Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas: a multicenter study of 23 pediatric cases

Clinical Insights Into Pediatric Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms of the Pancreas

BACKGROUND

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) of the pancreas are rare tumors with low malignant potential that usually occur in young girls and women. This study investigated the treatment experiences and outcomes after surgery for pediatric SPNs in our institutions as pediatric case series of solid SPNs are few, and long-term follow-up is also limited.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of nine patients diagnosed with SPNs who underwent surgery in our three hospitals (The Jikei University Hospital, The Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, and Kawaguchi Municipal Medical Center) between 2001 and 2023.

RESULTS

All nine patients who underwent surgery were girls. Their ages ranged from 8 to 15 years (median: 10 years). The location of the tumor was at the pancreatic head, body, and tail in five, one, and three patients, respectively. Enucleation, pancreaticoduodenectomy, and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) were performed in four, two, and three patients, respectively. Regarding postoperative complications, a pancreatic fistula was detected in six patients, with three and three patients having grades A and B fistulas, respectively; two patients required percutaneous drainage, and one patient required endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided transgastric drainage. The follow-up period ranged from six to 261 months (median: 97 months). At the final follow-up, all nine patients were alive without recurrence.

CONCLUSION

SPNs of the pancreas are incidentally diagnosed by diagnostic workups following trauma in children more frequently compared to adults. Additionally, the tumor resection by minimally invasive approaches, such as enucleation, or laparoscopic procedures results in a good prognosis in some cases.

Pediatric Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas

Background

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas in children is a rare tumor with low malignant potential. Some tumors, however, behave aggressively. There is very little literature on managing these variants, especially in children. We share our experience of managing large and recurrent SPN and explore the clinicopathological findings correlating to the risk of recurrence.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of children treated for SPN between 2012 and 2022 at a tertiary care center in India. The clinicopathological features and management strategies in these children were evaluated.

Results

Sixteen children with SPN were treated during this period (88% of girls). The median age of presentation was 12 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 9-14). All children presented with abdominal pain. Computed tomography gave a definitive diagnosis in 81% of cases. The tumor predominantly involved the head of the pancreas (n = 9, 56%). Eight of nine children classified as high-grade (HG) malignant had a benign course. One child had a recurrence of the tumor 4 years after the initial resection and further recurrence on chemotherapy. She required radiation therapy in addition to reoperation following which she was disease free for 77 months. The overall median follow-up was 46 months (IQR: 18-72 months).

Conclusion

Complete resection of the tumor provides a cure in most patients with SPN. Recurrent tumors require a multi-modality approach. Long-term survival is good. There is a need for clear definitions of the components within the WHO criteria for HG malignancy.

Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas mistaken for gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A case report

Solid pseudopapillary epithelial neoplasms of the pancreas are rare entities, first described in 1959 by Frantz. These tumors represent less than 2% of pancreatic cancers and mainly affect young women. They can reach a significant size and its radiological features can lead to diagnostic pitfalls, such as gastrointestinal stromal tumors, which are rare soft-tissue sarcomas that can appear anywhere along the gastrointestinal tract. Clinicians and radiologists need to be aware of the existing diagnostic pitfalls between these two entities, because of their possible similarities. We report here the case of a 33-year-old woman with a solid pseudopapillary epithelial neoplasms of the pancreas initially misdiagnosed as an exophytic gastric stromal tumor.

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas in childhood and adolescence-an analysis of the German Registry for Rare Pediatric Tumors (STEP)

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) are the most common entity among pediatric pancreatic tumors. Still, these are rare tumors with an annual incidence of 0.1-0.2/1,000,000, and little is known about their optimal treatment. This analysis aimed to increase knowledge about the occurrence and treatment strategies of SPN in childhood. Data regarding diagnostics, treatment, and outcome of children aged 0-18 years with SPN recorded in the German Registry for Rare Pediatric Tumors (STEP) were analyzed. Thirty-eight patients were identified with a median age of 14.5 years at diagnosis (range: 8-18) and a female preponderance (81.6%). The most frequent location of the tumor was the pancreatic tail. In histopathological and immunohistochemical examination, pseudopapillary, solid, and cystic lesions as well as expression of beta-catenin, progesterone receptors, and cyclin D1 were the most common findings. All patients underwent surgical resection. Most patients underwent open resection, predominantly tail resection for tumors in the tail region and pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for tumors in the head region. The main postoperative sequela was exogenous pancreatic insufficiency (23.7%), especially with SPN in the pancreatic head. No recurrence occurred during follow-up, although two patients underwent resection with microscopic residue.

CONCLUSION

SPN of the pancreas in childhood are low-grade malignancies with usually favorable treatment outcomes. However, therapy can lead to relevant long-term sequelae. To prevent recurrence, complete surgical resection is recommended, sparing as much healthy pancreatic tissue as possible. Interdisciplinary collaboration between specialists is essential to optimize treatment. Molecular genetic analysis of these tumors could improve understanding of their genesis.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) of the pancreas are very rare tumors in childhood. • Little is known about tumorigenesis, and there are no specific guidelines for treatment and follow-up in pediatric patients.

WHAT IS NEW

• Characteristics, treatment, and outcome were comprehensively assessed in a large cohort of pediatric patients with SPN. • We propose recommendations for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of children with SPN, based on our analysis and considering published experience.

Non-colorectal liver metastases: A review of interventional and surgical treatment modalities

Liver metastases (LM) occur in up to 90% either simultaneously with the diagnosis of the primary tumor or at a later time-point. While resection of colorectal LM and resection or transplantation of neuroendocrine LM is part of a standard therapy with a 5-year patient survival of up to 80%, resection of non-colorectal and non-neuroendocrine LM is still discussed controversially. The reason for it is the significantly lower survival benefit of all different tumor entities depending on the biological aggressiveness of the tumor. Randomized controlled trials are lacking. However, reviews of case series with ≥100 liver resections are available. They show a 5-year patient survival of up to 42% compared to only <5% in patients without treatment. Risk factors for poor survival include the type of primary tumor, a short interval between resection of the primary tumor and liver resection, extrahepatic manifestation of the tumor, number and size of the LM, and extent of liver resection. Overall, it has recently been shown that a good patient selection, the technical advances in surgical therapy and the use of a risk score to predict the prognosis lead to a significantly better outcome so that it is no longer justified not to offer liver resection to patients with non-colorectal, non- endocrine LM. Since modern therapy of LM is multimodal, the optimal therapeutic approach is decided individually by a multidisciplinary team consisting of visceral surgeons, oncologists, interventional radiologists and radiologists as part of a tumor board.

Comparison of splenic vessel preserving distal pancreatectomy and the Warshaw technique for solid pseudopapillary neoplasm in children

PURPOSE

Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) such as splenic vessel preservation (SVP) for solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) in the body or tail of the pancreas in children prevents post-splenectomy infection and hematologic disorders. However, SVP could be technically challenging, and the Warshaw technique (WT) could be an alternative technique that has been reported to be safe and effective in adults. We, therefore, compared the perioperative outcomes of SVP and WT in pediatric patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of pediatric patients with SPN who underwent SPDP using SVP or WT between November 2002 and November 2018 at a large-sized tertiary referral center.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were included. Sixteen (57.1%) patients underwent SVP and 12 (42.9%) patients underwent WT. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the two groups. Postoperative complications occurred in 8 patients each in the SVP (50%), and the WT (66.7%) groups. Two (12.5%) in the SVP group and 1 (8.3%) in the WT group required additional intervention. During a median follow-up duration of 49 months, there were no significant differences in the incidence of splenic infarctions or perigastric varices between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in the surgical outcomes between WT and SVP in pediatric patients with SPN. WT could be a safe and feasible alternative technique for SVP in challenging cases.

[Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas in Children and Adolescents - Tailored Diagnostic and Operative Concepts in Four Patients]

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic tumors in children and adolescents are rare entities that can stay asymptomatic for long periods. They often become apparent as incidental findings or due to clinical symptoms, like abdominal pain. Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas (SPN) are rare representatives of this group, being low-grade malignant processes and requiring radical surgical treatment. We present four cases of SPN with different diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of four cases of SPN treated between 2015 and 2020 was performed.

RESULTS

Four female patients (11-17 years) were found to have SPN during diagnostic procedures. Three of them were located in the pancreatic head. Histological confirmation was obtained with endosonographic-, CT-guided and open biopsy, respectively. R0 resection was achieved by a pylorus preserving, partial duodenopancreatectomy according to Traverso-Longmire. In one patient the tumor was located in the pancreatic tail with tumor adherence to the splenic vessels. A CT guided biopsy confirmed an SPN. A distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy was performed. Follow-up (6 months - 6 years) revealed no evidence of tumor recurrence, metastasis, or pancreoprive diabetes.

CONCLUSION

For the treatment plan preoperative histological confirmation of SPN is necessary. Based on the tailored diagnostic and operative concepts, treatment at a center with a specialized pediatric surgery, pediatric oncology, pediatric gastroenterology, pediatric radiology and pathology is mandatory.

Solid pancreatic masses in children: A review of current evidence and clinical challenges

Pancreatic tumors in children are infrequently encountered in clinical practice. Their non-specific clinical presentation and overlapping imaging characteristics often make an accurate preoperative diagnosis difficult. Tumors are categorized as epithelial or non-epithelial, with epithelial tumors further classified as tumors of the exocrine or endocrine pancreas. Although both are tumors of the exocrine pancreas, solid pseudopapillary neoplasm is the most prevalent solid pancreatic tumor in children, while pancreatoblastoma is the most common malignant tumor. Insulinoma is the most common pediatric pancreatic tumor of the endocrine pancreas. Malignant tumors require a complete, often radical, surgical resection. However, pancreatic parenchyma-sparing surgical procedures are utilized for benign tumors and low-grade malignancy to preserve gland function. This review will discuss the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical and diagnostic characteristics, and management options associated with both common and rare solid pancreatic masses in children. We will also discuss current challenges encountered in their evaluation and treatment.

Laparoscopic Resection of Pediatric Solid Pseudopapillary Tumors of the Pancreas

BACKGROUND

Solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPTs) of the pancreas arise rarely in children, are often large, and can associate intimately with splenic vessels. Splenic preservation is a fundamental consideration when resecting distal SPT. Occasionally, the main splenic vessels must be divided to resect the SPT with negative margins, but the spleen can be preserved if the short gastric vessels remain intact (ie, Warshaw procedure). The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of distal pancreatectomy (DP) for SPT in children and to highlight 2 cases of splenic preservation using the Warshaw procedure.

METHODS

Patients 19 years and younger who were treated at a single children's hospital between July 2004 and January 2021 were examined. Patient characteristics were collected from the electronic medical record. A pediatric radiologist calculated SPT and pre- and post-operative (ie, non-infarcted) splenic volumes.

RESULTS

Eleven patients received DP for SPT. Six DPs were performed open and 5 laparoscopically. The spleen was preserved in 3 open and 4 laparoscopic DPs. A laparoscopic Warshaw procedure was performed in 2 patients. Laparoscopic resection associated with less frequent epidural use (P = .015), shorter time to full diet (P = .030), and post-operative length of stay (P = .009), compared to open resection. Average residual splenic volume after the laparoscopic Warshaw procedure was 70% of preoperative volume.

DISCUSSION

Laparoscopic DP for pediatric SPT achieved similar oncologic goals to open resection. Splenic preservation was feasible with laparoscopy in most cases and was successfully supplemented with the Warshaw procedure, which has not been previously reported for SPT resection in children.

Long-term outcome of pancreatic function following oncological surgery in children: Institutional experience and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neoplasms are uncommon in children and in most cases they are benign or have low malignant potential. Pancreatoblastoma and solid pseudopapillary tumor are the most frequent types in early and late childhood, respectively. Complete resection, although burdened by severe complications, is the only curative treatment for these diseases. Pancreatic surgery may result in impaired exocrine and endocrine pancreatic function. However, limited data are available on the long-term pediatric pancreatic function following surgical resection.

AIM

To investigate endocrine and exocrine pancreatic function and growth after oncological pancreatic surgery in a pediatric series.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all pediatric patients who underwent surgery for pancreatic neoplasm in our Institution from January 31, 2002 to the present was performed. Endocrine and exocrine insufficiency, auxological and fat-soluble vitamin status (A, D, E and clotting tests) were assessed at diagnosis and at every follow-up visit. Exocrine insufficiency was defined as steatorrhea with fecal elastase-1 < 200 µg/g stool, while endocrine insufficiency was identified as onset of Diabetes or Impaired Glucose Tolerance. Growth was evaluated based on body mass index (BMI) z-score trend.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (12 girls and 4 boys, mean age 10.7 ± 5.3 years), were included. Nine patients (56%) had a neoplasm in the pancreatic head, 4 in the body/tail, 2 in the tail and 1 in the body. Histological findings were as follows: Solid pseudopapillary tumor in 10 patients (62.5%), insulinoma in 2 patients, neuroendocrine tumor in 2 patients and acinar cell carcinoma in 2 patients. The most frequent surgery was pancreaticoduodenectomy (50%). Exocrine failure occurred in 4 patients (25%) and endocrine failure in 2 patients (12.5%). Exocrine insufficiency occurred early (within 6 mo after surgery) and endocrine insufficiency later (8 and 10 years after surgery). Mean BMI z-score was 0.36 ± 1.1 at diagnosis and 0.27 ± 0.95 at the last assessment. Vitamin D was insufficient (< 30 ng/mL) in 8 of the 16 patients during the follow-up period. Vitamins A, E and clotting test were into the normal ranges in all patients.

CONCLUSION

Careful and long-term monitoring should follow any pancreatic surgery, to recognize and promptly treat exocrine and endocrine pancreatic insufficiency, which can occur after surgery.

Surgery of pancreas tumors in pediatric and adolescent patients: a single institution experience in South America

PURPOSE

Pancreas tumors are extremely rare in pediatric and adolescent patients. Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment; however, the data are limited with respect to morbidity and mortality. We aimed to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes of pediatric and adolescent patients who underwent surgical resection of pancreatic tumors.

METHODS

Patients [Formula: see text] 18-year-olds who underwent resection of pancreas tumor at the National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases INEN during 2000-2020 were included.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were diagnosed; 28 patients were female and 6 were male. The median age was 13.4-years-old. Histological diagnosis was solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) (n = 29, 85.3%), pancreatoblastoma (n = 3), neuroendocrine carcinoma (n = 1), and insulinoma (n = 1). No patient experienced postoperative mortality and 15 (44.1%) patients developed postoperative complications including pancreatic fistula as the most frequent. Under a median follow-up period of 33.8 (0.5-138) months, four (11.8%) patients died. Of the 29 patients with SPN, the 3- and-5-year OS rates were 100% and 83.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

SPN was the most frequent cause of surgical treatment for pediatric and adolescent patients in the high-volume cancer center in Peru and was associated with favorable survival. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was safely performed in this patient group with acceptable morbidity and zero mortality.

Pancreatic resection in the pediatric, adolescent and young adult population: nationwide analysis on complications

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine pancreatic surgery specific short- and long-term complications of pediatric, adolescent and young adult (PAYA) patients who underwent pancreatic resection, as compared to a comparator cohort of adults.

METHODS

A nationwide retrospective cohort study was performed in PAYA patients who underwent pancreatic resection between 2007 and 2016. PAYA was defined as all patients <40 years at time of surgery. Pancreatic surgery-specific complications were assessed according to international definitions and textbook outcome was determined.

RESULTS

A total of 230 patients were included in the PAYA cohort (112 distal pancreatectomies, 99 pancreatoduodenectomies), and 2526 patients in the comparator cohort. For pancreatoduodenectomy, severe morbidity (29.3% vs. 28.6%; P = 0.881), in-hospital mortality (1% vs. 4%; P = 0.179) and textbook outcome (62% vs. 58%; P = 0.572) were comparable between the PAYA and the comparator cohort. These outcomes were also similar for distal pancreatectomy. After pancreatoduodenectomy, new-onset diabetes mellitus (8% vs. 16%) and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (27% vs. 73%) were lower in the PAYA cohort when compared to adult literature.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic surgery-specific complications were comparable with patients ≥40 years. Development of endocrine and exocrine insufficiency in PAYA patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy, however, was substantially lower compared to adult literature.

Prediction of Recurrence of Completely Resected Pancreatic Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms in Pediatric Patients: A Single Center Analysis

Background: Many previous studies have investigated the risk factors for the recurrence of pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs), although a consensus has not yet been reached, despite this effort. We aimed to identify the predictive factors for recurrence in patients with SPNs who underwent complete surgical resection of the tumor. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of pediatric patients with SPNs who underwent surgical resection at a single center between 2001 and 2018. Results: During the study period, 47 patients with SPNs underwent radical resection of the tumor. The median age of the patients was 14 (8–18) years. R0 resection was confirmed in every case and none of the patients presented with systemic metastasis at the time of diagnosis. The median follow-up period was 53.1 (30.8–150.8) months. Of the 47 patients, only two (4.2%) experienced recurrence. Using comparative analysis, we found that some factors such as a large tumor size, peripancreatic tissue invasion, and capsule invasion did not increase the risk of recurrence of SPNs. Lymph node metastasis was the only significant factor for recurrence in our study (p = 0.043). Conclusion: During our single center analysis, we found that only lymph node metastasis was a predictive factor for recurrence of SPNs among patients who underwent complete tumor resection. Long-term follow-up is required to determine whether SPNs will recur if lymph node metastasis is observed after surgery. Furthermore, therapeutic benefits of routine lymphadenectomy or sentinel lymph node biopsy should be investigated in future studies to reduce the risk of recurrence in patients with SPNs.

Pancreatectomies for pediatric pancreatic tumors: A single institute experience from 2007 to 2018

BACKGROUND

To investigate the safety, feasibility, and complications of pancreatectomies for pediatric pancreatic tumors.

METHODS

The medical records of pancreatectomy patients from January 2007 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed for perioperative factors and complications. Patients were divided into pancreatic head (n = 43), body (n = 18) and tail (n = 43) groups.

RESULTS

Seventy-two girls and 32 boys (median age 10 years at diagnosis, range: 0-15 years) were enrolled and had solid pseudopapillary tumors (n = 73), pancreatoblastoma (n = 19), neuroendocrine tumors (n = 9), and others. Primary surgical procedures included pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 10) and distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (n = 4), and organ-sparing resection procedures included duodenum-preserving pancreas head resection (n = 25), middle segmental pancreatic resection (n = 15), spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (n = 37) and local enucleation (n = 13), with a median blood loss of 20 cm³ (range: 10-300 cm³). Short-term complications included pancreatic fistula (35.6%), bile leakage (2.9%), intraabdominal infection (21.2%), delayed gastric emptying (23.1%), and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (5.8%). After a median follow-up of 38 months (range: 3-143 months), 94 patients (90.4%) were alive without tumor recurrence, 2 were alive after tumor recurrence, 1 pancreatoblastoma patient died from tumor recurrence, and 7 were lost to follow-up. Only 14 patients (14/96, 14.6%) had long-term complications at the outpatient follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection was the main treatment for pancreatic tumors. Organ-sparing resection procedures led to good long-term results for pediatric pancreatic tumors, even if these procedures could cause a relatively high incidence of short-term complications (especially pancreatic fistula and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy for the treatment of pancreatic neoplasms in children: A Pediatric Surgical Oncology Research Collaborative study

BACKGROUND

To better characterize short-term and long-term outcomes in children with pancreatic tumors treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

METHODS

Patients 21 years of age or younger who underwent PD at Pediatric Surgical Oncology Collaborative (PSORC) hospitals between 1990 and 2017 were identified. Demographic, clinical information, and outcomes (operative complications, long-term pancreatic function, recurrence, and survival) were collected.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients from 18 institutions with a median age of 13 years (4 months-22 years) and a median (IQR) follow-up of 2.8 (4.3) years were analyzed. Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas (SPN) was the most common histology. Postoperative complications included pancreatic leak in 14% (n = 9), delayed gastric emptying in 9% (n = 6), marginal ulcer in one patient, and perioperative (30-day) death due to hepatic failure in one patient. Pancreatic insufficiency was observed in 32% (n = 21) of patients, with 23%, 3%, and 6% with exocrine, or endocrine insufficiencies, or both, respectively. Children with SPN and benign neoplasms all survived. Overall, there were 14 (22%) recurrences and 11 deaths (17%). Univariate analysis revealed non-SPN malignant tumor diagnosis, preoperative vascular involvement, intraoperative transfusion requirement, pathologic vascular invasion, positive margins, and need for neoadjuvant chemotherapy as risk factors for recurrence and poor survival. Multivariate analysis only revealed pathologic vascular invasion as a risk factor for recurrence and poor survival.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest series of pediatric PD patients. PD is curative for SPN and benign neoplasms. Pancreatic insufficiency is the most common postoperative complication. Outcome is primarily associated with histology.

Treatment patterns and outcomes for pancreatic tumors in children: an analysis of the National Cancer Database

PURPOSE

Pancreatic tumors are rare in children and limited data are available regarding incidence, treatment, and outcomes. We aim to describe patient and tumor characteristics and to report on survival of these diseases.

METHODS

Children with pancreatic tumors were queried from the National Cancer Database (2004-2014). The association between treatment and hazard of death was assessed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model.

RESULTS

We identified 109 children with pancreatic tumors; 52% were male and median age at diagnosis was 14 years. Tumors were distributed as follows: pseudopapillary neoplasm (30%), endocrine tumors (27%), pancreatoblastoma (16%), pancreatic adenocarcinoma (16%), sarcoma (6%) and neuroblastoma (5%). Seventy-nine patients underwent surgery, of which 76% achieved R0 resection. Most patients (85%) had lymph nodes examined, of which 22% had positive nodes. Five-year overall survival by tumor histology was 95% (pseudopapillary neoplasm), 75% (neuroblastoma), 70% (pancreatoblastoma), 51% (endocrine tumors), 43% (sarcoma), and 34% (adenocarcinoma). On multivariable analysis, surgical resection was the strongest predictor of survival (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.10-0.68, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Overall survival of children with pancreatic tumors is grim, with varying survival rates among different tumors. Surgical resection is associated with improved long-term survival.

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: a report of 10 cases and literature review

BACKGROUND

Solid pseudopapillary tumour of the pancreas (SPTP) is a rare pancreatic tumour characterized by a non-specific clinical presentations and vague radiologic features. The aim of this study is to identify these tumours from other pancreatic neoplasms because complete resection is curative in most cases and provides long-term survival.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients operated for SPTP between January 2000 and December 2018 was conducted. The collected data included age, gender, clinical findings, laboratory tests, radiological findings, anatomopathological examination, immunohistochemistry results, surgical treatment, mortality, morbidity and recurrence.

RESULTS

Ten cases of SPTP have been diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2018 representing 5.1% of all pancreatic tumours operated during this period (male/female: 2/8; median age 41.2 years; range 19-78 years). The most common symptom was abdominal pain and physical examination was normal in four of 10 cases. The most common tumour localization was the tail of the pancreas. The main tumour size was 7.2 cm (range 2-15 cm). One patient had abdominal disseminated disease. Surgical interventions were distal pancreatectomy in five cases, enucleation in one case, cephalic duodeno-pancreatectomy in two cases, central pancreatectomy in one case and pancreatic biopsy in one case. Only one patient received adjuvant chemotherapy. During follow-up, one patient died after 12 months and another developed unique hepatic metastasis that was resected.

CONCLUSION

Although it is delayed in diagnosis, the overall prognosis of these tumours remains good even with local recurrence and metastasis. Complete surgical resection is the treatment of choice even in cases of recurrence.

Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy of a Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor (SPT) Achieves Long-Term Oncologic Safety and Multiorgan Preservation

The oncological safety of a laparoscopic approach for solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPTs) of the pancreas remains a matter of debate. We present the long-term follow-up of an adolescent girl with an SPT in the pancreatic tail. A multimodality workup including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a complex, spherical mass of 4.4 cm × 3.6 cm × 4 cm most likely located in the pancreatic tail. All routine laboratory investigations and tumor markers were within normal limits (alpha fetoprotein [AFP], cancer antigen 125 [CA125], CA 19-9, carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA], adrenocorticotropic hormone [ACTH]). Diagnostic laparoscopy was performed to verify the origin of the tumor in the pancreatic tail. In a three-port technique the tumor was mobilized of the splenic vessels until a distal pancreatectomy could be completed. Histopathological examination confirmed the complete resection of a low-grade malignant SPT. The postoperative course was unremarkable. Regular pediatric oncological follow-up examinations for 3 years, including MRI every 6 months, ruled out recurrence and confirmed preservation of splenic and pancreatic functions. While data about the technical feasibility of a laparoscopic approach to pancreatic SPT are already available, this pediatric case report adds a long-term oncological and functional success to the available literature.

Indications and outcomes of duodenum-preserving resection of the pancreatic head in children

AIM OF STUDY

Duodenum-preserving resection of the pancreatic head (DPRPH) with Roux-en-Y pancreatojejunostomy is a procedure used to remove focal pathological lesions of the pancreatic head. Although predominantly used in adult patients, it is both safe and effective in children. The aim of this study was to review our experience with this procedure, with focus on its indications, complications and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of pediatric patients who underwent DPRPH between 1994 and 2015 was performed. Patient files were reviewed for demographic, diagnostic, operative and histological details, postoperative complications. Patients were contacted telephonically and sent questionnaires to determine long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

The study cohort consists of 21 patients, 14 girls and 7 boys, with an average age of 11.72 years (range 3 months to 18.6 years), who underwent DPRPH with end-to-end anastomosis of the jejunum to the pancreatic body (Roux-en-Y anastomosis). In four cases the head and also part of the body of the pancreas was resected. In the remaining 17 cases, only the head of the pancreas was resected. Indications for DPRPH were solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas (n = 10), trauma (n = 8), pancreas divisum (n = 1), focal congenital hyperinsulinism (n = 1) and pancreatic cyst (n = 1). The length of follow-up ranged from 1 to 22 years (average 9.66). One patient developed a biliary fistula, which closed spontaneously within 2 weeks after stent insertion. A recurrence of abdominal pain was reported in two patients, occurring at 7 months after the operation in one patient and at 1 year in the other. Pancreatic endocrine insufficiency did not occur in any of the 21 patients. Seven patients currently require a low fat diet, five of which need pancreatic enzyme supplementation. An additional two patients need enzyme supplementation without dietary restriction.

CONCLUSION

DPRPH is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of large focal pathological lesions of the pancreatic head in children. As a less invasive procedure than pancreatoduodenectomy, it is more appropriate for the developing child.

Suggested Indications for Enucleation of Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms in Pediatric Patients

Background: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) are rare, low-grade, malignant neoplasms that can occur in pediatric patients. Although complete resection of the tumor is the principle treatment, SPN enucleation (EN) has been reported to be effective in children. This study aimed to examine the feasibility and safety of EN by comparing it with conventional pancreatectomy (CP), and to present the indications for its use in pediatric patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 66 patients who underwent surgery for SPN at our institution from October 1992 to April 2018. Surgical methods, postoperative complications, hospital stay, and recurrence were compared. Results: Of the 66 patients, 15 (22.7%) were treated with EN and 51 (77.3%) were treated with CP. The mean duration of EN operation was 262 min (±145 min) and of CP was 345 min (±195 min). There was no statistically significant difference between the two methods (P = 0.13). To objectively compare the mass size between patients, we introduced a tumor size/intraperitoneal width ratio, which also revealed no significant difference between the 2 surgery groups (P = 0.21). The EN group had one case of recurrence at the resection site. The complications observed were fluid collection, splenic infarctions, hematomas, pancreatic fistulas, portal vein thromboses, and chylous drainage, among which pancreatic fistulas were the most frequent followed by moderate-severe fistulas in the EN group (P < 0.001). The mean postoperative fasting time (EN 17.0 ± 8.7 days vs. CP 5.1 ± 3.3 days, P < 0.001) and mean hospital stay (EN 23.4 ± 10.0 days vs. CP 13.2 ± 6.5 days, P = 0.002) showed statistically significant differences. Conclusion: Compared with CP treatment, EN of SPNs in children has the disadvantages of prolonged fasting times and hospital stays to recover from moderate pancreatic fistulas. However, if appropriate indications are applied, EN can be considered a safe and effective surgical procedure for children.

Whipple's Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Pediatric Patients: An Experience from a Tertiary Care Center

Purpose:

Whipple's pancreaticoduodenectomy (WPD) is rarely required in children. However, WPD is the only option with pathologies involving the head of the pancreas requiring surgical excision. The objective of our study was to review our experience with WPD performed on children.

Materials and Methods:

A retrospective analysis of case records was conducted on all patients <18 years of age, who underwent WPD at our center over the last 20 years. Data regarding demographics, signs, and symptoms at presentation, diagnostic imaging and procedures, pathologic reports, surgical and medical treatment, and follow-up were collected to study the indications and safety and outcomes of WPD in children.

Results:

Five patients had been planned for a WPD during the study (1995–2015); but in one patient, the procedure was abandoned, the rest four patients formed the study group. Male to female ratio was 3:1. Median age at the time of surgery was 9 years (11 months–12 years). The most common presentation was obstructive jaundice (50%, 2/4). Radiological imaging was able to accurately predict the surgical procedure required in all except one case. The mean operating time was 205 min (180–240 min). There were no intraoperative complications. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 85 mL (20–150 mL). The youngest patient requiring WPD was an 11-month-old child. Oral feeding was established by the 7^th postoperative day (range 5–7 days) in all cases. There were no cases of anastomotic leak or pancreatic or jejunal fistulae. One patient developed features of subacute intestinal obstruction after discharge and required re-exploration. There was no intra- or post-operative mortality.

Conclusion:

WPD is safe and efficacious procedure in a selected group of children. The overall efficacy of surgical treatment combined with the relatively low severity of complications leads us to recommend WPD in children when indicated.

Solid Pseudo-Papillary Tumor Mimicking as Complicated Pseudocyst: Multimodality Imaging and Pathological Correlation

Pancreatic neoplasm is very rare in the pediatric population. Malignant tumors represent less than 0.2% of pediatric cancer-related mortality. Pancreas lesions can be from exocrine or endocrine origin or present themselves as cystic masses. Clinical, biological, and radiological findings usually are sufficient to establish diagnosis, but in some cases, they may be misleading. We present the case of a young patient presenting a pancreatic mass where anatomical and metabolic characteristics of the lesion were discordant to the final diagnosis.

Solid pseudopapillary and malignant pancreatic tumors in childhood: A systematic review and evidence quality assessment

A systematic review of 32 studies reporting on 489 children with pancreatic tumors was performed. The most prevalent histologic subtype was solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT) (61.3%). Pancreaticoduodenectomy was the most commonly performed operation (48%). Neoadjuvant chemo/radiotherapy was utilized in 3.9, 36.2, 25, and 27.8% of patients with SPTs, pancreatoblastomas (PBLs), neuroendocrine tumors, and exocrine carcinomas, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy (75.6%) and radiation (34%) were most commonly utilized in PBLs. All-cause mortality was highest in exocrine carcinomas (50%). Overall, 98.8% of patients with SPTs survived. PBL exhibited the highest recurrence rate (14.7%) within a mean of 23.5 months.

Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas in Children and Adults: A National Study of 369 Patients

BACKGROUND

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas is a rare tumor in children, with current evidence limited to single-center studies. We examined treatment and clinical outcomes for pediatric and adult SPN with a national data set.

METHODS

The 2004 to 2013 National Cancer Data Base was queried to identify all patients diagnosed with SPN. The cohort was stratified by age (pediatric and adult) defined as below 18 years and 18 years and above, respectively. Baseline characteristics and unadjusted outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

We identified 21 pediatric and 348 adult patients with SPN. Both groups displayed similar demographic composition. Patients were commonly female (90.5% [pediatric] vs. 85.9% [adult], P=0.56) and white (66.7% vs. 68.3%, P=0.74). Tumor location was similar between adults and children. Median tumor size was similar between children and adults (5.9 vs. 4.9 cm, P=0.41). Treatment strategies did not vary between groups. Partial pancreatectomy was the most common resection strategy (71.4% vs. 53.1%, P=0.80). Both groups experienced low mortality (0.0% vs. 0.7% at 5 y, P=0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides the largest comparison of pediatric and adult SPN to date. Children with SPN have similar disease severity at presentation, receive similar treatments, and demonstrate equivalent postoperative outcomes compared with their adult counterparts.

Solid pseudopapillary tumour (Frantz's tumour) of the pancreas in childhood: successful management of late liver metastases with sunitinib and chemoembolisation

The patient is a girl aged 17 years who originally presented at age 11 years with a solid pseudopapillary tumour (SPT) in the head of the pancreas treated by an R0 pylorus-preserving Whipple procedure. The patient underwent surveillance CT every 3 months for the first year followed by MRI every 6 months. She was noted to have a new liver lesion in Couinaud segment VI highly suspicious for metastasis at 30 months. Liver wedge biopsy confirmed metastatic SPT. Two months later two new lesions were noted in Couinaud segment VII. The family preferred medical management to surgery resulting in a treatment combination of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib and hepatic artery embolisation. The patient developed a hepatic abscess following embolisation but recovered with antibiotics. The patient has subsequently been followed with serial MRIs every 3 months, and 20 months following chemoembolisation, she has no evidence of recurrence of the metastases.

Enucleation of solid pseudopapillary tumor with a preoperative nasopancreatic drainage stent in a child

Solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT) is a rare pancreatic tumor with low-grade malignancy in children. A complete surgical resection can achieve a favorable prognosis. Although several reports have indicated that enucleation is considered a safe and effective treatment, the most significant complication is injury to the main pancreatic duct. The usefulness and safety of tumor enucleation after preoperative placement of an endoscopic nasopancreatic drainage stent (NPDS) has recently been reported. We present the case of SPT in a 10-year-old girl. To avoid and detect injury to the main pancreatic duct during operation, an NPDS was endoscopically placed before laparotomy. The patient underwent a complete enucleation of the tumor with the guidance of an NPDS. Our case is the first report of a successful enucleation of an SPT with a preoperative placement of an NPDS. This procedure may lead to safe enucleation of a pancreatic tumor with low malignancy, such as SPT, in children.

Radical resection and enucleation in Chinese adolescents with pancreatic tumors: A 15-year case series

Pancreatic tumors rarely occur in adolescents, and the appropriateness of radical resection for these patients remains controversial.Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for patients younger than 19 years who underwent radical resection or limited resection (enucleation) between 2000 and 2015. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, operative details, growth, and survival were analyzed.During the study period, 11 adolescents (mean age, 16.18 years; standard deviation, 1.99; interquartile range, 15.0-18.0) underwent radical resection (n = 7) or enucleation (n = 4) to treat solid pseudopapillary tumors (n = 5), pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (n = 5), or pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (n = 1). None of the 7 patients who underwent radical resection experienced recurrence or serious complications, while 3 of 4 patients who underwent enucleation experienced recurrence (P = 0.02). Recurrence-free survival was slightly longer in patients who underwent radical resection, and this procedure did not appear to affect adolescent growth and development.Radical resection might be safe and effective for adolescents with pancreatic tumors.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pediatric and adolescent pancreatic malignancy: A single-center retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

While pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has been extensively studied in adults, there are few data pertaining specifically to pediatric patients. We retrospectively analyzed PD-associated morbidity and mortality in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Our analytic cohort included all consecutive patients ≤18years of age treated at our institution from 1993 to 2015 who underwent PD. Patient data (demographics, disease characteristics, surgical and adjuvant treatment, length of hospital stay, and postoperative course) were extracted from the medical records.

RESULTS

We identified 12 children with a median age of 9years (7 female, 5 male). Final diagnoses were pancreatoblastoma (n=3), solid pseudopapillary tumor (n=3), neuroblastoma (n=2), rhabdomyosarcoma (n=2), and neuroendocrine carcinoma (n=2). Four patients underwent PD for resection of recurrent disease. 75% (9/12 patients) received neoadjuvant therapy. The median operative time was approximately 7hours with a mean blood loss of 590cm³. The distal pancreas was invaginated into the posterior stomach (n=3) or into the jejunum (n=5) or was directly sewn to the jejunal mucosa (n=4). There were no operative deaths. There were 4 patients (34%) with grade II complications, 1 with a grade IIIb complication (chest tube), and 1 with a grade IV complication (reexploration). The most common long-term morbidity was pancreas exocrine supplementation (n=10; 83%). Five patients (42%) diagnosed with either solid pseudopapillary tumor or rhabdomyosarcoma are currently alive with a mean survival of 77.4months.

CONCLUSION

Pancreaticoduodenectomy is a feasible management strategy for pediatric pancreatic malignancies and is associated with acceptable morbidity and overall survival. Long-term outcome is mostly dependent on histology of the tumor.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV; retrospective study with no comparison group.

Recurrence of Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms of the Pancreas: Results of a Nationwide Study of Risk Factors and Treatment Modalities

BACKGROUND

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas (SPPN) can relapse very late, but little is known about risk factors for recurrence and optimal treatment. We aimed to identify risk factors for recurrence and to analyze treatment modalities in all French pediatric cases of SPPN over the past 20 years.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data were collected from pediatric oncologists and surgeons, and also from adult pancreatic surgeons in order to identify late recurrences.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients (41 girls) were identified. Median age at diagnosis was 13.1 years [8.7-17.9]. Abdominal pain was the commonest presenting symptom (32/49, 65%). The tumor was located in the pancreatic head in 24 patients (47%). Preoperative biopsy or cytology was performed in 14 cases (28%). All patients were operated with a median of 23 days [0-163] after diagnosis. The rate of postoperative morbidity was 29%. With a median follow-up of 65 months [0.3-221], the overall and event-free survival was 100% and 71%, respectively. Seven patients (13.7%) relapsed with a median of 43 months [33-94] after initial surgery. Six were treated surgically, either alone (n = 3) or with perioperative chemotherapy (n = 2) or hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (n = 1). One patient in whom further treatment was not feasible was still alive at last news. Risk factors for recurrence were positive surgical margins (P = 0.03) and age less than 13.5 years at diagnosis (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

SPPN recurrence in this pediatric series was a rare and late event that did not undermine overall survival. Complete surgical removal of recurrent tumors appears to be the best option.

Pancreatic surgery for tumors in children and adolescents

PURPOSE

Pancreatic neoplasms are uncommon in children. This study sought to analyze the clinical and pathological features of surgically resected pancreatic tumors in children and discuss management strategies.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients ≤21 years with pancreatic neoplasms who underwent surgery at a single institution between 1995 and 2015.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were identified with a median age at operation of 16.6 years (IQR 13.5-18.9). The most common histology was solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) (n = 13), followed by pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (n = 3), serous cystadenoma (n = 2) and pancreatoblastoma (n = 1). Operative procedures included formal pancreatectomy (n = 17), enucleation (n = 1) and central pancreatectomy (n = 1). SPNs were noninvasive in all but one case with perineural, vascular and lymph node involvement. Seventeen patients (89.5 %) are currently alive and disease free at a median follow-up of 5.7 (IQR 3.7-10.9) years. Two patients died: one with metastatic insulinoma and another with SPN who developed peritoneal carcinomatosis secondary to a concurrent rectal adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric pancreatic tumors are a heterogeneous group of neoplastic lesions for which surgery can be curative. SPN is the most common histology, is characterized by low malignant potential and in selected cases can be safely and effectively treated with a tissue-sparing resection and minimally invasive approach.

Gastric outlet obstruction secondary to solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas in an eight year old child. Report of a case

Background

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm is a rare cystic tumor of the exocrine pancreas. Abdominal pain or discomfort is the most common symptom, usually in young females.

Case presentation

Herein we report the case of an 8 - year old child presenting with symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction.

Conclusion

A solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreatic caput was diagnosed and surgically removed.

Solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas in children: can we predict malignancy?

PURPOSE

We aimed to review clinical and histologic findings of solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) in children and determine the predictive factor of the malignancy.

METHOD

The records of 45 patients (9 males, 36 females) who underwent surgery for SPN in the Asan Medical Center from 1992 to 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. We analyzed the factors between histologic benign group (n=36) and malignant group (n=9).

RESULTS

The mean age of children was 14.9±3.15years (range 9-20years). Mean size of the tumor was 6.36±3.61cm, and most common site in the pancreas was the tail (n=23). Three patients had distant metastasis at initial diagnosis. The sites were the liver (n=2) and the omentum (n=1). All patients underwent complete resection, and the median follow up period was 34months. Recurrence (n=4) was more common in the malignant group (p<0.05). We calculated the proportion of solid component by manual volumetry with a CT scan. The median value was 41.5% in benign group and 88.4% in malignant group. On comparative analysis, the proportion of solid component was found to have significant association with malignancy (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Histologic malignant SPN has high risk of recurrence. We should consider more radical resection when finding a predominantly solid tumor in a CT scan.

Imaging of pediatric pancreatic neoplasms with radiologic-histopathologic correlation

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to describe the imaging features of pediatric pancreatic tumors with pathologic correlation. Epithelial and nonepithelial lesions are described. Pancreatic imaging protocols, clinical presentation, and management are also detailed.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic neoplasms are rare in children and vary widely between benign and malignant causes and between cystic and solid lesions. Epithelial tumors are most common and include solid pseudopapillary tumor, pancreatoblastoma, islet cell neoplasms, and cystic lesions.

Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas in children: surgical intervention strategies based on pathological findings

PURPOSE

The appropriate surgical intervention strategies for solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT) of the pancreas in children are still controversial. The aim of this study was to establish surgical intervention strategies based on the pathological findings.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent surgery for SPT between January 1994 and April 2013.

RESULTS

Five patients with SPT were identified. Tumors were located in the pancreatic head (n = 1), body (n = 2) and tail (n = 2). One patient showed spleen, liver and lung metastases. All five patients underwent pancreatectomy. Enucleation was not performed. One patient with metastases underwent partial hepatectomy. Four tumors had infiltration into the adjacent pancreatic parenchyma. The main pancreatic duct was incorporated into the tumor capsule wall in two patients. Surgical margins were negative in all patients without metastases. The median follow-up period was 37.8 months (range 7-74 months). One patient with metastases died at 60 months after surgery. All other patients were alive and showed no evidence of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Radical resection with negative margins should be performed for SPT. From the perspective of curability, we suggest that pancreatectomy is the first choice for SPT in children.

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy to treat solid pseudopapillary tumors in children: transition from open to laparoscopic approaches in suitable cases

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) in the treatment of solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPT) in children.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 22 patients under 18 years of age who underwent a distal pancreatectomy for SPT between January 1995 and December 2012.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients and eight patients underwent LDP and open distal pancreatectomy (ODP), respectively, and 71.4 % of the LDP and 25.0 % of the ODP procedures were spleen-sparing operations. The median duration of surgery in the LDP group was shorter than that in the ODP group [175 (range 120-540) vs. 257 (range 200-305) min, p = 0.024]. There were no differences in postoperative complications. The LDP patients commenced oral intake earlier than the ODP patients [2.0 (range 1.0-7.0) vs. 4.0 (range 3.0-12.0) days, p = 0.010], and had an earlier discharge from hospital [7.0 (range 5.0-20.0) vs. 13.0 (range 7.0-22.0) days, p = 0.009].

CONCLUSION

LDP treatment for SPT in children is associated with a shorter hospitalization and a shorter time to oral intake compared to ODP. LDP is a safe and feasible option for SPT in select pediatric patients.

Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas in children: 15-year experience at a single institution with assays using an immunohistochemical panel

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyze the clinicopathological characteristics of solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT) of the pancreas and to utilize an immunohistochemical panel to identify specific markers of the disease.

METHODS

Eleven patients diagnosed with and treated for SPT of the pancreas over the past 15 years were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The 11 patients consisted of 8 females and 3 males, of mean age at operation of 13.5 years (range, 10 to 18 years). The most frequent presenting symptom was abdominal pain and/or mass. One patient was referred with hemoperitoneum due to traumatic tumor rupture. The lesions were located in the body, head and tail of the pancreas in four, four, and three patients, respectively. Mean tumor diameter was 7.9 cm (range, 2.5 to 15 cm). Surgical procedures included distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy in four patients, pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy in four, distal pancreatectomy in two, and subtotal pancreatectomy with splenectomy in one. Mean follow-up was 60.5 months (range, 15 to 126 months). All patients remain alive without tumor recurrence. Immunohistochemical staining showed that all tumors were positive for β-catenin, progesterone receptor (PR), vimentin, and CD99. However, all tumors were negative for E-cadherin and cytokeratin 7 expression.

CONCLUSION

Patients with SPT of the pancreas have an excellent prognosis after surgical excision. Immunohistochemically, E-cadherin/β-catenin, PR, vimentin, and CD99 would help establish the diagnosis of SPT of the pancreas, although the results of immunohistochemical staining were found to have an indistinct complex immunoprofile.

Solid pseudopapillary tumour (Frantz's tumour) of the pancreas in childhood

An 11-year-old girl presented with acute pancreatitis and mass in the head of the pancreas. MRI revealed a heterogeneous right-upper quadrant retroperitoneal mass measuring 6.8×6.1×5.5 cm arising from the pancreatic head. Endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspirate revealed a solid pseudopapillary tumour (SPT) of the pancreas. The patient underwent a pylorus-preserving Whipple procedure. Pathology confirmed SPT. First described by Frantz, SPT represents less than 3% of all exocrine tumours. It is especially rare in children and shows different clinical features compared with adults. In our patient, tumour cells were arranged at the periphery of fibrovascular cores, but they did not show definite gland formation, keratinisation or cytoplasmic pigment accumulation. A periodic acid-Schiff stain without diastase did not show appreciable glycogen within the tumour cells, classic for Frantz's tumour. The literature, diagnosis, management and pathogenesis on this rare entity in children are reviewed and discussed.

Laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy for solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas

AIM: To compare short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy for solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT) of the pancreas.

METHODS: This retrospective study included 28 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy for SPT of the pancreas between 1998 and 2012. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach: the laparoscopic surgery group and the open surgery group. The patients’ demographic data, operative results, pathological reports, hospital courses, morbidity and mortality, and follow-up data were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS: Fifteen patients with SPT of the pancreas underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP), and 13 underwent open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups except for a female predominance in the LDP group (100.0% vs 69.2%, P = 0.035). Mortality, morbidity (33.3% vs 38.5%, P = 1.000), pancreatic fistula rates (26.7% vs 30.8%, P = 0.728), and reoperation rates (0.0% vs 7.7%, P = 0.464) were similar in the two groups. There were no significant differences in the operating time (171 min vs 178 min, P = 0.755) between the two groups. The intraoperative blood loss (149 mL vs 580 mL, P = 0.002), transfusion requirement (6.7% vs 46.2%, P = 0.029), first flatus time (1.9 d vs 3.5 d, P = 0.000), diet start time (2.3 d vs 4.9 d, P = 0.000), and postoperative hospital stay (8.1 d vs 12.8 d, P = 0.029) were significantly less in the LDP group than in the ODP group. All patients had negative surgical margins at final pathology. There were no significant differences in number of lymph nodes harvested (4.6 vs 6.4, P = 0.549) between the two groups. The median follow-up was 33 (3-100) mo for the LDP group and 45 (17-127) mo for the ODP group. All patients were alive with one recurrence.

CONCLUSION: LDP for SPT has short-term benefits compared with ODP. Long-term outcomes of LDP are similar to those of ODP.

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas in children: a 15-year experience and the identification of a unique immunohistochemical marker

PURPOSE

To review our 15-year experience in the management of children with solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPPN) of the pancreas at a single pediatric institution, to delineate a unique immunohistochemical marker for SPPN, and to analyze cumulative data on this rare entity in the literature.

METHODS

We did a retrospective analysis of the demographic data, clinical presentation, immunohistochemical characteristics, surgical approach, and long-term outcomes of all patients diagnosed with SPPN between 1997 and 2012.

RESULTS

There were 6 patients in the series, 5 females and 1 male. Median age at presentation and at surgery was 15 years (11-18 years). Abdominal pain was the presenting symptom in 5 cases and jaundice in 1 case. Two patients had a pancreatic head tumor and underwent a pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Two patients had the tumor in the pancreatic tail and underwent a distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy. Two patients had the tumor in the pancreatic body and underwent a distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy in one case and with preservation of the spleen in the other. All tumors were completely resected with pathologic margins free of disease. The median maximum diameter was 6.8 cm (3 to 15 cm). On immunohistochemistry the tumors exhibited different combinations of non-specific markers like chromogranin, vimentin and neuron-specific enolase, but all tumors showed the highly SPPN-specific paranuclear dot-like immunoreactivity pattern for CD99 in the solid as well as in the pseudopapillary areas. No patient had metastasis at presentation. Median follow-up was 6.5 years (6 months to 15 years). There were no recurrences, no long-term metastasis, and all patients are disease-free.

CONCLUSION

Our series supports the concept that complete resection is necessary to achieve the best possible long-term results. Additionally, we demonstrate that SPPN exhibits a very unique immunostaining pattern for CD99 that is present in all cases.

Natural history and malignant risk factors of solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPTs) of the pancreas are unusual neoplasms of uncertain prognosis. Most patients with SPTs have a good prognosis after undergoing surgical resection, but there are rare cases in which a locally infiltrative growth pattern and metastatic variety are exhibited, or recurrence of the disease after surgery occurs; these cases have been reported with very poor clinical outcomes. Our study investigated the natural history of SPTs and delineated the clinicopathologic features that may predict the malignancy potential of the disease.

METHODS

A total of 100 patients with suspected SPTs were enrolled in our study and 77 patients underwent surgical resection. A resulting 60 tumors were pathologically proven to be SPTs and the affected patients were followed-up regularly after surgery. Clinical and pathologic data for all 100 patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 60 total patients with histologically positive SPTs, 55 (92%) were women and 5 (8%) were men. The median patient age was 34 years (range, 13-77 years). Among the 60 patients, 9 had malignant SPTs and 51 had benign SPTs. Deep parenchymal invasion into the surrounding tissue was the most frequent pathologic feature suggesting malignancy (75%) among the 60 patients who underwent surgical resection. Patient clinicopathologic characteristics and demographic factors were compared between those who had benign SPTs and those who had malignant SPTs. There were no significant differences in the various patient features between the 2 groups, including age, sex, symptoms, tumor size, tumor location, internal tumor composition, pattern of tumor calcification, tumor necrosis, hemorrhage, and immunohistochemical tumor tissue patterns. There were 2 patients who had distant metastasis; 1 presented with distal metastasis in the liver and the other patient had recurrence of cancer with a peritoneal mass after surgery. Metastasectomy was performed on the 2 patients and there was no mortality or disease progression during the follow-up period (median, 143 months; range, 53-319 months).

CONCLUSION

Solid pseudopapillary tumors are low-grade tumors that have a generally good prognosis. However, the clinical development and malignancy potential of SPTs are neither fully understood nor predictable, even with histologically benign tumors. Further investigations in tumor biology, along with long-term patient follow-up, may provide insight into the disease process and clinical development of SPTs.