Defining Core Competencies and a Call to Action: Dissecting and Embracing the Crucial and Multifaceted Social Work Role in Pediatric Palliative Care

Quality of Care in the Last Two Years of Life for Children With Complex Chronic Conditions

CONTEXT

Limited data exists about care received by children with complex chronic conditions (CCCs) in the final years of their disease and end-of-life (EOL).

OBJECTIVE

To examine hospital performance on EOL quality measures and to describe healthcare services during the last two years of life for children with CCCs who died in-hospital.

METHODS

Retrospective automated electronic health record review of children with ≥1 CCC ICD-10 diagnosis code, who died inpatient between October 2020 and March 2023 at a single quaternary U.S. children's hospital. Quality was assessed based on performance on 15 measures across five domains: healthcare utilization, interprofessional supports, medical intensity, symptom management, and communication. Quality EOL care and healthcare services in the last two years of life were determined overall by age group and per patient. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate demographic differences by age.

RESULTS

266 children with CCCs died in the study timeframe; 45% were infants (n = 120), 52% (n = 137) were male, 42% (n = 113) were white, 64% (n = 170) were non-Hispanic, and 59% (n=156) had public insurance. Children had a median of three CCCs (IQR 2.4; range 1-8). On average, children met 69% (SD 13%) of EOL quality measures for which they were eligible. In the two years prior to death, 98% (n = 261) had an ICU admission, 75% (n = 200) had a procedure requiring sedation, and 29% (n = 79) had received cardiopulmonary resuscitation. 86% (n = 229) died in the ICU.

CONCLUSION

In this study, children with CCCs met 69% of quality measures and received high-intensity healthcare in the last two years of life.

Stress Among Parents of Children With Severe Neurological Impairment in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Background: Children with severe neurological impairment (SNI) often receive care in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), yet little is known about their parents' experiences. Objective: To examine sources of and changes in stress among parents of children with SNI in the PICU. To compare stressors with "good parent" attributes that describe duties parents aim to uphold for their child. Design/Setting/Subjects: Prospective mixed-methods cohort study at a single U.S. children's hospital. Participants included English-speaking parents/legal guardians of a child with SNI with an expected length of stay >1 week and life expectancy >4 weeks. Measurements: Ten-point stress scale administered at PICU admission and discharge with open-ended response items. A subset of parents completed 1:1 semistructured interviews. Data were integrated to examine differences among participants whose stress increased, stayed the same, or decreased, and themes were compared with "good parent" attributes. Results: Twenty-five parents/legal guardians completed the surveys; 15 completed the interviews. Children were a median of 7 years old (interquartile range [IQR] 4, 9; range 1-21) and had a median PICU length of stay of 10 days (IQR 7, 15; range 3-62). Twenty percent (n = 5) of parents were fathers, and 36% (n = 9) had a minority racial/ethnic background. Stress was moderate at admission (mean 6.8, standard deviation [SD] ±1.7) and discharge (mean 6, SD ±2); 32% (n = 8) reported stress trajectories that stayed the same or increased. Major themes included uncertainty, advocacy, and vulnerability and related closely to "good parent" attributes. Conclusion: Stress among parents of children with SNI related to uncertainty, advocacy, and vulnerability and suggested tensions with "good parent" attributes.

Psychologists as Pivotal Members of the Pediatric Palliative Care Team

CONTEXT

Pediatric psychologists possess unique expertise to positively impact the care provided to children with serious illness and their families. Despite increasing recognition regarding the value of psychology in palliative care, psychologists are not yet routinely integrated into pediatric palliative care (PPC) teams.

OBJECTIVES

This special paper seeks to demonstrate distinctive contributions psychologists can offer to PPC teams, patients, and families, as well as highlight how psychologists enhance the work of their interdisciplinary PPC colleagues.

METHODS

Existing literature, consensus and policy statements, and recently developed competencies inform and provide evidence for the value of incorporating psychologists into PPC.

RESULTS

As children with serious illness are at risk for mental and physical health symptoms, psychologists' specialized training in evidence-based assessment and intervention allows them to assess areas of concern, create treatment plans, and implement nonpharmacological therapies targeting symptom management and promotion of quality of life. By improving patient and family outcomes, psychology involvement saves money. In addition to clinical care, psychologists are skilled researchers, which can help to advance PPC interdisciplinary research. Lastly, psychologists can play a valuable role in contributing to PPC team education, dynamics, and well-being.

CONCLUSIONS

With strong skills in research, clinical care, education, and advocacy, pediatric psychologists are exceptionally equipped to provide care to children with serious illness and their families. Given their unique contributions, it is critical future efforts are directed towards advocating for the inclusion of psychologists into PPC, with the ultimate goal of improving care for children with serious illness and their families.

Educating Social Workers in Palliative and End-of-Life Care: Development and Implementation of a New National Training Program

Background: Educating Social Workers in Palliative and End-of-Life Care (ESPEC) is a nationally scalable continuing education program designed to improve the knowledge and skills of frontline health social workers caring for patients with serious illness. Objectives: This article describes ESPEC's rationale, development, and initial implementation. Design: Following the creation of consensus-derived core primary palliative care competencies for health primary care social workers based on the eight domains of palliative care outlined in the National Consensus Project Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care, an evidence-based curriculum was developed. This was used to develop a hybrid training model with a self-study component, synchronous instructor-led skills-based training, leadership training, and mentorship. The interactive curriculum incorporates patient scenarios highlighting the health social work role. Training targets high-impact skills-the biopsychosocial-spiritual assessment, advance care planning, family meetings, and interprofessional communication-and professional development. Settings/Subjects: ESPEC was launched in the United States in collaboration with the National Association of Social Workers (NASW) and the Social Work Hospice and Palliative Care Network (SWHPN). Results: The preliminary launch demonstrated high user acceptability, positive ratings for content and format, and gains in knowledge and competence. Conclusions: Data suggest that ESPEC can increase health social workers' knowledge and confidence as providers of palliative care interventions. National dissemination is ongoing.

Oncology social workers' involvement in palliative care: Secondary data analysis from nationwide oncology social workers survey

OBJECTIVES

Social workers are vital in delivering psychosocial services in palliative care, yet their specific roles in palliative oncology remain undefined. This study aimed to delineate the current practice role of oncology social workers involvement in palliative care in the United States.

METHODS

This study utilized a cross-sectional design and involved secondary analysis of data from a nationwide survey focused on workforce conditions for oncology social workers. The participants were social workers who were directly involved in providing care to cancer patients and delivering palliative care services. They completed an online survey in which they indicated the relevance of 91 tasks related to their practice. The survey also collected individual demographic and work-related characteristics. Exploratory factor analysis was used to achieve the study objective.

RESULTS

Responses from a secondary data set of 243 oncology social workers involved in palliative care results in a 6-factor solution comprising 34 tasks. These factors were identified as: Therapeutic Interventions for Individuals, Couples, and Families; Facilitate Patient Care Decision-making; Care Coordination; Assessment and Emotional Support; Organization and Community Service; and Equity and Justice. All 6 factors demonstrated good internal reliability, as indicated by Cronbach's alpha scores above 0.70.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

The findings can be used to develop job descriptions and education for social workers employed in palliative cancer care. The clear role descriptions also make social work visible to other professionals in palliative oncology. By clarifying the roles of oncology social workers, this study contributes to the improvement of palliative care delivery and enhances interprofessional collaboration within cancer care teams.

Barriers to Pediatric Palliative Care: Trainee and Faculty Perspectives Across Two Academic Centers

Objective: Barriers to palliative care for children with serious illness include system constraints and vastly different training and attitudes toward palliative care. This study aimed to explore trainee and faculty physician perceptions of barriers to palliative care across two pediatric centers to (1) examine differences between trainees and faculty and (2) compare these data with previous studies. Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted in fall 2021 among pediatric trainees and faculty physicians at three pediatric hospitals in two pediatric centers in the western United States. Surveys were distributed through hospital listservs and analyzed descriptively and through inductive thematic analysis. Results: There were a total of 268 participants: 50 trainees and 218 faculty physicians. Of the trainees, 46% (23) were fellows and 54% (27) were pediatric residents. Trainees and faculty reported the same four most common barriers, which were consistent with previous studies: family not ready to acknowledge an incurable condition (64% trainees and 45% faculty); family preference for more life-sustaining therapies than staff (52% and 39%); uncertain prognosis (48% and 38%); and parent discomfort with possibility of hastening death (44% and 30%). Other barriers commonly reported included time constraints, staff shortages, and conflict among family about treatment goals. Language barriers and cultural differences were also cited. Conclusions: This study examining palliative care across two pediatric centers suggests that providers' perceptions of family preferences and understanding of illness persist as barriers to the delivery of pediatric palliative care services. Future research should examine family-centered and culturally mindful interventions to better elucidate family perspectives on their child's illness to align care.

Competencies for Psychology Practice in Pediatric Palliative Care

OBJECTIVE

Pediatric psychologists have unique expertise to contribute to the care of youth with serious illnesses yet are not routinely integrated into pediatric palliative care (PPC) teams. To better define the role and unique skillset of psychologists practicing in PPC, support their systematic inclusion as part of PPC teams, and advance trainee knowledge of PPC principles and skills, the PPC Psychology Working Group sought to develop core competencies for psychologists in this subspecialty.

METHODS

A Working Group of pediatric psychologists with expertise in PPC met monthly to review literature and existing competencies in pediatrics, pediatric and subspecialty psychology, adult palliative care, and PPC subspecialties. Using the modified competency cube framework, the Working Group drafted core competencies for PPC psychologists. Interdisciplinary review was conducted by a diverse group of PPC professionals and parent advocates, and competencies were revised accordingly.

RESULTS

The six competency clusters include Science, Application, Education, Interpersonal, Professionalism, and Systems. Each cluster includes essential competencies (i.e., knowledge, skills, attitudes, roles) and behavioral anchors (i.e., examples of concrete application). Reviewer feedback highlighted clarity and thoroughness of competencies and suggested additional consideration of siblings and caregivers, spirituality, and psychologists' own positionality.

CONCLUSIONS

Newly developed competencies for PPC psychologists highlight unique contributions to PPC patient care and research and provide a framework for highlighting psychology's value in this emerging subspecialty. Competencies help to advocate for inclusion of psychologists as routine members of PPC teams, standardize best practices among the PPC workforce, and provide optimal care for youth with serious illness and their families.