy, both the general population and the population of patients of emergency departments (ED) are getting older. An understanding of differences, workload and resource requirements may be helpful in improving patient care. The main goal of this study was to evaluate the reasons for geriatric admissions in the ED, identify typical medical problems and assess the number of resources in order to provide more effective management. Methods: We examined 35,720 elderly patients' ED visits over the course of 3 years. The data collected included age, sex, timing and length of stay (LOS), use of various resources, endpoint (admission, discharge or death) and ICD-10 diagnoses. Results: The median age was 73 years [66-81], with more females (54.86%). There were 57.66% elderly (G1), 36.44% senile (G2) and 5.89% long-liver (G3) patients. There were more females in the older groups. The total admission rate was 37.89% (34.19% for G1, 42.21% for G2 and 47.33% for G3). The average length of the patient's stay was 150 min [81-245] (G3 180 min [108-277], G2 (162 min [92-261]) and G1 139 min [71-230]). Heart failure, atrial fibrillation and hip fracture were the most common diagnoses. Nonspecific diagnoses were common in all groups. Conclusion: The vast majority of geriatric patients required considerable resources. With increasing ages, the number of women, LOS and number of admissions increased.
Collapse
|
9
|
Prachanukool T, Block SD, Berry D, Lee RS, Rossmassler S, Hasdianda MA, Wang W, Sudore R, Schonberg MA, Tulsky JA, Ouchi K. Emergency department-based, nurse-initiated, serious illness conversation intervention for older adults: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2022; 23:866. [PMID: 36210436 PMCID: PMC9549655 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06797-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Visits to the emergency department (ED) are inflection points in patients' illness trajectories and are an underutilized setting to engage seriously ill patients in conversations about their goals of care. We developed an intervention (ED GOAL) that primes seriously ill patients to discuss their goals of care with their outpatient clinicians after leaving the ED. The aims of this study are (i) to test the impact of ED GOAL administered by trained nurses on self-reported, advance care planning (ACP) engagement after leaving the ED and (ii) to evaluate whether ED GOAL increases self-reported completion of serious illness conversation and other patient-centered outcomes. METHODS This is a two-armed, parallel-design, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial of 120 seriously ill older adults in two academic and one community EDs in Boston, MA. Participants are English-speaking adults 50 years and older with a serious life-limiting illness with a recent ED visit. Patients with a valid MOLST (medical order for life-sustaining treatment) form or other documented goals of care within the last 3 months are excluded. We enroll the caregivers of patients with cognitive impairment. Patients are assigned to the intervention or control group using block randomization. A blinded research team member will perform outcome assessments. We will assess (i) changes in ACP engagement within 6 months and (ii) qualitative assessments of the effect of ED GOAL. DISCUSSION In seriously ill older adults arriving in the ED, this randomized controlled trial will test the effects of ED GOAL on patients' self-reported ACP engagement, EMR documentation of new serious illness conversations, and improving patient-centered outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05209880.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thidathit Prachanukool
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
| | - Susan D Block
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Donna Berry
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Rachel S Lee
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah Rossmassler
- Department of Nursing, MGH Institute on Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Care, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA, USA
| | - Mohammad A Hasdianda
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Wei Wang
- Division of Circadian and Sleep Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rebecca Sudore
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mara A Schonberg
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - James A Tulsky
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kei Ouchi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Aaronson EL, Wright RJ, Ritchie CS, Grudzen CR, Ankuda CK, Bowman JK, Kuntz JG, Ouchi K, George N, Jubanyik K, Bright LE, Bickel K, Isaacs E, Petrillo LA, Carpenter C, Goett R, LaPointe L, Owens D, Manfredi R, Quest T. Mapping the future for research in emergency medicine palliative care: A research roadmap. Acad Emerg Med 2022; 29:963-973. [PMID: 35368129 PMCID: PMC11298868 DOI: 10.1111/acem.14496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The intersection of emergency medicine (EM) and palliative care (PC) has been recognized as an essential area of focus, with evidence suggesting that increased integration improves outcomes. This has resulted in increased research in EM PC. No current framework exists to help guide investigation and innovation. OBJECTIVE The objective was to convene a working group to develop a roadmap that would help provide focus and prioritization for future research. METHODS Participants were identified based on clinical, operation, policy, and research expertise in both EM and PC and spanned physician, nursing, social work, and patient perspectives. The research roadmap setting process consisted of three distinct phases that were time staggered over 12 months and facilitated through three live video convenings, asynchronous input via an online document, and a series of smaller video convenings of work groups focused on specific topics. RESULTS Gaps in the literature were identified and informed the four key areas for future research. Consensus was reached on these domains and the associated research questions in each domain to help guide future study. The key domains included work focused on the value imperative for PC in the emergency setting, models of care delivery, disparities, and measurement of impact and efficacy. Additionally, the group identified key methodological considerations for doing work at the intersection of EM and PC. CONCLUSIONS There are several key domains and associated questions that can help guide future research in ED PC. Focus on these areas, and answering these questions, offers the potential to improve the emergency care of patients with PC needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily L. Aaronson
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Christine S. Ritchie
- Division of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Mongan Institute Center for Aging and Serious Illness, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Corita R. Grudzen
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health/Bellevue Hospital Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Claire K. Ankuda
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jason K. Bowman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joanne G. Kuntz
- Department of Palliative and Supportive Care, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Kei Ouchi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Naomi George
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Division of Adult Critical Care, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Karen Jubanyik
- Emergency Department, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Leah E. Bright
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kathleen Bickel
- Hospice and Palliative Medicine in the Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Eric Isaacs
- Emergency Department, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Laura A. Petrillo
- Division of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Christopher Carpenter
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - Rebecca Goett
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - Lauren LaPointe
- Department of Social Work, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Darrell Owens
- University of Washington Medical Center, UW School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Rita Manfredi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Tammie Quest
- Department of Palliative and Supportive Care, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bielinska AM, Archer S, Darzi A, Urch C. Co-designing an intervention to increase uptake of advance care planning in later life following emergency hospitalisation: a research protocol using accelerated experience-based co-design (AEBCD) and the behaviour change wheel (BCW). BMJ Open 2022; 12:e055347. [PMID: 35589349 PMCID: PMC9121419 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite the potential benefits of advance care planning, uptake in older adults is low. In general, there is a lack of guidance as to how to initiate advance care planning conversations and encourage individuals to take action in planning their future care, including after emergency hospitalisation. Participatory action research methods are harnessed in health services research to design interventions that are relevant to end-users and stakeholders. This study aims to involve older persons, carers and healthcare professionals in co-designing an intervention to increase uptake of advance care planning in later life, which can be used by social contacts and healthcare professionals, particularly in the context of a recent emergency hospitalisation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The theory-driven participatory design research method integrates and adapts accelerated experience-based co-design with the behaviour change wheel, in the form of a collaborative multi-stakeholder co-design workshop. In total, 12 participants, comprising 4 lay persons aged 70+, 4 carers and 4 healthcare professionals with experience in elder care, will be recruited to participate in two online half-day sessions, together comprising one online workshop. There will be a maximum of two workshops. First, in the discovery phase, participants will reflect on findings from earlier qualitative research on views and experiences of advance care planning from three workstreams: patients, carers and healthcare professionals. Second, in the co-design phase, participants will explore practical mechanisms in which older persons aged 70+ can be encouraged to adopt advance care planning behaviours based on the behaviour change wheel, in order to co-design a behavioural intervention to increase uptake of advance care planning in older adults after an emergency hospitalisation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval has been obtained from the Science Engineering Technology Research Ethics Committee at Imperial College London (Reference: 19IC5538). The findings from this study will be disseminated through publications, conferences and meetings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna-Maria Bielinska
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Surgery, Cancer and Cardiovascular, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Stephanie Archer
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care and Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ara Darzi
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Surgery, Cancer and Cardiovascular, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Catherine Urch
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Surgery, Cancer and Cardiovascular, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Schoppee TM, Scarton L, Bluck S, Yao Y, Keenan G, Samuels V, Fitchett G, Handzo G, Chochinov HM, Emanuel LL, Wilkie DJ. Dignity therapy intervention fidelity: a cross-sectional descriptive study with older adult outpatients with cancer. BMC Palliat Care 2022; 21:8. [PMID: 35016670 PMCID: PMC8751346 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-021-00888-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Intervention fidelity is imperative to ensure confidence in study results and intervention replication in research and clinical settings. Like many brief protocol psychotherapies, Dignity Therapy lacks sufficient evidence of intervention fidelity. To overcome this gap, our study purpose was to examine intervention fidelity among therapists trained with a systematized training protocol. Methods For preliminary fidelity evaluation in a large multi-site stepped wedge randomized controlled trial, we analyzed 46 early transcripts of interviews from 10 therapists (7 female; 7 White, 3 Black). Each transcript was evaluated with the Revised Dignity Therapy Adherence Checklist for consistency with the Dignity Therapy protocol in terms of its Process (15 dichotomous items) and Core Principles (6 Likert-type items). A second rater independently coded 26% of the transcripts to assess interrater reliability. Results Each therapist conducted 2 to 10 interviews. For the 46 scored transcripts, the mean Process score was 12.4/15 (SD = 1.2), and the mean Core Principles score was 9.9/12 (SD = 1.8) with 70% of the transcripts at or above the 80% fidelity criterion. Interrater reliability (Cohen’s kappa and weighted kappa) for all Adherence Checklist items ranged between .75 and 1.0. For the Core Principles items, Cronbach’s alpha was .92. Conclusions Preliminary findings indicate that fidelity to Dignity Therapy delivery was acceptable for most transcripts and provide insights for improving consistency of intervention delivery. The systematized training protocol and ongoing monitoring with the fidelity audit tool will facilitate consistent intervention delivery and add to the literature about fidelity monitoring for brief protocol psychotherapeutic interventions. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-021-00888-y.
Collapse
|
13
|
The Substance Use Treatment and Recovery Team (START) study: protocol for a multi-site randomized controlled trial evaluating an intervention to improve initiation of medication and linkage to post-discharge care for hospitalized patients with opioid use disorder. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2022; 17:39. [PMID: 35902888 PMCID: PMC9331017 DOI: 10.1186/s13722-022-00320-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with opioid use disorder experience high burden of disease from medical comorbidities and are increasingly hospitalized with medical complications. Medications for opioid use disorder are an effective, life-saving treatment, but patients with an opioid use disorder admitted to the hospital seldom initiate medication for their disorder while in the hospital, nor are they linked with outpatient treatment after discharge. The inpatient stay, when patients may be more receptive to improving their health and reducing substance use, offers an opportunity to discuss opioid use disorder and facilitate medication initiation and linkage to treatment after discharge. An addiction-focus consultative team that uses evidence-based tools and resources could address barriers, such as the need for the primary medical team to focus on the primary health problem and lack of time and expertise, that prevent primary medical teams from addressing substance use. METHODS This study is a pragmatic randomized controlled trial that will evaluate whether a consultative team, called the Substance Use Treatment and Recovery Team (START), increases initiation of any US Food and Drug Administration approved medication for opioid use disorder (buprenorphine, methadone, naltrexone) during the hospital stay and increases linkage to treatment after discharge compared to patients receiving usual care. The study is being conducted at three geographically distinct academic hospitals. Patients are randomly assigned within each hospital to receive the START intervention or usual care. Primary study outcomes are initiation of medication for opioid use disorder in the hospital and linkage to medication or other opioid use disorder treatment after discharge. Outcomes are assessed through participant interviews at baseline and 1 month after discharge and data from hospital and outpatient medical records. DISCUSSION The START intervention offers a compelling model to improve care for hospitalized patients with opioid use disorder. The study could also advance translational science by identifying an effective and generalizable approach to treating not only opioid use disorder, but also other substance use disorders and behavioral health conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05086796, Registered on 10/21/2021. https://www. CLINICALTRIALS gov/ct2/results?recrs=ab&cond=&term=NCT05086796&cntry=&state=&city=&dist = .
Collapse
|
14
|
Hughes K, Achauer S, Baker EF, Knowles HC, Clayborne EP, Goett RR, Moussa M. Addressing end-of-life care in the chronically ill: Conversations in the emergency department. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open 2021; 2:e12569. [PMID: 34632450 PMCID: PMC8486416 DOI: 10.1002/emp2.12569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Revised: 09/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients present to the emergency department in various stages of chronic illness. Advance directives (ADs) aid emergency physicians in making treatment decisions, but only a minority of Americans have completed an AD, and the percentage of those who have discussed their end-of-life wishes may be even lower. This article addresses the use of common ADs and roadblocks to their use from the perspectives of families, patients, and physicians. Cases to examine new approaches to optimizing end-of-life conversations in patients who are chronically ill, such as the Improving Palliative Care in Emergency Medicine Project, a decision-making framework that opens discussion for patients to gain understanding and determine preferences, and the Brief Negotiated Interview, a 7-minute, scripted, motivational interview that determines willingness for behavior change and initiates care planning, are used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarina Hughes
- University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life SciencesToledoOhioUSA
| | - Samantha Achauer
- University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life SciencesToledoOhioUSA
| | | | | | - Elizabeth P. Clayborne
- Department of Emergency MedicineUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | | | - Mohamad Moussa
- Emergency MedicineUniversity of Toledo College of Medicine and Life SciencesToledoOhioUSA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hasdianda MA, Gray TF, Bello JL, Ballaron B, Egorova NA, Berry DL, Ouchi K. Nurses' Perceptions of Facilitating Advance Care Planning Conversations in the Emergency Department. Palliat Med Rep 2021; 2:65-70. [PMID: 34223506 PMCID: PMC8241390 DOI: 10.1089/pmr.2020.0116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Nurses are well positioned to initiate advance care planning (ACP) conversations because of their unique strength in communication and central patient-facing role in the interdisciplinary team. Nurse-led ACP conversations have demonstrated promising results in settings outside of the emergency department (ED). Understanding ED nurses' perspectives regarding ACP conversations is needed before implementing similar practices in the ED. Objective: To explore ED nurses' perception of facilitating ACP conversations. Design: We conducted a cross-sectional survey to assess ED nurses' perceptions of facilitating ACP conversations in the ED. Setting: ED nurses at one academic hospital and one community hospital located within the northeastern region of the United States. Results: Seventy-seven (53.1%) out of 145 eligible ED nurses completed the survey. All participants perceived ACP conversations in the ED as at least somewhat important. Forty (51.9%) felt somewhat comfortable in facilitating these conversations. The majority of participants (77.9%) agreed that a specially trained nurse consultation model might be helpful in the ED. We found a correlation between total clinical experience and interest in facilitating ACP conversations in the ED (p = 0.045). Conclusion: ED nurses are well positioned to help patients clarify their goals-of-care and end-of-life care preferences. They perceived ACP conversations to be important and felt comfortable to facilitate them in the ED. Additional studies are needed to empirically test its implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Adrian Hasdianda
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tamryn F Gray
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Josephine Lo Bello
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Brittany Ballaron
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Natasha A Egorova
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Donna L Berry
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kei Ouchi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Serious Illness Care Program, Ariadne Labs, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Managing Code Status Conversations for Seriously Ill Older Adults in Respiratory Failure. Ann Emerg Med 2020; 76:751-756. [PMID: 32747084 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.05.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
17
|
Pajka SE, Hasdianda MA, George N, Sudore R, Schonberg MA, Bernstein E, Tulsky JA, Block SD, Ouchi K. Feasibility of a Brief Intervention to Facilitate Advance Care Planning Conversations for Patients with Life-Limiting Illness in the Emergency Department. J Palliat Med 2020; 24:31-39. [PMID: 32471321 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Advance care planning (ACP) conversations are an important intervention to provide care consistent with patient goals near the end of life. The emergency department (ED) could serve as an important time and location for these conversations. Objectives: To determine the feasibility of an ED-based, brief negotiated interview (BNI) to stimulate ACP conversations among seriously ill older adults. Methods: We conducted a pre/postintervention study in the ED of an urban, tertiary care, academic medical center. From November 2017 to May 2019, we prospectively enrolled adults ≥65 years of age with serious illness. Trained clinicians conducted the intervention. We measured patients' ACP engagement at baseline and follow-up (3 ± 1 weeks) and reviewed electronic medical record documentation of ACP (e.g., medical order for life-sustaining treatment [MOLST]). Results: We enrolled 51 patients (mean age = 71; SD 12), 41% were female, and 51% of patients had metastatic cancer. Median duration of the intervention was 11.8 minutes; few (6%) of the interventions were interrupted. We completed follow-up for 61% of participants. Patients' self-reported ACP engagement increased from 3.0 to 3.7 out of 5 after the intervention (p < 0.01). Electronic documentation of health care proxy forms increased (75%-94%, n = 48) as did MOLST (0%-19%, n = 48) during the six months after the ED visit. Conclusion: A novel, ED-based, BNI intervention to stimulate ACP conversations for seriously ill older adults is feasible and may improve ACP engagement and documentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Pajka
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mohammad Adrian Hasdianda
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Naomi George
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Center for Adult Critical Care, University of New Mexico, School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Rebecca Sudore
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Mara A Schonberg
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Edward Bernstein
- The Brief Negotiated Interview Active Referral to Treatment Institute, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - James A Tulsky
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Susan D Block
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Serious Illness Care Program, Ariadne Labs, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kei Ouchi
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Serious Illness Care Program, Ariadne Labs, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lin CP, Evans CJ, Koffman J, Sheu SJ, Hsu SH, Harding R. What influences patients' decisions regarding palliative care in advance care planning discussions? Perspectives from a qualitative study conducted with advanced cancer patients, families and healthcare professionals. Palliat Med 2019; 33:1299-1309. [PMID: 31368854 DOI: 10.1177/0269216319866641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The concept of advance care planning is largely derived from Western countries. However, the decision-making process and drivers for choosing palliative care in non-Western cultures have received little attention. AIM To explore the decision-making processes and drivers of receiving palliative care in advance care planning discussions from perspectives of advanced cancer patients, families and healthcare professionals in northern Taiwan. METHOD Semi-structured qualitative interviews with advanced cancer patients, their families and healthcare professionals independently from inpatient oncology and hospice units. Thematic analysis with analytical rigour enhanced by dual coding and exploration of divergent views. RESULTS Forty-five participants were interviewed (n = 15 from each group). Three main decision-making trajectories were identified: (1) 'choose palliative care' was associated with patients' desire to reduce physical suffering from treatments, avoid being a burden to families and society, reduce futile treatments and donate organs to help others; (2) 'decline palliative care' was associated with patients weighing up perceived benefits to others as more important than benefits for themselves; and (3) 'no opportunity to choose palliative care' was associated with lack of opportunities to discuss potential benefits of palliative care, lack of staff skill in end-of-life communication, and cultural factors, notably filial piety. CONCLUSION Choice for palliative care among advanced cancer patients in Taiwan is influenced by three decision-making trajectories. Opinions from families are highly influential, and patients often lack information on palliative care options. Strategies to facilitate decision-making require staff confidence in end-of-life discussions, working with the patients and their family while respecting the influence of filial piety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng-Pei Lin
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Catherine J Evans
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.,Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Jonathan Koffman
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Shuh-Jen Sheu
- Institution of Community Health Care, School of Nursing, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Su-Hsuan Hsu
- Centre of Long-term Care Planning and Development, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Richard Harding
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zeng H, Eugene P, Supino M. Would You Be Surprised if This Patient Died in the Next 12 Months? Using the Surprise Question to Increase Palliative Care Consults From the Emergency Department. J Palliat Care 2019; 35:221-225. [PMID: 31394970 DOI: 10.1177/0825859719866698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a growing movement to increase palliative care consults from the emergency department (ED) to reduce healthcare costs and improve quality of life. The surprise question is a screening tool that emergency medicine physicians may be able to use towards achieving this goal. OBJECTIVE The objectives of this study were to increase awareness of hospice and palliative care medicine (HPM) among emergency medicine (EM) providers and to evaluate whether this heightened awareness increased palliative care consults among participating emergency medicine providers. METHODS We conducted an anonymous convenience sample survey and two educational interventions about HPM including the surprise question among emergency medicine resident and attending physicians at a large urban public academic quaternary care center from July to November 2018. A report of palliative care consults ordered between August 1, 2017 and January 1, 2019 was generated from the electronic health records used by the hospital. The number of palliative care consults made before and after the educational intervention was compared. RESULTS After the first educational intervention centered on the surprise question, palliative care consults from the ED increased from an average of 2.25 per month (range 0 to 8, SD: 2.38) to 12.67 per month (range 9 to 19, SD: 4.01, p < .001). CONCLUSION Educating EM physicians about the surprise question can increase the number of palliative care consults from the ED, thereby potentially improving patient care and decreasing costs by avoiding unwanted healthcare interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Zeng
- Department of Emergency Medicine, 23214Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Paul Eugene
- Department of Emergency Medicine, 23214Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Mark Supino
- Department of Emergency Medicine, 23214Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ouchi K, George N, Schuur JD, Aaronson EL, Lindvall C, Bernstein E, Sudore RL, Schonberg MA, Block SD, Tulsky JA. Goals-of-Care Conversations for Older Adults With Serious Illness in the Emergency Department: Challenges and Opportunities. Ann Emerg Med 2019; 74:276-284. [PMID: 30770207 PMCID: PMC6714052 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2018] [Revised: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 12/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
During the last 6 months of life, 75% of older adults with preexisting serious illness, such as advanced heart failure, lung disease, and cancer, visit the emergency department (ED). ED visits often mark an inflection point in these patients' illness trajectories, signaling a more rapid rate of decline. Although most patients are there seeking care for acute issues, many of them have priorities other than to simply live as long as possible; yet without discussion of preferences for treatment, they are at risk of receiving care not aligned with their goals. An ED visit may offer a unique "teachable moment" to empower patients to consider their ability to influence future medical care decisions. However, the constraints of the ED setting pose specific challenges, and little research exists to guide clinicians treating patients in this setting. We describe the current state of goals-of-care conversations in the ED, outline the challenges to conducting these conversations, and recommend a research agenda to better equip emergency physicians to guide shared decisionmaking for end-of-life care. Applying best practices for serious illness communication may help emergency physicians empower such patients to align their future medical care with their values and goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kei Ouchi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Serious Illness Care Program, Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA; Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
| | - Naomi George
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jeremiah D Schuur
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Emily L Aaronson
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Charlotta Lindvall
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Edward Bernstein
- The Brief Negotiated Interview Active Referral to Treatment Institute, Boston University School of Public Health, and the Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Rebecca L Sudore
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Mara A Schonberg
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Susan D Block
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Serious Illness Care Program, Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA; Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - James A Tulsky
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|