Returning Adolescents to Driving after Sports-Related Concussions: What Influences Physician Decision-Making

R2DRV: study protocol for longitudinal assessment of driving after mild TBI in young drivers

BACKGROUND

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and traffic-related injuries are two major public health problems disproportionately affecting young people. Young drivers, whose driving skills are still developing, are particularly vulnerable to impaired driving due to brain injuries. Despite this, there is a paucity of research on how mTBI impacts driving and when it is safe to return to drive after an mTBI. This paper describes the protocol of the study, R2DRV, Longitudinal Assessment of Driving After Mild TBI in Young Drivers, which examines the trajectory of simulated driving performance and self-reported driving behaviors from acutely post-injury to symptom resolution among young drivers with mTBI compared to matched healthy drivers. Additionally, this study investigates the associations of acute post-injury neurocognitive function and cognitive load with driving among young drivers with and without mTBI.

METHODS

A total of 200 young drivers (ages 16 to 24) are enrolled from two study sites, including 100 (50 per site) with a physician-confirmed isolated mTBI, along with 100 (50 per site) healthy drivers without a history of TBI matched 1:1 for age, sex, driving experience, and athlete status. The study assesses primary driving outcomes using two approaches: (1) high-fidelity driving simulators to evaluate driving performance across four experimental study conditions at multiple time points (within 96 h of injury and weekly until symptom resolution or 8 weeks post-injury); (2) daily self-report surveys on real-world driving behaviors completed by all participants.

DISCUSSION

This study will fill critical knowledge gaps by longitudinally assessing driving performance and behaviors in young drivers with mTBI, as compared to matched healthy drivers, from acutely post-injury to symptom resolution. The research strategy enables evaluating how increased cognitive load may exacerbate the effects of mTBI on driving, and how post-mTBI neurocognitive deficits may impact the driving ability of young drivers. Findings will be shared through scientific conferences, peer-reviewed journals, and media outreach to care providers and the public.

Sensory sensitivity after acquired brain injury: A systematic review

Patients with acquired brain injury frequently report experiencing sensory stimuli as abnormally under- (sensory hyposensitivity) or overwhelming (sensory hypersensitivity). Although they can negatively impact daily functioning, these symptoms are poorly understood. To provide an overview of the current evidence on atypical sensory sensitivity after acquired brain injury, we conducted a systematic literature review. The primary aim of the review was to investigate the behavioural and neural mechanisms that are associated with self-reported sensory sensitivity. Studies were included when they studied sensory sensitivity in acquired brain injury populations, and excluded when they were not written in English, consisted of non-empirical research, did not study human subjects, studied pain, related sensory sensitivity to peripheral injury or studied patients with a neurodegenerative disorder, meningitis, encephalitis or a brain tumour. The Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for appropriate studies. A qualitative synthesis of the results of the 81 studies that were included suggests that abnormal sensory thresholds and a reduced information processing speed are candidate behavioural mechanisms of atypical subjective sensory sensitivity after acquired brain injury. Furthermore, there was evidence for an association between subjective sensory sensitivity and structural grey or white matter abnormalities, and to functional abnormalities in sensory cortices. However, further research is needed to explore the causation of atypical sensory sensitivity. In addition, there is a need for the development of adequate diagnostic tools. This can significantly advance the quantity and quality of research on the prevalence, aetiology, prognosis and treatment of these symptoms.

A Cross-Sectional Decision-Making Approach to Inform Neuropsychological Battery Development in Professional Hockey

OBJECTIVE

Neuropsychologists commonly use a large battery of tests to inform clinical decisions. Decision analysis can be used to determine which individual tests play a role in the decision-making process. The objective of this project was to conduct quantitative and qualitative decision analysis of decisions by team neuropsychologists with professional hockey players being evaluated as part of the National Hockey League (NHL)/NHL Players Association Concussion Protocol.

METHOD

We extracted neuropsychological data from an NHL clinical program database. Team neuropsychologists evaluated concussed players using a hybrid neuropsychological test battery. The neuropsychologists then determined whether players were experiencing concussion-related cognitive difficulties. Logistic regression was used to examine which tests accounted for unique variance in the decision-making process. We also conducted a survey of NHL neuropsychologists, asking them to rate the usefulness of each test in the battery.

RESULTS

Five of the fifteen measures accounted for unique variance in team neuropsychologists' decisions, including the ImPACT Verbal Memory Composite, Visual Motor Composite, Reaction Time Composite, Symptom Score, and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised Delayed Recall. Notable discrepancies were uncovered between quantitative indications of usefulness and self-reported qualitative perceptions of test usefulness when making decisions. Qualitatively, clinicians reported that the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, ImPACT Reaction Time, and Color Trails 2 were the most useful tests when making decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Along with validation studies, decision analysis can be used as part of a comprehensive evaluation process to inform the development of best-practice batteries for use among athletes with sports concussion.

Changes in Driving Behaviors After Concussion in Adolescents

PURPOSE

Although return to learn, exercise, and sports have evidence-based guidelines, there is limited research investigating return to driving after concussion. The purpose was to characterize and compare adolescent driving behaviors after concussion.

METHODS

Using the Minds Matter Concussion Registry, we queried data of adolescents, aged 16-19 years, diagnosed with a concussion ≤28 days of injury and seen between January 31, 2017 and August 31, 2018 at the specialty care concussion program. Outcomes included patient report of: changes postinjury driving behaviors; Post-Concussion Symptom Inventory; return to school, and exercise and sports. Provider recommendations for return to school after initial clinical assessment were also examined. Descriptive statistics, analysis of covariance, and chi-square tests were performed.

RESULTS

Of the 332 drivers (46.1% female; mean age 17.5 years, 95% confidence interval [CI], 17.4-17.6), 46.9% had returned to driving since injury. Of those who returned to driving, 58.9% reported "Driving with No Changes." The Post-Concussion Symptom Inventory score was higher among "Driving with Changes" (48.7, 95% CI: 42.2-55.2) than "Driving with No Changes" (27.4, 95% CI: 22.3-32.5, p < .01) and "Has Not Driven Since Injury" (42.3, 95% CI: 38.4-46.3, p < .01). Among the 332 drivers, few had returned to exercise (15.4%) or organized sports (6.0%). Of those in school (n = 291), only 8.9% were provider recommended to return to full school days after clinical assessment.

CONCLUSION

Many adolescents continued to drive after concussion, despite not yet having returned to exercise or sport. Nine of 10 were advised to return to school with accommodations to begin a gradual increase in cognitive activity, suggesting a gradual increase in driving may be justified.

Slowed driving-reaction time following concussion-symptom resolution

BACKGROUND

Concussed patients have impaired reaction time (RT) and cognition following injury that may linger and impair driving performance. Limited research has used direct methods to assess driving-RT post-concussion. Our study compared driving RT during simulated scenarios between concussed and control individuals and examined driving-RT's relationship with traditional computerized neurocognitive testing (CNT) domains.

METHODS

We employed a cross-sectional study among 14 concussed (15.9 ± 9.8 days post-concussion, mean ± SD) individuals and 14 healthy controls matched for age, sex, and driving experience. Participants completed a driving simulator and CNT (CNS Vital Signs) assessment within 48 h of symptom resolution. A driving-RT composite (ms) was derived from 3 simulated driving scenarios: stoplight (green to yellow), evasion (avoiding approaching vehicle), and pedestrian (person running in front of vehicle). The CNT domains included verbal and visual memory; CNT-RT (simple-, complex-, Stroop-RT individually); simple and complex attention; motor, psychomotor, and processing speed; executive function; and cognitive flexibility. Independent t tests and Hedge d effect sizes assessed driving-RT differences between groups, Pearson correlations (r) examined driving RT and CNT domain relationships among cohorts separately, and p values were controlled for false discovery rate via Benjamini-Hochberg procedures (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

Concussed participants demonstrated slower driving-RT composite scores than controls (mean difference = 292.86 ms; 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 70.18-515.54; p = 0.023; d = 0.992). Evasion-RT (p = 0.054; d = 0.806), pedestrian-RT (p = 0.258; d = 0.312), and stoplight-RT (p = 0.292; d = 0.585) outcomes were not statistically significant after false-discovery rate corrections but demonstrated medium to large effect sizes for concussed deficits. Among concussed individuals, driving-RT outcomes did not significantly correlate with CNT domains (r-range: -0.51 to 0.55; p > 0.05). No correlations existed between driving-RT outcomes and CNT domains among control participants either (r-range: -0.52 to 0.72; p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Slowed driving-RT composite scores and large effect sizes among concussed individuals when asymptomatic signify lingering impairment and raise driving-safety concerns. Driving-RT and CNT-RT measures correlated moderately but not statistically, which indicates that CNT-RT is not an optimal surrogate for driving RT.

An Integrative Review of Return to Driving After Concussion in Adolescents

Concussion is a common injury among adolescents. It is unknown how a concussion affects driving behavior and performance in adolescents. Although there are guidelines for return to learn, exercise, and sports that school nurses can help support in school, little is known about return to driving after concussion. The goal of this integrative review was to summarize the current literature on return to driving after concussion in adolescents. Six articles published between 2016 and 2020 were included in the review. Physicians and nurse practitioners find providing driving recommendations to adolescents to be appropriate; however, they are unclear what metrics to use to determine whether a patient is fit to drive. Future studies should explore clinical predictors of readiness to return to driving in adolescents. School nurses have an opportunity to support adolescents in their resumption of typical activities after concussion including school, sports, and, as more evidence becomes available, driving.

Outpatient Management of Sport-Related Concussion, Return to Learn, Return to Play

Outpatient sports-related concussion (SRC) management continues to evolve as evidence emerges supporting a multidisciplinary approach to the clinical assessment of SRC. Early active rehabilitation has replaced strict cognitive and physical rest. With this paradigm shift in management, pragmatic approaches are highly sought by busy clinicians that provide direction to individualized treatment, which can potentially expedite symptom resolution. Treatment strategies that address domain-based symptom constellations continue to be developed by clinician researchers. Although the optimal timing and dose of these domain-specific therapies has yet to be determined, future directions of SRC treatment will answer these and other questions regarding SRC management.

Improving Concussion Management by Including Driving Recommendations for Adolescents with Concussions: A Quality Improvement Project

Introduction

Motor vehicle collisions are the leading cause of death in adolescents. A concussion is a common injury sustained by adolescents and may impair their driving abilities during the acute phase of recovery. Healthcare providers do not consistently perform counseling of adolescents regarding driving after a concussion. This quality improvement project's goal was to increase the incidence of primary care sports medicine physicians providing driving recommendations to 75% of adolescents who suffered from concussions.

Methods

Between August 2017 to August 2018, a "smart phrase" implemented in the electronic health record system reminded providers during office visits to provide driving recommendations to patients 15 years old and older who presented to the sports medicine clinic for evaluation of concussion. Performing monthly retrospective chart reviews determined the frequency of patients who received driving recommendations during the initial visit.

Results

We achieved the goal of providing driving recommendations to 75% of concussed patients by the second month. This progress was maintained through the remainder of the year, except for 1 month (December). Forty-three percent of patients with concussions evaluated met inclusion criteria, and of those, 48% were actively driving before their concussion. The most common medical reason for restricting driving was vestibular or ocular dysfunction.

Conclusion

This quality improvement project showed that providing driving instructions to concussion patients by implementing a smart phrase into the electronic health record system was impactful and sustainable.

Post-concussion driving management among athletic trainers

Primary objective: To describe and compare athletic trainer (AT) post-concussion driving management practices and opinions.Research design: Cross-sectional.Methods & procedures: A survey was sent via email to 8,723 ATs (10.8% response rate[945/8723]) to capture demographics, management practices, and opinions (agreement on a seven-point Likert scale). We used Kruskal-Wallis tests to compare the percentage of patients instructed to refrain from driving across the highest earned a degree, setting, and years certified (alpha = 0.05).Main outcomes & results: When asked whether they recommended patients with concussion refrain from driving, 58.5%(n = 553/945) of ATs responded "sometimes", 37.9%(n = 358/945) responded "always", and 3.6%(n = 34/945) responded "never". ATs responding "sometimes" or "always" estimated that they instruct 57.6 ± 37.6% of patients with concussion to refrain from driving. ATs most commonly: recommended that patients refrain from driving until symptom resolution(44.7%,n = 399/892); utilized their clinical exam (patient interview/history) to determine when a patient could resume driving(64.9%,n = 579/892); and provided instructions verbally(94.2%,n = 840/892). High school(60.5 ± 37.6%) and clinical ATs(66.5 ± 31.2%) trended toward higher percentages of patients they instruct to refrain from driving relative to college(52.3 ± 38.2%; χ²(2) = 5.92,p = .052).Conclusions: ATs recommend driving restrictions to some, but not all, patients with concussion. Overall, ATs recognize post-concussion driving dangers, but do not strongly endorse refraining from driving after a concussion. High school and clinical ATs may manage more adolescent novice drivers and, therefore, act more conservatively.

Acute neurocognitive deficits in active duty service members following subconcussive blast exposure

Military service members are frequently subjected to subconcussive blast events during training and deployment. Emerging evidence suggests blast exposures of these magnitudes may have long-term consequences for dimensions of cognitive function. Less is known about cognitive sequelae acutely following deployment-related subconcussive blast events. The current study addressed this knowledge gap by assessing the extent to which subconcussive blast exposure affected performance on the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics 4 TBI-MIL (ANAM). Baseline-referenced and normative comparisons of archival ANAM data were analyzed for a cohort of personnel who were exposed to blast (blast group; n = 27) and personnel who were not exposed to blast (no-blast group; n = 36) that were otherwise asymptomatic for a concussion. The blast group exhibited statistically significant lower scores compared to the no-blast group (between-subjects), baseline assessments (within-subjects), and an age-matched normative population. Normative comparisons revealed that the scores for the reaction time subtests (i.e., procedural and both simple reaction time tasks) were outside the range of normal functioning (1 SD) and reliable change indices revealed clinically meaningful change only for simple reaction time. The results highlight covert effects of subconcussive blast exposure that may warrant further monitoring in the immediate aftermath of a blast event.

When Is It Safe to Drive after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury/Sports-related Concussion?

Driving an automobile has inherent danger, and driving after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI)/sports-related concussion (SRC) can make this task even more hazardous. There is evidence to suggest that restriction from driving for the first 24 to 48 h after mTBI/SRC is probably reasonable. However, after the first 48 h have passed, there is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation regarding return to driving. Clinicians need to weigh the evidence and make decisions on how to advise their patients on a case by case basis. Further research is required to provide a standardized recommendation.

Post-Concussion Driving Behaviors and Opinions: A Survey of Collegiate Student-Athletes

Post-concussion driving restrictions are eminent, but we lack understanding of current behaviors and opinions about driving following concussion among populations at risk of concussion. We aimed to describe post-concussion driving behaviors and opinions among collegiate student-athletes. Student-athletes completed a survey (response rate = 45.3%, 223/492) regarding their post-concussion driving behaviors and opinions. Response frequencies and percentages are presented. Student-athletes self-reported a total of 169 lifetime concussions (0.76 ± 1.02 each). Of the 169 concussions, 52.1% (88/169) were diagnosed and 52.7% (89/169) occurred while the student-athlete possessed a valid driver's license. Student-athletes refrained from driving following 43.8% (39/89) of the concussive events. Student-athletes who refrained most commonly did so for only 24-48 h (20.5%, 8/39) and because a health care provider advised them to (33.3%, 13/39). Student-athletes most commonly reported that they would feel "very unsafe" driving a car immediately following injury (38.4%, 84/219). When asked whether driving restrictions would influence their decision to report the injury to a health care provider, 7.9% reported that it "definitely would" (17/214), 26.6% "probably would" (57/214), 17.8%"neutral" (38/214), 24.8% "probably would not" (53/214), and 22.9% "definitely would not" (49/214). Despite generally believing that driving immediately following a concussion is unsafe, a majority of student-athletes did not refrain from driving at any point following their previous concussions. Post-concussion driving restrictions may have some influence on student-athletes' decisions to report the injury to a health care provider. Health care providers play a critical role in post-concussion driving restriction, but lack standardized recommendations to guide their care.