1
|
Dy SM, Scerpella DL, Hanna V, Walker KA, Sloan DH, Green CM, Cotter V, Wolff JL, Giovannetti ER, McGuire M, Hussain N, Smith KM, Saylor MA. Qualitative evaluation of the SHARING Choices trial of primary care advance care planning for adults with and without dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 2024. [PMID: 39211999 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.19154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2024] [Revised: 07/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary care can be an important setting for communication and advance care planning (ACP), including for those with dementia and their families. The study objective was to explore experiences with a pragmatic trial of a communication and ACP intervention, SHARING Choices, in primary care for older adults with and without dementia. METHODS We conducted qualitative interviews using tailored semi-structured guides with three groups: ACP facilitators who conducted the intervention; clinicians, managers, and administrators from sites randomized to the intervention; and patients and families who met with ACP facilitators. We used thematic analysis to identify and synthesize emergent themes based on key Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research concepts and Proctor's Implementation Outcomes, triangulating the three groups' perspectives. RESULTS We identified five key themes. For acceptability, perceptions of the intervention were mostly positive, although some components were not generally implemented. For adoption, respondents perceived that ACP facilitators mainly focused on conducting ACP, although facilitators often did not implement the ADRD and family engagement aspects with the ACP. For relational connections, ACP facilitator-practice and clinician communication and engagement were key to how the intervention was implemented. For adaptability, ACP facilitators and health systems adapted how the ACP facilitation component was implemented to local preferences and over time, given the pragmatic nature of the trial. And, for sustainability, ACP facilitators and clinicians/managers/facilitators were positive that the intervention should be continued but noted barriers to its sustainability. Patients and families generally did not recall the intervention. CONCLUSIONS ACP facilitators and clinicians, managers, and administrators had positive perceptions of the ACP facilitator component of the intervention in this pragmatic trial with adaptation to local preferences. However, engaging those with dementia and families was more challenging in the implementation of this intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sydney M Dy
- Departments of Health Policy and Management and Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Daniel L Scerpella
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Valecia Hanna
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Danetta H Sloan
- Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Chase Mulholland Green
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Valerie Cotter
- Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jennifer L Wolff
- Departments of Health Policy and Management and Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Erin Rand Giovannetti
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, & Evaluation, University of Toronto and Michael Garron Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Maura McGuire
- Johns Hopkins Community Physicians, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Naaz Hussain
- Johns Hopkins Community Physicians, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kelly M Smith
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, & Evaluation, University of Toronto and Michael Garron Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kox RMK, Pasman HRW, van der Plas AGM, Huisman M, Hoogendijk EO, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD. End-of-life treatment preference discussions between older people and their physician before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross sectional and longitudinal analyses from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. BMC Geriatr 2023; 23:441. [PMID: 37464333 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04140-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 could lead to hospitalisation and ICU admission, especially in older adults. Therefore, during the pandemic, it became more important to discuss wishes and preferences, such as older peoples' desire for intensive treatment in a hospital in acute situations, or not. This study explores what percentage of Dutch older people aged 75 and over discussed Advance Care Planning (ACP) topics with a physician during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic and whether this was different in these people before the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS Data of two ancillary data collections of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam were used: the LASA 75 PLUS study and the LASA COVID-19 study. The latter provided cross sectional data (during COVID-19; n = 428) and longitudinal data came from participants in both studies (before and during COVID-19; n = 219). RESULTS Most older adults had thought about ACP topics during COVID-19 (76,4%), and a minority had also discussed ACP topics with a physician (20.3%). Thinking about ACP topics increased during COVID-19 compared to before COVID-19 in a sample with measurements on both timeframes (82,5% vs 68,0%). Not thinking about ACP topics decreased in the first months of the COVID-pandemic compared to before COVID-19 for all ACP topics together (68.0% vs 82.2%) and each topic separately (hospital 42.0% vs 63.9%; nursing home 36.5% vs 53.3%; treatment options 47.0% vs 62.1%; resuscitation 53.0% vs 70.7%). CONCLUSIONS Older people do think about ACP topics, which is an important first step in ACP, and this has increased during COVID-19. However, discussing ACP topics with a physician is still not that common. General practitioners could therefore take the initiative in broaching the subject of ACP. This can for instance be done by organizing information meetings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roosmarijne M K Kox
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Expertise Center for Palliative Care, Amsterdam UMC - Location VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H Roeline W Pasman
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Expertise Center for Palliative Care, Amsterdam UMC - Location VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Annicka G M van der Plas
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Expertise Center for Palliative Care, Amsterdam UMC - Location VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn Huisman
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC - Location VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Sociology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emiel O Hoogendijk
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC - Location VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Expertise Center for Palliative Care, Amsterdam UMC - Location VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dy SM, Scerpella DL, Cotter V, Colburn J, Roth DL, McGuire M, Giovannetti ER, Walker KA, Hussain N, Sloan DH, Boyd CM, Cockey K, Sharma N, Saylor MA, Smith KM, Wolff JL. SHARING Choices: Design and rationale for a pragmatic trial of an advance care planning intervention for older adults with and without dementia in primary care. Contemp Clin Trials 2022; 119:106818. [PMID: 35690262 PMCID: PMC9700199 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advance care planning (ACP) and involving family are particularly important in dementia, and primary care is a key setting. The purpose of this trial is to examine the impact and implementation of SHARING Choices, an intervention to improve communication for older adults with and without dementia through proactively supporting ACP and family engagement in primary care. METHODS We cluster-randomized 55 diverse primary care practices across two health systems to the intervention or usual care. SHARING Choices is a multicomponent intervention that aims to improve communication through patient and family engagement in ACP, agenda setting, and shared access to the patient portal for all patients over 65 years of age. The primary outcomes include documentation of an advance directive or medical orders for life-sustaining treatment in the electronic health record (EHR) at 12 months for all patients and receipt of potentially burdensome care within 6 months of death for the subgroup of patients with serious illness. We plan a priori sub-analysis for patients with dementia. Data sources include the health system EHRs and the Maryland health information exchange. We use a mixed-methods approach to evaluate uptake, fidelity and adaptation of the intervention and implementation facilitators and barriers. CONCLUSIONS This cluster-randomized pragmatic trial examines ACP with a focus on the key population of those with dementia, implementation in diverse settings and innovative approaches to trial design and outcome abstraction. Mixed-methods approaches enable understanding of intervention delivery and facilitators and barriers to implementation in rapidly changing health care systems. CLINICALTRIALS gov Identifier: NCT04819191.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sydney M Dy
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
| | - Daniel L Scerpella
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
| | - Valerie Cotter
- Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, 525 N. Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
| | - Jessica Colburn
- Division of Geriatric Medicine & Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5200 Eastern Avenue, Suite 2200, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
| | - David L Roth
- Center on Aging and Health, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, 2024 East Monument Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
| | - Maura McGuire
- Johns Hopkins Community Physicians, 2700 Remington Ave, Suite 2000, Baltimore, MD 21211, USA.
| | - Erin Rand Giovannetti
- Health Economics and Aging Research Institute, MedStar Health, 10,980 Grantchester Way, Columbia, MD 21044, USA.
| | - Kathryn A Walker
- MedStar Health, 10,980 Grantchester Way, Columbia, MD 21044, USA.
| | - Naaz Hussain
- Johns Hopkins Community Physicians, 45 TJ Drive, Suite 109, Frederick, MD 21702, USA.
| | - Danetta H Sloan
- Department of Health Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
| | - Cynthia M Boyd
- Division of Geriatric Medicine & Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5200 Eastern Avenue, Suite 2200, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
| | - Kimberley Cockey
- MedStar Health Institute for Quality and Safety, MedStar Health, 10,980 Grantchester Way, Columbia, MD 21044, USA.
| | - Neha Sharma
- MedStar Health, 10,980 Grantchester Way, Columbia, MD 21044, USA.
| | | | - Kelly M Smith
- MedStar Health Institute for Quality and Safety, MedStar Health, 10,980 Grantchester Way, Columbia, MD 21044, USA.
| | - Jennifer L Wolff
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van der Plas AGM, Schellekens JEAP, Glaudemans JJ, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD. The patient’s relationship with the General Practitioner before and after Advance Care Planning: pre/post-implementation study. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:558. [PMID: 35790910 PMCID: PMC9254656 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03256-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background General Practitioners (GPs) are central in the care of Dutch older people and in a good position to have Advance Care Planning (ACP) conversations. Interview studies reveal that the doctor-patient relationship is important when initiating ACP conversations and can also be influenced by ACP conversations. We aimed to examine the association between having an ACP conversation and the patient feeling the GP knows him or her and the patient trusting the GP and vice versa. Methods Implementation of ACP in primary care was evaluated in a pre-and post design. Questionnaires before implementation of ACP and 14 months later were sent to patients aged 75 years or older within 10 GP-practices and 2 care homes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the relationship between ACP conversations during implementation and the patient-GP relationship before implementation. Odds ratios were adjusted for potential confounders. Generalized ordered logistic regression was used to model the relationship between the changes in patient-GP relationship before and after implementation and ACP conversations during implementation. Results Four hundred fifty-eight patients filled out the pre- and post-test questionnaire. There was no association between the GP knowing the patient and trust in the pre-test and having an ACP conversation during the implementation. For people who had had an ACP conversation at the end of the implementation period their trust remained more often the same or was higher after implementation (trust to provide good care OR 2.93; trust to follow their wishes OR 2.59), compared to patients who did not have an ACP conversation. A reduction in trust was less likely to happen to patients who had an ACP conversation compared to patients who did not have an ACP conversation. Conclusions Although we have not found evidence for trust as a prerequisite for ACP conversations, this paper shows that ACP conversations can be beneficial for the doctor—patient relationship. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03256-4.
Collapse
|
5
|
Macchi ZA, Lum HD. Advance care planning in neurologic illness. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2022; 190:129-148. [PMID: 36055711 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-85029-2.00004-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Advance care planning (ACP) is an essential element of neuropalliative care for persons living acquired brain injuries or progressive, neurodegenerative conditions like dementia. This includes early recognition of these conditions as needing timely ACP conversations to maximize patient autonomy and capacity in early disease, leading to discussions and documentation of patients' values and preferences for future care. ACP involves assessing patient readiness, evaluating decision-making capacity, initiating discussions early and iteratively in the disease course, identifying and preparing surrogate decision makers, and documenting patients' goals-of-care. However, this process presents unique challenges for clinicians and patients' families as individuals lose the ability to meaningfully engage in conversations due to multiple factors related to brain dysfunction. This includes evaluations of capacity for medical decision-making which consider the context in which discussions are held across multiple timepoints with repeated conversations. Research has shown that engaging in early ACP leads to greater goal-concordant care in advanced neurologic illness and affects end-of-life medical decision-making. Clinicians should be familiar with the significance of ACP in this context, understand ways for approaching these difficult discussions with patients and their families, and be aware of evidence-based tools which prepare and aid patients for these discussions. Here, we review ACP in the context of serious neurologic illness and discuss how clinicians can approach conversations with patients and families, ensure patients' values and preferences are documented and available, and explore tools which may enhance the ACP process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary A Macchi
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States; Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Hillary D Lum
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kalluri M, Orenstein S, Archibald N, Pooler C. Advance Care Planning Needs in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Qualitative Study. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2021; 39:641-651. [PMID: 34433294 PMCID: PMC9082969 DOI: 10.1177/10499091211041724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Advance care planning is recommended in chronic respiratory diseases, including Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. In practice, uptake remains low due to patient, physician and system-related factors, including lack of time, training and guidance on timing, components and content of conversations. Our aim was to explore perspectives, experiences and needs to inform a framework. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study in western Canada, using semi-structured interviews and inductive analysis. Patient, caregiver and health care professional participants described advance care planning experiences with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Results: Twenty participants were interviewed individually: 5 patients, 5 caregivers, 5 home care and 5 acute care health care professionals. Two categories, perceptions and recommendations, were identified with themes and subthemes. Participant perceptions were insufficient information and conversations occur late. Recommendations were: have earlier conversations; have open conversations; provide detailed information; and plan for end-of-life. Patients and caregivers wanted honesty, openness and clarity. Professionals related delayed timing to poor end-of-life care and distressing deaths. Home care professionals described comfort with and an engaged approach to advance care planning. Acute care professionals perceived lack of clarity of roles and described personal, patient and caregiver distress. Interpretation: Analysis of diverse experiences provided further understanding of advance care planning in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Advance care planning is desired by patients and caregivers early in their illness experience. Health care professionals described a need to clarify role, scope and responsibility. Practical guidance and training must be available to care providers to improve competency and confidence in these conversations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meena Kalluri
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.,Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sara Orenstein
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Nathan Archibald
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Charlotte Pooler
- Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.,Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Combes S, Forbes G, Gillett K, Norton C, Nicholson CJ. Development of a theory-based intervention to increase cognitively able frail elders' engagement with advance care planning using the behaviour change wheel. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:712. [PMID: 34284759 PMCID: PMC8290869 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06548-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Advance care planning (ACP) conversations support people to think about, discuss and document their beliefs, values and preferences regarding future care. This process means that should the person loose capacity in the future, care can be provided, consistent with their personal values and beliefs. The ACP process is particularly relevant for older people living with frailty (frail elders) as they are vulnerable to sudden deterioration. However, ACP is rarely undertaken by frail elders. The aim of this study was to develop an intervention to increase multidisciplinary health and social care professionals’ (H&SCPs) engagement of cognitively able, domestic-dwelling frail elders with ACP. Methods Intervention development was guided by the Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions and the Behaviour Change Wheel. Multiple methods were used to understand ACP barriers and enablers: a systematic integrative review, a survey (n = 73 H&SCPs), and semi-structured interviews (n = 10 frail elders, n = 8 family members). A conceptual model, developed from the integrative review, underpinned data collection for the survey and interviews. Synthesis of this data, including patient and public involvement, was then used to identify H&SCPs behaviours that needed to change for ACP to be implemented and decide content and implementation for the intervention. Results Following the Behaviour Change Wheel system, and based on the findings of the review, survey and interviews, the prototype intervention, Conversations on Living and Dying (CLaD), was developed. The CLaD prototype consisted of one 3.5-hour educational skills session for H&SCPs supported by a toolkit. Content focussed on the relevance of ACP for frail elders, experience of ACP by frail elders, and strategies H&SCPs could adopt to encourage frail elders’ engagement with ACP. Strategies include recognising the importance of relationships and living well now, preparing frail elders for ACP conversations and starting ACP early. Participants who took part in initial prototype refinement reported that the intervention helped them think differently about ACP and encouraged them to engage with frail elders. Conclusions The use of behavioural theory enabled the development of CLaD, an evidence-based, theory-driven, person-centred intervention to support ACP engagement with frail elders. While feasibility testing is required, initial prototype refinement demonstrated that H&SCPs found the intervention to be acceptable, engaging, and clinically valuable in their practice with frail elders and their families. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06548-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Combes
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8WA, UK. .,St Christopher's Hospice, London, UK.
| | - G Forbes
- Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, UK
| | - K Gillett
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8WA, UK
| | - C Norton
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8WA, UK
| | - C J Nicholson
- St Christopher's Hospice, London, UK.,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Surrey University, Guildford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van der Plas AGM, Pasman HRW, Kox RMK, Ponstein M, Dame B, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD. Information meetings on end-of-life care for older people by the general practitioner to stimulate advance care planning: a pre-post evaluation study. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2021; 22:109. [PMID: 34092218 PMCID: PMC8183039 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01463-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background To increase knowledge about options people have concerning end-of-life-care issues, General Practitioners (GPs) can organise meetings to inform their older patients. We evaluated these meetings, using the following research questions: How did the attendees experience the information meeting? Was there a rise in Advance Care Planning (ACP) behaviour after the information meeting? Was there a change in trust people have that physicians will provide good care at the end of life and that they will follow their end-of-life wishes after the information meetings? Methods Four GPs invited all patients of 75 years and older registered in their GP practices to the meeting via a written letter. Four meetings of 2 h took place in 2016. Meetings started with a presentation on end-of-life topics and ACP by the GP followed by time for questions. A pre-post evaluation study was done using written questionnaires distributed and filled in at the start of the meeting (T0) at the end of the meeting (T1) and 6 months after the meeting (T2). Results In total 225 older people attended a meeting of which 154 (68%) filled in the questionnaire at T0 and 145 (64%) filled in the questionnaire at T1. After six months, 90 of the 121 people who approved of being sent another questionnaire at T2, returned it (40%). The average age of the respondents was 80 years (T0). The meetings were evaluated positively by the attendees (T1). ACP issues (appointing a proxy, resuscitation, hospitalisation, euthanasia, treatment preferences under certain circumstances, preferred place of care and nursing home admittance) were discussed with a physician, a relative or both more often in the 6 months after having attended the meeting (T2), compared to before (T0). Compared to before the meeting (T0), trust in the GP providing good end-of-life care and following end-of-life wishes was higher immediately after the meeting (T1), but not after 6 months (T2). Conclusion Information meetings on end-of-life care by GPs have a positive influence on the occurrence of ACP, both with the physician and others. Although, this method especially reaches the older people that are already interested in the subject, this seems a relatively easy way to stimulate ACP. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-021-01463-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annicka G M van der Plas
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Location VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - H Roeline W Pasman
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Location VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Roosmarijne M K Kox
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Location VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Bea Dame
- Zorggroep Almere, Almere, The Netherlands
| | - Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Location VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Moses A, Dharod A, Williamson J, Pajewski NM, Tuerff D, Guo J, Gabbard J. Considerations for Integrating Advance Care Planning Into the Electronic Health Record: A Primer for Clinicians. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2020; 37:1004-1008. [PMID: 32115994 DOI: 10.1177/1049909120909303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Opportunities for expanding advance care planning (ACP) throughout the health-care system make it critical that primary care (PC) providers have a basic understanding of how the electronic health record (EHR) can aid promoting ACP discussions and documentation. This article will offer PC providers 5 useful tips for implementing ACP in outpatient settings utilizing the EHR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Moses
- Department of Internal Medicine, 528756Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA.,Center for Healthcare Innovation, 528756Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston Salem, NC, USA
| | - Ajay Dharod
- Department of Internal Medicine, 528756Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA.,Center for Healthcare Innovation, 528756Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston Salem, NC, USA.,Department of Public Health Sciences, 12279Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA
| | - Jeff Williamson
- Department of Internal Medicine, 528756Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA.,Center for Healthcare Innovation, 528756Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston Salem, NC, USA.,Department of Public Health Sciences, 12279Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA
| | - Nicholas M Pajewski
- Center for Healthcare Innovation, 528756Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston Salem, NC, USA.,Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, 12279Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA
| | - Daniel Tuerff
- 12279Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA
| | - Jia Guo
- 12279Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer Gabbard
- Department of Internal Medicine, 528756Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA.,Center for Healthcare Innovation, 528756Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston Salem, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|