Reduction of Radiography with Point-of-Care Elbow Ultrasonography for Elbow Trauma in Children

Fracture sonography-review of literature and current recommendations

Over a span of more than two years, a collaborative expert group consisting of 9 professional societies has meticulously crafted the S2e guideline on fracture sonography. This publication encapsulates the essential insights pertaining to specific indications. A thorough and systematic literature search, covering the period from 2000 to March 2021, was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, complemented by an evaluation of bibliographies. Inclusion criteria encompassed randomized controlled clinical trials, observational clinical trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews, while guidelines, conferences, reviews, case reports, and expert opinions were excluded. The SIGN grading system (1999-2012) was applied to assess evidence, and resultant SIGN tables were presented to the expert group. Specific recommendations for the application of fracture sonography were then derived through unanimous consensus after detailed discussions. Out of the initial pool of 520 literature sources, a meticulous screening and content assessment process yielded 182 sources (146 clinical studies and 36 meta-analyses and systematic reviews) for evaluation. The comprehensive analysis identified twenty-one indications that substantiate the judicious use of fracture sonography. Ultrasound emerges as a pragmatic and user-friendly diagnostic method, showcasing feasibility across a diverse range of indications.

The diagnostic value of sonographic findings in pediatric elbow fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Sonography is a beneficial imaging modality for detecting elbow fractures in children, considering the lack of radiation exposure and time efficiency. This systematic review aims to determine the diagnostic value and clinical applicability of sonography and each sonographic finding in detecting pediatric elbow fractures.

METHODS

Pubmed, Scopus, and WOS databases were searched for related original articles until February 25, 2023, and data related to diagnostic performance were extracted. We used the Bivariate model and hierarchic summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) approach to calculate pooled diagnostic values. Cochrane Q test and I-squared were performed to evaluate heterogeneity. We assessed heterogeneity with meta-regression.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included, which involved a total number of 880 patients. According to meta-analysis, sonography demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 97% (91-99%) and specificity of 90% (80-95%), positive likelihood ratio(LR+) of 9.82 (4.59-20.97), and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.03 (0.01-0.10). For the sonographic posterior fat pad sign as a sole diagnostic sign, we calculated a Pooled Sensitivity of 80% (70-88%), Specificity of 97% (87-99%), LR+ of 28.8 (6-139.3), and LR- of 0.2 (0.13-0.31). Also, lipohemarthrosis demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 80% (70-88%), specificity of 97% (87-99%), LR+ of 28.8 (6-139.3), and LR- of 0.2 (0.13-0.31). The sensitivity of detecting fractures with cortical line disruption was significantly higher in studies that utilized a comprehensive technique compared to a conventional technique.

CONCLUSIONS

Sonography is a valuable diagnostic tool for the assessment of pediatric elbow injuries, and it can be capable of confirmation or exclusion of the diagnosis.

Effectiveness of ultrasonography performed at the emergency department for pediatric elbow trauma cases

BACKGROUND

Two-way direct radiography is the first-choice imaging method for pediatric patients presenting to the emergency department with elbow trauma. Although, unlike radiography, ultrasonography (US) is not used routinely, studies show that US can be used in the diagnosis of fractures in pediatric patients.

METHODS

In this single-center prospective observational study, patients under the age of 18 who presented to the emergency department after sustaining elbow trauma constituted the population of the study. Findings of the posterior fat pad sign using bedside US and the result obtained by seven-point assessment of the bone cortex were compared with the final diagnosis.

RESULTS

Of the 128 patients enrolled in the study, 6 patients were excluded due to various reasons. Seventy (57.4%) patients were male, and median age was 7.7 years. On examining the final diagnosis of the patients at the emergency department, fracture diagnosis was observed in 39 patients (32%). It was determined that fracture diagnosis for 94.9% of the patients included in the study could be achieved using US (in the presence of at least the fat pad sign and/or direct findings of fracture based on the seven-point assessment).

CONCLUSION

US should be considered as a diagnostic tool in cases of pediatric elbow traumas owing to its high sensitivity and negative predictive value. US, which is reproducible, ionizing radiation-free, and can be performed at the bedside, can considerably reduce unnecessary radiography in low-risk patients when evaluated along with physical examination findings among patients in the pediatric age group presenting with elbow trauma. We believe that the result of our study will contribute to patient care practices.

2D vs. 3D Ultrasound Diagnosis of Pediatric Supracondylar Fractures

Supracondylar fractures are common injuries in children. Diagnosis typically relies on radiography, which can involve long wait times in the ED, emits ionizing radiation, and can miss non-displaced fractures. Ultrasound (US) has the potential to be a safer, more convenient diagnostic tool, especially with new highly portable handheld 2D point of care US (POCUS). This study aimed to determine the reliability of 2D POCUS for the detection of supracondylar fractures and elbow joint effusions, to contrast the accuracy of 2D POCUS vs. 3DUS vs. radiographs, and to determine whether blinded image interpretation could produce similar results to non-blinded real-time imaging. Fifty-seven children were scanned with 2D POCUS and 3DUS on the affected elbow. US scans were then read by three blinded readers, and the results were compared to gold-standard radiographs. Compared to a gold standard of 30-day radiographic diagnosis, readers of 2D POCUS detected supracondylar fracture and effusion with sensitivities of 0.91 and 0.97, respectively, which were both higher than with 3DUS. Inter-rater reliability of fracture detection was moderate for 2D POCUS (k = 0.40) and 3DUS (k = 0.53). Consensus sensitivities, although high, were lower than reports from some non-blinded studies, indicating that clinical presentation serves as an important factor in detection rates. Our results from consensus US diagnosis support the validity of using 2D POCUS in children for supracondylar fracture and elbow effusion diagnosis.

Sonographic Fracture Diagnosis in Children and Adolescents

BACKGROUND

Clinical examination after trauma, especially in young children, often proves difficult. As a result, the majority of images show unremarkable findings in the imaging workup of trauma by radiography. Sonography represents an imaging technique without the use of X-rays. As the quality of ultrasound equipment has increased over the past 20 years, numerous studies have demonstrated that fractures in children and adolescents can be detected with very high sensitivity and specificity by sonography.

METHOD

This paper reviews the results obtained so far in the literature. Based on these findings, the importance of sonographic fracture diagnosis in childhood and adolescence for the most important locations is demonstrated.

RESULTS

When examining with a high-frequency linear transducer, sensitivities and specificities of more than 90 % can be achieved for the detection of fractures. Dislocations are also reliably detected. In contrast to X-ray examination, sonography allows the diagnosis of cartilage and soft-tissue injuries. Sonography reveals callus formation earlier than radiographs. The examination causes less pain than X-ray examination. If sonographic clarification is limited purely to fracture detection or exclusion, less time is required compared to X-ray diagnosis. The procedure can be learned quickly. If the documentation follows a defined standard examination procedure, the results can also be reproduced by non-examiners.

CONCLUSION

So far, sonography has only been an additive procedure in fracture diagnosis. However, there are now initial recommendations for sonographic fracture diagnosis alone, such as in skull, clavicle and non-displaced distal forearm fractures.

KEY POINTS

· Sonography can be used to detect or rule out fractures very sensitively.. · Sonographic examination causes less pain than X-ray examination.. · Sonography is usually an additive procedure in fracture diagnosis.. · In the meantime, sonography alone may be sufficient for diagnosing individual fractures..

ZITIERWEISE

· Moritz JD. Sonografische Frakturdiagnostik im Kindes- und Jugendalter. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2023; 195: 790 - 796.

Children With Elbow Injuries and Sonographic Elevated Posterior Fat Pad but No Identifiable Posterior Fat Pad on Lateral Radiographs: A Case Series

Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) is used to evaluate the injured pediatric elbow. Standard of care, however, remains radiography. POCUS performed in the setting of normal radiographs have been obtained may demonstrate radiologic occult lipohemarthrosis indicative of occult fracture. We reviewed our pediatric emergency department (PED) POCUS archive for lipohemarthrosis, and then isolated those cases with normal elbow radiography. Radiography was deemed to be normal per the interpretation of the treating PED physician, and was reviewed for this series by an experienced ABR board certified pediatric radiologist. Fracture on POCUS was defined as fracture line or lipohemarthrosis in a posterior sagittal or transverse view of the distal humerus. Fracture was confirmed by signs of cortical healing on follow-up radiography, or clinical course consistent with fracture as documented by an orthopedist. We identified four children with elbow fractures who had no fracture line or elevated posterior fat pad on radiography but demonstrated lipohemarthrosis on POCUS. POCUS may elicit evidence of fracture even after normal radiography, and POCUS findings suggesting occult fracture may allow for more effective guidance on discharge.

Ultrasonography of the pediatric elbow

Ultrasound of the elbow can be incorporated into routine pediatric practice in the radiology department, emergency department, orthopedic clinic, and interventional suite. Ultrasound is complementary to radiography and magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of elbow pain in athletes with overhead activities or valgus stress, focusing on the ulnar collateral ligament medially and capitellum laterally. As a primary imaging modality, ultrasound can be used for a variety of indications including inflammatory arthritis, fracture diagnosis, and ulnar neuritis/subluxation. Ultrasound is also well-suited to guide diagnostic and therapeutic elbow joint interventions with precise localization of anatomic landmarks and needle placement. Here, we describe technical aspects of elbow ultrasound and illustrate its application in pediatric patients from infants to teen athletes.

Ultrasound assistance in treatment with elastic stable intramedullary nail fixation in radial and ulnar fractures in children

PURPOSE

Radial and ulnar fractures are one of the most common fractures in children. When closed reduction of fractures fails, elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN) fixation can mostly be used under the guidance of fluoroscopy. In this study, we evaluated the effect of ultrasound (US) as assistance for radial and ulnar fracture reduction and the insertion of ESINs.

METHODS

There were 56 patients with midshaft radial and ulnar fractures included in our hospital from March 2019 to August 2021. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria and according to the treatment method, they were divided into the US group (patients treated with US assistance) and the conventional group (C-group, patients treated with fluoroscopy guidance). All patients' clinical data were collected. Operation time, fluoroscopy times, radiation dose, and post-operative complications were analyzed. The elbow function was evaluated using the Mayo Elbow Performance Index.

RESULTS

There were 26 patients in the US group and 30 in the C-group. The average operation time was 44.5±19.4 min in the US group and 65.1±16.2 min in the C-group. There were significant differences regarding the surgery time, fluoroscopy time, and radiation dose between the groups (all p = 0.001). The average follow-up time was 13.5±3.1 months. No significant difference was found regarding radial nerve injury, extensor pollicis longus rupture, non-union or delayed union, ulnar nerve injury, or acute compartment syndrome. There was no difference in elbow function at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

US guidance can be adopted for the treatment of displaced radial and ulnar fracture reduction and the insertion of ESINs. It can significantly decrease fluoroscopy times, radiation doses, and duration of surgery.

Could Ultrasound Be Used as a Triage Tool in Diagnosing Fractures in Children? A Literature Review

Fracture is one of the most frequent causes of emergency department visits in children, conventional radiography being the standard imaging tool used for following procedures and treatment. This imagistic method is irradiating and harmful, especially for children due to their high cell division rate. For this reason, we searched the literature to see if musculoskeletal ultrasound is a good alternative for diagnostic and follow-up regarding fractures in the pediatric population. After searching the databases using MeSH terms and manual filters, 24 articles that compare X-ray and ultrasound regarding their specificity and sensitivity in diagnosing fractures were included in this study. In the majority of the studied articles, the specificity and sensitivity of ultrasound are around 90–100%, and with high PPVs (positive predictive values) and NPVs (negative predictive values). Although it cannot replace conventional radiography, it is a great complementary tool in fracture diagnosis, having a sensitivity of nearly 100% when combined with clinical suspicion of fracture, compared with X-ray.

[Fracture sonography of the extremities]

In this article the basic principles of fracture sonography and meaningful areas of application in children and adults are explained. The sonographic fracture signs are presented and the typical areas of application, i.e. clavicular fracture, acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation, proximal humerus fracture, elbow fracture, wrist fracture, metacarpal 5 fracture, palmar plate, femoral bulge fracture, proximal tibia fracture, midfoot V fracture, toddler's fracture and march fracture, are outlined and known diagnostic algorithms are listed. When used correctly, fracture sonography is a safe, gentle and rapid diagnostic method.

Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for diagnosis of elbow fractures in children

BACKGROUND

Elbow injuries and fractures are a common pathology in the pediatric emergency unit. X-ray and CT scan of the elbow are the standard diagnostic procedures, which increase exposure to radiation in children. Previous studies have shown that fractures can also be visualized by ultrasound (US); thus, this study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of elbow US compared with radiography for the diagnosis of elbow fracture in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective observational study of patients aged 2-14 years that presented to emergency departments with a suspected elbow fracture requiring radiographic evaluation. Elbow US for diagnosing elevated posterior fat pad or lipohemarthrosis was performed. All patients underwent elbow radiography and received clinical follow-up. Initial or follow-up X-ray or CT scan was used as the reference standard for fracture diagnosis.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients with a mean age of 6.51 ± 3.68 years were enrolled in the study. Twenty-eight (37.3%) patients had positive results for fracture. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of US in the diagnosis of elbow fractures were 92.9% (95% CI 76.5-99.1%), 89.4% (95% CI 76.9-96.5%) and 90.7% (95% CI 81.7-96.2%). In patients with fracture, US demonstrated a lipohaemarthrosis in 20 patients (71.4%), elevated posterior fat pad in 19 patients (67.9%), cortical disruption in 10 patients (35.7%), and effusion in three patients (10.7%).

CONCLUSION

Our results showed high diagnostic accuracy for the ultrasonography diagnosis of an elbow fracture, which allows us to confirm ultrasonography imaging of the elbow as a safe alternative in the primary evaluation of pediatric elbow injuries.

Surveillance ultrasonography for conservative treatment of femoral shaft fractures in young children

BACKGROUND

The treatment for femoral shaft fracture (FSF) depends on the age of the patient. While the Pavlik harness is the first choice for patients under 6 months of age, spica casting is preferred for patients over 6 months and under preschool age. Minimally-invasive surgery using elastic stable intramedullary nails is also used in some cases. Skin traction is another treatment choice for some patients who are not candidates for the above methods. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of surveillance ultrasonography (US) for the conservative treatment of FSFs in young children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 92 children who were diagnosed with FSF in our hospital from April 2017 to May 2019. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, they were divided into US surveillance (A) and control (B) groups. All patients received conservative treatment by skin traction. For group A, US was used to assess the femur fractures and adjust its reduction on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14 until the fracture stabilized. For group B, the fractures were checked by radiographs on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14 until the callus appeared. The FSF angle was measured using anteroposterior and lateral radiographs.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up for 18 months. The radiographic evaluation of both groups at the final follow-up showed a significant difference in the FSF angle. The radiograph times and accumulated radiation also showed significant differences between the two groups. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

For FSF closed reduction, surveillance US is a better option compared to radiographs in children treated by skin traction. This approach can significantly decrease exposure to X-ray radiation and improve the reduction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The Child With a Painful Arm: A POCUS Screening Protocol to Identify Fracture in Children With Upper Extremity Injury

BACKGROUND

Young children present frequently to the emergency department with an immobile, painful arm. It is often difficult to discern a point of tenderness in a frightened, injured child. Common approaches included sending the child for x-ray studies of the extremity or empirically attempting reduction of radial head subluxation. We created a step-by-step point-of-care ultrasound screening protocol of the upper extremity to increase or decrease the probability of fracture before x-ray study or reduction.

CASE REPORT

We present the cases of 6 children younger than 4 years without a clear history of pulled elbow and without swelling or deformity on examination, for whom this protocol revealed fracture or lowered the probability of fracture, thereby increasing the safety of radial head reduction. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: In most cases, identification of a single fracture on ultrasound allows for focused x-ray study on the area of fracture. Children with a normal ultrasound screen can undergo reduction of radial head subluxation safely.

Treatment of displaced radial neck fractures under ultrasonographic guidance in children

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of reduction under ultrasonographic (US) guidance with Kirschner wires (K-wires) and fixation with elastic stable intramedullary nails (ESINs) in the treatment of radial neck fractures (RNFs).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 50 children treated for Judet types III and IV RNFs at our hospital from September 2015 to November 2018. Patients were divided into two groups: group A (without US) and group B (with US). Group A patients were treated using the Métaizeau technique; one K-wire was used for reduction under the guidance of X-ray fluoroscopy. Group B patients were treated using the same technique, but under the guidance of US. Post-operative radiographs, elbow function, and complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up over a period of 12 months. Five patients in group A had posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) injury, whereas no patient in group B had PIN injury (p = 0.016). The use of US guidance resulted in lower radiation exposure and shorter operation time. According to the Mayo Elbow Performance Index, there was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.814), including post-operative complications (radial head necrosis, fracture displacement, or stiffness).

CONCLUSION

US guidance during surgery is feasible to treat Judet type III and IV RNFs. US guidance can significantly reduce X-ray radiation exposure and the risk of PIN injury.

Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for upper extremity fractures in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Ultrasound has an excellent diagnostic accuracy for fractures that is reportedly comparable to plain radiographs. We aim to summarize the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for upper extremity fractures in children.

METHODS

Databases were searched from inception through November 2019 using pre-defined index terms, including "ultrasound," "fractures of upper extremities" and "children". The study is reported using Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA). Meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for fractures was conducted using the random-effects bivariate model. Subgroup analysis of fracture site (elbow vs non-elbow fractures) was also performed. Meta-regression was performed to determine if the site of fracture affected the diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies were identified in the meta-analysis. Ultrasound for fractures of the upper extremities has a sensitivity: 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97), specificity: 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-0.98), positive likelihood ratio: 21.1 (95% CI: 10.8-41.5) and negative likelihood ratio: 0.05 (95% CI: 0.03-0.07), with an area under ROC (AUROC) curve of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97-0.99). Subgroup analysis for elbow fracture showed ultrasound has a sensitivity: 0.95 (95% CI: 0.86-0.98), specificity: 0.87 (95% CI: 0.76-0.94), positive likelihood ratio: 7.3 (95% CI: 3.7-14.4) and negative likelihood ratio: 0.06 (95% CI: 0.02-0.16), with an AUROC of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.97). Meta-regression suggested the fracture sites would affect diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound (elbow vs non-elbow, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests ultrasound has excellent diagnostic accuracy for non-elbow upper extremity fractures in children, serving as an alternative diagnostic modality to plain radiographs.

Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography for Detection of Pediatric Elbow Fracture: A Meta-analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasonography for detection of elbow fracture in pediatric patients with trauma.

METHODS

PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for diagnostic accuracy studies that used ultrasonography for detection of elbow fracture in pediatric patients. Bivariate modeling and hierarchic summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) modeling were conducted to evaluate diagnostic performance. The pooled proportions of the false-negative rate were assessed with a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. We performed meta-regression analyses for heterogeneity exploration.

RESULTS

Ten articles involving a total of 519 patients were included. The summary sensitivity, summary specificity, and area under the hierarchic summary ROC curve were 96% (95% confidence interval 88% to 99%), 89% (95% confidence interval 82% to 94%), and 0.97 (95% confidence interval 0.95 to 0.98), respectively. The pooled proportion of the false-negative rate of ultrasonography was 3.7%. Among the various potential covariates, ultrasonographic performer (pediatric emergency physician versus others) and presence of extra musculoskeletal ultrasonographic training (trained versus not reported) were associated with heterogeneity of the specificity.

CONCLUSION

Elbow ultrasonography demonstrated high performance in the diagnosis of pediatric elbow fracture, particularly in studies of physicians with extra training in musculoskeletal ultrasonography. Ultrasonography may be performed by trained physicians as a first-line diagnostic tool to diagnose pediatric elbow fracture.