Parent Perspective and Response to Challenges and Priorities for Pediatric Palliative Care Research

Who, What, Where, and How? The State of Family Science in Pediatric Palliative Care

CONTEXT

Families are vital providers and recipients of pediatric palliative care (PPC) services. Understanding the scope and nature of evidence at the intersection of family science and PPC research is necessary to develop family-focused interventions that enhance child and family health.

OBJECTIVES

Explore and describe the family-level impact of pediatric serious illness.

METHODS

We conducted a librarian-assisted scoping review using Arskey and O'Malley's approach. We searched PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases for empirical publications from 2016 to 2021 that focused on families navigating serious pediatric illness published in English. Two reviewers assessed eligibility, with discrepancies resolved by a third. We used Covidence and REDCap for data management and extraction.

RESULTS

We screened 10,983 abstracts; 309 abstracts were included in full text screening. The final group of 52 citations was analyzed by the entire team. Most research was conducted in Western Europe and North America. The perspectives of parents of children with cancer were most frequently described; voices of seriously ill youth and their siblings were less often presented. Most of the research was descriptive qualitative, followed by descriptive quantitative. Few studies were mixed methods, inferential, or interpretive. Studies most often described parent, youth, and family experience with illness and less often explored family processes and relationships. Irrespective of the approach (i.e., qualitative, quantitative), few studies focused on families as the analytic unit or used family-level analysis techniques. Study participants were usually from local dominant populations and less often from historically marginalized communities.

CONCLUSION

The robust, descriptive, and individual-level evidence describing family impact of serious pediatric illness provides a solid foundation for future research priorities. Stronger integration of family techniques and diverse family voices in pediatric palliative care research can clarify family processes, illuminate structural barriers, and inform interventions that are responsive to family needs. These steps will enhance the education, policy, and clinical provision of PPC to all who would benefit, thereby advancing health equity for children living with serious illness and their families.

Building Family Interventions for Scalability and Impact

Family nursing researchers are charged with addressing the conceptual and methodological underpinnings of family research when developing family-focused interventions. Step-by-step guidance is needed that integrates current science of intervention development with family science and helps researchers progress from foundational work to experimental work with policy integration. The purpose of this manuscript is to provide pragmatic, evidence-based guidance for advancing family intervention research from foundational work through efficacy testing. Guidance regarding the development of family interventions is presented using the first three of Sidani's five-stage method: (a) foundational work to understand the problem targeted for change; (b) intervention development and assessment of acceptability and feasibility; and (c) efficacy testing. Each stage of family intervention development is described in terms of process, design considerations, and policy and practice implications. Examples are included to emphasize the family lens. This manuscript provides guidance to family scientists for intervention development and implementation to advance family nursing science and inform policy.

Parent Perspectives on Defining Neonatal Serious Illness

Objectives: We hoped to understand (1) how parents of seriously ill neonatal intensive care unit patients conceptualize neonatal serious illness, and (2) how parent and physician perspectives on neonatal serious illness might differ. Design: This was a prospective survey study. Setting/Subjects: Parent members of the Courageous Parents Network. Measurements: We circulated a modified version of a previously developed survey. Participants were presented with a list of potential definition components and asked to rank components by importance and suggest modifications to the definition as needed. Thematic analysis of free-text responses was conducted to identify key themes in parent responses Results: Eighty-eight percent of parent participants agreed or strongly agreed with our working definition of neonatal serious illness. Parents agreed with the content of the definition but suggested using different language (especially less jargon) when using the definition to inform conversations with parents. Conclusions: The majority of parents surveyed for this study supported our definition of neonatal serious illness, which suggests that it may be useful for clinical and research applications. At the same time, parent responses revealed important differences in perceptions about serious illness between parents and physicians. In addition, parents will likely use any definition of neonatal serious illness differently than clinicians. We therefore propose that our definition be used to identify neonates with serious illness for the purposes of research and clinical care, but should not be used verbatim for communication with parents.

The 2023-2026 Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association Research Agenda

The Hospice and Palliative Nursing Association established the triannual research agenda to ( a ) provide focus for researchers to conduct meaningful scientific and quality improvement initiatives and inform evidence-based practice, ( b ) guide organizational funding, and ( c ) illustrate to other stakeholders the importance of nursing research foci. HPNA Research Agendas are developed to give direction for future research to continue advancing expert care in serious illness and ensure equitable delivery of hospice and palliative care.

Defining Neonatal Serious Illness

Background: One major challenge to the conduct of rigorous neonatal palliative care research is the lack of robust universally agreed upon definitions of key concepts central to pediatric and neonatal palliative care. Objective: We sought to define neonatal serious illness as a foundational concept for neonatal palliative care. Design: Survey study. Setting/Subjects: Practitioners in the United States with expertise in neonatal serious illness. Measurements: Participants ranked 15 components according to how important each would be to include in a conceptual definition of neonatal serious illness. Based on rankings and free text responses, a working definition was created and a follow-up survey was circulated. Participants then ranked the extent to which the proposed definition comprehensively defines neonatal serious illness. The definition was further refined based on responses to the second survey. Results: Eighty experts responded to our first survey. Definition components ranked as most important included "high risk of short term mortality" and "results in shortened lifespan." Analysis of free text responses revealed additional components viewed as important. We developed the following conceptual definition: "Neonatal serious illness 1) carries a high risk of short term mortality OR lifelong medical complexity with probable shortened lifespan, 2) may involve substantial prognostic uncertainty (especially in regard to neurodevelopment) that complicates medical decision-making, and 3) significantly impacts the patient and family's life now or in the future with strain related to treatments and care." Conclusion: We believe our definition of neonatal serious illness will facilitate future study essential to the advancement of care for this population.

Balancing Protection and Progress in Pediatric Palliative Care Research: Stakeholder Perspectives

Pediatric palliative care, including end-of-life care, remains a relatively new area of interdisciplinary clinical practice and research. Improving the multifaceted and complex care of children and their families involves research that (1) documents the experiences of children with serious illness, their families, and clinicians; (2) evaluates relationships between contextual factors and health outcomes; and (3) establishes a stronger foundation for child- and family-focused interventions to improve care. Partnership among stakeholders in family-focused research begins from design through conduct of the study. This partnership is the foundation of a dynamic research process that illuminates critical perspectives. We present a hypothetical pediatric palliative study; a qualitative descriptive study of the perspectives of adolescents and young adults with life-limiting illnesses and their parents after a discussion about an end-of-life decision. Pediatric palliative care researchers, institutional review board leaders, and the parent of a child who died comment on how to balance the obligations to improve clinical care and to protect participants in research. Their recommendations include recruiting a wide range of participants, differentiating emotional responses from harm, approaching potential participants as individuals, and seeking feedback from family advisory boards and designated reviewers with content expertise.

Social Determinants of Comfort: A New Way of Conceptualizing Pediatric End-of-Life Care

The social determinants of comfort describe structural conditions that influence whether, to what degree, and in what forms comfort measures are offered to and accepted by people living with serious illness and their families. The notion of social determinants of comfort builds on the well-accepted concept of social determinants of health. Although some guiding palliative care documents begin to address this intersection, deeper understanding and exploration are needed. The goals of this article are to (1) describe and articulate the impact of structural and ecological factors on the comfort children and families can attain near the end of life; (2) describe how to address these factors to support children and families in attaining comfort, and maybe even flourish, at end of life; and (3) provide an agenda for research that addresses how palliative care research can advance health equity and how a focus on equity can advance palliative care science. A variety of inequities reinforce social vulnerability and disadvantage throughout the life span and can have profound effects on children, particularly children with serious illness or at the end of life. Ethical care for these children requires recognition of the social determinants of comfort.

Parents as Advocates for Pediatric Palliative Care

Caring for a child with a serious or life-limiting illness presents many challenges for families and health care providers. Through that experience (and, many times, as it ends), parents are compelled to find and make meaning from their ultimate loss and the many losses along the way. In this Advocacy Case Study, we describe the experiences that led a bereaved mother to seek to harness the insights from her own family's loss to help support other families facing the challenges and complexities of a child's serious illness. Her family initially established a family foundation to advocate for palliative care. She later partnered with her family's general pediatrician and the American Academy of Pediatrics to educate providers and bring parent voices to health care provider discussions. This work eventually led to the development of the Courageous Parents Network, a nonprofit focused on making these parent and provider voices widely available to families and providers through a Web-based collection of videos, blogs, podcasts, and printable guides. Through these insights, the organization addresses feelings of isolation, anxiety, and grief. In addition, these voices illustrate the power and benefits of the growing acceptance of pediatric palliative care practices. Important lessons learned through these efforts include: (1) the power of stories for validation, healing, and understanding; (2) opportunity to extend the reach of pediatric palliative care through provider education and skill-building; (3) critical importance of the parent-provider advocacy collaboration; and (4) necessity of market testing and continuous improvement.

Multifaceted Support Interventions for Siblings of Children With Cancer: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

When a child is given a diagnosis of cancer, the impact reverberates through the family unit. Siblings, in particular, experience an accumulation of distress. Siblings of children with cancer can experience both short- and long-term difficulties in psychosocial and physical functioning, and professional bodies have called for interventions targeted at their needs.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe outcomes, core components, and general characteristics of effective interventions intended to support sibling well-being and psychosocial health in pediatric oncology.

METHODS

MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched in September 2019 and July 2020. Studies were included if they focused on interventions for siblings or family in pediatric cancer, had quantitative data to describe the effect or impact of the intervention, and were published in English. Included studies underwent quality appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis.

RESULTS

Twenty articles fit inclusion criteria. Most interventions focused on 6- to 18-year-old siblings within a group setting. Most were theory based. Group format with multiple sessions was the most common approach. The most frequently assessed outcomes were depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress symptoms, and health-related quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding outcomes, core components, and characteristics of effective interventions is important to translate sibling-support interventions into standard practice. Such considerations are important in delivering equitable family-centered care to siblings of children with cancer.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

As institutions create mechanisms to support siblings, it may be important to target high-risk siblings initially, partner with community resources, attend to underrecognized populations of siblings, and more fully incorporate family into sibling support.

Family Caregivers of Children With Medical Complexity: Health-Related Quality of Life and Experiences of Care Coordination

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between care coordination experiences of family caregivers of children with medical complexity (CMC) and caregivers' health-related quality of life (HR-QOL).

METHODS

From July 2018 to July 2019, family caregivers of CMC completed an electronic survey (n = 136) at the time of initial contact with a regional complex care medical home. Information on caregiver HR-QOL and receipt of care coordination services were assessed using the Center for Disease Control's HR-QOL-14 measure and Family Experiences of Care Coordination questionnaire, respectively. Negative binomial regression, adjusted for caregiver and child characteristics, examined associations between caregiver HR-QOL and caregiver experiences of care coordination.

RESULTS

In the 30 days prior to initial contact, CMC caregivers reported a median of 3.5 mentally unhealthy days, 2 days felt depressed, 7 days felt anxious, and 16 days with insufficient sleep. Caregivers who had a knowledgeable, supportive care coordinator who advocates for their child reported significantly fewer days mentally unhealthy (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22-0.95), depressed (IRR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21-0.91), or anxious (IRR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.29-0.85). Having a shared care plan was associated with significantly fewer days mentally unhealthy (IRR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.23-0.93) or anxious (IRR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.31-0.92). Having a written visit summary with appropriate content was associated with fewer days of insufficient sleep (IRR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43-0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

CMC family caregivers report experiencing mentally unhealthy days and negative mental symptom days. The experience of specific care coordination activities was associated with higher caregiver mental HR-QOL.