1
|
Walling AM, Cassel JB, Kerr K, Wenger NS, Garcia-Jimenez M, Meyers K, Zingmond D. Limitations with California Medicaid Data for Palliative and End of Life Care Quality Measures. J Pain Symptom Manage 2024:S0885-3924(24)00904-7. [PMID: 39084412 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.07.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
In 2014 the California legislature passed Senate Bill 1004 (SB 1004) that was designed to expand access to specialty palliative care for individuals served by California's Medicaid (known as Medi-Cal) Managed Care Plans (MCPs). The California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) operationalized the legislation by developing minimum requirements for palliative care programs that all MCPs must meet or exceed7. Quality and utilization data specific to California's Medicaid population are needed for stakeholders to identify care deficiencies and disparities, describe the end of life experience and utilization patterns of MCP members, compare these patterns to Medicare beneficiaries or other populations, and set appropriate targets to help monitor progress. We evaluated the feasibility of using Medicaid claims data and encounter data either by partnering with MCPs or by obtaining statewide data from DHCS to measure the quality of palliative care and end of life care. In a concurrent but separate effort, we analyzed administrative data supplied by three MCPs as part of a prospective pilot of standards for home-based palliative care in California, including care delivered to Medicaid beneficiaries under SB 1004. Beyond the practical challenges of allowing time for data access and approvals, both projects revealed several limitations to using administrative data to assess quality of palliative and end of life care for a Medicaid population. We describe these challenges that undermined our confidence in analysis results and propose solutions to measuring the quality of palliative and end of life care for Medicaid patients and suggested next steps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne M Walling
- Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles; VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California.
| | - J Brian Cassel
- Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA
| | | | - Neil S Wenger
- Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Maria Garcia-Jimenez
- Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Olive View-UCLA, Los Angeles
| | | | - David Zingmond
- Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sullivan DR, Jones KF, Wachterman MW, Griffin HL, Kinder D, Smith D, Thorpe J, Feder SL, Ersek M, Kutney-Lee A. TEMPORARY REMOVAL: Opportunities to Improve End-of-Life Care Quality among Patients with Short Terminal Admissions. J Pain Symptom Manage 2024:S0885-3924(24)00789-9. [PMID: 38810950 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Revised: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
The Publisher regrets that this article has been temporarily removed. A replacement will appear as soon as possible in which the reason for the removal of the article will be specified, or the article will be reinstated. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald R Sullivan
- Department of Medicine (D.R.S.), Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland Oregon, USA; Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (D.R.S.), Portland Veteran Affairs Healthcare System, Portland Oregon, USA.
| | - Katie F Jones
- New England Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (K.F.J.), Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Medicine (K.F.J.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Melissa W Wachterman
- Section of General Internal Medicine (M.W.), Veterans Affairs Boston Health Care System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine (M.W.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston MA, USA; Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care (M.W.), Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hilary L Griffin
- Veteran Experience Center (H.G., D.K., D.G., M.E., A.K.L.), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Daniel Kinder
- Veteran Experience Center (H.G., D.K., D.G., M.E., A.K.L.), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Dawn Smith
- Veteran Experience Center (H.G., D.K., D.G., M.E., A.K.L.), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Joshua Thorpe
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (J.M.T.), Pittsburgh VA Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; University of North Carolina School of Pharmacy (J.M.T.), Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Shelli L Feder
- Yale University School of Nursing (S.L.F.), Orange, Connecticut, USA; West Haven Department of Veterans Affairs (S.L.F.), West Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Mary Ersek
- Veteran Experience Center (H.G., D.K., D.G., M.E., A.K.L.), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Leonard Davis Institute (M.E.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ann Kutney-Lee
- Veteran Experience Center (H.G., D.K., D.G., M.E., A.K.L.), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Center for Health Equity and Research Promotion (A.K.L.), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; University of Pennsylvania (A.K.L.), School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Giannitrapani KF, McCaa MD, Maheta BJ, Raspi IG, Shreve ST, Lorenz KA. Serious illness care quality during COVID-19: Identifying improvement opportunities in narrative reports from a National Bereaved Family Survey. Palliat Med 2023; 37:1025-1033. [PMID: 37198879 PMCID: PMC10195683 DOI: 10.1177/02692163231175693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 significantly impacted care delivery to seriously ill patients, especially around including family and caregivers in patient care. AIM Based on routinely collected bereaved family reports, actionable practices were identified to maintain and improve care in the last month of life, with potential application to all seriously ill patients. DESIGN The Veterans Health Administration's Bereaved Family Survey is used nationally to gather routine feedback from families and caregivers of recent in-patient decedents; the survey includes multiple structured items as well as space for open narrative responses. The responses were analyzed using qualitative content analysis with dual review. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Between February 2020 and March 2021, there were 5372 responses to the free response questions of which 1000 (18.6%) responses were randomly selected. The 445 (44.5%) responses from 377 unique individuals included actionable practices. RESULTS Bereaved family members and caregivers identified four opportunities with a total of 32 actionable practices. Opportunity 1: Facilitate the use of video communication, included four actionable practices. Opportunity 2: Provide timely and accurate responses to family concerns, included 17 actionable practices. Opportunity 3: Accommodate family/caregiver visitation, included eight actionable practices. Opportunity 4: Offer physical presence to the patient when family/caregivers are unable to visit, included three actionable practices. CONCLUSION The findings from this quality improvement project are applicable during a pandemic, but also translate to improving the care of seriously ill patients in other circumstances, such as when family members or caregivers are geographically distant from a loved one during the last weeks of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karleen F Giannitrapani
- VA Quality Improvement Resource Center for Palliative Care, Menlo Park, CA, USA
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Matthew D McCaa
- VA Quality Improvement Resource Center for Palliative Care, Menlo Park, CA, USA
| | - Bhagvat J Maheta
- VA Quality Improvement Resource Center for Palliative Care, Menlo Park, CA, USA
- California Northstate University College of Medicine, Elk Grove, CA, USA
| | - Isabella G Raspi
- VA Quality Improvement Resource Center for Palliative Care, Menlo Park, CA, USA
- The College of Arts and Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Scott T Shreve
- United States Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Palliative Care, Lebanon, PA, USA
| | - Karl A Lorenz
- VA Quality Improvement Resource Center for Palliative Care, Menlo Park, CA, USA
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Haverfield MC, Garcia A, Giannitrapani KF, Walling A, Rigdon J, Bekelman DB, Lo N, Lehmann LS, Jacobs J, Festa N, Lorenz KA. Goals of Care Documentation: Insights from A Pilot Implementation Study. J Pain Symptom Manage 2022; 63:485-494. [PMID: 34952172 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.12.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 12/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The Life Sustaining Treatment Decision Initiative is a national effort by the Veterans Health Administration to ensure goals of care documentation occurs among all patients at high risk of life-threatening events. OBJECTIVES Examine likelihood to receive goals of care documentation and explore associations between documentation and perceived patient care experience at the individual and site level. METHODS Retrospective, quality improvement analysis of initiative pilot data from four geographically diverse Veterans Affairs (VA) sites (Fall 2014-Winter 2016) before national roll-out. Goals of care documentation according to gender, marital status, urban/rural status, race/ethnicity, age, serious health condition, and Care Assessment Needs scores. Association between goals of care documentation and perceived patient care experience analyzed based on Bereaved Family Survey outcomes of overall care, communication, and support. RESULTS Veterans were more likely to have goals of care documentation if widowed, urban residents, and of white race. Patients older than 65-years and those with a higher Care Assessment Needs score were twice as likely as a frail patient to have goals of care documented. One pilot site demonstrated a positive association between documentation and perceived support. Pilot site was a statistically significant predictor of the occurrence of goals of care documentation and Bereaved Family Survey scores. CONCLUSION Older and seriously ill patients were most likely to have goals of care documented. Association between a documented goals of care conversation and perceived patient care experience were largely unsupported. Site-level largely contributed to understanding the likelihood of documentation and care experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie C Haverfield
- VA Palo Alto, Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), Menlo Park, California, USA; Department of Communication Studies, San José State University, San Jose, California, USA.
| | - Ariadna Garcia
- VA Palo Alto, Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), Menlo Park, California, USA; School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Karleen F Giannitrapani
- VA Palo Alto, Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), Menlo Park, California, USA; School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Anne Walling
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Joseph Rigdon
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - David B Bekelman
- Department of Medicine, Department of Veterans Affairs, Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Natalie Lo
- VA Palo Alto, Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), Menlo Park, California, USA
| | - Lisa S Lehmann
- Veterans Affairs New England Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Josephine Jacobs
- VA Palo Alto, Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), Menlo Park, California, USA
| | - Natalia Festa
- Yale New Haven Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatrics, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Karl A Lorenz
- VA Palo Alto, Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), Menlo Park, California, USA; School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kutney-Lee A, Bellamy SL, Ersek M, Medvedeva EL, Smith D, Thorpe JM, Brooks Carthon JM. Care processes and racial/ethnic differences in family reports of end-of-life care among Veterans: A mediation analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc 2022; 70:1095-1105. [PMID: 34985133 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bereaved family members of racial/ethnic minority Veterans are less likely than families of White Veterans to provide favorable overall ratings of end-of-life (EOL) care quality; however, the underlying mechanisms for these differences have not been explored. The objective of this study was to examine whether a set of EOL care process measures mediated the association between Veteran race/ethnicity and bereaved families' overall rating of the quality of EOL care in VA medical centers (VAMCs). METHODS A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of linked Bereaved Family Survey (BFS), administrative and clinical data was conducted. The sample included 17,911 Veterans (mean age: 73.7; SD: 11.6) who died on an acute or intensive care unit across 121 VAMCs between October 2010 and September 2015. Mediation analyses were used to assess whether five care processes (potentially burdensome transitions, high-intensity EOL treatment, and the BFS factors of Care and Communication, Emotional and Spiritual Support, and Death Benefits) significantly affected the association between Veteran race/ethnicity and a poor/fair BFS overall rating. RESULTS Potentially burdensome transitions, high-intensity EOL treatment, and the three BFS factors of Care and Communication, Emotional and Spiritual Support, and Death Benefits did not substantially mediate the relationship between Veteran race/ethnicity and poor/fair overall ratings of quality of EOL care by bereaved family members. CONCLUSIONS The reasons underlying poorer ratings of quality of EOL care among bereaved family members of racial/ethnic minority Veterans remain largely unexplained. More research on identifying potential mechanisms, including experiences of racism, and the unique EOL care needs of racial and ethnic minority Veterans and their families is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann Kutney-Lee
- Veteran Experience Center, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Scarlett L Bellamy
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mary Ersek
- Veteran Experience Center, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Elina L Medvedeva
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Dawn Smith
- Veteran Experience Center, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Joshua M Thorpe
- Veteran Experience Center, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - J Margo Brooks Carthon
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yefimova M, Aslakson RA, Yang L, Garcia A, Boothroyd D, Gale RC, Giannitrapani K, Morris AM, Johanning JM, Shreve S, Wachterman MW, Lorenz KA. Palliative Care and End-of-Life Outcomes Following High-risk Surgery. JAMA Surg 2020; 155:138-146. [PMID: 31895424 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.5083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Importance Palliative care has the potential to improve care for patients and families undergoing high-risk surgery. Objective To characterize the use of perioperative palliative care and its association with family-reported end-of-life experiences of patients who died within 90 days of a high-risk surgical operation. Design, Setting, and Participants This secondary analysis of administrative data from a retrospective cross-sectional patient cohort was conducted in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System. Patients who underwent any of 227 high-risk operations between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2015, were included. Exposures Palliative-care consultation within 30 days before or 90 days after surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures The outcomes were family-reported ratings of overall care, communication, and support in the patient's last month of life. The VA surveyed all families of inpatient decedents using the Bereaved Family Survey, a valid and reliable tool that measures patient and family-centered end-of-life outcomes. Results A total of 95 204 patients underwent high-risk operations in 129 inpatient VA Medical Centers. Most patients were 65 years or older (69 278 [72.8%]), and the most common procedures were cardiothoracic (31 157 [32.7%]) or vascular (23 517 [24.7%]). The 90-day mortality rate was 6.0% (5740 patients) and varied by surgical subspecialty (ranging from 278 of 7226 [3.8%] in urologic surgery to 875 of 6223 patients [14.1%] in neurosurgery). A multivariate mixed model revealed that families of decedents who received palliative care were 47% more likely to rate overall care in the last month of life as excellent than those who did not (odds ratio [OR], 1.47 [95% CI, 1.14-1.88]; P = .007), after adjusting for patient's characteristics, surgical subspecialty of the high-risk operation, and survey nonresponse. Similarly, families of decedents who received palliative care were more likely to rate end-of-life communication (OR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.09-1.87]; P = .004) and support (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.01-1.71]; P = .05) components of medical care as excellent. Of the entire cohort, 3374 patients (3.75%) had a palliative care consultation, and 770 patients (0.8%) received it before surgery. Of all decedents, 1632 (29.9%) had a palliative care consultation, with 319 (5.6%) receiving it before surgery. Conclusions and Relevance Receipt of a palliative consultation was associated with better ratings of overall end-of-life care, communication, and support, as reported by families of patients who died within 90 days of high-risk surgery. Yet only one-third of decedents was exposed to palliative care. Expanding integration of perioperative palliative care may benefit patients undergoing high-risk operations and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Yefimova
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California.,Office of Research, Patient Care Services, Stanford Healthcare, Stanford, California
| | - Rebecca A Aslakson
- Section of Palliative Care, Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.,Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Lingyao Yang
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Ariadna Garcia
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Derek Boothroyd
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Randall C Gale
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California
| | - Karleen Giannitrapani
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California.,Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Arden M Morris
- Stanford-Surgery Policy, Improvement Research and Education Center, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Jason M Johanning
- Department of Surgery, Quality and Compliance, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha.,Veterans Integrated Service Network 23, Nebraska-Western Iowa VA Medical Center, Omaha
| | - Scott Shreve
- Hospice and Palliative Care Program, Hospice and Palliative Care Unit Department of Veteran Affairs, Lebanon VA Medical Center, Lebanon, Pennsylvania
| | - Melissa W Wachterman
- Section of General Internal Medicine, VA Boston Health Care System, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Karl A Lorenz
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California.,Section of Palliative Care, Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
McMahan RD, Tellez I, Sudore RL. Deconstructing the Complexities of Advance Care Planning Outcomes: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? A Scoping Review. J Am Geriatr Soc 2020; 69:234-244. [PMID: 32894787 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 224] [Impact Index Per Article: 56.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Advance care planning (ACP) has shown benefit in some, but not all, studies. It is important to understand the utility of ACP. We conducted a scoping review to identify promising interventions and outcomes. DESIGN Scoping review. MEASUREMENTS We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science for ACP randomized controlled trials from January 1, 2010, to March 3, 2020. We used standardized Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses methods to chart study characteristics, including a standardized ACP Outcome Framework: Process (e.g., readiness), Action (e.g., communication), Quality of Care (e.g., satisfaction), Health Status (e.g., anxiety), and Healthcare Utilization. Differences between arms of P < .05 were deemed positive. RESULTS Of 1,464 articles, 69 met eligibility; 94% were rated high quality. There were variable definitions, age criteria (≥18 to ≥80 years), diseases (e.g., dementia and cancer), and settings (e.g., outpatient and inpatient). Interventions included facilitated discussions (42%), video only (20%), interactive, multimedia (17%), written only (12%), and clinician training (9%). For written only, 75% of primary outcomes were positive, as were 69% for multimedia programs; 67% for facilitated discussions, 59% for video only, and 57% for clinician training. Overall, 72% of Process and 86% of Action outcomes were positive. For Quality of Care, 88% of outcomes were positive for patient-surrogate/clinician congruence, 100% for patients/surrogate/clinician satisfaction with communication, and 75% for surrogate satisfaction with patients' care, but not for goal concordance. For Health Status outcomes, 100% were positive for reducing surrogate/clinician distress, but not for patient quality of life. Healthcare Utilization data were mixed. CONCLUSION ACP is complex, and trial characteristics were heterogeneous. Outcomes for all ACP interventions were predominantly positive, as were Process and Action outcomes. Although some Quality of Care and Health Status outcomes were mixed, increased patient/surrogate satisfaction with communication and care and decreased surrogate/clinician distress were positive. Further research is needed to appropriately tailor interventions and outcomes for local contexts, set appropriate expectations of ACP outcomes, and standardize across studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan D McMahan
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.,San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California
| | - Ismael Tellez
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.,San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California
| | - Rebecca L Sudore
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.,San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|