Exploration of inhibition potential of isoniazid and its metabolites towards CYP2E1 in human liver microsomes through LC-MS/MS analysis

Effects of compound Anoectochilus roxburghii (Wall.) Lindl. oral liquid on relative metabolic enzymes and various biochemical indices in Wistar rats with isoniazid-induced liver injury

Isoniazid (INH) is the first-line anti-tuberculosis drug in clinical practice, and its main adverse effect is drug-induced liver injury (DILI). This study aimed to investigate the hepatoprotective effect of Compound Anoectochilus roxburghii (Wall.) Lindl. Oral Liquid (CAROL) and to provide a new strategy for the search of potential drugs against INH-induced liver injury in Wistar rats. Animal experiment was based on INH (100 mg/kg) induced liver injury to explore the intervention effects of CAROL at doses of 1.35, 2.70, and 5.40 mL/kg. LC-QTOF-MS/MS was used to identify hepatoprotective components in CAROL and its' exposed components in rat serum. The hepatoprotective effect of CAROL was evaluated by pathological observation of rat liver tissue and changes in levels of biochemical indices and cytokines in serum or liver tissue. Of the 58 hepatoprotective components identified, 15 were detected in the serum of rats with liver-injured treated by high-dose CAROL. Results of animal experiments showed that the levels of various biochemical indexes and cytokines were significantly reversed with CAROL intervention. In particular, the expression level of cytokeratin-18 and high-mobility group box 1, as specific and sensitive indicators of DILI, was significantly reduced in the serum of rats with CAROL intervention compared with the INH model group. The same reversal was observed in the levels of TBIL, ALP, ALT, and AST in serum, as well as in the levels of TNF-α, IL-6, SOD, and MDA in liver tissue. For INH-metabolizing enzymes, an evident expression inhibition was observed in N-acetyltransferase 2 and glutathione S-transferases with CAROL intervention, which may be the key to controlling INH hepatotoxicity. CAROL has a favorable hepatoprotective effect on INH-induced liver injury. This study takes the first step in studying the hepatoprotective mechanism of CAROL against INH hepatotoxicity and provides reference for wider clinical applications.

Effect of NAT2, GSTM1 and CYP2E1 genetic polymorphisms on plasma concentration of isoniazid and its metabolites in patients with tuberculosis, and the assessment of exposure-response relationships

Objectives: Isoniazid is a key drug in the chemotherapy of tuberculosis (TB), however, interindividual variability in pharmacokinetic parameters and drug plasma levels may affect drug responses including drug induced hepatotoxicity. The current study investigated the relationships between isoniazid exposure and isoniazid metabolism-related genetic factors in the context of occurrence of drug induced hepatotoxicity and TB treatment outcomes. Methods: Demographic characteristics and clinical information were collected in a prospective TB cohort study in Latvia (N = 34). Time to sputum culture conversion (tSCC) was used as a treatment response marker. Blood plasma concentrations of isoniazid (INH) and its metabolites acetylisoniazid (AcINH) and isonicotinic acid (INA) were determined at three time points (pre-dose (0 h), 2 h and 6 h after drug intake) using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Genetic variations of three key INH-metabolizing enzymes (NAT2, CYP2E1, and GSTM1) were investigated by application PCR- and Next-generation sequencing-based methods. Depending on variables, group comparisons were performed by Student's t-test, one-way ANOVA, Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated for the pairs of normally distributed variables; model with rank transformations were used for non-normally distributed variables. Time-to-event analysis was performed to analyze the tSCC data. The cumulative probability of tSCC was obtained using Kaplan-Meier estimators. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to estimate hazard rate ratios of successful tSCC. Results: High TB treatment success rate (94.1%) was achieved despite the variability in INH exposure. Clinical and demographic factors were not associated with either tSCC, hepatotoxicity, or INH pharmacokinetics parameters. Correlations between plasma concentrations of INH and its metabolites were NAT2 phenotype-dependent, while GSTM1 genetic variants did not showed any effects. CYP2E1*6 (T > A) allelic variant was associated with INH pharmacokinetic parameters. Decreased level of AcINH was associated with hepatotoxicity, while decreased values of INA/INH and AcINH/INH were associated with month two sputum culture positivity. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that CYP2E1, but not GSTM1, significantly affects the INH pharmacokinetics along with NAT2. AcINH plasma level could serve as a biomarker for INH-related hepatotoxicity, and the inclusion of INH metabolite screening in TB therapeutic drug monitoring could be beneficial in clinical studies for determination of optimal dosing strategies.

PBPK Analysis to Study the Impact of Genetic Polymorphism of NAT2 on Drug-Drug Interaction Potential of Isoniazid

PURPOSE

Isoniazid (INH) is prescribed both for the prophylaxis as well as the treatment of tuberculosis. It is primarily metabolized through acetylation by a highly polymorphic enzyme, N-acetyl transferase 2 (NAT2), owing to which significant variable systemic drug levels have been reported among slow and rapid acetylators. Furthermore, many drugs, like phenytoin, diazepam, triazolam, etc., are known to show toxic manifestation when co-administered with INH and it happens prominently among slow acetylators. Additionally, it is revealed in in vitro inhibition studies that INH carries noteworthy potential to inhibit CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 enzymes. However, CYP inhibitory effect of INH gets masked by opposite enzyme-inducing effect of rifampicin, when used in combination. Thus, distinct objective of this study was to fill the knowledge gaps related to gene-drug-drug interactions (DDI) potential of INH when given alone for prophylactic purpose.

METHODS

Whole body-PBPK models of INH were developed and verified for both slow and fast acetylators. The same were then utilized to carry out prospective DDI studies with CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 substrates in both acetylator types.

RESULTS

The results highlighted likelihood of significant higher blood levels of CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 substrate drugs in subjects receiving INH pre-treatment. It was also re-established that interaction was more likely in slow acetylators, as compared to rapid acetylators.

CONCLUSION

The novel outcome of the present study is the indication that prescribers should give careful consideration while advising CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 substrate drugs to subjects who are on prophylaxis INH therapy, and are slow to metabolic acetylation.