1
|
Chuzi S, Manning K. Integration of palliative care across the spectrum of heart failure care and therapies: considerations, contemporary data, and challenges. Curr Opin Cardiol 2024; 39:218-225. [PMID: 38567949 DOI: 10.1097/hco.0000000000001120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Heart failure (HF) is characterized by significant symptoms, compromised quality of life, frequent hospital admissions, and high mortality, and is therefore well suited to palliative care (PC) intervention. This review elaborates the current PC needs of patients with HF across the spectrum of disease, including patients who undergo advanced HF surgical therapies, and reviews the current data and future directions for PC integration in HF care. RECENT FINDINGS Patients with chronic HF, as well as those who are being evaluated for or who have undergone advanced HF surgical therapies such as left ventricular assist device or heart transplantation, have a number of PC needs, including decision-making, symptoms and quality of life, caregiver support, and end-of-life care. Available data primarily supports the use of PC interventions in chronic HF to improve quality of life and symptoms. PC skills and teams may also help address preparedness planning, adverse events, and psychosocial barriers in patients who have had HF surgeries, but more data are needed to determine association with outcomes. SUMMARY Patients with HF have tremendous PC needs across the spectrum of disease. Despite this, more data are needed to determine the optimal timing and structure of PC interventions in patients with chronic HF, left ventricular assist device, and heart transplantation. Future steps must be taken in clinical, research, and policy domains in order to optimize care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Chuzi
- Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Katharine Manning
- Heart and Vascular Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
- Section of Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kates J, Stricker CT, Rising KL, Gentsch AT, Solomon E, Powers V, Salcedo VJ, Worster B. Perspectives from patients with chronic lung disease on a telehealth-facilitated integrated palliative care model: a qualitative content analysis study. BMC Palliat Care 2024; 23:103. [PMID: 38637806 PMCID: PMC11027367 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01433-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic lung disease affects nearly 37 million Americans and often results in significant quality of life impairment and healthcare burden. Despite guidelines calling for palliative care (PC) integration into pulmonary care as a vital part of chronic lung disease management, existing PC models have limited access and lack scalability. Use of telehealth to provide PC offers a potential solution to these barriers. This study explored perceptions of patients with chronic lung disease regarding a telehealth integrated palliative care (TIPC) model, with plans to use findings to inform development of an intervention protocol for future testing. METHODS For this qualitative study, we conducted semi-structured interviews between June 2021- December 2021 with patients with advanced chronic lung disease. Interviews explored experiences with chronic lung disease, understanding of PC, and perceived acceptability of the proposed model along with anticipated facilitators and barriers of the TIPC model. We analyzed findings with a content analysis approach. RESULTS We completed 20 interviews, with two that included both a patient and caregiver together due to patient preference. Perceptions were primarily related to three categories: burden of chronic lung disease, pre-conceived understanding of PC, and perspective on the proposed TIPC model. Analysis revealed a high level of disease burden related to chronic lung disease and its impact on day-to-day functioning. Although PC was not well understood, the TIPC model using a shared care planning approach via telehealth was seen by most as an acceptable addition to their chronic lung disease care. CONCLUSIONS These findings emphasize the need for a patient-centered, shared care planning approach in chronic lung disease. The TIPC model may be one option that may be acceptable to individuals with chronic lung disease. Future work includes using findings to refine our TIPC model and conducting pilot testing to assess acceptability and utility of the model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeannette Kates
- College of Nursing, Thomas Jefferson University, 901 Walnut Street, Suite 702, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
| | - Carrie Tompkins Stricker
- College of Nursing, Thomas Jefferson University, 901 Walnut Street, Suite 702, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
- Canopy Cancer Collective, P.O. Box 3141, Saratoga, CA, 95070, USA
| | - Kristin L Rising
- Center for Connected Care, Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut Street, Suite 300, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 South 10th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Alexzandra T Gentsch
- Center for Connected Care, Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut Street, Suite 300, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Ellen Solomon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Victoria Powers
- Center for Connected Care, Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut Street, Suite 300, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Venise J Salcedo
- Center for Connected Care, Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut Street, Suite 300, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Brooke Worster
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut Street, Suite 420A, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Godfrey S, Peng Y, Lorusso N, Sulistio M, Mentz RJ, Pandey A, Warraich H. Palliative Care for Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. Circ Heart Fail 2023; 16:e010802. [PMID: 37869880 DOI: 10.1161/circheartfailure.123.010802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has become the leading form of heart failure worldwide, particularly among elderly patient populations. HFpEF is associated with significant morbidity and mortality that may benefit from incorporation of palliative care (PC). Patients with HFpEF have similarly high mortality rates to patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. PC trials for heart failure have shown improvement in quality of life, quality of death, and health care utilization, although most trials defined heart failure clinically without differentiating between HFpEF and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. As such, the timing and role of PC for HFpEF care remains uncertain, and PC referral rates for HFpEF are very low despite potential improvements in important patient-centered outcomes. Specific barriers to referral include limited data, prognostic uncertainty, provider misconceptions about PC, inadequate specialty PC workforce, complexities of treating multimorbidity, and limited home care options for patients with heart failure. While there are many barriers to integration of PC into HFpEF care, there are multiple potential benefits to patients with HFpEF throughout their disease course. As this population continues to grow, targeted efforts to study and implement PC interventions are needed to improve patient quality of life and death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Godfrey
- Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.G., M.S., A.P.)
| | | | - Nicholas Lorusso
- Department of Natural Sciences, University of North Texas at Dallas (N.L.)
| | - Melanie Sulistio
- Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.G., M.S., A.P.)
| | - Robert J Mentz
- Duke University Medical Center, Division of Cardiology, Durham, NC (R.J.M.)
| | - Ambarish Pandey
- Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.G., M.S., A.P.)
| | - Haider Warraich
- Division of Cardiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (H.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Godfrey S, Kirkpatrick JN, Kramer DB, Sulistio MS. Expanding the Paradigm for Cardiovascular Palliative Care. Circulation 2023; 148:1039-1052. [PMID: 37747951 PMCID: PMC10539017 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.123.063193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide. Despite medical advances, patients with CVD experience high morbidity and mortality rates, affecting their quality of life and death. Among CVD conditions, palliative care has been studied mostly in patients with heart failure, where palliative care interventions have been associated with improvements in patient-centered outcomes, including quality of life, end-of-life care, and health care use. Although palliative care is now incorporated into the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Heart Failure Society of America guidelines for heart failure, the role of palliative care for non-heart failure CVD remains uncertain. Across all causes of CVD, palliative care can play an important role in all domains of CVD care from initial diagnosis to terminal care. In addition to general cardiovascular palliative care practices applicable to all areas, disease-specific palliative care needs may warrant individualized palliative care models. In this review, we discuss the role of cardiovascular palliative care for ischemic heart disease, valvular disease, arrhythmias, peripheral artery disease, and adult congenital heart disease. Although there are multiple barriers to cardiovascular palliative care, we recommend a framework for studying and developing cardiovascular palliative care models to improve patient-centered goal-concordant care for this underserved patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Godfrey
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Division of Cardiology, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Daniel B. Kramer
- Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Melanie S. Sulistio
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Division of Cardiology, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Broese J, van der Kleij RM, Verschuur EM, Kerstjens HA, Bronkhorst EM, Engels Y, Chavannes NH. The effect of an integrated palliative care intervention on quality of life and acute healthcare use in patients with COPD: Results of the COMPASSION cluster randomized controlled trial. Palliat Med 2023; 37:844-855. [PMID: 37002561 DOI: 10.1177/02692163231165106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND COPD causes high morbidity and mortality, emphasizing the need for palliative care. AIM To assess the effectiveness of palliative care in patients with COPD. DESIGN Cluster randomized controlled trial (COMPASSION study; Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): NL7644, 07-04-2019). Healthcare providers within the intervention group were trained to implement palliative care components into routine COPD care. Patients completed questionnaires at baseline, after 3 and 6 months; medical records were assessed after 12 months. The primary outcome was quality of life (FACIT-Pal). Secondary outcomes were anxiety, depression, spiritual well-being, satisfaction with care, acute healthcare use, documentation of life-sustaining treatment preferences and place of death. Generalized linear mixed modelling was used for analyses. SETTING Eight hospital regions in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS Patients hospitalized for an acute exacerbation of COPD and positive ProPal-COPD score. RESULTS Of 222 patients included, 106 responded to the questionnaire at 6 months. Thirty-six of 98 intervention patients (36.7%) received the intervention. Intention-to-treat-analysis showed no effect on the primary outcome (adjusted difference: 1.09; 95% confidence interval: -5.44 to 7.60). In the intervention group, fewer intensive care admissions for COPD took place (adjusted odds ratio: 0.21; 95% confidence interval: 0.03-0.81) and strong indications were found for fewer hospitalizations (adjusted incidence rate ratio: 0.69; 95% confidence interval: 0.46-1.03). CONCLUSIONS We found no evidence that palliative care improves quality of life in patients with COPD. However, it can potentially reduce acute healthcare use. The consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic led to suboptimal implementation and insufficient power, and may have affected some of our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Broese
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Lung Alliance Netherlands, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Rianne Mjj van der Kleij
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Huib Am Kerstjens
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Tuberculosis, University of Groningen and University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ewald M Bronkhorst
- Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne Engels
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Niels H Chavannes
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Orlovic M, Mossialos E, Orkaby AR, Joseph J, Gaziano JM, Skarf LM, Nohria A, Warraich HJ. Challenges for Patients Dying of Heart Failure and Cancer. Circ Heart Fail 2022; 15:e009922. [PMID: 36321448 DOI: 10.1161/circheartfailure.122.009922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospice and palliative care were originally implemented for patients dying of cancer, both of which continue to be underused in patients with heart failure (HF). The objective of this study was to understand the unique challenges faced by patients dying of HF compared with cancer. METHODS We assessed differences in demographics, health status, and financial burden between patients dying of HF and cancer from the Health and Retirement Study. RESULTS The analysis included 3203 individuals who died of cancer and 3555 individuals who died of HF between 1994 and 2014. Compared with patients dying of cancer, patients dying of HF were older (80 years versus 76 years), had poorer self-reported health, and had greater difficulty with all activities of daily living while receiving less informal help. Their death was far more likely to be considered unexpected (39% versus 70%) and they were much more likely to have died without warning or within 1 to 2 hours (20% versus 1%). They were more likely to die in a hospital or nursing home than at home or in hospice. Both groups faced similarly high total healthcare out-of-pockets costs ($9988 versus $9595, P=0.6) though patients dying of HF had less wealth ($29 895 versus $39 008), thereby experiencing greater financial burden. CONCLUSIONS Compared with patients dying of cancer, those dying from HF are older, have greater difficulty with activities of daily living, are more likely to die suddenly, in a hospital or nursing home rather than home or hospice, and had worse financial burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Orlovic
- Imperial College London, Department of Surgery and Cancer, UK (M.O.).,London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Health Policy, UK (M.O., E.M.)
| | - Elias Mossialos
- London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Health Policy, UK (M.O., E.M.)
| | - Ariela R Orkaby
- Department of Medicine, VA Boston Healthcare System, MA (A.R.O., J.J., J.M.G., L.M.S., H.J.W.).,New England Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, MA (A.R.O., J.M.G.).,Division of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (A.R.O.)
| | - Jacob Joseph
- Department of Medicine, VA Boston Healthcare System, MA (A.R.O., J.J., J.M.G., L.M.S., H.J.W.).,Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (J.J., A.N., H.J.W.)
| | - J Michael Gaziano
- Department of Medicine, VA Boston Healthcare System, MA (A.R.O., J.J., J.M.G., L.M.S., H.J.W.).,New England Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, MA (A.R.O., J.M.G.)
| | - Lara M Skarf
- Department of Medicine, VA Boston Healthcare System, MA (A.R.O., J.J., J.M.G., L.M.S., H.J.W.)
| | - Anju Nohria
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (J.J., A.N., H.J.W.)
| | - Haider J Warraich
- Department of Medicine, VA Boston Healthcare System, MA (A.R.O., J.J., J.M.G., L.M.S., H.J.W.).,Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (J.J., A.N., H.J.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
The Role of Palliative Care in COPD. Chest 2021; 161:1250-1262. [PMID: 34740592 PMCID: PMC9131048 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.10.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the fourth leading cause of death in the United States and is a serious respiratory illness characterized by years of progressively debilitating breathlessness, high prevalence of associated depression and anxiety, frequent hospitalizations, and diminished wellbeing. Despite the potential to confer significant quality of life benefits for patients and their care partners and to improve end-of-life care, specialist palliative care is rarely implemented in COPD and when initiated it often occurs only at the very end of life. Primary palliative care delivered by frontline clinicians is a feasible model, but is not routinely integrated in COPD. In this review, we discuss the following: 1) the role of specialist and primary palliative care for patients with COPD and the case for earlier integration into routine practice; 2) the domains of the National Consensus Project Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care applied to people living with COPD and their care partners; and, 3) triggers for initiating palliative care and practical ways to implement palliative care using case-based examples. In the end, this review solidifies that palliative care is much more than hospice and end-of-life care and demonstrates that early palliative care is appropriate at any point during the COPD trajectory. We emphasize that palliative care should be integrated long before the end of life to provide comprehensive support for patients and their care partners and to better prepare them for the end of life.
Collapse
|