Parental Sources of Support and Guidance When Making Difficult Decisions in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Experiences of Inpatient Healthcare Services Among Children With Medical Complexity and Their Families: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Children with medical complexity (CMC) have high healthcare utilization and face unique challenges during hospital admissions. The evidence describing their experiences of inpatient care is distributed across disciplines. The aim of this scoping review was to map the evidence related to the inpatient experience of care for CMC and their families, particularly related to key aspects and methodological approaches, and identify gaps that warrant further study.

METHODS

This scoping review was conducted in accordance with JBI methodology and included all studies that reported experiences of acute hospital care for CMC/families. All study designs were included. Databases searched included EMBASE, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Web of Science, MEDLINE(R) and APA PsycInfo from 2000 to 2022. Details about the participants, concepts, study methods and key findings were abstracted using a data abstraction tool. A thematic analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Forty-nine papers were included: 27 qualitative studies, 10 quantitative studies, six mixed methods studies, two descriptive studies and four reviews. Some quantitative studies used validated instruments to measure experience of care, but many used non-validated surveys. There were a few interventional studies with a small sample size. Results of thematic analysis described the importance of negotiating care roles, shared decision-making, common goal setting, relationship-building, communication, sharing expertise and the hospital setting itself.

CONCLUSION

CMC and families value relational elements of care and partnering through sharing expertise, decision-making and collaborative goal-setting when admitted to hospital.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

This review was conducted in alignment with the principles of patient and family engagement. The review was conceptualized, co-designed and conducted with the full engagement of the project's parent-partner. This team member was involved in all stages from constructing the review question, to developing the protocol, screening articles and drafting this manuscript.

Discussion of Spirituality in Family Conferences of Infants With Neurologic Conditions

INTRODUCTION

Spirituality serves as a mechanism to understand and cope with serious illness, yet little is known about how families and clinicians incorporate spirituality in pediatric family conferences.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to characterize the frequency and nature of spiritual statements in conferences between families and clinicians caring for infants with neurologic conditions.

METHODS

In this descriptive qualitative study, we used an existing dataset of audio-recorded, de-identified, transcribed family conferences of infants with neurologic conditions. Inclusion criteria for infants were 1) age < 1 year, 2) presence of a neurologic condition, and 3) planned conversation about neurologic prognosis or goals of care. We used a content analysis approach to code the data.

RESULTS

68 family conferences were held for 24 infants and 36 parents. Most parents (n = 32/36, 89%) self-identified as spiritual. References to spirituality occurred in the 32% of conferences (n = 22/68). Spiritual discussion included three domains: 1) Spiritual beliefs and practices, 2) Spiritual support, and 3) Parent-child connection as sacred. Clinicians' responses to family member spiritual statements were inconsistent and included providing affirmation, exploring goals of care, and continuing discussion of clinical information.

CONCLUSIONS

Spirituality was discussed in approximately one-third of family conferences. Clinician engagement with spirituality discussion was variable. These findings highlight a need for training on when and how to discuss spirituality in conversations with families of seriously ill infants.

Spiritual Care in PICUs: A U.S. Survey of 245 Training Fellows 2020-2021

OBJECTIVES

To understand the perspectives of pediatric fellows training in critical care subspecialties about providing spiritual care.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey of United States National Residency Matching Program pediatric fellows training in critical care specialties.

SETTING

Online survey open from April to May 2021.

SUBJECTS

A total of 720 fellows (165 cardiology, 259 critical care, and 296 neonatology) were contacted, with a response rate of 245 of 720 (34%).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We assessed fellows' survey responses about spiritual care in neonatal and pediatric critical care units. Categorical data were compared using chi-square test or Fisher exact tests. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the percentage correct on ten multiple-choice questions about world religions. Free-text responses were independently coded by two research investigators. A total of 203 of 245 (83%) responding fellows had never received training about spiritual care and 176 of 245 (72%) indicated that they would be likely to incorporate spiritual care into their practice if they received training. Prior training was associated with increased familiarity with a framework for taking a spiritual history ( p < 0.001) and increased knowledge of spiritual practices that could influence medical care ( p = 0.03). Prior training was also associated with increased self-reported frequency of taking a spiritual history ( p < 0.001) and comfort in referring families to spiritual care resources ( p = 0.02). Lack of time and training were the most reported barriers to providing spiritual care.

CONCLUSIONS

Providing spiritual care for families is important in critical care settings. In 2020-2021, in the United States, 245 pediatric critical care fellows responded to a survey about spiritual care in their practice and reported that they lacked training in this subject. An opportunity exists to implement spiritual care curricula into pediatric fellowship training.

Being a "Good Parent" to a NICU Infant With a Major Congenital Anomaly

BACKGROUND

In the United States, up to one-third of infants with a congenital anomaly require neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) hospitalization. Parents of these infants may have different decision-making priorities, which may be influenced by the timing of the infant's diagnosis.

PURPOSE

(1) To compare the ranked importance of decision-making beliefs for parents of infants who received a prenatal versus postnatal congenital diagnosis and (2) explore how parents describe their decision-making beliefs.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, sequential mixed-methods pilot design was applied to collect quantitative data using the Good Parent Ranking Exercise and further explore parents' decision-making beliefs through qualitative interviews. Maximum difference scaling/hierarchical Bayes estimation and content analysis were used to analyze the quantitative and qualitative data, respectively.

RESULTS

Forty mothers completed the Good Parent Ranking Exercise and 20 mothers completed qualitative interviews. Four of the top 5 ranked parenting beliefs were shared by mothers in the prenatal and postnatal groups. Mothers in the postnatal group ranked "focusing on my child's quality of life" higher. Qualitative interviews revealed that previously identified decision-making beliefs were consistent in this NICU parent population, with 1 additional belief identified. Mixed-methods analysis revealed high concordance between the prenatal and postnatal groups.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

NICU nurses need to know that decision-making beliefs for parents who receive a prenatal versus postnatal congenital diagnosis, while largely similar, may have differences.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

Future research should explore decision-making beliefs in demographically diverse parent groups (ie, fathers, partnered vs nonpartnered couples) and effective strategies for promoting NICU parents' decision-making beliefs.

Implementing Spiritual Care in the Pediatric Complex Care Clinic

A project integrated a Clinical Pastoral Education Fellow into a clinic designed to treat children with medical complexity (CMC). The integration of a chaplain into the care team fulfilled the goal of increasing accessibility to spiritual care through a quality improvement project and seemed to positively affect patients and the interdisciplinary team itself. These efforts demonstrate the need for research to better understand the relationship between spiritual screenings, interventions, and outcomes for CMC patients.

[Announcing treatment resistance in pediatric oncology: A qualitative study of nurses' experiences]

INTRODUCTION

The announcement of treatment resistance is a key moment in the management of children treated for cancer. Although nurses are present at various stages of this announcement, few studies have examined their role and experience. This study proposes to enhance understanding of the experience of nurses at this time of the pediatric cancer trajectory in France.

METHOD

A qualitative study was conducted in two pediatric oncology departments. Semi-structured research interviews were conducted with seven pediatric nurses (five women) with an average age of 36.9 years.

RESULTS

Nurses report not being systematically present during announcements of treatment resistance but being present with the families before and after these announcements. Nurses described their role at this point in the management process as multifaceted. The emotional burden associated with these announcements is significant: nurses must manage their own emotions when faced with the discovery of resistance to treatment, those of the families, and must often answer difficult questions about the prognosis or end of life. In this context, teamwork is an important support.

DISCUSSION

Better awareness and recognition of the role of nurses and the associated emotional burden would enable them to fully carry out their missions.

Forming Clinician-Parent Therapeutic Alliance for Children With Severe Neurologic Impairment

OBJECTIVES

Care for children with severe neurologic impairment (SNI) often involves complex medical decision-making where therapeutic alliance between clinicians and families is essential. Yet, existing data suggest that communication and alliance are often lacking. This study aimed to examine aspects important to developing therapeutic alliance between clinicians and parents of children with SNI.

METHODS

A purposive sample of expert clinicians and parents of children with SNI completed brief demographic surveys and 1:1 semistructured interviews between July 2019 and August 2020 at a single tertiary pediatric academic center. Interviews focused on the inpatient experience and transcriptions underwent thematic analysis by a study team of qualitative researchers with expertise in palliative care and communication science.

RESULTS

Twenty-five parents and 25 clinicians participated (total n = 50). Many parents were mothers (n = 17, 68%) of school-aged children with congenital/chromosomal conditions (n = 15, 65%). Clinicians represented 8 professions and 15 specialties. Responses from participants suggested 3 major themes that build and sustain therapeutic alliance including: (1) foundational factors that must exist to establish rapport; (2) structural factors that provide awareness of the parent/child experience; and (3) weathering factors that comprise the protection, security, and additional support during hard or uncertain times. Participants also shared concrete actions that promote these factors in clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

Therapeutic alliance between clinicians and parents of children with SNI consists of at least 3 factors that support communication and medical decision-making. These factors are facilitated by concrete actions and practices, which enhance communication about the care for children with SNI.

The role of religion and spirituality in caregiver decision-making about tracheostomy for children with medical complexity

Children with medical complexity (CMC) receive life-sustaining treatments such as tracheostomy. The objective of this paper is to explore the roles of religion and spirituality (R&S) of caregivers of children with medical complexity (CMC) in their decision to pursue tracheostomy for their children. We conducted 41 in-depth interviews of caregivers of CMC who had received tracheostomies in the prior 5 years. Four themes emerged: (1) Caregivers believed R&S to be powerful for their children's healing, and helped them cope with their children's illnesses; (2) Spirituality was an important factor for caregivers in the decision to pursue tracheostomy for their children; (3) Many caregivers did not discuss their spirituality with clinicians for a variety of reasons; (4) Clergy and hospital chaplains played a major supportive role overall; however, they did not play a significant role in the decision-making process. Our study shows the importance of R&S, and the roles of clergy and chaplains in pediatric tracheostomy decision-making.

Clinical Care Strategies That Support Parents of Children With Complex Chronic Conditions

OBJECTIVES

Children with complex chronic conditions often receive inpatient and end-of-life care in the ICU, yet little is known about the clinical care strategies that best support this unique group of parents. This study aimed to elucidate supportive clinical care strategies identified by bereaved parents of children with complex chronic conditions.

DESIGN

Qualitative analysis of 21 open-response items from the cross-sectional "Survey of Caring for Children with Complex Chronic Conditions" querying communication, decision-making, and end-of-life experiences.

SETTING

Large tertiary care children's hospital.

PATIENTS

Parents of children with complex chronic conditions who received care at a large academic institution and died between 2006 and 2015.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

An iterative multistage thematic analysis of responses was used to identify key themes pertaining to clinical care strategies that support parents of children with complex chronic conditions. Open-ended responses were analyzed from 110 of 114 (96%) of survey respondents. The majority of parents had children with congenital/chromosomal complex chronic conditions who died 3.9 years (interquartile range, 2.2-6.7 yr) prior to their parents' study participation. Although informational themes related to clear honest communication, consistent messaging, and enhanced care coordination were identified, parents emphasized the relational aspects of clinical care including inclusivity of their expertise about their child's needs, recognition of their unique experience as parents, and maintenance of connection with clinicians through bereavement.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical care strategies that support parents of children with complex chronic conditions reflect the unique needs of this group of children. Relational strategies such as including parents as experts in their child's care were paramount to parents of children with complex chronic conditions throughout their child's medical journey and at end of life.

The physician-nurse collaboration in truth disclosure: from nurses' perspective

BACKGROUND

Collaboration between physicians and nurses is critical. However, a limited number of studies have provided insights into the status of physician-nurse collaboration in truth disclosure.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted using an electronic questionnaire among Chinese nurses who attended a provincial conference. The Nurse-Physician Collaboration Scale was administered to nurses to assess the collaboration in truth disclosure from their perspective. A multiple-choice question was asked to assess the perceived difficulties in truth disclosure. Descriptive statistics, univariate, and multiple stepwise regression analyses were performed to evaluate physician-nurse collaboration in truth disclosure.

RESULTS

A total of 287 nurses completed the survey, and 279 of them reported that they had carried out truth disclosures among patients. The average score for physician-nurse collaboration in truth disclosure was 3.98 ± 0.72. The majority of nurses (73.1-81%) responded positively to different dimensions of collaboration in truth disclosure. The results of multiple stepwise regression analysis showed that seniority (B = - 0.111, 95% confidence interval [CI] = - 0.167-- 0.055, p < 0.001) and frequency of truth disclosure (B = 0.162, 95%CI = 0.076-0.249, p < 0.001) were the only two factors associated with collaboration in truth disclosure between physicians and nurses. The most common barrier perceived by nurses was fear of patients' negative emotions or their suicide attempts after truth telling.

CONCLUSIONS

Most nurses responded positively to physician-nurse collaboration in truth disclosure. Various difficulties existed in the practice of truth-telling collaboration. Further studies are required to test the potential interventions to promote cooperation between nurses and physicians in truth disclosure.

Hope-Colored Glasses: Perceptions of Prognosis Among Pediatric Oncology Patients and Their Parents

PURPOSE

Cancer patients' belief about prognosis can heavily influence medical decision making and goals of care. It is known that parents of children with cancer tend to be optimistic regarding their child's prognosis; however, little is known about pediatric patients' prognostic beliefs, how physicians' prognostic communication is perceived, and how these perceptions are compared with actual prognoses.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An original survey was administered to 100 pediatric oncology patients, age 10-18 years, and their parents from 2013 to 2015, at St Jude Children's Research Hospital. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they had an oncologic diagnosis, were between 1 month and 1 year from diagnosis, and were English speaking. Survey responses regarding perceived prognosis were compared with actual prognoses as determined from the medical record review and published literature. Analysis included descriptive statistics and association tests.

RESULTS

Nearly half of participants (patients = 48.9%, parents = 50.5%) displayed prognostic optimism as compared with the determined objective estimate of curative potential. The majority of both patients (78%) and parents (85%) reported belief in a very high chance of cure, although fewer reported that their physician communicated a very high chance for cure (patients = 57%, parents = 70%), and only 43% were determined to have a very high probability of cure. Significant differences were noted in prognostic optimism by cancer type (P < .0001); patients with solid tumor were more often optimistic (n = 25, 83.3% optimistic; n = 5, 16.7% accurate), and patients with lymphoma were most often accurate (n = 2, 8.7% optimistic; n = 21, 91.3% accurate).

CONCLUSION

Pediatric oncology patients and parents tend to be optimistic about their chance of cure, as compared to both perceived prognostic communication from physicians and objective estimated prognosis. Understanding the nature of prognostic optimism among patients with cancer and caregivers may empower clinicians to guide realistic decision making while supporting hope.

Consulting with a folk deity before making decisions: spiritual practices in parents facing end-of-life decisions for their child on life support with brain stem dysfunction

Background

Adolescents with brain stem dysfunction may undergo many invasive treatments, and parents are often faced with making the decision to withdraw treatment. However, in the face of their child’s death, the spiritual practices of parents dealing with end-of-life decision-making remain under investigated.

Purpose

This study explores the spiritual practices in parents making end-of-life decisions for adolescents on life support with brain stem dysfunction.

Method

A descriptive phenomenological study was conducted through in-depth interviews with three parents of two adolescents in Taiwan. Data were analysed using Colaizzi’s seven-step protocol.

Results

Three main themes emerged: (1) faith during decision-making, (2) struggles during decision-making, (3) transformation during decision-making. The findings indicate that “transforming the nature of hope” is the essence of the experience.

Conclusion

Family-centred care, gaining insight into parental spiritual practices, and developing culturally-appropriate care are recommended.

The family's adaptation process to their child's hospitalization in an Intensive Care Unit

OBJECTIVE

To learn about the adaptation process of family members when experiencing their child's hospitalization in an Intensive Care Unit.

METHOD

A qualitative, descriptive and exploratory study conducted at the Pediatrics Unit with family members of children from the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. The thematic analysis technique was used.

RESULTS

Thirteen (13) family members, 12 mothers and one father participated. The following categories emerged from the results: Family impact on children's hospitalization in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit and Mechanisms for adapting family members to hospitalization in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

CONCLUSION

The mechanisms adopted by the family in the process of adapting the child to admission to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit were: positive thinking, understanding the treatment and the operation of the unit. Health professionals can offer strategies to the family in order to make hospitalization less traumatic, making it possible to share experiences and expand the knowledge of those involved.

Caregiver experiences of paediatric inpatient cardiac services: A qualitative systematic review

BACKGROUND

Advances in paediatric care have contributed to an increasing survival of children with complex heart disease. Yet, life-saving management demands prolonged inpatient admissions, which contribute to emotional and psychological distress for parents and other caregivers in a role of main custody.

AIM

The purpose of this study was to identify, appraise and synthesise qualitative studies exploring caregivers' experiences of paediatric inpatient cardiac services, generating an understanding of their needs in hospital and informing priorities for change in healthcare delivery.

METHODS

Searches were conducted in Medline, Allied and Complimentary Medicine Database, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, EMCARE, Scopus, PsychINFO, Proquest, OpenGrey and ETHOs from 2008-2019, reflecting recent advances in cardiac healthcare. Articles were selected using predetermined eligibility criteria dictating qualitative inquiry into caregiver perspectives whilst their child received hospital-based interventions for heart disease. All eligible studies underwent quality appraisal. Framework synthesis was used to analyse and summarise findings.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies involving 689 caregivers from 11 countries were included. Three overarching themes were identified: 'emotional capacity to care', 'practicalities of caring', and 'the bigger picture of caring'.

CONCLUSIONS

Through analysis and summary of qualitative primary research, this review captures the emotional challenges that caregivers face and practicalities of undertaking a caregiver role, whilst looking after their child with heart disease in hospital. The results widen the context of the caregiver role, encompassing the whole family unit beyond the hospital environment. This review exposes the impact of these challenges on caregiver competence, wellbeing and attachment to their unwell child, informing priorities for development of family-centred paediatric inpatient cardiac services.

Impact of Pediatric Critical Illness and Injury on Families: An Updated Systematic Review

PROBLEM

Pediatric ICUs (PICU) that have adopted family-centered care models welcome families to the critically ill child's bedside to partner with clinicians in decision-making and the provision of care. The aim of this review was to synthesize the evidence on the impact of critical illness and injury on families of children admitted to the PICU to identify research needs in pediatric critical care.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

This systematic review included quantitative and qualitative studies that examined the experiences of families of children admitted to a PICU published between 2005 and 2019.

SAMPLE

33 articles were selected for inclusion in the final analysis after screening those identified by searches in CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, and reference lists of included publications.

RESULTS

Main parental stressors included the sights and sounds within the PICU, child acuity, changes to family functioning and parenting role, and uncertainty of the child's outcome. The most common need of parents was to be well-informed. Psychological, physical, and social impact of hospitalization were experienced by parents from days after admission to years after discharge. Spirituality was identified as a coping mechanism in half of the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents experience negative effects of the ill child's admission to the PICU and to PICU exposure.

IMPLICATIONS

Careful consideration of the impact of the PICU admission on family members of critically ill or injured children is needed when implementing family-centered care strategies. Future research on other family members including the healthy sibling needs to be conducted.

The Influence of Parents' Religiosity or Spirituality on Decision Making for Their Critically Ill Child: An Integrative Review

Background: Religion and/or spirituality are important values for many parents of critically ill children; however, how religion and/or spirituality may influence which treatments parents accept or decline for their child, or how they respond to significant events during their child's illness treatment, remains unclear. Objective: To summarize the literature related to the influence of parents' religiosity or spirituality on decision making for their critically ill child. Design: Integrative review, using the Whittemore and Knafl approach. Setting/Subjects: Data were collected from studies identified through PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL plus), Embase, Scopus, and PsychInfo. Databases were searched to identify literature published between 1996 and 2016. Results: Twenty-four articles of variable methodological quality met inclusion criteria. Analysis generated three themes: parents' religiosity or spirituality as (1) guidance during decision making, (2) comfort and support during the decision-making process, and (3) a source of meaning, purpose, and connectedness in the experience of decision making. Conclusion: This review suggests that parents' religiosity and/or spirituality is an important and primarily positive influence on their decision making for a critically ill child.

Parental Perspectives on Roles in End-of-Life Decision Making in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: An Integrative Review

PROBLEM

Little is known about how parents perceive their role or the role of health care providers (HCPs) during end-of-life decision making (EOL DM) in the context of the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

The authors searched CINAHL, PubMed, Ovid Medline, Web of Science, Social Science Database, PsycINFO, and Google scholar for English language studies performed in the United States related to parental perception of parental or HCP roles in EOL DM in the PICU since 2008.

SAMPLE

Eleven studies of parents and health care providers (HCPs) of critically ill children in the PICU and/or receiving inpatient pediatric palliative care, and bereaved parents of PICU patients.

RESULTS

Most parents reported belief that EOL DM is within the domain of parental role, a minority felt it was a physician's responsibility. Parental EOL DM is rooted more firmly in emotion and perception and a desire to be a 'good parent' to a child at EOL in the way they see fit than HCP recommendations or 'medical facts'. Parents need HCPs to treat them as allies, communicate well, and be trustworthy.

CONCLUSIONS

Role conflict may exist between parents and HCPs who are prioritizing different attributes of the parental role. The role of the nurse in support of parental role in the PICU is not well-elucidated in the extant literature.

IMPLICATIONS

Future research should focus on what parents need from HCPs, especially nurses, to support their parental role, and factors that facilitate the development of trust and good communication.

We don't need unilateral DNRs: taking informed non-dissent one step further

Although shared decision-making is a standard in medical care, unilateral decisions through process-based conflict resolution policies have been defended in certain cases. In patients who do not stand to receive proportional clinical benefits, the harms involved in interventions such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation seem to run contrary to the principle of non-maleficence, and provision of such interventions may cause clinicians significant moral distress. However, because the application of these policies involves taking choices out of the domain of shared decision-making, they face important ethical and legal problems, including a recent challenge to their constitutionality. In light of these concerns, we suggest a re-conceptualization of informed non-dissent as an alternative approach in cases where the application of process-based policies is being considered. This clinician-directed communication model still preserves what is valuable in such policies and salvages professional integrity, while minimising ethical and legal challenges.

Pediatric oncology nurses' perceptions of prognosis-related communication

BACKGROUND

Disclosure of prognosis-related information is an essential aspect of communication with pediatric patients with cancer and their families. The nurse is believed to play an important role in this process, but nurse perceptions and experiences have not been well-described.

PURPOSE

Provide an exploration of pediatric oncology nurses' experiences with prognosis-related communication (PRC).

METHOD

Mixed-methods, multiphase design. This paper highlights the qualitative portion of the study.

FINDINGS

Three themes were identified: Importance of collaboration, impact of PRC, and delivery of prognostic information.

DISCUSSION

Collaboration is a critical element of PRC. Nurses are often not included in the disclosure process, which limits the ability of nurses to fully function in their roles, compromising patient, family, and nurse outcomes. A paradigm shift is required to empower nurses to be more active participants. More education of physicians and nurses is necessary to consistently engage nurses in PRC and prepare nurses for critical conversations.

The experience of grandparents of children hospitalized in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

OBJECTIVE

To understand the experience of grandparents of children hospitalized in pediatric intensive care units.

METHOD

This was a qualitative study based on the symbolic interactionism theoretical framework and the grounded theory as methodological framework carried out with grandparents of children hospitalized in the pediatric intensive care unit of a teaching hospital in a city in the state of São Paulo. Data were collected by means of participatory observation and semi-structured interviews, and analyzed following the open and axial codification stages of grounded theory.

RESULTS

Nine grandparents were interviewed. Two phenomena were identified: "finding themselves inside a storm" and "fighting to be the anchor of the family", which explain the suffering experienced and support role developed by grandparents during the hospitalization period.

CONCLUSION

Grandparents develop an important family support role during the crisis. Therefore, family care strategies must be developed to include this generation of the family, who are increasingly present and participatory in several healthcare settings.

Exploring the vagueness of Religion & Spirituality in complex pediatric decision-making: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Medical advances have led to new challenges in decision-making for parents of seriously ill children. Many parents say religion and spirituality (R&S) influence their decisions, but the mechanism and outcomes of this influence are unknown. Health care providers (HCPs) often feel unprepared to discuss R&S with parents or address conflicts between R&S beliefs and clinical recommendations. Our study sought to illuminate the influence of R&S on parental decision-making and explore how HCPs interact with parents for whom R&S are important.

METHODS

A longitudinal, qualitative, descriptive design was used to (1) identify R&S factors affecting parental decision-making, (2) observe changes in R&S themes over time, and (3) learn about HCP perspectives on parental R&S. The study sample included 16 cases featuring children with complex life-threatening conditions. The length of study for each case varied, ranging in duration from 8 to 531 days (median = 380, mean = 324, SD = 174). Data from each case included medical records and sets of interviews conducted at least monthly with mothers (n = 16), fathers (n = 12), and HCPs (n = 108). Thematic analysis was performed on 363 narrative interviews to identify R&S themes and content related to decision-making.

RESULTS

Parents from 13 cases reported R&S directly influenced decision-making. Most HCPs were unaware of this influence. Fifteen R&S themes appeared in parent and HCP transcripts. Themes most often associated with decision-making were Hope & Faith, God is in Control, Miracles, and Prayer. Despite instability in the child's condition, these themes remained consistently relevant across the trajectory of illness. R&S influenced decisions about treatment initiation, procedures, and life-sustaining therapy, but the variance in effect of R&S on parents' choices ultimately depended upon other medical & non-medical factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents consider R&S fundamental to decision-making, but apply R&S concepts in vague ways, suggesting R&S impact how decisions are made more than what decisions are made. Lack of clarity in parental expressions of R&S does not necessarily indicate insincerity or underestimation of the seriousness of the child's prognosis; R&S can be applied to decision-making in both functional and dysfunctional ways. We present three models of how religious and spiritual vagueness functions in parental decision-making and suggest clinical applications.

Ethical, Cultural, Social, and Individual Considerations Prior to Transition to Limitation or Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Therapies

As part of the invited supplement on Death and Dying in the PICU, we reviewed ethical, cultural, and social considerations for the bedside healthcare practitioner prior to engaging with children and families in decisions about limiting therapies, withholding, or withdrawing therapies in a PICU. Clarifying beliefs and values is a necessary prerequisite to approaching these conversations. Striving for medical consensus is important. Discussion, reflection, and ethical analysis may determine a range of views that may reasonably be respected if professional disagreements persist. Parental decisional support is recommended and should incorporate their information needs, perceptions of medical uncertainty, child's condition, and their role as a parent. Child's involvement in decision making should be considered, but may not be possible. Culturally attuned care requires early examination of cultural perspectives before misunderstandings or disagreements occur. Societal influences may affect expectations and exploration of such may help frame discussions. Hospital readiness for support of social media campaigns is recommended. Consensus with family on goals of care is ideal as it addresses all parties' moral stance and diminishes the risk for superseding one group's value judgments over another. Engaging additional supportive services early can aid with understanding or resolving disagreement. There is wide variation globally in ethical permissibility, cultural, and societal influences that impact the clinician, child, and parents. Thoughtful consideration to these issues when approaching decisions about limitation or withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies will help to reduce emotional, spiritual, and ethical burdens, minimize misunderstanding for all involved, and maximize high-quality care delivery.

Family-Centered Care From the Perspective of Parents of Children Cared for in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: An Integrative Review

PROBLEM

The Institute for Patient- and Family-Centered Care's (IPFCC) definition of family-centered care (FCC) includes the following four core concepts: respect and dignity, information sharing, participation, and collaboration. To date, research has focused on the provider experience of FCC in the PICU; little is known about how parents of children hospitalized in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) experience FCC.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Articles were included if they were published between 2006 and 2016, included qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods results, related to care received in a PICU, and included results that were from a parent perspective.

SAMPLE

49 articles from 44 studies were included in this review; 32 used qualitative/mixed methods and 17 used quantitative designs.

RESULTS

The concepts of respect and dignity, information sharing, and participation were well represented in the literature, as parents reported having both met and unmet needs in relation to FCC. While not explicitly defined in the IPFCC core concepts, parents frequently reported on the environment of care and its impact on their FCC experience.

CONCLUSIONS

As evidenced by this synthesis, parents of critically ill children report both positive and negative FCC experiences relating to the core concepts outlined by the IPFCC.

IMPLICATIONS

There is a need for better understanding of how parents perceive their involvement in the care of their critically ill child, additionally; the IPFCC core concepts should be refined to explicitly include the importance of the environment of care.

Emerging Methodologies in Pediatric Palliative Care Research: Six Case Studies

Given the broad focus of pediatric palliative care (PPC) on the physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of children with potentially life-limiting illnesses and their families, PPC research requires creative methodological approaches. This manuscript, written by experienced PPC researchers, describes issues encountered in our own areas of research and the novel methods we have identified to target them. Specifically, we discuss potential approaches to: assessing symptoms among nonverbal children, evaluating medical interventions, identifying and treating problems related to polypharmacy, addressing missing data in longitudinal studies, evaluating longer-term efficacy of PPC interventions, and monitoring for inequities in PPC service delivery.

Addressing spirituality during critical illness: A review of current literature

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of research on spirituality and religiosity in the intensive care setting that has been published since the 2004-2005 American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Support of Family in the Patient-Centered Intensive Care Unit with an emphasis on its application beyond palliative and end-of-life care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

ACCM 2004-2005 guidelines emphasized the importance of spiritual and religious support in the form of four specific recommendations: [1] assessment and incorporation of spiritual needs in ICU care plan; [2] spiritual care training for doctors and nurses; [3] physician review of interdisciplinary spiritual need assessments; and [4] honoring the requests of patients to pray with them. We reviewed 26 studies published from 2006 to 2016 and identified whether studies strengthened the grade of these recommendations. We further categorized findings of these studies to understand the roles of spirituality and religiosity in surrogate perceptions and decision-making and patient and family experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Spiritual care has an essential role in the treatment of critically ill patients and families. Current literature offers few insights to support clinicians in navigating this often-challenging aspect of patient care and more research is needed.

How Parents of Children With Cancer Learn About Their Children's Prognosis

OBJECTIVES

To determine which prognostic information sources parents find informative and which are associated with better parental understanding of prognosis.

METHODS

Prospective, questionnaire-based cohort study of parents and physicians of children with cancer at 2 academic pediatric hospitals. We asked parents how they learned about prognoses and evaluated relationships between information sources and prognostic understanding, defined as accuracy versus optimism. We excluded parents with pessimistic estimates and whose children had such good prognoses that optimism relative to the physician was impossible. Analytic cohort of 256 parent-physician pairs.

RESULTS

Most parents considered explicit sources (conversations with oncologists at diagnosis, day-to-day conversations with oncologists, and conversations with nurses) "very" or "extremely" informative (73%-85%). Implicit sources (parent's sense of how child was doing or how oncologist seemed to feel child was doing) were similarly informative (84%-87%). Twenty-seven percent (70/253) of parents reported prognostic estimates matching physicians' estimates. Parents who valued implicit information had lower prognostic accuracy (odds ratio [OR] 0.50; 95% confidence interval 0.29-0.88), especially those who relied on a "general sense of how my child's oncologist seems to feel my child is doing" (OR 0.47; 0.22-0.99). Parents were more likely to use implicit sources if they reported receiving high-quality prognostic information (OR 3.02; 1.41-6.43), trusted the physician (OR 2.01; 1.01-3.98), and reported high-quality physician communication (OR 1.81; 1.00-3.27).

CONCLUSIONS

Reliance on implicit sources was associated with overly-optimistic prognostic estimates. Parents who endorsed strong, trusting relationships with physicians were not protected against misinformation.

Parental expectations of support from healthcare providers during pediatric life-threatening illness: A secondary, qualitative analysis

PURPOSES

To explain parental expectations of support from healthcare providers for their parenting roles and goals during a child's life-threatening illness (LTI).

DESIGN AND METHODS

Qualitative interpretive study guided by the Family Adjustment and Adaptation Response Model. Thematic analyses were conducted with data from 31 semi-structured interviews of parents of children with LTI using systematic strategies to ensure rigor including audit trails and prolonged engagement.

RESULTS

We identified three themes and one meta-theme or overall theme: (1) "Help us survive this," (2) "Let's fight together: please fight with me, not against me, to care for my family," and (3) "Guide me through the darkness: I am suffering." Overall, the parents conveyed that they expect mutuality with the health care providers and system in order to keep Fighting together for my family survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In the daily work of caring for their families, parents of children with LTI consider survival on multiple levels. They consider the life, illness, and potential death of one child while considering the on-going survival and sustenance of family relationships.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Parents are distressed and grapple with conflicted feelings about managing competing needs of various family members. Relationships with health care providers can influence parents' management of the situation and be a source of support as their parenting role changes over the illness trajectory, time, and in response to adversity.

Religion and Spiritual Care in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Parental Attitudes Regarding Physician Spiritual and Religious Inquiry

OBJECTIVE

Parents of seriously ill children require attention to their spiritual needs, especially during end-of-life care. The objective of this study was to characterize parental attitudes regarding physician inquiry into their belief system. Materials and Main Results: A total of 162 surveys from parents of children hospitalized for >48 hours in pediatric intensive care unit in a tertiary academic medical center were analyzed. Forty-nine percent of all respondents and 62% of those who identified themselves as moderate to very spiritual or religious stated that their beliefs influenced the decisions they made about their child's medical care. Although 34% of all respondents would like their physician to ask about their spiritual or religious beliefs, 48% would desire such enquiry if their child was seriously ill. Those who identified themselves as moderate to very spiritual or religious were most likely to welcome the discussion ( P < .001). Two-thirds of the respondents would feel comforted to know that their child's physician prayed for their child. One-third of all respondents would feel very comfortable discussing their beliefs with a physician, whereas 62% would feel very comfortable having such discussions with a chaplain.

CONCLUSION

The study findings suggest parental ambivalence when it comes to discussing their spiritual or religious beliefs with their child's physicians. Given that improved understanding of parental spiritual and religious beliefs may be important in the decision-making process, incorporation of the expertise of professional spiritual care providers may provide the optimal context for enhanced parent-physician collaboration in the care of the critically ill child.