A Comprehensive Clinical Genetics Approach to Critical Congenital Heart Disease in Infancy

Is there an increased risk of genetic abnormalities in fetuses with congenital heart disease in the setting of growth restriction?

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the presence of fetal growth restriction (FGR) is associated with an increased risk of genetic abnormalities in the setting of congenital heart disease (CHD).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study involving pregnancies that met the following criteria: (i) prenatal diagnosis of CHD, (ii) singleton live-birth, and (iii) genetic testing was performed either pre- or postnatally. Genetic results were reviewed by a clinical geneticist for updated variant classification. Fetal growth was stratified as appropriate for gestational age (AGA) or FGR.

RESULTS

Of the total of 445 fetuses that met the study criteria, 325 (73.0%) were AGA and 120 (27.0%) were FGR. Genetic abnormalities were detected in 131 (29.4%) pregnancies. There was a higher rate of genetic abnormalities (36.7% vs. 26.8%, p = 0.04), which was driven by aneuploidies (20.8% vs. 8.9%, p = 0.0006) in the FGR population. Early onset growth restriction was associated with a higher rate of genetic abnormalities (44.5% vs. 25.9%, p = 0.03). The rate of genetic abnormalities was significantly higher in the shunt category as compared to remainder of the cardiac anomalies (62.5% in shunt lesions vs. 24.7%, p < 0.00001). The rates of FGR (40.9% vs. 21.4%, p < 0.0001) and genetic abnormalities (52% vs. 20.4%, p < 0.0001) were significantly higher in the presence of extra-cardiac anomalies (ECA).

CONCLUSION

The presence of FGR in fetal CHD population was associated with underlying genetic abnormalities, specifically aneuploidies. Patients should be appropriately counseled regarding the higher likelihood of a genetic condition in the presence of FGR, early onset FGR, shunt lesions and ECA.

Current approach to genetic testing and genetic evaluation referrals for adults with congenital heart disease

Background

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common congenital anomaly. Up to 33% have an identifiable genetic etiology. Improved medical and surgical management of CHD has translated into longer life expectancy and a rapidly growing population of adults living with CHD. The adult CHD (ACHD) population did not have access during childhood to the genetic technologies available today and therefore have not had a robust genetic evaluation that is currently recommended for infants with CHD. Given this potential benefit; the aims of this study were to determine how ACHD cardiologists offer genetics services to patients and identify the indications that influence decision-making for genetics care.

Methods

We performed a descriptive cross-sectional study of ACHD cardiologists. A study-developed questionnaire was distributed via emailed REDCap link. The recruitment email was sent to 104 potential respondents. The survey was open from 06/2022 to 01/2023.

Results

Thirty-five cardiologists participated in the study (response rate of 34%). Most cardiologists identified as white (77%) and male (66%). Cardiologists were more likely to refer patients to genetics (91%) than to order testing themselves (57%). Of the testing ordered, chromosomal testing (55%) was ordered more than gene sequencing (14%). Most cardiologists would refer a patient with a conotruncal lesion (interrupted aortic arch) over other indications for a genetics evaluation. There were more reported barriers to ordering genetic testing (66%) compared to referring to genetics for a genetics evaluation (23%). Cardiologists were more confident recognizing features suggestive of a genetic syndrome than ordering the correct test (p = 0.001). Regarding associations between clinical factors and current practices, more years in practice trended towards less referrals and testing. Evaluating a greater number of patients (p = 0.11) and greater confidence recognizing syndromic features (p = 0.12) and ordering the correct test (p = 0.09) were all associated with ordering more testing.

Conclusion

Testing for microdeletion syndromes is being offered and completed in the ACHD population, however testing for single-gene disorders associated with CHD is being under-utilized. Developing guidelines for genetic testing in adults with CHD could increase access to genetic services, impact medical management, reduce uncertainty regarding prognosis, and inform recurrence risk estimates.

Clinical Genetic and Genomic Testing in Congenital Heart Disease and Cardiomyopathy

Congenital heart disease (CHD) and cardiomyopathies are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. These conditions are often caused by genetic factors, and recent research has shown that genetic and genomic testing can provide valuable information for patient care. By identifying genetic causes, healthcare providers can screen for other related health conditions, offer early interventions, estimate prognosis, select appropriate treatments, and assess the risk for family members. Genetic and genomic testing is now the standard of care in patients with CHD and cardiomyopathy. However, rapid advances in technology and greater availability of testing options have led to changes in recommendations for the most appropriate testing method. Several recent studies have investigated the utility of genetic testing in this changing landscape. This review summarizes the literature surrounding the clinical utility of genetic evaluation in patients with CHD and cardiomyopathy.

Clinical Decision Analysis of Genetic Evaluation and Testing in 1013 Intensive Care Unit Infants with Congenital Heart Defects Supports Universal Genetic Testing

Extracardiac anomalies (ECAs) are strong predictors of genetic disorders in infants with congenital heart disease (CHD), but there are no prior studies assessing performance of ECA status as a screen for genetic diagnoses in CHD patients. This retrospective cohort study assessed this in our comprehensive inpatient CHD genetics service focusing on neonates and infants admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The performance and diagnostic utility of using ECA status to screen for genetic disorders was assessed using decision curve analysis, a statistical tool to assess clinical utility, determining the threshold of phenotypic screening by ECA versus a Test-All approach. Over 24% of infants had genetic diagnoses identified (n = 244/1013), and ECA-positive status indicated a 4-fold increased risk of having a genetic disorder. However, ECA status had low-moderate screening performance based on predictive summary index, a compositive measure of positive and negative predictive values. For those with genetic diagnoses, nearly one-third (32%, 78/244) were ECA-negative but had cytogenetic and/or monogenic disorders identified by genetic testing. Thus, if the presence of multiple congenital anomalies is the phenotypic driver to initiate genetic testing, 13.4% (78/580) of infants with isolated CHD with identifiable genetic causes will be missed. Given the prevalence of genetic disorders and limited screening performance of ECA status, this analysis supports genetic testing in all CHD infants in intensive care settings rather than screening based on ECA.

Phenotypes and genotypes in a cohort of children with single-ventricle CHD

OBJECTIVE

CHD is known to be associated with increased risk for neurodevelopmental disorders. The combination of CHD with neurodevelopmental disorders and/or extra-cardiac anomalies increases the chance for an underlying genetic diagnosis. Over the last 15 years, there has been a dramatic increase in the use of broad-scale genetic testing. We sought to determine if neurodevelopmental disorders in children with single-ventricle CHD born prior to the genetic testing revolution are associated with genetic diagnosis.

METHODS

We identified 74 5-12-year-old patients with single-ventricle CHD post-Fontan procedure. We retrospectively evaluated genetic testing performed and neurodevelopmental status of these patients.

RESULTS

In this cohort, there was an overall higher rate of neurodevelopmental disorders (80%) compared to the literature (50%). More of the younger (5-7-year-old) patients were seen by genetic counsellors compared to the older (8-12-year-old) cohort (46% versus 19% p value = 0.01). In the younger cohort, the average age of initial consultation was 7.7 days compared to 251 days in the older cohort. The overall rate of achieving a molecular diagnosis was 12% and 8% in the younger and older cohorts, respectively; however, the vast majority of did not have broad genetic testing.

CONCLUSION

The minority of patients in our cohort achieved a genetic diagnosis. Given a large increase in the number of genes associated with monogenic CHD and neurodevelopmental disorders in the last decade, comprehensive testing and consultation with clinical genetics should be considered in this age range, since current testing standards did not exist during their infancy.

Diagnostic yield after next-generation sequencing in pediatric cardiovascular disease

Genetic testing with exome sequencing and genome sequencing is increasingly offered to infants and children with cardiovascular diseases. However, the rates of positive diagnoses after genetic testing within the different categories of cardiac disease and phenotypic subtypes of congenital heart disease (CHD) have been little studied. We report the diagnostic yield after next-generation sequencing in 500 patients with CHD from diverse population subgroups that were enrolled at three different sites in the Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research consortium. Patients were ascertained due to a primary cardiovascular issue comprising arrhythmia, cardiomyopathy, and/or CHD, and corresponding human phenotype ontology terms were selected to describe the cardiac and extracardiac findings. We examined the diagnostic yield for patients with arrhythmia, cardiomyopathy, and/or CHD and phenotypic subtypes of CHD comprising conotruncal defects, heterotaxy, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, septal defects, and "other" heart defects. We found a significant increase in the frequency of positive findings for patients who underwent genome sequencing compared to exome sequencing and for syndromic cardiac defects compared to isolated cardiac defects. We also found significantly higher diagnostic rates for patients who presented with isolated cardiomyopathy compared to isolated CHD. For patients with syndromic presentations who underwent genome sequencing, there were significant differences in the numbers of positive diagnoses for phenotypic subcategories of CHD, ranging from 31.7% for septal defects to 60% for "other". Despite variation in the diagnostic yield at each site, our results support genetic testing in pediatric patients with syndromic and isolated cardiovascular issues and in all subtypes of CHD.

Rapid Genome Sequencing Shows Diagnostic Utility In Infants With Congenital Heart Defects

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common birth defect and a leading cause of infant mortality. CHD often has a genetic etiology and recent studies demonstrate utility in genetic testing. In clinical practice, decisions around genetic testing choices continue to evolve, and the incorporation of rapid genome sequencing (rGS) in CHD has not been well studied. Though smaller studies demonstrate the value of rGS, they also highlight the burden of results interpretation. We analyze genetic testing in CHD at two time-points, in 2018 and 2022-2023, across a change in clinical testing guidelines from chromosome microarray (CMA) to rGS. Analysis of 421 hospitalized infants with CHD demonstrated consistent genetic testing across time. Overall, after incorporation of rGS in 2022-2023, the diagnostic yield was 6.8% higher compared to 2018, and this pattern was consistent across all patient subtypes analyzed. In 2018, CMA was the most common test performed, with diagnostic results for CHD in 14.3%, while in 2022-2023, rGS was the most frequent test performed, with results diagnostic for CHD in 16.9%. Additionally, rGS identified 44% more unique genetic diagnoses than CMA. This is the largest study to highlight the value of rGS in CHD and has important implications for management.

Genomic testing and molecular diagnosis among infants with congenital heart disease in the neonatal intensive care unit

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate patterns of genetic testing among infants with CHD at a tertiary care center.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of infants in the NICU with suspicion of a genetic disorder. 1075 of 7112 infants admitted to BCH had genetic evaluation including 329 with CHD and 746 without CHD. 284 of 525 infants with CHD admitted to CMHH had genetic evaluation. Patterns of testing and diagnoses were compared.

RESULTS

The rate of diagnosis after testing was similar for infants with or without CHD (38% [121/318] vs. 36% [246/676], p = 0.14). In a multiple logistic regression, atrioventricular septal defects were most high associated with genetic diagnosis (odds ratio 29.99, 95% confidence interval 2.69-334.12, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Infants with suspicion of a genetic disorder with CHD had similar rates of molecular diagnosis as those without CHD. These results support a role for genetic testing among NICU infants with CHD.

Genetic counselling considerations with genetic/genomic testing in Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care Units: A scoping review

Genetic and genomic technologies can effectively diagnose numerous genetic disorders. Patients benefit when genetic counselling accompanies genetic testing and international guidelines recommend pre- and post-test genetic counselling with genome-wide sequencing. However, there is a gap in knowledge regarding the unique genetic counselling considerations with different types of genetic testing in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) and the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). This scoping review was conducted to identify the gaps in care with respect to genetic counselling for infants/pediatric patients undergoing genetic and genomic testing in NICUs and PICUs and understand areas in need of improvement in order to optimize clinical care for patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers. Five databases (MEDLINE [Ovid], Embase [Ovid], PsycINFO [Ebsco], CENTRAL [Ovid], and CINHAL [Ebsco]) and grey literature were searched. A total of 170 studies were included and used for data extraction and analysis. This scoping review includes descriptive analysis, followed by a narrative account of the extracted data. Results were divided into three groups: pre-test, post-test, and comprehensive (both pre- and post-test) genetic counselling considerations based on indication for testing. More studies were conducted in the NICU than the PICU. Comprehensive genetic counselling was discussed in only 31% of all the included studies demonstrating the need for both pre-test and post-test genetic counselling for different clinical indications in addition to the need to account for different cultural aspects based on ethnicity and geographic factors.

Genetic Testing Guidelines Impact Care in Newborns with Congenital Heart Defects

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate genetic evaluation practices in newborns with the most common birth defect, congenital heart defects (CHD), we determined the prevalence and the yield of genetic evaluation across time and across patient subtypes, before and after implementation of institutional genetic testing guidelines.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study of 664 hospitalized newborns with CHD using multivariate analyses of genetic evaluation practices across time and patient subtypes.

RESULTS

Genetic testing guidelines for hospitalized newborns with CHD were implemented in 2014, and subsequently genetic testing increased (40% in 2013 and 75% in 2018, OR 5.02, 95% CI 2.84-8.88, P < .001) as did medical geneticists' involvement (24% in 2013 and 64% in 2018, P < .001). In 2018, there was an increased use of chromosomal microarray (P < .001), gene panels (P = .016), and exome sequencing (P = .001). The testing yield was high (42%) and consistent across years and patient subtypes analyzed. Increased testing prevalence (P < .001) concomitant with consistent testing yield (P = .139) added an estimated 10 additional genetic diagnoses per year, reflecting a 29% increase.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CHD, yield of genetic testing was high. After implementing guidelines, genetic testing increased significantly and shifted to newer sequence-based methods. Increased use of genetic testing identified more patients with clinically important results with potential to impact patient care.

A Genetic Etiology Identified for a Form of Familial Polyvalvular Dysplasia

This case presents a family with multiple individuals diagnosed with congenital heart disease (CHD) secondary to a novel TAK1-binding protein 2 pathogenic variant. This case advocates the use of cardiovascular genetic testing in individuals with CHD as part of a comprehensive approach to managing infants with CHD. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Copy-number variation in congenital heart disease

Genomic copy-number variants (CNVs) contribute to as many congenital heart disease (CHD) cases (10-15%) as chromosomal aberrations or single-gene mutations and influence clinical outcomes. CNVs in a few genomic hotspots (1q21.1, 2q13, 8p23.1, 11q24, 15q11.2, 16p11.2, and 22q11.2) are recurrently enriched in CHD cohorts and affect dosage-sensitive transcriptional regulators that are required for cardiac development. Reduced penetrance and pleiotropic effects on brain and heart development are common features of these CNVs. Therefore, additional genetic 'hits,' such as a second CNV or gene mutation, are probably required to cause CHD in most cases. Integrative analysis of CNVs, genome sequence, epigenetic alterations, and gene function will be required to delineate the complete genetic landscape of CHD.

Prospects for precision genetic medicine in congenital heart disease

Precision medicine, defined as tailoring medical care individually based upon relevant factors, is primarily implemented currently through the use of genetic variation. Over the past thirty years, the possibility of determining specific genetic variants underlying congenital heart disease has increased dramatically. This has created the potential for using precision genetic approaches to improve care and outcomes for patients and families with congenital heart disease. In this review, recent advances in understanding the roles of genetic variants in various outcomes, in developing novel therapeutic approaches, and in refining clinical trials for congenital heart disease are discussed.

Learning to Crawl: Determining the Role of Genetic Abnormalities on Postoperative Outcomes in Congenital Heart Disease

Background Our cardiac center established a systematic approach for inpatient cardiovascular genetics evaluations of infants with congenital heart disease, including routine chromosomal microarray (CMA) testing. This provides a new opportunity to investigate correlation between genetic abnormalities and postoperative course. Methods and Results Infants who underwent congenital heart disease surgery as neonates (aged ≤28 days) from 2015 to 2020 were identified. Cases with trisomy 21 or 18 were excluded. Diagnostic genetic results or CMA with variant of uncertain significance were considered abnormal. We compared postoperative outcomes following initial congenital heart disease surgery in patients found to have genetic abnormality to those who had negative CMA. Among 355 eligible patients, genetics consultations or CMA were completed in 88%. A genetic abnormality was identified in 73 patients (21%), whereas 221 had negative CMA results. Genetic abnormality was associated with prematurity, extracardiac anomaly, and lower weight at surgery. Operative mortality rate was 9.6% in patients with a genetic abnormality versus 4.1% in patients without an identified genetic abnormality (P=0.080). Mortality was similar when genetic evaluations were diagnostic (9.3%) or identified a variant of uncertain significance on CMA (10.0%). Among 14 patients with 22q11.2 deletion, the 2 mortality cases had additional CMA findings. In patients without extracardiac anomaly, genetic abnormality was independently associated with increased mortality (P=0.019). CMA abnormality was not associated with postoperative length of hospitalization, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or >7 days to initial extubation. Conclusions Routine genetic evaluations and CMA may help to stratify mortality risk in severe congenital heart disease with syndromic or nonsyndromic presentations.

Prevalence of Genetic Diagnoses in a Cohort With Valvar Pulmonary Stenosis

Background:

Valvar pulmonary stenosis (vPS) accounts for 8% to 12% of congenital heart disease cases. Multiple genetic syndromes are associated with vPS, most commonly Noonan syndrome, but the cause is unknown in most cases. We analyzed genomic data from a large cohort with vPS to determine the prevalence of genetic diagnosis.

Methods:

The Pediatric Cardiac Genomics Consortium database was queried to identify probands with vPS without complex congenital heart disease or aneuploidy and with existing whole exome or genome sequencing. A custom analysis workflow was used to identify likely pathogenic or pathogenic variants in disease-associated genes. Demographic and phenotypic characteristics were compared between groups with and without molecular diagnoses.

Results:

Data from 119 probands (105 trios) were included. A molecular diagnosis was identified in 22 (18%); 17 (14%) had Noonan syndrome or a related disorder. Extracardiac and neurodevelopmental comorbidities were seen in 67/119 (56%) of probands. Molecular diagnosis was more common in those with extracardiac and neurodevelopmental phenotypes than those without (18/67 versus 4/52, P =0.0086).

Conclusions:

Clinicians should have high suspicion for a genetic diagnosis in individuals with vPS, particularly if additional phenotypes are present. Our results suggest that clinicians should consider offering sequencing of at least the known congenital heart disease and RASopathy genes to all individuals with vPS, regardless of whether that individual has extracardiac or neurodevelopmental phenotypes present.

Isolated Coarctation of the Aorta: Current Concepts and Perspectives

Current management of isolated CoA, localized narrowing of the aortic arch in the absence of other congenital heart disease, is a success story with improved prenatal diagnosis, high survival and improved understanding of long-term complication. Isolated CoA has heterogenous presentations, complex etiologic mechanisms, and progressive pathophysiologic changes that influence outcome. End-to-end or extended end-to-end anastomosis are the favored surgical approaches for isolated CoA in infants and transcatheter intervention is favored for children and adults. Primary stent placement is the procedure of choice in larger children and adults. Most adults with treated isolated CoA thrive, have normal daily activities, and undergo successful childbirth. Fetal echocardiography is the cornerstone of prenatal counseling and genetic testing is recommended. Advanced 3D imaging identifies aortic complications and myocardial dysfunction and guides individualized therapies including re-intervention. Adult CHD program enrollment is recommended. Longer follow-up data are needed to determine the frequency and severity of aneurysm formation, myocardial dysfunction, and whether childhood lifestyle modifications reduce late-onset complications.

Genetic Testing for Heritable Cardiovascular Diseases in Pediatric Patients: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Genetic diseases that affect the cardiovascular system are relatively common and include cardiac channelopathies, cardiomyopathies, aortopathies, hypercholesterolemias, and structural diseases of the heart and great vessels. The rapidly expanding availability of clinical genetic testing leverages decades of research into the genetic origins of these diseases, helping inform diagnosis, clinical management, and prognosis. Although a number of guidelines and statements detail best practices for cardiovascular genetic testing, there is a paucity of pediatric-focused statements addressing the unique challenges in testing in this vulnerable population. In this scientific statement, we seek to coalesce the existing literature around the use of genetic testing for cardiovascular disease in infants, children, and adolescents.

Genetic Evaluation of Inpatient Neonatal and Infantile Congenital Heart Defects: New Findings and Review of the Literature

The use of clinical genetics evaluations and testing for infants with congenital heart defects (CHDs) is subject to practice variation. This single-institution cross-sectional study of all inpatient infants with severe CHDs evaluated 440 patients using a cardiovascular genetics service (2014–2019). In total, 376 (85.5%) had chromosome microarray (CMA), of which 55 (14.6%) were diagnostic in syndromic (N = 35) or isolated (N = 20) presentations. Genetic diagnoses were made in all CHD classes. Diagnostic yield was higher in syndromic appearing infants, but geneticists’ dysmorphology exams lacked complete sensitivity and 6.5% of isolated CHD cases had diagnostic CMA. Interestingly, diagnostic results (15.8%) in left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) defects occurred most often in patients with isolated CHD. Geneticists’ evaluations were particularly important for second-tier molecular testing (10.5% test-specific yield), bringing the overall genetic testing yield to 17%. We assess these results in the context of previous studies. Cumulative evidence provides a rationale for comprehensive, standardized genetic evaluation in infants with severe CHDs regardless of lesion or extracardiac anomalies because genetic diagnoses that impact care are easily missed. These findings support routine CMA testing in infants with severe CHDs and underscore the importance of copy-number analysis with newer testing strategies such as exome and genome sequencing.

Variants of significance: medical genetics and surgical outcomes in congenital heart disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the current understanding and limitations in knowledge of the effect genetics and genetic diagnoses have on perioperative and postoperative surgical outcomes in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD).

RECENT FINDINGS

Presence of a known genetic diagnosis seems to effect multiple significant outcome metrics in CHD surgery including length of stay, need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, mortality, bleeding, and heart failure. Data regarding the effects of genetics in CHD is complicated by lack of standard genetic assessment resulting in inaccurate risk stratification of patients when analyzing data. Only 30% of variation in CHD surgical outcomes are explained by currently measured variables, with 2.5% being attributed to diagnosed genetic disorders, it is thought a significant amount of the remaining outcome variation is because of unmeasured genetic factors.

SUMMARY

Genetic diagnoses clearly have a significant effect on surgical outcomes in patients with CHD. Our current understanding is limited by lack of consistent genetic evaluation and assessment as well as evolving knowledge and discovery regarding the genetics of CHD. Standardizing genetic assessment of patients with CHD will allow for the best risk stratification and ultimate understanding of these effects.