Should fundoplication be added at the time of gastrostomy placement in patients who are neurologically impaired?

Prophylactic anti-reflux procedure for children undergoing laparoscopic gastrostomy: Rethinking of the routine practice

AIM

Laparoscopic gastrostomy is a frequently performed procedure in children requiring long-term enteral nutrition. The role of prophylactic anti-reflux surgery during gastrostomy placements is controversial. The current study aims to evaluate the role of prophylactic anti-reflux procedures during gastrostomy placement.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center analysis of all children without reflux receiving laparoscopic gastrostomy from January 2005 through December 2021 was performed. Demographics and clinical outcomes were compared between patients receiving gastrostomy placement alone and patients receiving gastrostomy with prophylactic anti-reflux surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 79 patients had a confirmed absence of reflux by a 24-h pH/impedance study before operation. Thirty-six of these patients underwent prophylactic anti-reflux surgery (PAR) while 43 received gastrostomy (PG) alone. The operative time and conversion rate were significantly higher in the PAR group (140.5 ± 67.5 vs. 80.2 ± 66.8 min, p = 0.0001 and 8.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.04). There were no major complications in either group. De novo reflux was detected in five patients (11.6%) in the PG group. None of these patients progressed to require anti-reflux surgery.

CONCLUSION

The occurrence of de novo reflux after laparoscopic gastrostomy was low and could be managed without anti-reflux surgery. A routine pre-operative pH study is helpful for appropriate patient selection to avoid unnecessary anti-reflux surgery, which lengthens operative time and increases the conversion rate.

Influence of laparoscopy-aided gastrostomy on gastroesophageal reflux in neurologically impaired patients using multichannel intraluminal impedance pH measurements

BACKGROUND

Development of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after gastrostomy remains debatable. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate whether laparoscopy-aided gastrostomy (LAG) influence on the occurrence of GERD in neurologically impaired (NI) patients. Furthermore, we investigated whether preoperatively excluding NI patients with GERD can reduce the number of patients requiring subsequent anti-reflux surgery (ARS) after LAG.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 35 NI patients (median age: 11.0; interquartile range 5.0-23.5 years) who underwent LAG according to our criterion from October 2012 to June 2020 and MII-pH before and after LAG. MII-pH parameters were compared in all patients and among three age groups between before and after LAG.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in MII-pH parameters before and 1 year after LAG in all patients, and no patient underwent subsequent ARS. Only one paediatric patient with 64 number of reflux episodes before LAG required subsequent ARS 3 years after LAG.

CONCLUSIONS

Generally, LAG did not influence the postoperative GERD at 1 year after LAG, and our criteria could reduce the number of patients requiring subsequent ARS. However, paediatric NI patients with higher number of reflux episodes in preoperative MII-pH study may need careful long-term follow-up after LAG.

Is fundoplication mandatory in children with neurological impairment undergoing gastrostomy?

AIM

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and surgical gastrostomy (SG) are common procedures in children with neurological impairment (NI) with swallowing difficulties. Pulmonary aspirations are a major concern and performing concomitant or delayed fundoplication is still controversial, especially among these patients. The aim of our study was to review our experience with fundoplication performed concomitantly with gastrostomy or later and to evaluate patient outcomes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, cohort study including all paediatric patients who underwent SG or PEG with or without Nissen fundoplication at Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel between the years 2007 and 2018. Patients' clinical and surgical data were recorded and analysed.

RESULTS

Between 2007 and 2018, 345 patients underwent SG or PEG. Of these, 89 patients underwent fundoplication. Of the patients who underwent PEG/SG, 158 (45.8%) were neurologically impaired. Most of the patients who underwent fundoplication (n = 69, 77.5%) were NI patients (P = 0.0001). NI patients with refractory seizures showed almost no improvement in terms of relief of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms following fundoplication (P = 0.0001) compared to NI patients without refractory seizures.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that in NI patients a concomitant fundoplication is not mandatory and is not efficacious in preventing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in patients with refractory seizures.

To Wrap or Not? Utility of Anti-reflux Procedure in Infants Needing Gastrostomy Tubes

PURPOSE

Gastrostomy tube (GT) insertion is commonly performed in children with failure to thrive. Pediatric patients' frequently have gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and discerning pathological GER can be challenging. Moreover, there is some evidence that GT insertion may lead to worsening GER and to avoid a subsequent anti-reflux procedure (ARP), though controversial some surgeons advocate considering an ARP concomitantly. The purpose of this report is to assess outcomes in infants who underwent a GT vs. GT with ARP.

METHODS

Retrospective review of all infants who had a GT placed at a single institution from 2009-2014. The patients were then divided into two cohorts based on the index operation i.e., GT vs GT with ARP and outcomes compared.

RESULTS

226 operations (104 GT, 122 GT with ARP) were performed. The cohorts were similar in gender, gestational age, race, weight, median age, LOS, and proportion of neurologically impaired patients. Preoperative GER was significantly higher in the GT with ARP cohort (91 vs. 18%). No difference in the rate of immediate complications was noted between the two groups. Postoperative increase in anti-reflux medications was significantly higher in the GT cohort (p = 0.01). Post-op GER needing a secondary procedure (ARP or GJ tube) was noted in 21/104 (20%) patients. Those needing an additional procedure vs. those with GT alone were similar in the proportion of patients with pre-op GER, neurologic impairment, type of feeds, and age.

CONCLUSION

Identifying patients who would benefit from a concomitant ARP remains challenging. A fifth of GT patients needed a subsequent procedure despite most high-risk patients having already undergone an ARP. Since the overall rate of complications remained similar, initial GT approach can be considered reasonable.

Long-term outcome and efficiency of symptom-selective approach to assess gastroesophageal reflux prior to gastrostomy in neurologically impaired children

PURPOSE

To evaluate the necessity of preoperative screening for gastroesophageal reflux (GER) prior to gastrostomy in neurologically impaired children.

METHODS

Medical records of neurologically impaired children, who have undergone laparoscopic gastrostomy between January, 2004 and June, 2018, were retrospectively reviewed. Before the year of 2014, all patients who required gastrostomy had been routinely screened for GER pre-operatively, but after the year of 2014, only the ones with GER-related symptoms were tested. The characteristics and outcomes of Routine Screening (RS) and Selective Screening (SS) periods were compared.

RESULTS

There were 55 and 54 patients in the RS and SS periods, respectively. Demographics, primary pathologies, and mean follow-up durations (> 2 years) were similar. The rate of GER screening was significantly lower in the SS period (29.6% vs. 63.6%). The rate of Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication (LNF) combined with gastrostomy was significantly lower in the SS period (14.8% vs. 38.2%). During follow-up, the rates of new-onset GER symptoms (13% vs. 11.7%) and LNF requirement later on (6.5% vs. 8.8%) were statistically similar between the two periods.

CONCLUSION

Routine screening for GER is not necessary prior to gastrostomy in neurologically impaired children. Symptom-selective screening algorithm is safe and efficient in the long term.

Pre- and Postgastrostomy Evaluation of Gastroesophageal Reflux in Children Using 24-Hour pH Monitoring

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate 24-hour pH monitoring results before and after gastrostomy in neurological impaired (NI) children who underwent gastrostomy or Nissen fundoplication (NF) concurrently with gastrostomy. Materials and Methods: Between March and December 2018, NI patients who had previously received pre- and postgastrostomy (Group 1) or gastrostomy + NF (Group 2) underwent pH monitoring pre- and postoperatively. Results: Twenty patients [12 males (60%) and the median age of 5.6 (14 months-14.7 years) years] with NI were followed up during the study period. When pre- and postgastrostomy weight and BMI z-scores were compared, the results were significantly higher in both groups after procedure (P = .043, P = .040, respectively). The clinical results of the patients after the operation showed improvement in both groups. The pH index of Group 1 (n = 11) was 2.32 (0-3.8) before gastrostomy and 3.18 (2.1-6.9) after gastrostomy (P = .061) and in Group 2 (n = 9) it was 5.85 (4.9-15.8) and 0.61 (0.3-1.3), before and after procedure (P < .001). There was a statistically significant difference in reflux index of each group. This difference was not statistically significant between the groups (P = .072). When the total bolus exposure index was compared, it was 4.01 (2.1-5.2) before gastrostomy and 5.67 (4.6-6.3) after gastrostomy in Group 1 (P = .041). In group 2, that index was found to be 9.8 (8.3-10.2) before and 1.28 (0.5-1.4) after (P < .001). There was a statistically significant difference in index after gastrostomy in Groups 1 and 2 (P = .023). Conclusions: Gastrostomy feeding is an effective and safe option to achieve enteral feeding in NI children. NF concurrent with gastrostomy should be decided according to the individual patient. Clinical trials protocol registration ID number was PRS NCT00445112.

Fundoplication with gastrostomy vs gastrostomy alone: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes and complications

PURPOSE

We compare the outcomes of fundoplication with gastrostomy vs gastrostomy alone and review the need for subsequent fundoplication after the initial gastrostomy alone.

METHODS

We searched studies published from 1969 to 2016 for comparative outcomes of concomitant fundoplication with gastrostomy (FGT) vs gastrostomy insertion alone (GT) in children. Gastrostomy methods included open, laparoscopic, and endoscopic procedures. Primary aims were minor and major complications. Secondary aims included post-operative reflux-related complications, fundoplication specific complications, and need for subsequent fundoplication after GT.

RESULTS

We reviewed 447 studies; 6 observational studies were included for meta-analysis, encompassing 2730 children undergoing GT (n = 1745) or FGT (n = 985). FGT was associated with more minor complications [19.9 vs 11.4%, OR 2.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43-2.87, p ≤ 0.0001, I ² = 0%], minor complications requiring revision (6.8 vs 3.0%, OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.28-4.05, p = 0.005, I ² = 0%), and more overall complications (21.3 vs 12.0%, OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.43-2.78, p < 0.0001, I ² = 0%). Incidence of major complications (1.8 vs 2.0%, OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.62-3.11, p = 0.42, I ² = 5%) and reflux-related complications (8.8 vs 10.3%, OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.35-1.68, p = 0.46, I ² = 0%) in both groups was similar. Incidence of subsequent fundoplication in GT patients was 8.6% (mean).

CONCLUSIONS

Gastrostomy alone is associated with fewer minor and overall complications. Concomitant fundoplication does not significantly reduce reflux-related complications. As few patients require fundoplication after gastrostomy, current evidence does not support concomitant fundoplication.

Concomitant Fundoplication With Gastrostomy: A Two-State Comparison Showing Continued Use of Reflux Medications

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine whether practice differences for fundoplication exist between 2 geographically distinct states, and to determine the reflux medication use pattern associated with concomitant fundoplication.

METHODS

A retrospective observational cohort study of children in Colorado (CO) and North Carolina (NC) insured by Medicaid from 2006 to 2008. Children who received a surgical gastrostomy during the study period were included, and our primary outcome measure was the performance of a concomitant gastric fundoplication. Thirty-day prescription fills for reflux medications were examined before and after gastrostomy procedure.

RESULTS

We examined 969 surgical gastrostomy admission in both states over the 3-year study period (CO, n = 341 and NC, n = 628). Patients in each state had similar age (median age, 6 months, P = 0.97). Use of pH probe (CO: 15%, NC: 11%) and diagnosis of reflux (CO: 84%, NC: 72%) differed in each state. Concomitant fundoplication was performed in 60% of patients in CO and 43% in NC (P < 0.01). Age less than 6 months was associated with an increased adjusted odds of fundoplication in CO (OR 9.77, CI, 3.91, 24.43), but less so in NC (OR 2.73, CI, 1.48, 5.04). Among patients undergoing gastrostomy, the proportion of patients on reflux medication 4 to 6 months post-discharge did not differ between those receiving fundoplication and those that did not in either state.

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of concomitant fundoplication varied in the 2 states despite patients having similar demographic and clinical characteristics. Antireflux surgery was not associated with a reduction in reflux medications in either state.

A Core Outcome Set for Children With Feeding Tubes and Neurologic Impairment: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Uncertainty exists about the impacts of feeding tubes on neurologically impaired children. Core outcome sets (COS) standardize outcome selection, definition, measurement, and reporting.

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize an evidence base of qualitative data on all outcomes selected and/or reported for neurologically impaired children 0 to 18 years living with gastrostomy/gastrojejunostomy tubes.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Register databases searched from inception to March 2014.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles examining health outcomes of neurologically impaired children living with feeding tubes.

DATA EXTRACTION

Outcomes were extracted and assigned to modified Outcome Measures in Rheumatology 2.0 Filter core areas; death, life impact, resource use, pathophysiological manifestations, growth and development.

RESULTS

We identified 120 unique outcomes with substantial heterogeneity in definition, measurement, and frequency of selection and/or reporting: "pathophysiological manifestation" outcomes (n = 83) in 79% of articles; "growth and development" outcomes (n = 13) in 55% of articles; "death" outcomes (n = 3) and "life impact" outcomes (n = 17) in 39% and 37% of articles, respectively; "resource use" outcomes (n = 4) in 14%. Weight (50%), gastroesophageal reflux (35%), and site infection (25%) were the most frequently reported outcomes.

LIMITATIONS

We were unable to investigate effect size of outcomes because quantitative data were not collected.

CONCLUSIONS

The paucity of outcomes assessed for life impact, resource use and death hinders meaningful evidence synthesis. A COS could help overcome the current wide heterogeneity in selection and definition. These results will form the basis of a consensus process to produce a final COS.

Unilateral versus bilateral wrap crural fixation in laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for children

Introduction:

Gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) is common in neurologically impaired (NI) children. Fundoplication and gastrostomy have previously been indicated in NI children with GERD who have not responded to medical treatment. The most common reason for fundoplication failure is intrathoracic migration of the wrap.

Objective:

The aim of the study is to measure the effect of wrap fixation on the final outcome of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in NI children.

Patients and Methods:

A retrospective file review was conducted for all NI children who underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in 2 tertiary pediatric surgery centers in the United Arab Emirates from February 15, 2006 to February 15, 2013. Redo fundoplication patients were excluded from the study. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 in which the fundoplication wrap was fixed to the right crus only, and group 2 in which the wrap was fixed to the right and left crus simultaneously.

Results:

The study population included 68 patients; there were 47 male and 21 female children. Mean age at time of surgery was 8.2 years. Recurrent GERD at 1 year postoperatively was 26% versus 7% in group 1 and group 2, respectively, by upper contrast study. Redo surgery was required in 21% versus 3% in group 1 and group 2, respectively.

Conclusions:

Bilateral fixation of the wrap to diaphragmatic crura significantly reduced recurrent GERD, in laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for neurologically impaired children, with no increased risk of morbidities. Future prospective studies should be conducted with larger patient populations and longer follow-up periods.

Evaluation of antireflux surgery using multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH measurement in neurologically impaired patients

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate esophageal function before and after antireflux surgery (ARS) in neurologically impaired (NI) patients using 24 h multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII)-pH measurement.

METHODS

Seven NI patients (age, 0-33 years; median, 13 years) were assessed before and after ARS using 24 h MII-pH. We described reflux parameters such as pH reflux index, bolus exposure index, number of acidic and nonacidic reflux episodes, mean acid clearance time and median bolus clearance time, and esophageal motility parameters in dry swallows such as bolus presence time (BPT), total bolus transit time (TBTT), and total propagation velocity (TPV).

RESULTS

The postoperative reflux parameters such as pH reflux index, acid clearance time, bolus exposure index, and the number of acidic reflux episodes significantly decreased (P < 0.05) compared with the preoperative ones. The esophageal motility parameters including all sites of BPTs, TBTT, and TPV did not change in the MII-pH measurement after ARS (P = non-significant).

CONCLUSION

ARS effectively reduced gastro-esophageal reflux (GER) in NI patients without the impairment of esophageal motility by MII-pH measurement. MII-pH was useful to detect the subtype of GER before and after ARS and appeared to be appropriate for evaluating esophageal motility.

Simple fundoplication versus additional vagotomy and pyloroplasty in neurologically impaired children--a single centre experience

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Gastrooesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a significant problem in children with neurological impairment (NI) with high failure rates for fundoplication. Fundoplication with vagotomy and pyloroplasty (FVP) can improve the outcome by altering the sensory or motor dysfunction associated with the reflux. We report our comparative outcomes for simple fundoplication (SF) and FVP in NI children.

METHODS

Case records of all patients having fundoplication under a single consultant at a tertiary UK paediatric surgical centre between January 1997 and December 2012 were retrospectively assessed for recurrent symptoms and redo surgery. The data were collected using a Microsoft Excel database and analysed on Graphpad prism software program. Data are median (range). P value<0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Data were available for 244 out of 275 patients who underwent fundoplication during this period (157 SF and 87 FVP). Neurological disease or known syndromes were recorded in 158 patients. Thirty-five children had congenital anatomical abnormalities. Laparoscopic fundoplication was done in 37 cases. Revisional surgery for recurrent symptoms was performed in 22 patients. In the neurologically normal children, all of whom had SF, the revision rate was 6.5%. In the NI children the revision rates were 18.5% for SF and 3.9% for FVP, respectively (Fisher's exact, P<0.05). The median time to redo surgery was 10 (1-63) months, and the median time to follow up was 19.5 (2-177) months.

CONCLUSIONS

There appears to be a significantly lower need for redo surgery following FVP than SF in children with NI.

Does laparoscopy-aided gastrostomy placement improve or worsen gastroesophageal reflux in patients with neurological impairment?

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively investigate whether laparoscopy-aided gastrostomy placement (LGP) improved or worsened gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in neurological impairment (NI) patients.

METHODS

Subjects included 26 NI patients nourished via nasogastric tubes (age, 1-17years; median, 6years). They were divided into groups based on the percentage of time with an esophageal pH <4.0 (reflux index: RI) before LGP: Group 1 (GI, n=13), RI <5.0%; Group II (GH, n=13), RI ≥5.0%. Acid/nonacid reflux episodes (RE) were evaluated using combined pH-multichannel intraluminal impedance (pH-MII) monitoring, and gastric emptying was measured with the C breath test before and after LGP.

RESULTS

RI and number of RE evaluated with pH analyses and number of total/acid distal and proximal bolus RE with pH-MH increased significantly in GI. RI and acid clearance time with pH analyses and number of total bolus RE with pH-MII decreased significantly in GH. Gastric emptying parameters did not change significantly in GI, whereas the half-gastric emptying time and gastric emptying coefficient improved significantly in GH.

CONCLUSION

LGP reduces GER in NI patients with pathological GER by improving gastric emptying, although it has a paradoxical influence on those without pathological GER.

Fundoplication and the pediatric surgeon: implications for shared decision-making and the medical home

OBJECTIVE

Almost one-half of all pediatric gastrostomy tube insertions are accompanied by a fundoplication, yet little is understood about the surgical decision-making for these procedures. The objective of this study was to examine the decision-making process of surgeons about whether to perform a fundoplication in children already scheduled to have a gastrostomy tube placed.

METHODS

A written questionnaire of all pediatric surgeons at a major children's hospital was completed for each planned gastrostomy procedure over the course of 1 year; the questionnaire asked about various influences on the fundoplication decision: primary care and subspecialty physicians' opinions, patient characteristics, and parent opinions. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics from the medical record, as well as questionnaire responses, were summarized for each gastrostomy occurrence. We modeled the association of questionnaire responses and patient characteristics with the outcome of having a fundoplication.

RESULTS

We received questionnaires on 161 of 169 eligible patients (95%). A total of 52% of patients had fundoplication. Primary care physicians were involved in 44% of decisions, and when involved had "a lot" of influence on the fundoplication decision only 28% of time, compared with neonatologists (61%), hospitalists (44%), pediatric pulmonologists (42%), and pediatric gastroenterologists (40%). A total of 86% of patients had a subspecialist involved, and 28% had >1 subspecialist. A pH probe was performed in 7.5% of cases, and failed pharmacotherapy was noted by the surgeons in only 26.5% of the fundoplications performed.

CONCLUSIONS

The decision to do a fundoplication was rarely based on definitive testing or failed medical treatment. From the surgeon's perspective, subspecialists were more influential than primary care physicians, which is at odds with current concepts of the medical home.